UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o	Preliminary Proxy Statement
o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x	Definitive Proxy Statement
o	Definitive Additional Material
o	Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

TENNANT COMPANY

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

xNo fee required.

oFee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.

oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:

Tennant Company

701 North Lilac Drive

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422

March 19, 2020

Dear Shareholder,

Tennant Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Wednesday, April 29, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Central Time. This year’s Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of shareholders. You may attend the meeting and vote your shares electronically during the meeting via the Internet by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TNC2020.

The attached Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement describe the business to be conducted at the meeting. We have chosen to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. We believe that providing our proxy materials over the Internet reduces the environmental impact of our meeting without limiting our shareholders’ access to important information about Tennant.

Whether or not you plan on joining the meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. We encourage you to read the Proxy Statement and vote your shares, as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as soon as possible. You may also follow the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to vote by telephone or request a paper proxy card, which will include a reply envelope, to submit your vote by mail.

We appreciate your continued confidence in Tennant and look forward to you joining the virtual meeting.

Sincerely,

Mary E. Talbott

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Table of Contents

Tennant Company Proxy Statement	1
Board of Directors	5
Information, Qualifications, Experience and Tenure	5
Meeting Attendance	12
Director Independence	12
Board Leadership Structure	13
Board Oversight of Strategy and Risk	14
Board Committees	16
Board and Committee Self-Evaluation Process	18
Board and Committee Member Nominations and Appointments	18
Communication with the Board of Directors	19
Committee Charters and Other Governance Documents	19
Director Compensation	19
Item 1—Election of Directors	22
Audit Committee and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Information	23
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	23
Audit Committee Report	23
Item 2—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	24
Executive Compensation Information	25
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	25
Compensation Committee Report	38
Summary Compensation Table	39
Grants of Plan-Based Awards	41
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2019 Fiscal Year-End	42
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2019	43
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation in 2019	43
Agreements and Arrangements with Named Executives	44
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control	48
Pay Ratio	48
Item 3—Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation	50
Item 4—Approval of the Tennant Company 2020 Stock Incentive Plan	51
Other Information	58
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	58
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance	59
Related-Person Transaction Approval Policy	59
Political Contribution Policy	60
Shareholder Proposals	60

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Time and Date:	Wednesday, April 29, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Central Time
How to Attend:	The meeting will be completely virtual. You may attend the online meeting and vote your shares electronically during the meeting via the Internet by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TNC2020. To enter the Annual Meeting you will need the 16-digit control number that is printed in the box marked by the arrow on your Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials. We recommend that you log in at least 15 minutes before the meeting to ensure that you are logged in when the meeting starts.
Items of Business:	(1)Elect three Class I directors for three-year terms;
	(2)Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020;
	(3)Advisory approval of executive compensation; and
	(4)Approval of the Tennant Company 2020 Stock Incentive Plan.
Who May Vote:	You may vote if you were a shareholder of record as of the close of business on March 2, 2020.
Proxy Voting:	It is important that your shares are voted, whether or not you join the virtual meeting. You are encouraged to vote your shares, as instructed in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as soon as possible. You may also follow the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to vote by telephone or request a paper proxy card, which will include a reply envelope, to submit your vote by mail. Your prompt response will help reduce solicitation costs incurred by us.
	Mary E. Talbott, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
	March 19, 2020

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 29, 2020:
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 2020 Proxy Statement and 2019 Annual Report
are available at www.proxyvote.com.

TENNANT COMPANY PROXY STATEMENT

WHY DID I RECEIVE A NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS?

Tennant Company (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “company”), on behalf of its Board of Directors, is providing this Proxy Statement in order to obtain your vote in connection with its 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”).

The completely virtual Annual Meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 29, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Central Time at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TNC2020.

The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is being first mailed to shareholders on or about March 19, 2020.

HOW DO I ACCESS THE PROXY MATERIALS?

Under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders via the Internet, rather than mailing printed copies.

If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one as instructed in that notice. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials and vote via the Internet.

If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

WHAT IS A PROXY?

The proxy serves as a ballot for elections to our Board, and it provides information about other items to be discussed and voted on at the Annual Meeting. It allows an authorized agent to act on your behalf in the event you do not attend the Annual Meeting.

WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?

You may vote if you owned shares of our common stock as of the close of business on March 2, 2020. As of March 2, 2020, there were 18,426,186 shares of common stock outstanding, each entitled to one vote.

HOW DO I VOTE?

You may vote in one of four ways:

1.By Internet

You may access the website at www.proxyvote.com to cast your vote 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 28, 2020. Please have your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or, if you have requested one, your proxy card, in hand and the last four digits of your social security number available to verify your identity. Follow the instructions provided to obtain your records and create an electronic ballot.

1

2.By Phone

Request a proxy card from us by following the instructions on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. You may then call 1-800-690-6903 by using any touch-tone phone, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on April 28, 2020. Have your proxy card in hand when calling. You will need to provide the last four digits of your social security number to verify your identity. Follow the voice prompts to cast your vote.

3.By Mail

Request a proxy card from us by following the instructions on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope that will be provided, or return it to Tennant Company, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

4.Online during the Annual Meeting

All shareholders may vote online during the Annual Meeting through the link www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TNC2020. The 16-digit control number provided on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card is necessary to access this site. See below for instructions on voting if your shares are held through a third party.

WHAT HAPPENS IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN AN ACCOUNT AT A BROKERAGE FIRM, BANK, BROKER-DEALER OR SIMILAR ORGANIZATION?

If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the shareholder of record for purposes of voting online during the Annual Meeting.

As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. You should follow the instructions received from that organization to vote your shares. Shares held beneficially in street name may be voted online during the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares.

WHAT HAPPENS IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN THE TENNANT COMPANY RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN?

If your shares are held in the Tennant Company Retirement Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”), your vote will be communicated to the Trustee who will vote all shares held in the Savings Plan in proportion to votes cast by all participants who submit voting instructions. Your proxy includes any shares you hold in the Savings Plan. To be effective, your voting instructions must be received by the Trustee by April 24, 2020. Shares held in the Savings Plan may not be voted online during the Annual Meeting.

CAN THE TRUSTEE VOTE MY SHARES ON MY BEHALF WITHOUT RECEIVING VOTING INSTRUCTIONS FROM ME?

The Trustee will vote all shares held in the Savings Plan in proportion to votes cast by all participants who submit voting instructions timely. You should vote your shares by following the instructions described above and set forth on your proxy card.

WHY SHOULD I VOTE?

Your vote ensures that your ownership interests are represented even if you are unable to join the Annual Meeting online. A promptly voted proxy will save us additional solicitation expense.

2

MAY I REVOKE MY PROXY OR CHANGE MY VOTE?

Proxies may be revoked at any time before being voted online during the Annual Meeting. The proxy may be revoked or changed only by use of the following methods:

·Sending a signed, written notice of revocation, dated later than the proxy, to the attention of our Corporate Secretary at the address listed on page 4 of this Proxy Statement;

·Sending a signed proxy, dated later than the prior proxy, to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717;

·Voting again by telephone or on the Internet prior to the Annual Meeting; or

·Joining the online Annual Meeting and voting online during the meeting.

For shares held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, or in the Savings Plan, see restrictions described above.

HOW MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED TO HOLD THE ANNUAL MEETING?

The meeting can take place when holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock, either online or by proxy, are present at the meeting. This is known as a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present when determining whether a quorum exists.

WHAT IS A BROKER NON-VOTE?

Broker non-votes are shares held of record by a broker that are not voted on a matter because the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and either lacks or declines to exercise the authority to vote the shares in its discretion.

HOW MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED TO APPROVE EACH OF THE PROPOSALS AND HOW ARE VOTES COUNTED?

The table below summarizes the vote required to approve each proposal and how votes are counted:

	Vote Required	Voting Options	Board Recommendation1	Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed2	Impact of Abstention
Item 1: Elect three Class I directors to three-year terms	Majority of votes cast (the votes cast FOR the nominee exceed the votes cast AGAINST the nominee)3	FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN	FOR	No	None
Item 2: Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020	Majority of shares present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote4	FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN	FOR	Yes	AGAINST
Item 3: Advisory approval of executive compensation	We will consider shareholders to have approved the advisory vote on our executive compensation if the votes cast FOR exceed the votes cast AGAINST	FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN	FOR	No	None
Item 4: Approve the Tennant Company 2020 Stock Incentive Plan	Majority of shares present or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote4	FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN	FOR	No	AGAINST

3

1If you submit a proxy without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations set forth in the table.

2If broker discretionary voting is not allowed, your broker will not be able to vote your shares on these matters. A broker non-vote will have no effect on the matter except in the case of Item 4 where a broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST if a majority of the voting power of the minimum number of shares entitled to vote that would constitute a quorum at the annual meeting is required in order to approve the item as described in footnote (4) below.

3To address a provision in Minnesota law that allows a director who has not been re-elected to remain in office until a successor is elected and qualified, we have a policy requiring any director who does not receive a greater number of votes FOR than AGAINST his or her election in an uncontested election to tender his or her resignation from the Board. Under this policy, the Board, upon recommendation of our Governance Committee, will determine whether to accept or reject the offer to resign and disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days after the date of the election. The text of this policy appears in our Corporate Governance Principles, which is available on our website.

4If greater, the vote required is a majority of the voting power of the minimum number of shares entitled to vote that would constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting.

WHO WILL PAY THE COST OF THIS PROXY SOLICITATION?

We will bear the cost of solicitation. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by directors, officers, employees or others, in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. No additional compensation will be paid to such persons for such solicitation. We will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses incurred by them in sending proxy materials to beneficial owners of shares.

WHY IS THE ANNUAL MEETING VIRTUAL AND CAN I SUBMIT QUESTIONS?

Hosting a virtual Annual Meeting provides expanded access, improved communication and cost savings for our shareholders and us and enables shareholder participation from any location around the world. Shareholders may submit questions during the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TNC2020, and management will respond to questions in the same way as it would if the company held an in-person meeting. If you have questions, you may type them in the dialog box provided at any point during the meeting until the floor is closed to questions.

WHAT ADDRESS SHOULD I USE FOR CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE COMPANY?

The address for our principal executive office is 701 North Lilac Drive, P.O. Box 1452, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55440-1452.

4

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

INFORMATION, QUALIFICATIONS, EXPERIENCE AND TENURE

Directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting are Class I directors Carol S. Eicher, Maria C. Green, and Donal L. Mulligan.

