DEF 14A 1 thg-def14a_20210511.htm DEF 14A thg-def14a_20210511.htm

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.           )

Filed by the Registrant

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 


 


 

 

The Hanover Insurance Group® ADAPT INNOVATE THRIVE Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 11, 2021

 


 

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.

440 Lincoln Street

Worcester, Massachusetts 01653

Letter to our Shareholders from Cynthia L. Egan, Chair of our Board, and
John C. Roche, our President and Chief Executive Officer

March 26, 2021

TO OUR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS:

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. to be held on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern time, in a virtual, online meeting format. While we would prefer to hold our Annual Meeting in person at the Company’s headquarters in Worcester, Massachusetts, due to the ongoing public health impacts of COVID-19, we believe that holding an in-person Annual Meeting would pose a risk to the health and safety of our shareholders, employees, and directors. Please see the notice on the following page for additional information about the meeting and how to register to attend.

The accompanying Notice and Proxy Statement describe in detail the matters to be acted on at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement also describes the corporate governance policies and practices that foster the Board’s effective oversight of the Company’s business, risks and conduct for the long-term benefit of our stakeholders. The Board, on behalf of our shareholders, is actively engaged in the governance, audit and compensation matters addressed in this Proxy Statement.

Your vote is important to us. We hope you will vote as soon as possible. Please review the instructions concerning each of your voting options described in this Proxy Statement. Your cooperation will assure that your shares are voted and will also greatly assist us in preparing for the Annual Meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, the executive leadership team and all our employees, we would like to thank you for your investment and continued support of The Hanover Insurance Group.

Sincerely,

Cynthia L. Egan

Chair of the Board of Directors

and Independent Presiding Director

John C. Roche

President, Chief Executive Officer

and Director

 

 


 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 11, 2021

 

To the Shareholders of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.:

Set forth below are details regarding the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.:

LOCATION: Virtual, online meeting - registration available until 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on Friday, May 7, 2021 at www.proxydocs.com/THG

 

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern time

 

ITEMS OF BUSINESS: 1.  The election of five individuals to the Board of Directors; 2.  The advisory approval of the Company's executive compensation; 3.  The ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the Company's independent, registered public accounting firm for 2021; and 4.  Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

RECORD DATE: The Board of Directors has fixed March 15, 2021 as the record date for determining the shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

CHARLES F. CRONIN

Senior Vice President and Secretary

Worcester, Massachusetts

March 26, 2021

 

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting, you are requested to vote your shares. Please follow the voting instructions set forth in the Proxy Statement. If you attend the Annual Meeting and desire to withdraw your proxy and vote at the meeting, you may do so.

 

 

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 11, 2021: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxydocs.com/THG.

 


 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

i

 

 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT PROXY MATERIALS AND THE ANNUAL MEETING

1

What is included in these proxy materials?

1

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

1

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

1

What are the voting rights of the holders of the Company’s common stock?

1

Who is soliciting my vote?

1

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

1

How many shares are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

1

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

1

How do I vote?

1

How do I vote by proxy?

1

Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy?

2

What vote is required to approve each item, and how are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

2

What happens if a director nominee is not elected at the Annual Meeting?

2

How do participants in The Hanover Insurance Group Employee Stock Purchase Plan vote their shares?

2

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

2

How can I submit questions for consideration at the Annual Meeting?

3

 

 

COMPANY STOCK OWNERSHIP

4

Stock Ownership by the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers

4

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Named Executive Officers and Directors

4

Largest Owners of the Company’s Stock

6

 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

7

Director Nominees

7

Directors Continuing in Office

9

Board Profile and Diversity

11

Director Independence

12

Related-Person Transactions

12

Board Leadership Structure

13

Board Meetings and Attendance

13

Board Committees

14

Consideration of Director Nominees

16

Communicating with the Board

17

Director Compensation

17

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

19

Director Retirement Policy

19

Code of Conduct

19

Shareholder Engagement

19

ESG, Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility

20

 

 

ITEM I—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

22

 

 

ITEM II—ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

23

 

 

ITEM III—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

24

Fees Incurred from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

24

Fees and Pre-Approval Policy

24

Audit Committee Report

25

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

26

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

26

Compensation Committee Report

42

Summary Compensation Table

43

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Last Fiscal Year

45

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

47

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2020

49

Retirement Benefits

49

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

50

CEO Pay Ratio

54

 

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

55

 

 

HOUSEHOLDING INFORMATION

55

 

 

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

55

 

 

OTHER MATTERS

55

 

 

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

55

 

 

APPENDIX A—EXCERPT FROM CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

A-1

 

 

APPENDIX B—NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

B-1

 

 


 

 

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary provides highlights of the important information contained elsewhere in our Proxy Statement. It does not contain all of the information you should consider. We encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement before voting.

 

 

GENERAL INFORMATION (see pages 1 – 6) Meeting: Annual Meeting of Shareholders Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Time: 9:00 a.m., Eastern time Location: Virtual, online meeting - registration available until 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on Friday, May 7, 2021 at www.proxydocs.com/THG Record Date: March 15, 2021 Common Stock Outstanding: 36,380,506 shares Voting: One vote per share of Common Stock Registrar & Transfer Agent: Computershare Limited Corporate Website: www.hanover.com Investor Relations: www.hanover.com – under “Investors” Annual Report: www.hanover.com – under “Investors – Annual Reports” Corporate Responsibility Website: www.hanover.com – under “Why The Hanover – ESG overview” EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (see pages 26 – 54) 2020 Company Highlights: net income of $358.7 million repurchased approximately 2.2 million shares of our Common Stock for approximately $212.8 million book value per share increased 15.8% increased ordinary quarterly dividend by 7.7% no material mid-year changes to executive compensation programs or awards due to COVID-19 Principal Components of Executive Compensation: Annual base salary Short-term incentive comp Long-term incentive comp Significant Compensation Practices: Multi-year vesting for long-term awards Significant stock ownership requirements for directors/officers “Double trigger” for change in control benefits Clawback policy Prohibition on pledging/hedging Company stock Limited perquisites Cap on payouts under variable incentive compensation programs No “280G tax gross ups” for payments to executive officers under the Employment Continuity Plan History of not re-pricing stock options CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (see pages 7 – 21) Director Nominees: (each for a three-year term expiring in 2024, except as noted) Harriett “Tee” Taggart – Independent (for a two-year term expiring in 2023); Kevin J. Bradicich – Independent; J. Paul Condrin III – Independent; Cynthia L. Egan – Independent; and Kathleen S. Lane – Independent. Director Election Standard: Majority of votes cast Current Board Composition: 13 members (12 independent) Board Meetings in 2020: 10 Standing Board Committees (Meetings in 2020): Committee of Independent Directors (6); Audit (14); Compensation and Human Capital (8); Nominating and Corporate Governance (6) Board Leadership: Separate CEO and Chair Board Communications: Mail: The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. Board of Directors, Attn: Corporate Secretary 440 Lincoln Street, Worcester, MA 01653 Web: www.HanoverAlertLine.com Phone: 1-800-533-2547 Code of Conduct: www.hanover.com under “Why The Hanover—Our Governance—Company Policies—Code of Conduct Policy” MATTERS TO BE VOTED ON Agenda Item Board Recommendation See Pages 1. Election of five director nominees FOR each nominee 22 2. Advisory vote on executive compensation FOR 23 3. Ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent, registered public accounting firm for 2021 FOR 24-25

 

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     i


 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

We have made these proxy materials available to you on or about March 26, 2021 via the Internet or, at your request, forwarded paper copies by mail, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. (“THG” or the “Company”) for use at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 11, 2021 (the “Annual Meeting” or “Meeting”). In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) by mail, you will not receive a paper copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. The Notice instructs you on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet. The Notice also instructs you on how to vote your shares via the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT PROXY MATERIALS AND THE ANNUAL MEETING

What is included in these proxy materials? These proxy materials include our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting and our Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Annual Report”), including our financial statements and the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) thereon. The Annual Report is neither a part of this Proxy Statement nor incorporated herein by reference. If you requested a paper copy of these materials by mail, these materials also include the proxy card for submitting your vote prior to the Annual Meeting.

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting? At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will act on the following matters:

 

election of five directors;

 

advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation; and

 

ratification of the appointment of PwC to serve as the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm for 2021.

Any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting also will be considered. In addition, management will respond to questions from shareholders.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2021 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote at the Meeting.

What are the voting rights of the holders of the Company’s common stock? Each share of THG’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), entitles its holder to one vote.

Who is soliciting my vote? The Board is soliciting your vote at the Annual Meeting. Proxies also may be solicited on the Board’s behalf by directors, officers or employees of the Company, in person or by telephone, mail, or electronic or facsimile transmission. The Company will pay the cost of soliciting proxies, including reimbursing banks, brokerage firms and others for the reasonable expenses incurred by them for forwarding proxy material on behalf of the Board to beneficial owners of Common Stock.

How does the Board recommend that I vote? Our Board recommends you vote your shares “FOR” the election of each Board nominee and “FOR” each of the other proposals specifically identified in this Proxy Statement for action at the Annual Meeting.

How many shares are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? As of the Record Date, 36,380,506 shares of Common Stock were issued, outstanding and entitled to be voted.

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting? A quorum (a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting) must be present either in person or by proxy. Abstentions will be treated as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum and, because brokers have the discretionary authority to vote on one proposal (the ratification of auditors), broker non-votes also will be treated as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker holding shares for a beneficial owner returns a proxy but does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker does not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Banks and brokers that have not received voting instructions from their clients cannot vote on their clients’ behalf on any matter specifically identified for action at the Annual Meeting other than the ratification of the appointment of PwC to serve as the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm for 2021.

How do I vote? You may either participate in and vote at the Annual Meeting or vote by proxy without attending the Meeting.

How do I vote by proxy? If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and such brokerage firm or nominee will forward the Notice and/or a printed copy of the proxy materials to you, together with voting instructions. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee or nominee how to vote.

If you are a registered shareholder (that is, if you hold stock certificates directly in your name), you may vote via the Internet or via the toll-free number in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. If you have requested a paper copy of the proxy materials, you may vote by mail, via the Internet, or via the toll-free number in accordance with the instructions set forth on

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     1


 

the proxy card. The shares of Common Stock represented by your proxy will be voted as you directed or, if the proxy card is signed, dated and returned without instructions, in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as set forth in this Proxy Statement.

The proxy also confers discretionary authority with respect to any other proposals that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, neither the Board nor management is aware of any other matters to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, then the proxies solicited hereby will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.

Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy? Yes. Any registered shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by delivering written notice thereof to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., 440 Lincoln Street, Worcester, MA 01653. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may revoke or change your voting instructions prior to the Meeting by timely instructing your broker, trustee or nominee. Any shareholder of record participating in the Annual Meeting may vote at the Meeting regardless of whether the shareholder previously delivered a proxy. Shares held beneficially in street name by holders participating in the Annual Meeting may only vote at the meeting if you obtain and present, as part of the Meeting registration process, a legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares. Participation at the Annual Meeting by a shareholder who has submitted a proxy, however, does not in itself revoke a submitted proxy.

What vote is required to approve each item, and how are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

 

 

 

 

Proposal

Vote Required

Effect of Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions

1.   Election of a director nominee

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast (in person or by proxy). For purposes of electing directors, “the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes cast “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director.

Broker non-votes and abstentions, because they are not votes cast, are not counted for this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome.

2.   Advisory vote on executive compensation

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast (in person or by proxy).

Broker non-votes and abstentions, because they are not votes cast, are not counted for this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome.

3.   Ratification of the appointment of PwC to serve as the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm for 2021

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast (in person or by proxy).

Abstentions, because they are not votes cast, will not be counted and will have no effect on the outcome. However, banks and brokers that have not received voting instructions from their clients may vote their clients’ shares on this proposal.

 

What happens if a director nominee is not elected at the Annual Meeting? If a nominee who is currently serving as a director is not re-elected at the Annual Meeting, then, under Delaware law, the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, under our by-laws, any director who is nominated but fails to be re-elected is required to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board, effective at the end of his or her current term. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “NCGC”) will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. In making their determinations, the NCGC and the Board may consider any factors deemed relevant. The Board will act on the NCGC’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not vote on the NCGC’s recommendation or the Board’s decision. Since Ms. Lane is a nominee whose current term does not otherwise expire at the upcoming Annual Meeting, were she not to receive the requisite vote at the Annual Meeting, her tendered resignation would not be effective until the end of her current term in 2023.

How do participants in The Hanover Insurance Group Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) vote their shares?
ESPP participants who retain their issued shares are considered to hold such shares in “street name” in a brokerage account. Such shares may be voted like other “street name” holders. The brokerage firm or nominee will forward ESPP participants the Notice and/or a printed copy of the proxy materials, together with voting instructions. ESPP participants’ voting instructions are kept confidential by the administrator of the ESPP.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting? The Meeting is open to all THG shareholders of record as of the Record Date and to invited guests of the Board. Due to the ongoing global pandemic, the meeting will be held in a virtual, online meeting format; shareholders will not be able to physically attend the Annual Meeting. Registration for the Meeting will be available until 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on Friday, May 7, 2021 at www.proxydocs.com/THG. Individuals who hold shares in “street name” may be required to


THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     2


 

provide proof of their share ownership as of the Record Date to register to attend the Meeting, including the control number provided by your broker, your broker’s name, your name, and the number of THG shares held. Upon properly completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique live meeting link that will allow you access to the Annual Meeting. More information regarding how to access technical support for shareholders prior to the Meeting is available at www.proxydocs.com/THG, and for shareholders who properly register, the email containing your unique live meeting link will provide information on the technical support that will be available during the Meeting.

How can I submit questions for consideration at the Annual Meeting? Shareholders will be able to submit appropriate questions for consideration at the Annual Meeting in advance of the Meeting by visiting the Meeting registration site at www.proxydocs.com/THG. Shareholders who properly register for the Annual Meeting will also be able to submit an appropriate question or present proper business during the Meeting by making a submission through the online Meeting platform. The Rules of Conduct and Procedure for the Meeting will also be posted on www.proxydocs.com/THG. The Rules of Conduct and Procedure contain additional details on how questions and submissions for proper business will be addressed at the Annual Meeting.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     3


 

COMPANY STOCK OWNERSHIP

Stock Ownership by the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information regarding the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned as of March 12, 2021 by (i) each director of THG, (ii) the named executive officers (the “NEOs”) in the Summary Compensation Table appearing later in this Proxy Statement, and (iii) all current directors and executive officers of THG, as a group. This information has been furnished by the persons listed in the table.

