-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
GhsI8M/wdo+RaMCleh0kZG7MqYor4itgrtEGgwdPZyEYrULVYhBakUx8ma9Qvj/B
pBQVQycLo8qcJ4xZyWrwbA==
financial summary (Thousands of dollars, except per share data) quarterly financial data (Thousands of dollars, except per share data) (Thousands of dollars, except per share data) (1) Annual earnings per share do not equal the sum of the individual quarters due to
differences in the average number of shares outstanding during the respective periods. UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________________ to ____________________
Commission File Number 1-1169
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
______________________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio 34-0577130
________________________________________ ___________________
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1835 Dueber Avenue, S.W., Canton, Ohio 44706-2798
________________________________________ ___________________
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (330)438-3000
___________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on Which Registered
Common Stock without par value New York Stock Exchange
______________________________ _______________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES [X] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X].
i
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by all shareholders
other than shareholders identified under item 12 of this Form 10-K as of
February 15, 2002, was $789,532,334 (representing 48,887,451 shares).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes
of Common Stock, as of February 15, 2002.
Common Stock without par value--59,917,751 shares (representing a market
value of $967,671,679).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended
December 31, 2001, are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II.
Portions of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to
be held on April 16, 2002, are incorporated by reference into parts III
and IV.
Exhibit Index may be found on Pages 18 through 23.
ii
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
INDEX TO FORM 10-K REPORT
PAGE
----
I. PART I.
Item 1. Description of Business.................................... 1
General.................................................. 2
Products................................................. 2
Sales and Distribution................................... 3
Industry Segments........................................ 4
Competition.............................................. 5
Backlog.................................................. 6
Raw Materials............................................ 6
Research................................................. 7
Environmental Matters.................................... 7
Patents, Trademarks and Licenses......................... 8
Employment............................................... 8
Executive Officers of the Registrant..................... 8
Item 2. Properties................................................. 12
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.......................................... 13
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........ 13
II. PART II.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters........................................ 14
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.................................... 14
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations........................ 14
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. 16
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................ 16
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure................................... 17
III. Part III.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant......... 17
Item 11. Executive Compensation..................................... 17
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management................................................. 17
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............. 17
IV. Part IV.
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on
Form 8-K................................................... 18
PART 1 1
______
Item 1. Description of Business
________________________________
Certain statements set forth in this document (including the company's fore-
casts, beliefs and expectations) that are not historical in nature are
"forward-looking" statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The company cautions readers that actual
results may differ materially from those projected or implied in forward-
looking statements made by or on behalf of the company due to a variety of
important factors, such as:
a) changes in world economic conditions, including additional adverse
effects from terrorism or hostilities. This includes, but is not
limited to, the potential instability of governments and legal systems
in countries in which the company or its customers conduct business and
significant changes in currency valuations.
b) the effects of changes in customer demand on sales, product mix and
prices. This includes the effects of customer strikes, the impact of
changes in industrial business cycles and whether conditions of fair
trade continue in the U.S. market, in light of the U.S. International
Trade Commission (ITC) voting in second quarter 2000 to revoke the
antidumping orders on imports of tapered roller bearings from Japan,
Romania and Hungary.
c) competitive factors, including changes in market penetration,
increasing price competition by existing or new foreign and domestic
competitors, the introduction of new products by existing and new
competitors and new technology that may impact the way the company's
products are sold or distributed.
d) changes in operating costs. This includes the effect of changes in
the company's manufacturing processes; changes in costs associated
with varying levels of operations; changes resulting from inventory
management and cost reduction initiatives and different levels of
customer demands; the effects of unplanned work stoppages; changes in
the cost of labor and benefits; and the cost and availability of raw
materials and energy.
e) the success of the company's operating plans, including its ability to
achieve the benefits from its global restructuring, manufacturing
transformation, and administrative cost reduction as well as its
ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs; its
ability to integrate acquisitions into company operations; the ability
of acquired companies to achieve satisfactory operating results; its
ability to maintain appropriate relations with unions that represent
company associates in certain locations in order to avoid disruptions
of business and its ability to successfully implement its new
organizational structure.
f) unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments. This includes, but
is not limited to, claims or problems related to intellectual property,
product warranty and environmental issues.
g) changes in worldwide financial markets to the extent they (1) affect
the company's ability or costs to raise capital, (2) have an impact on
the overall performance of the company's pension fund investments and
(3) cause changes in the economy which affect customer demand.
2
The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
General
_______
As used herein the term "Timken" or the "company" refers to The Timken
Company and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires. Timken,
an outgrowth of a business originally founded in 1899, was incorporated
under the laws of Ohio in 1904.
Products
________
The Timken Company manufactures two basic product lines: anti-friction
bearings and steel. Differentiation in these two product lines comes in two
different ways: (1) Differentiation by bearing type or steel type and,
(2) Differentiation in the applications of bearings and steel.
In bearings, Timken is best known for the tapered roller bearing, which was
originally patented by the company founder, Henry Timken. Basically, the
tapered roller bearing made by Timken is its principal product in the anti-
friction industry segment. It consists of four components: (1) the cone or
inner race, (2) the cup or outer race, (3) the tapered rollers which roll
between the cup and cone, and (4) the cage which serves as a retainer and
maintains proper spacing between the rollers. These four components are
manufactured or purchased and are sold in a wide variety of configurations
and sizes. The applications for tapered roller bearings have diversified
from the original application on horse-drawn wagons to applications on
passenger cars, light and heavy trucks, trains, as well as a wide range of
industrial applications, ranging from very small gear drives to bearings
over two meters in diameter for wind energy machines. Further differenti-
ation has come in the form of adding sensors to these bearings, which
measure parameters such as speed, load, temperature or overall bearing
health. Matching bearings to service requirements of customers' appli-
cations requires engineering, and often sophisticated analytical techniques.
The design of every tapered roller bearing made by Timken permits distri-
bution of unit pressures over the full length of the roller. This fact,
coupled with its tapered design, high precision tolerance and proprietary
internal geometry and premium quality material, provides a bearing with high
load carrying capacity, excellent friction-reducing qualities and long life.
The bearing product line has expanded in recent years with the addition of
Timken Aerospace and Super Precision facilities, which produce high-perform-
ance ball and cylindrical bearings for ultra high-speed and/or high-accuracy
applications in aerospace, medical/dental, computer disk drives and other
industries. They utilize ball and straight rolling elements and are in the
super precision end of the general ball and straight roller bearing product
range in the bearing industry. A majority of Timken Aerospace & Super
Precision Bearings' products are special custom-designed bearings and spindle
assemblies. They often involve specialized materials and coatings for use
in applications that subject the bearings to extreme operating conditions
of speed and temperature.
In addition, the Timken Romania facility produces high-quality spherical and
cylindrical bearings to expand application opportunities in large gear
drives, rolling mills and other process industry and infrastructure-develop-
3
Products (cont.)
________________
ment projects. Timken also produces custom-designed products called SpexxTM
performance Bearings. The product line includes both tapered and
cylindrical roller bearings and provides cost-effective solutions for
selective applications. The company produces the Timken IsoClassTM brand of
tapered roller bearings, which gives Timken access to 95% of the demand for
ISO tapered roller bearings, which are about one half of today's total
tapered roller bearing sales.
In addition to bearing products, Timken provides bearing reconditioning
services for industrial and railroad customers, both globally and
domestically. These services account for less than 3% of the company's net
sales for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Steel products include steels of low and intermediate alloy, vacuum-
processed alloys, tool steel and some carbon grades. These are available
in a wide range of solid and tubular sections with a variety of finishes.
These steel products are used in a wide array of applications, from bearings
to automotive transmissions; from engine crankshafts to special corrosion-
resistant, down-hole seamless tubing for oil drilling, as well as aerospace
and other similarly demanding applications.
The company also produces custom-made steel products including precision
steel components for automotive and industrial customers. The precision
steel components business has provided the company with the opportunity
to further expand its market for tubing and capture more higher-value steel
sales. This also enables the company's traditional tubing customers in the
automotive and bearing industries to take advantage of higher-performing
components that cost less than those they now use. This activity is a
growing portion of the Steel business.
Sales and Distribution
______________________
Timken's products in the Automotive Bearings and Industrial Bearings
segments are sold principally by its own sales organization. A major
portion of the shipments are made directly from Timken's warehouses located
in a number of cities in the United States, Canada, England, France, Mexico,
Singapore, Argentina and Australia. A growing number of shipments are made
directly from plant locations. The warehouse inventories are augmented by
authorized distributor and jobber inventories throughout the world that
provide local availability when service is required.
In January 2001, the company formed a joint venture in North America focused
on joint logistics and e-business services. This alliance is called Colinx,
and was founded by Timken, SKF, INA and Rockwell Automation. The e-business
service was launched in April 2001, and is focused on information and
business services for authorized distributors in the Industrial Bearings
segment. The joint logistics services, and how Timken might participate,
were studied during 2001, with action plans to be implemented in 2002 and
beyond.
The company operates an Export Service Center in Atlanta, Georgia, which
specializes in the export of tapered roller bearings for the replacement
markets in the Caribbean, Central and South America and other regions.
4
Sales and Distribution (cont.)
______________________________
Timken's tapered roller bearings and other bearing types are used in general
industry and in a wide variety of products including passenger cars, trucks,
railroad cars and locomotives, machine tools, rolling mills and farm and
construction equipment. Timken Aerospace & Super Precision Bearings' pro-
ducts, which are at the super precision end of the general ball and straight
roller bearing segment, are used in aircraft, missile guidance systems,
computer peripherals, and medical/dental instruments.
During 2001, progress was made in transitioning the European logistics
center located in Strasbourg, France. The facility is managed and operated
by Timken associates. Further investments and consolidation of European
logistics into Strasbourg were studied in 2001, with additional consol-
idation expected to occur in 2002 and beyond. Also, the company formed
another e-business joint venture in Europe in January 2001. This alliance
is called Endorsia and was founded by Timken, SKF, INA, Sandvik and Rockwell
Automation. The e-business service was launched in October 2001, and is
focused on information and business services for authorized distributors in
the Industrial Bearings segment.
A significant portion of Timken's steel production is consumed in its
bearing operations. In addition, sales are made to other anti-friction
bearing companies and to the aircraft, automotive and truck, construction,
forging, oil and gas drilling and tooling industries. Sales are also made
to steel service centers. Timken's steel products are sold principally by
its own sales organization. Most orders are custom made to satisfy specific
customer applications and are shipped directly to customers from Timken's
steel manufacturing plants.
Timken has a number of customers in the automotive industry, including
both manufacturers and suppliers. However, Timken feels that because of
the size of that industry, the diverse bearing applications, and the
fact that its business is spread among a number of customers, both
foreign and domestic, in original equipment manufacturing and aftermarket
distribution, its relationship with the automotive industry is well
diversified.
Timken has entered into individually negotiated contracts with some of
its customers in its Automotive Bearings, Industrial Bearings and Steel
segments. These contracts may extend for one or more years and, if a price
is fixed for any period extending beyond current shipments, customarily
include a commitment by the customer to purchase a designated percentage
of its requirements from Timken. Contracts extending beyond one year that
are not subject to price adjustment provisions do not represent a material
portion of Timken's sales. Timken does not believe that there is any
significant loss of earnings risk associated with any given contract.
Industry Segments
_________________
The company has three reportable segments: Automotive Bearings, Industrial
Bearings and Steel. Segment information in Note 12 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 36 and 37 of the Annual Report
to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2001, are incorporated
5
Industry Segments (cont.)
_________________________
herein by reference. Export sales from the U.S. and Canada are not
separately stated since such sales amount to less than 10% of revenue. The
company's Automotive and Industrial Bearings' businesses have historically
participated in the worldwide bearing markets while Steel has concentrated
on U.S. customers. However, over the past few years, Steel has acquired
foreign companies, such as Timken Desford Steel, in Leicester, England, a
manufacturer of seamless mechanical tubing and Lecheres Industries SAS
(Lecheres), the parent company of Bamarec S.A., a precision component
manufacturer based in France. Lecheres was aquired in November 2001.
Timken's non-U.S. operations are subject to normal international business
risks not generally applicable to domestic business. These risks include
currency fluctuation, changes in tariff restrictions, and restrictive
regulations by foreign governments, including price and exchange controls.
Both the anti-friction Automotive and Industrial Bearings' businesses and
the Steel business are extremely competitive. The principal competitive
factors involved, both in the United States and in foreign markets, include
price, product quality, service, delivery, order lead times and techno-
logical innovation.
Competition
___________
Timken manufactures an anti-friction bearing known as the tapered roller
bearing. The tapered principle of bearings made by Timken permits ready
absorption of both radial and axial loads in combination. For this
reason, they are particularly well-adapted to reducing friction where
shafts, gears or wheels are used. Timken also produces super precision
ball and straight roller bearings at its Timken Aerospace & Super
Precision Bearings subsidiary. With recent acquisitions, the company has
selectively expanded its product line to include other bearing types.
However, since the invention of the tapered roller bearing by its founder,
Timken has maintained primary focus in its product and process technology
on the tapered roller bearing segments. This has been important to its
ability to remain one of the leaders in the world's bearing industry.
This contrasts with the majority of Timken's major competitors who focus
more heavily on other bearing types such as ball, straight roller,
spherical roller and needle for the general industrial and automotive
markets and are, therefore, less specialized in the tapered roller bearing
segment. Timken competes with domestic manufacturers and many foreign
manufacturers of anti-friction bearings.
The anti-friction bearing business is intensely competitive in every
country in which Timken sells products. Substantial downward pricing
pressures exist in the United States and other countries even during periods
of significant demand.
In the second quarter of 2000, the ITC voted to revoke the industry's anti-
dumping orders on imports of tapered roller bearings from Japan, Romania and
Hungary. The ITC determined that revocation of the antidumping duty orders
on tapered roller bearings from those countries was not likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time. The ITC upheld the antidumping duty
6
Competition (cont.)
___________________
order against China. The company has filed an appeal of the ITC's decision
regarding Japan, which is still pending. In June 2001, President Bush
directed the ITC to initiate an investigation on steel imports under Section
201 of U.S. trade law, urging multilateral negotiations to reduce global
excess steel capacity and calling for multilateral negotiations to address
market-distorting factors in the world steel trade. In late October, the
ITC voted and affirmed 6-0 that injury had been caused by surges of low
priced imports of hot-rolled and cold-finished bars. The vote for tool
steels was 3-3. On March 5, 2002, President Bush announced that the U.S.
would impose tariffs on hot and cold-finished bar imports. The remedy for
these product categories is three years of tariffs at 30%, 24% and 18%.
Hot-rolled bars are a major product line for the company's Steel business,
which also manufactures some cold-finished bar products. Steel made in
Mexico, Canada and developing nations are generally exempt from the tariffs
announced. No relief was granted with respect to tool steels, which is a
major product line for the Timken Latrobe Steel subsidiary in Latrobe,
Pennsylvania.
In December 2001, the company received a $31.0 million payment from the U.S.
Treasury Department under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act
(Act). This payment resulted from the requirement in the Act that dumping
duties collected by the U.S. Customs Service be distributed to domestic pro-
ducers, and is related to the company's Automotive and Industrial Bearings'
segments.
Timken manufactures carbon and alloy seamless tubing, carbon and alloy steel
solid bars, tool steels and other custom-made specialty steel products.
Specialty steels are characterized by special chemistry, tightly controlled
melting and precise processing.
Maintaining high standards of product quality and reliability while keeping
production costs competitive is essential to Timken's ability to compete
with domestic and foreign manufacturers in both the anti-friction bearing
and steel businesses.