Director Nominees for Terms Expiring in 2023 (Class I Directors):

	CAROL S. EICHER, 61	Director Since 2008
	·Non-executive board chairman of Innocor, Inc. (a Bain Capital portfolio company), a designer and manufacturer of advanced foam products, from August 2017 to April 2018.
	·Chief Executive Officer of Innocor, Inc., from May 2014 to July 2017.
	·Business President for Coating Materials and Building and Construction for The Dow Chemical Company from September 2012 to July 2013; Business Group Vice President for Building and Construction for Dow Chemical from August 2010 to August 2012; Business Director, Performance Monomers, for Dow Chemical from April 2009 to July 2010.
	·Vice President/Global Business Director, Primary Materials and Process Chemicals, Rohm and Haas Company, a developer of solutions for the specialty materials industry acquired by Dow Chemical in 2009, from 2003 to July 2010; General Manager, Americas & Europe, Electronics, Organic Specialties, for Rohm and Haas from 2001 to 2003; Business Director, Organic Specialties for Rohm and Haas from 2000 to 2001.
	·Held various senior management positions with Ashland Chemical Company, a division of Ashland, Inc., from 1992 to 2000.
	·Held various management positions with E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Inc., from 1979 to 1992.
	·Member of the Board of Directors of A. Schulman, Inc., from 2018 to 2019.
	·Member of the Board of Directors of Advanced Emission Solutions, Chair of the Governance Committee.
	·Chair of the Governance Committee, member of the Compensation and Executive Committees.
	Ms. Eicher brings a wealth of global manufacturing, operations and merger and acquisition experience from her senior leadership positions at Innocor, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company, Rohm and Haas Company, Ashland Chemical Company and E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Inc. In these positions she has led expansion efforts in developing countries and can provide insights as to the issues we may face as we expand our presence in Brazil, China and other developing countries.

5

	MARIA C. GREEN, 67	Director Since 2019
	·Former Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Ingersoll Rand plc, a world leader in creating comfortable, sustainable and efficient environments, October 2015 to June 2019.
	·Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Illinois Tool Works Inc., a global manufacturer of value-added consumables and specialty equipment, from 2012 to October 2015; Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 2011 to 2012; Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from 2008 to 2011; Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from 1997 to 2008.
	·Vice President Real Estate Development of Chicago Transit Authority from 1996 to September 1997.
	·General Counsel and Director of Commercial Development of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) from 1994 to 1996.
	·Associate General Counsel Corporate Affairs of Amtrak from 1989 to 1994.
	·Senior Associate, Hazel, Thomas Fiske, Beckhorn & Hanes, P.C. from 1987 to 1989.
	·Associate, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld from 1986 to 1987.
	·Attorney, Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. from 1981 to 1985.
	·Member of the Board of Directors and Governance and Nominating Committee of Wisconsin Energy Group.
	·Member of the Governance and Executive Committees.
	Ms. Green was selected by the Board because of her extensive experience in public company corporate governance, global legal and compliance and international matters. Ms. Green also brings extensive public company experience in the areas of acquisitions, enterprise risk management, environmental health, safety and sustainability and shareholder engagement. This experience will be particularly valuable as we focus on successful global business integrations, achievement of acquisition-related synergies and maximizing shareholder value.

6

	DONAL L. MULLIGAN, 59	Director Since 2009
	·Current Senior Advisor to Chief Executive Officer, General Mills, Inc.  Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for General Mills, Inc., one of the world’s largest food companies, from 2007 to February 2020.
	·Held various executive positions with General Mills from 2001 to 2007, including Vice President Financial Operations for the International division; Vice President Financial Operations for Operations and Technology; and Vice President and Treasurer.
	·Served as Chief Financial Officer, International, for The Pillsbury Company from 1999 to 2001.
	·Held various international positions with PepsiCo Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc., including Regional CFO, Americas; Finance Director, Asia; and Finance Director, Canada, from 1987 to 1998.
	·Chair of the Audit Committee, member of the Governance and Executive Committees.
	Mr. Mulligan was selected by the Board not only because of his financial expertise and his various senior financial and operations leadership positions at large multinational public companies, but also because of his knowledge in developing, marketing and branding innovative products, which is particularly relevant to our business.

7

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2021 (Class II Director):

	AZITA ARVANI, 57	Director Since 2012
	·General Manager of Rakuten Mobile, Inc., Americas, a part of Rakuten Group, a global mobile communications company, since March 2020.
	·Head of Innovation Partner & Venture Management for Nokia, a global communications, information technology and consumer electronics company, from March 2017 to March 2019; Head of Global Innovation Scouting from January 2016 to February 2017.
	·Head of Innovation Partnering & Ecosystem Ventures for Nokia Networks from July 2015 to December 2015; Head of Innovation Partnering from September 2014 to July 2015.
	·Head of Partnering and Alliances for Nokia Solutions and Networks from September 2012 to August 2014.
	·Head of Innovation Strategy for Nokia Siemens from September 2011 to August 2012.
	·Principal and Founder of Arvani Group Inc., a boutique business consulting firm specializing in the mobile and wireless industry, from 2002 to 2011.
	·Vice President, Business Development and Strategy, for ActiveSky, a provider of an online mobile multimedia application development and distribution platform, from 2000 to 2001.
	·Held various senior technical and business positions, including Director, Corporate Business Strategy for Xerox Corporation, a business process and document management company, from 1996 to 2000.
	·Member of the Compensation, Governance and Executive Committees.
	Ms. Arvani, through her work with Nokia and prior responsibilities, brings extensive experience in disruptive technologies, commercializing innovations, partnerships and ecosystems. As an executive leader and a consultant, she has helped a diverse set of companies develop and commercialize game-changing technologies. Her experience in new technologies and innovations is particularly valuable as we evolve our telemetry, robotics and sustainable cleaning technologies.

8

	STEVEN A. SONNENBERG, 67	Director Since 2005 Lead Director Since 2016
	·Retired from Emerson Automation Solutions, a business unit of Emerson Electric Company, a worldwide technology and engineering company, in September 2019; Senior Advisor of Emerson from January 2018 to September 2019.
	·Chairman, Emerson Automation Solutions from May 2016 to December 2017.
	·Executive Vice President, Emerson Electric Company, and President for Emerson Process Management from 2008 to April 2016.
	·President for Rosemount, Inc., a business unit of Emerson Electric Company, from 2002 to October 2008. Held various positions with Rosemount and Emerson, including General Manager for Rosemount China and President for Emerson Process Management Asia Pacific, from 1992 to 2002.
	·Member of the Board of Directors, Governance Committee and Audit Committee of Steel Dynamics, Inc.
	·Lead Director, Chair of the Executive Committee, member of the Audit and Governance Committees.
	Mr. Sonnenberg is an expert in global sales, operations and expansion. His leadership roles with Emerson Electric Company and its various divisions have helped him acquire a specific expertise in process improvement, grounded in systems and metrics that are critical to successful, scalable growth and expansion, which applies directly to our process improvement and growth initiatives. Mr. Sonnenberg’s experience with global acquisitions and joint ventures, and his expertise in emerging markets, are also very valuable as we grow our global business.

9

	DAVID S. WICHMANN, 57	Director Since 2009
	·Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, a diversified health and well-being company, since September 2017.
	·Held various executive positions with UnitedHealth Group since 1998, including President for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated from November 2014 to August 2017, Chief Financial Officer for UnitedHealth Group Incorporated from January 2011 to June 2016; President, Operations and Technology, UnitedHealth Group; President, Commercial Market Group, UnitedHealthcare; President and Chief Operating Officer, UnitedHealthcare; President and Chief Executive Officer, Specialized Care Services, Optum; and Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, UnitedHealth Group.
	·Partner, Arthur Andersen, from 1995 to 1998.
	·Chief Financial Officer for Advance Machine Company from 1992 to 1994.
	·Member of the Audit, Compensation and Executive Committees.
	Mr. Wichmann was selected by the Board for his global financial operations, merger and acquisitions and business integration expertise. In addition to being a seasoned senior executive with UnitedHealth Group, Mr. Wichmann has experience across multiple businesses through his early consulting practice with Arthur Andersen and as Chief Financial Officer of a company in our industry. Mr. Wichmann’s understanding of business processes, finance, accounting and internal controls adds further discipline to our growth initiatives.

10

Directors Whose Terms Expire in 2022 (Class III Directors):

	WILLIAM F. AUSTEN, 61	Director Since 2007
	·Former President, Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors for Bemis Company, Inc., a global flexible packaging company, from August 2014 until his retirement in June 2019.
	·Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Bemis from November 2013 to August 2014; Group President for Bemis from May 2012 to October 2013; Vice President, Operations, for Bemis from 2004 to April 2012.
	·President and Chief Executive Officer for Morgan Adhesives Company from 2000 to 2004.
	·Held various positions with General Electric Company from 1980 to 2000, culminating in General Manager, Switch Gear Business.
	·Member of the Audit, Compensation and Executive Committees.
	Mr. Austen brings a broad strategic perspective as the top leader at Bemis Company where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer. He is a talented leader in global manufacturing and operations with experience in global mergers, acquisitions and business integration. This experience is relevant to our business, including our international operations and growth initiatives.

	H. CHRIS KILLINGSTAD, 64	Director Since 2005
	·President and Chief Executive Officer for Tennant Company since 2005.
	·Vice President, North America, for Tennant from 2002 to 2005.
	·Held various senior management positions with The Pillsbury Company, including Senior Vice President and General Manager, from 1990 to 2002.
	·International Business Development Manager for PepsiCo Inc. from 1982 to 1990.
	·Financial Manager for General Electric from 1978 to 1980.
	Mr. Killingstad, our President and Chief Executive Officer, through his work with General Electric, PepsiCo Inc. and The Pillsbury Company, as well as with the company, has led global expansion and turnaround efforts and has developed expertise in the areas of product innovation, brand marketing and building strong leadership teams.

11

	DAVID WINDLEY, 56	Director Since 2016
	·President for IQTalent Partners, a professional services firm focused on talent acquisition, since September 2014.
	·Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer, for Fusion-io, Inc., a computer hardware and software systems company, from October 2013 to August 2014.
	·Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer, for Yahoo! Inc. from December 2006 to September 2012.
	·General Manager, Human Resources, for Microsoft Corporation from December 2003 to December 2006.
	·Vice President Human Resources, Business Units, for Intuit Inc. from December 2001 to December 2003.
	·Held various positions with Silicon Graphics, Inc., from 1991 to 2001, culminating in Vice President, Human Resources.
	·Member of the Board of Directors of DHI Group, Inc.
	·Chair of the Compensation Committee and member of the Governance and Executive Committees.
	Mr. Windley has extensive global human resources management, succession planning and executive compensation expertise from his executive roles with IQTalent Partners, Fusion-io, Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. His experience with leading technologies will be particularly valuable as we expand how we use digital technology in our products and our go-to-market initiatives.

MEETING ATTENDANCE

During 2019, the Board met on four occasions. During 2019, all directors attended 98% of the meetings of the Board and any Board committees of which they were members in 2019. As set forth in the Corporate Governance Principles, all members of the Board are encouraged to attend the annual meetings of shareholders. All then serving directors attended the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our Board uses criteria established by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission to determine director independence. The Governance Committee reviews relevant information no less than annually to determine whether the Board members meet the applicable criteria. The Board has determined that Mmes. Arvani, Eicher and Green and Messrs. Austen, Mulligan, Sonnenberg, Wichmann and Windley are independent based on the standards referred to above.

The only relationships that exist between directors and the company or management are ordinary course of business commercial transactions involving the purchase of our products and product maintenance services by companies that employ certain directors or our purchase of products and services from companies that employ certain directors. These transactions were considered by the Board in determining director independence.

