![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The following Letter Type C, or variations thereof, was submitted by individuals or entities.Letter Type C:Honorable, I urge you to reconsider proposed amendments to your extremely successful whistleblower program. Whistleblowers have helped the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recover over $1.7 billion in sanctions from wrongdoers over the past decade, including more than $901 million in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and interest. The recently proposed amendments would be extremely detrimental to whistleblowers and undermine the success of the program. Proposed revisions to Exchange Act Rule 21F-9(e) would create unrealistic reporting procedures that would disqualify a vast number of whistleblowers, simply because they reported their concerns to the wrong office at the SEC, rather than filling out a specific form and filing it according to specific reporting procedures. Proposed revisions to Exchange Act Rule 21F-6 would also disincentivize whistleblowers from coming forward by placing an arbitrary limit on whistleblower rewards, especially in cases where the whistleblower uncovered massive frauds. Congress has rejected such arbitrary limits, but the Commission’s proposed rule would authorize these drastic reductions in the amount of rewards in major fraud cases. Rewards must be based on the level of the whistleblower’s contribution to the successful outcome of the case. They are essential in encouraging whistleblowers to step forward with high-quality information on the largest cases. I urge you to reconsider these proposed amendments to ensure your robust whistleblower program continues. If you have any questions about the potential impacts of these amendments or would like more information, please contact John Kostyack, Executive Director of the National Whistleblower Center. Sincerely,
http://www.sec.gov/comments/comments/s7-16-18/s71618-typec.htm
|