XML 57 R31.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Measurements

17. Fair Value Measurements

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Accounting guidance governing fair value measurements and disclosures provides that fair value represents the amount that would be received in selling an asset or the amount that would be paid in transferring a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based upon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, accounting guidance also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques noted under accounting guidance:

 

(A)

Market approach: Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities;

 

(B)

Cost approach: Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost); and

 

(C)

Income approach: Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based upon market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing and excess earnings models).

The fair value of financial instruments is determined by using various market data and other valuation techniques.

The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy, the company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of Dec. 31, 2015 and 2014. As required by accounting standards for fair value measurements, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Recurring Fair Value Measures

 

 

 

As of Dec. 31, 2015

 

(millions)

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas derivatives

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

0.2

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas derivatives

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

26.2

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

26.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of Dec. 31, 2014

 

(millions)

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas derivatives

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

42.7

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

42.7

 

 

The natural gas derivatives are OTC swap and option instruments.  Fair values of swaps and options are estimated utilizing the market and income approach, respectively.  The price of swaps is calculated using observable NYMEX quoted closing prices of exchange-traded futures. The price of options is calculated using the Black-Scholes model with observable exchange-traded futures as the primary pricing inputs to the model. Additional inputs to the model include historical volatility, discount rate, and a locational basis adjustment to NYMEX. The resulting prices are applied to the notional quantities of active swap and option positions to determine the fair value (see Note 16). 

The company considered the impact of nonperformance risk in determining the fair value of derivatives. The company considered the net position with each counterparty, past performance of both parties, the intent of the parties, indications of credit deterioration and whether the markets in which the company transacts have experienced dislocation. At Dec. 31, 2015, the fair value of derivatives was not materially affected by nonperformance risk. There were no Level 3 assets or liabilities for the periods presented.

See Notes 5, 7 and 19 for information regarding the fair value of the company’s pension plan investments, long-term debt, and asset impairment charge, respectively.

Tampa Electric Company [Member]  
Fair Value Measurements

14. Fair Value Measurements

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Accounting guidance governing fair value measurements and disclosures provides that fair value represents the amount that would be received in selling an asset or the amount that would be paid in transferring a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based upon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, accounting guidance also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

 

Level 1:

Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets;

 

Level 2:

Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

 

Level 3:

Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value based on one or more of the following three valuation techniques noted under accounting guidance:

 

(A)

Market approach: Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities;

 

(B)

Cost approach: Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost); and

 

(C)

Income approach: Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based upon market expectations (including present value techniques, option-pricing and excess earnings models).

The fair value of financial instruments is determined by using various market data and other valuation techniques.

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy TEC’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of Dec. 31, 2015 and 2014. As required by accounting standards for fair value measurements, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. TEC’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.  

Recurring Derivative Fair Value Measures

 

 

 

As of Dec. 31, 2015

 

(millions)

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas swaps

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

26.2

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

26.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of Dec. 31, 2014

 

(millions)

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Natural gas swaps

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

42.7

 

 

$

0.0

 

 

$

42.7

 

Natural gas swaps are OTC swap instruments. The fair value of the swaps is estimated utilizing the market approach. The price of swaps is calculated using observable NYMEX quoted closing prices of exchange-traded futures. These prices are applied to the notional quantities of active positions to determine the reported fair value (see Note 13).

TEC considered the impact of nonperformance risk in determining the fair value of derivatives. TEC considered the net position with each counterparty, past performance of both parties, the intent of the parties, indications of credit deterioration and whether the markets in which TEC transacts have experienced dislocation. At Dec. 31, 2015, the fair value of derivatives was not materially affected by nonperformance risk. There were no Level 3 assets or liabilities for the periods presented.