XML 39 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

2.       Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


a.       Basis of Presentation


The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial reporting. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected. The results reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements should not necessarily be taken as indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.


b.       Principles of Consolidation


The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.


c.        Use of Estimates       


 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


d.       Concentration of Risk


        For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, one automotive original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) customer within the Catalyst segment accounted for 33% and 28%, respectively, of the Company's revenues. This customer accounted for 11%, and 18%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.  No other customers accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenues during these periods.


        For the periods presented below, certain customers accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s accounts receivable balance as follows:


Customer

June 30,

2012

 

December 31,

2011

A

28%

 

10%

B

14%

 

 4%

C

 

11%

D

 3%

 

14%


        Customer A above is an automotive OEM, customers B and C are diesel distributors and customer D is a diesel systems installer.


        For the periods presented below, certain vendors accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s raw material purchases as follows:


 

Three Months Ended

June 30,

 

Six Months Ended

June 30,

Vendor

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

A

13%

 

17%

 

13%

 

18%

B

4%

 

11%

 

6%

 

9%

C

12%

 

3%

 

11%

 

3%


        Vendor A above is a catalyst supplier, vendor B is a substrate supplier and vendor C is a rare earth material supplier.


e.       Net Loss per Share


        Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares. Dilutive potential common shares include employee stock options and restricted share units (“RSUs”) and other warrants and debt that are convertible into the Company’s common stock.


        Diluted net loss per share excludes certain dilutive potential common shares outstanding as their effect is anti-dilutive. Because the Company incurred net losses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the effect of potentially dilutive securities has been excluded in the computation of net loss per share and net loss from continuing operations per share as their impact would be anti-dilutive. Potential common stock equivalents excluded consist of the following (in thousands):


 

June 30,

 

2012

 

2011

Common stock options

801

 

303

RSUs

187

 

20

Warrants

935

 

891

Convertible notes

370

 

370

      Total

2,293

 

1,584


     f.       Fair Value Measurements


Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset and liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a fair value hierarchy has been established that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:


  • Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
  • Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable including quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
  • Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

         The fair values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate carrying values due to the short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of borrowings under the line of credit approximates their carrying value due to their variable interest rates. The fair value of shareholder notes payable is approximately $4.5 million at June 30, 2012 based on estimated rates currently available to the Company. The carrying amount of the Company's capital lease obligations approximates the fair value. See Note 9 regarding the fair value of the Company’s warrants.


g.       Accounting Changes


        In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).” This pronouncement was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. This pronouncement is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The guidance concerns disclosure only and adoption did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.


        In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” which was issued to enhance comparability between entities that report under U.S. GAAP and IFRS, and to provide a more consistent method of presenting non-owner transactions that affect an entity’s equity. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This pronouncement is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and full retrospective application is required. The guidance concerns disclosure only and adoption did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.