July 30, 2010
I am a financial planning professional who works with middle and upper middle income clients. I operate both in an advisory and a broker capacity depending on the clients needs. There are situations where a broker relationship is in the clients best interest to deliver the best overall financial outcomes. It is the lower income/smaller asset client who will fall through the cracks if the fiduciary standard is mandated in all relationships. It will be difficult to accept the added liablility and expense for these smaller clients. Fee-only models are also more expensive for smaller accounts.
In additional to my CFP and ChFC designation which both require adherence to a code of ethical standards and require continuing education that includes ethics and suitablility classes, I am registered with the FINRA as a series 7, 63, and 24. I am required to take both FINRA and my broker/dealer's continuing education elements. My life and health insurance license also require continuing education that includes ethics and suitability requirements. I estimate that I spend approximately 15% of my time on education and compliance related tasks.
I could make the case that the suitability standard of compliance currently provides better consumer protection because of its resultant proactive training, documentation, and focus on prevention of consumer problems. The fiduciary standard enforces primarily through lawsuit and retroactive enforcement.
These are the outcomes of the implementation of the new standard:
1) No improvement in quality of financial advice.
2) Increased costs to financial professionals which will be passed on to clients - lower income clients will be priced out of the service.
3) It will be more difficult for financial professionals to get their start in the business and many experienced professionals will choose to get out of the business. Less competition and fewer consumer choices will lead to increased cost and decreased availability of quality advice. Everyone will choose to work with the wealthy to be more profitable.
As I think of the high profile (and some local) cases of fraud committed by financial professionals against their clients. In every case, those advisers had a fiduciary relationship with the clients that were harmed.
I understand that one of my professional associations, the FPA supports the new fiduciary standard. I disagree with my association and feel that they are acting in the association's best interest, not in the interest of the practitioner or client. The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors has taken a more thoughtful position on this topic. I would ask that you review their position.
Thank you for taking the time to read my thoughts on this matter.