 

 Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Shares Beneficially

Owned†

 

 

Percent of

Class

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Kevin J. Bradicich

 

3,981

 

 

*

 Theodore H. Bunting, Jr. (1)

 

920

 

 

*

 Jane D. Carlin

 

(2)

 

*

 J. Paul Condrin III (3)

 

241

 

 

*

 P. Kevin Condron

 

26,373

(4)

 

*

 Cynthia L. Egan

 

8,468

 

 

*

 Jeffrey M. Farber

 

197,594

(5)

 

*

 Daniel T. Henry

 

14,376

 

 

*

 Martin P. Hughes

 

2,917

 

 

*

 Dennis F. Kerrigan

 

2,885

(6)

 

*

 Wendell J. Knox

 

29,715

(7)

 

*

 Kathleen S. Lane

 

1,884

(8)

 

*

 Richard W. Lavey

 

118,385

(9)

 

*

 Joseph R. Ramrath

 

27,719

(10)

 

*

 John C. Roche

 

290,144

(11)

 

*

 Bryan J. Salvatore

 

67,150

(12)

 

*

 Harriett “Tee” Taggart

 

12,651

(10)

 

*

 Current directors and executive officers, as a group (22 persons)

 

948,828

(13)

 

2.56%

 

As to shares listed in this column, each person has sole voting and investment power, except as indicated in other footnotes to this table. Some directors have deferred receipt of certain stock grants from the Company. Deferred shares are held in a rabbi trust (the “Rabbi Trust”) by the trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. As of March 12, 2021, the Rabbi Trust held 10,551 shares of Common Stock pursuant to deferrals by directors. In accordance with regulations prescribed by the SEC, and even though such director has a direct economic interest in such deferred shares, shares held in the Rabbi Trust are not included in the amounts set forth in this column. These shares may be voted by the trustee of the Rabbi Trust, but not by the individuals on whose behalf the shares are held in the Rabbi Trust. For information regarding specific deferrals, please refer to the footnotes below.

*

Less than 1%.

(1)

Mr. Bunting joined the Board on September 1, 2020.

(2)

Excludes 5,929 shares held by the Rabbi Trust, the receipt of which Ms. Carlin has deferred.

(3)

Mr. Condrin joined the Board on February 26, 2021.

(4)

Excludes 1,648 shares held by the Rabbi Trust, the receipt of which Mr. Condron has deferred.

(5)

Includes 175,062 shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2021. Mr. Farber shares voting and investment power with his wife with respect to 2,500 shares.

(6)

Includes 2,885 shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2021.

(7)

Excludes 1,487 shares held by the Rabbi Trust, the receipt of which Mr. Knox has deferred.

(8)

Excludes 1,487 shares held by the Rabbi Trust, the receipt of which Ms. Lane has deferred.

(9)

Includes 97,841 shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2021.

(10)

Shares voting and investment power with spouse.

(11)

Includes 241,160 shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2021 and 7,652 shares held by his spouse.

(12)

Includes 57,244 shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2021.

(13)

Includes 672,045 shares underlying options exercisable within 60 days of March 12, 2021. Excludes 10,551 shares held by the Rabbi Trust. See footnotes 2 and 4-12 above.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Named Executive Officers and Directors

Named Executive Officers

Within 18 months of becoming subject to our stock ownership guidelines, each NEO, and each of our other executive officers (as well as certain other senior officers designated by the CEO) should achieve an ownership level in our Common Stock with a value equal to one times his or her base salary. Within three years of becoming subject to these guidelines, each NEO (as well as each

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     4


 

executive officer) should achieve and maintain an ownership level with a value equal to two to four times his or her base salary (four to six times base salary for the CEO and one to two times base salary for other senior officers). The guidelines credit shares held outright by the officer and by immediate family members residing in the same household, whether held individually or jointly by the officer or the immediate family member, unvested restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance-based restricted stock units (measured at target), and any shares that have been earned but the payment of which has been deferred. Regardless of their vesting status, shares subject to unexercised stock options are not counted when determining ownership under the guidelines. For these purposes, shares are valued based upon the then-current market value, or if higher, the value on the date of acquisition.

Each of our current NEOs is in compliance with the guidelines. Set forth below is a table that indicates, as of March 12, 2021, each current NEO’s share ownership as a multiple of his current base salary rate. Such figures are calculated in accordance with our stock ownership guidelines, and the multiple presented below has been determined based upon the current market value ($128.88 per share, the closing price of our Common Stock on March 12, 2021), or if higher, the value of the shares on the date of acquisition.

 

 NEO

 

Year Hired

 

Number of Shares Counted under

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

 

Ownership Level as

a Multiple of Base Salary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 John C. Roche

 

2006

 

 

109,186

 

 

 

13.7

 

 Jeffrey M. Farber

 

2016

 

 

52,941

 

 

 

9.5

 

 Richard W. Lavey

 

2004

 

 

34,265

 

 

 

7.1

 

 Bryan J. Salvatore

 

2017

 

 

21,580

 

 

 

4.8

 

 Dennis F. Kerrigan

 

2020

 

 

6,843

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

Board of Directors

Within four years from the date of first being elected to the Board, each non-employee director should achieve an ownership level in our Common Stock with a value equal to four times the value of the regular annual stock retainer paid to directors for service on the Board. This requirement can be satisfied by purchases in the open market or by holding grants received from the Company (including share grants that the director has elected to defer under Company-sponsored deferred compensation programs). The guidelines credit directors for shares held outright by the director and by his or her immediately family members residing in the same household, whether held individually or jointly by the director or the immediate family member. For these purposes, shares are valued based upon the then-current market value, or if higher, the value on the date of acquisition.

Each of our non-employee directors is in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines, or is expected to become compliant within the prescribed time following his or her initial election to the Board. Set forth below is a table that indicates, as of March 12, 2021, each director’s share ownership as a multiple of the value of the current annual stock retainer ($135,000). Such figures are calculated in accordance with our stock ownership guidelines, and the multiple presented below has been determined based upon the current market value ($128.88 per share, the closing price of our Common Stock on March 12, 2021), or if higher, the value of the shares on the date of acquisition.

 

 Non-Employee Director

 

Year First Elected to

Board

 

Number of Shares Counted

under Stock Ownership

Guidelines

 

 

Ownership Level as

a Multiple of the Value

of the Annual Stock

Retainer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Kevin J. Bradicich

 

2018

 

 

3,981

 

 

 

3.8

 

 Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.

 

2020

 

 

920

 

 

 

0.9

 

 Jane D. Carlin

 

2016

 

 

5,929

 

 

 

5.7

 

 J. Paul Condrin III

 

2021

 

 

241

 

 

 

0.2

 

 P. Kevin Condron

 

2007

 

 

28,021

 

 

 

26.8

 

 Cynthia L. Egan

 

2015

 

 

8,468

 

 

 

8.1

 

 Daniel T. Henry

 

2014

 

 

14,376

 

 

 

13.7

 

 Martin P. Hughes

 

2020

 

 

2,917

 

 

 

2.8

 

 Wendell J. Knox

 

1999

 

 

31,202

 

 

 

29.8

 

 Kathleen S. Lane

 

2018

 

 

3,371

 

 

 

3.2

 

 Joseph R. Ramrath

 

2004

 

 

27,719

 

 

 

26.5

 

 Harriett “Tee” Taggart

 

2009

 

 

12,651

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     5


 

Largest Owners of the Company’s Stock

The following table lists the only persons who, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, are “beneficial owners” (as defined by SEC regulations) of more than five percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 12, 2021.

 

 Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Shares

Beneficially

Owned

 

 

Percent of

Class

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The Vanguard Group, Inc.

 

3,743,358

(1)

 

 

10.29

%

100 Vanguard Blvd.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Malvern, PA 19355

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 BlackRock, Inc.

 

3,219,346

(2)

 

 

8.85

%

55 East 52nd Street

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New York, NY 10055

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 2021 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. that reported sole voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 3,685,840 shares, shared voting power with respect to 25,933 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 57,518 shares.

(2)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 29, 2021 by BlackRock, Inc. that reported sole voting power with respect to 3,071,103 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,219,346 shares.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     6


 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board has long been focused on and committed to responsible and effective corporate governance in order to promote sustainable, long-term shareholder value. The following section: (i) identifies our continuing directors and director nominees, highlights their qualifications, and provides a snapshot of the Board on an aggregate basis; (ii) describes the Board’s independence from management and its leadership structure; (iii) outlines the standing Board committees and their oversight responsibilities; and (iv) highlights other key aspects of our corporate governance.

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that can be found on the Company’s website at www.hanover.com under “Why The Hanover-Our Governance.” For a printed copy of the guidelines, shareholders should contact the Company’s Corporate Secretary, The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., 440 Lincoln Street, Worcester, MA 01653. Information on our website is not part of, or incorporated into, this Proxy Statement.

There are five nominees for election to the Board this year. Ms. Taggart is being nominated to serve for a two-year term expiring in 2023 to coincide with her mandatory retirement age under our director retirement policy. Mses. Egan and Lane, and Messrs. Bradicich and Condrin are each being nominated to serve for a three-year term expiring in 2024. Ms. Lane, whose current term expires in 2023, is being nominated for a three-year term in order to maintain appropriate balance in the size of each of our director classes.

Mr. P. Kevin Condron has reached mandatory retirement age under the Company's director retirement policy and, in accordance with the policy, will retire from the Board at the Annual Meeting. The Board has voted to reduce the size of the Board to twelve members, effective immediately following the Annual Meeting and the retirement of Mr. Condron.

Each Board member and nominee has served as a director since the last Annual Meeting, with the exception of Mr. Bunting, who was elected to the Board in September 2020, and Mr. Condrin, who was elected to the Board in February 2021. Mr. Bunting was identified as a potential director candidate to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “NCGC”) by Ms. Egan, who knew of Mr. Bunting’s extensive experience as a senior leader and public company director through their mutual service on another company’s board. Mr. Condrin was identified as a potential director candidate and presented to the NCGC and the Board by a third-party recruiting firm, which was engaged by the NCGC to assist the NCGC in (i) identifying director candidates that meet the Company’s Director Qualifications set forth below, (ii) coordinating interviews with those qualified candidates selected by the NCGC for further consideration, and (iii) complementing the due diligence work of the NCGC, as needed, when the NCGC conducted reference checks. Once identified as candidates, the NCGC evaluated each of Mr. Bunting and Mr. Condrin following the process described below under “Consideration of Director Nominees” on page 16, and recommended that each be elected to the Board.

Information regarding the business experience and qualifications of each nominee and continuing director is provided below. Following the individual director descriptions, we have provided the current key competencies and diversity profile of the Board on a collective basis in the section titled “Board Profile and Diversity” beginning on page 11. For a description of the skill set that the Board seeks in a director and how the individual and collective director qualifications set forth below tie to the Board’s expectations, see “Director Qualifications” on page 16.

Director Nominees

 

Kevin J. Bradicich

 

Age: 63

Director since 2018

Mr. Bradicich served as Senior Partner at McKinsey & Company, Inc. until his retirement in 2017. Mr. Bradicich began his career at McKinsey in 1983 and also held the titles of Manager, Principal and Director while with the firm. He spent the last 25 years at McKinsey focused on serving insurance company clients. While at McKinsey, Mr. Bradicich was a core member of the firm’s Global Insurance Practice’s leadership group. During his career, he also led the firm’s North American Property and Casualty Insurance Practice and helped lead the Practice’s and the firm’s people processes. We believe Mr. Bradicich’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience as a Senior Partner at McKinsey, including his 25 years of experience focused on advising boards and senior executives at global insurance company clients on all aspects of their business.

Mr. Bradicich is a member of the Audit Committee. If re-elected, Mr. Bradicich’s term will expire in 2024.

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     7


 

J. Paul Condrin III

 

Age: 59

Director since 2021

Mr. Condrin is Chair of the Board of Trustees and Interim President of Bentley University. Mr. Condrin has served on the Bentley Board of Trustees since 2013 and was named Interim President in June 2020. Before his retirement in 2018, Mr. Condrin was Executive Vice President and President, Commercial Insurance for Liberty Mutual Insurance. During his twenty-nine years at Liberty Mutual, Mr. Condrin served in other senior roles, including as President of three additional strategic business units, Corporate CFO and Corporate Comptroller. Mr. Condrin began his career at KPMG, where he specialized in serving insurance companies and higher education institutions. We believe Mr. Condrin’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his many decades of extensive experience in and knowledge of the insurance industry, including his many years of senior management experience.

If re-elected, Mr. Condrin’s term will expire in 2024.

 

Cynthia L. Egan

 

Age: 65

Director since 2015

From 2007 until her retirement in 2012, Ms. Egan was President, Retirement Plan Services for T. Rowe Price Group, a global investment management organization. From 1989 to 2007, Ms. Egan held progressively senior positions with Fidelity Investments, a multinational financial services corporation, serving as Executive Vice President, Head of Fidelity Institutional Services Company, President of the Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund, and Executive Vice President of Fidelity Management Research Co. From 2014 to 2015, she was appointed as an advisor to the U.S. Department of Treasury specializing in retirement security. Ms. Egan began her professional career at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and prior to joining Fidelity, worked at KPMG Peat Marwick and Bankers Trust Company. Ms. Egan is also a director of UNUM Corporation, a publicly traded insurance company providing group long-term disability insurance, employee benefits, individual disability insurance and special risk reinsurance, Huntsman Corporation, a publicly traded global manufacturer and marketer of differentiated and specialty chemicals, and of the BlackRock Fixed Income Funds Complex, a fund complex comprised of 110 mutual funds. From 2013 to 2016, she was a director of Envestnet, Inc., a publicly traded provider of wealth management software and services. Ms. Egan also serves as Chair of the Board of Visitors of the University of Maryland School of Medicine. We believe Ms. Egan’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her many years of management experience in the financial services industry at Fidelity and T. Rowe Price and her experience on other public company boards of directors.

Ms. Egan is Chair of the Board and Chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee. If re-elected, Ms. Egan’s term will expire in 2024.

