15. LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN	12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Liquidity And Going Concern
LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN	During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company reported a net loss of ($1,594,800) and ($900,600), respectively and operating loss of ($1,620,900) and ($1,173,800), respectively. Historically, the Company had relied on the liquidation of its investment in Marketable Securities to fund working capital needs. The Company sold all remaining marketable securities during fiscal 2015. These factors raise doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the next year. The Company’s fiscal 2017 operating plan includes divestiture of the undeveloped AES Indian Mesa site which is currently classified as Assets Held for Sale. Management cannot assure that the sale of Indian Mesa will be finalized which would provide additional cash flow to the Company. The Company is continuing to analyze options to monetize current and future operations of Deer Creek. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to execute options for Deer Creek. The Company announced it is entering the behavioral health market and the business plan includes the acquisition of behavioral health businesses which requires capital. There is no assurance the Company will be able to raise additional financing which may be in the form of public or private debt or equity financing, or both. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company’s business, operating results, financial condition and ability to continue operations may be materially adversely affected. Management has historically been successful in obtaining financing and has demonstrated the ability to implement a number of cost-cutting initiatives to reduce working capital needs. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate and do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph in their audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 discussing the substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

15. LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2016

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company reported a net loss of ($1,594,800) and ($900,600), respectively and operating loss of ($1,620,900) and ($1,173,800), respectively. Historically, the Company had relied on the liquidation of its investment in Marketable Securities to fund working capital needs. The Company sold all remaining marketable securities during fiscal 2015. These factors raise doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the next year. The Company’s fiscal 2017 operating plan includes divestiture of the undeveloped AES Indian Mesa site which is currently classified as Assets Held for Sale. Management cannot assure that the sale of Indian Mesa will be finalized which would provide additional cash flow to the Company. The Company is continuing to analyze options to monetize current and future operations of Deer Creek. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to execute options for Deer Creek. The Company announced it is entering the behavioral health market and the business plan includes the acquisition of behavioral health businesses which requires capital. There is no assurance the Company will be able to raise additional financing which may be in the form of public or private debt or equity financing, or both. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Company’s business, operating results, financial condition and ability to continue operations may be materially adversely affected. Management has historically been successful in obtaining financing and has demonstrated the ability to implement a number of cost-cutting initiatives to reduce working capital needs. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate and do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. As a result, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph in their audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 discussing the substantial doubt of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.