Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Contingencies [Abstract]
Contingencies	NOTE 13. Contingencies *Environmental Matters* The Company is involved in environmental proceedings and potential proceedings relating to soil and groundwater contamination and other environmental matters at several of its former facilities that were never required for its current operations. These facilities were part of the businesses disposed of by TransTechnology Corporation, the former parent of the Company. Environmental cleanup activities usually span multiple years, which make estimating liabilities a matter of judgment because of such factors as changing remediation technologies, assessments of the extent of contamination, and continually evolving regulatory environmental standards. The Company considers these and other factors in estimates of the timing and amount of any future costs that may be required for remediation actions. The Company records a liability for the amount that it determines to be the best estimate of the cost of remediation. The Company does not discount the recorded liabilities, as the amount and timing of future cash payments are not fixed or cannot be reliably determined. The Company retains the services of a nationally-recognized environmental consulting firm to help monitor its environmental liabilities. Based upon the information and the consultant’s analysis and recommendations, the Company determined that its best estimate of its future environmental liabilities is $13,987 before offsetting cost-sharing of approximately $1,500 that is classified mostly as a non-current asset. At September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the aggregate amount of liabilities recorded relative to environmental matters was $13,987 and $14,293, respectively. In the first six months of Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, the Company spent $518 and $166, respectively, on environmental costs, and for all of Fiscal 2011, the Company spent $638. The Company performs quarterly reviews of the status of its environmental sites and the related liabilities. There are a number of former operating facilities that the Company is monitoring or investigating for potential future remediation. In some cases, although a loss may be probable, it is not possible at this time to reasonably estimate the amount of any obligation for remediation activities because of uncertainties with respect to assessing the extent of the contamination or the applicable regulatory standard. The Company is also pursuing claims for contribution to site investigation and cleanup costs against other potentially responsible parties, including the U.S. Government. Although the Company takes great care in the development of these risk assessments and future cost estimates, the actual amount of the remediation costs may be different from those estimated as a result of a number of factors including: changes to federal and state environmental regulations or laws; changes in local construction costs and the availability of personnel and materials; unforeseen remediation requirements that are not apparent until the work actually commences; and actual remediation expenses that differ from those estimated. The Company does not include any unasserted claims that it might have against others in determining its potential liability for such costs, and, except as noted with regard to specific cost sharing arrangements, has no such arrangements, nor has the Company taken into consideration any future claims against insurance carriers that it may have in determining its environmental liabilities. In those situations where the Company is considered a de minimis participant in a remediation claim, the failure of the larger participants to meet their obligations could result in an increase in the liability with regard to such a site. The Company continues to participate in environmental assessments and remediation work at eleven locations, including certain former facilities. Due to the nature of environmental remediation and monitoring work, such activities can extend for up to 30 years, depending upon the nature of the work, the substances involved, and the regulatory requirements associated with each site. The Company does not discount the recorded liabilities. At the former facility in Glen Head, New York based upon the characterization work performed to date, the Company has accrued estimated costs of approximately $3,768. The amounts and timing of payments are subject to the approved remediation plan and additional discussions with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation. The Company sold the business previously operated at the property it owns in Saltzburg, Pennsylvania (“Federal Labs”). At September 30, 2011, the reserve for environmental liabilities at Federal Labs was $5,887. The Company expects that remediation at this site, which is subject to the oversight of the Pennsylvania authorities, will not be completed for several years, and that monitoring costs, although expected to be incurred over twenty years, could extend for up to thirty years. There are other properties that have a combined environmental liability of $4,332. In addition, the Company has been named as a potentially responsible party in four environmental proceedings pending in several states in which it is alleged that the Company was a generator of waste that was sent to landfills and other treatment facilities. The Company estimates that expected future costs, and the estimated proportional share of remedial work to be performed associated with these proceedings, will not exceed $100 and has provided for these estimated costs in the Company’s accrual for environmental liabilities. *Litigation* The Company is also engaged in various other legal proceedings incidental to its business. It is the opinion of management that, after taking into consideration information furnished by its counsel, these matters will have no material effect on the Company’s financial position or the results of operations or cash flows in future periods.

