XML 37 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Related Person Transactions
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Related Person Transactions  
Related Person Transactions

9. Related Person Transactions

We have adopted written Governance Guidelines that describe the consideration and approval of related person transactions. Under these Governance Guidelines, we may not enter into a transaction in which any Trustee or executive officer, any member of the immediate family of any Trustee or executive officer or other related person, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest unless that transaction has been disclosed or made known to our Board of Trustees and our Board of Trustees reviews and approves or ratifies the transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested Trustees, even if the disinterested Trustees constitute less than a quorum. If there are no disinterested Trustees, the transaction must be reviewed, authorized and approved or ratified by both (i) the affirmative vote of a majority of our Board of Trustees and (ii) the affirmative vote of a majority of our Independent Trustees. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, our Board of Trustees, or disinterested Trustees or Independent Trustees, as the case may be, also act in accordance with any applicable provisions of our declaration of trust and bylaws, consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and approve only those transactions that they determine are fair and reasonable to us.  All related person transactions described below were reviewed and approved or ratified by a majority of the disinterested Trustees or otherwise in accordance with our policies, declaration of trust and bylaws, each as described above. In the case of transactions with us by employees of RMR Inc. and its subsidiaries who are subject to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, but who are not Trustees or executive officers of us, the employee must seek approval from an executive officer who has no interest in the matter for which approval is being requested. Copies of our Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on our website, www.hptreit.com.  

TA.  TA is our former 100% owned subsidiary and our largest tenant, and we are TA’s largest shareholder. TA was created as a separate public company in 2007 as a result of its spin-off from us. As of December 31, 2015, we owned 3,420,000 common shares, representing approximately 8.8% of TA’s outstanding common shares. Mr. Barry Portnoy, one of our Managing Trustees, is a Managing Director of TA.  Mr. Thomas O’Brien, a former officer of ours prior to the TA spin-off, is President and Chief Executive Officer and the other managing director of TA; he is also an officer of RMR LLC. TA’s Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel are also officers of RMR LLC. Mr. Arthur Koumantzelis, who was one of our Independent Trustees prior to the TA spin-off, serves as an independent director of TA.

TA is the lessee of 37% of our real estate properties, at cost, as of December 31, 2015.  Until June 2015, TA had two leases with us, the TA No. 1 lease, which we refer to as the Prior TA Lease, and the TA No. 2 lease, which we refer to as the Prior Petro Lease. We refer to the Prior TA Lease and Prior Petro Lease collectively as the Prior Leases.  The Prior TA Lease was for travel centers that TA operates under the “TravelCenters of America” or “TA” brand names. The Prior Petro Lease was for travel centers that TA operates under the “Petro” brand name.  As described below, in June 2015, the Prior TA Lease was expanded and subdivided into four amended and restated leases, which we refer to as the New TA Leases, and the Prior Petro Lease was amended. 

On April 15, 2013, TA entered an agreement with Shell Oil Products US, or Shell, pursuant to which Shell has agreed to construct a network of natural gas fueling lanes at up to 100 of TA’s travel centers located along the U.S. interstate highway system, including travel centers TA leases from us. In connection with that agreement, on April 15, 2013, we and TA amended our Prior Leases to specify the economic equivalent for natural gas sales to diesel fuel sales for the calculation of percentage rent payable to us under the leases, with the intended effect that the amount of percentage rent be unaffected by the type of fuel sold, whether diesel fuel or natural gas. That amendment also made certain administrative changes. Also on that date, in order to facilitate TA’s agreement with Shell, we entered into a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement with Shell, whereby we agreed to recognize Shell’s license and other rights with respect to the natural gas fueling lanes at our travel centers leased to TA on certain conditions and in certain circumstances.

On July 1, 2013, we purchased land that we previously leased from a third party and subleased to TA. Effective as of that date, rents due to that third party and TA’s reimbursement of those rents of approximately $545 annually to us under the terms of the Prior TA Lease ceased. Also on that date, we and TA amended the Prior TA Lease to reflect our direct lease to TA of that land and certain minor properties adjacent to other existing travel centers included in the lease that we also had purchased and to increase the annual rent payable by TA under the Prior TA Lease to us by $537, which equaled 8.5% of our total investment in these properties.

On August 13, 2013, a travel center located in Roanoke, VA that we leased to TA was taken by eminent domain proceedings brought by the Virginia Department of Transportation, or VDOT, in connection with certain highway construction. The Prior TA Lease provided that the annual rent payable by TA to us was reduced by 8.5% of the amount of the proceeds we receive from the taking or, at our option, the fair market value rent of the property on the commencement date of the Prior TA Lease. In January 2014, we received proceeds from the VDOT of $6,178, which is a substantial portion of the VDOT’s estimate of the value of the property, and as a result the annual rent payable by TA to us under the Prior TA Lease was reduced by $525 effective January 6, 2014. We and TA are challenging the VDOT’s estimate of this property’s value and we expect that the final resolution of this matter will take considerable time.  Following the VDOT taking, we entered a lease agreement with the VDOT to lease this property for $40 per month; and we entered into a sublease with TA for TA to continue operating the property as a travel center and TA became responsible to pay this VDOT lease rent. Following expiration of this lease, in November 2014, this property was surrendered to the VDOT.

In December 2013, we acquired land adjacent to an existing travel center leased to TA. In connection with that acquisition, we amended the Prior TA Lease to add this property to that lease. As a result of this amendment, the minimum annual rent payable to us by TA under the Prior TA Lease increased by $105, which equaled 8.5% of our investment in this acquired land.

