Subject: S7-02-22: Webform Comments from James Dugger
From: James Dugger
Affiliation:

Oct. 18, 2023

The proposed definition of "exchange" is not appropriate for
a decentralized cryptocurrency that is not traded on a centralized
exchange, such as Coinbase, due to the decentralized nature of
cryptocurrency and DeFi platforms and the way that users of DeFi
platforms interact with DeFi platforms in a trustless manner via smart
contract.

The proposed definition of "exchange" is as follows:

An organization, association, or group of persons that brings together
buyers and sellers of securities, or facilitates trading between or
among buyers and sellers of securities.

This definition is overly broad, encompassing a wide range of trading
platforms, including centralized exchanges, decentralized exchanges
(DEXs), and even peer-to-peer (P2P) trading platforms.

However, there are several key differences between centralized
exchanges and DEXs. Centralized exchanges are controlled by a single
entity, which is responsible for maintaining the order book, executing
trades, and holding customer assets. DEXs, on the other hand, are
non-custodial and decentralized, meaning that there is no single
entity in control. Instead, trades are executed on-chain using smart
contracts.

This decentralized nature of DEXs makes it difficult to apply the
proposed definition of "exchange" to them. For example, it
is not clear who or what constitutes the "organization,
association, or group of persons" that brings together buyers and
sellers on a DEX. Additionally, DEXs do not facilitate trading in the
same way that centralized exchanges do. Instead, they provide a
platform for users to trade directly with each other in a trustless
manner.

Due to these differences, it is not appropriate to apply the proposed
definition of "exchange" to decentralized cryptocurrencies
that are not traded on centralized exchanges. Forcing DEXs to register
as exchanges would stifle innovation and make it more difficult for
users to access these platforms.

Here is a specific example of how the proposed definition of
"exchange" would not work for a DEX:

Centralized exchange: A user deposits funds into their account on the
exchange and then places an order to buy or sell a cryptocurrency. The
exchange then executes the trade and stores the cryptocurrency in the
user's account.
DEX: A user connects their wallet to the DEX and then places an order
to buy or sell a cryptocurrency. The order is then matched with
another user's order on the DEX and the trade is executed
on-chain. The user's funds remain in their wallet at all times.
Under the proposed definition of "exchange" the DEX would
be considered an exchange because it facilitates trading between
buyers and sellers of securities. However, it is important to note
that the DEX does not have control over the user's funds or the
execution of the trade. The trade is executed on-chain using a smart
contract, which is a self-executing contract that is stored on the
blockchain.

This means that the DEX does not meet all of the criteria for a
centralized exchange. It does not have control over the user's
funds or the execution of the trade, and it does not provide the same
level of services as a centralized exchange.

Forcing DEXs to register as exchanges would stifle innovation and make
it more difficult for users to access these platforms. It is important
to develop a regulatory framework that is appropriate for the unique
characteristics of DEXs and other DeFi platforms.