-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, KmgHlxo9zbBuqhOEGrS/AMaDIjIbmAX9Qh4KR45cyJsVc1VepGWo6OwXxB7S5VFU DxfQ2x+X2WLTB9floRmMjg== 0000899243-03-000670.txt : 20030327 0000899243-03-000670.hdr.sgml : 20030327 20030327124950 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000899243-03-000670 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20021231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20030327 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000943861 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: CRUDE PETROLEUM & NATURAL GAS [1311] IRS NUMBER: 760466193 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-12719 FILM NUMBER: 03620208 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 815 WALKER STREET 2: SUITE 1040 CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TX ZIP: 77002 BUSINESS PHONE: 7137809494 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 815 WALKER STREET 2: SUITE 1040 CITY: HOUSTON STATE: TX ZIP: 77002 10-K 1 d10k.htm FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 Form 10-K for Year Ended December 31, 2002

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 

x   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Fee Required)

 

For Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002

Commission file number 1-7940

 

GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

76-0466193

(State of incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

808 Travis St., Suite 1320

 

77002

Houston, Texas

 

(Zip Code)

(Address of principal executive offices)

   

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code is (713) 780-9494

 

Title of each class


 

Name of each exchange

on which registered


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.20 par value

 

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Series A Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value

 

NASDAQ Small Cap

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x        No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

 

At March 15, 2003, there were 18,039,482 shares of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation common stock outstanding. The aggregate market value of shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 15, 2003, was approximately $21,235,000 based on a closing price of $3.66 per share on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨        No x

 

At June 28, 2002, the aggregate market value of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation common stock held by non-affiliates was $21,059,000.

 



PART I

 

Items 1 and 2.    Business and Properties.

 

General

 

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and subsidiaries (“Goodrich” or “the Company”) is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration, exploitation, development and production of oil and natural gas properties primarily in the transition zone of south Louisiana and in north Louisiana, the Gulf Coast of Texas and East Texas. The Company owns working interests in 99 active oil and gas wells located in 20 fields in four states. The Company also owns overriding royalty interest in five oil and gas wells. At December 31, 2002, Goodrich had estimated proved reserves of approximately 7.4 million barrels of oil and condensate and 29.1 billion cubic feet (“Bcf”) of natural gas, or an aggregate of 73.7 Bcf equivalent (“Bcfe”) with a pre-tax present value of future net revenues, discounted at 10%, of $151.4 million and an after-tax Standardized Measure value of $124.3 million.

 

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 808 Travis Street, Suite 1320, Houston, Texas 77002. The Company also has offices in Shreveport, Louisiana. At March 15, 2003, the Company had 37 employees.

 

Company Background

 

Goodrich resulted from a business combination on August 15, 1995 between La/Cal Energy Partners (“La/Cal”) and Patrick Petroleum Company and subsidiaries (“Patrick”). La/Cal was a privately held independent oil and gas partnership formed in July 1993 engaged in the development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties, primarily in southern Louisiana. Patrick was a NYSE listed independent oil and gas company engaged in the exploration, production, development and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties in the continental United States. Patrick’s oil and gas operations and properties were primarily located in West Texas and Michigan at the time of the combination, with additional operations and properties in certain western states.

 

Oil and Gas Operations and Properties

 

The following is a summary description of the Company’s oil and gas properties.

 

Louisiana

 

The majority of the Company’s proved oil and natural gas reserves are in the transition zone of the south Louisiana producing region. This region refers to the geographic area that covers the onshore and in-land waters of south Louisiana lying in the southern half of Louisiana, which is one of the most prolific oil and natural gas producing sedimentary basins. The region generally contains sedimentary sandstones, which are of high qualities of porosity and permeabilities. There is a myriad of types of reservoir traps found in the region. These traps are generally formed by faulting, folding and subsurface salt movement, or a combination of one or more of these.

 

The formations found in the southern Louisiana producing region range in depth from 1,000 feet to 20,000 feet below the surface. These formations range from the Sparta and Frio formations in the northern part of the region to Miocene and Pleistocene in the southern part of the region. The Company’s production comes predominately from Miocene and Frio age formations.

 

Burrwood and West Delta Fields.    The Burrwood and West Delta fields, located in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, were discovered in 1955 by Chevron. The fields lie upthrown to a large down-to-the southeast growth fault system with the structure striking northeast-southwest and dipping northwestward in a counter-regional direction. The fields have collectively produced over 49 million barrels of oil and 144 Bcf of natural gas. The

 

2


productive sands are Miocene and Pliocene age sands ranging in depth from 6,300 feet to approximately 11,700 feet. There are currently 19 active producing wells in the fields.

 

Goodrich acquired a 95% working interest in approximately 8,600 acres of the Burrwood and West Delta fields through an acquisition that closed on March 2, 2000 with an effective date of January 1, 2000. On March 12, 2002, the Company, in an effort to monetize a portion of the value created in the two fields and enhance its liquidity position, completed the sale of a thirty percent (30%) working interest in the existing production and shallow rights, and a fifteen percent (15%) working interest in the deep rights below 10,600 feet, in the fields for $12 million to Malloy Energy Company, LLC led by Patrick E. Malloy, III and participated in by Sheldon Appel, both members of the Company’s Board of Directors (Mr. Malloy is now Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors), as well as Josiah Austin, who subsequently became a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The sale price was determined by discounting the present value of the acquired interest in the fields’ proved, probable and possible reserves using prevailing oil and gas prices. The Company retains an approximate sixty-five percent (65%) working interest in the existing production and shallow rights, and a thirty-two and one-half percent (32.5%) working interest in the deep rights after the close of the transaction. In conjunction with the sale, the investor group provided a $7.7 million line of credit. The $7.7 million line of credit, which reduced to $5.0 million on January 1, 2003, is subordinate to the Company’s senior credit facility. The line of credit can be used for acquisitions, drilling, development and general corporate purposes until December 31, 2004. The investor group retains the option, through December 31, 2004, to convert the amount outstanding under the credit line, and/or provide cash on any unused credit to a maximum of $7.7 million in the first year, reduced to $5.0 million after December 31, 2002, into working interests in any acquisition(s) the Company may make in Louisiana prior to January 1, 2005. The conversion of the credit facility will be on a pro-rata basis with the Company and may not exceed a maximum of $7.7 million, reduced to $5.0 million after December 31, 2002, or thirty percent (30%) of any potential acquisition(s). To date, no borrowings have been made under the credit facility.

 

The Company recorded a non-recurring gain of approximately $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2002 as a result of the sale. The proceeds were used to reduce outstanding debt under its senior credit facility.

 

Lafitte Field.    The Lafitte field is located in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana and was discovered in 1935 by Texaco. The Lafitte field is a large, north-south elongated salt dome anticline feature. There are currently more than thirty (30) defined productive sands, which have collectively produced in excess of 264 million barrels of oil and 319 Bcf of natural gas. The productive sands are Miocene and Pliocene age sands ranging in depth from 3,000 feet to approximately 12,000 feet. There are currently 24 active producing wells in the field. In September 1999, the Company acquired a non-operated working interest of approximately 49% in the Lafitte field with respect to the field’s leases, surface facilities and equipment and a non-operated working interest of approximately 45% in the active producing wells. In November 1999, the Company acquired additional interests, resulting in a field-wide non-operated working interest of approximately 49%.

 

Second Bayou Field.    The Second Bayou field is located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana and was discovered in 1955 by the Sun Texas Company. Goodrich is the operator of eight producing wells, four of which are dually completed, and has an average working interest of approximately 29% in 1,395 gross acres. To date, the field has produced over 425 Bcf of natural gas and 3.6 million barrels of oil from multiple Miocene aged sands ranging from 4,000 to 15,200 feet.

 

Pecan Lake Field.    The Pecan Lake field was discovered in 1944 by the Superior Oil Company. Geologically, the field is comprised of a relatively low relief, four-way closure and multiple stacked pay sands. The Pecan Lake field comprises approximately 870 gross leased acres in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, approximately 42 miles southeast of Lake Charles, Louisiana. The field has produced from over 15 Miocene sands ranging in depths from 7,500 to 11,800 feet, which have been predominately gas and gas condensate reservoirs. These sand reservoirs are characterized by generally widespread development and strong waterdrive production mechanisms. The field has produced in excess of 354 Bcf of gas and 798,000 barrels of condensate. All of the field production to date has come from normal pressured reservoirs. The Company is the operator of four producing wells with working interests ranging from approximately 43% to 47%.

 

3


 

Isle St. Jean Charles Field.    Isle St. Jean Charles field is located in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana. The field is a northwest extension of the Bayou Jean LaCroix field located in the southeastern area of the Parish. These fields are trapped on a four-way closure, downthrown on a major east-west trending down to the south fault.

 

Production is from multiple Miocene-aged sands, which are normally pressured and range in depth from 9,000 feet to 13,000 feet. The field was developed primarily in the 1950’s by Exxon and reservoirs have exhibited both depletion and water drive mechanisms. To date, this field has produced in excess of 57 Bcf of gas and 6.61 million barrels of oil and condensate.

 

Goodrich acquired its approximate 34% working interest in its leasehold of approximately 425 acres through both acreage acquisitions and a farmout. The Company operates the one dually-completed well in the field.

 

Lake Raccourci Field.    The Lake Raccourci field located in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana was discovered by a predecessor to Exxon in 1949, with the field extended to the south by a predecessor to Amoco in 1958. Geologically, the field is a large four-way dipping closure, which is cross-cut by numerous northeast-southwest striking down to the south faults. The field has produced from a minimum of 18 different Miocene age sandstones, ranging in depth from 9,000 to 16,500 feet. These normally and abnormally pressured reservoirs exhibit depletion, water and combination drive mechanisms, and have produced in excess of 834 billion cubic feet of gas and 20 million barrels of oil and condensate.

 

Goodrich acquired its average 27% working interest in the field through a farmout from a predecessor to Apache in July 1996 and a separate farmout from Exxon. In December 2001, the Company purchased Exxon’s interest in one of the wells in the field. The Company controls approximately 1,079 acres in the field, which currently has seven producing wells.

 

Other.    The Company maintains ownership interests in acreage and wells in several additional fields in Louisiana, including the (i) Opelousas field, located in St. Landry Parish, (ii) Sibley field, located in Webster Parish, (iii) City of Lake Charles field, located in Calcasieu Parish, (iv) South Drew field, located in Ouachita Parish, (v) Mosquito Bay field, located in Terrebonne Parish, (vi) Kings Ridge field, located in Lafourche Parish, and (vii) Ada field, located in Bienville Parish

 

Texas

 

Goodrich explores and has production in the western, eastern and southern regions of Texas.

 

Sean Andrew Field.    The Sean Andrew field in Dawson County, Texas was discovered by the Company in 1994 utilizing the Company’s 375 square mile 3-D seismic database in West Texas. The Company is the operator of two wells in the field and holds an approximate 37.5% working interest.

 

Marholl Field.    The Marholl field is a Siluro-Devonian (Fussellman) field in Dawson County, Texas, discovered in 1995 through the use of 3-D seismic. The Company operates two wells in the field with an approximate 23% working interest.

 

Mary Blevins Field.    The Mary Blevins field is located in Smith County, Texas. It was a new discovery that is fault separated from Hitts Lake field, which was discovered in 1953 by Sun Oil. Currently there are four producing wells in the field in which Goodrich serves as operator, having an approximate 48% working interest in 782 gross acres. To date, Hitts Lake has produced over 14 million barrels of oil and Mary Blevins has produced over 551,000 barrels of oil from the Paluxy, which occurs at a depth of approximately 7,300 feet.

 

Other.    The Company maintains ownership interests in acreage and wells in several additional fields in Texas including the (i) Ackerly field, located in Dawson and Howard Counties, (ii) Lamesa Farms field, located in Dawson County, (iii) Midway field, located in San Patricio County, and (iv) Mott Slough field, located in Wharton County.

 

4


 

Australia

 

Goodrich has interests in two offshore exploration permits in the Carnarvon Basin of Western Australia.

 

The Carnarvon Basin is two-thirds the size of the Gulf of Mexico and has produced in excess of 4.3 TCF and 550 million barrels of oil from less than 1,000 wells. The Carnarvon Basin retains significant exploration potential. Additional strengths of the basin include large inexpensive acreage blocks, vast available geological and geophysical data sets, existing and expanding petroleum infrastructure and increasing domestic demands for natural gas.

 

EP-395.    Goodrich Petroleum has a 6.9% non-operated working interest in an approximate 240 square kilometer Exploration Permit. Since 1995 the partners have reprocessed the original 2-D seismic data sets, shot an approximate 38 square km 3-D seismic survey, and shot an approximate additional 93 km of high quality 2-D seismic.

 

EP-397.    This Permit covers 160 square kilometers in which the Company has a 33% non-operated working interest. The 130 km of available seismic has been reprocessed and interpreted with several prospect leads. The Company is scheduled to participate in a well on EP-397, its Banjo Prospect, during the first half of 2003. The Company has already paid its estimated share of the dry hole costs in escrow for the well in the amount of approximately $650,000.

 

Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

 

The following tables set forth summary information with respect to the Company’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, as estimated by the Company by compiling reserve information, substantially all of which was prepared by the engineering firm of Coutret and Associates, Inc.

 

    

Net Reserves


    

Pre-Tax Present

Value of Future

Net Revenues

(in millions)


    

After-Tax

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future

Net Revenues

(in millions)


Category


  

Oil (Bbls)


  

Gas (Mcf)


  

Bcfe(1)


         

December 31, 2002

                                

Proved Developed

  

2,556,670

  

15,203,255

  

30.5

    

$

68.06

        

Proved Undeveloped

  

4,884,670

  

13,866,295

  

43.2

    

 

83.30

        
    
  
  
    

        

Total Proved

  

7,441,340

  

29,069,550

  

73.7

    

$

151.36

    

$

124.3

    
  
  
    

    

December 31, 2001

                                

Proved Developed

  

3,399,610

  

16,692,390

  

37.1

    

$

42.39

        

Proved Undeveloped

  

5,350,810

  

17,263,860

  

49.4

    

 

36.50

        
    
  
  
    

        

Total Proved

  

8,750,420

  

33,956,250

  

86.5

    

$

78.89

    

$

73.12

    
  
  
    

    


(1)   Estimated by the Company using a conversion ratio of 1.0 Bbl/6.0 Mcf.