 

Kathleen S. Lane

 

Age: 63

Director since 2018

Ms. Lane served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer at The TJX Companies, Inc. from 2008 to 2013. Prior to joining TJX, Ms. Lane was Group Chief Information Officer at National Grid plc from 2006 to 2008. In addition, she served as Chief Information Officer at the Gillette Company, GE Oil & Gas, and GE Vendor Financial Services. Ms. Lane also served as Director, Technology Services of Pepsi Cola International and began her career at The Procter & Gamble Company. Ms. Lane is also a director of Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a leading global producer of flooring products. Ms. Lane previously served as a director of EarthLink Holdings Corp., an IT services, network and communications provider, from 2013 to 2017, and of Bob Evans Farms, Inc., an operator of over 500 restaurants and a producer and distributer of food products, from 2014 to 2018. We believe Ms. Lane’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her many years of executive and management experience as a Chief Information Officer at leading companies and her experience on other public company boards of directors.

Ms. Lane is a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. If re-elected, Ms. Lane’s term will expire in 2024.

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     8


 


Harriett “Tee” Taggart

 

Age: 72

Director since 2009

Ms. Taggart currently manages a professional practice, Taggart Associates. She also serves as an endowment investment committee member, evaluating global portfolio managers and asset allocation strategies, for several major non-profit organizations. From 1983 through 2006, Ms. Taggart was a Partner, Senior Vice President and sector portfolio manager at Wellington Management LLC, a global investment company. Ms. Taggart served as a director of Albemarle Corporation, a publicly traded specialty chemical manufacturer, from 2007 until 2020 and as a trustee of the Eaton Vance Mutual Fund Complex from 2011 to 2018. Ms. Taggart is also on the boards of trustees and advisory committees of several non-profit organizations and active in a number of corporate governance organizations. We believe Ms. Taggart’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her four decades of experience in the financial services industry, as well as her executive leadership and management experience and experience with other public company boards of directors.

Ms. Taggart is a member of the Audit Committee. If re-elected, Ms. Taggart’s term will expire in 2023.

 

Directors Continuing in Office

 

Theodore H.
Bunting, Jr.

 

Age: 62

Director since 2020

Mr. Bunting most recently served as Group President, Utility Operations, at Entergy Corporation, an integrated energy company, from 2012 until his retirement in 2017. Before that, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer at Entergy from 2007 to 2012, and Chief Financial Officer of several subsidiaries from 2000 to 2007. He held other management positions of increasing responsibility in accounting and operations at Entergy since joining the company in 1983. Mr. Bunting is also a director of Unum Group, a publicly traded insurance company providing group long-term disability insurance, employee benefits, individual disability insurance and special risk reinsurance, and of NiSource Inc., one of the largest natural gas utility companies in the United States. We believe Mr. Bunting’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive accounting and operations experience, his many years of management experience while with Entergy, and his experience on the boards of other publicly traded companies.

Mr. Bunting’s term expires in 2022.

 

Jane D. Carlin

 

Age: 65

Director since 2016

Ms. Carlin has provided advisory and consultancy services to financial services companies since 2012. Prior to that, Ms. Carlin served in senior roles with leading companies, including Morgan Stanley Group Inc. and Credit Suisse Group AG. At Morgan Stanley, she held a number of leadership positions, most recently, as Managing Director, global head of financial holding company governance and assurance, from 2006 to 2012, and previously from 1987 to 2003, when she served as Managing Director and Deputy General Counsel. From 2003 to 2006, Carlin was Managing Director and global head of bank operational risk oversight at Credit Suisse. In 2010, Carlin was appointed by the U.S. Treasury Department as chair of the Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council for Critical Infrastructure Protection and Homeland Security (FSSCC) and served in that role until 2012. Prior to that, from 2009 to 2010, she served as vice chair of the FSSCC and as chair of its Cyber Security Committee. Ms. Carlin serves as a trustee of iShares Trust and iShares U.S. ETF Trust. Ms. Carlin also served as a director of PHH Corporation, a publicly traded provider of end-to-end mortgage solutions, from September 2012 until its acquisition by Ocwen Financial Corporation in October 2018. We believe Ms. Carlin’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her many years of management experience in compliance, risk oversight, and cyber security in the financial services industry, and her experience on the boards of other publicly traded companies.

Ms. Carlin is Chair of the Audit Committee.  Ms. Carlin’s term expires in 2023.

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     9


 

Daniel T. Henry

 

Age: 71

Director since 2014

Until his retirement, Mr. Henry served as Chief Financial Officer of American Express Company, a global financial services company, from 2007 to 2013. Mr. Henry joined American Express in 1990 and served in a variety of senior finance roles including Comptroller. Prior to joining American Express, Mr. Henry was a Partner with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Henry is also a director of Veritiv Corporation, a publicly traded company that provides business-to-business distribution solutions. Mr. Henry previously served as a director of Groupon, Inc., a publicly traded operator of online local marketplaces, from 2012 to 2016. We believe Mr. Henry’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience as a CFO at a major financial services company, and his experience on the boards of directors of other publicly traded companies.

Mr. Henry is a member of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee. Mr. Henry’s term expires in 2023.

 

Martin P. Hughes

 

Age: 72

Director since 2020

Mr. Hughes serves as non-executive Chair of the Board of Directors of HUB International Limited (“HUB”), a privately held insurance brokerage firm providing an array of property, casualty, risk management, life and health, employee benefits, investment, and wealth management products and services across North America. Mr. Hughes previously served as Chair and CEO of HUB from 1999 to 2018, including while it was a public, New York Stock Exchange-listed company, before its sale to private investors. In addition, Mr. Hughes was Executive Chair of HUB from 2018 to January 2020. He joined Mack and Parker, Inc., an independent insurance agency (now a part of HUB), in 1973, where he served as President from 1990 to 1999, and as Chair from 1999 to 2001. Mr. Hughes has also served as chair of both the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers, an association of the top commercial insurance and employee benefits intermediaries, as well as Assurex Global, a leading worldwide insurance services organization. We believe Mr. Hughes’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his over 40 years of experience in the insurance brokerage industry, his knowledge of both the property and casualty insurance industry and the agency and brokerage sales channel, his prior service as chief executive officer of a public company, and his many years of management and transactional experience in the insurance industry.

Mr. Hughes is a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Hughes’s term expires in 2022.

 

Wendell J. Knox

 

Age: 73

Director since 1999

Until his retirement in 2009, Mr. Knox was President and CEO of Abt Associates Inc., a policy research and business consulting firm, where he had been employed since 1969. Mr. Knox is also a director of Abt Associates Inc. and is a trustee of the Natixis and Loomis Sayles Mutual Fund Complex, a fund complex comprised of 55 funds. He also serves on the Advisory Board of Maine Pointe, LLC, a logistics and supply chain management consulting firm. We believe Mr. Knox’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience as a CEO, combined with his corporate governance expertise and experience with other boards of directors.

Mr. Knox is a member of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee. Mr. Knox’s term expires in 2023.

 

Joseph R. Ramrath

 

Age: 64

Director since 2004

Mr. Ramrath is Senior Managing Director of Colchester Partners LLC, an investment banking and strategic advisory firm that he cofounded in 2002. Mr. Ramrath was Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of the United Asset Management division of Old Mutual plc, an international financial services firm headquartered in London, England, from 2000 to 2002. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of United Asset Management Corporation from 1996 until its acquisition by Old Mutual in 2000. Earlier in his career, Mr. Ramrath was a partner at Hill & Barlow, a Boston law firm, and a certified public accountant with Arthur Andersen & Co. We believe Mr. Ramrath’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his accounting, financial and legal background, his experience as a member of management and on the board of directors with other public companies, as well as his years of experience as an advisor to investment advisory companies.

Mr. Ramrath is Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Ramrath’s term expires in 2022.

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     10


 

John C. Roche

 

Age: 57

Director since 2017

Mr. Roche became President and Chief Executive Officer in November 2017. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President and President, Hanover Agency Markets since February 2017. Until February 2017, Mr. Roche was Executive Vice President, President Business Insurance since 2013 and head of Field Operations since 2014. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, President Business Insurance from 2009 to 2013 and has held the following other positions since joining the Company in 2006: Vice President, Field Operations and Vice President, Underwriting and Product Management, Commercial Lines. From 1994 to 2006, Mr. Roche served in a variety of leadership positions at St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc., last serving as Vice President, Commercial Accounts. Previously, Mr. Roche served in a variety of underwriting and management positions at Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company and Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company. We believe Mr. Roche’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his more than twenty-five years of experience in the property and casualty insurance industry, his management experience leading significant business units both at the Company and at St. Paul Travelers and his detailed understanding of the Company and its business.

Mr. Roche’s term expires in 2022.

 

Board Profile and Diversity

The Board believes diversity among its members provides the Company a depth and breadth of insight, perspective and experience that is important to effective corporate governance and in addressing the complex challenges that the Company faces. To this end, the Board seeks members who represent a broad array of experiences and expertise in the context of the evolving needs of the Board.

The NCGC maintains a comprehensive skills and experience matrix for evaluating the background and skill set of the Board on both an individual director and collective basis. The matrix details key competencies, demographic information, and outside public company board, committee, committee chair and CEO experience. The NCGC tracks each director’s level of current and developing expertise across the key competencies in order for the Board to ensure that it can effectively oversee the long-term success of the Company and to align with the Company’s goal of being a premier property and casualty company in the independent agency channel.  

On a collective basis, the Board has expertise in the following categories of key competencies:

 

property & casualty insurance (beyond Company Board service)

 

financial services

 

mergers, acquisitions and strategic business combinations

 

finance/accounting

 

investments/capital markets

 

technology

 

senior management and talent development

 

operations

 

marketing and distribution

 

governance

On a collective basis, the demographic profile of all director nominees and directors continuing in office after the Annual Meeting is reflected below.

Independence 92% Independent (11 of 12 members) Racial/Ethnic Diversity 17% People of Color (2 of 12 members)

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     11


 

Gender Diversity 33% Female (4 of 12 members) Board Leadership Roles* 75% Female Leadership in Board Chair and Committee Chair roles (3 of 4 roles) *Ms. Egan currently holds both the Board Chair and a committee chair position

Director Independence

Under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, a member of the Board only qualifies as “independent” if the Board affirmatively determines the director has no material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines include standards to assist the Board in determining whether a director has a material relationship with the Company. The standards conform to the standards established by the NYSE. The portion of our Corporate Governance Guidelines addressing director independence is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.

Mr. Hughes serves as executive chairman of HUB, and he is a former executive and employee of HUB. We conduct regular business activities with HUB. Most significantly, HUB is one of the Company’s appointed agents, placing both commercial lines and personal lines business with us. The Board and the NCGC examined these relationships again in 2021, as well as those of an immediate family member of Mr. Hughes who is a HUB executive, in light of the independence standards adopted by the NYSE and our Corporate Governance Guidelines and concluded that Mr. Hughes is independent under these standards. This conclusion was supported by the fact that the commission amounts paid to HUB did not exceed the relevant objective thresholds set forth in the applicable independence standards, Mr. Hughes is no longer an executive or employee of HUB, and because neither Mr. Hughes nor his family member are directly or indirectly involved in any transactions with the Company or any of its subsidiaries, nor will either of their compensation be directly or indirectly impacted by such transactions.

After review by and following the recommendation of, the NCGC, the Board determined that every director and nominee for director is independent under the applicable standards, with the exception of Mr. Roche, who is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

There are no family relationships among any of the directors, director nominees or executive officers of the Company.

Related-Person Transactions

The Board has established a written procedure for the review, approval and/or ratification of “transactions with related persons” (as such term is defined by the SEC, provided that the dollar threshold for review and approval in our policy is $100,000, which is more stringent than the $120,000 threshold established by the SEC). Pursuant to such policy, any related-person transaction must be presented to the Audit Committee for review, and the Audit Committee may approve, ratify or reject the transaction. In the event management determines that it is impractical to convene an Audit Committee meeting to consummate a particular transaction, the Chair of the Audit Committee (or the Independent Presiding Director, in the event the Chair or any of his or her immediate family members is the “related person”) has the authority to approve the transaction. The Chair of the Committee, or Independent Presiding Director, as applicable, shall report to the Audit Committee at its next meeting any approval under this policy pursuant to this delegated authority. No member of the Audit Committee may participate in any approval or ratification of a transaction with respect to which such member or any of his or her immediate family members is the related person. In preparing the Company’s SEC filings and in determining whether a transaction is subject to this policy, the Company’s General Counsel is entitled to make the determination of whether a particular relationship constitutes a material interest by a related person. In evaluating a transaction with a related person, the Audit Committee shall consider all relevant facts and circumstances available to it and shall approve or ratify only those transactions that are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, as it determines in good faith.

The Company employs the daughter of Ann K. Tripp, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer of the Company and President, Opus Investment Management, Inc., who received compensation (salary and bonus) of approximately $140,000 in 2020. Ms. Tripp’s daughter does not report either directly or indirectly to Ms. Tripp, and Ms. Tripp was not involved in

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     12


 

the recruiting or hiring of this family member, or in any decisions affecting her individual compensation. Her compensation was established by the Company in accordance with its compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications and responsibilities and holding similar positions.

Although the approval of employment of a related person who works for the Company in the ordinary course of business and whose employment is consistent with the Company's policies and practices with respect to the employment of non-related persons in similar positions is not required under our policy, the Audit Committee has reviewed and approved this employment relationship. The Company and the Board are unaware of any transactions that required approval under the related-person transaction policy in 2020.

The Related Person Transaction Policy can be found on the Company’s website at www.hanover.com under “Why The Hanover—Our Governance—Company Policies.” For a printed copy of the policy, shareholders should contact the Company’s Corporate Secretary.

Board Leadership Structure

We separate the roles of CEO and Chair of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two positions.

 

Leadership Structure CEO Responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and for the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company Chair of the Board Provides guidance to the CEO, sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over shareholder meetings and meetings of the full Board

 

Additionally, we believe that separating the roles and having an independent Chair of the Board is consistent with corporate governance best practices and better supports effective management oversight and risk management. We have separated these roles since 2002. While we believe these goals can be achieved without necessarily separating the CEO and Chair designations, we also take into consideration Ms. Egan’s demonstrated skill in leading our Board and counseling management.

Ms. Egan’s duties as Chair of the Board are determined by the Board and include presiding over Board and shareholder meetings and over executive sessions of non-management directors (including the Committee of Independent Directors). The Chair of the Board may also be appointed to any committee of the Board. Ms. Egan also serves as Chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee.

