XML 43 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 30, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies
E.   Commitments and Contingencies

Purchase Commitments

The Company had outstanding total non-cancelable purchase commitments of $109.3 million at March 30, 2013. These commitments are made up of hops and malt totaling $34.4 million, equipment and machinery of $37.1 million, glass bottles of $15.5 million, advertising contracts of $12.1 million, and other of $10.2 million.

 

The Company has entered into contracts for the supply of a portion of its hops requirements. These purchase contracts extend through crop year 2016 and specify both the quantities and prices, mostly denominated in Euros, to which the Company is committed. Hops purchase commitments outstanding at March 30, 2013 totaled $22.9 million, based on the exchange rates on that date.

Currently, the Company has entered into contracts for barley, wheat, and malt with one major supplier. The contracts include crop year 2012 and 2013 and covers the Company’s barley and wheat requirements for 2013 and a portion of 2014. Barley, wheat and malt purchase commitments outstanding at March 30, 2013 totaled $11.5 million. The Company entered into additional contracts on April 4, 2013 which totaled $6.2 million.

The Company sources glass bottles pursuant to a Glass Bottle Supply Agreement with Ardagh Glass Inc., successor in interest to Anchor Glass Container Corporation (“Ardagh”) under which Ardagh is the exclusive supplier of certain glass bottles for the Company’s Cincinnati Brewery and the Pennsylvania Brewery. This agreement also establishes the terms on which Ardagh may supply glass bottles to other breweries where the Company brews its beers. Under the agreement with Ardagh, the Company has minimum and maximum purchase commitments that are based on Company-provided production estimates which, under normal business conditions, are expected to be fulfilled. Minimum purchase commitments under this agreement, assuming Ardagh is unable to replace production demand cancelled by the Company, as of March 30, 2013 totaled $15.5 million.

Currently, the Company brews and packages more than 90% of its core brands volume at Company-owned breweries. In the normal course of its business, the Company has historically entered into various production arrangements with other brewing companies. Pursuant to these arrangements, the Company purchases the liquid produced by those brewing companies, including the raw materials that are used in the liquid, at the time such liquid goes into fermentation. The Company is required to repurchase all unused raw materials purchased by the brewing company specifically for the Company’s beers at the brewing company’s cost upon termination of the production arrangement. The Company is also obligated to meet annual volume requirements in conjunction with certain production arrangements, which are not material to the Company’s operations.

Litigation

During the quarter ended March 30, 2013, the Company’s previously-reported appeal of the adverse decision regarding the Company’s claims arising out of the change in ownership in 2009 of the High Falls brewery located in Rochester, New York, was denied.

The Company is not a party to any pending or threatened litigation, the outcome of which would be expected to have a material adverse effect upon its financial condition or the results of its operations. In general, while the Company believes it conducts its business appropriately in accordance with laws, regulations and industry guidelines, claims, whether or not meritorious, could be asserted against the Company that might adversely impact the Company’s results.

Environmental Matters

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with the City of Cincinnati (the “City”) to complete a remediation in accordance with a remediation plan on environmentally contaminated land to be purchased by the City which is adjacent to Company-owned land at the Cincinnati Brewery (the “Property”). In the third quarter of 2010, the City was awarded a Clean Ohio Revitalization Fund grant (“CORF Grant”) for the Property and will use these funds to complete the purchase of the Property and will provide funds to the Company to remediate the contaminated land and demolish certain other buildings on adjacent parcels. The Company paid approximately $0.3 million to the City for an option to purchase the Property after it has been fully remediated to enable potential future expansion at the Cincinnati Brewery, which is included in property, plant and equipment, net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In connection with these agreements, the Company recorded a current liability and an equal and offsetting other asset of approximately $2.6 million for the estimated total cleanup costs for which it is responsible under the remediation plan and the related CORF Grant, respectively. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company would not be reimbursed by the City for any remediation cost above the currently estimated cleanup cost of approximately $2.6 million.

During the second quarter of 2012, the Company entered into a second agreement with the City to complete a remediation in accordance with a remediation plan on environmentally contaminated land purchased by the Company which is also adjacent to Company-owned land at the Cincinnati Brewery (the “Second Property”). The City was awarded a Clean Ohio Revitalization Fund grant (“CORF II Grant”) and will provide funds to the Company to offset a portion of the purchase price of the Second Property, clean-up the contaminated land and buildings and to then demolish the buildings located on the Second Property. The Company paid approximately $263,000 to purchase the Second Property, which is included in property, plant and equipment, net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In connection with these arrangements, the Company recorded a current liability and an equal and offsetting other asset of approximately $663,000 for the estimated total acquisition and cleanup costs for which it is responsible under the remediation plan and the related CORF II Grant, respectively. Under the terms of the agreement with the City, the Company would not be reimbursed by the City for any remediation cost above the currently estimated acquisition and cleanup costs of approximately $663,000.

The Company accrues for environmental remediation-related activities for which commitments or cleanup plans have been developed and for which costs can be reasonably estimated. All accrued amounts are generally determined in coordination with third-party experts on an undiscounted basis. In light of existing reserves, any additional remediation costs above the currently estimated cost of $3.2 million will not, in the opinion of management, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.