Backlog
_______
The backlog of orders of Timken's domestic and overseas operations is
estimated to have been $1.01 billion at December 31, 2001, and $1.13 billion
at December 31, 2000. Actual shipments are dependent upon ever-changing
production schedules of the customer. Accordingly, Timken does not believe
that its backlog data and comparisons thereof as of different dates are
reliable indicators of future sales or shipments.
Raw Materials
_____________
The principal raw materials used by Timken in its North American plants to
manufacture bearings are its own steel tubing and bars and purchased strip
steel. Outside North America, the company purchases raw materials from local
sources with whom it has worked closely to assure steel quality according
7
Raw Materials (cont.)
_____________________
to its demanding specifications. In addition, Timken Desford Steel, in
Leicester, England is a major source of raw materials for the Timken plants
in Western Europe.
The principal raw materials used by Timken in steel manufacturing are scrap
metal, nickel and other alloys. Timken believes that the availability of
raw materials and alloys are adequate for its needs, and, in general, it
is not dependent on any single source of supply.
Research
________
Timken's major research center, located in Stark County, Ohio near its
worldwide headquarters, is engaged in research on bearings, steels, manu-
facturing methods and related matters. Research facilities are also located
at the Timken Aerospace & Super Precision Bearings New Hampshire plants; the
Colmar, France plant; the Latrobe, Pennsylvania plant; the Ploiesti, Romania
plant; and the facility in Bangelore, India. Expenditures for research,
development and testing amounted to approximately $54,000,000 in 2001,
$52,000,000 in 2000, and $50,000,000 in 1999. The company's research
program is committed to the development of new and improved bearing and
steel products, as well as more efficient manufacturing processes and tech-
niques and the expansion of application of existing products.
Environmental Matters
_____________________
The company continues to protect the environment and comply with
environmental protection laws. Additionally, it has invested in pollution
control equipment and updated plant operational practices. The company is
committed to implementing a documented environmental management system
worldwide and to becoming certified under the ISO 14001 standard to meet or
exceed customer requirements. By the end of 2001, the company's plants in
Leicester, England; Sosnowiec, Poland; Jamshedpur, India; and Iron Station,
North Carolina had obtained ISO 14001 certification.
It is difficult to assess the possible effect of compliance with future
requirements that differ from existing ones. As previously reported,
the company is unsure of the future financial impact to the company that
could result from the United States Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA's) final rules to tighten the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
for fine particulate and ozone.
The company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries have been designated as
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) by the United States EPA for site
investigation and remediation at certain sites under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund). The
claims for remediation have been asserted against numerous other entities,
which are believed to be financially solvent and are expected to fulfill
their proportionate share of the obligation. Management believes any
ultimate liability with respect to all pending actions will not materially
affect the company's operations, cash flows or consolidated financial
position. Furthermore, the company believes it has established adequate
reserves to cover its environmental expenses and has a well-established
environmental compliance audit program, which includes a proactive approach
8
Environmental Matters (cont.)
_____________________________
to bringing its domestic and international units to higher standards of
environmental performance. This program measures performance against local
laws as well as standards that have been established for all units
worldwide.
Patents, Trademarks and Licenses
________________________________
Timken owns a number of United States and foreign patents, trademarks
and licenses relating to certain of its products. While Timken regards
these as items of importance, it does not deem its business as a whole,
or any industry segment, to be materially dependent upon any one item
or group of items.
Employment
__________
At December 31, 2001, Timken had 18,735 associates. Thirty-one percent
of Timken's U.S. associates are covered under collective bargaining
agreements. Three percent of Timken's U.S. associates are covered under
collective bargaining agreements that expire within one year.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
____________________________________
The officers are elected by the Board of Directors normally for a term
of one year and until the election of their successors. All officers,
except for two, have been employed by Timken or by a subsidiary of the
company during the past five-year period. The Executive Officers of the
company as of February 15, 2002, are as follows:
Current Position and Previous
Name Age Positions During Last Five Years
___________________ ___ ____________________________________________
W. R. Timken, Jr. 63 1996 Chairman - Board of Directors;
1997 Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer; Director;
1999 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
Director; Officer since 1968.
J. W. Griffith 48 1996 Vice President - Bearings - North
American Automotive, Rail, Asia
Pacific and Latin America;
1998 Group Vice President - Bearings -
North American Automotive, Asia
Pacific and Latin America;
1999 President and Chief Operating Officer;
Director; Officer since 1996.
B. J. Bowling 60 1996 Executive Vice President and President
- Steel;
1997 Executive Vice President, Chief
Operating Officer and President -
Steel; Officer since 1996.
9
Executive Officers of the Registrant (cont.)
____________________________________________
Current Position and Previous
Name Age Positions During Last Five Years
___________________ ___ ____________________________________________
C. J. Andersson 40 1996 Manager of Global Sourcing and Asset
Management, Power Generation Manu-
facturing (General Electric Company);
1997 General Manager - Mexico Sourcing and
Business Development, GE International
Mexico (General Electric Company);
1999 General Manager - Aviation Information
Services, GE Aircraft Engines (General
Electric Company);
2000 Senior Vice President - e-Business, The
Timken Company;
2001 Senior Vice President - e-Business and
Lean Six Sigma, The Timken Company;
Officer since 2000.
M. C. Arnold 45 1996 Director - Manufacturing and Technology -
Europe, Africa and West Asia;
1997 Director - Bearing Business Process
Advancement;
1998 Vice President - Bearings - Business
Process Advancement;
2000 President - Industrial; Officer since
2000.
S. B. Bailey 42 1996 Director - Finance;
1999 Director - Finance and Treasurer;
2000 Treasurer;
2001 Corporate Controller; Officer since 1999.
W. R. Burkhart 36 1996 Corporate Attorney
1997 Legal Counsel - Europe, Africa and West
Asia;
1998 Director of Affiliations and Acquisitions
2000 Senior Vice President and General Counsel;
Officer since 2000.
V. K. Dasari 35 1996 Director - Manufacturing and Technology -
Tata Timken Limited;
1998 Deputy Managing Director - Tata Timken
Limited;
1999 Managing Director - Tata Timken Limited;
2000 President - Rail;
2001 Corporate Vice President - Manufacturing
Transformation; Officer since 2000.
D. J. Demerling 51 1996 Stanford Sloan Fellow;
1997 President - MPB Corporation;
2000 President - Aerospace and Super Precision;
Officer since 2000.
10
Executive Officers of the Registrant (cont.)
____________________________________________
Current Position and Previous
Name Age Positions During Last Five Years
___________________ ___ ____________________________________________
G. A. Eisenberg 40 1996 Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, United Dominion
Industries;
1998 President - Test Instrumentation Segment;
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, United Dominion
Industries;
1999 President and Chief Operating Officer,
United Dominion Industries;
2002 Executive Vice President - Finance and
Administration, The Timken Company;
Officer since 2002.
J. T. Elsasser 49 1996 Vice President - Bearings - Europe,
Africa and West Asia;
1998 Group Vice President - Bearings -
Rail, Europe, Africa and West Asia;
1999 Senior Vice President - Corporate
Development; Officer since 1996.
K. P. Kimmerling 44 1996 Vice President - Manufacturing -
Steel;
1998 Group Vice President - Alloy Steel;
1999 President - Automotive; Officer since
1998.
G. E. Little 58 1996 Vice President - Finance; Treasurer;
1998 Senior Vice President - Finance;
Treasurer;
1999 Senior Vice President - Finance; Officer
since 1990.
S. J. Miraglia, Jr. 51 1996 Vice President - Bearings - North
American Industrial and Super
Precision;
1998 Group Vice President - Bearings -
North American Industrial and Super
Precision;
1999 Senior Vice President - Technology;
Officer since 1996.
H. J. Sack 48 1996 President - Latrobe Steel Company;
1998 Group Vice President - Specialty Steel
and President - Latrobe Steel
Company;
1999 Group Vice President - Specialty Steel
and President - Timken Latrobe Steel;
2000 President - Specialty Steel; Officer
since 1998.
11
Executive Officers of the Registrant (cont.)
____________________________________________
Current Position and Previous
Name Age Positions During Last Five Years
___________________ ___ ____________________________________________
M. J. Samolczyk 46 1996 Vice President - Sales and Marketing -
Industrial - Original Equipment;
1998 Vice President and General Manager -
Precision Steel Components;
2000 President - Precision Steel Components;
Officer since 2000.
S. A. Scherff 48 1996 Director - Legal Services and Assistant
Secretary;
1999 Corporate Secretary;
2000 Corporate Secretary and Assistant General
Counsel; Officer since 1999.
W. J. Timken 59 1996 Vice President; Director; Officer
since 1992.
W. J. Timken, Jr. 34 1996 Market Manager - Original Equipment
Distribution - Europe, Africa and West
Asia
1998 Vice President - Latin America
2000 Corporate Vice President - Office of the
Chairman; Officer since 2000.
12
Item 2. Properties
___________________
Timken has Automotive and Industrial Bearing and Steel manufacturing
facilities at multiple locations in the United States. Timken also has
Automotive and Industrial Bearing and Steel manufacturing facilities in a
number of countries outside the United States. The aggregate floor area of
these facilities worldwide is approximately 13,790,000 square feet, all of
which, except for approximately 1,688,000 square feet, is owned in fee. The
facilities not owned in fee are leased. The buildings occupied by Timken
are principally of brick, steel, reinforced concrete and concrete block
construction. All buildings are in satisfactory operating condition in
which to conduct business.
Timken's Automotive and Industrial Bearing manufacturing facilities in the
United States are located in Ashland, Bucyrus, Canton and New Philadelphia,
Ohio; Altavista, Virginia; Randleman and Iron Station, North Carolina;
Carlyle, Illinois; South Bend, Indiana; Gaffney, South Carolina; Keene and
Lebanon, New Hampshire; Winchester, Kentucky; Knoxville, Tennessee; Lenexa,
Kansas; Ogden, Utah; Orange and Sanford, California. These facilities,
including the research facility in Canton, Ohio, and warehouses at plant
locations, have an aggregate floor area of approximately 4,404,000 square
feet. As part of the management strategy initiative announced in April
2001, the company announced that it was closing the Industrial Bearing
plant in Columbus, Ohio and selling a tooling plant in Ashland, Ohio.
The Columbus plant ceased operations on November 9, which decreased floor
area by approximately 388,000 square feet.
Timken's Automotive and Industrial Bearing manufacturing plants outside the
United States are located in Benoni, South Africa; Brescia, Italy; Colmar,
France; Duston, Northampton and Wolverhampton, England; Medemblik, The
Netherlands; Ploiesti, Romania; Mexico City, Mexico; Sao Paulo, Brazil;
Singapore; Jamshedpur, India; Sosnowiec, Poland; St. Thomas, Canada and
Yantai, China. The facilities, including warehouses at plant locations,
have an aggregate floor area of approximately 3,690,000 square feet. The
company announced in March, 2001 the opening of a bearing reconditioning
facility in Mexico City as part of its Timken de Mexico operations. The
Industrial Bearing service facility will remanufacture railroad bearings
used in locomotives and freight cars. In April 2001, the company announced
that it was also closing the Automotive Bearing plant in Duston, England.
This plant is scheduled to close in mid-2002.
Timken's Steel manufacturing facilities in the United States are located
in Canton, Eaton, Wauseon and Wooster, Ohio; Columbus, North Carolina;
Franklin and Latrobe, Pennsylvania. These facilities have an aggregate
floor area of approximately 4,942,000 square feet.
Timken's Steel manufacturing facilities outside the United States are
located in Leicester and Sheffield, England; Fougeres and Marnaz, France.
These facilities have an aggregate floor of approximately 754,000 square
feet.
In addition to the manufacturing and distribution facilities discussed
above, Timken owns warehouses and steel distribution facilities in the
United States, Canada, England, France, Singapore, Mexico, Argentina and
Australia, and leases several relatively small warehouse facilities in
cities throughout the world.
13
Properties (cont.)
__________________
During 2001, the global demand for automotive and industrial bearings
decreased from 2000. Automotive and Industrial plant utilization declined
as a result of the overall manufacturing recession. Steel plant utilization
also decreased during 2001 in response to weakened customer demand. Utili-
zation was curtailed even further as the Steel business took actions to
control inventory and curtail spending.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
__________________________
On May 22, 2001, eight current or former employees of the company filed a
lawsuit in the Court of Common Pleas, Stark County, Ohio against the company
and fifteen current or former employees of the company. The lawsuit was
removed to the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division on June 20, 2001. The lawsuit alleged, among other things,
sexual harassment and employment discrimination. The plaintiffs sought
compensatory and punitive damages of approximately $95 million.
During the third quarter of 2001, this case was dismissed, without pre-
judice, pursuant to a sua sponte order of the presiding judge. In February
2002, the lawsuit was refiled in the Court of Common Pleas, Stark County,
Ohio, by two of the original plaintiffs naming only the company as a
defendant. The allegations contained in the complaint are similar to those
made in the May 22, 2001 filing. The new lawsuit does not specify the
amount of damages the plaintiffs are seeking.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
____________________________________________________________
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.
14
PART II
_______
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
______________________________________________________________________
Matters
_______
The company's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (TKR).
The estimated number of record holders of the company's common stock at
December 31, 2001, was 8,109. The estimated number of shareholders at
December 31, 2001, was 39,919.
High and low stock prices and dividends for the last two fiscal years are
presented in the Quarterly Financial Data schedule on Page 1 of the Annual
Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2001, and are
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
________________________________
The Summary of Operations and Other Comparative Data on Pages 40-41 of the
Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2001, is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
________________________________________________________________________
Results of Operations
_____________________
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations on Pages 20-27 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year
ended December 31, 2001, is incorporated herein by reference.
On February 13, 2002, Standard & Poor's ("S&P") publicly announced that it
had lowered the company's long-term senior debt rating to "BBB" from "A-."
At the same time, S&P announced that the company's ratings were removed
from "CreditWatch," and that the outlook is now "stable." The company's
"A-2" short-term corporate credit and commercial paper ratings, which were
not on CreditWatch, were affirmed.
On March 5, 2002, President Bush announced that the U.S. would impose
tariffs on hot and cold-finished bar imports. The remedy for these product
categories is three years of tariffs at 30%, 24% and 18%. Hot-rolled bars
are a major product line for the company's Steel business, which also manu-
factures some cold-finished bar products. Steel made in Mexico, Canada and
developing nations are generally exempt from the tariffs announced. No
relief was granted with respect to tool steels, which is a major product
line for the Timken Latrobe Steel subsidiary in Latrobe, Pennsylvania.
On March 15, 2002, the company acquired an industrial equipment repair
facility located in Niles, Ohio. The 60,000 square foot plant specializes
in the repair and rebuild of chocks, chock overlays, rolls and roll
overlays, and other processing components commonly found in heavy
industrial mill applications.
15
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
________________________________________________________________________
Results of Operations (cont.)
_____________________________
On March 19, 2002, the company announced that it expects to report improved
financial performance above consensus estimates for the first quarter and
full year. The improvement is expected to result from increased revenues,
increased efficiency resulting from the company's restructuring efforts and
aggressive cost management. During the first quarter, the company has noted
stronger-than-expected U.S. automotive sector demand. The company has not,
however, observed a perceptible increase in broad-based manufacturing
activity. In 2002, the company is continuing with the global restructuring
of its manufacturing operations. The ongoing manufacturing initiative,
combined with the salaried workforce reduction that occurred in the second
half of 2001, is expected to produce an annualized savings rate of
$80 million by the end of 2002.
Critical Accounting Policies
____________________________
The company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with account-
ing principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of
these financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the periods presented. The following paragraphs include a
discussion of some critical areas that require a higher degree of judgement,
estimates and complexity:
The company's revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenue when title
passes to the customer. This is generally FOB shipping point except for
certain exported goods, which is FOB destination. Selling prices are fixed
based on purchase orders or contractual arrangements. Write-offs of
accounts receivable have historically been low.