It is the Board’s practice that in advance of regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings, the Chair of the Board, each Board committee chair and the CEO convene to discuss and set the agendas for the respective meetings, based principally on a review of an annual topical calendar, prior discussions among directors and current topics of interest or concern. It is Ms. Egan's practice to speak with each director following regularly scheduled Board meetings and to have other regular discussions with directors as she deems appropriate, to solicit ongoing feedback and reinforce inclusiveness and engagement. She also typically meets individually with the CEO, Chief Financial Officer, and General Counsel of the Company following each Board meeting and as she otherwise deems appropriate.

The Board generally convenes in executive session (i.e., with no members of management present) in connection with regularly scheduled Board meetings and at other times as deemed appropriate. In addition, the Board regularly meets with the Chief Executive Officer with no other members of management present. Directors have regular access to other members of senior management.

Board Meetings and Attendance

During 2020, there were ten meetings of the full Board of Directors. In addition to formal Board and committee meetings held throughout the year, directors routinely engage in communications and interactions and convene informal telephonic or in-person meetings for discussion or planning purposes. The Board routinely convenes meetings at its headquarters in Worcester, Massachusetts, and periodically convenes meetings at other locations. Due to the global pandemic, in 2020 most Board and committee meetings were held virtually through the use of videoconferencing technology so that participants could hear and see each other.

All of the directors attended at least 75% of the Board and committee meetings held in 2020 while they were members, with the exception of Mr. Condron, who was unable to attend a number of Board and committee meetings due to unanticipated personal circumstances and who is retiring from the Board at the Annual Meeting, as noted on page 19. In addition, all continuing directors

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     13


 

and director nominees are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. All the directors serving at the time were present at last year’s virtual annual meeting, with the exception of Michael D. Price, whose resignation was effective at last year’s annual meeting.

Board Committees

The standing committees of the Board consist of the Committee of Independent Directors (the “CID”), the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee (the “C&HCC”), and the NCGC. Each committee is composed solely of directors determined by the Board to be independent. The responsibilities of each of the committees are set forth in their charters, which are reviewed annually. Committee charters are available on the Company’s website, www.hanover.com, under “Why The Hanover—Our Governance—Committee Charters.” For a printed copy of any committee charter, shareholders should contact the Company’s Corporate Secretary.

The current members of the committees of the Board are:

 

 

 

 

Board Committees

Director

 

Independent

Committee of

Independent

Directors

Audit

Committee

Compensation and Human Capital

Committee

Nominating and

Corporate Governance

Committee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevin J. Bradicich

 

 

 

Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.

 

 

 

 

Jane D. Carlin

 

✓  (Chair)

 

 

J. Paul Condrin III

 

 

 

 

P. Kevin Condron

 

 

 

Cynthia L. Egan (Board Chair)

 

 

✓  (Chair)

 

Daniel T. Henry

 

 

 

Martin P. Hughes

 

 

 

Wendell J. Knox

 

 

 

Kathleen S. Lane

 

 

 

Joseph R. Ramrath

 

 

 

✓ (Chair)

Harriett “Tee” Taggart

 

 

 

Number of meetings held in 2020†

 

 

6

14

8

6

(Chair)

Denotes the Chair of the applicable committee

Does not include informal meetings held by the committees throughout the year

Committee of Independent Directors

The CID, consisting of all the independent members of the Board, discharges such responsibilities as are referred to it from time to time by the Board or one of its committees. In particular, the CID is responsible for reviewing and approving the recommendations of the C&HCC and the NCGC, as applicable, with respect to establishing performance criteria (goals and objectives) for our CEO, evaluating the CEO’s performance and approving CEO compensation. In addition to meeting the independence requirements under the NYSE regulations, each committee member participating in approving the CEO’s compensation must also meet the independence requirements under Section 16 (“Section 16”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The independent members of the Board typically meet in executive session at every scheduled Board meeting and from time-to-time meet informally or hold telephonic committee meetings. Topics of discussion at executive sessions include, among other things: the Company’s strategy, annual business plan and progress; key risks and challenges facing the Company; leadership development and succession; and other matters addressed during regular Board sessions with management.

Audit Committee

The Board has made a determination that the members of the Audit Committee satisfy the requirements of the NYSE as to independence, financial literacy and experience, and satisfy the independence requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Accordingly, the Audit Committee is independent from management. The Board has determined that Mr. Hughes is an Audit Committee financial expert and Mses. Carlin and Taggart and Mr. Bradicich are financially literate, in each case as defined by SEC regulations. The Audit Committee is, among other things, responsible for the selection and engagement, compensation, retention, evaluation, oversight and, when deemed appropriate, termination of the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee annually evaluates the performance of the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm, and determines whether to reengage it or consider other audit firms. Some of the factors considered by the Audit Committee in deciding whether to retain PwC, the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm, include:

 

PwC’s technical expertise and capabilities with respect to audit and non-audit services;

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     14


 

 

 

PwC’s depth of knowledge of the Company’s operations and businesses, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting, and PwC’s tenure as independent auditor, including the relative benefits compared to any concerns that may be associated with a longer tenure;

 

PwC’s independence and processes for maintaining its independence;

 

the quality and candor of PwC’s communications with the Audit Committee and management; and

 

the appropriateness of PwC’s fees relative to the scope and efficiency of the audit and non-audit services provided.

The committee also has oversight responsibility for the Company’s General Auditor and must approve matters related to the General Auditor’s employment and compensation. The Audit Committee generally meets in executive session separately with representatives of PwC, the Chief Financial Officer and the General Auditor, and by themselves, following regularly scheduled committee meetings. The Audit Committee also meets from time to time in executive sessions with the Company’s Chief Actuary, Chief Risk Officer and General Counsel.

The Audit Committee reviews and discusses the Company’s financial statements and earnings press releases with management and PwC prior to their release. Among its other responsibilities, as set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee reviews the arrangements for and the results of the auditor’s examination of the Company’s books and records, auditors’ compensation, internal accounting control procedures, and activities and recommendations of the Company’s internal auditors, as well as any reports relating to the integrity of our financial statements, internal financial controls or auditing matters that are reported on our anonymous Alertline. The Audit Committee also reviews the Company’s significant accounting policies, control systems, reserving practices, information security and disaster recovery programs, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, outstanding major litigation (if applicable), and major enterprise risks, as well as the resources of PwC dedicated to or otherwise supporting the Company’s audit. As noted above, the committee is also responsible for reviewing related-person transactions and assisting the Board in assessing the adequacy of the Company’s enterprise risk management program. The Audit Committee receives periodic reports regarding developments in the regulatory environment and relevant legislative reforms.

Compensation and Human Capital Committee

The C&HCC has oversight responsibility with respect to compensation matters involving directors and executive officers of THG and makes compensation decisions regarding our executive officers (other than the CEO). In conjunction with the Chair of the Board and the NCGC, the C&HCC annually reviews the CEO’s performance and other relevant external factors and makes a recommendation to the CID for the CEO’s annual compensation. It also provides general oversight of the Company’s compensation structure, including compensation plans and benefits programs applicable to all employees, and oversees a risk-based analysis of the Company’s incentive arrangements. Except to the extent reviewed by the Board, the committee is also tasked with periodically reviewing the Company’s strategies, policies, practices and experience relating to recruiting and retention, personnel practices, succession planning, corporate culture and human capital development, including policies and practices relating to inclusion and diversity (“I&D”) and pay equity.

In addition to meeting the independence requirements under the NYSE regulations, each committee member must meet the independence requirements under Section 16. Each of the members of the C&HCC satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE rules and applicable SEC requirements. The C&HCC may delegate any of its responsibilities to a subcommittee comprised of one or more of its members.

Use of Independent Outside Compensation Consultant

In executing its compensation responsibilities, the C&HCC engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“F.W. Cook”) to assist it in making compensation decisions and to provide related information and advice.

During 2020, a representative of F.W. Cook:

 

regularly attended, either in person or telephonically, C&HCC meetings;

 

periodically participated in executive sessions of the C&HCC, at which no members of management were present;

 

provided relevant market and comparative data and information;

 

provided advice regarding compensation trends and developments;

 

provided input to the C&HCC and to management regarding the selection of peer companies against which to evaluate compensation levels and practices;

 

assisted in the review and design of our director and executive compensation programs;

 

provided advice with respect to compensation decisions relating to our executive officers and directors; and

 

reviewed and provided comments to the executive compensation disclosure in this Proxy Statement.

F.W. Cook was selected by, and reports to, the C&HCC. F.W. Cook is not engaged by the Company for any other purpose, and the C&HCC reviews all compensation payable to this firm.

Pursuant to its charter, the C&HCC may select its outside compensation consultant only after taking into consideration factors relevant to that consultant’s independence, including such factors required to be considered under the listing standards of the NYSE.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     15


 

The C&HCC reviewed such factors as it deemed appropriate, including all such factors required by the NYSE listing standards, and is satisfied as to F.W. Cook’s independence from the Company and its management.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2020, our C&HCC consisted of Ms. Egan and Messrs. Henry and Knox. None of our executive officers serve, or during 2020 did serve, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any company that has one of its executive officers serving as a member of our Board or C&HCC.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The NCGC advises and makes recommendations to the Board on all matters concerning directorship and corporate governance practices and the selection of candidates as nominees for election as directors. The NCGC coordinates and oversees the Board’s evaluation of the individual directors who are eligible for re-nomination and election at each annual meeting of shareholders. The committee recommended this year’s candidates for election and, in consultation with the Chair of the Board, recommends Board member committee assignments to the full Board. The NCGC is responsible for facilitating the Board’s annual review of the performance of the CEO. The NCGC also monitors the Company’s corporate citizenship, charitable giving, sustainability and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) efforts, as well as shareholder advocacy matters.

Director Evaluation Process

The NCGC leads an annual review of the Board that examines, at the Board level and at each committee level, overall effectiveness across multiple evaluation areas, including: governance processes; Board composition and function; meeting content, structure and preparation; and management’s interaction with the Board. The NCGC facilitates discussion of the results of the assessment annually among the Board and each Board committee, with the Chair leading the process for the full Board and each committee chair leading the process for their own committee. Our evaluation process encompasses an examination of the Board as a whole, each Board committee, and each individual director whose term is expiring at the next annual meeting, to determine if that director should be re-nominated for another term. Evaluations of individual directors who are up for re-nomination include a peer review questionnaire that is completed by each of the other directors and reviewed by the Board Chair and NCGC Chair or, in instances where one of these chairs is the subject of an evaluation, by the other chair and another member of the NCGC. The NCGC considers the feedback in its assessment of individual member contributions when making its nomination recommendations to the full Board, who then make final determinations regarding Board-nominated candidates. In addition to the formal director evaluation process, the Chair solicits informal feedback from directors during her follow-up calls to each director after the conclusion of every regularly scheduled Board meeting. The Board leverages third-party software to facilitate, streamline and provide anonymity to the review process, with a view toward facilitating candor and encouraging constructive insight.

Consideration of Director Nominees

The NCGC may identify candidates for nomination to the Board through several sources, including recommendations of non-management directors, shareholders, the CEO, other executive officers, an outside search firm or other resources. Committee members review the backgrounds of candidates in light of the current needs of the Board and the key competencies discussed above, interview qualified candidates, conduct inquiries with references and review available information pertaining to the candidate’s qualifications and background.

Director Qualifications

Members of the Board and nominees for election should possess high personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders. To maintain a majority of independent directors on the Board, as required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the NCGC and the Board have a strong preference that nominees meet our independence standards. Board members and nominees should demonstrate initiative, be participatory and contribute a perspective based on practical experience and mature judgment. The Board seeks members who represent a broad array of experiences and expertise in the context of the evolving needs of the Board. While we do not have a policy in this regard, when evaluating a candidate for Board membership, the NCGC and the Board also take into consideration factors such as diversity of race, gender, ethnicity and age. In addition, without the approval of the NCGC, nominees who are CEOs (or others with similar responsibilities) should serve on no more than two other public company boards, and other nominees should serve on no more than three other public company boards. All directors and nominees for election are in compliance with this policy.

As described above under “Board Profile and Diversity” starting on page 11, the NCGC maintains a comprehensive skills and experience matrix for evaluating the background and skill set of the Board on both an individual director and collective basis. The Board seeks director candidates whose skills, experience, and expertise can augment the key competencies the NCGC and the Board have identified.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     16


 

Shareholder Nominees

The NCGC will consider qualified director candidates recommended in writing by shareholders. Shareholders who wish to suggest qualified candidates for consideration by the committee may do so by writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, giving the candidate’s name, biographical data, qualifications and evidence the candidate has agreed to serve if nominated and elected. All such submissions will be forwarded to the NCGC chair. To allow the committee sufficient time to consider a candidate in advance of an annual meeting, a shareholder should submit recommendations to the Company’s Corporate Secretary by no later than December 31st of the year prior to the annual meeting. Shareholder-proposed candidates who meet the committee’s minimum qualification standards, discussed in the preceding paragraphs, will be evaluated in the same manner as other candidates considered by the committee for Board nomination.

Pursuant to the Company’s by-laws, shareholders seeking to nominate a candidate for election to the Board without approval of the Board must deliver written notice of such nomination to the Company’s Corporate Secretary not less than 60 days or more than 90 days prior to the Annual Meeting. The notice must set forth the name, address and number of shares of THG stock held by the shareholder submitting the nomination, as well as information concerning the nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to the Exchange Act in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such nominee as a director, including a signed consent of the nominee to be named in a proxy statement and to serve as a director. In addition, the notice must be accompanied by a petition signed by at least 100 record holders of our Common Stock, representing in the aggregate at least one percent of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the election of directors.

Communicating with the Board

Shareholders and other interested parties can communicate with the Board, including the non-management directors and the Chair, by writing to The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., Board of Directors, Attn: Corporate Secretary, 440 Lincoln Street, Worcester, Massachusetts 01653, through the website www.HanoverAlertLine.com or by calling 1-800-533-2547. An independent third-party service retrieves all submissions to the website and answers all calls to the toll-free telephone number and passes the information on to our General Counsel, our Chief Financial Officer, our General Auditor and the Chair of the Audit Committee, who, when appropriate, transmit the information to the appropriate member of the Board. Communications may be anonymous or confidential. Complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will be referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee. Other concerns will be referred to the Chair of the Board. All shareholder-related complaints and concerns will be received, processed and acknowledged by the Board. Further information regarding communications with the Board may be found at the Company’s website, www.hanover.com, under “Why The Hanover—Our Governance—Contact the Board.”