 

Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil, condensate and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. The quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered, production and operating costs, the amount and timing of future development expenditures and future oil and natural gas sales prices may all differ from those assumed in these estimates. Therefore, the pre-tax Present Value of Future Net Revenues amounts shown above should not be construed as the current market value of the estimated oil and natural gas reserves attributable to the Company’s properties.

 

5


 

In accordance with the guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the engineers’ estimates of future net revenues from the Company’s properties and the pre-tax Present Value of Future Net Revenues thereof are made using oil and natural gas sales prices in effect as of the dates of such estimates and are held constant throughout the life of the properties, except where such guidelines permit alternate treatment, including the use of fixed and determinable contractual price escalations. The prices as of December 31, 2002, and 2001 used in such estimates averaged $4.35 and $2.51 per Mcf, respectively, of natural gas and $28.80 and $17.91 per Bbl, respectively, of crude oil/condensate.

 

Productive Wells

 

The following table sets forth the number of active well bores in which the Company maintains ownership interests as of December 31, 2002:

 

    

Oil


  

Gas


  

Net


    

Gross(1)


  

Net(2)


  

Gross(1)


  

Net(2)


  

Gross(1)


  

Net(2)


Louisiana

  

46.00

  

23.39

  

30.00

  

12.43

  

76.00

  

35.82

Michigan

  

  

  

5.00

  

0.05

  

5.00

  

0.05

New Mexico

  

  

  

1.00

  

0.03

  

1.00

  

0.03

Texas

  

14.00

  

7.01

  

3.00

  

0.20

  

17.00

  

7.21

    
  
  
  
  
  

Total Productive Wells

  

60.00

  

30.40

  

39.00

  

12.71

  

99.00

  

43.11

    
  
  
  
  
  

(1)   Does not include royalty or overriding royalty interests.
(2)   Net working interest.

 

Productive wells consist of producing wells and wells capable of production, including gas wells awaiting pipeline connections. A gross well is a well in which the Company maintains an ownership interest, while a net well is deemed to exist when the sum of the fractional working interests owned by the Company equals one. Wells that are completed in more than one producing horizon are counted as one well. Of the gross wells reported above, seven had multiple completions.

 

Acreage

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s gross and net developed and undeveloped natural gas and oil acreage under lease as of December 31, 2002. Acreage in which the Company’s interest is limited to a royalty or overriding royalty interest is excluded from the table.

 

    

Gross


  

Net


Developed acreage

         

Louisiana

  

11,569

  

6,662

Michigan

  

1,920

  

19

Texas

  

1,181

  

440

New Mexico

  

640

  

19

Undeveloped acreage

         

Offshore Australia

  

98,841

  

17,306

Louisiana

  

7,331

  

3,633

Texas

  

499

  

263

    
  

Total

  

121,981

  

28,342

    
  

 

Undeveloped acreage is considered to be those lease acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to the extent that would permit the production of commercial quantities of natural gas or oil, regardless of whether or not such acreage contains proved reserves. As is customary in the oil and gas industry,

 

6


the Company can retain its interest in undeveloped acreage by drilling activity that establishes commercial production sufficient to maintain the leases or by payment of delay rentals during the remaining primary term of such a lease. The natural gas and oil leases in which the Company has an interest are for varying primary terms; however, most of the Company’s developed lease acreage is beyond the primary term and is held so long as natural gas or oil is produced.

 

Operator Activities

 

Goodrich Petroleum operates a majority in value of the Company’s producing properties, and will generally seek to become the operator of record on properties it drills or acquires in the future.

 

Drilling Activities

 

The following table sets forth the drilling activities of the Company for the last three years. (As denoted in the following table, “Gross” wells refers to wells in which a working interest is owned, while a “net” well is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross wells equals one.)

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


    

2002


  

2001


  

2000


    

Gross


  

Net


  

Gross


  

Net


  

Gross


  

Net


Development Wells:

                             

Productive

  

  

  

4.00

  

3.39

  

3.00

  

1.77

Non-Productive

  

  

  

  

  

1.00

  

49

    
  
  
  
  
  

Total

  

  

  

4.00

  

3.39

  

4.00

  

2.26

    
  
  
  
  
  

Exploratory Wells:

                             

Productive

  

2.00

  

1.13

  

1.00

  

17

  

2.00

  

93

Non-Productive

  

  

  

2.00

  

1.40

  

2.00

  

1.00

    
  
  
  
  
  

Total

  

2.00

  

1.13

  

3.00

  

1.57

  

4.00

  

1.93

    
  
  
  
  
  

Total Wells:

                             

Productive

  

2.00

  

1.13

  

5.00

  

3.56

  

5.00

  

2.70

Non-Productive

  

  

  

2.00

  

1.40

  

3.00

  

1.49

    
  
  
  
  
  

Total

  

2.00

  

1.13

  

7.00

  

4.96

  

8.00

  

4.19

    
  
  
  
  
  

 

7


 

Net Production, Unit Prices and Costs

 

The following table presents certain information with respect to oil, gas and condensate production attributable to the Company’s interests in all of its fields, the revenue derived from the sale of such production, average sales prices received and average production costs during each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002.

 

    

2002


  

2001


  

2000


Net Production:

                

Natural gas (Mcf)

  

 

2,477,790

  

3,823,227

  

3,394,921

Oil (barrels)

  

 

451,564

  

581,680

  

571,766

Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe) (1)

  

 

5,187,174

  

7,313,307

  

6,825,517

Average Net Daily Production:

                

Natural gas (Mcf)

  

 

6,788

  

10,475

  

9,301

Oil (Bbls)

  

 

1,237

  

1,594

  

1,566

Natural gas equivalents (Mcfe) (1)

  

 

14,211

  

20,039

  

18,697

Average Sales Price Per Unit (2):

                

Natural gas (per Mcf)

  

$

3.08

  

3.97

  

3.95

Oil (per Bbl)

  

$

25.09

  

24.67

  

25.55

Other Data:

                

Lease operating expense (per Mcfe) (3)

  

$

1.50

  

0.90

  

0.69

Production taxes (per Mcfe).

  

$

0.32

  

0.26

  

0.32

DD & A (per Mcfe)

  

$

1.05

  

0.94

  

0.87

Exploration (per Mcfe)

  

$

0.22

  

0.57

  

0.41


(1)   Estimated by the Company using a conversion ratio of 1.0 Bbl/6.0 Mcf.
(2)   See “Results of Operations” under Item 7 for discussion of the effects of hedging on results.
(3)   See “Results of Operations” under Item 7 for discussion of increase in lease operating expense in 2002.

 

The Company’s acquisition strategy calls for the acquisition of mature oil and gas fields with declining production profiles, established production histories and multiple productive sands that have been overlooked and/or starved of capital. Acquisitions of this type generally require significant lease operation, exploration and capital expenditure cash outlays during initial years of ownership. The Company’s Lafitte, Burrwood and West Delta fields acquisitions in late 1999 and early 2000, were strategic acquisitions that fit the aforementioned profile, and account for the increased unit costs noted above in the periods presented above.

 

Oil and Gas Marketing and Major Customers

 

Marketing.    Goodrich’s natural gas production is sold under spot or market-sensitive contracts to various gas purchasers on short-term contracts. Goodrich’s natural gas condensate is sold under short-term rollover agreements based on current market prices. The Company’s crude oil production is marketed to several purchasers based on short-term contracts.

 

Customers.    Due to the nature of the industry, the Company sells its oil and natural gas production to a limited number of purchasers and, accordingly, amounts receivable from such purchasers could be significant. Revenues from these sources as a percent of total revenues for the periods presented were as follows:

 

    

Year Ended

December 31,


 
    

2002


      

2001


      

2000


 

Reliant Energy

  

45

%

    

56

%

    

48

%

Conoco, Inc

  

17

%

    

 

    

 

Shell Trading

  

17

%

    

 

    

 

Genesis Crude Oil, L.P.

  

5

%

    

22

%

    

27

%

Gulfmark Energy, Inc.

  

 

    

 

    

10

%

 

8


 

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company contracted with Louis Dreyfus Corporation as its major gas purchaser in lieu of Reliant Energy.

 

Competition

 

The oil and gas industry is highly competitive. Major and independent oil and gas companies, drilling and production acquisition programs and individual producers and operators are active bidders for desirable oil and gas properties, as well as the equipment and labor required to operate those properties. Many competitors have financial resources substantially greater than those of the Company, and staffs and facilities substantially larger than those of the Company. The availability of a ready market for the oil and gas production of the Company will depend in part on the cost and availability of alternative fuels, the level of consumer demand, the extent of domestic production of oil and gas, the extent of importation of foreign oil and gas, the cost of and proximity to pipelines and other transportation facilities, regulations by state and federal authorities and the cost of complying with applicable environmental regulations.

 

Regulations

 

The availability of a ready market for any natural gas and oil production depends upon numerous factors beyond the Company’s control. These factors include regulation of natural gas and oil production, federal and state regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control, state limits on allowable rates of production by a well or proration unit, the amount of natural gas and oil available for sale, the availability of adequate pipeline and other transportation and processing facilities and the marketing of competitive fuels. For example, a productive natural gas well may be “shut-in” because of an oversupply of natural gas or the lack of an available natural gas pipeline in the areas in which the Company may conduct operations. State and federal regulations generally are intended to prevent waste of natural gas and oil, protect rights to produce natural gas and oil between owners in a common reservoir, control the amount of natural gas and oil produced by assigning allowable rates of production and control contamination of the environment. Pipelines are subject to the jurisdiction of various federal, state and local agencies as well.

 

Environmental Regulation

 

Various federal, state and local laws and regulations covering the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, may affect the Company’s operations and costs as a result of their effect on oil and gas development, exploration and production operations. It is not anticipated that the Company will be required in the near future to expend amounts that are material in relation to its total capital expenditures program by reason of environmental laws and regulations but, inasmuch as such laws and regulations are frequently changed by both federal and state agencies, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate cost of continued compliance. Additionally, see existing EPA matters discussed in Item 3—Legal Proceedings.

 

State statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. In addition, there are state statutes, rules and regulations governing conservation matters, including the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells and the spacing, plugging and abandonment of such wells. Such statutes and regulations may limit the rate at which oil and gas could otherwise be produced from the Company’s properties and may restrict the number of wells that may be drilled on a particular lease or in a particular field.

 

Risk Factors

 

The Company’s Success is Dependent on Oil and Gas Prices.    Goodrich’s success will depend on the market prices of oil and gas. These market prices tend to fluctuate significantly in response to factors beyond the

 

9


Company’s control. The prices the Company receives for its crude oil production are based on global market conditions. The continued threat of war in the Middle East, the continuing economic crisis in Venezuela (a major oil exporter), and actions of OPEC and its maintenance of production constraints, as well as other economic, political, and environmental factors will continue to affect world supply. Natural gas prices fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors including the U.S. economic environment, North American weather patterns, other factors affecting demand such as substitute fuels, the impact of drilling levels on crude oil and natural gas supply, and the environmental and access issues that limit future drilling activities for the industry.

 

The year 2002 began with lower commodity prices as a result of the global economic downturn and decreases in demand. During 2002, crude oil prices increased due to a combination of factors including fears of war in Iraq (and the resulting impact on the Middle East), Venezuelan strikes that reduced oil exports, and continued OPEC production discipline. Natural gas prices also increased throughout 2002 as U.S. productive capacity declined and as demand increased in the fourth quarter due, in part, to below–normal temperatures. Commodity prices ended the year at their highest levels and have remained strong in 2003. The Company expects that commodity prices will continue to fluctuate significantly in the future.

 

Changes in commodity prices significantly affect the Company’s capital resources, liquidity and expected operating results. Price changes directly affect revenues and can indirectly impact expected production by changing the amount of funds available to reinvest in exploration and development activities. Reductions in oil and gas prices not only reduce revenues and profits, but could also reduce the quantities of reserves that are commercially recoverable. Significant declines in prices could result in non–cash charges to earnings due to impairment. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to hedge its exposure to price risk from changing commodity prices and the Company has hedged a substantial portion of its anticipated production for 2003.

 

The Company’s Operations Require Significant Capital Expenditures.    Goodrich must make a substantial amount of capital expenditures for the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves. Historically, the Company has paid for these expenditures with cash from operating activities, proceeds from debt and equity financings and asset sales. Goodrich’s revenues or cash flows could be reduced because of lower oil and gas prices or for other reasons. If Goodrich’s revenues or cash flows decrease, the Company may not have the funds available to replace reserves or to maintain production at current levels. If this occurs, the Company’s production will decline over time. Other sources of financing may not be available if Goodrich’s cash flows from operations are not sufficient to fund its capital expenditure requirements. Where Goodrich is not the majority owner or operator of an oil and gas property, such as the Lafitte field, it may have no control over the timing or amount of capital expenditures associated with the particular property. If Goodrich cannot fund its capital expenditures, its interests in some properties may be reduced or forfeited.

 

The Company’s Oil and Gas Reserve Information Is Estimated.    The proved oil and gas reserve information included in this document represents estimates. These estimates are based on reports prepared by consulting reserve engineers and were calculated using oil and gas prices as of December 31, 2002. These prices could change. Petroleum engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. Estimates of economically recoverable oil and gas reserves and of future net cash flows necessarily depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, including:

 

    historical production from the area compared with production from other similar producing areas;

 

    the assumed effects of regulations by governmental agencies;

 

    assumptions concerning future oil and gas prices; and

 

    assumptions concerning future operating costs, severance and excise taxes, development costs and workover and remedial costs.

 

10


 

Because all reserve estimates are to some degree subjective, each of the following items may differ materially from those assumed in estimating reserves:

 

    the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered;

 

    the production and operating costs incurred;

 

    the amount and timing of future development expenditures; and

 

    future oil and gas sales prices.