On June 1, 2015, we entered a transaction agreement with TA, or the TA Transaction Agreement, pursuant to which the following transactions were completed as of December 31, 2015:

·

We entered into the New TA Leases with a subsidiary of TA, or our TA No. 1 agreement, TA No. 2 agreement, TA No. 3 agreement and TA No. 4 agreement, with expirations in 2029, 2028, 2026 and 2030, respectively.  Each New TA Lease grants TA two renewal options of 15 years each. Percentage rent, which totaled $2,902 in 2014 under the Prior TA Lease, was incorporated into the annual minimum rent under the New TA Leases and was otherwise eliminated for the remainder of 2015; thereafter, percentage rent will be equal to 3% of the excess of gross non-fuel revenues over gross non-fuel revenues in 2015.  In the case of the five properties to be developed by TA and sold to us (further described below), the base year for percentage rent will be the calendar year in which the third anniversary of the completion of development of the property occurs and percentage rent will not apply to those properties until the next succeeding year. Our deferred rent obligation of $107,085 owed by TA under the Prior TA Lease, and due December 31, 2022, was allocated among the New TA Leases and the due dates were extended to the end of the initial term of each respective New TA Lease.

·

We purchased from TA, for $279,383,  14 travel centers it owned and certain assets it owned at 11 properties we then leased to TA. We leased back these properties to TA under the New TA Leases.  The annual minimum rent payable to us increased by $24,027 as a result of the completion of this purchase and sale leaseback.

·

TA purchased from us, for $45,042,  five travel centers that we previously leased to TA under the Prior TA Lease.  These properties were subleased by TA to its franchisees.  TA’s annual minimum rent decreased by $3,874 as a result of our completion of the sale of these properties.  We recognized a gain of $11,015 on these sales.

·

We and TA entered into an amendment to the Prior Petro Lease, and which we now refer to as our TA No. 5 agreement.  Among other things, this amendment eliminated percentage rent payable on fuel, which, in 2014 was nominal but was not paid by TA because we had previously waived payment of the first $2,500 of percentage rent due under the TA No. 5 agreement.

Under the TA Transaction Agreement, we also agreed to purchase from TA five travel centers upon the completion of their development at a purchase price equal to their development costs, including the cost of the land, which costs are estimated to be not more than $118,000 in the aggregate and we agreed to leaseback these development properties to TA under the New TA Leases.  These purchase/leaseback transactions remain to be completed.  The terms of the TA Transaction Agreement were approved by special committees of our Independent Trustees and TA’s independent directors, none of whom are directors or trustees of the other company.  Each special committee was represented by separate counsel.

In October 2015, we purchased the land and certain improvements at a travel center we then leased from a third party and subleased to TA located in Waterloo, NY for $15,000.  Upon this acquisition, the land and improvements were directly leased to TA under our TA No. 5 agreement and TA’s annual minimum rent increased by $1,275, but its obligation to pay the ground rent of $1,260 annually was terminated.

As of December 31, 2015, we leased to TA a total of 153 travel centers under the New TA Leases and 40 travel centers under the TA No. 5 agreement. As of December 31, 2015, the number of travel centers leased, the term, the annual minimum rent and deferred rent balances under our five leases with TA were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Sites

 

Initial Term End (1)

 

Minimum Annual Rent as of December 31, 2015(2)

 

Deferred Rent (3)

TA No. 1 Agreement

 

39

 

December 31, 2029

$

48,862

$

27,421

TA No. 2 Agreement

 

38

 

December 31, 2028

 

47,229

 

29,107

TA No. 3 Agreement

 

38

 

December 31, 2026

 

50,077

 

29,324

TA No. 4 Agreement

 

38

 

December 31, 2030

 

46,680

 

21,233

TA No. 5 Agreement

 

40

 

June 30, 2024

 

64,875

 

42,915

 

 

193

 

 

$

257,723

$

150,000

(1)TA has two renewal options of fifteen years each under each of the leases.

(2)These minimum rents are exclusive of any increase in minimum rent as a result of our funding or reimbursing costs of improvements to leased travel centers or purchase/leaseback of additional travel centers occurring after December 31, 2015.

(3)The deferred rent obligation is subject to acceleration at our option upon an uncured default under our TA agreements or a change in control of TA, each as provided under the leases. 

Our leases with TA are “triple net” leases that require TA to pay all costs incurred in the operation of the leased travel centers, including personnel, utility, inventory, customer service and insurance expenses, real estate and personal property taxes, environmental related expenses, underground storage tank removal costs and ground lease payments at those travel centers at which we lease the property and sublease it to TA. TA also is required generally to indemnify us for certain environmental matters and for liabilities which arise during the terms of the leases from ownership or operation of the leased travel centers. In addition, TA is obligated to pay us at lease expiration an amount equal to an estimate of the cost of removing underground storage tanks on the leased properties. The leases also include arbitration provisions for the resolution of disputes. 

We recognized rental income of $250,582,  $225,394 and $219,050 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, under our leases with TA.  Rental income for 2015, 2014 and 2013 includes $9,100,  $1,580 and $1,783, respectively, of adjustments necessary to record the scheduled rent increase on our Prior TA Lease and the estimated future payment to us by TA for the cost of removing underground storage tanks on a straight line basis. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we had accruals for unpaid amounts of $50,987,  $40,253 and $37,034, respectively, owed to us by TA (excluding any deferred rents), which amounts are included in due from related persons on our consolidated balance sheets.  On June 9, 2015, we began recognizing the deferred rent obligation under our TA agreements as rental income on a straight line basis over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases because we believe the future payment of these amounts to us by TA is reasonably assured.

We waived $1,121,  $624 and $383 of percentage rent under the TA No. 5 agreement for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, we have cumulatively waived $2,128 of the $2,500 of percentage rent we previously agreed to waive. The total amount of percentage rent from TA that we recognized (which is net of the waived amount) was $2,048,  $2,896 and $2,102 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Under our leases with TA, TA may request that we fund approved amounts for renovations, improvements and equipment at the leased travel centers in return for increases in TA’s minimum annual rent according to the following formula: the minimum rent per year is increased by an amount equal to the amount funded by us multiplied by the greater of (i) 8.5% or (ii) a benchmark U.S. Treasury interest rate plus 3.5%. We are not required to fund these improvements and TA is not required to sell them to us. In addition to purchases of improvements we made pursuant to the TA Transaction Agreement described above, pursuant to our leases with TA, we funded $99,896,  $66,133 and $83,912 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, for qualifying capital improvements to travel centers leased by TA and TA’s annual minimum rent payable to us increased by approximately $8,491,  $5,621 and $7,133, respectively, as a result. 