Director Compensation

The C&HCC is responsible for advising the Board with respect to the Company’s director compensation practices and programs. In executing such responsibilities in 2020, the C&HCC reviewed relevant market data provided by F.W. Cook to assist it in developing compensation recommendations. The market data considered included an analysis of data from the Comparative Proxy Data Companies (for more information on these companies, please see page 30), general industry survey data from F.W. Cook’s 2019 Non-Employee Director Compensation Report (a comprehensive survey source comprised of 300 randomly selected companies from various industries categorized based on their revenue and market capitalization) and a review of recent trends and developments in director compensation. The C&HCC presented its recommendations to the full Board which, at its May meeting, made its decision for the succeeding year (beginning immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and running until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Compensation Cycle”)). In setting director compensation, the Board considered competitive pay levels in light of the amount of time directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company, as well as the level of skill and expertise the Company requires of its Board. Additionally, awards to directors under the Company’s 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) must comply with the annual limits contained in the 2014 Plan.

Based upon its review of the information provided above and the C&HCC’s recommendation, for the 2020/2021 Annual Compensation Cycle, the Board elected not to make any changes to director compensation.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     17


 

 

 Fees

 

2020/2021 Annual

Compensation Cycle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Annual Director Retainer

 

 

 

 

Stock Component (issued pursuant to the 2014 Plan)

 

$

135,000

 

Cash Component

 

$

95,000

 

 Chair of the Board Retainer

 

$

125,000

 

 Committee Chair Retainers*

 

 

 

 

NCGC

 

$

21,000

 

Compensation

 

$

25,000

 

Audit

 

$

36,000

 

 Committee Member Annual Retainer

 

 

 

 

NCGC

 

$

10,000

 

Compensation

 

$

11,000

 

Audit

 

$

15,000

 

 

*

Includes both committee chair and committee member retainer.

Additionally, the Company’s charitable foundation provides matching contributions to gifts made by directors to qualified charities, up to $5,000 per director per calendar year.

At the election of each director, (i) cash retainers may be converted to Common Stock, and (ii) cash and stock compensation may be deferred pursuant to our non-employee director deferral plan. Deferred cash amounts are accrued in a bookkeeping account that is credited with notional interest based on the so-called General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (“GATT”) rate (2.28% for 2020 and 1.62% for 2021, as determined using the November 2019 and 2020 published rates, respectively).

Mr. Roche, as an employee of the Company, receives no additional compensation for his service as a member of the Board.

Director Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the total compensation of our non-employee directors for the 2020/2021 Annual Compensation Cycle. Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts were paid in 2020.

 

 Name

 

Fees

Earned

in Cash ($)

 

Stock

Awards

($) (1)

 

All Other

Compensation

($) (2)

Total ($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Kevin J. Bradicich

 

110,055

 

 

134,945

 

 

 

245,000

 

 Theodore H. Bunting, Jr. (3)

 

66,059

 

 

93,803

 

 

 

159,862

 

 Jane D. Carlin

 

131,055

(4)

 

134,945

(4)

 

5,000

 

271,000

 

 J. Paul Condrin III (3)

 

19,591

 

 

27,799

 

 

 

47,390

 

 P. Kevin Condron

 

230,055

(4) (5)

 

134,945

(4)

 

 

365,000

 

 Cynthia L. Egan

 

230,055

(5)

 

134,945

 

 

5,000

 

370,000

 

 Daniel T. Henry

 

106,055

 

 

134,945

 

 

5,000

 

246,000

 

 Martin P. Hughes

 

66

(6)

 

244,934

(6)

 

 

245,000

 

 Wendell J. Knox

 

106,055

(4)

 

134,945

(4)

 

5,000

 

246,000

 

 Kathleen S. Lane

 

105,055

(4)

 

134,945

(4)

 

5,000

 

245,000

 

 Joseph R. Ramrath

 

116,055

 

 

134,945

 

 

5,000

 

256,000

 

 Harriett “Tee” Taggart

 

110,055

 

 

134,945

 

 

5,000

 

250,000

 

 

(1)

The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the annual stock retainer computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic No. 718. Amounts calculated are based on the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the date of grant. To the extent applicable, assumptions used in the calculation of grant date fair value amounts are included in Note 10 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 included in the Company’s Annual Report.

None of our non-employee directors held any stock options or other unvested stock-based awards as of December 31, 2020. For information on the shareholdings for our directors, please see “Stock Ownership by the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers” on page 4.

(2)

Consists of matching contributions by the Company’s charitable foundation to qualified charitable organizations.

(3)

Annual cash and stock retainers for the 2020/2021 Annual Compensation Cycle were pro-rated to reflect the fact that Messrs. Bunting and Condrin joined the Board and were paid for their Board service on September 1, 2020 and February 26, 2021, respectively.

(4)

All or a portion of this amount has been deferred at the election of the director.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     18


 

(5)

Ms. Egan received a $110,000 cash payment on December 16, 2020 to compensate her for assuming responsibilities as Chair of the Board on December 1, 2020. Mr. Condron served as Chair prior to the transition to Ms. Egan. Mr. Condron has reached mandatory retirement age under the Company's director retirement policy and, in accordance with the policy, will retire from the Board at the Annual Meeting.  

(6)

Mr. Hughes elected to convert his cash retainer to Common Stock.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk management program. The Company, being primarily in the business of risk, has established an enterprise-wide risk management group to monitor, assess, manage and mitigate material risks to the Company. The Board, directly or through its standing committees, regularly receives reports and presentations from key members of the enterprise-wide risk management group and management, including the Company’s CEO, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Information Security Officer and General Counsel on matters which, in its or management’s view, merit attention from a risk management perspective, such as catastrophe risks, counterparty risks, reserves, insured exposure aggregation levels, ex-catastrophe underwriting risk, reinsurance levels and creditworthiness of our reinsurers, the investment portfolio, litigation and regulatory matters, technology and information security, capital considerations, acquisitions, growth plans, matters relating to human capital management, leadership and succession, other operational risks, and material ESG risks. Management presentations, business updates and financial and strategic planning discussions with the Board and its committees regularly incorporate a discussion of risks and plans for mitigating or managing such risks, including emerging risks that could impact the Company’s long-term strategy.

In order to assist the Board in its responsibility to assess the adequacy of the Company’s risk management program, the Audit Committee regularly reviews with management certain financial and business risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such risk exposures, including the Company’s enterprise risk assessment and risk management policies and procedures. Throughout the year, the Audit Committee receives periodic reports from the Company’s Chief Risk Officer. The Audit Committee reports to the Board its assessment of the Company’s enterprise risk management policies and procedures.

Additionally, with respect to examining risks associated with the Company’s compensation programs, each year a committee comprised of a cross-section of officers of the Company, led by the Chief Risk Officer, conducts a review and risk assessment of the Company’s material incentive compensation plans. The results of this assessment are presented to the C&HCC in connection with the committee’s approval of the Company’s executive compensation plans for the upcoming year and are also reviewed by the committee’s independent compensation consultant. The results of the C&HCC’s risk assessment are also provided to the other members of the Board. For additional information, see “Risk Management and Compensation” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 40.

Director Retirement Policy

It is the policy of the Board that a director submit his or her resignation and retire at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders following his or her attainment of age 75. Mr. Condron has reached mandatory retirement age under the Company's director retirement policy and, in accordance with the policy, the NCGC has accepted Mr. Condron’s resignation. Mr. Condron’s resignation will be effective at the end of his current term, which expires at the Annual Meeting.

Code of Conduct

The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct that is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller. In addition, we expect our agents, contractors and others with whom we do business to act in accordance with our Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.hanover.com under “Why The Hanover—Our Governance—Company Policies—Code of Conduct Policy.” For a printed copy of the Code of Conduct, shareholders should contact the Company’s Corporate Secretary. The Company will disclose any amendments to the Code of Conduct (other than technical, administrative or non-substantive amendments), or waivers of provisions of the Code of Conduct for its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Corporate Controller, on its website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

Shareholder Engagement

In addition to regular discussions with investors and analysts, the Company engages in investor outreach throughout the year as an avenue to pursue a direct dialogue with interested shareholders in order to learn more about their perspectives, priorities and concerns. Engagement discussions with investors have traditionally included senior management and representatives from our investor relations department. Formal and informal communications with investors enable management and the Board to understand and consider the issues that matter most to our shareholders, so that the Company can effectively address them.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     19


 

ESG, Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility

Our long-term strategy is focused on meeting our commitments to our policyholders and agents, with a view toward delivering outstanding financial results for our shareholders. We recognize that working to make a difference in the world and in the communities where we do business furthers that strategy. We place importance on operating as a socially responsible organization that is committed to treating our policyholders, employees, agents and vendors fairly, protecting our environment, giving back and enriching our communities, and governing our actions with integrity. We fundamentally believe that these values and good corporate citizenship are essential to our success and that by monitoring ESG issues, we can capitalize on ESG opportunities and respond to material ESG risks. The Company sponsors, and our employees are engaged in, many volunteer activities. The Hanover Insurance Group Foundation is an active contributor to non-profit organizations in the communities where we work, with special emphasis on public education systems and youth. Our key corporate values are described as “CARE,” Collaboration, Accountability, Respect and Empowerment.

During 2020, the Company and the communities in which we work faced unprecedented challenges, including the impacts of the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic and civil and social unrest related to racial injustice in the United States. These events brought to the forefront the importance of human capital management and inclusion and diversity on our business strategy. Our strategy of building a premier property and casualty insurer relies upon our ability to effectively lead our employees and to create an inclusive and diverse workforce. We recognize that a diverse workforce is an important factor in building an inclusive environment that fosters innovation, respect and collaboration and that without inclusion, respect and collaboration, we may not be able to innovate, respond to emerging issues, or effectively compete within our industry.

Human Capital Management

To support the safety and continued development of our workforce in 2020, we initiated or continued to emphasize the following actions:

 

shifted the vast majority of our employees to remote work arrangements to ensure their health and safety;

 

enacted temporary policies and modified existing policies to provide support to employees facing difficult circumstances related to their personal health and their families’ health or care;

 

enabled part-time employees to maintain medical plan selections, and provided other health and wellness offerings designed to promote the physical, financial, mental and social well-being of our employees, their families and dependents;

 

to foster accountability, every employee, regardless of role, received a formal annual evaluation and performance discussion, and the evaluation process is aligned to our CARE values; and

 

supported career development through our robust online learning opportunities, virtual and classroom workshops and experiential learning, as well as providing reimbursement for tuition and education-related fees (including professional and industry designations).

Inclusion and Diversity  

Our I&D journey continued in 2020 as we took the following actions:

 

continued to include I&D goals and objectives into the overall performance assessment for both our CEO and executive leadership team, linking I&D initiatives into incentive compensation metrics in furtherance of the Company’s strategic objectives (see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section beginning on page 26 for additional information);

 

the Board discussed and focused upon I&D and racial inequality issues throughout the year, and made a long-term commitment to maintaining that dialogue and focus in the future;

 

released an internal and external statement from our CEO reaffirming the Company's deep commitment to Black lives and equality;

 

accelerated our I&D efforts to continue diversifying our recruitment and hiring practices;

 

continued to support a wide variety of internal business resource groups, which are employee-led groups that support women and underrepresented populations and allies of those populations;

 

acknowledged Juneteenth for all employees and provided resources and education on the importance of the day and the history behind it;

 

held a Company-wide “PAUSE” Week program, which encouraged all employees to slow down and consider how bias may impact important business and people decisions;

 

partnered with an external I&D consultant to foster a conversation on unconscious bias with our Board, building on efforts done previously across our leadership and employee populations; and

 

introduced the Hanover CAREs matching charitable gift program to encourage eligible employees to support efforts to eradicate racial injustice, with the Company matching employee gifts to select registered 501(c)(3) institutions.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     20


 

ESG Disclosures  

In 2020, we also provided additional transparency to stakeholders about our ESG efforts and priorities by publicly posting the following on our Company website:

 

detailed ESG disclosures under the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reporting framework in the form of a GRI-referenced content index (available at www.hanover.com – under “Why The Hanover – Global reporting initiative index”);

 

our inaugural 2018-2020 Inclusion and Diversity Report that highlights key milestones in the Company’s I&D journey and provides snapshots of the Company’s current workforce demographics (available at www.hanover.com – under “Why The Hanover – Inclusion and diversity”);

 

a responsible investment policy that details how the Company incorporates ESG factors into its decision-making as part of the fundamental investment research and decision-making process, including the Company’s commitment to phase out and no longer invest in companies that: (i) will generate more than 25% of their revenue from mining or processing thermal coal, (ii) are in the process of developing, or have plans to develop, any new coal mine, new coal plant or new coal infrastructure, and (iii) will have more than 25% of their oil reserves in tar sands and/or will generate more than 25% of their revenue from the shipment of tar sands oil (available at www.hanover.com – under “Why The Hanover – ESG Overview –Responsible investment policy”); and

 

an investor ESG presentation provided to serve as support and reference in ESG discussions with investors and provide a resource to all shareholders (available at www.hanover.com – under “Investors – Events & Presentations –ESG Presentation”).

We invite you to learn more about our commitment to be an involved corporate citizen and a responsible steward of the resources entrusted to us by visiting the Company’s Corporate Responsibility website, www.hanover.com – under “Why The Hanover – ESG Overview.” Information on our website is not part of or incorporated into this Proxy Statement.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     21


 

ITEM I

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board currently has thirteen members and consists of three classes whose terms end in successive years. There are five nominees for election to the Board this year. Ms. Taggart is being nominated to serve for a two-year term expiring in 2023 to coincide with her mandatory retirement under our director retirement policy. Mses. Egan and Lane, and Messrs. Bradicich and Condrin are each being nominated to serve for a three-year term expiring in 2024. Ms. Lane, whose current term otherwise expires in 2023, is being nominated for a three-year term in order to maintain appropriate balance in the size of each of our director classes.

Mr. Condron has reached mandatory retirement age under the Company's director retirement policy and, in accordance with the policy, will retire from the Board at the Annual Meeting. The Board has voted to reduce the size of the Board to twelve, effective immediately following the Annual Meeting and the retirement of Mr. Condron.