The Board considered the fact that the following non-employee directors are affiliated with entities that during 2019 purchased goods and/or product maintenance services from us or from whom we purchased goods and/or services, all in the ordinary course of business, as follows:

12

Director	Affiliated Entity and Relationship	Transactions	Amount Involved as% of Affiliated Entity’s Annual Revenues
William F. Austen	Bemis Company, Inc. Former President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	We sell goods and/or product maintenance services to Bemis	Less than 1%
Maria C. Green	Ingersoll Rand, plc Former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	We sell goods and/or product maintenance services to Ingersoll We purchase product from Ingersoll	Less than 1% Less than 1%
Donal L. Mulligan	General Mills, Inc. Advisor; Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	We sell goods and/or product maintenance services to General Mills	Less than 1%
Steven A. Sonnenberg	Emerson Electric Company Former Senior Advisor	We sell goods and/or product maintenance services to Emerson	Less than 1%
David S. Wichmann	UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Chief Executive Officer and Director	We purchase services from UnitedHealth Group	Less than 1%

Based on the relevant facts and circumstances, Messrs. Austen, Mulligan, Sonnenberg and Wichmann and Ms. Green do not have a material interest in these ordinary course of business transactions. The Board was provided with this information and concluded that none of the relationships interfere with the independence of these directors or present a conflict of interest.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Our Board has four standing committees: Audit, Compensation, Governance and Executive. Each of the Board committees is comprised solely of independent directors with each committee having its own chair.

Our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Mr. Killingstad, is a member of the Board. However, he does not serve as Chair of the Board. Mr. Killingstad works closely with the Lead Director, Mr. Sonnenberg, to set and approve the agenda of Board meetings, to ensure that there is an appropriate flow of information to and from the Board, and to ensure that management properly and adequately addresses matters of interest to the Board.

Mr. Killingstad conducts the actual Board meetings, but Mr. Sonnenberg facilitates meetings of the Board in the absence of the CEO and conducts, as Chair, the meetings of the Executive Committee, which consists of all non-employee directors. Currently, the positions of Lead Director and Chair of the Executive Committee are combined.

The Lead Director is appointed for a one-year term and may serve successive terms, but the Board retains the right to remove or replace the Lead Director in its discretion. The Board originally appointed Mr. Sonnenberg Chair of the Executive Committee and Lead Director in August 2016 and has continued to elect him annually. The Board’s criterion for Lead Director is that he or she must be an independent director appointed by the Board and elected by a majority of the Board.

The role of the Lead Director is to provide independent leadership to the Board, act as a liaison between the independent directors and the company and ensure that the Board operates independently of management. The principal responsibilities assigned to the Lead Director include:

·facilitating the meeting of the Board in the absence of the CEO;

·organizing and presiding over all executive sessions of the Board and serving as Chair of the Executive Committee;

13

·serving as liaison between the independent directors and the CEO;

·in concert with the CEO and other directors, creating the agendas for Board meetings, including approval of schedules to assure sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items, with final approval of agendas from the Lead Director;

·in concert with the CEO and committee chairs, ensuring the appropriate flow of information to the Board and reviewing the adequacy and timing of materials provided to the Board;

·communicating to management, as appropriate, the results of private discussions among independent directors;

·holding one-on-one discussions with individual directors where requested by the directors or the Board;

·ensuring his or her availability for consultation and direct communication with major shareholders, if requested by such shareholders;

·in concert with the Governance Committee, managing and facilitating the Board governance process;

·in concert with the Governance Committee, managing the Board evaluation process;

·leading the CEO evaluation and Board peer review processes;

·providing guidance on director orientation and committee assignments;

·leading the Board in crisis and transitional periods; and

·coordinating and leading all other general Board activities otherwise not covered by one of the Board committees and carrying out other duties as requested by the Board.

Currently, the Board has chosen this leadership structure because it believes that it fosters good communication between management and the Board, provides strong independent leadership to oversee and challenge management and provides the optimal level of Board involvement in strategic decision-making and risk oversight.

BOARD OVERSIGHT OF STRATEGY AND RISK

General

Our Board takes an active role in risk oversight of the company both as a full Board and through its committees. The agendas for the Board and committee meetings are specifically designed to include an assessment of opportunities and risks inherent in our operations, strategies and compensation plans.

Our Board typically meets in executive session at the beginning and at the end of each regularly scheduled meeting. The executive sessions are used to assist the Board in carrying out its duties, including risk oversight. We believe that the process followed by the independent directors and led by our Lead Director provides an appropriate level of risk oversight by the Board.

Annual Risk Assessment Process

We conduct an annual enterprise-wide risk assessment. A formal report is delivered to the Audit Committee and to the Board each December. Risk assessment updates are provided at each regularly scheduled quarterly Audit Committee meeting and more frequently if requested by a committee, our Board or recommended by management.

The objectives for the risk assessment process include (i) facilitating the NYSE governance requirement that the Audit Committee discuss policies around risk assessment and risk management, (ii) developing and addressing a defined list of key risks to be shared with the Audit Committee, Board and management, (iii) reviewing management’s risk mitigation efforts, (iv) determining whether there are risks that require additional or higher priority mitigation efforts, (v) facilitating discussion of the risk factors to be included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and (vi) guiding the development of the next year’s audit plans.

14

The risk assessment process is conducted by our outsourced internal auditor and through members of an internal risk committee consisting of senior level staff from the legal and finance departments and from the global business functions. Together they (i) review our enterprise risk assessment process, (ii) conduct a detailed enterprise risk assessment, including a survey of key department and functional leaders from all geographies, (iii) communicate the results of the risk assessment, (iv) evaluate management’s past mitigation efforts, (v) assess management’s preparedness to address the identified risks and (vi) assign a member of management to each risk identified to develop risk mitigation activities. The process links the risk areas with our strategies, objectives and entity-level controls where senior management and global employees participate in risk identification and ranking and assessment of management preparedness to address identified risks. The risk profiles and current and future mitigating actions are discussed and refined during subsequent discussions with senior management. Any identified risks are prioritized based on the potential exposure to the business and measured as a function of severity of impact and likelihood of occurrence, after taking into account management’s preparedness.

Non-Ordinary Course Expenditure Policy

To monitor transactions that could potentially expose the company to risk, the Board has a formal delegation-of- authority policy for non-ordinary course expenditures which specifies areas for which Board review and approval are required.

Compensation Risk Review

As part of our broader enterprise risk management efforts, management and the Compensation Committee annually review the risk associated with our executive and non-executive compensation plans and policies globally (for purposes of this discussion, “plans”) to ensure any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company are identified and controlled for or mitigated appropriately. We conduct a multi-step internal assessment with a final review conducted by the chief administration officer, chief financial officer and general counsel. Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC, the company’s independent compensation consultant (“Pearl Meyer”), is consulted throughout the risk assessment process.

In December 2019, management presented the Compensation Committee with an analysis of our compensation plans and a review of the key areas of potential risks. To assess whether the plans encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking, management considered the plan design, strategy and philosophy for cash and equity incentive plans, how the incentives are likely to impact employee behavior, the appropriateness of the plan metrics and what checks and balances exist to mitigate risks for inappropriate or fraudulent behavior. Management’s assessment was that the risks arising from our compensation plans do not encourage excessive risk-taking that would likely have a material effect on the company’s financial condition. The Compensation Committee discussed this conclusion with management and reviewed the level of enterprise risk associated with our executive and non-executive employee compensation plans.

Regarding the executive plans, the Compensation Committee concluded that the plans mitigate unnecessary risk, considering both designs and by the controls placed upon the designs, due to numerous factors:

·Balanced pay mix between fixed versus variable and cash versus equity	·Minimum performance requirements and maximum payout opportunities for incentive plans
·Incentive plan performance metrics are distinct and balance multiple measures of performance	·Our Compensation Committee can directly retain outside experts in fulfilling their charter obligations
·Performance targets are calibrated to align with our strategy and long-term value creation	·We maintain strong internal governance controls over the calculation of performance results
·Our Compensation Committee approves goals and payouts and has ultimate authority to adjust payments as necessary	·We maintain strong governance policies including ownership guidelines, a claw-back policy, and prohibitions on stock hedging or pledging

The plans of Gaomei Cleaning Equipment Company, the China based company acquired at the beginning of 2019 (“Gaomei”) will be included in our 2020 compensation risk assessment.

15

BOARD COMMITTEES

As mentioned above, we have four standing committees of the Board: Audit, Compensation, Governance and Executive. Membership on these committees is limited to independent directors. Each committee operates under a written charter and evaluates its charter annually.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee is comprised of Donal L. Mulligan (Chair), William F. Austen, Steven A. Sonnenberg and David S. Wichmann. Our Board uses the listing standards of the NYSE to determine whether the Audit Committee members possess the requisite financial literacy to serve on the committee. The Board has determined that all Audit Committee members are financially literate and independent.

At least one member of the Audit Committee must have accounting or related financial management expertise as required by NYSE rules. The Audit Committee endeavors to have at all times a member who qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board has determined that Messrs. Mulligan and Wichmann, each with extensive experience in financial management, and Mr. Wichmann being a certified public accountant, satisfy the requirements of an “audit committee financial expert,” and that their expertise has been acquired through training and relevant experience.

The Audit Committee is required to meet no less than four times throughout the year and in 2019 met on eight occasions.

The primary functions of the Audit Committee are to oversee:

·the integrity of our financial statements;

·compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

·the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance;

·the performance of the internal audit function;

·the performance of the system of internal controls over financial reporting;

·the ethics compliance program;

·risk assessment and risk management policies; and

·significant financial matters.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee is comprised of David Windley (Chair), Azita Arvani, William F. Austen, Carol S. Eicher and David S. Wichmann, all of whom meet the criteria for independence under the NYSE listing standards, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Compensation Committee is required to meet no less than four times throughout the year. In 2019, the Compensation Committee held four meetings.

A primary function of the Compensation Committee is to assist the company in maximizing shareholder value by ensuring that executive officers are compensated in accordance with our philosophy, objectives and policies. The Compensation Committee’s duties include, among other things, approving executive compensation policies and strategies; evaluating executive officers’ compensation levels and payouts against performance goals; approving and administering compensation plans; overseeing certain compensation disclosures in the proxy statement; and overseeing risks associated with our compensation policies and practices. In addition, in conjunction with its outside compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee recommends compensation levels for non-employee directors for approval by the Board.

16

Use of Outside Compensation Consultant

Our Compensation Committee engages Pearl Meyer to advise it on executive officer and non-employee director compensation. Pearl Meyer’s services include (i) making recommendations regarding the form and amounts of executive officer and non-employee director compensation, (ii) providing market and performance data as a backdrop to the committee’s decisions regarding executive officer and non-employee director compensation, and (iii) advising the committee as to best practices and recent legal, governance and regulatory considerations regarding executive officer and non-employee director compensation.

Pearl Meyer reports directly to the Compensation Committee and works collaboratively, as directed by the Chair of the committee, with management. In 2019, the committee concluded that Pearl Meyer was independent with respect to the services it provided because (i) it reported directly to the committee, (ii) the committee could solicit advice and consultation from it without management’s direct involvement, and (iii) all of the services provided by it in 2019 were at the request of the committee. In addition, the Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Pearl Meyer from independently advising the committee.

The Compensation Committee has established a process to limit potential conflicts of interest should management desire to seek advice from Pearl Meyer for non-executive compensation matters. Specifically, the committee determined that if management desires to use Pearl Meyer to provide any advice on non-executive compensation matters, it must contact the committee Chair and inform him or her of such request. The committee delegated to the Chair the authority to make a decision as to whether the service is appropriate. The Chair is required to inform the committee of any such request or approval granted no later than at the next scheduled committee meeting. No less than annually Pearl Meyer must provide a summary to the committee describing any non-executive compensation services provided to the company or management. No such services were provided in 2019.