RMR LLC provides management services to both us and TA and certain of TA’s executive officers are officers of RMR LLC.  At the time TA became a separate publicly owned company as a result of the distribution of its shares to our shareholders, TA entered into a business management agreement with RMR LLC.  In addition, in connection with TA’s spin-off, TA entered a transaction agreement with us and RMR LLC, pursuant to which TA granted us a right of first refusal to purchase, lease, mortgage or otherwise finance any interest TA owns in a travel center before it sells, leases, mortgages or otherwise finances that travel center to or with another party, and TA also granted us and any other company managed by RMR LLC a right of first refusal to acquire or finance any real estate of the types in which we or they invest before TA does.  TA also agreed that for so long as TA is a tenant of ours it will not permit: the acquisition by any person or group of beneficial ownership of 9.8% or more of the voting shares or the power to direct the management and policies of TA or any of its subsidiary tenants or guarantors under its leases with us; the sale of a material part of the assets of TA or any such tenant or guarantor; or the cessation of certain continuing directors constituting a majority of the board of directors of TA or any such tenant or guarantor.  Also, TA agreed not to take any action that might reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact on our ability to qualify as a REIT and to indemnify us for any liabilities we may incur relating to TA’s assets and business.  The transaction agreement includes arbitration provisions for the resolution of disputes.

Our Manager, RMR LLC.  We have no employees. The personnel and various services we require to operate our business are provided to us by RMR LLC.  We have two agreements with RMR LLC to provide management services to us: (i) a business management agreement, which relates to our business generally, and (ii) a property management agreement, which relates to our property level operations of the office building component of only one property in Baltimore, MD, which also includes a Royal Sonesta hotel. Both of these management agreements are described below in this Note under “—Management Agreements with RMR LLC.”

One of our Managing Trustees, Mr. Barry Portnoy, is a Managing Director, officer and controlling shareholder (through ABP Trust) of RMR Inc. and an officer of RMR LLC.  Our other Managing Trustee, Mr. Adam Portnoy, is a Managing Director, President,  Chief Executive Officer and controlling shareholder (through ABP Trust) of RMR Inc. and an officer of RMR LLC.  ABP Trust is owned by Messrs. Barry and Adam Portnoy, Messrs. Barry and Adam Portnoy also own class A membership units of RMR LLC through their ownership of ABP Trust.  Each of our executive officers is also an officer of RMR LLC, including Mr. Ethan Bornstein, who is the son-in-law of Mr. Barry Portnoy and the brother-in-law of Mr. Adam Portnoy.  Certain of TA’s and Sonesta’s executive officers are officers of RMR LLC.  Our Independent Trustees also serve as independent directors or independent trustees of other companies to which RMR LLC or its affiliates provide management services.  Mr. Barry Portnoy serves as a director, managing director, trustee or managing trustee of all of the companies to which RMR LLC or its affiliate provides management services and Mr. Adam Portnoy serves as a director, trustee or managing trustee of a majority of those companies.  In addition, officers of RMR LLC and RMR Inc. serve as our officers and officers of other companies to which RMR LLC or its affiliates provide management services.

Acquisition of Interest in our Manager:  On June 5, 2015, we and three other REITs to which RMR LLC provides management services – Government Properties Income Trust, or GOV, Select Income REIT, or SIR, and Senior Housing Properties Trust, or SNH, and collectively with GOV and SIR, the Other REITs – participated in a transaction, or the Up-C Transaction, by which we and the Other REITs each acquired class A common stock of RMR Inc.

The Up-C Transaction was completed pursuant to a transaction agreement by and among us, our manager, RMR LLC, its then sole member, ABP Trust, and RMR Inc. and similar transaction agreements that each Other REIT entered into with RMR LLC, ABP Trust and RMR Inc.  Pursuant to these transaction agreements: we contributed to RMR Inc. 1,490,000 of our common shares and $12,622 in cash; GOV contributed to RMR Inc. 700,000 of its common shares and $3,917 in cash; SIR contributed to RMR Inc. 880,000 of its common shares and $15,880 in cash; SNH contributed to RMR Inc. 2,345,000 of its common shares and $13,967 in cash; ABP Trust contributed to RMR Inc. $11,520 in cash, which RMR Inc. contributed to RMR LLC; RMR LLC issued 1,000,000 of its class B membership units to RMR Inc.; RMR Inc. issued 5,019,121 shares of its class A common stock to us, 1,541,201 shares of its class A common stock to GOV, 3,166,891 shares of its class A common stock to SIR, 5,272,787 shares of its class A common stock to SNH, and 1,000,000 shares of its class B-1 common stock and 15,000,000 shares of its class B-2 common stock to ABP Trust; ABP Trust delivered 15,000,000 of the 30,000,000 class A membership units of RMR LLC which ABP Trust then owned to RMR Inc.; and RMR Inc. delivered to ABP Trust our common shares, the common shares of the Other REITs and the cash which had been contributed by us and the Other REITs to RMR Inc.

The class A common stock and class B-1 common stock of RMR Inc. share ratably as a single class in dividends and other distributions of RMR Inc. when and if declared by the board of directors of RMR Inc. and have the same rights in a liquidation of RMR Inc.  The class B-1 common stock of RMR Inc. is convertible into class A common stock of RMR Inc. on a 1:1 basis.  The class A common stock of RMR Inc. has one vote per share.  The class B-1 common stock of RMR Inc. has 10 votes per share.  The class B-2 common stock of RMR Inc. has no economic interest in RMR Inc., but has 10 votes per share and is paired with the class A membership units of RMR LLC owned by ABP Trust.  Upon request by ABP Trust, RMR LLC is required to redeem the class A membership units of RMR LLC owned by ABP Trust for class A common stock of RMR Inc. on a 1:1 basis, or if RMR Inc. elects, for cash.  Under the governing documents of RMR Inc., upon the redemption of a class A membership unit of RMR LLC, the share of class B-2 common stock of RMR Inc. “paired” with the class A membership unit being redeemed is cancelled for no additional consideration.