NOTE 13. Contingencies

Environmental Matters

The Company is involved in environmental proceedings and potential proceedings relating to soil and groundwater contamination and other environmental matters at several of its former facilities that were never required for its current operations. These facilities were part of the businesses disposed of by TransTechnology Corporation, the former parent of the Company. Environmental cleanup activities usually span multiple years, which make estimating liabilities a matter of judgment because of such factors as changing remediation technologies, assessments of the extent of contamination, and continually evolving regulatory environmental standards. The Company considers these and other factors in estimates of the timing and amount of any future costs that may be required for remediation actions. The Company records a liability for the amount that it determines to be the best estimate of the cost of remediation. The Company does not discount the recorded liabilities, as the amount and timing of future cash payments are not fixed or cannot be reliably determined.

The Company retains the services of a nationally-recognized environmental consulting firm to help monitor its environmental liabilities. Based upon the information and the consultant’s analysis and recommendations, the Company determined that its best estimate of its future environmental liabilities is $13,987 before offsetting cost-sharing of approximately $1,500 that is classified mostly as a non-current asset.

At September 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the aggregate amount of liabilities recorded relative to environmental matters was $13,987 and $14,293, respectively. In the first six months of Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, the Company spent $518 and $166, respectively, on environmental costs, and for all of Fiscal 2011, the Company spent $638. The Company performs quarterly reviews of the status of its environmental sites and the related liabilities. There are a number of former operating facilities that the Company is monitoring or investigating for potential future remediation. In some cases, although a loss may be probable, it is not possible at this time to reasonably estimate the amount of any obligation for remediation activities because of uncertainties with respect to assessing the extent of the contamination or the applicable regulatory standard. The Company is also pursuing claims for contribution to site investigation and cleanup costs against other potentially responsible parties, including the U.S. Government.

Although the Company takes great care in the development of these risk assessments and future cost estimates, the actual amount of the remediation costs may be different from those estimated as a result of a number of factors including: changes to federal and state environmental regulations or laws; changes in local construction costs and the availability of personnel and materials; unforeseen remediation requirements that are not apparent until the work actually commences; and actual remediation expenses that differ from those estimated. The Company does not include any unasserted claims that it might have against others in determining its potential liability for such costs, and, except as noted with regard to specific cost sharing arrangements, has no such arrangements, nor has the Company taken into consideration any future claims against insurance carriers that it may have in determining its environmental liabilities. In those situations where the Company is considered a de minimis participant in a remediation claim, the failure of the larger participants to meet their obligations could result in an increase in the liability with regard to such a site.

The Company continues to participate in environmental assessments and remediation work at eleven locations, including certain former facilities. Due to the nature of environmental remediation and monitoring work, such activities can extend for up to 30 years, depending upon the nature of the work, the substances involved, and the regulatory requirements associated with each site. The Company does not discount the recorded liabilities.

At the former facility in Glen Head, New York based upon the characterization work performed to date, the Company has accrued estimated costs of approximately $3,768. The amounts and timing of payments are subject to the approved remediation plan and additional discussions with the New York Department of Environmental Conservation. The Company sold the business previously operated at the property it owns in Saltzburg, Pennsylvania (“Federal Labs”). At September 30, 2011, the reserve for environmental liabilities at Federal Labs was $5,887. The Company expects that remediation at this site, which is subject to the oversight of the Pennsylvania authorities, will not be completed for several years, and that monitoring costs, although expected to be incurred over twenty years, could extend for up to thirty years. There are other properties that have a combined environmental liability of $4,332. In addition, the Company has been named as a potentially responsible party in four environmental proceedings pending in several states in which it is alleged that the Company was a generator of waste that was sent to landfills and other treatment facilities. The Company estimates that expected future costs, and the estimated proportional share of remedial work to be performed associated with these proceedings, will not exceed $100 and has provided for these estimated costs in the Company’s accrual for environmental liabilities.

Litigation

The Company is also engaged in various other legal proceedings incidental to its business. It is the opinion of management that, after taking into consideration information furnished by its counsel, these matters will have no material effect on the Company’s financial position or the results of operations or cash flows in future periods.