|  |   | 
 The following Letter Type D, or variations thereof, was submitted by individuals or entities.Letter Type D:Dear Mr. Fields, I am writing in opposition to proposed Rule 30e-3. I strongly oppose this proposal for the  following reasons: 
Studies  have shown that the majority of investors prefer to receive shareholder reports  and other information on paper.Studies  have also shown that comprehension and retention of content such as shareholder  reports increases significantly when they are read on paper.Conversely,  the transparency of information related to transactions decreases significantly  when shareholder reports are delivered and read electronically.The  availability, storage, and ease of access to historical data significantly  increases when the data is presented on paper.Significant  portions of the population, primarily elderly, poor, and those residing in  rural areas, do not have regular and reliable access to the internet. Therefore  their ability to access shareholder reports would be significantly and  negatively impacted.Electronic  delivery of shareholder reports and related information, as opposed to paper,  will have a significant and negative impact on jobs within the Paper/Print/Mail  segment of our economy.Conversely,  electronic delivery of shareholder reports and related information, as opposed  to paper, will allow the investment firmsĀ   to save money on printing and postage and will have a significant and  positive impact on Wall Street profitability and bonuses, a segment of our  economy that is certainly not suffering. In closing, we would ask for your assistance in  addressing this issue. Allowing Rule 30e-3 to be implemented is not in the best  interests of investors, our industry, or the general public. We need more transparency, not less. We need  more informed investors. We need easy and equal access to important economic  and investment information. Most investors already have ready access to  electronic delivery if they prefer and most don't.Your support is greatly appreciated.     http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-08-15/s70815-210.htm
 
 |