XML 60 R34.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Goodwill and Asset Impairments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill

20. Goodwill

The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended Dec. 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(millions)

 

NMGC

 

 

Total

 

Balance as of Dec. 31, 2013

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.0

 

Acquisition of NMGC

 

 

408.3

 

 

 

408.3

 

Balance as of Dec. 31, 2014

 

 

408.3

 

 

 

408.3

 

Measurement period adjustments (1)

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

Balance as of Dec. 31, 2015

 

$

408.4

 

 

$

408.4

 

(1)

Due to immateriality, the measurement period adjustment was not applied retrospectively to the opening balance sheet.

The goodwill on the company’s balance sheet related to the NMGC segment was recorded upon acquisition of NMGI on Sept. 2, 2014 (see Note 21). Under the accounting guidance for goodwill, goodwill is not subject to amortization. Rather, goodwill is subject to an annual assessment for impairment at the reporting unit level. Reporting units are generally determined at the operating segment level or one level below the operating segment level; reporting units with similar characteristics are grouped for the purpose of determining the impairment, if any, of goodwill. Since NMGC is the lowest level of identifiable cash flows, this is the level at which goodwill is tested. Entities assessing goodwill for impairment have the option of first performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether a quantitative assessment is necessary. If an entity performs the qualitative assessment, but determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount or if an entity bypasses the qualitative assessment, a quantitative two-step, fair value-based test is performed. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed. The second step requires an allocation of fair value to the individual assets and liabilities using purchase price allocation accounting guidance in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recorded as a reduction to goodwill and a charge to operating expense. TECO Energy reviews recorded goodwill at least annually (during the fourth quarter) for each reporting unit.

The fair value for NMGC was determined in the fourth quarter using a weighted combination of a discounted cash flow analysis, a market multiple analysis, and a comparable transactions analysis. The discounted cash flow analysis relies on management’s best estimate of NMGC’s projected cash flows. It includes an estimate of NMGC’s terminal value based on these expected cash flows using the Gordon Growth Formula, which derives a valuation using an assumed perpetual annuity based on the entity’s residual cash flows. The discount rate is a market participant rate based on a peer group of publicly traded comparable companies and represents the weighted average cost of capital of comparable companies. The market multiples analysis utilizes multiples of business enterprise value to EBITDA of comparable public companies in estimating fair value. The comparable transaction analysis identified comparable company acquisitions within the industry and calculates the implied EBITDA multiple from the transaction, which is then applied to the last-twelve-months EBITDA of the subject company. Significant assumptions used in estimating the fair value include discount and growth rates, utility sector market performance and transactions, projected operating and capital cash flows and the calculation of the terminal value.

The company determined the fair value of NMGC exceeds the book value and related goodwill carrying amounts at Dec. 31, 2015 and 2014, resulting in no impairment charge. Adverse changes in assumptions described above could result in a future material impairment of NMGC’s goodwill.