Subject: S7-04-23: Webform Comments from Global Freedom
From: Global Freedom
Affiliation:

Oct. 28, 2023

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to provide my comments and concerns regarding the
Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) proposed rule on
"Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets." While I appreciate
the SEC's objective of enhancing investor protections and
addressing gaps in the custody rule, I believe that the proposed rule
fails to adequately consider the principles of freedom and the
American way.

As a strong advocate for innovation and economic freedom, I firmly
believe that regulation should be balanced, practical, and avoid
unnecessary burden on market participants. The proposed rule,
particularly when applied to digital assets such as cryptocurrencies,
imposes impractical and burdensome requirements that stifle
technological advancements and hinder market growth.

The unique properties of digital assets, particularly cryptocurrencies
based on blockchain technology, should be taken into account when
formulating custodial arrangements. It is essential for regulatory
bodies like the SEC to recognize the decentralized nature and
technological complexities of cryptocurrency. Imposing traditional
custodial requirements, without considering the distinctive
characteristics of digital assets, hinders innovation and undermines
the freedom to participate in emerging markets and technologies.

Furthermore, the proposed rule fails to provide clear guidance on how
investment advisers can comply with the safeguarding requirements
concerning cryptocurrencies. The SEC should work to strike a balance
by providing clear guidelines and allowances that ensure investor
protection while enabling the efficient functioning of digital asset
markets. Flexibility and adaptability in the regulatory framework will
foster innovation, promote market competition, and ultimately benefit
investors.

Moreover, it is crucial to avoid adopting a one-size-fits-all
approach, especially when regulating digital assets. The dynamic and
rapidly evolving nature of this industry calls for a regulatory
framework that is responsive, adaptable, and oriented towards
promoting economic freedom and the American way. Regulatory hurdles
that hinder market participants from fully utilizing digital assets
will ultimately weaken the competitiveness of the United States in the
global marketplace.

In conclusion, I urge the SEC to reconsider the proposed rule on
safeguarding advisory client assets and take into account the
principles of freedom, innovation, and the American way. A balanced
and practical regulatory framework will not only enhance investor
protections but also encourage market growth and technological
advancements. 

Sincerely,