Directors serve until the expiration of their stated term and until their successor has been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation, removal or disqualification.

All of the nominees have indicated their willingness to serve and, unless otherwise directed, it is intended that proxies received in response to this solicitation will be voted in favor of the election of each of the nominees.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast (in person or by proxy) is required to elect director nominees. For purposes of electing directors, a majority of the votes cast means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. Broker non-votes and abstentions, because they are not votes cast, are not counted for this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome.

If a nominee who is currently serving as a director is not re-elected at the Annual Meeting, then, under Delaware law, the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, under our by-laws, any director who is nominated but fails to be re-elected is required to promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board, effective at the end of his or her current term. The NCGC will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. In making their determinations, the NCGC and the Board may consider any factors deemed relevant. The Board will act on the NCGC’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. The director who tenders his or her resignation will not vote on the NCGC’s recommendation or the Board’s decision. Since Ms. Lane is a nominee whose current term does not otherwise expire at the upcoming Annual Meeting, were she not to be re-elected at the Annual Meeting, her tendered resignation would not be effective until the end of her current term in 2023.

In the event that any of the nominees should be unavailable to serve as a director, it is intended that the proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute nominees, if any, as shall be designated by the Board. The Board and Management have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unavailable to serve.

Information as to each nominee and as to directors continuing in office can be found under the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Corporate Governance.”

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees.

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees.

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     22


 

ITEM II

ADVISORY APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Each year since our annual meeting in 2011, we have provided our shareholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote regarding the compensation of our named executive officers. At each meeting, our shareholders overwhelmingly approved the proposal, with more than 95% of the votes cast voting in favor of each proposal. As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are again seeking advisory shareholder approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Executive Compensation.” Shareholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory vote:

 

Voted:

To approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and any related disclosure).

A substantial percentage of our named executive officers’ compensation is directly tied to stock performance and the attainment of financial and other performance measures the Board believes promote long-term shareholder value and position us for long-term success. As described more fully in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the mix of fixed and performance-based compensation, the terms of our short- and long-term incentive compensation programs, and the weighting of variable compensation more heavily toward equity awards, are all designed to enable us to attract and retain top talent and align the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders, while balancing risk and reward. The Compensation and Human Capital Committee and the Board believe the design of the programs, and the compensation awarded to the named executive officers under the current programs, fulfills these objectives.

Shareholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 26, which discusses in detail how our compensation programs support our compensation philosophy.

Although the vote is non-binding, the Board and the Compensation and Human Capital Committee will consider the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of the Company’s compensation programs. We currently intend to hold advisory votes on executive compensation annually. Accordingly, we anticipate the next such vote will be held at the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast (in person or by proxy) is required for approval of this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, because they are not votes cast, are not counted for this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome.

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of this proposal.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of this proposal.

 

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     23


 

ITEM III

RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent, external audit firm retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. The firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) has been appointed by the Audit Committee of the Board to serve as the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm for 2021. PwC has been retained as the Company’s independent, external auditor since 1995 and, for a predecessor company, beginning in 1991. Representatives of PwC will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee periodically considers whether the Company should change its independent, external audit firm. Additionally, in conjunction with the mandated rotation of PwC’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair are directly involved in the selection of PwC’s new lead engagement partner.

The members of the Audit Committee and the Board believe the continued retention of PwC to serve as the Company’s independent external auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its investors. For a discussion of the factors that the Audit Committee considered in retaining PwC for 2021, see the “Audit Committee” section beginning on page 14. The Board is submitting the appointment of PwC as the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm for 2021 to the shareholders for their ratification. The Audit Committee bears the ultimate responsibility for selecting the firm and will make the selection it deems best for the Company and its shareholders. Should the shareholders fail to ratify the appointment of PwC, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment and may retain PwC or another accounting firm without resubmitting the matter to shareholders. Similarly, ratification of the selection of PwC as the independent, registered public accounting firm does not limit the Audit Committee’s ability to change this selection in the future.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast (in person or by proxy) is required for approval of this proposal. Abstentions, because they are not votes cast, are not counted for this proposal and will have no effect on the outcome.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of this proposal.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of this proposal.

Fees Incurred from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

The table below shows the fees paid or accrued for the audit and other services provided by PwC for 2020 and 2019.

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Audit Fees (1)

 

$

2,813,066

 

 

$

2,694,660

 

 Audit-Related Fees (2)

 

 

311,361

 

 

 

134,428

 

 Tax Fees (3)

 

 

 

 

 

150,044

 

 All Other Fees (4)

 

 

5,400

 

 

 

5,400

 

 

(1)

Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our financial statements, including the audit of the internal controls over financial reporting, the review of our quarterly financial statements, and audit services provided in connection with statutory or other regulatory filings.

(2)

Audit-related fees consisted primarily of attestation services, services provided in connection with reviews by state insurance departments, and other consulting services. Increase in audit-related fees in 2020 was primarily attributable to work on the Company’s $300 million senior unsecured debt offering.

(3)

Tax fees consisted of tax services and consulting related to legal entity restructuring undertaken by the Company in 2019.

(4)

Other services related to purchased software.

Fees and Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing and approving the audit fee negotiations associated with the Company’s retention of PwC. In addition, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve all services performed by the independent auditor. At the beginning of each annual audit cycle, the Audit Committee pre-approves certain categories of audit, audit-related and other services, but such projects within these categories with fees expected to be $250,000 or greater must be specifically approved.

The Chair of the Audit Committee (or, in her absence, any other member of the Audit Committee) has the authority to pre-approve other audit-related and non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors and associated fees, provided that such services are not otherwise prohibited and any decisions to pre-approve such services and fees are reported to the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting. During 2020, the Audit Committee reviewed and pre-approved all services performed by the independent auditor, including non-audit services, in accordance with the policy set forth above. The Audit Committee reviews and considers aggregate fees and other factors for all audit-related and non-audit services compared to the overall audit fee in assessing the independence of PwC.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     24


 

Audit Committee Report

Review of Audited Financial Statements with Management

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements of the Company.

Review of Financial Statements and Other Matters with Independent Auditors

An integral part of the audit process is to ensure that the Audit Committee receives information regarding the scope and results of the audit. Various communication requirements pertaining to the conduct of an audit exist to enhance the information flow and to assist the Audit Committee in discharging its oversight responsibility. In this regard, the Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent, registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standards No. 16, Communication with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee also received written disclosures and a letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP regarding its communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence from the Company, pursuant to applicable requirements of the PCAOB, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from the Company. The Audit Committee considered and determined that the provision of the non-audit professional services approved by the Audit Committee in 2020 is compatible with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s maintaining its independence from the Company.

Responsibility and Oversight

Management is responsible for the Company’s financial statements, the overall reporting process and the system of internal control over financial reporting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as our independent, registered public accounting firm, is responsible for conducting annual audits and quarterly reviews of the Company’s financial statements and expressing an opinion as to the conformity, in all material respects, of the annual financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the fiscal year. In performing their oversight responsibility, the members of the Audit Committee rely, without independent verification of the information provided to them, on the representations made by management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Recommendation that Financial Statements be Included in the Annual Report

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above and relying thereon, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 for filing with the SEC.

Other Matters

The Audit Committee satisfied its responsibilities under its Charter for the year 2020. For additional information on the duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee, see the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled “Related-Person Transactions” (page 12), “Board Committees – Audit Committee” (page 14), “Board’s Role in Risk Oversight” (page 19), and the Audit Committee charter, available on our website, www.hanover.com, under “Why The Hanover – Our Governance – Committee Charters – Audit Committee” or from our Corporate Secretary.

In accordance with the rules of the SEC, this report is not to be deemed “soliciting material,” or deemed to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the SEC’s Regulation 14A, other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically requests that the information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates it by reference in documents otherwise filed.

February 18, 2021

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Jane D. Carlin, Chair

Kevin J. Bradicich

Martin P. Hughes

Harriett “Tee” Taggart

 

The Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that THG specifically incorporates this information by reference, and it shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     25


 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures - The discussion of our results in this CD&A includes a discussion of our operating income before interest expense and income taxes (“pre-tax operating income”), pre-tax operating income excluding catastrophes (“ex-cat operating income”) and operating return on equity. Each of these financial measures is a non-GAAP financial measure. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measure and/or explanations of how we calculate these measures are contained in Appendix B to this Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”)

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee (the “C&HCC”), in consultation with the Board’s Committee of Independent Directors (the “CID”), is responsible for establishing and monitoring our executive compensation programs. More specifically, the C&HCC is responsible for approving the compensation for our executive officers, including those identified in the Summary Compensation Table on page 43 (our “named executive officers,” or “NEOs”), subject, in the case of our CEO, to approval by the CID. Although this discussion and analysis refers principally to compensation of our NEOs, the same general compensation principles and practices apply to all our executive officers.

Executive Summary and Overview

Fiscal 2020 Highlights

Our 2020 performance was strong, with significant contributions from virtually every component of our business. Highlights include:

 

Net Income – net income of $358.7 million;

 

 

Pre-Tax Operating Income – pre-tax operating income of $484.7 million, an increase of 6.9% from 2019;

 

 

Ex-Cat Operating Income – ex-cat operating income of $771.4 million, an increase of 23.8% from 2019;

 

 

Operating Return on Equity – 13.1% operating return on equity;

 

 

Proactive and Efficient Management of Capital – repurchased approximately 2.2 million shares of our Common Stock at a cost of approximately $212.8 million; issued $300 million of 2.5% senior unsecured debentures to allow us to redeem our 6.35% subordinated unsecured debentures, providing additional available capital while reducing overall interest expense;

 

 

Book Value Per Share – book value per share increased 15.8% from 2019;

 

 

Execution of Other Strategic Objectives – executed on several major strategic priorities, as discussed under “Short-Term Incentive Compensation” below;

 

 

Dividend Yield – increased our quarterly dividend by 7.7% to $0.70 per share, or $2.80 annualized, returning $99.5 million to our shareholders in the form of dividends;

 

 

TSR – total shareholder return of 23.89% (assuming reinvestment of dividends) for the three-year period ending on December 31, 2020;

 

 

No Material Changes to Executive Compensation Plans or Awards due to the Pandemic – other than adding certain COVID-19 related strategic business objectives to our short-term incentive compensation plan, we made no mid-year changes to any executive compensation programs or awards in response to the Pandemic or otherwise;

 

 

Company Recognition – for the fourth consecutive year earned both a perfect score on The Corporate Equality Index and was recognized as a best place to work for LGBTQ equality by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation; recognized by Women’s Forum of New York for actively advancing women on corporate boards; and named a best company for Women and a best company where CEOs support gender diversity by Fairygodboss; and

 

 

Company Pandemic Response – undertook initiatives to support our employees and local communities; actively engaged investors and shareholders virtually; launched a Customer Financial Relief Program; and provided greater technical and operational support to our partner agents.

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     26


 

2020 Pay Decisions

During 2020, we maintained our commitment to “pay for performance,” and continued to emphasize variable compensation over fixed pay. To that end, during 2020:

Variable Compensation Opportunity - As described in "2020 NEO Pay Mix" below: NEO Variable Compensation = over 74% of total target compensation package Approx. 64% of variable compensation is long-term equity tied to stock performance Approx. 36% of variable compensation is cash tied to performance Short-Term Incentive Plan – As described in “Short-Term Incentive Compensation” below, strong underlying performance and achievement of strategic objectives resulted in a funding level at 140% of target PBRSU Payout – Three-year total shareholder return of 23.89% (assuming reinvestment of dividends) resulted in performance at the 88th percentile as compared to a pre-identified set of peers, and accordingly, our performance-based restricted stock units (“PBRSUs”) for the 2018-2020 period were earned at 150% of target (0%) Threshold (25%) Target (100%) Maximum (150%) Payout (150%)

Our compensation decisions reflect, in part, the strong support our shareholders have expressed by approving our “say on pay” proposals. In each year since we began holding an annual “say on pay” vote, more than 95% of the shares cast on these proposals have been voted in favor of our executive pay programs and practices.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     27


 

2020 NEO Pay Mix

The following charts represent the 2020 pay mix for John C. Roche, our President and CEO, and our other NEOs as a group, expressed as a percentage of total target compensation opportunity for the year.

CEO Target Compensation Average All Other NEO Target Compensation Annual Base Salary Short-Term Incentive Compensation Long-Term Incentive Compensation 19% 54% 27% 43% 30% 27% Variable Compensation 81% Variable Compensation 70%

Relationship Between Pay and Performance

One of the primary objectives in the design and implementation of our executive compensation programs is to ensure that a meaningful relationship exists between the compensation earned by our executives and the overall success of our organization. This objective, however, is also weighed against other important considerations, such as the importance of rewarding individual achievement, recognizing the longer-term value of achieving strategic and operating objectives, attracting and retaining key executives, maintaining stability in our organization, demonstrating leadership capabilities and promoting what we call our “CARE” values (Collaboration, Accountability, Respect, Empowerment), which includes supporting our inclusion and diversity objectives. To that end, when making compensation decisions, the C&HCC also considers events or circumstances that we have limited ability to manage, such as unusual weather-related losses and catastrophes, and other significant contributions and/or achievements of our executives. To achieve these objectives, we design our executive compensation programs to include what we believe is an appropriate mix of fixed versus variable compensation elements.

Over the past three years, variable compensation opportunities (long-and short-term incentive target awards) have comprised nearly three-quarters of our NEOs’ total target annual compensation opportunity, nearly two-thirds of which has been in the form of long-term equity awards tied to stock price performance. We believe tying such a large portion of our NEOs’ total target compensation opportunity to variable compensation, while providing competitive levels of base salary, strikes an appropriate balance between fixed compensation and compensation that may fluctuate based on company and individual performance, and has resulted in a meaningful relationship between both our short- and long-term performance and pay actually earned and realized by our NEOs.

To demonstrate the relationship between pay and performance, compensation consultants and proxy advisory firms have promoted the use of various “realized,” “realizable” or “earned” pay formula analyses. We believe such analyses are useful and may serve as valuable tools to measure the effectiveness of our compensation program design, but we recognize that no standard definition of “realized,” “realizable” or “earned” pay has emerged, and each variation utilized by consultants and proxy advisory firms has significant limitations. Accordingly, rather than devise and illustrate alternative formulaic measures, we believe an examination of variable compensation earnings over the past three years sufficiently demonstrates the connection between our overall performance and the amounts earned by our NEOs.