 

Furthermore, different reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash flows based on the same available data. Goodrich’s actual production, revenues and expenditures with respect to reserves will likely be different from estimates and the differences may be material. The discounted future net cash flows included in this document should not be considered as the current market value of the estimated oil and gas reserves attributable to Goodrich’s properties. As required by the SEC, the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves are generally based on prices and costs as of the date of the estimate, while actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower. Actual future net cash flows also will be affected by factors such as:

 

    the amount and timing of actual production;

 

    supply and demand for oil and gas;

 

    increases or decreases in consumption; and

 

    changes in governmental regulations or taxation.

 

In addition, the 10% discount factor, which is required by the SEC to be used to calculate discounted future net cash flows for reporting purposes, is not necessarily the most appropriate discount factor based on interest rates in effect from time to time and risks associated with the Company or the oil and gas industry in general.

 

Oil and Gas Operations Are Subject to Various Economic Risks.    The oil and gas operations of Goodrich are subject to the economic risks typically associated with exploration, development and production activities, including the necessity of significant expenditures to locate and acquire properties and to drill exploratory wells. In conducting exploration and development activities, the presence of unanticipated pressure or irregularities in formations, miscalculations or accidents may cause Goodrich’s exploration, development and production activities to be unsuccessful. This could result in a total loss of Goodrich’s investment in a particular property. If exploration efforts are unsuccessful in establishing proved reserves and exploration activities cease, the amounts accumulated as unproved costs would be charged against earnings as impairments. In addition, the cost and timing of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain.

 

Drilling Oil and Gas Wells Could Involve Blowouts, Environmental Hazards and Other Risks.    The nature of the oil and gas business involves certain operating hazards such as well blowouts, cratering, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids, fires, formations with abnormal pressures, pollution, releases of toxic gas and other environmental hazards and risks. Any of these operating hazards could result in substantial losses to Goodrich. As a result, substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities may be incurred. The payment of these amounts could reduce or eliminate the funds available for exploration, development or acquisitions. These reductions in funds could result in a loss of Goodrich’s properties. Additionally, some of Goodrich’s oil and gas operations are located in areas that are subject to weather disturbances such as hurricanes. Some of these disturbances can be severe enough to cause substantial damage to facilities and possibly interrupt production. In accordance with customary industry practices, Goodrich maintains insurance against some, but not all, of such risks and losses. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on the financial position and results of operations of Goodrich.

 

11


 

Competition Within the Oil and Gas Industry is Intense.    The exploration and production business is highly competitive. Many of Goodrich’s competitors have substantially larger financial resources, staffs and facilities than Goodrich. These competitors include other independent oil and gas producers, as well as major oil companies.

 

Government Agencies Can Increase Costs and Can Terminate or Suspend Operations.    Goodrich’s business is subject to foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the exploration for, and the development, production and transportation of, oil and gas, as well as environmental and safety matters. Many of these laws and regulations have become stricter in recent years. These laws and regulations often impose greater liability on a larger number of potentially responsible parties. Under some circumstances, the State of Louisiana may require the operations of Goodrich on state leases to be suspended or terminated. These circumstances include Goodrich’s failure to pay royalties, Goodrich’s failure to comply with safety and environmental regulations. This could have a material adverse effect on Goodrich’s financial condition and operations.

 

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has identified the Company as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for the cost of clean-up of “hazardous substances” at an oil field waste disposal site in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. The Company estimates that the remaining cost of long-term clean-up of the site will be approximately $3.5 million, with the Company’s percentage of responsibility estimated to be approximately 3.05%. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had paid $321,000 in costs related to this matter and accrued $122,500 for the remaining liability. These costs have not been discounted to their present value. The EPA and the PRPs will continue to evaluate the site and revise estimates for the long-term clean-up of the site. There can be no assurance that the cost of clean-up and the Company’s percentage responsibility will not be higher than currently estimated. In addition, under the federal environmental laws, the liability costs for the clean-up of the site is joint and several among all PRPs. Therefore, the ultimate cost of the clean-up to the Company could be significantly higher than the amount presently estimated or accrued for this liability.

 

On February 8, 2000, the Company commenced a suit against the operator and joint owner of the Lafitte field, alleging certain items of misconduct and violations of the agreements associated primarily with the joint acquisition of and unfettered access to a license to 3-D seismic data over the field. The operator has counter-claimed against Goodrich on the grounds that Goodrich was obligated to post a bond to secure the plugging and abandonment obligations in the field. On November 1, 2002 the 125th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, ruled in favor of the Company stating (1) The Sale and Assignment between the Company and the operator assigned the same rights to the 3-D seismic data that the operator had pursuant to the operator’s data use license agreement from Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc. (“TEPI”); and (2) Also pursuant to the terms of the Sale and Assignment, Goodrich is required to post 49% of the bond liability to TEPI at such time that TEPI requests it. The Court has not determined whether TEPI has already issued the request that would require the Company to post 49% of the bond liability to TEPI. However, in a statement to the Court, TEPI stated that whatever may be the obligation between the operator and Goodrich regarding the requirement, if any, for Goodrich to post a bond in favor of the operator covering Goodrich’s P&A obligations, TEPI does not claim that it is entitled to any bond unless and until the operator’s total shareholder value (as defined in the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the operator and TEPI) falls below $80 million. The damages portion of the suit is ongoing and it is too early to predict a likely outcome, however, this action is not expected to have a significantly adverse impact on the operations or financial position of the Company.

 

The Company is party to additional lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. The Company intends to defend these actions vigorously and believes, based on currently available information, that adverse results or judgments from such actions, if any, will not be material to its financial position or results of operations.

 

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

 

None.

 

12


 

PART II

 

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.

 

The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GDP”.

 

At March 15, 2003 the number of holders of record of the Company’s common stock without determination of the number of individual participants in security position was 1,648 with 18,039,482 shares outstanding. High and low sales prices for the Company’s common stock for each quarter during the calendar years 2002 and 2001 are as follows:

 

    

2002


  

2001


Quarter Ended


  

High


  

Low


  

High


  

Low


March 31

  

$

4.63

  

3.65

  

$

6.50

  

4.88

June 30

  

$

4.88

  

3.60

  

$

6.75

  

5.80

September 30

  

$

3.65

  

2.70

  

$

5.83

  

4.80

December 31

  

$

3.01

  

2.05

  

$

5.35

  

3.71

 

The Company has not paid a cash dividend on its common stock and does not intend to pay such a dividend in the foreseeable future.

 

13


 

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data.

 

Selected Statement of Operations Data:

 

The following table sets forth selected financial data of the Company for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2002, which information has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements. This information should be read in connection with and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information in the Company’s financial statements under Item 8 below and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations.”

 

   

Year Ended December 31,


 
   

2002


    

2001


    

2000


    

1999


    

1998


 

Revenues

 

$

19,099,929

 

  

29,894,779

 

  

28,489,391

 

  

14,020,574

 

  

10,591,873

 

Lease Operating Expense and Production Taxes

 

 

9,421,375

 

  

8,441,973

 

  

6,913,968

 

  

3,591,427

 

  

2,821,515

 

Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization

 

 

5,452,341

 

  

6,844,751

 

  

5,953,641

 

  

4,743,608

 

  

4,094,447

 

Exploration

 

 

1,128,855

 

  

4,174,436

 

  

2,813,332

 

  

1,656,158

 

  

6,010,425

 

General and Administrative

 

 

4,467,641

 

  

3,134,865

 

  

2,518,228

 

  

1,989,703

 

  

2,399,332

 

Interest Expense

 

 

985,185

 

  

1,290,681

 

  

4,390,331

 

  

2,810,576

 

  

1,909,849

 

Total Costs and Expenses

 

 

21,797,476

 

  

25,687,242

 

  

24,712,518

 

  

15,330,062

 

  

18,311,421

 

Gain (Loss) on sale of assets

 

 

2,941,062

 

  

26,779

 

  

307,299

 

  

(519,495

)

  

4,206

 

Income taxes

 

 

88,648

 

  

1,487,070

 

  

(1,655,032

)

  

 

  

 

Net Income (Loss)

 

 

154,867

 

  

2,747,246

 

  

5,739,204

 

  

(1,828,983

)

  

(7,715,342

)

Preferred Stock Dividends

 

 

639,753

 

  

3,002,872

 

  

1,193,768

 

  

1,249,343

 

  

1,255,638

 

Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Stock

 

 

(484,886

)

  

(255,626

)

  

4,545,436

 

  

(3,078,326

)

  

(8,970,980

)

Basic Income (Loss) Per Average Common Share

 

$

(.03

)

  

(.01

)

  

.46

 

  

(.58

)

  

(1.71

)

Diluted Income (Loss) Per Average Common Share

 

$

(.03

)

  

(.01

)

  

.35

 

  

(.58

)

  

(1.71

)

Average Common Shares Outstanding Basic

 

 

17,908,182

 

  

17,351,375

 

  

9,903,248

 

  

5,288,011

 

  

5,243,105

 

Average Common Shares Outstanding Diluted

 

 

17,908,182

 

  

17,351,375

 

  

13,116,641

 

  

5,288,011

 

  

5,243,105

 

   

December 31,


 
   

2002


    

2001


    

2000


    

1999


    

1998


 

Selected Balance Sheet Data:

                                   

Total Assets

 

$

80,765,974

 

  

82,243,931

 

  

65,343,594

 

  

56,258,552

 

  

44,036,588

 

Total Long Term Debt

 

 

18,500,000

 

  

24,500,000

 

  

22,965,000

 

  

36,953,117

 

  

29,500,000

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

$

46,806,116

 

  

47,920,547

 

  

32,605,216

 

  

6,411,044

 

  

4,959,388

 

 

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

General

 

The Company was created by the combination of Patrick Petroleum Company (“Patrick”) and La/Cal Energy Partners, a partnership in which it had a controlling interest (“La/Cal”), in August 1995. The combination was a reverse merger in which the Company’s current management gained control of the combined company, renamed it Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and assumed Patrick’s New York Stock Exchange listing.

 

Results of Operations

 

Year ended December 31, 2002 versus year ended December 31, 2001—Total revenues in 2002 amounted to $19,100,000 and were $10,796,000 (36%) lower than total revenues in 2001 due primarily to a 30% decline in

 

14


production volumes resulting largely from the sale of thirty percent (30%) of Burrwood and West Delta fields on March 12, 2002 and lower natural gas prices, partially offset by slightly higher oil prices. Oil and gas sales were $18,969,000 for the twelve months ended 2002, compared to $29,542,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001, or $10,573,000 lower due to lower oil and gas production volumes, primarily the result of the sale of a thirty percent (30%) interest in the Burrwood and West Delta fields. Oil and gas revenues were also reduced during the period due to a majority of the Company’s oil and gas production being shut in temporarily as a result of Hurricane Isidore and Hurricane Lili in September and October 2002. Oil sales were reduced by $274,000 and gas sales were reduced by $739,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to reductions of $89,000 for oil sales and $972,000 for gas sales in the year ended December 31, 2001 as a result of settlement of the Company’s outstanding oil and gas futures contracts. The Company recorded a gain of $2,941,000 primarily due to the sale of thirty percent (30%) interest in the Burrwood and West Delta fields for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, compared to a gain of $27,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001.

 

The following table reflects the production volumes and pricing information for the periods presented:

 

    

2002


  

2001


    

Production


    

Average Price


  

Production


    

Average Price


Gas (Mcf)

  

2,477,790

    

$

3.08

  

3,823,227

    

$

3.97

Oil (Bbls)

  

451,564

    

$

25.09

  

581,680

    

$

24.67

 

Lease operating expense was $7,757,000 for 2002 compared to $6,576,000 for 2001, or $1,181,000 higher, due primarily to significantly increased costs associated with salt water disposal in the Burrwood and West Delta fields, final billings from the prior operator of the Company’s Second Bayou field, higher well insurance costs and transition costs associated with the Company assuming operations of its oil and gas properties from a contract operator on June 1, 2002, partially offset by the sale of a thirty percent (30%) working interest in the Burrwood and West Delta fields on March 12, 2002. Work was completed at the end of the second quarter to alleviate higher costs associated with compression and salt water disposal. Production taxes in 2002 were $1,664,000 compared to $1,866,000 or $202,000 lower due to lower oil and gas sales during 2002. Depletion, depreciation and amortization was $5,452,000 in 2002 versus $6,845,000 in 2001, or $1,393,000 lower, due primarily to lower production volumes in 2002 versus 2001.

 

The Company incurred $1,129,000 of exploration expense in 2002 compared to $4,174,000 in 2001, or $3,045,000 lower, due primarily to dry hole and seismic costs of $-0- and $130,000 respectively in 2002, compared to $1,604,000 and $994,000 respectively in 2001.

 

The Company recorded an impairment in the recorded value of certain oil and gas properties in 2002 in the amount of $342,000 due primarily to a sooner than anticipated depletion of reserves in non-core fields. This compares to an impairment of $1,801,000 recorded in 2001.

 

General and administrative expenses amounted to $4,468,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 versus $3,135,000 in 2001 or $1,333,000 higher, due primarily to legal costs of $983,000 attributable to litigation against the operator and joint owner of the Company’s Lafitte field and added salaries associated with the Company assuming operations from its contract operator.

 

Interest expense was $985,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 compared to $1,291,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2001, or $306,000 lower, due primarily to lower average debt outstanding, reflecting debt reduction from proceeds of a property sale, and a lower average effective interest rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. The 2002 amount includes $223,000 of non cash expenses associated with the amortization of deferred debt financing costs and amortization of the discount associated with the production payment liability recorded in connection with the Lafitte field acquisition. These non-cash expenses totaled $242,000 in 2001.

 

15


 

The Company recorded deferred tax expense (not requiring current cash payment) of $89,000 in 2002 compared to the recording of a deferred tax expense of $1,487,000 in 2001 based primarily on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards.