Additional information about Pearl Meyer’s role is set forth below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Compensation Determination Process.”

Governance Committee

Our Governance Committee is comprised of Carol S. Eicher (Chair), Azita Arvani, Maria C. Green, Donal L. Mulligan, Steven A. Sonnenberg and David Windley.

The Governance Committee is required to meet at least two times throughout the year. In 2019, the Governance Committee met on three occasions. The primary purpose of the Governance Committee is to:

·assist the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board members;

·determine the composition of the Board and its committees;

·develop and maintain criteria and procedures for the identification and recruitment of candidates for election to serve as directors;

·lead the Board in its annual performance review and coordinate its self-evaluation process;

·regularly review and, when applicable, recommend to the Board changes to the Corporate Governance Principles, Business Ethics Guide, Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws of the company and certain Board committee charters; and

·assist the Board in understanding and complying with new corporate governance laws, regulations and policies affecting us or our business.

Executive Committee

Our Executive Committee is comprised of the independent Board members. Mr. Sonnenberg, as Chair of the Executive Committee and Lead Director, presides at the Executive Committee meetings.

17

The Executive Committee is to meet no less than four times throughout the year and in 2019 met on four occasions at either the beginning or the end of each Board meeting.

The primary purpose of the Executive Committee is to review such matters and take such actions as are appropriate to be reviewed or taken by the independent directors, including, among other things, overseeing the annual CEO evaluation process, reviewing and approving our management succession plan, and overseeing our long-term strategic direction. Any meeting of the Executive Committee held at the beginning of a regularly scheduled Board meeting generally is used to discuss the Board’s priorities and focus on the agenda topics for that meeting. Any meeting of the Executive Committee held following a regularly scheduled Board meeting is generally used to, among other things, assess the quality of the meetings and to collect feedback for the Lead Director to present to the CEO and management. Such feedback includes any requests for specific information relating to our long-term strategic direction, the annual CEO performance review, the compensation of our CEO, our management succession plan, the risks and opportunities inherent in our strategic decision making, future agenda items, and other materials.

BOARD AND COMMITTEE SELF-EVALUATION PROCESS

The Board and its committees generally conduct an annual performance evaluation as follows: annually in October, Board members complete a detailed questionnaire which asks for quantitative ratings and subjective comments in key areas covering Board and committee matters. Responses are collected by the General Counsel and a compilation of all the responses is provided to the Governance Committee. In addition, management prepares a response memorandum to the Chair of the Governance Committee. Upon review by the Governance Committee, the compilation of responses and management’s response memorandum are provided to the Board and each committee for review and discussion. Each committee thereafter provides an evaluation summary to the Board. Feedback is then provided to management through the Lead Director.

In addition, Board members periodically conduct an evaluation of their peer directors. Feedback is provided directly to the Lead Director, who then communicates to the individual directors the information gathered from this process. This peer process was last completed in early 2019.

BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEMBER NOMINATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS

Committee Appointments

Our Board appoints members of its committees at least annually upon recommendation of the Governance Committee after taking into account the desires, experiences and expertise of individual directors, the recommendations of our CEO and the benefits of rotating committee membership.

Director Nomination Process

Our Governance Committee is responsible for recommending nominees for election to the Board. As required by the Corporate Governance Principles, the Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board, on an annual basis, the requisite skills and characteristics of individual members. The committee must also balance the composition of the Board, as a whole, with the needs of the company.

Our Governance Committee reviews all director nominees and recommends to the Board those persons whose attributes it believes are most beneficial to the company. The committee’s assessment of each director nominee takes into consideration the needs of the Board, the ability to effectively represent the shareholders and stakeholders generally, as well as the following attributes:

·Experience	·Diversity
·Expertise	·Skills (including interpersonal)
·Integrity	·Dedication
·Competence

The Board does not have a written policy regarding consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. However, as indicated above, diversity is one of the factors that the Board takes into consideration when assessing director nominees. In that regard, the Board defines “diversity” broadly to include race, gender, national origin, functional experience, geographic representation and personal skills and attributes.

18

The Board looks for candidates who have public company experience, have a history of demonstrating strong and ethical leadership, are sufficiently senior and adept at understanding and evaluating strategic, financial, operational and global risks, and have the expertise to create a well-rounded Board. The Governance Committee also considers the Corporate Governance Principles, which include the following factors when considering director nominees:

·The size of the Board	·Other board service
·Directors with job changes	·Retirement
·Director terms	·Independence

Once a recommendation is made by the Governance Committee, it is reviewed by the Board. In making its decision to nominate directors, the Board considers all of the above factors.

Shareholder Nominations

The Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders. Shareholder recommendations must be accompanied by a sufficiently detailed description of the candidate’s background and qualifications. The committee will evaluate the candidate using the aforementioned criteria. To recommend a qualified candidate, shareholders should write to the Chair of the Governance Committee at the address listed below.

If a shareholder wishes to nominate a director, under our Restated Articles of Incorporation, a shareholder of record must submit to the Corporate Secretary a written request that a person’s name be placed in nomination. This request must be received not less than 75 days prior to the date fixed for our annual meeting, along with the written consent of the proposed nominee to serve as a director.

COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

All interested parties, including shareholders, may communicate with the independent members of the Board by writing to our Lead Director at:

ATTN: General Counsel, Mail Drop #29

Tennant Company

701 North Lilac Drive

P. O. Box 1452

Minneapolis, MN 55440-1452

All communications will be delivered to the General Counsel who will forward communications to our Lead Director to address the matter.

COMMITTEE CHARTERS AND OTHER GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

All four standing Committee Charters, as well as other governance documents, including the Corporate Governance Principles and Business Ethics Guide, are available on our website at http://www.tennantco.com. To access these documents click on “Investors” at the bottom of our home page, then “Governance” and then “Governance Documents.” Our report on our sustainability initiatives can also be found by clicking on “Sustainability” at the bottom of our home page.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our non-employee director compensation program is designed to be competitive and to align the interests of our non-employee directors with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Our director compensation program is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee using external data derived from our outside compensation consultant’s review of proxy data used in the executive compensation determination process. Our directors are compensated for their services at the start of each Board Year. We define “Board Year” for director compensation purposes as the time between annual shareholder meetings.

19

Director Compensation for 2019

In December 2018, consistent with its annual review of non-employee director pay, the Compensation Committee requested that its independent compensation consultant review the competitiveness of the current pay program to determine whether changes should be considered for 2019. Pearl Meyer analyzed the market competitiveness of our non-employee director pay program, including all role-based retainers and fees, and reviewed each element of the pay program against our comparator group and, as a secondary reference point, against all industry survey data. Based on this analysis and the compensation consultant’s recommendations, in February 2019 the Compensation Committee and the Board approved changes to certain elements of the non-employee director pay package for the 2019 Board Year. The 2019 Board Year compensation, including such changes, was as follows:

Component of Pay	Board Year Compensation
Annual Board Retainer	$65,000 (up from $55,000 in 2018)
Annual Committee Member Retainer	Audit: $15,000
	Compensation: $6,000
	Governance: $5,000
Annual Additional Committee Chair Retainer	Audit: $10,000
	Compensation: $10,000
	Governance: $5,000
Annual Lead Director Retainer	$60,000 (up from $20,000 in 2018)
Annual Equity Grant	$110,000 (up from $100,000 in 2018) aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units

The increase in the annual Lead Director retainer was also based on our Lead Director’s more expansive duties in comparison to the lead directors in the comparator group.

Retainer fees are paid in cash or non-employee directors may elect to defer the retainer fees under the Tennant Company Executive Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. For additional information on this plan, see the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation discussion under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Plans and Agreements—Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation).” All compensation paid to directors who join the Board between annual shareholder meetings is pro-rated for partial years of service.

Non-employee directors receive annual grants of restricted stock units under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan having an aggregate fair value of $110,000, subject to rounding adjustments described below. The number of restricted stock units granted is determined by dividing $110,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, rounded to the nearest share. The restricted stock units vest one year from the date of grant and convert into an equal number of shares of our common stock. A director may defer receipt of the shares until his or her service as a director ends or until a pre-established date set forth in the irrevocable deferral election form applicable to the award. Dividend equivalents on outstanding restricted stock units are accrued at the same rate that dividends are paid to our shareholders, are subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying units and are paid in cash at the same time as the underlying units are settled.

20

The table below summarizes compensation paid to each person who served as a non-employee director during fiscal 2019. Ms. Green joined the Board on March 15, 2019.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)1	Stock Awards ($)2	Total ($)
Azita Arvani	76,000	110,008	186,008
William F. Austen	86,000	110,008	196,008
Carol S. Eicher	81,000	110,008	191,008
Maria C. Green3	78,712	124,524	203,236
Donal L. Mulligan	95,000	110,008	205,008
Steven A. Sonnenberg	145,000	110,008	255,008
David S. Wichmann	86,000	110,008	196,008
David Windley	86,000	110,008	196,008

____________________

1Includes annual retainer fees as well as pro-rated retainer fees paid in cash or deferred.

2The valuation of stock awards is calculated using the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Footnote 18 “Share-Based Compensation” to our financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, for the assumptions used in such valuation. The following table summarizes the aggregate number of restricted shares, restricted stock units and options held by each non-employee director as of December 31, 2019.

Name	Restricted Shares (#)a	Restricted Stock Units (#)	Stock Options (#)b
Azita Arvani	4,712	1,679	14,406
William F. Austen	11,544	1,679	17,276
Carol S. Eicher	9,263	1,679	17,276
Maria C. Green	—	1,910	—
Donal L. Mulligan	7,262	1,679	15,526
Steven A. Sonnenberg	13,457	1,679	12,995
David S. Wichmann	7,754	1,679	17,276
David Windley	1,780	1,679	7,259

____________________

aReflects restricted shares granted to non-employee directors prior to the 2018 Board year which vest upon the director’s termination of service on the Board.

bReflects stock options granted to non-employee directors prior to the 2018 Board year which vest pro rata over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

3The amounts for Ms. Green include pro-rated compensation for the 2018 Board Year and full compensation for the 2019 Board Year compensation.

Stock Ownership Goal for Non-Employee Directors

The Board has adopted a stock ownership goal for non-employee directors of five times their annual cash retainer, to be attained within five years from the date of election to the Board. Progress toward the ownership goal is measured each year at the time of the February Compensation Committee meeting. Ownership levels are calculated by adding (i) the value of the shares held directly by the director, (ii) the estimated after-tax value of restricted and unrestricted shares, and (iii) the potential gains from vested options, as of the close of market on December 31 of the year immediately preceding the year of calculation. Directors who have served on the Board for five years or more have achieved their goals. Newer Board members are on pace for achieving their ownership targets within the five-year period.

21

ITEM 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that the Board will be divided into three classes of directors of as nearly equal size as possible, and the term of each class of directors is three years. Currently, we have nine directors with three directors serving in each class. At the Annual Meeting, three Class I directors are to be elected for three-year terms. If elected, each will serve until their terms expire at the time of the Annual Meeting in 2023 and until their successors are elected and have qualified. Each nominee has expressed his or her willingness to serve. In the event that any of the nominees is not a candidate at the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the named proxies to vote in favor of the remaining named nominees and to vote for a substitute nominee selected by the Governance Committee.