As part of the Up-C Transaction and concurrently with entering the transaction agreements, on June 5, 2015:

 

·

We entered into an amended and restated business management agreement with RMR LLC and an amended and restated property management agreement with RMR LLC.  The amendments made by these agreements are described below in this Note under “—Management Agreements with RMR LLC.”  Each Other REIT also entered amended and restated business and property management agreements with RMR LLC, which made similar amendments to their management agreements with RMR LLC.

 

·

We entered into a registration rights agreement with RMR Inc. covering the class A common stock of RMR Inc. that we received in the Up-C Transaction, pursuant to which we received demand and piggyback registration rights, subject to certain limitations.  Each Other REIT entered into a similar registration rights agreement with RMR Inc.

 

·

We entered into a lock up and registration rights agreement with ABP Trust and Messrs. Barry and Adam Portnoy pursuant to which ABP Trust and Barry and Adam Portnoy agreed not to transfer the 1,490,000 of our common shares ABP Trust received in the Up-C Transaction for a period of 10 years and we granted them certain registration rights, subject to certain limited exceptions.  Each Other REIT also entered into a similar lock up and registration rights agreement with ABP Trust and Messrs. Barry and Adam Portnoy.

As a result of the Up-C Transaction: RMR LLC became a subsidiary of RMR Inc.; RMR Inc. became the managing member of RMR LLC; through our ownership of class A common stock of RMR Inc., we became a holder of an indirect economic interest in RMR LLC; and through their ownership of class A common stock of RMR Inc., GOV, SIR and SNH also became holders of indirect economic interests in RMR LLC.  Through its ownership of class B-1 common stock of RMR Inc., class B-2 common stock of RMR Inc. and class A membership units of RMR LLC, ABP Trust holds, directly and indirectly, a 51.6% economic interest in RMR LLC and controls 91.4% of the voting power of outstanding capital stock of RMR Inc.

 

Pursuant to the transaction agreements, on December 14, 2015 we distributed 2,515,344 shares of class A common stock of RMR Inc. to our shareholders as a special distribution, which represented approximately half of the shares of class A common stock of RMR Inc. we received in the Up-C Transaction; each Other REIT also distributed approximately half of the shares of class A common stock of RMR Inc. they received in the Up-C Transaction to their respective shareholders.  RMR Inc. facilitated this distribution by filing a registration statement with the SEC to register the shares of class A common stock of RMR Inc. being distributed and by listing those shares on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.  Following this distribution, we currently hold 2,503,777 shares of class A common stock of RMR Inc. and GOV, SIR and SNH currently hold 1,214,225,  1,586,836 and 2,637,408 shares of class A common stock of RMR Inc., respectively. In connection with this distribution, we recognized a non-cash loss of $36,773 in the fourth quarter of 2015 as a result of the closing price of RMR Inc.’s class A common stock being lower than our carrying amount per RMR Inc. share on the distribution date. See Note 13 for information regarding the fair value of our investment in RMR Inc. as of December 31, 2015.

On December 15, 2015, RMR Inc. paid a cash dividend to holders of its class A common stock and class B-1 common stock as of November 25, 2015 of $0.5260 per share to cover the period from and including June 5, 2015 up to but not including December 14, 2015.  As a result of our ownership of class A common stock of RMR Inc., we received a cash dividend of $2,640 from RMR Inc.

The transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement and the terms thereof were negotiated and reviewed by a Joint Special Committee comprised solely of our Independent Trustees and the independent trustees of the Other REITs, or the Joint Special Committee, and were separately approved and adopted by our Independent Trustee who did not serve as an independent trustee of any of the Other REITs, by a Special Committee of our Board of Trustees, comprised solely of our Independent Trustees, or our Special Committee, and by our Board of Trustees. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC acted as financial advisor to the Joint Special Committee and Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc. acted as financial advisor to our Special Committee.

Accounting for Investment in RMR Inc.:  We concluded, for accounting purposes, that the cash and share consideration of $55,922 we paid for our investment in 5,019,121 shares of class A common stock of RMR Inc. represented a discount to the fair value of these shares.  We initially accounted for this investment under the cost method of accounting and recorded this investment at its estimated fair value of $129,722 as of June 5, 2015, using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy under GAAP.  As a result, we recorded a liability for the amount by which the estimated fair value exceeded the price we paid for these shares and we are amortizing this amount as described below. As of December 31, 2015, the unamortized balance of this liability was $71,762.  This liability for our investment in class A common stock of RMR Inc. is included in accounts payable and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet and is being amortized on a straight line basis through December 31, 2035, the 20 year term of the business and property management agreements with RMR LLC entered on June 5, 2015, as an allocated reduction to business management fees and property management fees, which are included in general and administrative in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Amortization of this liability, which is included in general and administrative expense and other operating expenses, for the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $2,038.

Management Agreements with RMR LLC:  For 2013, our business management agreement provided for the base business management fee to be paid to RMR LLC at an annual rate equal to the sum of (a) 0.5% of the historical cost of the real estate assets acquired from a REIT to which RMR LLC provided business management or property management services, or the Transferred Assets, plus (b) with respect to other properties we acquired excluding the Transferred Assets, 0.7% of our aggregate cost of those properties up to and including $250,000, and 0.5% thereafter.  In addition, for 2013, our business management agreement also provided for RMR LLC to be paid an incentive fee equal to 15% of the product of (i) the weighted average of our common shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis during a fiscal year and (ii) the excess, if any, of the Normalized FFO Per Share, as defined in that business management agreement, for such fiscal year over the Normalized FFO Per Share for the preceding fiscal year.  This incentive fee was payable in common shares and it was subject to a cap on the value of the incentive fee being no greater than $0.02 per share of our total shares outstanding.

