Subject: S7-04-23: Webform Comments from C Cassidy
From: C Cassidy
Affiliation:

Oct. 28, 2023

To whom it may concern,

I, C Cassidy, am submitting this public comment in response to the
Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) proposed rule on
safeguarding advisory client assets. While I appreciate the SEC's
intention to enhance investor protections, I have significant concerns
regarding potential overreach of regulatory authority, particularly in
relation to digital assets or crypto.

Digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies, have emerged as a
transformative force in the financial industry. They leverage
blockchain technology to provide individuals with privacy, freedom to
transact, and a decentralized financial platform. It is crucial to
recognize and respect the unique characteristics and potential of
these digital assets.

The proposed rule appears to extend the SEC's oversight and
control over digital assets in a way that may exceed its regulatory
authority. It is essential to strike a delicate balance between
protecting investors and allowing the innovation and growth of digital
assets to flourish. Excessive regulatory intervention could stifle the
promising potential of blockchain technology and hinder its ability to
revolutionize various industries.

While it is incumbent upon regulators to mitigate risks associated
with the use of digital assets, it is also crucial to foster an
environment that encourages innovation, entrepreneurship, and
individual privacy. Excessive regulatory oversight can impede the
development of these emerging technologies and limit their potential
benefits.

Moreover, it is worth noting that the investors participating in the
crypto space are often well-aware of the inherent risks. They
understand and accept the decentralized nature of cryptocurrency and
the responsibility that comes with managing their own assets. Imposing
additional regulations beyond what is necessary may be duplicative and
burdensome for both investors and industry participants.

Instead of expanding the SEC's regulatory authority over digital
assets, the commission should collaborate with other relevant
regulatory bodies that have specific expertise in overseeing these
assets. A collaborative approach will ensure a comprehensive and
well-informed regulatory framework that addresses digital
asset-related risks without stifling innovation.

In conclusion, while I appreciate the SEC's efforts to enhance
investor protections through the proposed rule on safeguarding
advisory client assets, I urge the commission to consider the
potential overreach of regulatory authority. Particularly concerning
is the proposal's treatment of digital assets, which may inhibit
the growth and potential of the emerging crypto industry.

The SEC should adopt an approach that fosters innovation,
entrepreneurship, and individual privacy, while ensuring appropriate
safeguards are in place to protect investors. I encourage the SEC to
engage in collaborative discussions with other regulatory agencies to
develop an inclusive regulatory framework that recognizes the unique
characteristics and potential risks of digital assets.

Thank you for considering my comment. Please let me know if you
require any further information or clarification. I look forward to
the SEC's thoughtful consideration of all public comments and the
development of a balanced and effective regulatory approach.

Sincerely,

C Cassidy