The Board, upon recommendation of the Governance Committee, has designated Carol S. Eicher, Maria C. Green and Donal L. Mulligan as nominees for election as Class I directors at the Annual Meeting to serve three-year terms expiring in 2023. All nominees currently serve on our Board and were elected by shareholders at our 2017 Annual Meeting, except for Maria C. Green who was elected at the 2019 Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Governance Committee, unanimously recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees.

22

AUDIT COMMITTEE AND INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM INFORMATION

FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The following table represents fees for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, certain audit-related services, tax services and all other fees paid to KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Description of Fees	2019 Amount ($)	2018 Amount ($)
Audit Fees1	2,467,000	2,666,000
Audit-Related Fees	—	—
Tax Fees2	365,000	541,000
All Other Fees	—	—
Total	2,832,000	3,207,000

____________________

1Audit Fees for 2019 and 2018 include professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements, including quarterly reviews, statutory audits of certain of our international subsidiaries and the audit of internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2Tax Fees for 2019 and 2018 consisted primarily of international tax compliance and consulting services. The Audit Committee has adopted a Pre-Approval Policy for Non-Audit Services, which appears on our website as an exhibit to the Audit Committee charter. All audit-related, tax and other non-audit services were performed in compliance with the Pre-Approval Policy. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the above non-audit services did not impact KPMG’s independence.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of KPMG. The Audit Committee and the Board believe the retention of KPMG for 2019 is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.

The Audit Committee’s meetings are designed to facilitate and encourage private communication between the committee and KPMG. In addition, the committee complied with its charter responsibilities and reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with management. The Audit Committee discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission. KPMG also provided to the committee the written disclosures required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding independence, and the committee discussed with KPMG the firm’s independence.

Based upon the committee’s discussion with management and KPMG and the committee’s review of audited consolidated financial statements and the report of KPMG to the committee, the committee recommended that the Board include our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Members of Audit Committee
Donal L. Mulligan (Chair)	William F. Austen
Steven A. Sonnenberg	David S. Wichmann

23

CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Previous Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

In 2019, the Audit Committee conducted a competitive process to determine our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020. The company invited several independent registered public accounting firms to participate in this process.

As a result of the review of proposals from the independent registered public accounting firms that participated, on August 27, 2019, the Audit Committee approved the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, subject to the completion of Deloitte’s standard client acceptance procedures and execution of an engagement letter.  KPMG continued as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2019, and was dismissed on February 27, 2020, but will continue to provide statutory audit services related to the 2019 fiscal year, until complete.

KPMG’s reports on the consolidated financial statements of the company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except as follows:

KPMG’s report on our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, contained a separate paragraph stating that “As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for revenue in 2018 due to the adoption of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Topic 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers.”

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and the subsequent interim period through February 27, 2020, there were (i) no disagreements as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, between us and KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG, would have caused KPMG to make reference thereto in their reports; and (ii) no reportable events as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

New Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

During the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and the subsequent interim period through February 27, 2020, neither the company nor anyone acting on our behalf has consulted with Deloitte regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to us that Deloitte concluded was an important factor considered by us in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, or (ii) any matters that were the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions, or (iii) any reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 2—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote on the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020.

Deloitte is an independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of Deloitte and believes that the retention of Deloitte is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.

We have been advised that representatives from Deloitte and KPMG will be present during the Annual Meeting. The representatives will be available to respond to appropriate questions and will be given the opportunity to make a statement if the firm so desires.

The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, unanimously recommends a vote FOR ratification of Deloitte as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

24

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This compensation discussion and analysis (“CD&A”) explains our executive compensation program and describes the process followed by the Compensation Committee for making pay and benefit decisions, as well as its rationale for specific decisions made in 2019. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and footnote disclosure setting forth the compensation of the following executive officers (referred to as the “Named Executives”):

·H. Chris Killingstad, President and Chief Executive Officer

·Keith A. Woodward, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

·Richard H. Zay, Senior Vice President, Americas and Global R&D

·David W. Huml, Senior Vice President, EMEA, APAC, Global Marketing and Operations

·Mary E. Talbott, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Executive Summary

Overview of 2019 Performance

2019 was a year of positive transition for us as we executed upon our new corporate strategic plan. We are moving from a period of strategic expansion, designed to extend and diversify our geographic and addressable-market footprint, to a much more concentrated and deliberate focus on unlocking the benefits of this broader platform and driving profitable growth. This concentration on profitable growth and, specifically, raising our EBITDA margin profile, forms the center of the strategic plan, and for this reason EBITDA was added as a key metric in our 2019 cash incentive plan.

We saw measured year-over-year organic sales growth of 2.2% in 2019, as compared to recent year-end results. This growth was driven by the Americas region, which experienced organic growth of 5.6% during 2019. The strength in North America was driven by strong demand for Tennant’s autonomous cleaning machine and growth in service and parts and consumables. Latin America also had strong broad-based growth across the region. The EMEA region had an organic decline of 3.8% from broad-based weakness in the European market. The APAC region also experienced a decline in 2019, with organic sales declining 1.7%, primarily due to weakness in China, which more than offset growth in all other APAC markets. Our profitability enhancement initiatives combined to deliver significant EBITDA expansion in 2019, with adjusted EBITDA dollars growth of 13.3% and adjusted EBITDA margin growth of 120 basis points. The robust growth in adjusted EBITDA primarily resulted from a significant improvement in gross margins, driven by pricing actions and cost-reduction efforts, which more than offset the negative effect of material and labor expense inflation and higher tariffs. In addition, we continued to tightly manage controllable expenses, which also contributed to the adjusted EBITDA expansion.

Snapshot of 2019 Compensation Decisions

Based on our performance and consistent with the design of our program, the Compensation Committee made the following executive compensation decisions for fiscal 2019:

·Base salary: Approved merit-based salary increases ranging from 3% to 3.5%.

·2019 Executive Officer Cash Incentive Plan (“CIP”): Achievement of financial and strategic objectives resulted in an overall payout percentage of 152.4% of target.

·2019-2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards: Named Executives received 20% of their grant in restricted stock, 40% in stock options and 40% in performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”).

·2017-2019 PRSU Awards: Achievement of financial and strategic objectives resulted in an overall payout of 91.9% of target.

25

The Compensation Committee believes that the design and structure of the company’s incentive program, and the decisions it makes, provides a direct link between company performance and pay outcomes for the executives, as described in greater detail below.

Role of the Committee in the Compensation Process

The Compensation Committee ensures that executive compensation and benefit programs are consistent with our compensation philosophy and other corporate goals and makes decisions regarding Total Direct Compensation (i.e., base salary and short-term and long-term variable pay), other benefits and perquisites for Named Executives, and, subject to final approval from the Executive Committee, the compensation of our CEO.

Compensation Determination Process

The Compensation Committee typically meets four times a year to consider various aspects of compensation for the Named Executives and non-employee directors. Among other things, it decides how to allocate each Named Executive’s Total Direct Compensation and determines the target level of Total Direct Compensation for each. The committee sets Total Direct Compensation and the allocation between each element so that it is consistent with our compensation objectives.

While we do not target any specific mix of compensation, we generally aim to have a compensation program that is in line with benchmarked companies and survey data. In addition, we aim to appropriately balance (i) fixed versus variable compensation, (ii) short- versus long-term compensation, (iii) company versus individual performance, and (iv) shareholder, financial, operational and strategic goals. The balance and mix of incentive compensation are reviewed and determined each year based on short- and long-term objectives of the business.

Annually in December, the Compensation Committee conducts a comprehensive review of pay levels for our Named Executives. The Compensation Committee sets the Named Executives’ Total Direct Compensation opportunity at its annual February meeting. As part of the review, the committee receives proxy peer data and other external reference data in the form of published executive compensation surveys from Pearl Meyer.

In setting compensation for 2019, the Compensation Committee reviewed data and information from a group of comparatively similar companies and executive compensation surveys to identify competitive market compensation practices and our overall competitive position. The committee works with Pearl Meyer to review the set of comparator firms (the “comparator group”) and to identify and use appropriate executive compensation survey sources against which we assess the competitiveness of executive pay levels.

In addition, the committee considers internal data, including each executive officer’s performance, experience, management capabilities and contributions to our operations, and the tactical and strategic value of specific skill sets of certain key executives. When assessing the compensation of our CEO, the Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee evaluate our financial performance against that of peer companies and our CEO’s performance against the company’s financial performance goals and strategic initiatives.

In connection with the processes outlined above, for 2019, Ms. McKnight, our Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, provided input on the job scope of each executive officer and facilitated the gathering of the market data used by Pearl Meyer. Pearl Meyer conducted the analysis, reviewed the information in advance with the Chair of the Compensation Committee and reviewed management’s compensation recommendations with the committee. Ms. McKnight was available for questions at the committee meeting when the compensation of the executive officers, except for our CEO, was discussed, but played no role in determining her own compensation. Pearl Meyer independently met alone with the committee, without the presence of members of management, when the compensation of our CEO was discussed.

Comparator Group

The comparator group is used for benchmarking Total Direct Compensation for Named Executives and for non-employee director compensation. The selection methodology for reviewing and determining the comparator group has generally included: industry, size, market capitalization, revenue, geographic product mix and customer segmentation, and aggregate similarity to our company.

26

The committee reviews the comparator group every year to ensure each company remains appropriate for compensation comparison purposes and reflects our size and scope of business. In addition, the committee reviews and validates the selection criteria every year to ensure it aligns with our business strategies.

In April 2019, the Compensation Committee, working with Pearl Meyer, conducted its regular review of the comparator group for 2019 and determined that no changes to the peer group from the prior year would be made. The 19 companies that made up our 2019 comparator group at the time the committee established 2019 Named Executive and non-employee director compensation are listed below. The Compensation Committee selected these companies because they were similar in scope and size, with revenues between $379 million and $2,538 million and market cap between $591 million and $7,904 million.

Actuant Corporation (n/k/a Enerpac Tool Group)	Federal Signal Corporation
Altra Industrial Motion Corp.	Gorman-Rupp Company
Alamo Group Inc.	Graco Inc.
Barnes Group Inc.	Nordson Corporation
Briggs & Stratton Corporation	Standex International Corporation
Chart Industries, Inc.	The Middleby Corporation
CIRCOR International, Inc.	The Toro Company
Columbus McKinnon Corporation	Tredegar Corporation
Donaldson Company, Inc.	Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Esco Technologies Inc.

Compensation Governance

We believe the following practices and policies promote sound compensation governance and are in the best interests of our shareholders and Named Executives:

What We Do:

·place a heavy emphasis on performance-based compensation, using a combination of short- and long-term incentives, to ensure a strong connection between our operating performance and actual compensation;

·maintain multi-year vesting requirements for equity compensation awards;

·provide 100% of long-term incentives in the form of equity;

·enforce rigorous stock ownership guidelines;

·maintain a compensation recoupment (claw-back) policy;

·maintain a fully independent Compensation Committee;

·retain an independent compensation consultant;

·annually review risks associated with compensation; and

·provide shareholders an annual opportunity to cast a say-on-pay vote.

