Dear Securities and Exchange Commission, I am writing to submit my public comment in response to the proposed rule on "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets." While I understand the aim of the SEC to enhance investor protections and address gaps in the custody rule, I have several concerns regarding the potential negative impact on decentralized finance (DeFi) and the treatment of digital assets, particularly cryptocurrencies. First and foremost, I am concerned that the proposed rules may hinder the growth and development of decentralized finance projects, thereby limiting innovation and potential financial inclusion. Digital assets, like cryptocurrencies, built on blockchain technology, have been transforming the financial landscape and presenting new opportunities for investors and consumers alike. However, regulatory uncertainty poses significant challenges to the advancement of this industry. Imposing stringent custody requirements without considering the unique characteristics of digital assets could stifle innovation and prevent the realization of their full potential. Additionally, I would like to draw attention to the SEC case against Richard Heart. I support Heart and believe that the case against him is unfounded. I willingly sacrificed my money towards Heart's project without any expectations of profit from the work of others. As an investor, I believe it is up to Heart to use the funds as he sees fit, without undue interference from regulatory agencies. It is crucial that a case should not be put forward against anyone unless there is sufficient evidence to support it, as unwarranted legal actions can stifle the progression of the hard work individuals have put into their projects. I strongly urge the SEC to reconsider its position and drop this case, as no regulations have been broken. Furthermore, I encourage the SEC to consider and address the regulatory uncertainties surrounding digital assets, especially in the context of custody. Due to their unique characteristics, such as immutability, transparency, and decentralized nature, traditional custody practices may not always directly apply to digital assets. It is essential to craft rules and regulations that strike a balance between investor protection and fostering innovation in this rapidly evolving space. Flexibility and openness to new solutions and technologies are necessary for the continued growth and success of the digital asset ecosystem. In conclusion, I urge the Securities and Exchange Commission to carefully consider the potential negative impact of the proposed rules on decentralized finance and digital assets. BALANCING investor protection with fostering innovation and growth is crucial for the continued advancement of the financial industry. I appreciate the SEC's effort to enhance security and protect client assets, but I believe it is essential to ensure that these rules are crafted with a clear understanding of the unique characteristics of digital assets and their potential value to both investors and the broader economy. There needs to be strong evidence in favour of a case before it is brought forward. Please drop the case against Richard Heart. I sacrificed money without any EXPECTATION of profit from the work of others and he has full rights to use the sacrificed money as he sees fit. Thank you for considering my comments. If there are any further areas of concern that I may address or any additional questions I can answer, please do not hesitate to reach out. Sincerely, Razia Naqvi-Jukes