Subject: S7-04-23: Webform Comments from Anonymous
From: Anonymous
Affiliation:

Oct. 29, 2023

The SEC's actions fail to consider international
implications: - 

Under the proposed rule, the SEC's custody requirements would
unilaterally impose the SEC's singular view of appropriate
custodial arrangements on global crypto markets and participants. This
unilateral action fails to consider the cross-border nature of crypto
markets and the wide array of market infrastructures and participants
that have emerged to serve investors worldwide. By extending its reach
beyond funds and securities into broader crypto asset markets, the SEC
risks creating regulatory fragmentation and market uncertainty across
jurisdictions.

Such a unilateral expansion could undermine international comity and
cooperation by purporting to regulate activities of non-U.S.
participants operating outside the United States. It could also incite
retaliatory actions by foreign regulators that adversely impact U.S.
firms. The proposed rule would also likely disrupt cross-border
capital flows by inhibiting the ability of U.S. advisers to access
foreign crypto markets and non-U.S. custodial platforms. This could
reduce market liquidity and investment opportunities for U.S. firms
and investors.

As a member of IOSCO, the SEC has generally committed to considering
the extent to which a rule may conflict with the laws or regulations
of another jurisdiction when evaluating regulatory proposals. But the
Release does not reflect any effort to consult with foreign
counterparts or consider alternative approaches to avoid conflict. The
SEC should re-propose this rule only after substantive consultations
with foreign regulators to identify workable solutions that align with
emerging international standards.