On December 23, 2013, we and RMR LLC amended and restated our business management agreement, effective with respect to services performed on or after January 1, 2014.  After these amendments, our business management agreement provides that:

·

Revised Base Management Fee.  The annual amount of the base management fee to be paid to RMR LLC by us for each applicable period is equal to the lesser of:

 

o

the sum of (a) 0.7% of the average aggregate historical cost of our real estate investments up to $250,000, plus (b) 0.5% of the average historical cost of our real estate investments exceeding $250,000; and

 

o

the sum of (a) 0.7% of the average closing price per share of our common shares on the NYSE, during such period, multiplied by the average number of our common shares outstanding during such period, plus the daily weighted average of the aggregate liquidation preference of each class of our preferred shares outstanding during such period, plus the daily weighted average of the aggregate principal amount of our consolidated indebtedness during such period, or, together, our Average Market Capitalization, up to $250,000, plus (b) 0.5% of our Average Market Capitalization exceeding $250,000.

The average aggregate historical cost of our real estate investments includes our consolidated assets invested, directly or indirectly, in equity interests in or loans secured by real estate and personal property owned in connection with such real estate (including acquisition related costs and costs which may be allocated to intangibles or are unallocated), all before reserves for depreciation, amortization, impairment charges or bad debts or other similar noncash reserves.

 

·

Revised Incentive Fee.  The incentive fee which may be earned by RMR LLC for an annual period is an amount, subject to a cap based on the value of our outstanding common shares, equal to 12% of the product of (a) our equity market capitalization on the last trading day on the year immediately prior to the relevant measurement period and (b) the amount (expressed as a percentage) by which the total returns per share realized by the holders of our common shares (i.e., share price appreciation plus dividends) exceeds the total shareholder return of the SNL US REIT Hotel Index (in each case subject to certain adjustments) for the relevant measurement period. The measurement periods are generally three-year periods ending with the year for which the incentive fee is being calculated, with shorter periods applicable in the case of the calculation of the incentive fee for 2014 (one year) and 2015 (two years).  The terms of the revised incentive fee were developed by our Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of Independent Trustees, in consultation with FTI Consulting, Inc., a nationally recognized compensation consultant experienced in REIT compensation programs.

 

·

Partial Payment in Common Shares.  The base management fee would be paid monthly to RMR LLC, 90% in cash and 10% in our common shares, which are fully vested when issued.  The number of our common shares to be issued in payment of the base management fee for each month would equal the value of 10% of the total base management fee for that month divided by the average daily closing price of our common shares during that month.  The incentive fee would be payable in our common shares, with one-third of our common shares issued in payment of an incentive fee vested on the date of issuance, and the remaining two-thirds vesting thereafter in two equal annual installments.  All common shares issued in payment of the incentive fee would be fully vested upon termination of the business management agreement, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, RMR LLC would, in certain circumstances, be required to return to us or forfeit some or all of the common shares paid or payable to it in payment of the incentive management fee.  RMR LLC and certain eligible transferees of our common shares issued in payment of the base management fee or incentive fee would be entitled to demand registration rights, exercisable not more frequently than twice per year, and to “piggy-back” registration rights, with certain expenses to be paid by us. We and applicable selling shareholders also indemnify each other (and their officers, trustees, directors and controlling persons) against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  in connection with any such registration.

 

·

Elimination of Right of First OfferThe right of first offer was eliminated.  This right of first offer had required that, with certain exceptions, if we determined to offer for sale or other disposition any real property that, at such time, is of a type within the investment focus of another REIT to which RMR LLC provides management services, we would first offer that property for purchase or disposition to that REIT and negotiate in good faith for such purchase or disposition.  Under our business management agreement, we acknowledge that RMR LLC may engage in other activities or businesses and act as the manager to any other person or entity (including other REITs) even though such person or entity has investment policies and objectives similar to ours and we are not entitled to preferential treatment in receiving information, recommendations and other services from RMR LLC.

We lease office space to RMR LLC in the office building we own in Baltimore, MD for RMR LLC’s property management office. Pursuant to our lease agreement with RMR LLC, we recognized rental income from RMR LLC for leased office space of approximately $33 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our office space lease with RMR LLC is terminable by RMR LLC if our management agreements with RMR LLC are terminated.

Our property management agreement with RMR LLC provides for management fees equal to 3.0% of gross collected rents and construction supervision fees equal to 5.0% of construction costs for the one office property that is subject to that agreement.

On May 9, 2014, we and RMR LLC entered into the following amendments to our business management agreement and property management agreement:

·

Revised RMR LLC Termination Right.  RMR LLC’s right to terminate the business management and property management agreements was changed to 120 days’ written notice from the previous 60 days’ written notice for the business management agreement and five business days’ notice if we underwent a change of control for the property management agreement.

 

·

RMR LLC Termination Fee.  We agreed that if we terminate or elect not to renew the business management agreement other than for cause, as defined, we would pay RMR LLC a termination fee equal to 2.75 times the sum of the annual base management fee and the annual internal audit services expense, which amounts are based on averages during the 24 consecutive calendar months prior to the date of notice of nonrenewal or termination.  In addition, we agreed that if we terminate or elect not to renew the property management agreement other than for cause, as defined, within 12 months prior to or following our giving notice of termination or non-renewal of the business management agreement other than for cause, we would pay RMR LLC a termination fee equal to 12 times the average monthly property management fee for the six months prior to the effective date of the nonrenewal or termination.

 

·

Transitional Services.  RMR LLC agreed to provide certain transition services to us for 120 days following an applicable termination by us or notice of termination by RMR LLC, including cooperating with us and using commercially reasonable efforts to facilitate the orderly transfer of the management and real estate investment services provided under the business management agreement and to facilitate the orderly transfer of management of the managed properties, as applicable.

As part of the Up-C Transaction described above, on June 5, 2015, we and RMR LLC amended and restated our business management agreement and our property management agreement.  As a result of these amendments, effective as of June 5, 2015:

·

Extended Term. Our management agreements have terms that end on December 31, 2036, and automatically extend on December 31st of each year for an additional year, so that the terms of the agreements thereafter end on the 20th anniversary of the date of the extension.

 

·

Payment of Fees in Cash.  All base management and incentive fees under our management agreements are payable in cash.