It is the company's policy to recognize restructuring costs in accordance
with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for
Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity
(including Certain Costs incurred in a Restructuring)" and the SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 100, "Restructuring and Impairment Charges."
Detailed contemporaneous documentation is maintained and updated on a
monthly basis to ensure that accruals are properly supported. If management
determines that there is a change in the estimate, the accruals are adjusted
to reflect this change.
The company sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans which cover
most associates, except for those at certain locations who are covered by
government plans. The company also sponsors several unfunded postretirement
plans that provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible
retirees and dependents. The measurement of liabilities related to these
plans is based on management's assumptions related to future events
including return on pension plan assets, rate of compensation increases and
health care cost trend rates. The discount rate is determined using a model
that matches corporate bond securities against projected pension and post-
retirement disbursements. Actual pension plan asset performance will either
reduce or increase unamortized pension losses at the end of 2002, which
ultimately affects net income.
16
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
________________________________________________________________________
Results of Operations (cont.)
_____________________________
In previous years, the company had two reportable segments consisting of
Bearings and Steel. Based on the company's reorganization into global
business units, management has determined that the Automotive Bearings and
Industrial Bearings segments meet the quantitative and qualitative
thresholds of a reporting segment as defined by SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information."
New Accounting Standards
________________________
The specifics related to SFAS No. 141 and 142 are discussed on page 29 of
the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2001, and
are incorporated herein by reference. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, the
goodwill resulting from the November 2001 purchase of Lecheres Industries
SAS has not been amortized. Beginning in the first quarter of 2002, the
application of the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 is expected
to result in an increase in annual net income of $6.1 million. Changes in
the estimated useful lives of intangible assets will not result in a
material increase to net income.
The company will test goodwill for impairment using the two-step process
described in SFAS No. 142. The company has identified five reporting units
and plans to complete the analysis for potential impairment in the second
quarter of 2002. It is expected that the measurement of the transitional
goodwill impairment will also be completed in the second quarter and
reflected as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
____________________________________________________________________
Information appearing under the caption "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Other Information" appearing on page 27 of the Annual
Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2001, is
incorporated herein by reference.
The company has no update to the information provided in the Annual Report.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
____________________________________________________
The Quarterly Financial Data schedule included on Page 1, the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the registrant and its subsidiaries
on Pages 20-28, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on Pages
29-38, and the Report of Independent Auditors on Page 39 of the Annual
Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2001, are
incorporated herein by reference.
17
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
____________________________________________________________________
and Financial Disclosure
________________________
Not applicable.
PART III
________
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
____________________________________________________________
Required information is set forth under the caption "Election of
Directors" on Pages 4-7 of the proxy statement filed in connection with
the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 16, 2002, and is
incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding the executive
officers of the registrant is included in Part I hereof.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
________________________________
Required information is set forth under the caption "Executive
Compensation" on Pages 10-20 of the proxy statement filed in connection
with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 16, 2002, and
is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
________________________________________________________________________
Required information regarding Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management, including institutional investors owning more
than 5% of the company's Common Stock, is set forth under the caption
"Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock" on Pages 8-9 of the proxy
statement filed in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders
to be held April 16, 2002, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
________________________________________________________
Required information is set forth under the caption "Election of
Directors" on Pages 4-7 of the proxy statement issued in connection with
the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 16, 2002, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
18
PART IV
_______
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
___________________________________________________________________________
(a)(1) and (2) - The response to this portion of Item 14 is submitted
as a separate section of this report.
Schedules I, III, IV and V are not applicable to the company and, therefore,
have been omitted.
(3) Listing of Exhibits
Exhibit
_______
(3)(i) Amended Articles of Incorporation of The Timken Company
(Effective April 16, 1996) were filed with Form S-8 dated
April 16, 1996 (Registration Number 333-02553) and are
incorporated herein by reference.
(3)(ii) Amended Regulations of The Timken Company effective April
21, 1987, were filed on March 29, 1993 with Form 10-K
(Commission File Number 1-1169), and are incorporated
herein by reference.
(4) Credit Agreement dated as of July 10, 1998 among The Timken
Company, as Borrower, Various Financial Institutions, as
Banks, and Keybank National Association, as Agent was filed
on August 13, 1998 with Form 10-Q (Commission File Number
1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(4.1) Indenture dated as of April 24, 1998, between The Timken
Company and The Bank of New York, which was filed with
Timken's Form S-3 registration statement which became
effective April 24, 1998 (Registration Number 333-45791),
and is incorporated herein by reference.
(4.2) Indenture dated as of July 1, 1990, between Timken and
Ameritrust Company of New York, which was filed with
Timken's Form S-3 registration statement dated July 12,
1990 (Registration Number 333-35773), and is incorporated
herein by reference.
(4.3) First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 24, 1996,
by and between The Timken Company and Mellon Bank, N.A.
was filed on November 13, 1996 with Form 10-Q (Commission
File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by
reference.
(4.4) First Amendment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2002 among
The Timken Company, as Borrower, Various Financial
Institutions, as Banks, and Keybank National Association,
as Agent.
19
Listing of Exhibits (cont.)
___________________________
(4.5) The company is also a party to agreements with respect
to other long-term debt in total amount less than 10%
of the registrant's consolidated total assets. The
registrant agrees to furnish a copy of such agreements
upon request.
Management Contracts and Compensation Plans
___________________________________________
(10) The Management Performance Plan of The Timken Company
for Officers and Certain Management Personnel.
(10.1) The form of Deferred Compensation Agreement entered
into with James W. Griffith, W. R. Timken, Jr., R. L.
Leibensperger and B. J. Bowling was filed on November 13,
1995 with Form 10-Q (Commission File Number 1-1169), and
is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.2) The Timken Company 1996 Deferred Compensation Plan for
officers and other key employees, amended and restated as
of April 20, 1999 was filed on May 13, 1999 with Form 10-Q
(Commission File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein
by reference.
(10.3) The Timken Company Long-Term Incentive Plan As Amended And
Restated As Of December 16, 1999, and approved by share-
holders April 18, 2000 was filed as Appendix A to Proxy
Statement filed on February 25, 2000 (Commission File
Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.4) The 1985 Incentive Plan of The Timken Company for Officers
and other key employees as amended through December 17,
1997 was filed on March 20, 1998 with Form 10-K (Commission
File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10.5) The form of Severance Agreement entered into with all
Executive Officers of the company was filed on March 27,
1997 with Form 10-K (Commission File Number 1-1169), and
is incorporated herein by reference. Each differs only as
to name and date executed.
(10.6) The form of Death Benefit Agreement entered into with all
Executive Officers of the company was filed on March 30,
1994 with Form 10-K (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is
incorporated herein by reference. Each differs only as to
name and date executed.
(10.7) The form of Indemnification Agreements entered into with
all Directors who are not Executive Officers of the company
was filed on April 1, 1991 with Form 10-K (Commission File
Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
Each differs only as to name and date executed.
Listing of Exhibits (cont.) 20
___________________________
Management Contracts and Compensation Plans (cont.)
___________________________________________________
(10.8) The form of Indemnification Agreements entered into with
all Executive Officers of the company who are not Directors
of the company was filed on April 1, 1991 with Form 10-K
(Commission File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein
by reference. Each differs only as to name and date
executed.
(10.9) The form of Indemnification Agreements entered into with
all Executive Officers of the company who are also
Directors of the company was filed on April 1, 1991 with
Form 10-K (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is
incorporated herein by reference. Each differs only as to
name and date executed.
(10.10) The form of Employee Excess Benefits Agreement entered into
with all active Executive Officers, certain retired
Executive Officers, and certain other key employees of the
company was filed on March 27, 1992 with Form 10-K
(Commission File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein
by reference. Each differs only as to name and date
executed.
(10.11) The Amended and Restated Supplemental Pension Plan of
The Timken Company as adopted March 16, 1998 was filed
on March 20, 1998 with Form 10-K (Commission File Number
1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.12) Amendment to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Pension
Plan of the Timken Company executed on December 29, 1998
was filed on March 30, 1999 with Form 10-K (Commission File
Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.13) The form of The Timken Company Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement for nontransferable options as adopted on April
18, 2000 was filed on May 12, 2000 with Form 10-Q
(Commission File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein
by reference.
(10.14) The form of The Timken Company Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement for transferable options as adopted on April 18,
2000 was filed on May 12, 2000 with Form 10-Q (Commission
File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10.15) The form of The Timken Company Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement for special award options as adopted on April 18,
2000 was filed on May 12, 2000 with Form 10-Q (Commission
File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by
reference.
(10.16) The Timken Company Deferral of Stock Option Gains Plan
effective as of April 21, 1998 was filed on May 14, 1998
with Form 10-Q (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is
incorporated herein by reference.
21
Listing of Exhibits (cont.)
___________________________
Management Contracts and Compensation Plans (cont.)
___________________________________________________
(10.17) The Consulting Agreement entered into with Joseph F.
Toot, Jr., effective January 1, 2001 was filed on March 30,
2001 with Form 10-K (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is
incorporated herein by reference.
(10.18) The form of The Timken Company Performance Share Agreement
entered into with W. R. Timken, Jr., R. L. Leibensperger
and B. J. Bowling was filed on March 20, 1998 with Form
10-K (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10.19) The Timken Company Senior Executive Management Performance
Plan effective January 1, 1999, and approved by
shareholders April 20, 1999 was filed as Appendix A to
Proxy Statement filed on February 29, 1999 (Commission File
Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.20) The Timken Company Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
entered into with James W. Griffith and adopted on
December 16, 1999 was filed on March 29, 2000 with Form
10-K (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated
herein by reference.
(10.21) The Timken Company Promissory Note entered into with James
W. Griffith and dated December 17, 1999 was filed on March
29, 2000 with Form 10-K (Commission File Number 1-1169),
and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.22) The Timken Company Director Deferred Compensation Plan
effective as of February 4, 2000 was filed on May 12, 2000
with Form 10-Q (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is
incorporated herein by reference.
(10.23) The form of The Timken Company Deferred Shares Agreement as
adopted on April 18, 2000 was filed on May 12, 2000 with
Form 10-Q (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is
incorporated herein by reference.
(10.24) Amendment to Employee Excess Benefits Agreement was filed
on May 12, 2000 with Form 10-Q (Commission File Number
1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.25) Consulting agreement entered into with Robert L.
Leibensperger was filed on August 11, 2000 with Form 10-Q
(Commission File Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein
by reference.
(10.26) Consulting agreement entered into with John Schubach was
filed on August 11, 2000 with Form 10-Q (Commission File
Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
22
Listing of Exhibits (cont.)
___________________________
Management Contracts and Compensation Plans (cont.)
___________________________________________________
(10.27) Consulting Agreement entered into with e-Solutions.biz, LLC
(Thomas W. Strouble, Owner and principal) was filed on
November 13, 2001 with Form 10-Q (Commission File Number
1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.28) The form of The Timken Company Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement for nontransferable options without dividend
credit as adopted on April 17, 2001 was filed on May 14,
2001 with Form 10-Q (Commission File Number 1-1169), and is
incorporated herein by reference.
(10.29) Retirement Agreement entered into with Stephen A. Perry was
filed on May 14, 2001 with Form 10-Q (Commission File
Number 1-1169), and is incorporated herein by reference.
(10.30) Restricted Shares Agreement entered into with Glenn A.
Eisenberg.
(10.31) Restricted Shares Agreement entered into with Curt J.
Andersson.
(12) Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(13) Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended
December 31, 2001, (only to the extent expressly
incorporated herein by reference).
(21) A list of subsidiaries of the registrant.
(23) Consent of Independent Auditors.
(24) Power of Attorney
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On March 20, 2002, the company filed a Form 8-K regarding
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, which contained
estimated market data and industry trend information relating
to a number of industry segments in which the company sells
bearing and steel products. No financial statements were
filed.
On February 22, 2002, the company filed a Form 8-K regarding
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, which contained
estimated market data and industry trend information relating
to a number of industry segments in which the company sells
bearing and steel products. No financial statements were
filed.
23
Listing of Exhibits (cont.)
___________________________
(b) Reports on Form 8-K (cont.):
On February 19, 2002, the company filed a Form 8-K regarding
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, which contained
a recent development of rating agency activity related to the
company's debt ratings. No financial statements were filed.
On January 22, 2002, the company filed a Form 8-K regarding
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, which contained
estimated market data and industry trend information relating
to a number of industry segments in which the company sells
bearing and steel products. No financial statements were
filed.
On December 21, 2001, the company filed a Form 8-K regarding
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, which contained
estimated market data and industry trend information relating
to a number of industry segments in which the company sells
bearing and steel products. No financial statements were
filed.
On December 19, 2001, the company filed a Form 8-K regarding
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, which contained a
press release announcing Glenn A. Eisenberg's election by the
company's board of directors as Executive Vice President -
Finance and Administration.
On November 30, 2001, the company filed a Form 8-K regarding
Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, which contained
estimated market data and industry trend information relating
to a number of industry segments in which the company sells
bearing and steel products. No financial statements were
filed.
(c) The exhibits are contained in a separate section of this report.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the company has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
By /s/ W. R. Timken, Jr. By /s/ Gene E. Little
________________________________ ________________________________
W. R. Timken, Jr., Gene E. Little
Director and Chairman and Chief Senior Vice President - Finance
Executive Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
Date March 28, 2002 Date March 28, 2002
________________________________ _______________________________
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By /s/ Stanley C. Gault* By /s/ John M. Timken, Jr.*
______________________________ _______________________________
Stanley C. Gault Director John M. Timken, Jr. Director
Date March 28, 2002 Date March 28, 2002
By /s/ J. Clayburn La Force, Jr.* By /s/ W. J. Timken*
______________________________ _______________________________
J. Clayburn La Force, Jr., Director W. J. Timken Director
Date March 28, 2002 Date March 28, 2002
By /s/ James W. Griffith* By /s/ Joseph F. Toot, Jr.*
______________________________ _______________________________
James W. Griffith, Director Joseph F. Toot, Jr. Director
Date March 28, 2002 Date March 28, 2002
By /s/ By /s/ Martin D. Walker*
______________________________ _______________________________
John A. Luke, Jr. Director Martin D. Walker Director
Date March 28, 2002 Date March 28, 2002
By /s/ Robert W. Mahoney* By /s/ Jacqueline F. Woods*
______________________________ _______________________________
Robert W. Mahoney Director Jacqueline F. Woods, Director
Date March 28, 2002 Date March 28, 2002
By /s/ Jay A. Precourt*
______________________________
Jay A. Precourt Director
Date March 28, 2002
By /s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg* By /s/ Gene E. Little
______________________________ ___________________________________
Glenn A. Eisenberg Gene E. Little, attorney-in-fact
Executive Vice President - By authority of Power of Attorney
Finance and Administration filed as Exhibit 24 hereto
Date March 28, 2002 Date March 28, 2002
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
ITEM 14(a)(1) AND (2), (c) AND (d)
LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
CERTAIN EXHIBITS
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
THE TIMKEN COMPANY
CANTON, OHIO
FORM 10-K-ITEM 14(a)(1) AND (2)
THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
The following consolidated financial statements of The Timken Company and
subsidiaries, included in the annual report of the registrant to its
shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2001, are incorporated by
reference in Item 8:
Consolidated statements of income-Years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
Consolidated balance sheets-December 31, 2001 and 2000
Consolidated statements of cash flows-Years ended December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999
Consolidated statements of shareholders' equity-Years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999
Notes to consolidated financial statements-December 31, 2001
The consolidated financial statement Schedule II-Valuation and qualifying
accounts of The Timken Company and subsidiaries is included in Item 14(d).