By most measures, we have demonstrated very strong performance over the past three years. During this period, our stock price appreciated 8.2%, our ordinary annual dividends paid per share increased 19.4% ($2.22 per share in 2018 to $2.65 per share in 2020), and we returned approximately $1.4 billion to shareholders in the form of stock buy-backs and dividend payments. Moreover, we continued to diversify our business across product lines and geographies and grew net written premium for our domestic operations by over 11.9%. In addition to our financial achievements, during the period we executed on many key strategic priorities, including:  the sale of our Lloyd’s of London business, the Chaucer group, and related capital deployment actions; increased investments in technology with an emphasis on modernizing our platforms and advancing innovation and digitization initiatives; continued progress on inclusion and diversity, cultural and human capital development; and we successfully responded

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     28


 

and continue to adapt to the challenges presented by COVID-19 and the subsequent global pandemic (the “Pandemic”). We believe our executive compensation programs over this period appropriately rewarded our executives for the value generated for our shareholders.

Short-Term Incentive Compensation Awards

Year

 

Performance Measure Targets

 

Actual Results/

Percent of Target

 

Payout Relative

to Target Award

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

Pre-Tax Operating Income - $425M - $459M

Ex-Cat Operating Income - $619M - $653M

Pre-Established Strategic Priorities

 

$406.5M - 95%

$625.7M - 100%

Achieved

 

100%

2019

 

Pre-Tax Operating Income - $449M

Ex-Cat Operating Income - $652M

Pre-Established Strategic Priorities

 

$453.6M - 103%

$622.9M - 93%

Achieved

 

110%

2020*

 

Pre-Tax Operating Income - $416M

Ex-Cat Operating Income - $630M

Pre-Established Strategic Priorities

 

$484.7M - 150%

$771.4M - 200%

Achieved

 

140%

 

*

For a discussion of how performance measure targets were determined for 2020, please see “The funding level achieved under the STIP.” on page 33.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation: PBRSUs with Performance Periods Ending in 2018, 2019 and 2020*

Year Ended

 

Target (100%)

 

3-Year Total

Shareholder

Return

 

Relative Total

Shareholder

Return

 

Payout

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

Three-Year Relative Total

Shareholder Return at the 50th Percentile

 

43.55%

 

58th Percentile

 

115%

2019

 

 

69.75%

 

88th Percentile

 

150%

2020

 

 

23.89%

 

88th Percentile

 

150%

 

*

Table does not reflect off-cycle awards made in connection with Mr. Farber’s hiring in 2016 or Mr. Salvatore’s hiring in 2017.

Long-Term Compensation: Options Granted in 2018, 2019 and 2020

 

 

 

 

FY End 2018

 

FY End 2019

 

FY End 2020

Year of

Option

Award

 

Option

Exercise

Price*

 

THG

Closing

Price

 

Intrinsic

Value

per

Option

 

THG

Closing

Price

 

Intrinsic

Value

per

Option

 

THG

Closing

Price

 

Intrinsic

Value

per

Option

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$104.11

 

$116.77

 

$12.66

 

$136.67

 

$32.56

 

$116.92

 

$12.81

2019

 

$117.22

 

N/A

 

$136.67

 

$19.45

 

$116.92

 

2020

 

$118.54

 

N/A

 

$116.92

 

 

*

Adjusted, as applicable, to reflect the payment of special dividends during 2019.

Intrinsic Value is calculated as the difference between the applicable THG Closing Price and the Option Exercise Price.

Other Significant Compensation Practices

 

Equity Awards – our long-term awards for executive officers have historically been granted exclusively in the form of equity-based awards, ensuring the value of such awards at exercise or settlement is tied to our stock price and aligned with shareholder interests;

 

Vesting – our long-term equity incentives, including performance-based incentives, generally vest over a period of three years to ensure that our executives maintain a longer-term view of shareholder value creation and to encourage retention;

 

Maximum Payout Caps – our variable short- and long-term incentive plans are capped at a maximum payout level, and the C&HCC retains discretion to reduce or eliminate payments to executive officers under the annual short-term incentive compensation program;

 

Clawback Policy – we maintain a clawback policy that requires NEOs, in certain circumstances, to return cash and equity incentive compensation payments if our financial statements are restated as a result of their wrongdoing. Additionally,

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     29


 

 

the terms of our equity award agreements subject the executive to the potential return of the value received upon vesting or exercise of such awards in the event the executive breaches certain non-solicitation, non-interference or confidentiality provisions or otherwise violates our Code of Conduct;

 

Limited Perquisites – we provide limited perquisites to our executives;

 

Prohibition on Pledging/Hedging – pursuant to our insider trading policy, executives and directors are prohibited from pledging any of their THG securities, and all officers, directors and employees are prohibited from hedging their exposure to ownership of, or interests in, our securities;

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines – we require all of our executive officers (and certain other senior officers) to maintain substantial levels of ownership of our stock to ensure that their interests are effectively aligned with those of our shareholders (see “Stock Ownership Guidelines for Named Executive Officers and Directors” on page 4);

 

Contractual Protections for the Company – every executive is subject to non-solicitation, non-interference and confidentiality agreements that extend one year or more beyond termination of employment;

 

No Re-pricing of Stock Option Grants – we have never re-priced stock option grants;

 

No Tax Gross-Ups – none of our executive officers are entitled to receive a “280G tax gross-up” payment under our Employment Continuity Plan (the change in control or “CIC Plan”); and

 

“Double Trigger” for Change in Control Benefits – our CIC Plan and, with a limited exception for “retirement-eligible employees,” our long-term incentive award agreements, each contain “double trigger” provisions that require an involuntary or constructive termination of employment in connection with a change in control as a condition to receiving any change in control benefits.

In summary, our performance and, with respect to long-term incentive awards, our stock price, have a significant impact on our NEO compensation. The C&HCC continues to grant target compensation at levels that it believes are appropriate under current circumstances, but actual compensation is, and is expected to continue to be, highly dependent on our financial performance and stock price appreciation.

Executive Compensation Policy and Objectives

The overall objectives of our executive compensation programs are to:

 

attract and retain qualified, high-performing individuals who will contribute to our continued success;

 

tie a significant portion of compensation to overall financial and business objectives, balancing risk and reward;

 

incentivize executives to manage and invest in the long-term, sustained success of the Company;

 

encourage our executives to promote our “CARE” values, including our commitments to inclusion and diversity and human capital development; and

 

align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders.

Each component of compensation is intended to achieve particular objectives, and the entire compensation package is designed to align with our business strategy and be reasonably competitive in the marketplace. Although we do not have a policy for a fixed allocation between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation, we design our NEO compensation packages with greater emphasis on variable compensation tied to performance rather than base salary, and a significant portion of total target compensation is in the form of long-term, equity-based awards, which are subject to substantial vesting requirements and the value of which are dependent on our stock performance. This approach is intended to balance short- and long-term performance goals and promote shareholder value.

Setting Executive Compensation

Use of Compensation Consultants and Comparative Data

In evaluating our executive compensation programs, the C&HCC is advised by its independent compensation consultant, F.W. Cook, as discussed in the “Board Committees-Compensation and Human Capital Committee” section beginning on page 15. F.W. Cook provides information as to compensation levels for comparable positions at other companies that compete with us for executive talent. For 2020, this data was prepared based upon the publicly disclosed proxy statements of the group of property and casualty insurance companies listed below (the “Comparative Proxy Data” and such companies, the “Comparative Proxy Data Companies”) and market pay data collected from the Mercer U.S. Property & Casualty Insurance Company Survey (size-adjusted data collected from 54 property and casualty insurance companies) (the “Comparative Market Data”). The Comparative Proxy Data Companies were determined by the C&HCC based upon the recommendation of F.W. Cook due to their relative size, comparable business mix and overlap with peer groups established by certain proxy advisory firms. Based on the C&HCC’s evaluation and F.W. Cook’s recommendations, no changes were made to the list of Comparative Proxy Data Companies for 2020.

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     30


 

Comparative Proxy Data Companies

 

•    Alleghany Corporation

•    Mercury General Corporation

•    American Financial Group, Inc.

•    Old Republic International Corporation

•    Axis Capital Holdings Limited

•    Selective Insurance Group, Inc.

•    Cincinnati Financial Corporation

•    State Auto Financial Corporation

•    CNA Financial Corporation

•    The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

•    Kemper Corporation

•    W.R. Berkley Corporation

•    Markel Corporation

 

The C&HCC reviews the Comparative Proxy Data and the Comparative Market Data, including information on base salary levels, target and actual total cash levels, long-term incentive opportunities and target and actual total compensation levels, as well as comparative financial metrics, such as direct premiums written, market capitalization, and net income. While the C&HCC believes the Comparative Proxy Data and the Comparative Market Data are useful, such data is intended solely as one of several reference points to assist the C&HCC in its compensation discussions and deliberations. Accordingly, rather than relying on or setting benchmarks for our executive compensation solely against such data, the C&HCC instead relies on the general knowledge, experience and judgment of its members, both with regard to competitive compensation levels and the relative success that we have achieved in recruiting and retaining personnel.

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions and CEO Performance Review

C&HCC meetings are regularly attended by our CEO, General Counsel and Chief Human Resources Officer, as well as a representative of F.W. Cook. Each individual generally participates in these meetings and provides counsel and advice at the C&HCC’s request. Other independent directors and members of management also attend meetings from time to time. In addition, the C&HCC regularly meets in executive session without members of management present. An executive is not permitted to be present while the C&HCC conducts its deliberations on that executive’s compensation.

Following a process that was established by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “NCGC”) and the Board, our independent Chair of the Board leads an annual performance review of the CEO. This review includes discussions with directors and officers, and a review of the CEO’s self-assessment and of our financial and operational performance. The C&HCC annually considers the CEO’s performance and other relevant external factors and makes a recommendation to the CID for the CEO’s annual compensation. The C&HCC’s recommendation and the results of the performance evaluation are then reviewed and discussed by the CID. Results of this review process help form the basis for establishing the CEO’s annual compensation package. The CID has final authority to approve the compensation of our CEO.

For compensation decisions regarding NEOs (other than the CEO), the C&HCC primarily considers the recommendations of our CEO, its own observations regarding each executive, as well as information provided by F.W. Cook.

Principal Components of Executive Compensation

Base Salary paid bi-weekly throughout 2020 Short-Term Incentive – based on 2020 Company and individual performance. Lump sum paid in March 2021. Long-Term Incentive – Time-Based and Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units. Cliff vest in 2023 Long-Term Incentive – Non-Qualified Stock Options. 1/3 of the award vests on the first three anniversaries of grant 2020 2021 2022 2023 Options have a 10-year term (2030)

 

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     31


 

I. Annual Base Salary

Annual base salary is designed to provide a fixed level of compensation to our NEOs depending on their roles, skills, qualifications and competitive pay levels (based upon the Comparative Proxy Data and Comparative Market Data), as well as to attract and retain employees. Base salary, however, is only one of several different components of an executive’s total compensation package and makes up a significantly smaller portion of total target compensation than the combined short- and long-term incentive opportunities described below.

2020 Base Salary Rate

NEO

 

2020 Base Salary Rate ($)

 

% Change*

 

 

 

 

 

John C. Roche

 

1,000,000

 

5.3

President and CEO

 

 

 

 

Jeffrey M. Farber

 

700,000

 

2.2

EVP and CFO

 

 

 

 

Richard W. Lavey

 

550,000

 

4.8

EVP and President, Hanover Agency Markets

 

 

 

 

Bryan J. Salvatore

 

540,000

 

3.8

EVP and President, Specialty

 

 

 

 

Dennis F. Kerrigan

 

510,000

 

EVP and General Counsel

 

 

 

 

 

*Percentage change measured against base salary rate in effect as of the end of 2019.  Adjustments effective March 2020.

With respect to Messrs. Roche, Farber, Lavey and Salvatore, their annual base salary adjustments were each deemed warranted by the C&HCC in light of the NEO’s expertise, experience and breadth of responsibilities, and after a review of Comparative Proxy Data and Comparative Market Data. Mr. Kerrigan’s base salary for 2020 was agreed upon as a condition to Mr. Kerrigan joining the Company in early January.

II.Short-Term Incentive Compensation

Our short-term incentive compensation program is an annual performance-based bonus program that provides cash compensation opportunities for our NEOs. Opportunities are targeted at a percentage of annual base salary, depending on each participant’s role, competitive pay levels (based upon the Comparative Proxy Data and Comparative Market Data) and overall pay package. Actual payouts under the program’s terms could range from 0% to approximately 195% of the target award based upon Company and individual performance, as discussed below.

Specifically, this program is designed to motivate and reward:

 

achievement of annual targeted financial goals;

 

overall contribution to the Company;

 

achievement of annual operating business goals and strategic priorities that are linked to overall corporate financial results and other business priorities; and

 

demonstration of core leadership competencies and “CARE” values.

2020 Short-Term Incentive Compensation Target Awards

NEO

 

Target Award as a % of Base Salary Rate

 

 

 

 

 

John C. Roche

 

150%

 

Jeffrey M. Farber

 

110%

 

Richard W. Lavey

 

90%

 

Bryan J. Salvatore

 

90%

 

Dennis F. Kerrigan

 

75%

 

In 2020, the target award was increased for (i) Mr. Roche from 130% to 150% of base salary, (ii) Mr. Farber from 100% to 110% of base salary, and (ii) Messrs. Lavey and Salvatore from 80% to 90% of base salary. These increases were made in recognition of each NEO’s increased expertise, experience and the breadth of their respective responsibilities, and after a review of Comparative Proxy Data and Comparative Market Data. Mr. Kerrigan’s target award for 2020 was agreed upon as a condition to Mr. Kerrigan joining the Company in early January.