 

Preferred stock dividends were $640,000 in 2002 compared to $3,003,000 in 2001. In 2002, such amount consisted solely of cash dividends paid on the Company’s Series A preferred stock whereas the 2001 amount includes cash dividends paid on the Company’s Series A preferred stock in the amount of $626,000, as well as a non-cash charge related to the conversion of the Company’s Series B preferred stock into common stock in the amount of $2,377,000.

 

Year ended December 31, 2001 versus year ended December 31, 2000 —Total revenues in 2001 amounted to $29,895,000 and were $1,406,000 (5%) higher than total revenues in 2000 due primarily to higher oil and gas sales. Oil and gas sales were $29,542,000 for the twelve months ended 2001, compared to $28,014,000, or $1,528,000 higher due to higher oil and gas production volumes partially offset by lower oil prices. Oil sales were reduced by $89,000 and gas sales were reduced by $972,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to reductions of $2,461,000 for oil sales and $441,000 for gas sales in the year ended December 31, 2000 as a result of settlement of the Company’s outstanding futures contracts. The Company recorded a gain on the sale of certain non-core oil and gas properties of $27,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 compared to a gain of $307,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2000.

 

The following table reflects the production volumes and pricing information for the periods presented:

 

    

2001


  

2000


    

Production


    

Average Price


  

Production


    

Average Price


Gas (Mcf)

  

3,823,227

    

$

3.97

  

3,394,921

    

$

3.95

Oil (Bbls)

  

581,680

    

$

24.67

  

571,766

    

$

25.55

 

Lease operating expense was $6,576,000 for 2001 compared to $4,695,000 for 2000, or $1,881,000 higher, due primarily to a full twelve months of costs at Burrwood and West Delta fields in the 2001 period, compared to ten months in the prior period and an increased number of net properties. Production taxes in 2001 were $1,866,000 compared to $2,219,000 or $353,000 lower due to severance tax exemptions received on certain production in the Burrwood and West Delta fields. Depletion, depreciation and amortization was $6,845,000 in 2001 versus $5,954,000 in 2000, or $891,000 higher, due to increased oil and gas production.

 

The Company incurred $4,174,000 of exploration expense in 2001 compared to $2,813,000 in 2000, or $1,361,000 higher, due primarily to dry hole and seismic costs of $1,604,000 and $994,000 respectively in 2001, compared to $796,000 and $475,000 respectively in 2000.

 

The Company recorded an impairment in the recorded value of certain oil and gas properties in 2001 in the amount of $1,801,000 due primarily to a sooner than anticipated depletion of reserves in two non-core fields. This compares to an impairment of $1,835,000 recorded in 2000.

 

General and administrative expenses amounted to $3,135,000 for 2001 versus $2,518,000 in 2000 with the increase due mostly to higher legal expenses.

 

Interest expense was $1,291,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2001 compared to $4,390,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2000, or $3,099,000 lower, due primarily to lower average debt outstanding and a lower average effective interest rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2001. The 2001 amount includes $242,000 of non cash expenses associated with the amortization of deferred debt financing costs and amortization of the discount associated with the production payment liability recorded in connection with the Lafitte field acquisition. The 2000 amount includes $919,000 of non cash expenses associated with the amortization of financing costs and debt discount in connection with the September 1999 private placement and amortization of the discount associated with the production payment liability recorded in connection with the Lafitte field acquisition.

 

16


 

The Company recorded deferred tax expense (not requiring cash payment) of $1,487,000 in 2001 compared to the recording of a deferred tax benefit of $1,655,000 in 2000.

 

During 2001 the Company paid dividends of $626,000 on its Series A preferred stock. Also in 2001, the Company exchanged each share of its Series B preferred stock for 1.8 shares of its common stock and recorded a conversion premium on the income statement as dividends, of $2,377,000 to reflect the excess of the 1.8 conversion factor over the terms of the original preferred stock issuance. For the period ended December 31, 2000, the Company paid an aggregate of approximately $1.8 million of dividend arrearages and $580,000 of regular quarterly (third and fourth quarter 2000) dividends on its outstanding series of preferred stock. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company was current as to dividends on its preferred stock. The Company also accrued non-cash dividends on its Goodrich—Louisiana Series A Preferred units, prior to conversion, of $38,000 that is reflected as preferred dividends of subsidiary in the statement of operations for the 2000 period.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $5,349,000 or 66% lower due primarily to lower production volumes, the majority of which was due to the sale of thirty percent (30%) of the Burrwood and West Delta fields in 2002, compared to $15,790,000 in 2001 and $12,641,000 in 2000. The accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows identify major differences between net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities for each of the years presented.

 

Net cash provided by investing activities amounted to $4,743,000 consisting of $8,079,000 of capital expenditures and $12,823,000 in proceeds from the sale of oil and gas properties in 2002 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $31,846,000 in 2001 and $15,881,000 in 2000. In 2002 the Company participated in the drilling of only two wells, whereas in 2001, a total of seven wells were drilled. Net cash used in investing activities for 2001 consists of capital expenditures of $32,253,000 and proceeds from the sale of oil and gas properties and equipment of $407,000. Net cash used in investing activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2000, reflects capital expenditures totaling $15,142,000, cash paid in connection with the acquisition of oil and gas properties of $1,199,000 and proceeds from the sale of oil and gas properties of $460,000. For 2003, the Company anticipates making capital expenditures totaling approximately $20 million, which will be primarily directed toward the drilling of up to fifteen gross wells. The Company expects to finance its capital expenditures out of operating cash flow and available bank credit, as further described below.

 

Net cash used in financing activities was $6,989,000 in 2002 compared to $12,772,000 provided in 2001 and $842,000 provided in 2000. The 2002 amounts consist of pay downs by the Company under its line of credit of $13,500,000. The 2002 amounts also include proceeds from bank borrowings of $7,500,000, preferred stock dividends of $640,000 and the exercise of employee stock options of $28,000. The 2002 amount also includes production payments of $378,000. The 2001 amount consists of proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $15,000,000 and pay downs by the Company under its line of credit of $13,690,000. The 2001 amount also includes proceeds from bank borrowings of $15,225,000, the payment of debt financing and public offering costs of $1,984,000, changes in restricted cash of $799,000, and production payments of $545,000. In addition, the 2001 amount includes preferred stock dividends of $626,000 and proceeds from the exercise of stock warrants and employee stock options of $180,000 and $12,000, respectively. The 2000 amount includes proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $9,150,000 and paydowns by the Company under its line of credit of $4,125,000. The 2000 amount includes preferred stock dividends of $2,308,000, changes in restricted cash of $1,240,000 and proceeds from the exercise of stock purchase warrants and director and employee stock options of $451,000. The 2000 amount also includes production payments of $653,000 and payment of debt and equity financing costs of $432,000.

 

Credit Facility

 

On November 9, 2001 the Company established a $50,000,000 credit facility with BNP Paribas, with an initial borrowing base of $25,000,000. The current borrowing base of $23,000,000 will remain effective until the

 

17


next borrowing base redetermination, which is scheduled to be made on or before March 31, 2003. Interest on borrowings will accrue at a rate calculated, at the option of the Company, as either the BNP Paribas base rate plus 0.00% to 0.50%, or LIBOR plus 1.50%—2.50%, depending on borrowing base utilization. Interest on LIBOR-rate borrowings is due and payable on the last day of its respective interest period. Accrued interest on each base-rate borrowing is due and payable on the last day of each quarter. The credit facility will mature on November 8, 2004. The credit facility requires that the Company pay a 0.375% per annum commitment fee, payable in quarterly installments based on the Company’s borrowing base utilization. Prior to maturity, no payments are required so long as the maximum borrowing base amount exceeds the amounts outstanding under the credit facility. The credit facility requires the Company to monitor tangible net worth and maintain certain financial statement ratios at certain levels. Substantially all the Company’s assets are pledged to secure the credit facility. Borrowings under the credit facility amounted to $18,500,000 at December 31, 2002, and were subsequently increased to $20,000,000 as of March 15, 2003.

 

Burrwood and West Delta Field Performance Bond and Escrow Account

 

In connection with the March 2, 2000 Burrwood and West Delta fields acquisition, the Company secured a performance bond and established an escrow account to be used for the payment of obligations associated with the plugging and abandonment of the wells, salvage and removal of platforms and related equipment, and the site restoration of the fields. The fully funded escrow account in the amount of $2,039,000 is shown on the Balance Sheet as restricted cash.

 

Contractual Obligations and Guarantees—The Company is obligated to make future cash payments under its borrowing agreements. Total principal payments due after 2002 under such contractual obligations are shown below.

 

    

Amount Due


(Millions of dollars)

  

Total


  

2003


  

2004-2006


    

2007-2008


    

After 2008


Long-term debt

  

$

18.5

  

  

18.5

    

    

Production Payment

  

$

1.2

  

0.5

  

0.7

    

    

 

Accounting Matters

 

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”) immediately upon release and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”) on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and that certain acquired intangible assets in a business combination be recognized and reported as assets apart from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 requires that amortization of goodwill be replaced with periodic tests of the goodwill’s impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142 and that intangible assets other than goodwill be amortized over their useful lives. The Company does not have any identified intangible assets nor any goodwill as of December 31, 2002 or December 31, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 and 142 had no significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires the Company to record a liability equal to the fair value of the estimated cost to retire an asset. The asset retirement liability must be recorded in the periods in which the obligation meets the definition of a liability, which is generally when the asset is placed in service. When the liability is initially recorded, the Company will increase the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by an amount equal to the original liability. The liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related long-lived asset. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003, the Company will recognize transition adjustments for existing asset retirement obligations, long-lived assets and accumulated depreciation, all net of related income tax effects, as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. After adoption, any difference between costs incurred upon settlement of an asset retirement obligation and the recorded liability

 

18


will be recognized as a gain or loss in the Company’s earnings. The Company is currently unable to determine the effect of adopting SFAS No. 143 on its financial statements.

 

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which supercedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual, and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. The Company adopted the provision of SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 had no impact on the Company.

 

The Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 02-3 in the fourth quarter 2002. This consensus requires that the results of energy trading activities be recorded on a net margin basis. The adoption had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirement for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an Interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. This Interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. The Interpretation also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of the Interpretation are applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002.

 

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements. Certain of the disclosure modifications are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002.

 

Critical accounting policies—In preparing the financial statements of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management must make a number of estimates and assumptions related to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Application of certain of the Company’s accounting policies requires a significant amount of estimates. These accounting policies are described below.

 

   

Proved oil and natural gas reserves—Proved reserves are defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as those volumes of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty are recoverable from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are volumes expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Although the Company’s external engineers are knowledgeable of and follow the guidelines for reserves as established by the SEC, the estimation of reserves requires the engineers to make a significant number of assumptions based on professional judgment. Estimated reserves are often subject to future revision, certain of which could be substantial, based on the availability of additional information, including: reservoir performance, new geological and geophysical data, additional drilling, technological advancements, price changes and other economic factors. Changes in oil and natural gas prices can lead to a decision to start-up or shut-in production, which can lead to revisions to reserve quantities. Reserve revisions inherently lead to adjustments of depreciation rates utilized by the

 

19


 

Company. The Company cannot predict the types of reserve revisions that will be required in future periods.

 

    Successful efforts accounting—The Company utilizes the successful efforts method to account for exploration and development expenditures. Unsuccessful exploration wells are expensed and can have a significant effect on operating results. Successful exploration drilling costs and all development capital expenditures are capitalized and systematically charged to expense using the units of production method based on proved developed oil and natural gas reserves as estimated by engineers. The Company also uses proved developed reserves for calculating the amount of expense to recognize for future estimated dismantlement and abandonment costs.

 

    Impairment of properties—The Company continually monitors its long-lived assets recorded in Property, Plant and Equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheet to make sure that they are presented fairly and accurately. The Company must evaluate its properties for potential impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset could exceed its fair value. Performing these evaluations requires a significant amount of judgment since the results are based on estimated future events. Such events include a projection of future oil and natural gas sales prices, an estimate of the ultimate amount of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves that will be produced from a field, the timing of this future production, future costs to produce the oil and natural gas, and future inflation levels. The need to test a property for impairment can be based on several factors, including a significant reduction in sales prices for oil and/or natural gas, unfavorable adjustments to reserves, or other changes to contracts, environmental regulations or tax laws. The Company cannot predict the amount of impairment charges that may be recorded in the future.

 

    Income taxes—The Company is subject to income and other related taxes in areas in which it operates. When recording income tax expense, certain estimates are required by management due to timing and the impact of future events on when income tax expenses and benefits are recognized by the Company. The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset relating primarily to its tax operating loss carryforwards. The Company periodically evaluates its deferred tax asset to determine the likelihood of its realization. A valuation allowance has been recorded for the deferred tax asset to the extent that they are not likely to be realized based on management’s estimation.

 

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Commodity Hedging Activity

 

The Company enters into futures contracts or other hedging agreements from time to time to manage the commodity price risk for a portion of its production. The Company considers these to be hedging activities and, as such, monthly settlements on these contracts are reflected in its oil and natural gas sales. The Company’s strategy, which is administered by the Hedging Committee of the Board of Directors, and reviewed periodically by the entire Board of Directors, has been to hedge between 30% and 70% of its production. A portion of the Company’s hedging arrangements are in the form of costless collars, whereby a floor and a ceiling are fixed. It is the Company’s belief that the benefits of the downside protection afforded by these costless collars outweigh the costs incurred by losing potential upside when commodity prices increase. The remainder of the hedges utilized by the Company are in the form of fixed price swaps, where the Company receives a fixed price and pays a floating price. On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted a formal policy with respect to hedging arrangements in accordance with accounting pronouncements. The Company does not expect its hedging policy or future hedging practice to differ materially from its historical practice. The Company has no plans to engage in speculative activity not supported by production.

 

The Company’s futures contract agreements provide for separate contracts tied to the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) light sweet crude oil and natural gas futures contracts. The contracts contain either specific prices or price ranges known as “collars” that are settled monthly based on the differences between the contract price or price ranges and the average NYMEX prices for each month applied to the related contract

 

20


volumes. To the extent the average NYMEX price exceeds the contract price, the Company pays the difference, and to the extent the contract price exceeds the average NYMEX price, the Company receives the difference.

