Subject: File No. S7-2026-29
From: Alec Snelling
Affiliation:

Nov. 3, 2026

Re: File No. S7-2026-29; Docket SEC-2026-5459; RIN 3235-AN82; FR Doc.
2026-17939 (91 FR 56387 et seq., Sep. 2, 2026)
Exemption of Debt Obligations Issued by the European Union Under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for Purposes of Trading Futures
Contracts on Those Securities

To the Securities and Exchange Commission:

I am a private citizen. I support the proposal with conditions. The
Commission proposes to designate EU-issued debt obligations as
"exempted securities" solely so futures on those securities can be
marketed and traded in the United States or to U.S. persons under the
Commodity Exchange Act framework, as Rule 3a12-8 already does for debt
of certain foreign governments. Broader hedging tools for U.S. persons
can deepen markets-if American exchanges and customers get a fair,
transparent deal. I offer these asks.

America First Markets
1. Adopt the designation only for the narrow futures-trading purpose
described, not as a broader securities exemption.
2. Confirm in the adopting release that U.S. persons gain practical
access on U.S.-registered exchanges or clear U.S. channels, and that
the change does not disadvantage futures on U.S. Treasury securities.
3. Require clear public disclosure of which EU debt instruments
qualify and which futures products rely on the exemption, updated when
the list changes.

Accountability
4. Within two years of adoption, publish a short staff report on U.S.
trading volume, concentration, and any operational incidents tied to
these products, so the Commission can revisit the exemption on
evidence.
5. Keep anti-fraud and manipulation authority fully intact; an
exempted-security label for futures purposes is not a free pass.

Thank you for the chance to comment.

Respectfully,
Alec Snelling
California

This comment was crafted with super intelligence (SI) support.