The C&HCC retains discretion to determine the individual bonus amount to be paid to each NEO. In determining the individual awards for our NEOs, for 2020, the C&HCC primarily considered (1) the funding level achieved under our 2020 Short-Term Incentive Compensation Program (the “STIP”) and (2) each NEO’s individual performance, each consideration is further described below.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     32


 

The funding level achieved under the STIP. The STIP is a performance-based bonus program that provides incentive cash compensation opportunities to approximately one-half of our workforce, including our NEOs and each of our executive officers. For 2020, potential funding under the STIP ranged from 0% to a maximum of approximately 195% of target based on the following three pre-established performance metrics: (i) as-reported pre-tax operating income (20% weighting); (ii) ex-cat operating income (35% weighting); and (iii) the strategic objectives discussed below (45% weighting). The C&HCC chose this combination of performance metrics because they are the primary measures by which the Board evaluates our financial and operating performance. Achievement of these performance metrics is expected to enhance our stock value and shareholder returns in both the short- and long-term. While the mix of metrics and basic overall design of the program remained unchanged for 2020, the C&HCC made the following pre-established adjustments to the program:

 

modified the weighting of the three metrics to enhance focus on the achievement of our strategic business objectives; and

 

modestly reduced the level of pre-tax operating and ex-cat operating income required to achieve “target” funding levels.

These pre-established modifications to the STIP for 2020 were implemented to:

 

better align overall plan funding to the Company’s relative performance within the industry; and

 

place additional emphasis on performance factors within management’s near-term control, including achievement of key near-term strategic priorities that we believe will enhance our long-term success and sustainability.

Actual funding is not intended to be formulaically obtained by strict application of these items, and the C&HCC retains the discretion to increase or decrease the funding pool and individual awards based upon factors it deems appropriate and in the best interests of the Company. Set forth below are the pre-tax operating income and ex-cat operating income levels required to obtain threshold, target and maximum funding levels for the plan:

Funding Level

 

Pre-Tax Operating

Income

(in millions)

 

Ex-Cat Operating

Income

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Threshold (25% and 50% funding, respectively)

 

$166

 

$441

Target (100% funding)

 

$416

 

$630

Maximum (175% and 200% funding, respectively)

 

$520

 

$756

The minimum level of pre-tax operating income and ex-cat operating income required to achieve target funding levels was decreased by $33 million (7.3%) and $22 million (3.4%), respectively, below 2019 targets. Targets established for 2020 were set at levels reflecting the Company’s anticipated earnings power and planned strategic investments, as well as our desire to set goals that represent a legitimate and meaningful challenge to the organization and to better reward employees when our financial performance compares favorably to that of our peers in the industry.

During 2020, pre-tax operating income was $484.7 million and ex-cat operating income was $771.4 million. Accordingly, under the formula set forth in the STIP, these two funding components of the program were achieved at 150% and 200% of target, respectively.

In addition to the financial metrics discussed above, for 2020, the following strategic objectives were considered:

Strategic Objective

Measure of Achievement

 

 

Quality of Earnings

•       earnings achieved at above plan, despite higher than forecast catastrophe losses and lower net investment income

•       proactively managed capital, refinancing debt at a significantly lower cost and executing effective share repurchases

Profitable Growth

•       despite economic pressures associated with the Pandemic, including the issuance of Pandemic-related premium returns, achieved modest increase in net premium written

•       continued rigor associated with improving a balanced and well-diversified underwriting portfolio

•       continued progress appointing new, high-quality agents, particularly in underpenetrated geographies

Relative Performance

•      achieved top quartile (13.1%) operating return on equity

•      catastrophe experience more benign than industry experience

Organization Effectiveness

•       implemented new commissions system

•       upgraded general ledger system

•       continued buildout of Commercial Lines underwriting system

•       upgraded billing platform

•       launched a series of predictive tools to support large claim identification and fraud identification

•       enhanced predictive analytics solutions

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     33


 

Strategic Objective

Measure of Achievement

 

 

Organization of the Future

•       hired innovation leader for Personal Lines and Claims while continuing to engage our enterprise in our “Every Day” innovation theme

•       launched new online learning platform

•       launched several initiatives aimed at accelerating leadership succession candidates

•       made notable progress on our inclusion and diversity initiatives, including:

-       releasing our inaugural inclusion and diversity report;

-       diversifying our recruitment and hiring practices by training talent acquisition to become Certified Diversity Recruiters;

-       introducing the Hanover CAREs matching gift program to encourage employee support of charitable organizations that seek to eradicate racial injustice; and

-       partnering with a third-party consultant to deliver a series of facilitated conversations for employees focused on race and equity challenges in society

Priorities in Response to COVID-19*

•       amplified CARE culture to support employees and local communities; Company initiatives included:

-       seamless and successful transition of over 85% of our employees to a remote work environment;

-       enhanced leadership communication and engagement channels;

-       enhanced time-off policies to ensure continued workforce flexibility;

-       conducted all-employee survey to measure employee connectedness and belonging in a remote workplace; and

-       donated more than $500,000 to local community non-profits to provide Pandemic-related assistance and made a $5 million donation to our charitable foundation

•       actively engaged investors and shareholders through virtual roadshows and a virtual annual meeting of shareholders

•       launched our Customer Financial Relief Program, which included;

-       premium returns for all eligible personal auto customers;

-       flexible bill payment options for customers in need; and

-       expanded personal auto and homeowners’ terms to cover delivery of essential goods, living and rental expenses resulting from repair delays

•       provided greater technical and operational supports to our partner agents

 

*

This strategic business objective was added mid-year in response to the challenges presented by the Pandemic.  No other mid-year changes were made to the short-term incentive program, or any other executive compensation program or award as a result of the Pandemic or otherwise.

After reviewing the Company’s overall financial performance during 2020 (measured in part by our pre-tax and ex-cat operating income results), the significant progress achieved with respect to the strategic objectives described above, and other factors, such as the level of difficulty associated with achieving these pre-set goals and our strong performance relative to the industry, the C&HCC determined to fund the STIP at 140% of target. While a strict formulaic approach would have produced significant additional funding for the program, the C&HCC took into consideration the unique circumstances of the Pandemic (balancing both its negative and positive financial impacts) and the program’s overall affordability and reasonableness in the current environment.  This funding level was the primary reference point for determining individual NEO awards because the C&HCC intends that the percentage of target paid to NEOs be comparable, generally, to the percentage funded to all participants under the STIP.

NEO individual performance. Another important factor in determining the level of payment to our NEOs is the C&HCC’s evaluation of each NEO’s overall performance within his area of responsibility. Set forth below are various contributions and accomplishments considered by the C&HCC in its evaluation of the overall individual performance of our NEOs.

John C. Roche

 

Financial metrics, including net income of $358.7; pre-tax operating income of $484.7; and operating return on equity of 13.1%;

 

Successfully managed challenges and opportunities associated with a nearly fully remote workforce during the Pandemic;

 

Amplified the CARE culture and modernized practices to support the needs of and commitments to all key stakeholders, including investors, partner agents, customers, employees and communities;

 

Made meaningful progress in I&D and cultural initiatives, including advancing enterprise support and continued external recognition of company culture and practices; and

 

Modernized platforms and made continued investments in innovation and digitization.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     34


 

 

Jeffrey M. Farber

 

Led effective corporate finance, investment, actuarial, risk management, corporate development and financial reporting group;

 

Led capital management actions including share repurchases and debt refinancing transactions;

 

Strategically managed the portfolio to mitigate risk and thoughtfully allocate capital to various business initiatives;

 

Drove productivity through the enhancement of expense and business investment discipline; and

 

Enhanced leading insights through data and analytics to improve financial outcomes and strengthened relationships and messaging with key external stakeholders.

Richard W. Lavey

 

Led Personal Lines and Core Commercial businesses, resulting in improved combined ratio and strong earnings for the portfolio;

 

Led initiative to develop structure, framework and content around key areas of transformation;

 

Led initiative to successfully respond to Michigan personal injury protection (PIP) reform; and

 

Adopted alternative approaches to maintain and enhance strong partner agent relationships, communications and support.

Bryan J. Salvatore

 

Led Specialty Lines, resulting in improved combined ratio and strong targeted growth for the portfolio;

 

Led initiatives to profitably expand new business development in the areas of financial institutions, cyber and retail excess and surplus; and

 

Improved distribution management and field coordination efforts.

Dennis F. Kerrigan

 

Successfully transitioned to role of General Counsel, managing the Company’s legal and compliance organizations within internal expense metrics;

 

Enhanced and strengthened the talent and diversity of the Company’s Office of the General Counsel through strategic hiring, promotions and organizational redesign;

 

Provided advice and counsel on the Company’s Pandemic-related response efforts, including legal, regulatory, sourcing (e.g., contractual relationships), human resources, litigation and disclosure matters; and

 

Advised the Board and management with respect to corporate governance matters.

The 2020 STIP awards were as follows:

NEO

 

Award ($)

 

 

 

 

 

John C. Roche

 

2,100,000

 

Jeffrey M. Farber

 

1,078,000

 

Richard W. Lavey

 

693,000

 

Bryan J. Salvatore

 

680,400

 

Dennis F. Kerrigan

 

535,500

 

III.Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Our long-term incentives are designed to:

 

encourage management to achieve long- and short-term goals, invest in our future and sustained success, and avoid short-term excessive risk taking;

 

align management’s financial incentives with our stock price and the longer-term financial interests of shareholders; and

 

recruit and retain key leaders.

Factors considered in determining our NEOs’ award opportunities under the long-term program include:

 

the importance of the NEO’s responsibilities within the organization;

 

the expected contributions of each NEO to our long-term performance;

 

the expense attributable to the award;

 

recruitment and retention considerations;

 

awards made to other executive officers;

 

competitive pay data;

 

the value of prior compensatory awards;

 

historical compensation; and

 

the projected value of prior grants and existing vesting schedules.

As a condition to each long-term incentive compensation award, each participant must agree to non-solicitation, non-interference and confidentiality provisions in our favor.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     35


 

2020 Long-Term Awards

The 2020 long-term awards for our NEOs were comprised of a combination of (i) performance-based (return on equity) restricted stock units (“ROE PBRSUs”); (ii) performance-based (relative total shareholder return) restricted stock units (“RTSR PBRSUs”); (iii) time-based restricted stock units (“TBRSUs”); and (iv) stock options.  Each component represented approximately 25% of the total value of the award based upon its grant date fair value. The mix of awards for our NEOs was intended to provide a balanced portfolio of equity awards and was chosen to tie the value able to be realized with respect to an award to long-term stock appreciation, while encouraging retention and, in some cases, the achievement of absolute or relative performance goals. Long-term awards serve to align management’s financial incentives with longer-term, sustained growth in our stock price, and are subject to multi-year vesting periods to encourage both retention and a longer-term stake in the well-being and prosperity of all of our stakeholders.

In 2020, the grant date fair value of the awards for Messrs. Roche, Farber, Lavey and Salvatore were increased to recognize their increased experience and significance to the long-term success of the Company and to reflect competitive pay levels after a review of Comparative Proxy Data and Comparative Market Data. Mr. Kerrigan’s target long-term incentive award for 2020 was agreed upon as a condition to Mr. Kerrigan joining the Company in early January.

2020 Long-Term Awards (Number of Shares Underlying Awards)*

NEO

ROE PBRSUs

(target)

RTSR PBRSUs

(target)

TBRSUs

Stock Options

 

 

 

 

 

John C. Roche

6,326

6,934

6,326

51,934

Jeffrey M. Farber

3,268

3,582

3,268

26,832

Richard W. Lavey

1,476

1,618

1,476

12,118

Bryan J. Salvatore

1,265

1,386

1,265

10,386

Dennis F. Kerrigan

1,054

1,155

1,054

8,655

 

*

Reflects initial issuance of restricted stock units and is not adjusted for subsequent accrual of dividend equivalents under the terms of these awards (see “Dividend Equivalents” below).

Description of RTSR PBRSUs

The RTSR PBRSUs:

 

are earned only to the extent that our three-year (2020-2022) total shareholder return as compared to the companies that comprise the PBRSU Comparison Group set forth below (“Relative Total Shareholder Return” or “RTSR”) places our performance above a certain percentile;

 

may be earned between 0% and 150% of the target award, based upon the level of RTSR achieved; and

 

are subject to a three-year time-based “cliff” vesting requirement (assuming achievement of performance goals, and continued employment through the vesting date, the RTSR PBRSUs vest on the third anniversary of the grant date).

The table below sets forth the level of RTSR required to achieve various payouts under the program:

RTSR

 

Percentage of Target Award Achieved†

 

 

 

≥75.0th %tile

 

150%

62.5th %tile

 

125%

50.0th %tile

 

100%

37.5th %tile

 

75%

25.0th %tile

 

50%

<25.0th %tile

 

0%

 

In the event that our total shareholder return is negative for the three-year period, payout is capped at 100% of the target award even if our RTSR is above the 50th percentile. If RTSR falls below the 25th percentile, but our total shareholder return exceeds our three-year compounded dividend yield during the period, payout will equal 25% of target.

THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP   2021 PROXY STATEMENT     36


 

RTSR PBRSU Comparison Group

•    American Financial Group, Inc.

•    Old Republic International Corporation

•    American International Group Inc.

•    ProAssurance Corporation

•    Argo Group International Holdings Ltd.

•    Prosight Global, Inc.

•    Axis Capital Holdings Limited

•    RLI Corp.

•    Chubb Limited

•    Safety Insurance Group, Inc.

•    Cincinnati Financial Corporation

•    Selective Insurance Group, Inc.

•    CNA Financial Corporation

•    State Auto Financial Corporation

•    Donegal Group Inc.

•    The Allstate Corporation

•    Horace Mann Educators Corporation

•    The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.

•    James River Group Holdings, Ltd.

•    The Travelers Companies, Inc.

•    Kemper Corporation

•    United Fire Group Inc.

•    Markel Corporation

•    W.R. Berkley Corporation

•    Mercury General Corporation

 

We chose the 25 companies listed above because we believe these companies are most representative of the companies against which we compete for business. This list is the same as the one used for the 2019 RTSR PBRSUs, except (i) Employers Holdings, Inc. and The Progressive Corporation were removed because of their relative size and their business mix; (ii) The Navigators Group, Inc. and EMC Insurance Group Inc. were removed due to the fact they were acquired; and (iii) Axis Capital Holdings Limited, James River Group Holdings, Ltd. and Prosight Global, Inc. were added because of their comparable size and their business mix. Although most of the companies that comprise our Comparative Proxy Data Companies are also included in this list, the Comparative Proxy Data Companies were specifically chosen because they are representative of the public companies against which we compete for executive talent.

The C&HCC chose RTSR as the performance metric with respect to PBRSUs to further align our NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders, to encourage a focus on long-term share price performance and to include a metric that explicitly measures our performance against other public companies in our industry.

Description of ROE PBRSUs