 

As of December 31, 2002, the Company’s open forward position on its outstanding natural gas and crude oil hedging contracts, all of which were with BNP Paribas, were as follows:

 

Natural Gas

 

3000 MMBtu per day “swap” at $3.50 for January 2003 through February 2003; and

3000 MMBtu per day with a no cost collar of $3.50 and $5.19 per Mmbtu for January through December 2003; and

3000 MMBtu per day “swap” at $4.06 for January 2003 through December 2003.

 

Crude Oil

 

300 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $28.80 for January 2003 through February 2003; and

200 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $29.07 for January 2003 through February 2003; and

100 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $28.95 for January 2003 through February 2003; and

300 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $27.45 for March 2003 through May 2003; and

200 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $29.08 for March 2003 through May 2003

 

The fair value of the natural gas and oil hedging contracts in place at December 31, 2002, resulted, in a liability of $1,108,000.

 

The Company entered into the following crude oil hedging contracts, all of which were with BNP Paribas, subsequent to December 31, 2002.

 

300 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $32.58 for March 2003 through May 2003; and

300 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $28.47 for June 2003 through December 2003; and

200 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $29.32 for June 2003 through December 2003; and

200 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $29.97 for June 2003 through December 2003

 

Price fluctuations and the volatile nature of markets

 

Despite the measures the Company has taken to attempt to control price risk, it remains subject to price fluctuations for oil and natural gas sold in the spot market. Prices received for natural gas sold in the spot market are volatile due primarily to seasonality of demand and other factors beyond the Company’s control. Oil and natural gas prices can change dramatically primarily as a result of the balance between supply and demand. The Company’s average natural gas price received for the year ending December 31, 2002, was $3.08 per Mcf, down from $3.97 per Mcf in 2001 and down from $3.95 per Mcf in 2000. The Company’s average oil price received for the year ended December 31, 2002, was $25.09, up from an average price received of $24.67 in 2001 and down from an average price received of $25.55 in 2000. There can be no assurance that prices will not decline from current levels. Declines in domestic oil and natural gas prices could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and quantities of reserves recoverable on an economic basis. Based on oil and gas pricing in effect at December 31, 2002, a hypothetical 2% increase or decrease in oil and gas pricing would not have had a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

 

Debt and debt-related derivatives

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2002, the Company entered into three separate interest rate swaps with BNP Paribas over a three year period. The first interest rate swap, which has an effective date of February 26, 2003 and a maturity date of February 26, 2004 is for $18,000,000 with a LIBOR swap rate of 1.53%. The second

 

21


interest rate swap, which has an effective date of February 26, 2004 and a maturity date of November 8, 2004, is for $18,000,000 with a LIBOR swap rate of 2.25%. The third interest rate swap, which has an effective date of November 8, 2004 and a maturity date of February 26, 2006, is for $18,000,000 with a LIBOR swap rate of 3.46%.

 

Subsequent to implementing the interest rate swap, interest on the Company’s senior credit facility with BNP Paribas will accrue at a rate calculated at the LIBOR swap rate plus 1.5%—2.5%, depending on borrowing base utilization, with respect to the notional debt amount of $18,000,000.

 

For debt over and above the $18,000,000 hedged under the interest rate swaps, the Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its short-term and long-term debt with variable interest rates. Based on the overall interest rate exposure on variable rate debt at December 31, 2002, a hypothetical 2% increase in the interest rates would increase interest expense by approximately $365,000.

 

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding reserve estimates, planned capital expenditures, future oil and gas production and prices, future drilling activity, the Company’s financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and natural gas that cannot be measured in an exact way, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, estimates made by different engineers often vary from one another. In addition, results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of an estimate may justify revisions of such estimates and such revisions could change the schedule of any further production and development drilling. Accordingly, reserve estimates are generally different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered. Additional important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s expectations include changes in oil and gas prices, changes in regulatory or environmental policies, production difficulties, transportation difficulties and future drilling results. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by such factors.

 

22


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.

 

KPMG LLP

 

Shreveport, Louisiana

March 21, 2003

 

23


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

    

December 31,

2002


    

December 31,

2001


 

ASSETS

             

CURRENT ASSETS

               

Cash and cash equivalents

  

$

3,351,380

 

  

248,701

 

Accounts receivable

               

Trade and other, net of allowance

  

 

3,111,240

 

  

825,593

 

Accrued oil and gas revenue

  

 

3,141,968

 

  

3,456,210

 

Prepaid insurance and other

  

 

884,318

 

  

139,452

 

Fair value of oil and gas derivatives

  

 

 

  

13,000

 

    


  

Total current assets

  

 

10,488,906

 

  

4,682,956

 

    


  

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

               

Oil and gas properties

  

 

105,971,168

 

  

108,019,749

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

  

 

567,908

 

  

321,393

 

    


  

    

 

106,539,076

 

  

108,341,142

 

Less accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization

  

 

(38,978,816

)

  

(33,247,502

)

    


  

Net property and equipment

  

 

67,560,260

 

  

75,093,640

 

    


  

OTHER ASSETS

               

Restricted cash

  

 

2,039,000

 

  

2,039,000

 

Deferred taxes

  

 

450,238

 

  

207,605

 

Other

  

 

227,570

 

  

220,730

 

    


  

Total other assets

  

 

2,716,808

 

  

2,467,335

 

    


  

TOTAL ASSETS

  

$

80,765,974

 

  

82,243,931

 

    


  

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

             

CURRENT LIABILITIES

               

Accounts payable

  

$

6,927,158

 

  

2,398,437

 

Accrued liabilities

  

 

1,564,583

 

  

1,693,674

 

Fair value of oil and gas derivatives

  

 

1,108,428

 

  

 

Current portion of other noncurrent liabilities

  

 

125,000

 

  

124,875

 

    


  

Total current liabilities

  

 

9,725,169

 

  

4,216,986

 

    


  

LONG TERM DEBT

  

 

18,500,000

 

  

24,500,000

 

OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

               

Production payment payable

  

 

978,321

 

  

1,264,729

 

Accrued abandonment costs

  

 

4,756,368

 

  

4,341,669

 

    


  

Total liabilities

  

 

33,959,858

 

  

34,323,384

 

    


  

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

               

Preferred stock; authorized 10,000,000 shares:

               

Series A convertible preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share; issued

and outstanding 791,968 and 791,968 shares (liquidating preference $10 per share, aggregating to $7,919,680)

  

 

791,968

 

  

791,968

 

Common stock, par value $0.20 per share; authorized 50,000,000 shares;

issued and outstanding 17,914,325 and 17,896,356 shares

  

 

3,582,864

 

  

3,579,271

 

Additional paid-in capital

  

 

52,333,738

 

  

52,279,331

 

Accumulated deficit

  

 

(9,223,359

)

  

(8,738,473

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  

 

(679,095

)

  

8,450

 

    


  

Total stockholders’ equity

  

 

46,806,116

 

  

47,920,547

 

    


  

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  

$

80,765,974

 

  

82,243,931

 

    


  

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

24


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


    

2000


 

REVENUES

                      

Oil and gas sales

  

$

18,969,227

 

  

29,541,662

 

  

28,014,245

 

Other

  

 

130,702

 

  

353,117

 

  

475,146

 

    


  

  

Total revenues

  

 

19,099,929

 

  

29,894,779

 

  

28,489,391

 

    


  

  

COSTS AND EXPENSES

                      

Lease operating expense

  

 

7,757,310

 

  

6,576,247

 

  

4,694,714

 

Production taxes

  

 

1,664,065

 

  

1,865,726

 

  

2,219,254

 

Depletion, depreciation and amortization

  

 

5,452,341

 

  

6,844,751

 

  

5,953,641

 

Exploration

  

 

1,128,855

 

  

4,174,436

 

  

2,813,332

 

Impairment of oil and gas properties

  

 

342,079

 

  

1,800,536

 

  

1,834,654

 

General and administrative

  

 

4,467,641

 

  

3,134,865

 

  

2,518,228

 

Interest expense

  

 

985,185

 

  

1,290,681

 

  

4,390,331

 

Other

  

 

 

  

 

  

250,000

 

Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiary

  

 

 

  

 

  

38,364

 

    


  

  

Total costs and expenses

  

 

21,797,476

 

  

25,687,242

 

  

24,712,518

 

    


  

  

GAIN ON SALES OF ASSETS

  

 

2,941,062

 

  

26,779

 

  

307,299

 

    


  

  

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

  

 

243,515

 

  

4,234,316

 

  

4,084,172

 

Income Taxes

  

 

88,648

 

  

1,487,070

 

  

(1,655,032

)

    


  

  

NET INCOME

  

 

154,867

 

  

2,747,246

 

  

5,739,204

 

    


  

  

Preferred stock dividends paid in cash

  

 

639,753

 

  

625,872

 

  

1,193,768

 

Conversion premium on Series B preferred stock

  

 

 

  

2,377,000

 

  

 

    


  

  

INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK

  

$

(484,886

)

  

(255,626

)

  

4,545,436

 

    


  

  

BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE

  

$

(.03

)

  

(.01

)

  

.46

 

    


  

  

DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE

  

$

(.03

)

  

(.01

)

  

.35

 

    


  

  

AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING—BASIC

  

 

17,908,182

 

  

17,351,375

 

  

9,903,248

 

AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING—DILUTED

  

 

17,908,182

 

  

17,351,375

 

  

13,116,641

 

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

25


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


    

2000


 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

                      

Net income

  

$

154,867

 

  

2,747,246

 

  

5,739,204

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

                      

Depletion, depreciation and amortization

  

 

5,452,341

 

  

6,844,751

 

  

5,953,641

 

Amortization of leasehold costs

  

 

351,719

 

  

1,017,426

 

  

1,007,636

 

Amortization of deferred debt financing costs

  

 

132,165

 

  

121,945

 

  

331,042

 

Deferred income taxes

  

 

88,648

 

  

1,487,070

 

  

(1,655,032

)

Impairment of oil and gas properties

  

 

342,079

 

  

1,800,536

 

  

1,834,654

 

Accrued interest and other charges on private placement borrowings

  

 

 

  

 

  

973,631

 

Amortization of debt discount

  

 

 

  

 

  

357,016

 

Amortization of production payment discount

  

 

91,110

 

  

119,728

 

  

230,649

 

Preferred dividends of subsidiary

  

 

 

  

 

  

38,364

 

Gain on sale of asset

  

 

(2,941,062

)

  

(26,779

)

  

(307,299

)

Director stock grant

  

 

30,000

 

  

30,000

 

  

30,000

 

Dry hole costs

  

 

 

  

1,604,226

 

  

475,130

 

Other

  

 

58,408

 

  

 

  

250,000

 

Net change in:

                      

Accounts receivable

  

 

(1,971,405

)

  

513,719

 

  

(2,188,070

)

Prepaid insurance and other

  

 

(839,678

)

  

93,945

 

  

(181,323

)

Accounts payable

  

 

4,528,721

 

  

(645,041

)

  

331,728

 

Accrued liabilities

  

 

(129,091

)

  

81,709

 

  

(95,030

)

Other liabilities

  

 

 

  

 

  

(484,525

)

    


  

  

Net cash provided by operating activities

  

 

5,348,822

 

  

15,790,481

 

  

12,641,416

 

    


  

  

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

                      

Proceeds from sales of assets

  

 

12,822,591

 

  

406,779

 

  

459,526

 

Acquisition of oil and gas properties

  

 

 

  

 

  

(1,198,631

)

Capital expenditures

  

 

(8,079,463

)

  

(32,252,774

)

  

(15,141,818

)

    


  

  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

  

 

4,743,128

 

  

(31,845,995

)

  

(15,880,923

)

    


  

  

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

                      

Proceeds from private placement of common stock

  

 

 

  

15,000,000

 

  

9,150,000

 

Principal payments of bank borrowings

  

 

(13,500,000

)

  

(13,690,000

)

  

(4,125,617

)

Proceeds from bank borrowings

  

 

7,500,000

 

  

15,225,000

 

  

 

Preferred stock dividends

  

 

(639,753

)

  

(626,331

)

  

(2,308,011

)

Exercise of stock purchase warrants

  

 

 

  

180,233

 

  

249,322

 

Exercise of stock options

  

 

28,000

 

  

11,563

 

  

201,319

 

Net change in restricted cash

  

 

 

  

(799,000

)

  

(1,240,000

)

Payment of debt and equity financing costs

  

 

 

  

(1,983,691

)

  

(431,557

)

Production payments

  

 

(377,518

)

  

(545,322

)

  

(653,415

)

    


  

  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  

 

(6,989,271

)

  

12,772,452

 

  

842,041

 

    


  

  

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  

 

3,102,679

 

  

(3,283,062

)

  

(2,397,466

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

  

 

248,701

 

  

3,531,763

 

  

5,929,229

 

    


  

  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

  

$

3,351,380

 

  

248,701

 

  

3,531,763

 

    


  

  

NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

                      

Conversion of net carrying amount of notes payable and accrued interest

  

 

 

  

 

  

10,130,349

 

Conversion of preferred stock of subsidiary

  

 

 

  

 

  

2,721,489

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

26


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

 

   

Series A

Preferred Stock


   

Series B

Preferred Stock


   

Common Stock


 

Additional

Paid-In

Capital


 

Accumulated

Deficit


      

Accumulated

Other Comprehensive

Income-


   

Total

Stockholders’

Equity


 

Balance at January 1, 2000

 

796,318

 

  

$

796,318

 

 

665,759

 

  

$

665,759

 

 

5,417,171

  

$

1,083,434

 

$

18,156,114

 

$

(14,290,581

)

    

$

 

 

$

6,411,044

 

   

  


 

  


 
  

 

 


    


 


Net Income

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

5,739,204

 

    

 

 

 

 

5,739,204

 

   

  


 

  


 
  

 

 


    


 


Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

5,739,204

 

Issuance of Common Stock

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

2,533,333

  

 

506,667

 

 