What We Don’t Do:

·provide gross-up payments to cover excise taxes for executive or severance benefits;

·provide excessive or special perquisites;

·option backdating or repricing;

·provide grants of reload stock options; or

27

·allow hedging or pledging of Tennant securities by executive officers.

2019 Say-On-Pay

Each year, we carefully consider the results of our shareholder say-on-pay vote from the preceding year. In 2019, approximately 98% of the votes cast supported our executive compensation decisions. Overall, we believe our shareholders are highly supportive of our executive compensation program and its direction. As a result, in 2019, we did not make significant changes to the structure of our program. We will continue to keep an open dialogue with our shareholders to help ensure that we have a regular pulse on investor perspectives.

What Guides Our Program

Compensation Objectives

Our overall objective is to align executive compensation with our short- and long-term operating goals and the interests of our shareholders.

We seek to offer a comprehensive compensation package that is competitive with those of similarly sized U.S. durable goods manufacturing companies. Our compensation programs take into account that an executive’s actual compensation level may be greater or less than average competitive levels based on our annual and long-term financial performance against pre-established goals, the individual’s performance and the individual’s scope of responsibilities.

Specifically, our compensation programs adhere to the following design philosophy and principles:

·create a relationship between pay and performance by providing a strong link between our short- and long-term business goals and executive compensation;

·attract and retain high-caliber key executive officers who can create long-term financial success for the company and enhance shareholder return;

·motivate executive officers to achieve our goals by placing a significant portion of pay at risk;

·align the interests of executive officers with those of our shareholders by providing a significant portion of compensation in stock-based awards; and

·discourage risk-taking behavior that would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Linking Pay and Performance

A key component of our executive compensation philosophy is the link between compensation and overall business results and shareholder value creation. We strive to clearly communicate this to our shareholders and believe that looking at realizable pay relative to our peers (see “Comparator Group” above) can illustrate this point effectively.

The Compensation Committee works closely with its outside consultant, Pearl Meyer, to evaluate our compensation programs and ensure adherence to our compensation philosophy. During 2019, Pearl Meyer assessed the relationship between total realizable pay (as defined below) and our Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) for the three-year period ended December 31, 2018. This approach uses the most recent period coinciding with our fiscal year-end for which corresponding peer group compensation data is also available. The analysis looks at the degree of alignment between total compensation delivered to Named Executives during the review period and our performance relative to our peer group. “Total realizable pay” is defined as the sum of the following components:

·Actual base salaries paid over the three-year period;

·Actual short-term incentive awards paid for the three-year period;

·The Black-Scholes value as of December 31, 2018, of any stock options granted over the three-year period;

·The value as of December 31, 2018, of restricted shares granted over the three-year period; and

28

·The value as of December 31, 2018, of PRSUs earned for cycles ending in 2016, 2017 and 2018.

For peer companies, realizable pay also includes cash-based long-term incentive plan payouts for cycles that ended within the three-year review period.

As illustrated in the chart below, realizable pay for our CEO and other Named Executives was generally aligned with our relative TSR performance against peers. Realizable pay for the three-year period for our CEO and other Named Executives approximated the 20th to 30th percentile. Our TSR over the same period of time is near the 20th percentile.

29

Direct Compensation Elements

We seek to achieve our objectives using the following compensation elements:

Element	Type	Terms
Cash	Base Salary	Fixed pay element that reflects the value of the executive role. Generally eligible for increase annually, depending on market conditions, performance and internal equity.
	Short-Term Cash Incentive Plan (“CIP”)	Focuses on achievement of annual goals that are directly linked to execution of the company’s annual operating plan and calibrated to deliver performance-aligned pay.
Long-Term Incentive Plan or “LTIP” (100% Equity)		The LTIP program focuses on: (1) direct linkage to stock price performance; (2) key financial drivers of shareholder value; and (3) supporting leadership retention objectives and facilitating and encouraging executive retention and stock ownership through the grant of stock options, performance-based restricted stock units, and restricted stock with opportunities calibrated to deliver pay aligned with performance.
	Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units or PRSUs	The performance period for PRSUs is three years. Payment is variable based on the relative achievement of pre-set financial goals. PRSUs are settled in shares of our common stock on settlement.
	Stock Options	Stock options generally vest in equal installments over three years from the grant date and have a ten-year term.
	Restricted Stock	Restricted stock generally vests three years from the grant date. Dividends are accumulated on restricted stock during the vesting period and paid in cash upon vesting.
Other Equity	Restricted Stock Units (used for one-time grants outside of LTIP program)	RSUs generally vest two or three years from the grant date. RSUs are paid in shares of our common stock on settlement.

Total Direct Compensation: Pay Mix

Our compensation strategy is to target compensation levels within a competitive range of the comparator group at approximately the 50th percentile in base salary and between the 50th and 75th percentile for short-term and long-term incentives, positioning Total Direct Compensation between the 50th and 75th percentile. The Compensation Committee believes that this strategy provides sufficient short-term compensation to attract and retain competitive talent, but also places a large portion of pay in the form of equity and performance-based pay at risk to drive long-term performance.

30

Based on the Compensation Committee’s pay decisions, the charts below show the target Total Direct Compensation that Mr. Killingstad and other Named Executives received in fiscal 2019. These charts illustrate that a majority of Mr. Killingstad’s Total Direct Compensation (approximately 81%) is variable and at risk, and an average of 66% of Total Direct Compensation for our other Named Executives is variable and at risk, based on our performance.

Key Compensation Decisions for 2019

Base Salary

Base salaries and incentive targets for Named Executives are reviewed annually to ensure that they remain competitive and reflect the scope and responsibility of their positions. In making base salary and incentive target decisions, the Compensation Committee considers benchmarking data provided by Pearl Meyer, our CEO’s recommendations, current base salary, scope and complexity of the position, experience, individual performance and internal pay equity.

For 2019, the Compensation Committee approved merit-based salary increases for the Named Executives ranging from 3.0% to 3.5%.

	Base Salary
	2018($)	2019($)	% Increase
H. Chris Killingstad	772,719	800,000	3.5%
Keith A. Woodward1	435,000	435,000	0.0%
Richard H. Zay	383,374	394,875	3.0%
David W. Huml	361,877	372,733	3.0%
Mary E. Talbott2	-	345,000	-

____________________

1Because Mr. Woodward’s employment with the Company began in December 2018 and his base salary was determined at that time, he did not receive a merit increase in 2019.

2Ms. Talbott was not employed by the Company in 2018.

Incentive Targets

Executive Officer Cash Incentive Plan (“CIP”)

For 2019, the Compensation Committee adopted the CIP under which executive officers and other members of the management team of the Company are eligible to receive cash incentive awards. The CIP replaces the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “STIP”) with respect to cash incentive awards made on or after January 2, 2019. The CIP is substantially similar to the STIP, except that it removes certain references and requirements previously applicable to qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code following the repeal of the Section 162(m) exemption under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The CIP also provides that cash incentive awards may be made with respect to a performance period that is longer or shorter than one fiscal year.

31

The committee did not make any adjustments to incentive targets for 2019.

	Incentive Targets as a % of Base Salary
	STIP/CIP		LTIP
	2018	2019	2018	2019
H. Chris Killingstad	120%	120%	320%	320%
Keith Woodward1	-	60%	-	150%
Richard H. Zay	60%	60%	145%	145%
David W. Huml	60%	60%	145%	145%
Mary E. Talbott1	-	55%	-	120%

____________________

1Mr. Woodward was not eligible for the 2018 STIP and LTIP, as his employment with the Company commenced on December 1, 2018. Ms. Talbott was not employed by the Company in 2018.

Incentive Compensation Metrics

Our incentive compensation plans are designed to reward Named Executives for achievement against key financial performance metrics. Each of the metrics used in our executive compensation program is defined below:

Performance Metrics	How It Is Determined/Defined	Where It is Used
Adjusted Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization in dollars (“Adjusted EBITDA$”)	Reported net sales minus operating expenses, which includes the cost of sales, research and development expenses and selling and administrative expenses but excludes depreciation and amortization expense, and excludes certain extraordinary and non-operational items, if any, as reported by the Company	2019 CIP
Adjusted Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net sales (“Adjusted EBITDA%”)	Adjusted EBITDA$divided by net sales	2019 CIP
Total Revenue	Reported annual net sales including the impact of foreign currency and divestitures and acquisitions	2019 CIP
Incentive Return on Invested Capital (“Incentive ROIC”)	3-year average of incentive operating profit (net sales minus operating expenses, which includes the cost of sales, research and development expenses and selling and administrative expenses) divided by (total assets – cash – short-term investments) – (total liabilities – debt)	2017-2019 LTIP 2018-2020 LTIP 2019-2021 LTIP
Organic Revenue	3-year sum of reported annual net sales excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange and divestitures and acquisitions, when applicable, for each of the three years in the performance period, divided by three	2017-2019 LTIP
Incentive Cumulative Earnings Per Share	3-year sum of adjusted net earnings divided by weighted average shares outstanding	2018-2020 LTIP 2019-2021 LTIP

The Compensation Committee approved the use of Adjusted EBITDA$ and Adjusted EBITDA% as financial metrics for the fiscal 2019 CIP, in addition to Total Revenue, because it believes that these metrics are more relevant to assess the performance of the business with respect to creation of shareholder value than the previous STIP financial metrics of Incentive OP$ and Incentive OP%.

As used in the above metrics, EBITDA$ and net earnings used in the calculation of Incentive Cumulative Earnings Per Share are adjusted and calculated as reported by the Company in the earnings releases for the applicable period. With respect to all plan metrics set forth in the above chart, the Compensation Committee has authority to interpret our incentive

32

plans, adjust business results and take other actions in its sole discretion to assure that the plans operate consistently with the compensation goals. The plans were designed such that when calculating the metric achievement, the committee has the authority to adjust results for non-operating and other extraordinary items. For 2019, the Committee exercised discretion to adjust the 2017-2019 PRSU metric achievement for acquisitions/divestitures and currency adjustments.

Achievement of 2019 CIP

To drive achievement of our growth and financial performance goals, our 2019 CIP metrics were Adjusted EBITDA$, Adjusted EBITDA%, and Total Revenue. In 2019, based on the company’s financial performance against these metrics, the payout level was 152.4% of target.

Performance Measure	Weighting	Threshold	Target	Maximum	2019 Actual
Adjusted EBITDA$ (in thousands)	50%	$121,108	$130,716	$139,379	$136,753
Adjusted EBITDA%	25%	10.80%	11.30%	11.90%	12.02%
Total Revenue ($ in thousands)	25%	$1,126,192	$1,154,918	$1,183,946	$1,137,637
Payout Level (% of Target Payout)		50%	100%	200%	152.4%

For the 2019 CIP, all of the Named Executives targets were weighted 100% on Company financial results representing the Compensation Committee’s belief that all Named Executives should be driving and accountable for the overall performance of the Company at an enterprise level.

2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan Structure

In February 2019, the Compensation Committee approved our 2019 LTIP structure for our Named Executives in the following mix which was the same as our 2018 LTIP structure:

·40% PRSUs that vest at the end of the 2019-2021 period based on the performance metrics described below;

·40% non-qualified stock options vesting ratably over three years; and

·20% restricted stock that cliff vests at the end of three years.

