Mar. 3, 2022
To whom it may concern, Thanks so much for all your efforts protecting our funds in this scam, and everyone here is luckily enough to have their 'invested' money back. In terms of what proposed distribution and comments on webpage, I, as a non US resident victim, would like to add some comments on proposed plan as follows. 1.The foreign victim should be treated and shared fairly with same opportunity and priority on receiving refund, as their investment funds are primarily from after tax personal savings outside America, and every victim here share the potential administrative cost from total refunds available and this does not increase the cost to US tax residents not to mention US resident should get refund in first priority for whatever reason it may be. Treat every victim equally should be the value and meaning behind 'Fair Fund'. 2.The way of verifying investor's identity should contain both transaction receipt and bank statement which include transferring the funds to scamer's recepient account, because VOG director, set VOG scam for example, has at least ID, passport, transaction receipt of sending the money. Adding the bank statement into verifying the identity could avoid scamer's delegation to illegally get the refund. 3. Lihong Wei (Sara) have actually return the full invested money to nearly 100 her closed peer or her illegal employee particularly Mr.Yuanchun Hou(Nickname侯小宝), unconfirmed legal name(nickname 文欣) and quite a lot from Taiwan and Mr.Jianjun Wang 王 建军（nickname 韭菜醒来）and Mr.Qisheng Chen (陈其升) living in USA, etc. Lihong Wei fully refund those around 100 close peers by the end of Dec 2020 from other funding source call G-service paid by Mile's Guo Saraca group. Lihong Wei should have the refund list and SEC should know well over who is on the list and exclude them from this round of refunding process to avoid their potential repeated getting the refund which potential harm other unrefunded victims' maximum refund they could get. 4. Refund plan runner should be careful on refund request from any so called authorised third parties (农场负责人，联盟委员会, etc) who files an authorisation letter from those fearful victim either from Mainland of China or any other countries. I suggest SEC should encourage ID holder nominated contact email and recipient bank account if closed in the first place, rather than refund money to someone unknown claiming they are authorised to collect victim's money. This protect the freezed money flowing back to scamer's group again and waste your time and efforts. 5. If anyway possible, please increase the percentage of first instalment from at least 50% as so many heartbroken victim's and families financially harmed so hard by this scam. Thank you so much for your consideration. An Australian investor