8,643,333

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

9,150,000

 

Conversion of preferred stock of subsidiary to common stock

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

1,547,665

  

 

309,533

 

 

2,411,956

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

2,721,489

 

Exercise of director stock option

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

12,500

  

 

2,500

 

 

7,375

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

9,875

 

Conversion of notes payable

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

3,295,647

  

 

659,130

 

 

9,751,719

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

10,410,849

 

Preferred stock dividends

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

(2,308,011

)

    

 

 

 

 

(2,308,011

)

Exercise of common stock purchase warrants

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

252,022

  

 

50,403

 

 

198,919

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

249,322

 

Exercise of Employee Stock Options

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

245,698

  

 

49,140

 

 

142,304

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

191,444

 

Director Stock Grant

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

6,000

  

 

1,200

 

 

28,800

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

30,000

 

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to Common Stock

 

 

  

 

 

 

(4,920

)

  

 

(4,920

)

 

5,486

  

 

1,097

 

 

3,823

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock to Common Stock

 

(4,350

)

  

 

(4,350

)

 

 

  

 

 

 

3,398

  

 

680

 

 

3,670

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

   

  


 

  


 
  

 

 


    


 


Balance at December 31, 2000

 

791,968

 

  

$

791,968

 

 

660,839

 

  

$

660,839

 

 

13,318,920

  

$

2,663,784

 

$

39,348,013

 

$

(10,859,388

)

    

$

 

 

$

32,605,216

 

   

  


 

  


 
  

 

 


    


 


Net Income

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

2,747,246

 

    

 

 

 

 

2,747,246

 

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, net of tax

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

(2,535,469

)

 

 

(2,535,469

)

Net Derivative Gain, net of tax

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

1,797,336

 

 

 

1,797,336

 

Reclassification Adjustment, net of tax

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

746,583

 

 

 

746,583

 

                                                                     


Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

2,755,696

 

Issuance of Common Stock

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

3,000,000

  

 

600,000

 

 

12,469,170

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

13,069,170

 

Preferred stock dividends

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

(626,331

)

    

 

 

 

 

(626,331

)

Exercise of common stock purchase warrants

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

375,296

  

 

75,059

 

 

105,174

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

180,233

 

Exercise of Employee Stock Options

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

7,500

  

 

1,500

 

 

10,063

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

11,563

 

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to Common Stock

 

 

  

 

 

 

(660,839

)

  

 

(660,839

)

 

1,189,510

  

 

237,902

 

 

317,937

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(105,000

)

Director Stock Grant

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

5,130

  

 

1,026

 

 

28,974

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

30,000

 

   

  


 

  


 
  

 

 


    


 


Balance at December 31, 2001

 

791,968

 

  

$

791,968

 

 

 

  

$

 

 

17,896,356

  

$

3,579,271

 

$

52,279,331

 

$

(8,738,473

)

    

$

8,450

 

 

$

47,920,547

 

   

  


 

  


 
  

 

 


    


 


Net Income

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

154,867

 

    

 

 

 

 

154,867

 

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, net of tax

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Net Derivative Gain, net of tax

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

(1,345,763

)

 

 

(1,345,763

)

Reclassification Adjustment, net of tax

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

658,218

 

 

 

658,218

 

                                                                     


Total Comprehensive Income

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(532,678

)

Preferred stock dividends

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

(639,753

)

    

 

 

 

 

(639,753

)

Exercise of common stock purchase warrants

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise of Employee Stock Options

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

10,667

  

 

2,133

 

 

25,867

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

28,000

 

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to Common Stock

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Director Stock Grant

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

7,302

  

 

1,460

 

 

28,540

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

30,000

 

   

  


 

  


 
  

 

 


    


 


Balance at December 31, 2002

 

791,968

 

  

$

791,968

 

 

 

  

$

 

 

17,914,325

  

$

3,582,864

 

$

52,333,738

 

$

(9,223,359

)

    

$

(679,095

)

 

$

46,806,116

 

   

  


 

  


 
  

 

 


    


 


 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

27


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

December 31, 2002

 

NOTE A—Description of Business

 

The Company is in the primary business of exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. The Company’s subsidiaries have interests in such operations in four states, primarily in Louisiana and Texas.

 

NOTE B—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Principles of Consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Revenue Recognition—Revenues from the production of crude oil and natural gas properties in which the Company has an interest with other producers are recognized on the entitlements method. The Company records an asset or liability for natural gas balancing when the Company has purchased or sold more than its working interest share of natural gas production, respectively. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the assets and liabilities for gas balancing were immaterial. Differences between actual production and net working interest volumes are routinely adjusted. These differences are not significant.

 

Property and Equipment—The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for exploration and development expenditures. Leasehold acquisition costs are capitalized. When proved reserves are found on an undeveloped property, leasehold cost is reclassified to proved properties. Significant undeveloped leases are reviewed periodically, and a valuation allowance is provided for any estimated decline in value. Cost of all other undeveloped leases is amortized over the estimated average holding period of the leases.

 

Costs of exploratory drilling are initially capitalized, but if proved reserves are not found, the costs are subsequently expensed. All other exploratory costs are charged to expense as incurred. Development costs are capitalized, including the cost of unsuccessful development wells.

 

The Company recognizes an impairment when the net of future cash inflows expected to be generated by an identifiable long-lived asset and cash outflows expected to be required to obtain those cash inflows is less than the carrying value of the asset. The Company performs this comparison for its oil and gas properties on a field-by-field basis using the Company’s estimates of future commodity prices. The amount of such loss is measured based on the difference between the discounted value of such net future cash flows and the carrying value of the asset. The Company recorded such impairments in 2002, 2001 and 2000 in the amounts of $342,000, $1,801,000 and $1,835,000 respectively. The impairments were generally the result of certain non-core fields depleting earlier than anticipated.

 

Depreciation and depletion of producing oil and gas properties are provided under the unit-of-production method. Proved developed reserves are used to compute unit rates for unamortized tangible and intangible development costs, and proved reserves are used for unamortized leasehold costs. Estimated dismantlement, abandonment, and site restoration costs, net of salvage value, are considered in determining depreciation and depletion provisions.

 

Gains and losses on disposals or retirements that are significant or include an entire depreciable or depletable property unit are included in income. All other dispositions, retirements, or abandonments are reflected in accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization.

 

28


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposit accounts and temporary cash investments with maturities of ninety days or less at date of purchase.

 

Income Taxes—The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires income taxes be accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

Earnings Per Share—Basic income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common stockholders, for each reporting period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per common share is computed by dividing net income available for common stockholders for each reporting period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the effects of potentially dilutive common shares.

 

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—The Company utilizes derivative instruments such as futures, forwards, options, collars and swaps for purposes of hedging its exposure to fluctuations in the price of crude oil and natural gas and to hedge its exposure to changing interest rates.

 

Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS 138. See also Note K for further information about the Company’s derivative instruments. In accordance with the transition provisions of SFAS 133, the Company recorded a cumulative adjustment of $2,535,000 (net of $1,365,000 in income taxes) in accumulated other comprehensive income to recognize at fair value all derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedging instruments. There was no cumulative effect on earnings. The fair value of a derivative instrument is recognized as an asset or liability in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Upon entering into a derivative contract, the Company may designate the derivative as either a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge, or decide that the contract is not a hedge, and thenceforth, mark the contract to market through earnings. The Company documents the relationship between the derivative instrument designated as a hedge and the hedged items, as well as its objective for risk management and strategy for use of the hedging instrument to manage the risk. Derivative instruments designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are linked to specific assets and liabilities or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company assesses at inception, and on an ongoing basis, whether a derivative instrument used as a hedge is highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. A derivative that is not a highly effective hedge does not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of a qualifying fair value hedge are recorded in earnings along with the gain or loss on the hedged item. Changes in the fair value of a qualifying cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the cash flows of the hedged item. When the cash flow of the hedged item is recognized in the Statement of Income, the fair value of the associated cash flow hedge is reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings.

 

Ineffective portions of a cash flow hedging derivative’s change in fair value are recognized currently in earnings. If a derivative instrument no longer qualifies as a cash flow hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued and the gain or loss that was recorded in other comprehensive income is recognized immediately in earnings.

 

29


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2000, prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 133, gains and losses from derivatives designated as hedges of sales were reported on the Statement of Income as an increase or reduction of oil and gas sales in the period related to the actual sale of product. Premiums paid on hedging contracts were amortized over the life of the contracts as a reduction to oil and gas sales.

 

Stock Based Compensation—The Company uses SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which permits entities to recognize as expense, over the vesting period, the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant. Alternatively, SFAS No. 123 also allows entities to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share and other disclosures for employee stock option grants made in 1995 and future years as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied. The Company has elected to continue to apply the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 and provide the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123. For stock based compensation that vests on a prorata basis where the award is fixed at the grant date, the Company has elected to amortize those costs using straight line method over the life of the award.

 

The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for its plans and, accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options in the financial statements. Had the Company determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income (loss) would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

 

    
  

2002


    

2001


    

2000


Net Income (loss)

  

As reported

  

$

154,867

 

  

$

2,747,246

 

  

5,739,204

    

Pro forma

  

 

(792,230

)

  

 

2,063,595

 

  

5,040,410

Income (loss) applicable to

  

As reported

  

 

(484,886

)

  

 

(255,626

)

  

4,545,436

    common stock

  

Pro forma

  

 

(1,431,983

)

  

 

(939,277

)

  

3,846,642

Basic income (loss)

                           

    per average common share

  

As reported

  

 

(0.03

)

  

 

(0.01

)

  

0.46

    

Pro forma

  

 

(0.08

)

  

 

(0.05

)

  

0.39

Diluted income (loss)

                           

    per average common share

  

As reported

  

 

(0.03

)

  

 

(0.01

)

  

0.35

    

Pro forma

  

 

(0.08

)

  

 

(0.05

)

  

0.29

 

Commitments and Contingencies—Liabilities for loss contingencies, including environmental remediation costs, arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties, and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment and/or remediation can be reasonably estimated. Recoveries from third parties, which are probable of realization, are separately recorded, and are not offset against the related environmental liability.

 

Use of Estimates—Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Accounting Matters— The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”) immediately upon release and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”) on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and that certain acquired intangible

 

30


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

assets in a business combination be recognized and reported as assets apart from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 requires that amortization of goodwill be replaced with periodic tests of the goodwill’s impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142 and that intangible assets other than goodwill be amortized over their useful lives. The Company does not have any identified intangible assets nor any goodwill as of December 31, 2002 or December 31, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 and 142 had no significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires the Company to record a liability equal to the fair value of the estimated cost to retire an asset. The asset retirement liability must be recorded in the periods in which the obligation meets the definition of a liability, which is generally when the asset is placed in service. When the liability is initially recorded, the Company will increase the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset by an amount equal to the original liability. The liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related long-lived asset. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003, the Company will recognize transition adjustments for existing asset retirement obligations, long-lived assets and accumulated depreciation, all net of related income tax effects, as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. After adoption, any difference between costs incurred upon settlement of an asset retirement obligation and the recorded liability will be recognized as a gain or loss in the Company’s earnings. The Company is currently unable to determine the effect of adopting FAS No. 143 on its financial statements.

 

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which supercedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual, and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. The Company adopted the provision of SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 had no impact on the Company.

 

The Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 02-3 in the fourth quarter 2002. This consensus requires that the results of energy trading activities be recorded on a net margin basis. The adoption had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirement for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. This Interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. The Interpretation also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of the Interpretation are applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statement of interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002.

 

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both

 

31


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

annual and interim financial statements. Certain of the disclosure modifications are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and are included in the notes to these consolidated financial statements.

 

NOTE C—Sale of Oil and Gas Properties to Related Party

 

On March 12, 2002, the Company, in an effort to monetize a portion of the value created in its Burrwood and West Delta fields and enhance its liquidity position, completed the sale of a thirty percent (30%) working interest in the existing production and shallow rights, and a fifteen percent (15%) working interest in the deep rights below 10,600 feet, in its Burrwood and West Delta fields for $12 million to Malloy Energy Company, LLC led by Patrick E. Malloy, III and participated in by Sheldon Appel, both members of the Company’s Board of Directors (Mr. Malloy is now Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors), as well as Josiah Austin, who subsequently became a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The sale price was determined by discounting the present value of the acquired interest in the fields’ proved, probable and possible reserves using prevailing oil and gas prices. The Company retained an approximate sixty-five percent (65%) working interest in the existing production and shallow rights, and a thirty-two and one-half percent (32.5%) working interest in the deep rights after the close of the transaction. In conjunction with the sale, the investor group provided a $7.7 million line of credit. The $7.7 million line of credit, which reduced to $5.0 million on January 1, 2003, is subordinate to the Company’s senior credit facility and can be used for acquisitions, drilling, development and general corporate purposes until December 31, 2004. The investor group retains the option, during the two-year period, to convert the amount outstanding under the credit line, and/or provide cash on any unused credit to a maximum of $7.7 million through December 31, 2002, reduced to $5.0 million after December 31, 2002, into working interests in any acquisition(s) the Company may make in Louisiana prior to January 1, 2005. The conversion of the credit facility will be on a pro-rata basis with the Company’s interest and may not exceed a maximum of $7.7 million reduced to $5.0 million after December 31, 2002 or thirty percent (30%) of any potential acquisition(s). To date, no borrowings have been made under the credit facility.

 

The Company recorded a non-recurring gain of approximately $2.4 million in the first quarter of 2002 as a result of the sale. The proceeds were used to reduce outstanding debt under its senior credit facility.

 

NOTE D—Public Offering

 

On February 1, 2001, the Company completed a public offering of 3,000,000 shares of its common stock at $5.00 per share resulting in net proceeds of approximately $13.2 million to the Company. The Company used the proceeds from the offering along with other available funds to reduce outstanding debt under its senior credit facility by approximately $13.7 million.

