Litigation:	12 Months Ended
Dec. 29, 2012
Litigation:
Litigation:	11. Litigation: We are periodically a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes, based on discussions with legal counsel, that the resolution of any such lawsuits, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. In March 2012, we learned that the Jamba Juice Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action filed in the Federal Court for the North District of California and captioned Kevin Anderson v. Jamba Juice Company which claims that the use of the words “all natural” to describe the Smoothie Kits is misleading and deceptive to consumers and violates various California consumer protection statutes and unfair competition statutes. The suit is one of several “all natural” lawsuits recently brought against various food manufacturers and distributors in California. In an amended complaint the plaintiff also alleged violations of the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, but the court dismissed those claims in a ruling issued in August 2012. In a second amended complaint filed in September 2012, we were added as a defendant. Under our license agreement with the Jamba Juice Company, we are obligated and have agreed to indemnify and defend Jamba Juice in the suit, and Jamba has tendered defense of the claim to us. While we currently believe the “all natural” claims on the Smoothie Kits are not misleading and in full compliance with FDA guidelines, we are investigating the claims asserted in the action, and intend to vigorously defend against them. The plaintiff is seeking to certify a class of all persons in California who bought certain of the Jamba Juice Smoothie Kits, and the plaintiff’s deadline for filing a motion for class certification is April 1, 2013.

11. Litigation:

We are periodically a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes, based on discussions with legal counsel, that the resolution of any such lawsuits, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In March 2012, we learned that the Jamba Juice Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action filed in the Federal Court for the North District of California and captioned Kevin Anderson v. Jamba Juice Company which claims that the use of the words “all natural” to describe the Smoothie Kits is misleading and deceptive to consumers and violates various California consumer protection statutes and unfair competition statutes. The suit is one of several “all natural” lawsuits recently brought against various food manufacturers and distributors in California. In an amended complaint the plaintiff also alleged violations of the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, but the court dismissed those claims in a ruling issued in August 2012. In a second amended complaint filed in September 2012, we were added as a defendant. Under our license agreement with the Jamba Juice Company, we are obligated and have agreed to indemnify and defend Jamba Juice in the suit, and Jamba has tendered defense of the claim to us. While we currently believe the “all natural” claims on the Smoothie Kits are not misleading and in full compliance with FDA guidelines, we are investigating the claims asserted in the action, and intend to vigorously defend against them. The plaintiff is seeking to certify a class of all persons in California who bought certain of the Jamba Juice Smoothie Kits, and the plaintiff’s deadline for filing a motion for class certification is April 1, 2013.