Subject: File No. S7-2026-19 — Comment of Persistence Analytics Group LLC on Rescission of Climate-Related Disclosure Rules
From: Neil P. Osnato
Affiliation:

Jun. 1, 2026

To the Securities and Exchange Commission:

Please accept this comment on behalf of Persistence Analytics Group LLC
regarding File No. S7-2026-19, Rescission of Climate-Related Disclosure
Rules.

Persistence Analytics Group LLC supports a registrant-specific,
materiality-based approach to disclosure.

The issue is not whether climate-related matters can ever be material.
They can be.

The issue is whether any disclosure requirement should be
category-based, highly prescriptive, and broadly applicable regardless
of a registrant’s specific business, financial condition, operating
exposure, capital structure, infrastructure dependency, or
investor-relevant risk profile.

Disclosure should be material, decision-useful, financially relevant,
and supported by evidence investors can reasonably rely on.

In that respect, the Commission’s proposal correctly returns attention
to the core securities-law question: whether a reasonable investor would
consider the information important in deciding whether to buy or sell a
security.

Materiality should not mean less truth.

It should mean better truth.

A registrant-specific materiality standard is especially important
because the next generation of investor-relevant infrastructure risk is
broader than climate alone. Public companies may face material exposure
from energy availability, grid constraints, data-center load growth, AI
infrastructure demands, supply-chain dependency, water stress, insurance
costs, public-cost shifting, transmission bottlenecks, critical
equipment shortages, and stranded-capital risk.

Some of those risks may overlap with climate. Some may not.

But the proper disclosure test should be the same:

Does the risk materially affect the registrant’s business, cash flow,
operations, asset value, financing cost, capital structure, supply
chain, or valuation?

If yes, it should be disclosed clearly.

If no, the Commission should not require disclosure merely because the
topic is politically, socially, or academically important.

Investors do not benefit from disclosure volume that obscures the
material facts. They benefit from decision-grade evidence about the
assumptions that drive value, risk, cost, resilience, and future
performance.

For example, in the current market, AI and data-center growth are
creating major infrastructure questions for utilities, real estate,
technology companies, manufacturers, public finance issuers, and
energy-intensive businesses. Investors may need to understand whether
projected demand is durable, whether power is deliverable, whether
infrastructure costs may be shifted, whether supply chains are
constrained, and whether long-duration capital is being allocated around
assumptions that may not hold.

Those are materiality questions.

They should not be reduced to climate categories, nor excluded because
they fall outside climate categories.

The Commission should preserve and strengthen a disclosure framework
that is neutral as to political category and disciplined as to financial
materiality.

Persistence Analytics Group LLC therefore supports rescission of the
2024 climate-related disclosure rules to the extent those rules impose
broad, prescriptive, category-based obligations inconsistent with
registrant-specific materiality and disproportionate to their
investor-useful benefits.

At the same time, the Commission should continue to emphasize that
existing disclosure obligations already require public companies to
disclose material risks, trends, uncertainties, dependencies, and
assumptions when those matters are reasonably likely to affect business
performance, financial condition, or investor decision-making.

The right standard is not climate disclosure versus no climate
disclosure.

The right standard is material disclosure versus immaterial disclosure.

The Commission should require better truth, not more noise.

Respectfully submitted,


Neil P. Osnato
Founder

Persistence Analytics Group LLC
National Security & Infrastructure Risk Analytics
Demand Durability, Grid Stress & Load Integrity

📍 New Jersey, USA
📞 609-464-9055
✉️ neil@persistenceanalyticsgroup.com

Persistence Analytics Group
https://persistenceanalyticsgroup.com/

SAM.gov Registered Vendor
UEI: D3VYU39H6DX9 | CAGE: 19T34
D-U-N-S number: 142849930