As approved by the Compensation Committee, the 2019-2021 PRSU grants are earned based on Incentive ROIC (weighting of 60%) and Incentive Cumulative Earnings Per Share (weighting of 40%). The Incentive ROIC metric is important as it measures the return generated from capital invested and holds us accountable for both profitability and effective use of our balance sheet. We use Incentive Cumulative Earnings Per Share as a metric because of its bottom-line focus on profitability, its multiple levers to drive performance over multi-year periods and because it is a key measure to our investors. Earnings Per Share is also the most prevalent metric used by our peers in their performance-based long-term incentive programs.

Performance at the threshold level earns a payout equal to 50% of target, while performance at the maximum level earns a payout equal to 200% of target. The performance targets are confidential and competitive information, particularly to the extent they relate to projected company financial data, which the company does not publicly disclose. The Compensation Committee believes that targeted levels of performance for the LTIP grants are challenging and will not be achieved all the time. The Compensation Committee sets the LTIP financial performance target at a level that would make it reasonably difficult to achieve, when considering the business environment at the time the target was established. Under our LTIP methodology, financial performance is assessed in relation to the Company’s annual operating plan and budgeted invested capital.

For more information regarding the specific grants made to Named Executives under the 2019-2021 LTIP, see the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.

Achievement of 2017-2019 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

In February 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the 2017-2019 LTIP for the Named Executives in the following mix:

33

·40% PRSUs that vest at the end of the 2017-2019 period based on the performance metrics described below;

·40% non-qualified stock options vesting ratably over three years; and

·20% restricted stock that cliff vests at the end of three years.

The metrics approved for the 2017-2019 LTIP were Incentive ROIC (weighted 75%) and a three-year simple average of Organic Revenue (weighted 25%).  Based on the Company’s performance against these measures, the payout level was 91.9% of target.

Performance Measure	Weighting	Threshold	Target	Maximum	2019 Actual
2017-2019 Incentive ROIC (12-month average/3-year simple average)	75%	25.5%	27.5%	31.5%	26.5%
2017-2019 Organic Revenue (3-year simple average)	25%	$812M	$829M	$951M	$865.5M
Payout Level (% of Target Payout)		50%	100%	200%	91.9%

2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan Structure

As we did not make any changes for 2019, our 2018 Long-term Incentive Plan structure is the same as of our 2019 LTIP structure:

·40% PRSUs that vest at the end of the 2018-2020 period based on the performance metrics described below;

·40% non-qualified stock options vesting ratably over three years; and

·20% restricted stock that cliff vests at the end of three years.

PRSUs will be settled at the end of the 2018-2020 cycle based on our performance against goals that were set at the beginning of the cycle. As with the 2019 PRSU grants, the 2018 PRSUs granted are earned on the basis of our performance on Incentive ROIC (weighting of 60%) and Incentive Cumulative Earnings Per Share (weighting of 40%).

2020 Long-Term Incentive Plan Structure

For 2020, our Compensation Committee has changed the equity award mix. As shown in the table below, we have adjusted our equity award mix such that 50% of each Named Executive’s LTIP opportunity is delivered in PRSUs.

	Equity Award Mix
	2019	2020
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units	40%	50%
Stock Options	40%	25%
Restricted Stock	20%	25%

The change to our equity award mix was made for several reasons:

·To better align our compensation program with our business objective and reinforce our executive retention objectives

·To increase the sensitivity of our financial performance to the compensation and rewards earned by our senior executives

·To manage the dilution of shareholder interests from the granting of equity awards

34

For the 2020-2022 PRSU grants, the Committee did not make any changes to the metrics or weights for the PRSU grants and PRSUs will continue to be earned on the basis of our performance on Incentive ROIC (weighting of 60%) and Incentive Cumulative Earnings Per Share (weighting of 40%).

Other Plans and Agreements

Named Executives may also receive payments through various other agreements and the plans described below or in the event of special circumstances. These agreements and plans are typically required in the competitive environment to attract and retain talent.

Sign-on and Recognition Awards

From time to time, the Compensation Committee may determine that it is appropriate to provide for certain sign-on compensation in order to attract an executive to leave his or her current employment and join the Company.  In 2019, the Compensation Committee approved certain sign-on compensation for Ms. Talbott in connection with her commencement of employment and relocation.  The Committee granted her a cash sign-on bonus in the amount of $150,000 that was subject to repayment, on a pro-rated basis, if Ms. Talbott resigned within the first year, and a restricted stock unit with a grant date fair value of $200,000 that vests in full on the third anniversary of the date of grant. In addition, the Committee approved the reimbursement of certain of Ms. Talbott’s relocation expenses, subject to the company’s relocation program, which reimbursement was subject to repayment if Ms. Talbott resigned within the first year.

In addition, the Compensation Committee may determine that it is appropriate to make certain awards designed to recognize and retain executives. In 2019, the Compensation Committee approved a one-time cash bonus payment in the amount of $125,000 to Mr. Huml to recognize additional responsibilities he assumed related to management of the Company’s global operations function for nearly two years after the prior incumbent left the company. The payment was made in recognition of both the significant personal investment and the results he achieved in leading these operations and creating a more efficient global supply group.

Retirement Savings Plan

Our Named Executives are generally eligible to participate in the broad-based welfare benefit programs that we sponsor, including the Tennant Company Retirement Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”). The Savings Plan is available to all eligible employees, as defined by the plan, and allows for pre-tax elective deferrals, Roth contributions and a matching contribution by us of up to 3% of eligible compensation up to $280,000. In addition, the Savings Plan allows profit sharing contributions by us based on the relevant metric set. This additional profit-sharing contribution is paid into each eligible employee’s account under the Savings Plan unless the amount exceeds 3.5% of eligible compensation, in which case 3% is paid into the eligible employee’s account and the balance of the actual calculated profit-sharing amount is paid in cash to the employee. The Adjusted EBITDA$ achieved in 2019 resulted in a profit-sharing contribution under the Savings Plan for 2019 equal to 3.70% of eligible compensation up to $280,000.

Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan (Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation)

Our Named Executives are eligible for supplemental non-qualified benefits under our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan. The intention of this plan is to provide participating individuals with benefits that would otherwise be available to them under our Savings Plan but for the application of limitations on benefits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts deferred in this plan are listed in the “Excess” column in the All Other Compensation Table which is included as a footnote to the Summary Compensation Table. In addition, this plan allows employee participants to defer the receipt of base salary and CIP payments and non-employee directors to defer receipt of annual retainers as follows:

·executive officers, including Named Executives, may elect to defer 0-25% of their base salary and 0-100% of their CIP payout; and

·non-employee directors may elect to defer 0%, 50% or 100% of their annual retainer.

The interest rate earned on deferrals in 2019 was 3.8933%.

Certain management and Named Executives may defer income on a pre-tax basis in excess of the deferral amounts allowed under our Savings Plan. Participating employees may receive discretionary company contributions under this plan in the form of excess profit sharing not available to them under the Savings Plan. In addition, participants are eligible to

35

receive matching contributions not available to them under the Savings Plan. Under the terms of this plan, matching contributions and annual profit-sharing contributions are based on formulas applicable to them in the Savings Plan but not available because of qualified plan limitations. Participants’ accounts are fully vested, at all times, except that a participant forfeits all company discretionary matching contributions and profit-sharing contributions in the event of termination for cause. Pursuant to this plan, “cause” means (i) the participant’s gross negligence, fraud, disloyalty, dishonesty or willful violation of any law or significant policy, to the extent committed in connection with the position or (ii) the participant’s failure to substantially perform (for reasons other than disability) the duties reasonably assigned or appropriate to his or her position. In each case, the participant’s behavior must have resulted in a material adverse effect on our company or an affiliate. The timing of payment of benefits attributable to amounts contributed or deferred after January 1, 2003, including company contributions and gains and losses credited thereon, varies based on the type of contribution or deferral.

Executive Employment Agreements, Management Agreements and Executive Officer Severance Plan

The Compensation Committee has determined that we should provide certain post-termination benefits to our executive officers, including the Named Executives, to obtain the benefits of their services and attention to our affairs. In exchange for the benefits we provide, the Named Executives are required to agree to certain confidentiality, non-competition and cooperation covenants, which the Compensation Committee believes are valuable when an executive’s employment terminates. In addition, the committee believes that we should provide an inducement for executive officers to remain in our service in the event of any proposed or anticipated change in control in order to facilitate an orderly transition, without placing the executive in a position where he or she is concerned about being terminated without compensation in connection with such a transaction. We also require executive officers to sign a release of their claims against us as a condition to receiving payments from us, and this release and the other covenants are more likely to be enforceable as a result of the benefits we provide under these arrangements. For these reasons, we have entered into Executive Employment Agreements and Management Agreements with the Named Executives other than Mr. Woodward and Ms. Talbott. A description of the agreements is included under “Agreements and Arrangements with Named Executives.”

Mr. Woodward and Ms. Talbott are participants in the Executive Officer Severance Plan adopted in October of 2018. The key terms governing a separation of Mr. Woodward’s or Ms. Talbott’s service are substantially the same as those covering the other Named Executives with a few key differences. A description of the plan is included under “Agreements and Arrangements with Named Executives.”

Generally, the arrangements only provide for benefits in the event the executive is terminated without cause, provided that certain benefits are also provided if the executive voluntarily terminates his or her employment for good reason under the agreements. The Compensation Committee believes that a termination by an executive for good reason may be conceptually the same as termination by us without cause. This is particularly true in the case of a change in control where a potential acquirer would otherwise have an incentive to constructively terminate the executive’s employment to avoid paying severance benefits. These arrangements are described below under “Agreements and Arrangements with Named Executives.” No cash severance becomes due merely upon a change in control, but rather only if the executive officer’s employment is terminated without cause or if the executive officer terminates for good reason following the change in control, which is often referred to as a “double trigger.”

The form and level of benefits provided under these agreements have been approved by the Compensation Committee based on historical practices and general information about the level of benefits provided by other companies with whom we compete for executive talent.

Our equity awards for all employees generally provide for acceleration of vesting, or lapse of restrictions, upon a change in control. The Compensation Committee believes that acceleration upon a change in control is appropriate to minimize the risk that executive officers might favor a particular transaction based on the likely impact on the executive officer’s equity awards, to increase the likelihood that the employees will remain with us after becoming aware of a pending or threatened change in control, and due to the increased likelihood that employees may be terminated by a successor through no fault of their own.

Compensation Policies

Recoupment Policy

We have a recoupment (or claw-back) policy. The policy is applicable to all employees designated as access persons under our insider trading policy (persons with access to detailed financial and other insider information, a group that includes all executive officers). The policy requires recoupment of certain cash and equity incentive award payouts in the

36

event we are required to restate our financial results.  The amount subject to recoupment is the amount that would not have been earned or paid based on the restated results. In all cases, any recoupment is based on net proceeds from the awards subject to recoupment and includes the proceeds from the sale of any shares subject to equity awards that are subject to recoupment, as well as any dividends paid on the shares received from an award.

The policy that was amended by our Compensation Committee in 2018 now also subjects all cash incentive and equity awards to forfeiture and/or recoupment in the event a covered person engages in certain gross misconduct.