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting
regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under
the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.
Report of Independent Auditors
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
The Timken Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Timken
Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item
14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements and schedule. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement and schedule presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of The Timken Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Canton, Ohio
January 29, 2002
II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
COL. A COL. B COL. C COL. D COL. E
Additions
Balance at Charged to Charged to Other
Beginning of Costs and Accounts-- Deductions-- Balance at End
Description Period Expenses Describe Describe of Period
(Thousands of dollars)
Year ended December 31, 2001:
Reserves and allowances
deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for
uncollectible accounts $ 11,259 $ 10,025 (1) $ 6,308 (3) $ 14,976
Valuation allowance
on deferred tax assets 18,084 20,219 (2) 3,547 (4) 34,756
______ ______ ______ ______
$ 29,343 $ 30,244 $ 9,855 $ 49,732
====== ====== ====== ======
Year ended December 31, 2000:
Reserves and allowances
deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for
uncollectible accounts $ 9,497 $ 2,406 (1) $ 644 (3) $ 11,259
Valuation allowance
on deferred tax assets 15,041 11,543 (2) 8,500 (4) 18,084
______ ______ ______ ______
$ 24,538 $ 13,949 $ 9,144 $ 29,343
====== ====== ====== ======
Year ended December 31, 1999:
Reserves and allowances
deducted from asset accounts:
Allowance for
uncollectible accounts $ 7,949 $ 2,963 (1) $ 1,415 (3) $ 9,497
Valuation allowance
on deferred tax assets 14,367 1,407 (2) 733 (4) 15,041
______ ______ ______ ______
$ 22,316 $ 4,370 $ 2,148 $ 24,538
====== ====== ====== ======
(1) Provision for uncollectible accounts included in expenses.
(2) Increase in valuation allowance is recorded as a component of the provision for income taxes.
(3) Actual accounts written off against the allowance--net of recoveries.
(4) Reduction in valuation allowance due to utilization of foreign net operating losses previously
reserved or write-off of deferred tax assets that are not realizable in future years.
EXHIBIT 13
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
2001
2000
Net sales
Impairment and restructuring charges
(Loss) income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net (loss) income
Earnings per share
Earnings per share - assuming dilution
Dividends per share $ 2,447,178
54,689
(26,883)
14,783
$ (41,666)
$ (.69)
$ (.69)
$ .67$ 2,643,008
27,754
70,597
24,709
$ 45,888
$ .76
$ .76
$ .72
2001
Net
SalesGross
ProfitImpairment &
RestructuringNet
Income
(Loss) Earnings per Share(1)
Dividends
per Share
Basic
Diluted
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4 $ 661,516
634,389
577,698
573,575$ 118,014
111,083
90,951
80,672$ 7,907
16,859
24,639
5,284$ 2,222
(14,574)
(30,532)
1,218(2)$ .04
(.24)
(.51)
.02$ .04
(.24)
(.51)
.02$ .18
.18
.18
.13
$ 2,447,178
$ 400,720
$ 54,689
$ (41,666)
$ (.69)
$ (.69)
$ .67
2000
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4 $ 685,791
693,263
632,243
631,711 $ 144,965
142,476
109,545
103,887 $ 14,759
3,322
3,453
6,220 $ 16,040
21,240
7,685
923 $ .26
.35
.13
.02 $ .26
.35
.13
.02 $ .18
.18
.18
.18
$ 2,643,008
$ 500,873
$ 27,754
$ 45,888
$ .76
$ .76
$ .72
(2) Includes receipt of $31.0 million resulting from the U.S. Continued Dumping and
Subsidy Offset Act.
2001 Stock Prices |
2000 Stock Prices |
||
High | Low | High | Low |
$ 17.38 18.65 17.16 16.49 |
$ 14.63 14.89 11.75 13.04 |
$ 20.81 21.81 20.50 15.81 |
$ 13.50 15.50 13.56 12.56 |
1 |
consolidated statement of income
Year Ended December 31 | |||
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |
(Thousands of dollars, except per share data) |
|||
Net sales Cost of products sold |
$ 2,447,178 2,046,458 |
$ 2,643,008 2,142,135 |
$ 2,495,034 2,002,366 |
|
400,720 363,683 54,689 |
500,873 367,499 27,754 |
492,668 359,910 -0- |
|
(17,652) (33,401) 2,109 22,061 |
105,620 (31,922) 3,479 (6,580) |
132,758 (27,225) 3,096 (9,638) |
|
(26,883) 14,783 |
70,597 24,709 |
98,991 36,367 |
|
$ (41,666) | $ 45,888 | $ 62,624 |
|
$ (0.69) |
$ 0.76 |
$ 1.01 |
|
$ (0.69) | $ 0.76 | $ 1.01 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 29 through 38.
The U.S. industrial manufacturing recession deepened during
2001, causing a 7.4% drop in sales for the year, which impacted operating profits and
contributed to a net loss in 2001. In 2001, net sales were $2.447 billion, compared to
$2.643 billion in 2000. Through the end of 2001, the company recorded $67.3 million in restructuring and implementation charges related to its strategic global refocusing of manufacturing operations. These special charges related to both the $55 million restructuring program that concluded during the first quarter of 2001 and to the second phase announced in April 2001. Excluding these special charges and a receipt of $31.0 million resulting from the U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA), the company recorded in 2001 pretax income of $11.0 million (aftertax loss of $5.6 million). Including these items, the company reported a net loss of $41.7 million, compared with net income of $45.9 million in 2000. Cash increased by $22.5 million in 2001, and debt decreased to $497.0 million at the end of 2001, from $514.6 million a year ago. The company took aggressive actions during the year to lower inventories and control other costs to generate cash and reduce debt. Continuing weakness in global automotive and industrial demand and the U.S. manufacturing recession caused the 2001 decrease in sales and profit. Light vehicle production was down and truck production fell dramatically. Globally, shipments for industrial products fell in 2001. North American rail markets remained depressed, with railcar production at its lowest level since 1992. Aerospace and super precision sales increased modestly. Sales of steel products in all markets, except aerospace, were significantly lower. The sharp decline in sales and a reduction in customers steel inventories lowered steelmaking capacity utilization, which hurt profitability. In addition, the strong U.S. dollar continued to adversely impact business competitiveness in global markets. |
During the year, as a result of the companys restructuring
efforts and the economic downturn, the workforce was reduced by 1,739 positions by the end
of 2001, a reduction of 8.5%. The company completed several acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances in 2001. In the first quarter, the company entered into a joint venture with another bearing manufacturer in Brazil to produce forged and turned steel rings. The company also entered into two e-business joint ventures, one in North America and one in Europe, to provide e-business services for North American and European industrial distributors. The company purchased the assets of Score International, Inc., a manufacturer of dental handpiece repair tools, and completed the buyout of its Chinese joint venture partner in Yantai Timken Company Limited. Further, the previously announced sale of the tool and die steel operations of Timken Latrobe Steel Europe was finalized. At the end of the first quarter, Steve Perry, vice president human resources, purchasing and communications, retired from the company to accept President Bushs appointment as administrator of the General Services Administration. In the second quarter, the company announced the second phase of its restructuring, affecting virtually every Timken manufacturing site worldwide and establishing a foundation for accelerating the companys growth initiatives. The company announced its intent to close bearing plants in Columbus, Ohio and Duston, England, and to sell a tooling plant in Ashland, Ohio. The company entered into a strategic alliance with Axicon Technologies in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to develop advanced gearing products. Also, the company formed a joint venture with Bardella S.A. Industrias Mechanicas (Bardella) to provide industrial services to the steel and aluminum industries in Brazil. |
20
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
In the third quarter, the company continued to experience
the impact of prolonged economic deterioration. As a result, the company accelerated its
previously announced manufacturing strategy initiative, which included stepping up the
closing of the Columbus and Duston bearing plants and reducing salaried employment by an
additional 300 associates primarily in North America and Western Europe. In the fourth quarter, the company acquired Lecheres Industries SAS, parent company of Bamarec, S.A., a precision component manufacturer in France. In early November, the Columbus rail bearing plant was closed ahead of schedule. In response to the continued economic weakness experienced in the manufacturing sector throughout the year and projections of a slow economic recovery, the companys board of directors reduced the quarterly dividend from $0.18 to $0.13. The $31.0 million payment from the U.S. Treasury Department under CDSOA resulted from a requirement that tariffs collected on dumped imports be directed to the industries harmed. |
On December 19, the board of directors elected Glenn Eisenberg as
executive vice president finance and administration. Mr. Eisenberg succeeds Gene
Little, senior vice president finance, who will retire in mid-2002 after 35 years
of service. Mr. Eisenberg began his duties on January 10, 2002. On January 1, 2002, the members of the European Union ceased using their national currencies and began using the common currency, the Euro. During 2001, the company evaluated the business implications of this impending conversion, including the adaptation of internal systems to accommodate Euro transactions, the competitive implications of cross-border pricing and other strategic issues. As of December 31, 2001, all of the companys affected subsidiaries had been converted and the Euro conversion did not have a material impact on the companys financial condition or results of operations. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE STATEMENT OF INCOME
2001 compared to 2000
The company reported net sales of $2.447 billion, a
decrease of 7.4% from $2.643 billion in 2000. Continuing weakness in global automotive and
industrial demand and the U.S. manufacturing recession contributed to the decreased sales
and profits for 2001. The strong U.S. dollar continued to hurt business competitiveness in
global markets. The company experienced declining demand in key sectors, including North
American heavy truck and rail, as well as inventory balancing in the North American light
truck and SUV market. Globally, demand for industrial products decreased in 2001.
Aerospace and super precision sales increased modestly over 2000 levels. Sales of steel
products in all markets except aerospace were significantly lower. Gross profit in 2001 was $400.7 million (16.4% of net sales), down from $500.9 million (19.0% of net sales). The impact of the lower sales volume, fueled by weakened automotive and industrial product demand as well as reduced operating levels to control inventory, reduced profitability in 2001, compared to 2000. In 2001, gross profit included $7.7 million in reorganization and implementation costs compared to $4.1 million in 2000. In 2001, the economic downturn resulted in a reduction of 777 positions, and restructuring efforts led to 762 reductions. The operating loss for 2001 was $17.6 million, compared to income of $105.6 million in 2000. In 2001, the company recorded restructuring costs of $54.7 million and $12.6 million of implementation and reorganization costs, compared to $27.8 million in restructuring costs and $11.1 million in reorganization costs in 2000. Selling, administrative and general expenses decreased to $363.7 million (14.9% of net sales) in 2001, compared to $367.5 million (13.9% of net sales) in 2000. This decrease was primarily caused by reduced compensation expense. The salaried workforce reduction, which occurred during the second half of 2001, is expected to significantly reduce selling, administrative and general expense in 2002. The $55 million restructuring program announced in March 2000 concluded during the first quarter of 2001, with total charges of $49.4 million ($10.5 million in 2001) recorded for impairment, restructuring and reorganization. Of the $49.4 million total charges recorded between March 2000 and March 2001, $20.7 million were impairment expenses, $13.0 million related to restructuring expenses and |
$15.7 million were reorganization expenses. During the year, $2.0
million in restructuring expenses were reversed as a result of an overaccrual in severance
for associates included in the first phase of restructuring but who were not severed.
Total payments of $13.0 million have been disbursed as of December 31, 2001. Estimated
savings related to this program realized through the end of 2001 approximate $26 million
before taxes. During 2001, 106 positions were identified and exited the company due to the
initial restructuring. Combined with positions eliminated during 2000, this resulted in a
total elimination of 694 positions as part of the initial restructuring. In April 2001, the company announced a strategic global refocusing of its manufacturing operations to establish a foundation for accelerating the company's growth initiatives. This second phase of the company's transformation includes creating focused factories for each product line or component, replacing specific manufacturing processes with state-of-the-art processes through the company's global supply chain, rationalizing production to the lowest total cost plants in the company's global manufacturing system and implementing lean manufacturing process redesign to continue to improve quality and productivity. The company announced its intention to close bearing plants in Columbus, Ohio and Duston, England, and to sell a tooling plant in Ashland, Ohio. These changes were expected to affect production processes and employment as the company reduces positions by about 1,500 by the end of 2002. In light of the market weakness experienced throughout 2001, the company announced in June that it was stepping up the strategic refocusing of its manufacturing operations. This included accelerating the previously announced closings in Columbus and Duston. The Columbus bearing plant ceased manufacturing operations on November 9, while the Duston plant is expected to close in mid-2002. The company announced additional cost-saving actions in August. The company took steps to further reduce capital spending, delay or scale back certain projects and reduce salaried employment. The reductions affected about 300 salaried associates concentrated in North America and Western Europe. The affected associates exited the company by the end of 2001. |
21 |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF THE STATEMENT OF INCOME (CONTINUED)
As a result of the program announced in April, the company
targeted an annualized pretax rate of savings of approximately $100 million by the end of
2004. To implement these actions, the company expects to take approximately $100-$110
million in severance, impairment and implementation charges by the end of 2002. As of the
end of 2001, the company achieved estimated annualized savings of $21 million. The actual charges incurred for this program to date total $56.8 million. Of that amount, $15.1 million were curtailment charges, $1.5 million were related to impaired assets, $30.8 million were severance expenses, $1.4 million were exit costs and the remaining $8.0 million were implementation charges classified as cost of products sold ($4.1 million) and selling, administrative and general expenses ($3.9 million). The curtailment charges of $15.1 million were for the pension and postretirement benefits related to the shutdown of the Columbus plant. The $30.8 million of severance costs and $1.4 million in exit costs were related to the shutdown of the Columbus and Duston plants as well as reductions in the salaried workforce. As of December 31, 2001, cash payments of $9.1 million have been made for severance, resulting in a remaining accrual balance of $21.4 million. Of the total $30.8 million in severance costs, $0.3 million was paid and expensed when incurred. Since the announcement in April, 856 associates left the company by the end of 2001. Of that number, 618 people were from the Duston and Columbus plants, Canadian Timken Ltd., and associates included in the worldwide salaried workforce reduction for whom severance has been paid. The remaining 238 associates retired or voluntarily left the company through the end of the year, and their positions have been eliminated. The majority of the increase in income reflected in other income (expense) in 2001 versus 2000 came from the $31.0 million CDSOA payment as well as gain on sales of property in Canada and Germany. This income was partially offset by the increased foreign currency translation losses recorded by the company during 2001. Foreign currency translation losses related to non-hyperinflationary economies totaled $0.9 million in 2001, compared to income of $2.6 million in 2000. The increase in translation losses is related to the continued weakening of European currencies against a strong U.S. dollar and the devaluation of the Brazilian real during 2001. The companys subsidiary in Romania is considered to operate in a highly inflationary economy. In 2001, the company recorded unrealized exchange losses of $2.3 million related to the translation of Timken Romanias financial statements, compared to $4.0 million in 2000. The expense was impacted by the strength of the U.S. dollar. Although the company recorded a loss before income taxes for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001, a consolidated tax provision has been recorded as a result of the company generating income in certain jurisdictions on which taxes must be provided and losses in other jurisdictions, which are not available to reduce overall tax expense. |
The Automotive Bearings Business includes products for passenger cars,
light and heavy trucks and trailers. The decline in global automotive demand that began in
the second half of 2000 continued to negatively impact sales of automotive bearings during
2001. Global Automotive Bearings sales for 2001 fell 10.6% to $751.0 million from
$839.8 million in 2000. North American automotive bearings sales were down compared to
2000. Production levels were adversely impacted by increased import and transplant
penetration in light vehicles and vehicle inventory reduction. Light truck production was
down 8% from 2000, medium and heavy truck production was down 35% and trailer production
down 44% from 2000 levels. In Europe, automotive bearing sales decreased compared to 2000
levels. The company anticipates that key automotive markets will be weaker in 2002
compared to 2001. New platform launches are expected to improve the companys
performance in the automotive sector in 2002. Excluding $31.0 million in restructuring,
impairment and implementation charges and the favorable $3.0 million allocated portion of
the CDSOA payment, Automotive Bearings earnings before interest and income taxes
(EBIT) was a loss of $11.9 million in 2001. Excluding $3.0 million in restructuring,
impairment and implementation charges in 2000, Automotive Bearings EBIT reflected
income of $27.6 million. Including these special charges in 2001 and 2000 and the CDSOA
payment in 2001, Automotive Bearings EBIT was a loss of $39.9 million, compared to
income of $24.6 million in 2000. The decline in EBIT was caused by lower sales volume,
pricing pressures, higher electricity, natural gas and raw material costs and reduced
plant activity, resulting in higher unabsorbed manufacturing costs. In 2001, a change was
made to the corporate center cost allocation methodology to better align corporate costs,
such as research and development, with the business receiving the direct benefit.