 

·

Revised Termination Rights.  We have the right to terminate each management agreement: (i) at any time on 60 days’ written notice for convenience, (ii) immediately upon written notice for cause, as defined therein, (iii) on 60 days’ written notice given within 60 days after the end of an applicable calendar year for a performance reason, as defined therein, and (iv) by written notice during the 12 months following a change of control of RMR LLC, as defined therein, RMR LLC has the right to terminate the management agreements for good reason, as defined therein.

 

·

Revised Termination Fee.  If we terminate one or both of our management agreements for convenience, or if RMR LLC terminates one or both of our management agreements for good reason, as defined therein, we have agreed to pay RMR LLC a termination fee in an amount equal to the sum of the present values of the monthly future fees, as defined therein, for the terminated management agreement(s) for the remaining term prior to the termination, which depending on the time of termination would be between 19 and 20 years.  If we terminate one or both of our management agreements for a performance reason, as defined therein, we have agreed to pay RMR LLC the termination fee calculated as described above, but assuming a remaining term of 10 years prior to the termination.  We are not required to pay any termination fee if we terminate our management agreements for cause, as defined therein or as a result of a change of control of RMR LLC, as defined therein.

Our Board of Trustees has given our Compensation Committee, which is comprised exclusively of our Independent Trustees, authority to act on our behalf with respect to our management agreements with RMR LLC.  Our Governance Guidelines and the charter of our Compensation Committee together require the committee to annually review the terms of these agreements, evaluate RMR LLC’s performance under the agreements and determine whether to terminate the management agreements.

The 2013 and 2014 amendments to the business and property management agreements described above were negotiated, reviewed, approved and adopted by our Compensation Committee and the 2015 amendments to the business and property management agreements described above were negotiated and reviewed by the Joint Special Committee, and were approved and adopted by our Compensation Committee.

RMR LLC Management Fees and Reimbursements:  Pursuant to our business management agreement and property management agreement with RMR LLC, we recognized business management and property management fees of $37,364,  $37,672 and $41,474 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The business management and property management fees we recognized for 2015, 2014 and 2013 are included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated financial statements.  The business management fee recognized for 2015 reflects a reduction of $2,038 for the amortization of the liability we recorded in connection with the Up-C Transaction, as further described above under “—Accounting for Investment in RMR Inc.”  In accordance with the terms of our business management agreement, we issued, in aggregate, 52,366 of our common shares to RMR LLC as payment for a portion of the base business management fee we recognized for the period from January 1, 2015 to June 5, 2015 and 119,664 of our common shares to RMR LLC as payment for a portion of the base business management fee we recognized for 2014.  In January 2016, we paid an incentive fee of $62,263 to RMR LLC pursuant to our business management agreement. No incentive fee was payable to RMR LLC under our business management agreement for 2014. In March 2014, we issued 102,536 of our common shares to RMR LLC for the incentive fee for 2013, pursuant to our business management agreement.

We are generally responsible for all of our operating expenses, including certain expenses incurred by RMR LLC on our behalf.  Our property level operating costs are generally incorporated into rents charged to our tenants, including certain payroll and related costs incurred by RMR LLC.  The total of these property management related reimbursements paid to RMR LLC for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $134,  $75 and $68, respectively, and these amounts are included in property operating expenses in our consolidated financial statements for these periods.  We are generally not responsible for payment of RMR LLC’s employment, office or administration expenses incurred to provide management services to us, except for the employment and related expenses of RMR LLC employees assigned to work exclusively or partly for the one office building which is the subject of the property management agreement, our share of the wages, benefits and other related costs of centralized accounting personnel and our share of the staff employed by RMR LLC who perform our internal audit function.

We have historically awarded share grants to certain RMR LLC employees under our equity compensation plan.  During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we made annual share grants to RMR LLC employees of 76,250,  79,725 and 84,125 of our common shares, respectively.  Those grants had aggregate values of $1,957,  $2,272 and $2,307, respectively, based upon the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the dates of grant. One fifth of those restricted shares vested on the grant dates and one fifth vests on each of the next four anniversaries of the grant dates. These share grants to RMR LLC employees are in addition to the fees we paid RMR LLC.  In September 2015, we purchased 16,340 of our common shares, at the closing price for our common shares on the NYSE on the date of purchase, from certain of our officers and other employees of RMR LLC in satisfaction of tax withholding and payment obligations in connection with the vesting of awards of restricted common shares.  In addition, under our business management agreement we reimburse RMR LLC for our allocable costs for internal audit services, which amounts are subject to approval by our Compensation Committee.  Our Audit Committee appoints our Director of Internal Audit.  The aggregate amounts accrued for share grants to RMR LLC employees and internal audit costs for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $2,284,  $2,523 and $2,276, respectively, and these amounts are included in our general and administrative expenses for these periods.

On occasion, we have entered into arrangements with former employees of RMR LLC in connection with the termination of their employment with RMR LLC, providing for the acceleration of vesting of restricted shares previously granted to them under our equity compensation plan.  Additionally, each of our executive officers received grants of restricted shares of other companies to which RMR LLC provides management services, including TA, in their capacities as officers of RMR LLC.

Pursuant to our business management agreement, RMR LLC may from time to time negotiate on our behalf with certain third party vendors and suppliers for the procurement of goods and services to us.  As part of this arrangement, we may enter agreements with RMR LLC and other companies to which RMR LLC provides management services for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms from such vendors and suppliers.

Sonesta.  In January 2012, pursuant to a series of transactions, we acquired entities that owned the Royal Sonesta Hotel Boston in Cambridge, MA, or the Cambridge Hotel, and had leasehold interests in the Royal Sonesta Hotel New Orleans in New Orleans, LA, or the New Orleans Hotel for approximately $150,500. In connection with these transactions, we entered hotel management agreements with Sonesta that provide for Sonesta to manage for us each of the Cambridge Hotel and the New Orleans Hotel. Since that time, we have rebranded additional hotels that we own to Sonesta brands and management, and as of December 31, 2015, Sonesta was managing 31 of our hotels pursuant to long-term management agreements. We currently lease all hotels that we own and which are managed by Sonesta to one of our TRSs.  The stockholders of Sonesta are Mr. Barry Portnoy and Mr. Adam Portnoy, who are our Managing Trustees, and they also serve as directors of Sonesta. Sonesta’s Chief Executive Officer is an officer of RMR LLC and other officers and employees of Sonesta are former employees of RMR LLC.  RMR LLC also provides certain services to Sonesta.