In administering the policy, the Compensation Committee has discretion to reduce the amount of any forfeiture or recoupment and may also pursue other remedies against a covered person for conduct covered by the policy.

Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines

To align executive officers’ interests with shareholders’ interests, the Compensation Committee expects executive officers to acquire significant equity ownership. The guidelines require that within five years of service in an executive role, each executive must have achieved an equity ownership level equal to a specified multiple of his or her base salary.

The minimum equity ownership levels are five times annual base salary for our CEO and two times annual base salary for the other Named Executives. Ownership levels are calculated based on actual shares owned plus the estimated after-tax value of restricted and unrestricted shares, deferred stock units and shares held under benefit plans, and potential gains from vested options. The calculation uses a stock value as of the close of market on December 31 of the year immediately preceding the year of calculation.

Executive officers who have held executive positions with us for five years or more have achieved their goals. Newer executive officers are on pace for achieving their ownership targets within the five-year period.

Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging

Our insider trading policy prohibits all directors, officers and other employees designated as access persons (as defined under “Recoupment Policy” above), including their family members and designees, from engaging in speculative trading or hedging of positions in our securities, including purchasing any financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of any of our equity securities. It also prohibits pledges of any company securities (e.g., pledge to a bank or financial institution as collateral for a loan, or pledge to a broker in connection with a market transaction, such as a margin loan).  These prohibitions do not restrict general portfolio diversification transactions or investments in broad-based index funds.

Granting of Equity Awards

We have an equity award approval policy to ensure that all equity awards are approved pursuant to proper authority, follow a consistent process, and are reflected in appropriate documentation. Under the policy, equity awards that have an exercise price or number of shares that are based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant are only granted at times when trading is permitted under our insider trading policy. This policy ensures that the exercise price or number of shares is determined by reference to a stock price that reflects current public information. The policy includes procedures for granting equity awards to executive officers and non-employee directors, as well as all other employees. Under our plans, the exercise price of stock options is based on the fair market value on the date of grant. The plans define fair market value as the closing price of our common stock on the preceding trading day.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Cuts Act”) in December 2017, compensation paid in fiscal 2019 and later years to our Named Executives in excess of $1 million will not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code unless it qualifies for transitional relief applicable to certain binding, written performance-based compensation arrangements that were in place as of November 2, 2017.  No assurance can be given that the compensation associated with these awards will qualify for the transitional relief.  While the Compensation Committee is mindful of the benefit to us of the deductibility, it believes that we should maintain flexibility in compensating our executive officers in a manner that best promotes our corporate objectives.

37

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has discussed and reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Members of the Compensation Committee                             

David Windley (Chair)	William F. Austen
Azita Arvani	David S. Wichmann
Carol S. Eicher

38

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or expensed with respect to, the Named Executives.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)1	Option Awards ($)2	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)3	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)4	All Other Compensation ($)5	Total ($)
H. Chris Killingstad	2019	796,362	—	1,536,002	1,023,787	1,462,752	—	104,280	4,923,183
President and Chief	2018	765,653	—	1,483,646	989,213	945,345	2,046	50,288	4,236,191
Executive Officer	2017	726,375	—	1,406,538	938,059	—	5,978	79,558	3,156,508
Keith A. Woodward6	2019	436,673	—	391,511	260,944	397,686	—	14,054	1,500,868
Senior Vice President and	2018	35,135	—	499,987	—	—	—	753	535,875
Chief Financial Officer
Richard H. Zay	2019	393,563	—	343,519	228,976	361,003	—	51,002	1,378,063
Senior Vice President,	2018	378,127	—	673,508	222,381	215,512	138	35,508	1,525,174
Americas and Global	2017	345,645	—	310,148	206,843	—	364	39,537	902,537
R&D
David W. Huml7	2019	371,494	125,000	324,233	216,136	340,760	—	36,841	1,414,464
Senior Vice President,	2018	355,912	—	603,826	209,908	217,539	208	27,344	1,414,737
EMEA, APAC, Global	2017	322,337	—	289,213	192,899	46,027	593	26,090	877,159
Marketing & Operations
Mary E. Talbott8	2019	321,115	150,000	448,414	165,562	289,122	—	134,571	1,508,784
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

____________________

1Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the annual restricted stock awards and PRSUs (at target) that were granted in each fiscal year. In addition, the amount for Ms. Talbott for 2019 includes a time-based RSU granted when she was hired and the amounts for Messrs. Woodward, Zay and Huml for 2018 include time-based RSUs. Grant date fair values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Footnote 18 “Share-Based Compensation” to our financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, for the assumptions used in this calculation. The grant date fair value of each restricted stock and RSU award and the targeted grant date value of each PRSU award were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based on the closing stock price on the grant date. The grant date fair values for 2019 of restricted stock awards, time-based RSUs and PRSUs if target performance and maximum performance is achieved are as follows:

	Restricted Stock	RSUs	PRSUs ($)
	($)	($)	Target	Maximum
H. Chris Killingstad	512,001	—	1,024,001	2,048,002
Keith A. Woodward	130,483	—	261,029	522,057
Richard H. Zay	114,506	—	229,013	458,025
David W. Huml	108,078	—	216,155	432,311
Mary E. Talbott	82,809	199,988	165,617	331,235

2Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options that were granted in each fiscal year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Footnote 18 “Share-Based Compensation” to our financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, for the assumptions used in this calculation.

3Amounts reflect payments earned under our 2017 and 2018 Short-Term Incentive Plans and 2019 CIP, respectively.

4Amounts include above-market earnings on non-qualified deferred compensation, using 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate as the basis for market earnings.

39

5All Other Compensation for 2019 consists of the following:

	Savings Plan		Non- Qualified Plan	Perquisites
Name	Match ($)	Profit Sharing ($)	Excess ($)	Relocation ($)a	Travel ($)b	Gross- ups ($)c	Executive Physicals ($)	Total ($)
H. Chris Killingstad	8,400	8,400	87,480	—	—	—	—	104,280
Keith A. Woodward	8,400	1,004	4,650	—	—	—	—	14,054
Richard H. Zay	8,400	8,400	19,637	—	5,967	8,598	—	51,002
David W. Huml	8,400	8,400	18,441	—	—	—	1,600	36,841
Mary E. Talbott	8,400	—	955	64,612	—	60,604	—	134,571

aAmount represents reimbursement of Ms. Talbott’s relocation expenses in connection with her relocation to Minnesota when she commenced employment with the Company.

bAmount represents reimbursement of travel expenses for the spouse or guest of the Named Executive in connection with the business incentive trips.

cAmount represents the tax gross-up portion for travel expense reimbursement and, for Ms. Talbott, relocation expense reimbursement, described above.

6Mr. Woodward’s employment with the Company began on December 1, 2018.

7Mr. Huml received a one-time recognition payment.

8Ms. Talbott’s employment with the Company began on January 28, 2019.  In connection with her hire, she received a sign-on cash payment.

40

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table presents information regarding each grant of an award under our compensation plans made during 2019 to the Named Executives.

			Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards			Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards			All other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or	All other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying	Exercise or Base Price of Option	Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option
Name	Grant Date	Approval Date	Threshold ($)	Target ($)	Maximum ($)	Threshold (#)	Target (#)	Maximum (#)	Units (#)	Options (#)	Awards ($/Share)1	Awards ($)2
H. Chris Killingstad
Short-Term Incentive Award3	—	—	480,000	960,000	1,920,000	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
PRSU Award4	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	8,044	16,088	32,176	—	—	—	1,024,001
Restricted Stock Award5	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	8,044	—	—	512,001
Stock Option Award6	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	66,580	63.65	1,023,787
Keith A. Woodward
Short-Term Incentive Award3	—	—	130,500	261,000	522,000	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
PRSU Award4	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	2,051	4,101	8,202	—	—	—	261,029
Restricted Stock Award5	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	2,050	—	—	130,483
Stock Option Award6	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	16,970	63.65	260,944
Richard H. Zay
Short-Term Incentive Award3	—	—	118,462	236,925	473,850	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
PRSU Award4	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	1,799	3,598	7,196	—	—	—	229,013
Restricted Stock Award5	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	1,799	—	—	114,506
Stock Option Award6	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	14,891	63.65	228,976
David W. Huml
Short-Term Incentive Award3	—	—	111,820	223,640	447,280	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
PRSU Award4	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	1,698	3,396	6,792	—	—	—	216,155
Restricted Stock Award5	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	1,698	—	—	108,078
Stock Option Award6	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	14,056	63.65	216,136
Mary E. Talbott
Short-Term Incentive Award3	—	—	94,875	189,750	379,500	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
PRSU Award4	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	1,301	2,602	5,204	—	—	—	165,617
Restricted Stock Award5	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	1,301	—	—	82,809
Stock Option Award6	2/26/2019	2/13/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	10,767	63.65	165,562
RSU Award7	2/26/2019	1/11/2019	—	—	—	—	—	—	3,142	—	—	199,988

____________________

1The exercise price is based on the closing price on the last trading day prior to the date of grant.

2The actual value to be realized by a Named Executive depends upon the appreciation in value of our common stock and the length of time the award is held. No value will be realized with respect to any stock option award if the price of our common stock does not increase following the grant date.

3Under our 2019 Executive Officer Cash Incentive Plan, the threshold amount represents a minimum performance that results in a payout equal to 50% of the target award and the maximum payout is 200% of target. Payout amounts are based on achievement of annual goals relating to Adjusted EBITDA$, Adjusted EBITDA% and Total Revenue. The actual 2019 CIP payouts are reported in the Summary Compensation Table above.

4Under our 2019-2021 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the threshold amount of PRSUs represents a minimum performance that results in a payout in shares of common stock equal to 50% of the target award and the maximum payout is 200% of target. The PRSUs were granted under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan and will vest on December 31, 2021 based on achievement of Incentive ROIC and Incentive Cumulative Earnings Per Share goals for the 2019-2021, performance period. No dividend equivalents are paid on PRSUs.

5The shares of restricted stock were granted under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan and vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date. Dividends are accumulated on restricted stock during the vesting period and paid in cash upon vesting.

6The stock options were granted under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan and vest 33.33% annually over a three-year term beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

7The RSUs were granted under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan in connection with the commencement of Ms. Talbott’s employment and vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date.

41

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2019 FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table presents information regarding outstanding equity awards held at the end of 2019 by the Named Executives.

	Option Awards					Stock Awards
Name	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)1	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)1	Option Exercise Price ($/Share)	Option Expiration Date	Grant Date	Number  of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)2	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)3	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)4
H. Chris Killingstad	02/26/2010	25,682	—	24.21	02/26/2020	02/28/2017	6,405	499,078	—	—
	02/25/2011	39,557	—	40.21	02/25/2021	02/27/2018	7,305	569,206	—	—
	02/24/2012	37,824	—	43.66	02/24/2022	02/27/2018	—	—	14,610	1,138,411
	02/22/2013	36,149	—	47.03	02/22/2023	02/26/2019	8,044	626,788	—	—
	02/28/2014	27,767	—	60.67	02/28/2024	02/26/2019	—	—	16,088	1,253,576
	02/27/2015	44,500	—	66.97	02/27/2025
	02/26/2016	69,027	—	52.42	02/26/2026
	02/28/2017	37,989	18,995	73.20	02/28/2027
	02/27/2018	20,568	41,134