Automotive Bearings selling, administrative and general expenses were higher than a
year ago, primarily due to the increased allocation of corporate center expenses to the
business and increased reorganization expense. The Industrial Bearings Business includes industrial, rail, aerospace and super precision products as well as emerging markets in China, India and Central and Eastern Europe. Industrial Bearings net sales were $882.3 million, a decrease of 4.5% from 2000 net sales of $923.5 million. Globally, demand for industrial products decreased in 2001. In addition, aerospace and super precision sales increased about 10% in 2001 compared to 2000, but were offset by the continued decline in rail sales. North American railcar production is at its lowest level since 1992. Rail markets are expected to remain depressed. The company anticipates that industrial markets will start to improve in the second half of 2002. The decrease in commercial aerospace sales should be mitigated by the increased military spending. Excluding $33.6 million in restructuring, impairment and implementation charges and the favorable $28.0 million allocated portion of the CDSOA payment, Industrial Bearings EBIT was $37.7 million in 2001, compared to $72.4 million in 2000, which excluded $18.1 million in restructuring, impairment and implementation charges. Including these special charges in 2001 and 2000 and the CDSOA payment in 2001, Industrial Bearings EBIT was $32.1 million in 2001, compared to $54.3 million in 2000. Lower sales volume, unfavorable product mix, higher electricity and natural gas costs and lowered production levels reduced profitability in 2001, compared to 2000. Improved EBIT |
22
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
performance in aerospace and super precision was not enough
to offset the decline in profitability experienced in the overall Industrial
Bearings segment. Industrial Bearings selling, administrative and general
expenses in 2001 were lower, compared to a year ago. Although the reserve for doubtful
accounts increased year over year as a result of a rail customers bankruptcy filing
in 2001, this increase was more than offset by the favorable impact on Industrial
Bearings expenses resulting from the change made in the corporate center cost
allocation methodology to better align corporate costs with the business receiving the
direct benefit. Steel's net sales, including intersegment sales, decreased by 10.8% to $960.4 million, compared to $1.076 billion in 2000. Weaker customer demand in the last half of 2001 led to lower sales in nearly all Steel business sectors. The exceptions were sales to aerospace and oil country customers, which increased modestly from 2000 levels. Automotive demand, which began softening in the fourth quarter of 2000 and continued throughout 2001, negatively impacted Steel sales. Sales to bearing customers decreased. Imports continued to negatively affect the Steel business by lowering market prices in the U.S. In addition, the strong U.S. dollar continued to hurt Steel business competitiveness in global markets. In June 2001, President Bush directed the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to initiate an investigation on steel imports under Section 201 of U.S. trade law, urging multilateral negotiations to reduce global excess steel capacity and calling for multilateral negotiations to address market-distorting factors in the world steel trade. Steel contributed to the investigation by completing the ITC questionnaires. In late October, the ITC voted and affirmed that injury had been caused related to hot-rolled and cold-finished bars as well as tool steels. The final remedies from the recent Section 201 filings are expected to be announced in the first quarter of 2002. Only slight improvements in demand are expected in early 2002, compared to very weak steel demand in the fourth quarter of 2001. In general, steel demand across most business sectors is expected to remain weak through the first half of 2002. Excluding Steel's portion of the restructuring, impairment and implementation charges of $2.7 million, Steel's EBIT in 2001 decreased 67.7% to $12.0 million, compared to $37.1 million in 2000, which excluded $17.8 million in special charges. Including restructuring, impairment and implementation charges, Steel EBIT was $9.3 million, compared to $19.3 million in 2000. Due to pressure from imports, Steel has had to lower prices to maintain market share in certain segments, resulting in lower margins. The decline in EBIT was primarily due to lower sales volume and reduced operating levels in response to market conditions. However, continued cost-cutting actions and lower raw material and energy costs in the last half of 2001 favorably impacted EBIT performance. The average unit cost for natural gas was higher in 2001 compared to 2000, but reduced operating levels caused natural gas consumption in 2001 to be lower than 2000. Steel's selling, administrative and general expenses in 2001 decreased, compared to a year ago. Although there were increased costs associated with the alliance with Axicon Technologies, Inc. and the recent acquisition of Lecheres Industries SAS, these increases were offset by the cost savings obtained from various cost-reduction programs implemented by the business during 2001. In addition, Steel had a favorable impact on its expenses as a result of the change made |
in 2001 in the corporate center cost allocation methodology used to
better align corporate costs with the business receiving the direct benefit. 2000 compared to 1999 |
23 |
consolidated balance sheet
December 31 | ||
2001 | 2000 | |
(Thousands of dollars) ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2001$14,976; 2000$11,259 Deferred income taxes Refundable income taxes Inventories: Manufacturing supplies Work in process and raw materials Finished products |
$ 33,392 307,759 42,895 15,103 36,658 212,040 180,533 |
$ 10,927 354,972 43,094 -0- 40,515 247,806 201,228 |
|
429,231 | 489,549 |
|
828,380 488,540 2,483,253 |
898,542 489,254 2,485,125 |
Less allowances for depreciation | 2,971,793 1,666,448 |
2,974,379 1,610,607 |
|
1,305,345 | 1,363,772 |
Other Assets Costs in excess of net assets of acquired businesses, less accumulated amortization: 2001$47,288 ; 2000$41,228 Intangible pension asset Miscellaneous receivables and other assets Deferred income taxes Deferred charges and prepaid expenses |
150,041 136,118 63,499 27,164 22,537 |
151,487 88,405 43,974 -0- 17,925 |
|
399,359 | 301,791 |
Total Assets | $ 2,533,084 | $ 2,564,105 |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE BALANCE
SHEET
Total assets decreased by $31.0 million. This decrease was
the result of the company monitoring working capital and decreasing capital expenditures.
Accounts receivable decreased by $47.2 million from December 31, 2000. The companys
consolidated number of days sales in receivables at December 31, 2001 was 51 days,
compared to 53 days as of December 31, 2000. The decreases were the result of reduced
sales levels and concentrated cash collection efforts. The decrease in inventories was $60.3 million. The companys consolidated number of days supply in inventory at December 31, 2001 was 105 days, compared to 108 days a year ago. This was the lowest level ever in the companys history. Steels inventory levels were reduced in 2001 through effective management and structural improvements. The company uses the LIFO method of accounting for approximately 73% of its inventories. Under this method, the cost of products sold approximates current costs and, as such, reduces distortion in reporting due to inflation. Depreciation charged to operations is based on historical cost and is significantly less than if it were based on replacement value. Miscellaneous receivables and other assets increased $19.5 million from December 31, 2000. This was primarily a result of the company funding affiliations and joint ventures. These include the Brazilian |
automotive joint venture with another bearing manufacturer, the
industrial repair and engineering services joint venture in Brazil with Bardella,
e-business joint ventures in the United States and Europe, the strategic alliance between
Axicon Technologies, Inc. and Precision Steel Components, and the equity investment in Pel
Technologies, LLC. The intangible pension asset increased by $47.7 million from December 31, 2000. In 2001, the company recorded additional pension liability, which is included in accrued pension cost. This additional pension liability generated a non-cash aftertax charge to accumulated other comprehensive loss of $122.5 million. Lower investment performance, which reflected lower stock market returns, and lower interest rates reduced the companys pension fund asset values and increased the companys defined benefit pension liability, respectively. The non-current deferred income tax asset increased at December 31, 2001 as a result of higher minimum pension liability and postretirement benefits. These deferred income tax assets are realizable in future years. Losses incurred in tax jurisdictions outside of the U.S. during 2001 have been fully reserved by increasing the valuation allowance for deferred income taxes. |
24
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
December 31 | ||
2001 | 2000 | |
(Thousands of dollars) LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY Current Liabilities Commercial paper Short-term debt Accounts payable and other liabilities Salaries, wages and benefits Income taxes Current portion of long-term debt |
$ 1,962 84,468 258,001 254,291 -0- 42,434 |
$ 76,930 105,519 239,182 137,320 1,527 26,974 |
|
641,156 368,151 317,297 406,568 -0- 18,177 |
587,452 305,181 237,952 394,097 11,742 22,999 |
|
1,110,193 | 971,971 |
Shareholders Equity Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value: Authorized10,000,000 shares each class, none issued Common stock without par value: Authorized200,000,000 shares Issued (including shares in treasury) 63,082,626 shares Stated capital Other paid-in capital Earnings invested in the business Accumulated other comprehensive loss Treasury shares at cost (2001 3,226,544 shares; 2000 3,117,469 shares) |
-0- 53,064 256,423 757,410 (224,538) (60,624) |
-0- 53,064 256,873 839,242 (84,913) (59,584) |
|
781,735 | 1,004,682 |
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity | $ 2,533,084 | $ 2,564,105 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 29 through 38.
Accounts payable and other liabilities increased by $18.8
million, primarily due to recording higher accruals for severance related to the
restructuring announced in April 2001. In addition, the 2001 acquisitions of Lecheres
Industries SAS and Score International, Inc. increased accounts payable and accrued taxes
year over year. The increase in salaries, wages and benefits of $117.0 million is
attributable to increased current pension and postretirement liabilities. The company continues to value the importance of a strong credit profile. Standard & Poors Rating Services (S&P) rating of the companys long-term senior debt remains A-. S&P revised its outlook on the company from stable to negative and affirmed all ratings on the companys debt. In addition, Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) downgraded the companys long-term senior debt rating from A3 to Baa1 and revised its ratings outlook from stable to negative. Moodys affirmed the companys short-term debt rating. The 38.9% debt-to-total-capital ratio was higher than the 33.9% at the end of 2000, due to the decrease in shareholders equity. Debt decreased by $17.6 million, from $514.6 million at the end of 2000 to $497.0 million at December 31, 2001. Although debt increased |
during the year to fund increases to working capital and to fund
capital expenditures related to the manufacturing strategy initiative, this increase was
more than offset by the companys focused actions during the year to lower
inventories and control other costs to generate cash and reduce debt. The proceeds
realized from the companys issuance of $75.0 million in medium-term notes in August
2001 were used to pay down outstanding commercial paper. Capital spending in 2001
decreased 37.1% to $102.3 million from total 2000 capital spending of $162.7 million, as a
result of the company effectively monitoring asset maintenance and replacement as well as
managing capital spending related to the manufacturing strategy initiative. Shareholders equity decreased primarily as a result of the minimum pension liability adjustment of $122.5 million, net loss of $41.7 million, payment of dividends to shareholders of $40.2 million for the year and non-cash foreign currency translation adjustments of $15.9 million, resulting from the fluctuation in exchange rates for various currencies due to the strong U.S. dollar. |
25 |
consolidated statement of cash flows
Year Ended December 31 | |||
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |
(Thousands of dollars) CASH PROVIDED (USED) Operating Activities Net (loss) income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Deferred income tax provision Common stock issued in lieu of cash to benefit plans Non-cash portion of impairment and restructuring charges Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
$ (41,666) 152,467 23,013 1,441 41,832 44,803 51,247 (16,897) (72,483) (3,886) |
$ 45,888 151,047 10,585 1,303 16,813 (22,536) (52,566) (172) 4,046 (1,296) |
$ 62,624 149,949 20,760 467 -0- 12,390 6,551 13,307 13,291 (1,921) |
|
179,871 (86,377) (12,957) |
153,112 (152,506) -0- |
277,418 (164,872) (29,240) |
|
(99,334) (40,166) (2,931) 80,766 (2,176) (90,980) |
(152,506) (43,562) (24,149) 3,478 (3,595) 70,865 |
(194,112) (44,502) (14,271) 4,076 (20,867) (411) |
|
(55,487) (2,585) |
3,037 (622) |
(75,975) 255 |
|
22,465 10,927 |
3,021 7,906 |
7,586 320 |
|
$ 33,392 | $ 10,927 | $ 7,906 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 29 through 38.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
2001 compared to 2000
Cash and cash equivalents increased $22.5 million in 2001. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2001 was $179.9 million, compared to $153.1 million in 2000. Excluding the impact of the $31.0 million CDSOA payment, net cash provided by operating activities would have been comparable to 2000. Cash generated from income in 2001 was used to fund working capital changes, the restructuring and capital expenditures and to pay down debt. Accounts receivable provided $44.8 million in cash. The decrease in inventories provided $51.2 million in cash during 2001. Cash was used as a result of the $72.5 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses. Although accounts payable and accrued expenses increased in 2001, the cash flow effect of this increase in accruals was offset by the non-cash impact of the severance accruals and postretirement benefit reserves related to the Duston and Columbus plant closings as well as the salaried workforce reduction and other manufacturing strategy initiatives. The costs associated with the closing of the Columbus | and Duston plants and other manufacturing strategy
initiatives were included in the restructuring announced in April 2001. The costs
associated with the salaried workforce reduction were included in the accelerated
restructuring announced in August 2001. Purchases of property, plant and equipmentnet were $86.4 million compared to $152.5 million in 2000. In light of the weak economy, the company focused attention on cash conservation and controlled capital spending, while taking into account acceleration of the manufacturing strategy initiatives. The company generated more than $100 million in free cash flow. Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, less purchases of property, plant and equipment-net, adjusted for tax payments versus tax provided. Although the company implemented manufacturing strategy initiatives, cash was used to fund focused growth initiatives such as acquiring Score International, Inc., completing the buyout of its 40% minority interest Chinese joint venture partner in Yantai Timken Company Limited and purchasing Lecheres Industries SAS. |
26
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
In August 2001, the company issued $75.0 million in medium-term notes, and the proceeds were used to pay down outstanding commercial paper. Funds were used by the company to repurchase 206,300 shares of the companys common stock to be held in treasury as authorized under the companys 2000 stock purchase plan. The 2000 common stock purchase plan authorizes the company to buy in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions up to 4 million shares of common stock, which are to be held as treasury shares and used for specified purposes. The company may exercise this | authorization until December 31, 2006. As of December 31,
2001, approximately 3.8 million shares remain outstanding pursuant to the plan. The
company does not plan to be active in the near future in repurchasing shares under this
plan. The company expects that any cash requirements in excess of cash generated from operating activities (such as those which may be required for potential future acquisitions and affiliations as well as cash contributions to the companys pension plans) could be met by short-term borrowing and issuance of medium-term notes. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OTHER
INFORMATION
In the second quarter of 2000, the ITC voted to revoke the
industrys antidumping orders on imports of tapered roller bearings from Japan,
Romania and Hungary. The ITC determined that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
tapered roller bearings from those countries was not likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable
time. The ITC upheld the antidumping duty order against China. The company has filed an
appeal of the ITCs decision regarding Japan, which is still pending. In 2001, the company decreased the discount rate for U.S.-based pension and postretirement benefit plans from 8.0% to 7.5% to reflect the decrease in year-end interest rates. The combined expense for U.S.-based pension and postretirement benefits plans is expected to decrease by about $10 million in 2002. This decrease primarily reflects curtailment charges taken in 2001 for the Columbus plant closure that will not recur in 2002. Contributions are projected to increase from 2001 levels. Changes in short-term interest rates related to three separate funding sources impact the companys earnings. These sources are commercial paper issued in the United States, floating rate tax-exempt U.S. municipal bonds with a weekly reset mode and short-term bank borrowings at international subsidiaries. If the market rates for short-term borrowings increased by 1% around the globe, the impact would be an increase in interest expense of $1.2 million with the corresponding decrease in income before taxes of the same amount. The amount was determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the companys borrowing cost, year-end debt balances by category and an estimated impact on the tax-exempt municipal bonds interest rates. Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies, predominately in European countries, also impact the companys earnings. The greatest risk relates to products shipped between the companys European operations and the United States. Foreign currency forward contracts and options are used to hedge these intracompany transactions. Additionally, hedges are used to cover third-party purchases of product and equipment. As of December 31, 2001, there were $19.5 million of hedges in place. A uniform 10% weakening of the dollar against all currencies would have resulted in a change of $1.5 million on these hedges. In addition to the direct impact of the hedged amounts, changes in exchange rates also affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors products become more or less attractive. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, "Business Combinations," and No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and certain other intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment. Intangible assets that are separable and have a definite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. If, based on the impairment reviews, the related assets are found to be impaired, their carrying value is adjusted through a charge to earnings. The |
company will apply the new accounting rules for goodwill and other
intangible assets, beginning in the first quarter of 2002. The company is currently
evaluating the application of this complex accounting standard. It has identified five
reporting units and is in the process of estimating the fair value of each reporting unit.