 

NOTE E—Exchange of Series B Preferred Stock

 

Prior to the public offering, the Company reached an agreement with all of the holders of its Series B preferred stock to exchange each share of Series B preferred stock for 1.8 shares of its common stock. Concurrent with the closing of the public offering, the Company exchanged all 660,839 shares of its Series B preferred stock into 1,189,510 shares of common stock. In connection with the conversion of the Series B preferred stock, a conversion premium in the amount of $2,377,000 was recorded to reflect the excess of the 1.8:1.0 conversion factor over the terms of the original preferred stock issuance. This one-time, non-cash charge was reflected as a preferred stock dividend to arrive at net income applicable to common stock and did not have an affect on total stockholders’ equity.

 

32


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

NOTE F—Indebtedness

 

Indebtedness at December 31, 2002 and 2001 consists of the following:

 

    

2002


  

2001


Bank Debt

           

Borrowings under credit facility, interest, at BNP Paribas prime plus 0.5% or Libor plus 2.5% (weighted average rate at December 31, 2002—5.7%); principal due November 8, 2004

  

$

18,500,000

  

24,500,000

Less current portion

  

 

  

    

  

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

  

$

18,500,000

  

24,500,000

    

  

 

On November 9, 2001 the Company established a $50,000,000 credit facility with BNP Paribas, with an initial borrowing base of $25,000,000. The current borrowing base of $23,000,000 will remain effective until the next borrowing base redetermination, which is scheduled to be made on or before March 31, 2003. Interest on borrowings will accrue at a rate calculated, at the option of the Company, as either the BNP Paribas base rate plus 0.00% to 0.50%, or LIBOR plus 1.50%—2.50%, depending on borrowing base utilization. Interest on LIBOR-rate borrowings is due and payable on the last day of its respective interest period. Accrued interest on each base-rate borrowing is due and payable on the last day of each quarter. The credit facility will mature on November 8, 2004. The credit facility requires that the Company pay a 0.375% per annum commitment fee, payable in quarterly installments based on the Company’s borrowing base utilization. Prior to maturity, no payments are required so long as the maximum borrowing base amount exceeds the amounts outstanding under the credit facility. The credit facility requires the Company to monitor tangible net worth and maintain certain financial statement ratios at certain levels. Substantially all the Company’s assets are pledged to secure the credit facility.

 

Interest paid during 2002, 2001 and 2000 amounted to $639,147, $849,725 and $2,182,724, respectively.

 

NOTE G—Income (Loss) Per Share

 

Net income (loss) was used as the numerator in computing both basic and diluted income (loss) per common share for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. The following table reconciles the weighted average shares outstanding used for these computations.

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


    

2002


  

2001


  

2000


Basic Method

  

17,908,182

  

17,351,375

  

9,903,248

Dilutive Stock Warrants

  

  

  

2,842,858

Dilutive Stock Options.

  

  

  

370,535

    
  
  

Diluted Method

  

17,908,182

  

17,351,375

  

13,116,641

    
  
  

 

The Company’s Series A convertible preferred stock and its stock options are considered to be potential common stock. Additionally, stock purchase warrants issued in the 1999 Private Placement are also considered potential common stock. Approximately 798,000 stock options and 1,067,000 shares issuable in connection with the convertible preferred stock have not been included in the computation of diluted income per share in 2000, because to do so would have been antidilutive. No potential common stock amounts have been included in the

 

33


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

computation of diluted per share in 2002 and 2001 because to do so would have been antidilutive. The calculation of the dilutive effects of potentially dilutive securities has been calculated under the treasury stock method.

 

NOTE H—Income Taxes

 

Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ending December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 consists of:

 

    

Current


  

Deferred


    

Total


 

Year Ended December 31, 2002:

                    

U.S. Federal

  

$

  

88,648

 

  

88,648

 

State

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

  

  

    

 

  

88,648

 

  

88,648

 

    

  

  

Year Ended December 31, 2001:

                    

U.S. Federal

  

$

  

1,487,070

 

  

1,487,070

 

State

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

  

  

    

 

  

1,487,070

 

  

1,487,070

 

    

  

  

Year Ended December 31, 2000:

                    

U.S. Federal

  

$

  

(1,655,032

)

  

(1,655,032

)

State

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

  

  

    

 

    —

  

(1,655,032

)

  

(1,655,032

)

    

  

  

 

The following is a reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income to the Company’s income (loss) before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000:

 

    

2002


  

2001


  

2000


 

U.S. statutory income tax

  

$

83,590

  

1,482,011

  

1,429,460

 

Increase in deductible temporary differences for which no benefit recorded

  

 

  

  

 

Change in the beginning of the year balance of the valuation allowance allocated to income tax expense

  

 

  

  

(3,089,767

)

Nondeductible expenses

  

 

5,058

  

5,059

  

5,275

 

    

  
  

    

$

88,648

  

1,487,070

  

(1,655,032

)

    

  
  

 

34


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2002 and 2001 are presented below.

 

    

2002


    

2001


 

Deferred tax assets:

               

Differences between book and tax basis of:

               

Operating loss carryforwards

  

$

14,234,869

 

  

12,878,565

 

Statutory depletion carryforward

  

 

7,034,566

 

  

6,695,115

 

AMT Tax credit carryforward

  

 

1,399,890

 

  

1,399,890

 

Asset related to hedging activities

  

 

387,950

 

  

 

Contingent liabilities

  

 

132,348

 

  

107,848

 

Other

  

 

258,264

 

  

229,798

 

    


  

Total gross deferred tax assets

  

 

23,447,887

 

  

21,311,216

 

Less valuation allowance

  

 

(17,641,358

)

  

(17,000,473

)

    


  

Net deferred tax assets

  

 

5,806,529

 

  

4,310,743

 

    


  

Deferred tax liability:

               

Differences between book and tax basis of:

               

Property and equipment

  

 

(5,356,291

)

  

(4,103,138

)

    


  

Total gross deferred liability

  

 

(5,356,291

)

  

(4,103,138

)

    


  

Net deferred tax asset

  

$

450,238

 

  

207,605

 

    


  

 

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased $640,885 and increased $184,274 for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in both years is primarily the result of changes in deferred tax assets. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based primarily upon the level of projections for future taxable income and the reversal of future taxable temporary differences over the periods which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance at December 31, 2002. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

 

35


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

The following table summarizes the amounts and expiration dates of operating loss and investment tax credit carryforwards:

 

Operating loss carryforwards


Expires


     

Amounts


2006

     

$  3,780,636

2007

     

    8,860,622

2008

     

    4,285,746

2009

     

    3,247,494

2010

     

    6,450,859

2011

     

       600,706

2012

     

    1,939,496

2018

     

    4,530,029

2019

     

    2,546,445

2020

     

       372,409

2021

     

           1,750

2022

     

    4,054,863

       
       

$40,671,055

       

 

An ownership change in accordance with Internal Revenue Code (IRC) (S)382, occurred in August 1995 and again in August 2000. The net operating losses (NOLs) generated prior to August 1995 are subject to an annual IRC (S)382 limitation of $1,682,797. The IRC (S)382 annual limitation for the ownership change in August 2000 is $3,647,700. The latter IRC (S)382 ownership change limitation is a cumulative limitation and does not eliminate or increase the limitation on the pre-August 1995 NOLs. The NOLs generated after August 1995 and prior to August 2000, are subject to an annual limitation of $3,647,700 less the annual amount utilized for pre-August 1995 NOLs. It should be noted that the same IRC (S)382 limitations apply to the alternative minimum tax net operating loss carryforwards depletion carryforwards, and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards. The minimum tax credit carryforward (MTC) of $1,399,890 as of December 31, 2002, will not begin to be utilized until after the available NOLs have been utilized or expired and when regular tax exceeds the current year alternative minimum tax. Additionally, the statutory (percentage) depletion carryforward of $20,098,759 is considered a special deduction under FASB Statement 109. In accordance with Statement 109, the tax benefits of special deductions are generally recognized in the year they become deductible on the tax return. The unused annual IRC (S)382 limitations can be carried over to subsequent years.

 

NOTE I—Production Payment Obligation

 

A production payment was entered into by the Company to assist in the financing of the Lafitte field acquisition in September 1999. The original amount of the production payment obligation was $2,940,000, which was recorded as a production payment liability of $2,228,000 after a discount to reflect an effective rate of interest of 11.25%. At December 31, 2002 the remaining principal amount was $1,281,000 and the recorded liability was $978,000. Under the terms of the production payment the Company must make monthly cash payments which approximate the Company’s forty-nine percent share of 10% of the monthly gross oil and gas revenue of the Lafitte field.

 

The Company’s estimate as of December 31, 2002, based on expected production and prices and expected discount amortization is that projected payments will decrease the liability as follows: 2003, $521,000 and 2004, $760,000.

 

36


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

NOTE J—Stockholders’ Equity

 

On February 1, 2001, the Company completed a public offering of 3,000,000 shares of its common stock at $5.00 per share resulting in net proceeds of approximately $13.2 million to the Company. The Company used the proceeds from the offering along with other available funds to reduce outstanding debt under its senior credit facility by approximately $13.7 million.

 

On October 23, 2000, the Company completed a private placement of 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $5.00 per share. Net proceeds from the private placement amounted to $4,650,000 and were used primarily to accelerate the development of the Company’s Burrwood and West Delta fields. An affiliate of a member of the Company’s board of directors received $250,000 in compensation for its service in placing the shares in the private placement.

 

On February 18, 2000, the Company completed a private placement of shares of its common stock resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $4,500,000. The Company issued 1,533,000 shares of common stock in its offering. The $4,500,000 in offering proceeds was used to assist in the acquisition and development of the Burrwood and West Delta fields, and to further develop the Lafitte field purchased in 1999.

 

Common Stock—At December 31, 2002 unissued shares of Goodrich common stock were reserved in the amount of 4,534,000 shares for the exercise of stock warrants issued in connection with the private placement transaction of September 23, 1999 and 330,013 shares for Series A convertible preferred stock.

 

Preferred Stock—The Series A convertible preferred stock has a par value of $1.00 per share with a liquidation preference of $10.00 per share, and is convertible at the option of the holder at any time, unless earlier redeemed, into shares of common stock of the Company at an initial conversion rate of .417 shares of common stock per share of Series A preferred. The Series A preferred stock also will automatically convert to common stock if the closing price for the Series A preferred stock exceeds $15.00 per share for ten consecutive trading days. The Series A preferred stock is redeemable in whole or in part, at $12.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends on the Series A preferred stock accrue at an annual rate of 8% and are cumulative.

 

The Company issued 750,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock in connection with its acquisition of the La/Cal II properties on January 31, 1997. The Series B convertible preferred stock had a par value of $1.00 per share with a liquidation preference of $10.00 per share and ranked junior to the Series A preferred stock. The shares of Series B preferred stock were convertible at the option of the holder at any time, unless earlier redeemed, into shares of common stock of the Company at the conversion rate of 1.12 shares of common stock per share of Series B preferred stock. The Series B preferred stock was redeemable by the Company prior to January 31, 2001 at $10.00 per share. Dividends on the Series B preferred stock accrued at an annual rate of 8.25% and were cumulative.

 

The Company reached an agreement with all of the holders of its Series B preferred stock in 2001 to exchange each share of Series B for 1.8 shares of its common stock. Concurrent with the closing of its public offering (See Note E), the Company exchanged all 660,839 shares of its Series B preferred stock into 1,189,510 shares of common stock.

 

Stock Option and Incentive Programs—Goodrich currently has two plans, which provide for stock option and other incentive awards for the Company’s key employees, consultants and directors. The Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan allows the Board of Directors to grant stock options, restricted

 

37


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

stock awards, stock appreciation rights, long-term incentive awards and phantom stock awards, or any combination thereof, to key employees and consultants. The Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1997 Director Compensation Plan provides for the grant of stock and options to each director who is not and has never been an employee of the Company. Additionally, the Company assumed certain outstanding stock options of Patrick as a result of the business combination in 1995.

 

The Goodrich plans authorize grants of options to purchase up to a combined total of 1,587,168 shares of authorized but unissued common stock. Stock options are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the stock’s fair market value at the date of grant, and all stock options granted under the 1995 Stock Option Plan generally have ten year terms and three year pro rata vesting.

 

In February 2003, the Company cancelled 1,016,500 outstanding options by issuing 125,157 shares of its common stock to the holders of such options. At the same time, the Company issued 150,000 restricted shares of its common stock, with a three year vesting period, to its employees under the Company’s existing incentive stock option and restricted stock awards plan. As a result of these transactions, the Company’s total shares and options outstanding will be reduced by 741,343 shares. Additionally, the Company will be required to record a charge of approximately $403,000 in the first quarter of 2003 related to the issuance of shares in lieu of rescinded options and to record periodic charges of approximately $40,000 per quarter beginning in the first quarter of 2003 and continuing through the first quarter of 2006 related to the vesting of the restricted stock.

 

The per share weighted average fair value of stock options granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $2.43, $2.63 and $3.16 on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

2002—expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate of 6%, and an expected life of 5 years; 2001—expected dividend yield 0%, risk-free interest rate of 6.0%, and an expected life of 6 years;

 

38


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

Stock option transactions during 2002, 2001 and 2000 were as follows:

 

    

Number of Options


    

Weighted Average Exercise Price


  

Range of Exercise Price


  

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life


       

Total


  

Total


  

Total


Outstanding January 1, 2000

  

472,884

 

         

$0.75 to $24.00

  

8.5 yrs.

    

                

    Granted—1995 Stock Option Plan

  

600,000

 

  

$

4.99

         

    Granted—1997 Director Compensation Plan

  

12,000

 

  

 

4.88

         

    Exercised—1995 Stock Option Plan

  

(245,696

)

  

 

.78

         

    Exercised—1997 Director Stock Option Plan

  

(12,500

)

  

 

.79

         

    Expiration of Options

  

(63,750

)

  

 

4.35

         
    

                

Outstanding December 31, 2000

  

762,938

 

         

$0.75 to $24.00

  

8.9 yrs.