The management agreements for our full service hotels managed by Sonesta provide that we are paid a fixed minimum return equal to 8% of our invested capital, as defined in the management agreements, if gross revenues of the hotel, after payment of hotel operating expenses and management and related fees to Sonesta (other than the incentive fee described below, if applicable), are sufficient to do so. We are to be paid an additional amount based upon the hotel’s operating profit, as defined in the management agreements, after payment of Sonesta’s incentive fee, if applicable. After payment of specified hotel operating expenses from the hotel’s gross revenues, Sonesta is entitled to receive a base management fee equal to 3% of gross revenues. Additionally, under the management agreements, Sonesta is entitled to a reservation fee equal to 1.5% of gross room revenues, as defined in the management agreements, a system fee for centralized services of 1.5% of gross revenues, a procurement and construction supervision fee in connection with renovations equal to 3% of third party costs and an incentive fee equal to 20% of the hotel’s operating profit after reimbursement to us and to Sonesta of certain advances, and payment to us of our minimum returns. The management agreements expire in January 2037, and will be extended automatically for up to two successive 15 year renewal terms unless Sonesta elects not to renew the management agreements. We have the right to terminate the management agreements after three years without cause upon payment of a termination fee. We also have the right to terminate the management agreements without a termination fee if our minimum return is less than 6% of our invested capital during any three of four applicable consecutive years. Both we and Sonesta have the right to terminate the management agreements upon a change of control, as defined in the management agreements, of the other party, and under certain other circumstances which, in the case of termination by Sonesta, may require the payment of a termination fee. Under the management agreements, the termination fee is an amount equal to the present value of the payments that would have been made to Sonesta between the date of termination and the scheduled expiration date of the agreements’ current term as a base fee, reservation fee, system fee and an incentive fee, each as defined in the management agreements, if the agreements had not been terminated, calculated based upon the average of each of such fees earned in each of the three years ended prior to the date of termination and discounted at an annual rate equal to 8%. The management agreements for our limited service hotels managed by Sonesta are substantially the same as the management agreements for our full service Sonesta managed hotels, except that the base management fee payable to Sonesta is 5% of gross revenues and our required working capital advance per room is less for the limited service hotels. Our agreements with Sonesta include arbitration provisions for the resolution of disputes.

In April 2012, we entered into a pooling agreement with Sonesta that combined our hotel management agreements with Sonesta for purposes of calculating gross revenues, payment of hotel operating expenses, payment of fees and distributions and the calculation of minimum returns due to us. We previously referred to this agreement and combination of hotels and management agreements as our Sonesta No. 1 agreement. The management agreements for all of our hotels managed by Sonesta, excluding, until June 28, 2013, the New Orleans Hotel, are included in the Sonesta No. 1 agreement. The amended and restated management agreement we entered with Sonesta for the New Orleans Hotel upon our acquiring the fee interest in that hotel (further described below) was added to our pooling agreement with Sonesta. We now refer to the pooling agreement and combination of our Sonesta branded hotels and management agreements as our Sonesta agreement. See Note 6 for further information about our management and pooling agreements with Sonesta.

Pursuant to our management agreements with Sonesta, we incurred management, system, reservation fees and reimbursement of certain guest loyalty, marketing program and third party reservation transmission expenses payable to Sonesta of $21,482,  $17,800 and $10,902 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.  These amounts are included in hotel operating expenses in our consolidated financial statements. In addition, we also incurred procurement and construction supervision fees payable to Sonesta in connection with capital expenditures at our hotels managed by Sonesta of $1,607,  $3,309 and $2,976 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.  These amounts have been capitalized in our consolidated financial statements.  Under our hotel management agreements with Sonesta, routine property maintenance, which is expensed, is an operating expense of the hotels and improvements and periodic renovations, which are capitalized, are funded by us, except in the case of the New Orleans Hotel for capital expenditures incurred prior to June 28, 2013, which were borne in large part by the former lessor. At December 31, 2015, we owed Sonesta $3,968 for capital expenditure reimbursements and for a previously estimated overpayment of minimum returns advanced.  At December 31, 2014, we owed Sonesta $5,250 for capital expenditure reimbursements.  Amounts due from Sonesta are included in due from related persons and amounts owed to Sonesta are included in due to related persons on our consolidated balance sheets, respectively.

Under our management agreements with Sonesta, the costs of advertising, marketing, promotional and public relations programs and campaigns, including “frequent stay” rewards programs, that are allocated and intended for the benefit of the Sonesta hotels we own, incurred by Sonesta are subject to reimbursement by us or otherwise treated as operating expenses of our hotels, subject to our approval of the applicable marketing program and cost allocation. Sonesta has developed a guest loyalty program and marketing program for the Sonesta hotels. Our Board of Trustees and Independent Trustees agreed, effective July 1, 2013, to our reimbursement to Sonesta for these programs at rates not to exceed: 1.0% of the applicable hotel’s room revenues for the Sonesta guest loyalty program; 1.0% of the total revenues from our Sonesta managed hotels for the Sonesta marketing program; and 0.8% of the applicable hotel’s room revenues for Sonesta’s third party reservation transmission expenses.

In May 2013, we acquired a full service hotel in Duluth, GA and this hotel has been branded a Sonesta hotel, Sonesta Gwinnett Place. Sonesta is managing this hotel pursuant to a management agreement on terms consistent with our other applicable management agreements with Sonesta. This management agreement was added to our Sonesta agreement.