On December 31, 1998, certain countries that are members of the European Union fixed the conversion rates between their national currencies and a common currency, the Euro. The participating countries' former national currencies existed until January 1, 2002. During 2001, the company evaluated the business implications of conversion to the Euro, including the need to adapt internal systems to accommodate the various Euro-denominated transactions, the competitive implications of cross-border pricing and other strategic issues. The company established a Euro project team to manage the changes required to conduct business operations in compliance with Euro-related regulations. As of December 31, 2001, all of the companys affected subsidiaries were converted, and the Euro conversion did not have a material impact on the companys financial condition or results of operations for subsidiaries. The company continues to protect the environment and comply with environmental protection laws. Additionally, it has invested in pollution control equipment and updated plant operational practices. The company is committed to implementing a documented environmental management system worldwide and to becoming certified under the ISO 14001 standard to meet or exceed customer requirements. By the end of 2001, the companys plants in Desford, England; Sosnowiec, Poland; Jamshedpur, India; and Lincolnton, North Carolina had obtained ISO 14001 certification. The company believes it has established adequate reserves to cover its environmental expenses and has a well-established environmental compliance audit program, which includes a proactive approach to bringing its domestic and international units to higher standards of environmental performance. This program measures performance against local laws as well as standards that have been established for all units worldwide. It is difficult to assess the possible effect of compliance with future requirements that differ from existing ones. As previously reported, the company is unsure of the future financial impact to the company that could result from the United States Environmental Protection Agencys (EPAs) final rules to tighten the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate and ozone. The company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries have been designated as potentially responsible parties (PRPs) by the United States EPA for site investigation and remediation at certain sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund). The claims for remediation have been asserted against numerous other entities, which are believed to be financially solvent and are expected to fulfill their proportionate share of the obligation. Management believes any ultimate liability with respect to all pending actions will not materially affect the companys operations, cash flows or consolidated financial position. |
27 |
consolidated statement of shareholders equity
Common Stock | ||||||
Total | Stated Capital |
Other Paid-In Capital |
Earnings Invested in the Business |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Treasury Stock |
|
(Thousands of dollars) Year Ended December 31, 1999 Balance at January 1, 1999 Net income Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of income tax of $2,829) Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of income tax of $274) Total comprehensive income Dividends$0.72 per share Purchase of 804,500 shares for treasury Issuance of 152,425 shares from treasury(1) |
$ 1,056,081 62,624 (13,952) (466) 48,206 (44,502) (14,271) 467 |
$ 53,064 |
$ 261,156 (2,869) |
$ 818,794 62,624 (44,502) |
$ (49,716) (13,952) (466) |
$ (27,217) (14,271) 3,336 |
Balance at December 31, 1999 | $ 1,045,981 | $ 53,064 | $ 258,287 | $ 836,916 | $ (64,134) | $ (38,152) |
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Net income Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of income tax of $1,137) Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of income tax of $301) Total comprehensive income Dividends$0.72 per share Purchase of 1,354,000 shares for treasury Issuance of 123,068 shares from treasury(1) |
45,888 (21,293) 514 25,109 (43,562) (24,149) 1,303 |
(1,414) | 45,888 (43,562) |
(21,293) 514 |
(24,149) 2,717 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2000 | $ 1,004,682 | $ 53,064 | $ 256,873 | $ 839,242 | $ (84,913) | $ (59,584) |
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Net loss Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of income tax of $963) Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of income tax of $61,892) Cumulative effect of change in method of accounting Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments Reclassification adjustments contract settlements Total comprehensive loss Dividends$0.67 per share Purchase of 206,300 shares for treasury Issuance of 97,225 shares from treasury(1) |
(41,666) (15,914) (122,520) (34) (1,560) 403 (139,625) (40,166) (2,931) 1,441 |
(450) | (41,666) (40,166) |
(15,914) (122,520) (34) (1,560) 403 |
(2,931) 1,891 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2001 | $ 781,735 | $ 53,064 | $ 256,423 | $ 757,410 | $ (224,538) | $ (60,624) |
(1) Share activity was in conjunction with employee benefit and stock option plans. See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 29 through 38.
28
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
notes to consolidated financial statements
1 SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts and operations of the company and its
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated upon
consolidation. Revenue Recognition: The company recognizes revenue when title passes to the customer. This is generally FOB shipping point except for certain exported goods, which is FOB destination. Selling prices are fixed based on purchase orders or contractual arrangements. Write-offs of accounts receivable have historically been low. Cash Equivalents: The company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Inventories: Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with 73% valued by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. If all inventories had been valued at current costs, inventories would have been $151,976,000 and $140,473,000 greater at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment is valued at cost less accumulated depreciation. Provision for depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the assets. The useful lives are approximately 30 years for buildings, 5 to 7 years for computer software and 3 to 20 years for machinery and equipment. Costs in Excess of Net Assets of Acquired Businesses: Costs in excess of net assets of acquired businesses (goodwill) are amortized on the straight-line method over 25 years for businesses acquired after 1991 and over 40 years for those acquired before 1991. The carrying value of goodwill is reviewed for recoverability based on the undiscounted cash flows of the businesses acquired over the remaining amortization period. Should the review indicate that goodwill is not recoverable, the companys carrying value of the goodwill would be reduced to fair value. In addition, the company assesses long-lived assets for impairment under Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." Under those rules, goodwill associated with assets acquired in a purchase business combination is included in impairment evaluations when events or circumstances exist that indicate the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and certain other intangible assets are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment. Intangible assets that are separable and have a definite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. If, based on the impairment reviews, the related assets are found to be impaired, their carrying value is adjusted through a charge to earnings. The company will apply the new accounting rules for goodwill and other intangible assets, beginning in the first quarter of 2002. The company is currently evaluating the implications of SFAS No. 142. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which provides guidance on the accounting for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144 also provides guidance for differentiating between assets held and used and assets to be disposed of. The company will apply the new accounting rules for impairment, beginning January 1, 2002, and is evaluating the impact of adoption. |
Income Taxes: Deferred income taxes are provided for the
temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the
companys assets and liabilities. The company plans to reinvest undistributed earnings of all non-U.S. subsidiaries. The amount of undistributed earnings that is considered to be indefinitely reinvested for this purpose was approximately $115,800,000 at December 31, 2001. Accordingly, U.S. income taxes have not been provided on such earnings. Based on financial information as of December 31, 2001, no additional U.S. income tax may be due if these earnings were distributed. However, such distributions would be subject to non-U.S. withholding taxes and secondary taxes on distributed profits totaling approximately $6,100,000. Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed and updated regularly to reflect recent experience. Foreign Currency Translation: Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, other than those located in highly inflationary countries, are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. The related translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from transactions and the translation of financial statements of subsidiaries in highly inflationary countries are included in results of operations. The company recorded foreign currency exchange losses of $3,211,000 in 2001, $1,467,000 in 2000 and $9,856,000 in 1999. Earnings Per Share: Earnings per share are computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Earnings per share - assuming dilution are computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding adjusted for the dilutive impact of potential common shares for options. Derivative Instruments: Effective January 1, 2001, the company adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended. The statement required the company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of a derivative that is designated as a hedge is immediately recognized in earnings. Certain of the companys holdings of forward foreign exchange contracts have been deemed derivatives pursuant to the criteria established in SFAS No. 133, of which the company has designated certain of those derivatives as hedges. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 did not have a significant effect on the companys financial position or results of operations. Reclassifications: Certain amounts reported in the 2000 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2001 presentation. |
29 |
notes to consolidated financial statements
2 IMPAIRMENT AND RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
It is the companys policy to recognize restructuring
costs in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, "Liability
Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity
(including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)" and the SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 100, "Restructuring and Impairment Charges." Impairment charges are
recognized to write down assets to their fair value when assets are identified that have a
history of negative operating results or cash flows, have limited or no future strategic
use or when it is probable that the undiscounted cash flows of an asset are less than the
current net book value. The $55 million restructuring program announced in March 2000 concluded during the first quarter of 2001, with total charges of $49.4 million ($10.5 million in 2001) recorded for impairment, restructuring and reorganization. Of the $49.4 million total charges recorded between March 2000 and March 2001, $20.7 million were impairment expenses, $13.0 million related to restructuring expenses and $15.7 million were reorganization expenses. During the year, $2.0 million in restructuring expenses were reversed as a result of an overaccrual in severance for associates included in the first phase of restructuring but who were not severed. Total payments of $13.0 million have been disbursed as of December 31, 2001. Estimated savings related to this program realized through the end of 2001 approximate $26 million before taxes. During 2001, 106 positions were identified and exited the company due to the initial restructuring. Combined with positions eliminated during 2000, this resulted in a total elimination of 694 positions as part of the initial restructuring. In April 2001, the company announced a strategic global refocusing of its manufacturing operations to establish a foundation for accelerating the company's growth initiatives. This second phase of the company's transformation includes creating focused factories for each product line or component, replacing specific manufacturing processes with state-of-the-art processes through the company's global supply chain, rationalizing production to the lowest total cost plants in the company's global manufacturing system and implementing lean manufacturing process redesign to continue to improve quality and productivity. The company announced its intention to close bearing plants in Columbus, Ohio, and Duston, England, and to sell a tooling plant in Ashland, Ohio. These changes were expected to affect production processes and employment as the company reduces positions by about 1,500 by the end of 2002. |
In light of the market weakness experienced throughout 2001, the
company announced in June that it was stepping up the strategic refocusing of its
manufacturing operations. This included accelerating the previously announced closings in
Columbus and Duston. The Columbus bearing plant ceased manufacturing operations on
November 9, while the Duston plant is expected to close in mid-2002. The company announced
additional cost-saving actions in August. The company took steps to further reduce capital
spending, delay or scale back certain projects and reduce salaried employment. The
reductions affected about 300 salaried associates concentrated in North America and
Western Europe. The affected associates exited the company by the end of 2001. As a result of the program announced in April, the company targeted an annualized pretax rate of savings of approximately $100 million by the end of 2004. To implement these actions, the company expects to take approximately $100-$110 million in severance, impairment and implementation charges by the end of 2002. As of the end of 2001, the company achieved estimated annualized savings of $21 million. The actual charges incurred for this program to date total $56.8 million. Of that amount, $15.1 million were curtailment charges, $1.5 million related to impaired assets, $30.8 million were severance expenses, $1.4 million were exit costs and the remaining $8.0 million were implementation charges classified as cost of products sold ($4.1 million) and selling, administrative, and general expenses ($3.9 million). The curtailment charges of $15.1 million were for the pension and postretirement benefits related to the shutdown of the Columbus plant. The $30.8 million of severance costs and $1.4 million in exit costs were related to the shutdown of the Columbus and Duston plants as well as reductions in the salaried workforce. As of December 31, 2001, cash payments of $9.1 million have been made for severance, resulting in a remaining accrual balance of $21.4 million, the majority of which is payable over the next twelve months. Of the total $30.8 million in severance costs, $0.3 million was paid and expensed when incurred. Since the announcement in April, 856 associates left the company by the end of 2001. Of that number, 618 people were from the Duston and Columbus plants, Canadian Timken Ltd., and associates included in the worldwide salaried workforce reduction for whom severance has been paid. The remaining 238 associates retired or voluntarily left the company through the end of the year, and their positions have been eliminated. |
Key elements of the 2001 restructuring and impairment charges by segment for the year ended December 31, 2001 are as follows:
Auto | Industrial | Steel | Total | |
(Millions of dollars) Restructuring: Separation cost Exit costs Impaired assets: Property, plant and equipment Special Charges: SFAS No. 88/106 curtailment Reversal of Separation cost |
$ 26.0 0.4 $ 26.4 $ 1.1 $ -0- $ (0.2) $ 27.3 |
$ 7.6 1.0 $ 8.6 $ 3.8 $ 15.1 $ (1.8) $ 25.7 |
$ 1.3 -0- $ 1.3 $ 0.4 $ -0- $ -0- $ 1.7 |
$ 34.9 1.4 $ 36.3 $ 5.3 $ 15.1 $ (2.0) $ 54.7 |
30
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
3 COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the following:
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |
(Thousands of dollars) Foreign currency translation adjustment Minimum pension liability adjustment Fair value of open foreign currency cash flow hedges |
$ (94,570) (128,777) (1,191) |
$ (78,656) (6,257) -0- |
$ (57,363) (6,771) -0- |
$ (224,538) | $ (84,913) | $ (64,134) |
4 ACQUISITIONS
In November 2001, the company purchased Lecheres Industries
SAS, the parent company of Bamarec S.A., a precision component manufacturer based in
France. In February 2001, the company completed the buyout of its Chinese joint venture
partner in Yantai Timken Company Limited. Prior to the buyout, the company owned a 60%
interest in Yantai Timken, and its financial results were consolidated into the
companys financial statements, taking into account a minority interest. In January
2001, the company purchased the assets of Score International, Inc., a manufacturer of
dental handpiece repair tools located in Sanford, Florida. In March 1999, the company increased its ownership of Timken India Limited (formerly Tata Timken Limited) from 40% to 80%. Prior to the additional investment, the company accounted for its investment in Timken India using the equity method. As a result of the transaction, the Timken India financial position and |
operating results are consolidated into the companys financial
statements. The total cost of these acquisitions amounted to $12,957,000 in 2001 and $29,240,000 in 1999. A portion of the purchase price has been allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired based on their fair values at the dates of acquisition. The fair value of the assets was $25,408,000 in 2001 and $30,425,000 in 1999; the fair value of liabilities assumed was $16,396,000 in 2001 and $9,790,000 in 1999. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been allocated to goodwill. All of the acquisitions were accounted for as purchases. The companys consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the acquired businesses for the period subsequent to the effective date of these acquisitions. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of these acquisitions was not significant. |
5 EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of earnings per share and earnings per share - assuming dilution for the years ended December 31:
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |
(Thousands of dollars, except per share data) Numerator: Net (loss) income for earnings per share and earnings per share - assuming dilution income available to common shareholders Denominator: Denominator for earnings per share weighted-average shares Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options and awards based on the treasury stock method |
$ (41,666) 59,947,568 (1) |
$ 45,888 60,556,595 166,577 |
$ 62,624 61,795,162 230,651 |
Denominator for earnings per share - assuming
dilution adjusted weighted-average shares |
59,947,568 |
60,723,172 | 62,025,813 |
Earnings per share | $ (0.69) | $ 0.76 | $ 1.01 |
Earnings per share - assuming dilution | $ (0.69) | $ 0.76 | $ 1.01 |
(1) Addition of 161,211 shares would result in antidilution.
