Subject: S7–04–23
From: Mick Mekonnen
Affiliation:

Oct. 18, 2023

reopening of the comment period for the proposed rule, "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets," with its connection to the private fund adviser audit rule, raises concerns about its potential negative impact on public perception. One major concern is that this move could erode trust and confidence in the financial sector and regulatory bodies. The general public often views regulatory bodies like the SEC as guardians of financial stability and transparency. If changes to regulations are perceived as favoring specific industry players or as complex and opaque, it could fuel suspicions of regulatory capture, where agencies are seen as serving the interests of those they are supposed to regulate. This erosion of trust may lead to skepticism about the industry's integrity and the government's ability to protect investors and maintain a fair and open financial system. 


Furthermore, negative public perception can extend to the financial sector itself. Investors and clients depend on investment advisers and institutions to safeguard their assets and uphold the highest ethical standards. If the proposed rule is seen as weakening accountability or introducing ambiguity, it may foster doubts about the industry's commitment to maintaining client interests. This could drive investors to look for alternatives or even reduce their participation in the financial markets, potentially undermining the market's efficiency and vibrancy. 


Lastly, the negative impact could extend to government policies in general. When regulatory changes are viewed as opaque or influenced by specific interests, it can lead to broader disillusionment with government institutions and policymaking. This could diminish public confidence in the ability of government bodies to create and enforce rules that protect the common good. In the long run, a weakened public perception of government agencies may hinder their effectiveness and the broader societal goals they aim to achieve. Thus, the proposed rule's impact on public trust and confidence in the financial sector and regulatory bodies should be carefully considered to ensure the continued stability and integrity of the financial markets.