XML 28 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value Measurement [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

NOTE 8 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

 

ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data and requires disclosures for assets and liabilities measured at fair value based on their level in the hierarchy. Also, ASC Topic 820 provides clarification that in circumstances, in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liabilities is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the techniques provided for in this update.

 

The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of input, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following:

 

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 - Input other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets of liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

 

The following table sets forth the liabilities at December 31, 2016 and 2015, which is recorded on the balance sheet at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required, these are classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:

 

     Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
  
 
 
December 31,
2015
 
 
 
 

 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
 
 
 
 

 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
 
 
     (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Derivative liability $2,820,000  $-  $ -  $2,820,000 
Contingent liability  1,000,000           1,000,000 
Stock settled debt  12,500   10,000   -   2,500 
                 
  $3,832,500  $10,000  $-  $3,822,500 

 

The roll forward of the Contingent liability is as follows:

 

Balance December 31, 2015 $1,000,000 
Fair value adjustment  (1,000,000)
Balance December 31, 2016  0 

 

     

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

 
  December 31, 2016  Quoted 
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
  Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
     (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Derivative liability – stock warrants $1,250,000   -          -  $1,250,000 
Derivative liability – Series C Preferred Stock  2,093,623   -   -   2,093,623 
  $3,343,623   -   -  $3,343,623 

 

From time to time, certain assets may be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These non-recurring fair value adjustments typically are the result of impairment determinations. The following tables present the carrying value of such assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, and gains and losses recognized during the period. The carrying values in this table represent only these assets marked to fair value during the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

  Carrying value as of December 31, 2016  Fair value adjustments for the year ended December 31, 
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total  2016 
Customer lists  -   -   -   -   (1,255,269)