31 |
notes to consolidated financial statements
6 FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Long-term debt at December 31, 2001 and 2000 was as follows:
2001 | 2000 | |
(Thousands of dollars) Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, due at various dates through May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.20% to 7.76% Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality and Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (1.6% at December 31, 2001) Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on July 1, 2003 (1.7% at December 31, 2001) Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing May 1, 2007 (1.6% at December 31, 2001) Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Authority Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, maturing on July 1, 2032 (1.8% at December 31, 2001) Other |
$ 327,000 21,700 17,000 8,000 24,000 12,885 |
$ 252,000 21,700 17,000 8,000 24,000 9,455 |
Less current maturities |
410,585 42,434 |
332,155 26,974 |
$ 368,151 | $ 305,181 |
The maturities of long-term debt for the five years
subsequent to December 31, 2001, are as follows: 2002$42,434,000;
2003$20,725,000; 2004$5,750,000; 2005$515,000; and
2006$95,136,000. Interest paid in 2001, 2000 and 1999 approximated $33,000,000, $33,000,000 and $32,000,000, respectively. This differs from interest expense due to timing of payments and interest capitalized of $1,400,000 in 2001; $1,600,000 in 2000; and $3,700,000 in 1999 as a part of major capital additions. The weighted-average interest rate on commercial paper borrowings during the year was 4.3% in 2001, 6.5% in 2000 and 5.2% in 1999. The weighted- average interest rate on short-term debt during the year was 5.8% in 2001, and 6.3% in 2000 and 1999. At December 31, 2001, the company had available $298,000,000 through an unsecured $300,000,000 revolving credit agreement with a group of banks. |
The agreement, which expires in June 2003, bears interest based upon
any one of four rates at the companys optionadjusted prime, Eurodollar,
competitive bid Eurodollar or the competitive bid absolute rate. Also, the company has a
shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission which, as of December
31, 2001, enables the company to issue up to an additional $125,000,000 of long-term debt
securities in the public markets. In August 2001, the company issued $75,000,000 of
medium-term notes with an effective interest rate of 6.75% maturing on August 21, 2006. The company and its subsidiaries lease a variety of real property and equipment. Rent expense under operating leases amounted to $16,799,000, $14,719,000 and $17,724,000 in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. At December 31, 2001, future minimum lease payments for noncancelable operating leases totaled $57,104,000 and are payable as follows: 2002$13,290,000; 2003$9,826,000; 2004$7,232,000 ; 2005$4,817,000; 2006$3,044,000; and $18,895,000 thereafter. |
7 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As a result of the companys worldwide operating activities, it is exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which affect its results of operations and financial condition. The company and certain subsidiaries enter into forward exchange contracts to manage exposure to currency rate fluctuations, primarily related to the purchases of inventory and equipment. The purpose of these foreign currency hedging activities is to minimize the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on business decisions and the resulting uncertainty on future financial results. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the company had forward foreign exchange contracts, all having maturities of less than one year, with notional amounts of $19,507,000 and $10,948,000, respectively. The forward foreign exchange contracts were primarily entered into by the companys European subsidiaries to manage Euro, U.S. dollar and British pound exposures. The | realized and unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are
deferred and included in inventory or property, plant and equipment, depending on the
transaction. These deferred gains and losses are reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss and recognized in earnings when the future transactions occur, or
through depreciation expense. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, commercial paper, short-term borrowings and accounts payable are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of the company's fixed-rate debt, based on discounted cash flow analysis, was $334,000,000 and $255,000,000 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The carrying value of this debt was $346,000,000 and $270,000,000. |
32
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
8 STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
The company has elected to follow Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and
related interpretations in accounting for its stock options to key associates and
directors. Under APB Opinion No. 25, because the exercise price of the companys
stock options equals the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant,
no compensation expense is recognized. Under the companys stock option plans, shares of common stock have been made available to grant at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to officers and key associates in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares and deferred shares. |
In addition, shares can be awarded to directors not employed by the company. The options have a ten-year term and vest in 25% increments annually beginning twelve months after the date of grant. Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if the company had accounted for its associate stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options granted under the plan is amortized to expense over the options vesting periods. The pro forma information indicates a decrease in net income of $5,731,000 in 2001; $6,014,000 in 2000; and $5,056,000 in 1999. |
Following is the pro forma information and the related assumptions under the Black-Scholes method:
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |
(Thousands of dollars except per share data) Pro forma net (loss) income Earnings per share Earnings per share - assuming dilution Assumptions: Risk-free interest rate Dividend yield Expected stock volatility Expected life - years |
$ (47,397) $ (0.79) $ (0.79) 6.32% 3.36% 0.480 8 |
$ 39,874 $ 0.66 $ 0.66 6.31% 3.01% 0.481 8 |
$ 57,568 $ 0.93 $ 0.93 5.33% 2.79% 0.444 8 |
A summary of activity related to stock options for the above plans is as follows for the years ended December 31:
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||
Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding - beginning of year Granted Exercised Canceled or expired |
5,720,990 1,367,400 (54,528) (208,450) |
$21.41 15.05 14.67 20.35 |
4,515,676 1,356,400 (88,761) (62,325) |
$22.90 15.88 12.96 21.28 |
3,526,301 1,186,100 (186,774) (9,951) |
$23.73 19.45 16.72 22.13 |
Outstanding - end of year | 6,825,412 | $20.22 | 5,720,990 | $21.41 | 4,515,676 | $22.90 |
Options exercisable | 3,745,131 | 2,910,271 | 2,171,996 |
The company sponsors a performance target option plan that
is contingent upon the companys common shares reaching specified fair market values.
Under the plan, no awards were issued nor was compensation expense recognized during 2001,
2000 or 1999. Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2001, range from $13.50 to $33.75; the weighted-average remaining contractual life of these options is seven years. The estimated weighted-average fair values of stock options granted during 2001, |
2000 and 1999 were $6.36, $7.01 and $8.11, respectively. At December
31, 2001, a total of 149,367 restricted stock rights, restricted shares or deferred shares
have been awarded under the above plans and are not vested. The company distributed
61,301, 100,832 and 87,206 common shares in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, as a result
of awards of restricted stock rights, restricted shares and deferred shares. The number of shares available for future grants for all plans at December 31, 2001, including stock options, is 825,513. |
33 |
notes to consolidated financial statements
9 RETIREMENT AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The company sponsors defined contribution retirement and savings plans covering substantially all associates in the United States and certain salaried associates at non-U.S. locations. The company contributes Timken Company common stock to certain plans based on formulas established in the respective plan agreements. At December 31, 2001, the plans had 12,747,708 shares of Timken Company common stock with a fair value of $206,258,000. Company contributions to the plans, including performance sharing, amounted to $13,289,000 in 2001; $14,384,000 in 2000; and $14,891,000 in 1999. The company paid dividends totaling $8,192,000 in 2001; $7,958,000 in 2000; and $6,838,000 in 1999, to plans holding common shares. | The company and its subsidiaries sponsor several unfunded
postretirement plans that provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible
retirees and dependents. Depending on retirement date and associate classification,
certain health care plans contain contributions and cost-sharing features such as
deductibles and coinsurance. The remaining health care plans and the life insurance plans
are noncontributory. The company and its subsidiaries sponsor a number of defined benefit pension plans, which cover many of their associates except those at certain locations who are covered by government plans. |
The following tables set forth the change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet of the defined benefit pension and postretirement benefits as of December 31, 2001 and 2000:
Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Postretirement Plans | |||
2001 | 2000 | 2001 | 2000 | |
(Thousands of dollars) Change in benefit obligation Benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Amendments Actuarial losses (gains) Associate contributions International plan exchange rate change Curtailment loss Benefits paid |
$ 1,641,959 35,313 126,809 6,246 120,256 1,604 (5,416) 16,522 (117,691) |
$ 1,451,729 33,328 119,943 76,602 72,869 1,845 (14,890) -0- (99,467) |
$ 588,824 4,047 48,380 (33,413) 69,500 -0- (126) 9,109 (45,620) |
$ 466,307 4,309 40,043 8,563 105,987 -0- 74 -0- (36,459) |
Benefit obligation at end of year | $ 1,825,602 | $ 1,641,959 | $ 640,701 | $ 588,824 |
Change in plan assets(1) Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Associate contributions Company contributions International plan exchange rate change Benefits paid |
$ 1,383,683 (51,608) 1,604 84,882 (5,656) (117,691) |
$ 1,457,453 (17,703) 1,845 56,843 (15,288) (99,467) |
||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ 1,295,214 | $ 1,383,683 | ||
Funded status Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss Unrecognized net asset at transition dates, net of amortization Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit) |
$ (530,388) 260,126 (2,246) 146,448 |
$ (258,276) (55,482) (4,219) 168,181 |
$ (640,701) 241,018 -0- (51,743) |
$ (588,824) 181,173 -0- (23,077) |
Accrued benefit cost | $ (126,060) | $ (149,796) | $ (451,426) | $ (430,728) |
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet Accrued benefit liability Intangible asset Minimum pension liability included in accumulated other comprehensive income |
$ (456,517) 136,118 194,339 |
$ (248,126) 88,405 9,925 |
$ (451,426) -0- -0- |
$ (430,728) -0- -0- |
Net amount recognized | $ (126,060) | $ (149,796) | $ (451,426) | $ (430,728) |
(1) Plan assets are primarily invested in listed stocks and bonds and cash equivalents.
34
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
Due to lower interest rates and lower capital market performance, the benefit obligations at December 31, 2001 exceeded the market value of plan assets for the majority of the companys plans. For these plans, the projected benefit obligation was $1,808,138,000; the accumulated benefit obligation was $1,739,851,000, and the fair value of plan assets was $1,281,626,000 at December 31, 2001. | In 2001, lower investment performance, which reflected lower stock market returns, and lower interest rates reduced the companys pension fund asset values and increased the companys defined benefit pension liability. As a result, the companys minimum pension liability increased to $330,457,000 and its related intangible pension asset increased to $136,118,000. The balance is reflected as a reduction to shareholders equity, net of applicable deferred income taxes. |
The following table summarizes the assumptions used by the consulting actuary and the related benefit cost information:
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits | |||||
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |
Assumptions Discount rate Future compensation assumption Expected long-term return on plan assets |
7.50% 3% to 4% 9.50% |
8.00% 3% to 4% 9.50% |
8.25% 3% to 4% 9.25% |
7.50% |
8.00% |
8.25% |
Components of net periodic benefit cost (Thousands of dollars) Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of prior service cost Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss Curtailment loss Amortization of transition asset |
$ 35,313 126,809 (126,882) 19,919 (292) 6,333 (982) |
$ 33,328 119,943 (116,302) 21,995 (556) -0- (1,002) |
$ 35,876 103,232 (102,148) 16,412 1,724 -0- (1,951) |
$ 4,047 48,380 -0- (4,376) 9,646 8,738 -0- |
$ 4,309 40,043 -0- (3,730) 3,670 -0- -0- |
$ 4,857 33,525 -0- (4,474) 3,796 -0- -0- |
Net periodic benefit cost | $ 60,218 | $ 57,396 | $ 53,145 | $ 66,435 | $ 44,292 | $ 37,704 |
For measurement purposes, the company assumed a weighted-average annual rate of increase in the per capita cost (health care cost trend rate) for medical benefits of 9.00% for 2001 through 2002 declining gradually to 6.00% in 2006 and thereafter for pre-age 65 benefits, 6.00% for post-age 65 benefits for all years, and 15.00% for 2001 through 2002, declining gradually to 6.00% in 2014 and thereafter for prescription drug benefits. | The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one percentage point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate would increase the 2001 total service and interest cost components by $2,087,000 and would increase the postretirement benefit obligation by $28,075,000. A one percentage point decrease would provide corresponding reductions of $1,883,000 and $25,362,000, respectively. |
10 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Expenditures committed to research and development amounted to approximately $54,000,000 in 2001; $52,000,000 in 2000; and | $50,000,000 in 1999. Such expenditures may fluctuate from year to year depending on special projects and needs. |
11 CONTINGENCIES
The company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries have been designated as potentially responsible parties (PRPs) by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for site investigation and remediation under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) with respect to certain sites. The claims for remediation have been asserted against numerous other entities which are believed to be financially solvent and are expected to fulfill their proportionate share of the obligation. In addition, the company is subject to various lawsuits, claims and proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of its business. The company accrues costs associated with environmental and legal matters when they become probable and reasonably estimable. | Environmental costs include compensation and related benefit costs
associated with associates expected to devote significant amounts of time to the
remediation effort and post-monitoring costs. Accruals are established based on the
estimated undiscounted cash flows to settle the obligations and are not reduced by any
potential recoveries from insurance or other indemnification claims. Management believes
that any ultimate liability with respect to these actions, in excess of amounts provided,
will not materially affect the companys operations, cash flows or consolidated
financial position. The company is the guarantor of a $12.3 million letter of credit for Pel Technologies, LLC. |
35 |
notes to consolidated financial statements
12 SEGMENT INFORMATION
Description of types of products and services from which
each reportable segment derives its revenues In previous years, the company had two reportable segments consisting of Bearings and Steel. Based on the companys reorganization into global business units, management has determined that the Automotive Bearings and Industrial Bearings segments meet the quantitative and qualitative thresholds of a reportable segment as defined by SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." Automotive Bearings include products for passenger cars, light and heavy trucks and trailers. Industrial Bearings include industrial, rail, aerospace and super precision products as well as emerging markets in China, India and Central and Eastern Europe. The companys tapered roller bearings are used in a wide variety of products including railroad cars and locomotives, aircraft wheels, machine tools, rolling mills and farm and construction equipment. Super precision bearings are used in aircraft, missile guidance systems, computer peripherals and medical instruments. Other bearing products manufactured by the company include cylindrical, spherical, straight and ball bearings for industrial markets. Steel products include steels of intermediate alloy, vacuum processed alloys, tool steel and some carbon grades. These are available in a wide range of solid and tubular sections with a variety of finishes. The company also manufactures custom-made steel products, including precision steel components. A significant portion of the companys steel is consumed in its bearing operations. In addition, sales are made to other anti-friction bearing companies and to aircraft, automotive, forging, tooling, oil and gas drilling industries and steel service centers. Tool steels are sold through the companys distribution facilities. |
Prior year data has been restated to comply with current year
presentation. In 2000, the company implemented a transformation of its structure, which
allowed it to work more closely with customers who are more global in scope and introduce
new products faster and increase market presence. As this implementation began in 2000, it
is impracticable for the company to restate 1999 segment financial information into
Automotive Bearings and Industrial Bearings as this structure was not in place at that
time. Measurement of segment profit or loss and segment assets Factors used by management to identify the enterprises
reportable segments Geographical entities as defined here are not reflective of how the Automotive Bearings, Industrial Bearings and Steel businesses are operated by the company. Europe information presented reflects shipments from European locations. The information does not include product manufactured by facilities located outside Europe and shipped directly to customers located in Europe. |
Geographic Financial Information | United States(3)(4) | Europe(1)(2) | Other Countries | Consolidated |
(Thousands of dollars) 2001 Net sales Impairment and restructuring Income (loss) before income taxes Non-current assets |
$ 1,906,823 24,104 24,365(3) 1,402,780 |
$ 351,242 30,054 (62,418)(1) 232,105 |
$ 189,113 531 11,170 69,819 |
$ 2,447,178 54,689 (26,883) 1,704,704 |
2000 Net sales Impairment and restructuring Income (loss) before income taxes Non-current assets |
$ 2,062,306 18,073 84,988(4) 1,391,080 |
$ 361,649 6,645 (35,065)(2) 204,135 |
$ 219,053 3,036 20,674 70,348 |
$ 2,643,008 27,754 70,597 1,665,563 |
1999 Net sales Impairment and restructuring Income (loss) before income taxes Non-current assets |
$ 1,922,092 -0- 112,556 1,303,980 |
$ 364,380 -0- (28,936) 240,020 |
$ 208,562 -0- 15,371 63,792 |
$ 2,495,034 -0- 98,991 1,607,792 |
(1) Excluding $30,054,000 of impairment and restructuring costs and reorganization
costs of $4,704,000, Europes loss before income taxes equals $27,660,000 in 2001.