On June 28, 2013, we acquired the fee interest in the New Orleans Hotel from the third party owner from which we previously leased that hotel and, as a result, the lease with the third party terminated. Simultaneous with this acquisition, we and Sonesta amended and restated the prior management agreement we had with Sonesta for this hotel. The terms of the amended and restated management agreement are substantially the same as those contained in our other management agreements with Sonesta relating to full service hotels. Prior to our acquisition of the fee interest in the New Orleans Hotel, the annual rent payable by us under the prior lease for the New Orleans Hotel was calculated as 75% of the sum of the net profit of the hotel (hotel operating revenues less hotel operating expenses, including a 3% management fee to Sonesta), less capital expenditures made during the lease year. The management agreement for the New Orleans Hotel as in effect prior to our acquisition of the fee interest in the New Orleans Hotel, provided that we were paid all cash flow of the hotel after the payment of operating expenses, including a management fee to Sonesta and rent expense.

On April 29, 2014, we sold our Sonesta ES Suites in Myrtle Beach, SC. In connection with this sale, the hotel management agreement with Sonesta for this property was terminated and this property was removed from our Sonesta agreement.

On May 30, 2014, we acquired a hotel in Ft. Lauderdale, FL and this hotel has been rebranded as a Sonesta hotel. Sonesta is managing this hotel pursuant to a management agreement on terms consistent with our other management agreements with Sonesta and that management agreement was added to our Sonesta agreement.

On April 28, 2015, we acquired a building and land parcel adjacent to a hotel we own which is managed by Sonesta for $750, excluding acquisition related costs. This land was added to that hotel property and constitutes part of our invested capital used to calculate our minimum returns under our Sonesta agreement.

On July 23, 2015, we acquired a portfolio of nine extended stay hotels with 1,095 suites located in eight states for $85,000, excluding acquisition related costs. In connection with this acquisition, we entered into a long term management agreement for Sonesta to manage these hotels. The terms of the management agreement are substantially consistent with the terms of our other management agreements with Sonesta for extended stay hotels, and this management agreement was combined with our other Sonesta hotel management agreements under our existing pooling agreement with Sonesta. We expect to invest approximately $45,000 to substantially renovate these hotels in connection with their conversion to the upscale, extended stay Sonesta ES Suites® hotel brand.

On January 4, 2016, we and Sonesta amended our pooling agreement and management agreements.  A hotel under the pooling agreement may be designated as “non-economic” and removed from the pooling agreement and subject to sale and we have an early termination right under each management agreement, in each case if the applicable hotel does not meet certain criteria for the stipulated measurement period. Pursuant to the amendment, these stipulated measurement periods begin on the later of January 1, 2017 and January 1st of the year beginning at least 18 months following the effective date of the applicable management agreement. The amendments to the pooling agreement and management agreements with Sonesta were negotiated and recommended by a Special Committee of our Board of Trustees comprised solely of our Independent Trustees, and were approved by our Independent Trustees and also by our Board of Trustees. 

On February 1, 2016, we acquired two extended stay hotels with 262 suites located in Cleveland and Westlake, OH for $12,000, excluding acquisition related costs. In connection with this acquisition, we entered into two long term management agreements for Sonesta to manage these hotels. The terms of the management agreements are substantially consistent with the terms of our other management agreements with Sonesta for extended stay hotels, and these management agreements were combined with our other Sonesta hotel management agreements under our existing Sonesta agreement.  

AIC. We, ABP Trust, TA and four other companies to which RMR LLC provides management services currently own AIC, an Indiana insurance company, and are parties to an amended and restated shareholders agreement regarding AIC. On May 9, 2014, as a result of a change in control of Equity Commonwealth, or EQC, as defined in the amended and restated shareholders agreement, we and the other AIC shareholders purchased pro rata the AIC shares EQC owned in accordance with the terms of that agreement. Pursuant to that purchase, we purchased 2,857 AIC shares from EQC for $825. Following these purchases, we and the other remaining six shareholders each owns approximately 14.3% of AIC. As of December 31, 2015, we have invested $6,034 in AIC since its formation in 2008.

All of our Trustees and all of the trustees and directors of the other AIC shareholders currently serve on the board of directors of AIC.  RMR LLC provides management and administrative services to AIC pursuant to a management and administrative services agreement with AIC.  Pursuant to this agreement, AIC pays RMR LLC a service fee equal to 3.0% of the total annual earned premiums payable under then active policies issued or underwritten by AIC or by a vendor or an agent of AIC on its behalf or in furtherance of AIC’s business.  The shareholders agreement among us, the other shareholders of AIC and AIC includes arbitration provisions for the resolution of disputes.

We and the other shareholders of AIC have historically participated in a combined property insurance program arranged by AIC providing $500,000 of coverage and with respect to which AIC is a reinsurer of certain coverage amounts.  In June 2015, we and the other shareholders of AIC renewed our participation in this program.  In connection with that renewal, we purchased a three year combined property insurance policy providing $500,000 of coverage annually with the premiums to be paid annually and a one year combined policy providing certain other coverage for our properties. Our annual premiums for this property insurance were $4,099,  $11,851 and $6,842 as of the renewal of the policies in June 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.  The premiums are adjusted throughout the policy years for property acquisitions or dispositions we make.  Although we own less than 20% of AIC, we use the equity method to account for this investment because we believe that we have significant influence over AIC as all of our Trustees are also directors of AIC. Our investment in AIC had a carrying value of $6,834,  $6,834 and $5,913 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which amounts are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.  We recognized income of $20,  $94 and $334 related to our investment in AIC for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

We periodically consider the possibilities for expanding our insurance relationships with AIC to include other types of insurance and may in the future participate in additional insurance offerings AIC may provide or arrange. We may invest additional amounts in AIC in the future if the expansion of this insurance business requires additional capital, but we are not obligated to do so.

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance. We, RMR Inc. and certain companies to which RMR LLC provides management services participate in a combined directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy.  This combined policy currently provides for $10,000 of combined primary coverage and expires in September 2017.  In August 2015, we also obtained separate non-combined directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies providing $20,000 of aggregate excess coverage plus $5,000 of excess non-indemnifiable coverage, which policies expire in September 2016.  We paid aggregate premiums of $463,  $624 and $624 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, for these policies.  The premiums for the combined policies were allocated among the insured companies after consultation with the insurance broker and approval by each company’s board and independent trustees or directors as applicable.