(2) Excluding $6,645,000 of impairment and restructuring costs and reorganization costs of
$3,444,000, Europes loss before income taxes equals $24,976,000 in 2000.
(3) Excluding $24,104,000 of impairment and restructuring costs and reorganization costs
of $7,718,000, United States income before income taxes equals $56,187,000 in 2001.
(4) Excluding $18,073,000 of impairment and restructuring costs and reorganization costs
of $7,757,000, United States income before income taxes equals $110,818,000 in 2000.
36
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
Segment Financial Information | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 |
(Thousands of dollars) Automotive Bearings Net sales to external customers Depreciation and amortization Impairment and restructuring charges Receipt of U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) payment arnings before interest and taxes Capital expenditures |
$ 751,029 36,381 27,270 2,989 (39,939) 36,427 |
$ 839,838 35,344 1,143 -0- 24,595 50,540 |
(5) |
(Thousands of dollars) Industrial Bearings Net sales to external customers Depreciation and amortization Impairment and restructuring charges Receipt of CDSOA payment Earnings before interest and taxes Capital expenditures |
$ 882,279 48,314 25,671 28,030 32,144 34,646 |
$ 923,477 48,197 11,499 -0- 54,304 59,382 |
(5) |
(Thousands of dollars) Total Bearings Net sales to external customers Depreciation and amortization Impairment and restructuring charges Receipt of CDSOA payment (Loss) earnings before interest and taxes Capital expenditures Assets employed at year-end |
$ 1,633,308 84,695 52,941 31,019 (7,795) 71,073 1,628,160 |
$ 1,763,315 83,541 12,642 -0- 78,899 109,922 1,577,307 |
$ 1,759,871 83,255 -0- -0- 80,548 116,569 1,476,545 |
Steel Net sales to external customers Intersegment sales Depreciation and amortization Impairment and restructuring charges Earnings before interest and taxes Capital expenditures Assets employed at year-end |
$ 813,870 146,492 67,772 1,748 9,345 31,274 904,924 |
$ 879,693 196,500 67,506 15,112 19,349 52,795 986,798 |
$ 735,163 211,870 66,694 -0- 44,039 56,653 964,773 |
Total Net sales to external customers Depreciation and amortization Impairment and restructuring charges Receipt of CDSOA payment Earnings before interest and taxes Capital expenditures Assets employed at year-end |
$ 2,447,178 152,467 54,689 31,019 1,550 102,347 2,533,084 |
$ 2,643,008 151,047 27,754 -0- 98,248 162,717 2,564,105 |
$ 2,495,034 149,949 -0- -0- 124,587 173,222 2,441,318 |
Income Before Income Taxes Total EBIT for reportable segments Interest expense Interest income Intersegment adjustments |
$ 1,550 (33,401) 2,109 2,859 |
$ 98,248 (31,922) 3,479 792 |
$ 124,587 (27,225) 3,096 (1,467) |
(Loss) income before income taxes | $ (26,883) | $ 70,597 | $ 98,991 |
(5) It is impracticable for the company to restate 1999 segment financial information into Automotive Bearings and Industrial Bearings as this structure was not in place at that time.
The Company evaluates operating performance based on each segments profit before interest and income taxes. Therefore, interest expense and interest income are maintained at a corporate level and are not shown on a segmented basis.
37 |
notes to consolidated financial statements
13 INCOME TAXES
The provision (credit) for income taxes consisted of the following:
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||
Current | Deferred | Current | Deferred | Current | Deferred | |
(Thousands of dollars) United States: Federal State and local Foreign |
$ (18,523) 2,332 7,961 |
$ 22,620 (628) 1,021 |
$ (1,093) 1,775 13,442 |
$ 13,093 (995) (1,513) |
$ 9,988 (552) 6,171 |
$ 20,884 2,835 (2,959) |
$ (8,230) | $ 23,013 | $ 14,124 | $ 10,585 | $ 15,607 | $ 20,760 |
The company made income tax payments of approximately $7,210,000 in 2001;$17,520,000 in 2000;and $14,760,000 in 1999. Taxes paid differ from current taxes provided, primarily due to the timing of payments.
The effect of temporary differences giving rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2001 and 2000 was as follows:
2001 | 2000 | |
(Thousands of dollars) Deferred tax assets: Accrued postretirement benefits cost Accrued pension cost Benefit accruals Tax loss and credit carryforwards Othernet Valuation allowance |
$ 170,975 67,571 18,473 33,787 12,754 (34,756) |
$ 159,014 31,920 25,603 16,439 12,960 (18,084) |
Deferred tax liabilitydepreciation | 268,804 (198,746) |
227,852 (196,500) |
Net deferred tax asset | $ 70,058 | $ 31,352 |
Following is the reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to income before taxes:
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |
(Thousands of dollars) Income tax (credit) at the statutory federal rate Adjustments: State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit Tax on foreign remittances Non-deductible unrealized exchange losses Foreign tax credits Losses without current tax benefits Settlements and claims for prior years Valuation allowance Other items |
$ (9,409) 1,107 476 779 -0- 20,854 -0- (723) 1,699 |
$ 24,709 507 1,617 587 (2,702) 5,177 (5,125) (1,402) 1,341 |
$ 34,647 1,484 1,216 1,548 (2,205) -0- -0- -0- (323) |
Provision for income taxes | $ 14,783 | $ 24,709 | $ 36,367 |
Effective income tax rate | N/A | 35% | 37% |
38
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
The Timken Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets of The Timken Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, |
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Timken Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Ernst & Young LLP |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements set forth in this annual report
(including the companys forecasts, beliefs and expectations) that are not historical
in nature are "forward-looking" statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular the Corporate Profile on pages 16
through 18 and Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 20 through 27 contain
numerous forward-looking statements. The company cautions readers that actual results may
differ materially from those projected or implied in forward-looking statements made by or
on behalf of the company due to a variety of important factors, such as: a) changes in world economic conditions, including additional adverse effects
from terrorism or hostilities. This includes the potential instability of governments and
legal systems in countries in which the company or its customers conduct business and
significant changes in currency valuations b) the effects of changes in customer demand on sales, product mix
and prices. This includes the effects of customer strikes, the impact of changes in
industrial business cycles and whether conditions of fair trade continue in the U.S.
market, in light of the ITC voting in second quarter 2000 to revoke the antidumping orders
on imports of tapered roller bearings from Japan, Romania and Hungary. c) competitive factors, including changes in market penetration, increasing price competition by existing or new foreign and domestic competitors, the introduction of new products by existing and new competitors and new technology that may impact the way the company's products are sold or distributed. |
d) changes in operating costs. This includes the effect of changes
in the company's manufacturing processes; changes in costs associated with varying levels
of operations; changes resulting from inventory management and cost reduction initiatives
and different levels of customer demands; the effects of unplanned work stoppages; changes
in the cost of labor and benefits; and the cost and availability of raw materials and
energy.
The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. |
39 |
summary of operations and other comparative data
(Thousands of dollars, except per share data)
2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | |
Statements of Income Net sales: Automotive Bearings Industrial Bearings Total Bearings Steel |
$ 751,029 882,279 1,633,308 813,870 |
$ 839,838 923,477 1,763,315 879,693 |
(5) (5) 1,759,871 735,163 |
(5) (5) 1,797,745 882,096 |
Total net sales | 2,447,178 | 2,643,008 | 2,495,034 | 2,679,841 |
Cost of products sold Selling, administrative and general expenses Impairment and restructuring charges Operating (loss) income Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) Interest expense (Loss) income before income taxes Provision (credit) for income taxes (Loss) income before cumulative effect of accounting changes Net (loss) income |
2,046,458 363,683 54,689 (17,652) 4,409 33,401 (26,883) 14,783 (41,666) $ (41,666) |
2,142,135 367,499 27,754 105,620 99,040 31,922 70,597 24,709 45,888 $ 45,888 |
2,002,366 359,910 -0- 132,758 123,120 27,225 98,991 36,367 62,624 $ 62,624 |
2,098,186 356,672 -0- 224,983 208,866 26,502 185,350 70,813 114,537 $ 114,537 |
Balance Sheets Inventory Current assets Working capital Property, plant and equipment (less depreciation) Total assets Total debt Total liabilities Shareholders equity |
$ 429,231 828,380 187,224 1,305,346 2,533,084 497,015 1,751,349 $ 781,735 |
$ 489,549 898,542 311,090 1,363,772 2,564,105 514,064 1,559,423 $ 1,004,682 |
$ 446,588 833,526 348,455 1,381,474 2,441,318 449,890 1,395,337 $ 1,045,981 |
$ 457,246 850,337 359,914 1,349,539 2,450,031 469,398 1,393,950 $ 1,056,081 |
Other Comparative Data Net (loss) income/Total assets Net (loss) income/Net sales EBIT/Beginning invested capital (1) Inventory days (FIFO) Net sales per associate (2) Capital expenditures Depreciation and amortization Capital expenditures/Depreciation Dividends per share Earnings per share (3) Earnings per share - assuming dilution (3) Debt to total capital Number of associates at year-end Number of shareholders (4) |
(1.6)% (1.7)% 0.2% 104.8 $ 124.8 $ 102,347 $ 152,467 69.9% $ 0.67 $ (0.69) $ (0.69) 38.9% 18,735 39,919 |
1.8% 1.7% 4.7% 108.5 $ 127.9 $ 162,717 $ 151,047 112.4% $ 0.72 $ 0.76 $ 0.76 33.9% 20,474 42,661 |
2.6% 2.5% 5.6% 108.4 $ 119.1 $ 173,222 $ 149,949 120.3% $ 0.72 $ 1.01 $ 1.01 30.1% 20,856 42,907 |
4.7% 4.3% 10.5% 109.4 $ 127.5 $ 258,621 $ 139,833 192.5% $ 0.72 $ 1.84 $ 1.82 30.8% 21,046 45,942 |
40
THE TIMKEN COMPANY |
1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 | 1992 |
(5) (5) 1,718,876 898,686 |
(5) (5) 1,598,040 796,717 |
(5) (5) 1,524,728 705,776 |
(5) (5) 1,312,323 618,028 |
(5) (5) 1,153,987 554,774 |
(5) (5) 1,169,035 473,275 |
2,617,562 | 2,394,757 | 2,230,504 | 1,930,351 | 1,708,761 | 1,642,310 |
2,005,374 332,419 -0- 279,769 286,766 21,432 266,592 95,173 171,419 $ 171,419 |
1,828,394 319,458 -0- 246,905 242,304 17,899 225,259 86,322 138,937 $ 138,937 |
1,723,463 304,046 -0- 202,995 197,957 19,813 180,174 67,824 112,350 $ 112,350 |
1,514,098 283,727 -0- 132,526 134,674 24,872 111,323 42,859 68,464 $ 68,464 |
1,369,711 276,928 48,000 14,122 7,843 29,619 (20,919) (3,250) (17,669) $ (271,932) |
1,300,744 299,305 -0- 42,261 40,606 28,660 13,431 8,979 4,452 $ 4,452 |
$ 445,853 855,171 275,607 1,220,516 2,326,550 359,431 1,294,474 $ 1,032,076 |
$ 419,507 793,633 265,685 1,094,329 2,071,338 302,665 1,149,110 $ 922,228 |
$ 367,889 710,258 247,895 1,039,382 1,925,925 211,232 1,104,747 $ 821,178 |
$ 332,304 657,180 178,556 1,030,451 1,858,734 279,519 1,125,843 $ 732,891 |
$ 299,783 586,384 153,971 1,024,664 1,789,719 276,476 1,104,407 $ 685,312 |
$ 310,947 556,017 165,553 1,049,004 1,738,450 320,515 753,387 $ 985,063 |
7.4% 6.5% 16.1% 111.5 $ 130.5 $ 229,932 $ 134,431 177.3% $ 0.66 $ 2.73 $ 2.69 25.8% 20,994 46,394 |
6.7% 5.8% 15.1% 117.5 $ 132.4 $ 155,925 $ 126,457 127.0% $ 0.60 $ 2.21 $ 2.19 24.7% 19,130 31,813 |
5.8% 5.0% 12.6% 112.2 $ 134.2 $ 131,188 $ 123,409 109.1% $ 0.555 $ 1.80 $ 1.78 20.5% 17,034 26,792 |
3.7% 3.5% 9.0% 118.0 $ 119.9 $ 119,656 $ 119,255 102.6% $ 0.50 $ 1.11 $ 1.10 27.6% 16,202 49,968 |
(15.2)% (15.9)% 0.5% 122.5 $ 104.5 $ 92,940 $ 118,403 80.2% $ 0.50 $ (0.29) $ (0.29) 28.7% 15,985 28,767 |
0.3% 0.3% 2.5% 137.8 $ 95.3 $ 139,096 $ 114,433 124.4% $ 0.50 $ 0.07 $ 0.07 24.5% 16,729 31,395 |
(1)EBIT/Beginning invested capital, a type of return on asset ratio, is used internally
to measure the companys performance. In broad terms, invested capital is total
assets minus non-interest-bearing current liabilities.
(2)Based on the average number of associates employed during the year.
(3)Based on the average number of shares outstanding during the year and excludes the
cumulative effect of accounting changes in 1993, which related to the adoption of FAS No.
106, 109 and 112.
(4)Includes an estimated count of shareholders having common stock held for their accounts
by banks, brokers and trustees for benefit plans.
(5)It is impracticable for the company to restate prior year segment financial information
into Automotive Bearings and Industrial Bearings as this structure was not in place until
2000.
41 |
APPENDIX TO EXHIBIT 13
On page 1 of the printed document, three bar charts were shown which contain the following
information:
(1) | Net Sales ($ Millions) | |
---|---|---|
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 |
2,618 2,680 2,495 2,643 2,447 |
|
(2) | Dividends per Share (cents) | |
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 |
.66 .72 .72 .72 .67 |
|
(3) | Inventory Days | |
1992 1995 1998 2001 |
137.8 112.2 109.4 104.8 |
On page 40 of the printed document, two bar charts were shown that contain the following
information:
(1) | Total Net Sales to Customers (Billions of dollars) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Automotive and Industrial Bearings |
Steel | ||
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 |
1.169 1.154 1.312 1.525 1.598 1.719 1.798 1.760 1.763 1.633 |
0.473 0.555 0.618 0.706 0.797 0.899 0.882 0.735 0.880 0.814 |
|
(2) | EBIT/Beginning Invested Capital | ||
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 |
2.5% 0.5% 9.0% 12.6% 15.1% 16.1% 10.5% 5.6% 4.7% 0.2% |