    

                

    Granted—1995 Stock Option Plan

  

710,000

 

  

 

5.79

         

    Granted—1997 Director Compensation Plan

  

24,000

 

  

 

5.85

         

    Exercised—1995 Stock Option Plan

  

(7,500

)

  

 

1.54

         

    Expiration of Options

  

(24,376

)

  

 

7.67

         
    

                

Outstanding December 31, 2001

  

1,465,062

 

         

$0.75 to $18.00

  

8.7 yrs.

    

                

    Granted—1995 Stock Option Plan

  

63,000

 

  

 

3.72

         

    Granted—1997 Director Compensation Plan

  

24,000

 

  

 

4.11

         

    Exercised—1995 Stock Option Plan

  

(10,677

)

  

 

2.63

         

    Expiration of options

  

(5,333

)

  

 

2.63

         
    

                

Outstanding Dec. 31, 2002

  

1,536,062

 

         

$0.75 to $18.00

  

7.8 yrs

    

                

Exercisable December 31, 2000

  

129,356

 

  

 

7.59

         

Exercisable December 31, 2001

  

349,063

 

  

 

5.21

         

Exercisable December 31, 2002

  

764,917

 

  

 

5.32

         

 

NOTE K—Hedging Activities

 

The Company enters into futures contracts or other hedging agreements from time to time to manage the commodity price risk for a portion of its production. The Company considers these to be hedging activities and, as such, monthly settlements on these contracts are reflected in its oil and natural gas sales. The Company’s strategy, which is administered by the hedging committee of the Board of Directors and reviewed periodically by the entire Board of Directors, has been to hedge between 30% and 70% of its production. A portion of the Company’s hedging arrangements are in the form of costless collars, whereby a floor and a ceiling are fixed. It is the Company’s belief that the benefits of the downside protection afforded by these costless collars outweigh the costs incurred by losing potential upside when commodity prices increase. The remainder of the hedges utilized by the Company are in the form of fixed price swaps, where the Company receives a fixed price and pays a floating price. On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted a formal policy with respect to hedging arrangements in accordance with accounting pronouncements. The Company does not expect its hedging policy or future hedging practice to differ materially from its historical practice. The Company has no plans to engage in speculative activity not supported by production.

 

The Company’s futures contract agreements provide for separate contracts tied to the New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) light sweet crude oil and natural gas futures contracts. The contracts contain either specific prices or price ranges known as “collars” that are settled monthly based on the differences between the contract price or price ranges and the average NYMEX prices for each month applied to the related contract

 

39


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

volumes. To the extent the average NYMEX price exceeds the contract price, the Company pays the difference, and to the extent the contract price exceeds the average NYMEX price, the Company receives the difference.

 

As of December 31, 2002, the Company’s open forward position on its outstanding natural gas and crude oil hedging contracts, all of which were with BNP Paribas, were as follows:

 

Natural Gas

 

3000 MMBtu per day “swap” at $3.50 for January 2003 through February 2003; and

3000 MMBtu per day with a no cost collar of $3.50 and $5.19 per Mmbtu for January through December 2003; and

3000 MMBtu per day “swap” at $4.06 for January 2003 through December 2003.

 

Crude Oil

 

300 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $28.80 for January 2003 through February 2003; and

200 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $29.07 for January 2003 through February 2003; and

100 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $28.95 for January 2003 through February 2003; and

300 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $27.45 for March 2003 through May 2003; and

200 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $29.08 for March 2003 through May 2003

 

The fair value of the natural gas and oil hedging contracts in place at December 31, 2002, resulted, in a liability of $1,108,000.

 

As of December 31, 2002, $679,095 (net of $365,667 in income taxes) of deferred losses on derivative instruments accumulated in other comprehensive income are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months. During 2002, $1,345,763 in net unrealized loss (net of $724,642 in income taxes) were recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income and $658,218 in net unrealized losses (net of $354,425 in income taxes) was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to oil and gas sales as the cash flow of the hedged items was recognized. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company’s earnings were reduced by $63,667 from cash flow hedging ineffectiveness arising from the natural gas hedging contracts.

 

The Company has the option to terminate its outstanding oil and natural gas hedging contracts by paying the amount of the liability. The Company does not anticipate terminating any of its open contracts. The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its hedging contracts. The Company anticipates, however, that counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their obligations under the contracts. The Company does not obtain collateral to support financial instruments but monitors the credit standing of the counterparties.

 

Price fluctuations and volatile nature of markets

 

Despite the measures taken by the Company to attempt to control price risk, the Company remains subject to price fluctuations for natural gas and oil sold in the spot market. Prices received for natural gas sold on the spot market are volatile due primarily to seasonality of demand and other factors beyond the Company’s control. Domestic prices for oil and gas could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and quantities of reserves recoverable on an economic basis.

 

40


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

The Company entered into the following crude oil hedging contracts, all of which were with BNP Paribas, subsequent to December 31, 2002.

 

300 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $32.58 for March 2003 through May 2003; and

300 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $28.47 for June 2003 through December 2003; and

200 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $29.32 for June 2003 through December 2003; and

200 barrels of oil per day “swap” at $29.97 for June 2003 through December 2003

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2002, the Company also entered into interest rate swaps to hedge against potential increases in interest rates. The Company has entered into three separate interest rate swaps with BNP Paribas over a three year period. The first interest rate swap, which has an effective date of February 26, 2003 and a maturity date of February 26, 2004 is for $18,000,000 with a LIBOR swap rate of 1.53%. The second interest rate swap, which has an effective date of February 26, 2004 and a maturity date of November 8, 2004, is for $18,000,000 with a LIBOR swap rate of 2.25%. The third interest rate swap, which has an effective date of November 8, 2004 and a maturity date of February 26, 2006, is for $18,000,000 with a LIBOR swap rate of 3.46%.

 

NOTE L—Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The following presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2002 and 2001.

 

    

2002


    

2001


    

Carrying

Amount


    

Fair Value


    

Carrying

Amount


  

Fair Value


Financial liabilities—

                         

Long-term debt (including current maturities)

  

$

18,500,000

 

  

18,500,000

 

  

24,500,000

  

24,500,000

Production payment liability

  

$

978,321

 

  

978,321

 

  

1,264,729

  

1,264,729

Oil and gas derivative assets (liabilities)

                         

Oil

  

$

(185,759

)

  

(185,759

)

  

  

Gas

  

$

(922,669

)

  

(922,669

)

  

13,000

  

13,000

 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

 

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payables and accrued liabilities:    The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. Therefore, these instruments were not presented in the table above.

 

Long term debt and other noncurrent liabilities:    The fair value is estimated using the discounted cash flow method based on the Company’s borrowing rates or similar types of financing arrangements.

 

Oil and gas derivatives:    The fair value is calculated based on the discounted cash flow expected to be received or paid on the derivative utilizing future posted market prices of the underlying product.

 

41


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

NOTE M—Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

 

Due to the nature of the industry the Company sells its oil and natural gas production to a limited number of purchasers and, accordingly, amounts receivable from such purchasers could be significant. Revenues from these sources as a percent of total revenues for the periods presented were as follows:

 

    

Year Ended

December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


    

2000


 

Reliant Energy

  

45

%

  

56

%

  

48

%

Conoco, Inc

  

17

%

  

 

  

 

Shell Trading

  

17

%

  

 

  

 

Genesis Crude Oil, L.P.

  

5

%

  

22

%

  

27

%

Gulfmark Energy, Inc.

  

 

  

 

  

10

%

 

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company contracted with Louis Dreyfus Corporation as its major gas purchaser in lieu of Reliant Energy.

 

NOTE N—Commitments and Contingencies

 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has identified the Company as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for the cost of clean-up of “hazardous substances” at an oil field waste disposal site in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. The Company estimates that the remaining cost of long-term clean-up of the site will be approximately $3.5 million, with the Company’s percentage of responsibility estimated to be approximately 3.05%. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had paid $321,000 in costs related to this matter and accrued $122,500 for the remaining liability. These costs have not been discounted to their present value. The EPA and the PRPs will continue to evaluate the site and revise estimates for the long-term clean-up of the site. There can be no assurance that the cost of clean-up and the Company’s percentage responsibility will not be higher than currently estimated. In addition, under the federal environmental laws, the liability costs for the clean-up of the site is joint and several among all PRPs. Therefore, the ultimate cost of the clean-up to the Company could be significantly higher than the amount presently estimated or accrued for this liability.

 

In connection with the acquisition of its Burrwood and West Delta fields, the Company secured a performance bond and established an escrow account to be used for the payment of obligations associated with the plugging and abandonment of the wells, salvage and removal of platforms and related equipment, and the site restoration of the fields. Required escrowed outlays included an initial cash payment of $750,000 and monthly cash payments of $70,000 beginning June 1, 2000 and continuing until June 1, 2005. The escrow agreement was amended in the fourth quarter of 2001 to suspend monthly cash payments and cap the escrow account at its current balance of $2,039,000. In addition, as part of the purchase agreement, the Company agreed to shoot a 3-D seismic survey over the fields which was completed in the fourth quarter of 2001. The cost of the seismic survey was approximately $2,500,000.

 

On February 8, 2000, the Company commenced a suit against the operator and joint owner of the Lafitte field, alleging certain items of misconduct and violations of the agreements associated primarily with the joint acquisition of and unfettered access to a license to 3-D seismic data over the field. The operator has counter-claimed against Goodrich on the grounds that Goodrich was obligated to post a bond to secure the plugging and abandonment obligations in the field. On November 1, 2002 the 125th Judicial District Court of Harris County,

 

42


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

Texas, ruled in favor of the Company stating (1) The Sale and Assignment between the Company and the operator assigned the same rights to the 3-D seismic data that the operator had pursuant to the operator’s data use license agreement from Texaco Exploration and Production, Inc. (“TEPI”); and (2) Also pursuant to the terms of the Sale and Assignment, Goodrich is required to post 49% of the bond liability to TEPI at such time that TEPI requests it. The Court has not determined whether TEPI has already issued the request that would require the Company to post 49% of the bond liability to TEPI. However, in a statement to the Court, TEPI stated that whatever may be the obligation between the operator and Goodrich regarding the requirement, if any, for Goodrich to post a bond in favor of the operator covering Goodrich’s P&A obligations, TEPI does not claim that it is entitled to any bond unless and until the operator’s total shareholder value (as defined in the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the operator and TEPI) falls below $80 million. The damages portion of the suit is ongoing and it is too early to predict a likely outcome, however, this action is not expected to have a significantly adverse impact on the operations or financial position of the Company.

 

The Company is party to additional lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. The Company intends to defend these actions vigorously and believes, based on currently available information, that adverse results or judgments from such actions, if any, will not be material to its financial position or results of operations.

 

NOTE O—Natural Gas and Crude Oil Cost Data

 

The following reflects the Company’s capitalized costs related to natural gas and oil activities at December 31, 2002, and 2001:

 

    

2002


    

2001


 

Proved properties

  

$

101,016,271

 

  

102,730,448

 

Unproved properties

  

 

4,954,897

 

  

5,289,301

 

    


  

    

 

105,971,168

 

  

108,019,749

 

Less accumulated depreciation and depletion

  

 

(38,558,059

)

  

(32,981,657

)

    


  

Net property and equipment

  

$

67,413,109

 

  

75,038,092

 

    


  

 

The following table reflects certain data with respect to cost incurred in natural gas and oil property acquisitions, exploration and development activities:

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


 
    

2002


  

2001


  

2000


 

Property acquisition

                  

Proved

  

$

  

175,110

  

1,198,631

(a)

Unproved

  

 

  

2,186,111

  

820,200

 

Exploration

  

 

1,128,855

  

4,174,348

  

2,797,642

 

Development

  

 

7,843,730

  

28,972,446

  

13,862,296

 

    

  
  

    

$

8,972,585

  

35,508,015

  

18,678,769

 

    

  
  


(a) Burrwood and West Delta fields acquisition

 

43


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

NOTE P—Related Party Transactions

 

On June 1, 2001 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Patrick E. Malloy, III, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, under which Mr. Malloy provides the Company advice on hedging and financial matters. The contract, which expires in May 2003, pays Mr. Malloy $120,000 per year. The Company paid Mr. Malloy $120,000 in 2002 and $70,000 in 2001.

 

On March 12, 2002, the Company completed the sale of a thirty percent (30%) working interest in the existing production and shallow rights, and a fifteen percent (15%) working interest in the deep rights below 10,600 feet, in its Burrwood and West Delta fields for $12 million to Malloy Energy Company, LLC, led by Patrick E. Malloy, III and participated in by Sheldon Appel and Josiah Austin, all members of the Company’s Board of Directors (Mr. Malloy is now Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors). See Note C for further information regarding the sale.

 

NOTE Q—Supplemental Oil and Gas Reserve Information (Unaudited)

 

The supplemental oil and gas reserve information that follows is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 69, Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities. The schedules provide users with a common base for preparing estimates of future cash flows and comparing reserves among companies. Additional background information follows concerning the schedules.

 

Schedules 1 and 2—Estimated Net Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

 

Substantially all of the Company’s reserve information related to crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids and natural gas was compiled based on evaluations performed by Coutret and Associates, Inc. All of the subject reserves are located in the continental United States.

 

Many assumptions and judgmental decisions are required to estimate reserves. Quantities reported are considered reasonable but are subject to future revisions, some of which may be substantial, as additional information becomes available. Such additional knowledge may be gained as the result of reservoir performance, new geological and geophysical data, additional drilling, technological advancements, price changes, and other factors.

 

Regulations published by the Securities and Exchange Commission define proved reserves as those volumes of crude oil, condensate, and natural gas liquids and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty are recoverable from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those volumes expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped reserves are those volumes expected to be recovered as a result of making additional investments by drilling new wells on acreage offsetting productive units or recompleting existing wells.

 

Schedule 3—Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

 

SFAS No. 69 requires calculation of future net cash flows using a ten percent annual discount factor and year end prices, costs, and statutory tax rates, except for known future changes such as contracted prices and legislated tax rates.

 

The calculated value of proved reserves is not necessarily indicative of either fair market value or present value of future cash flows because prices, costs, and governmental policies do not remain static; appropriate

 

44


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

discount rates may vary; and extensive judgment is required to estimate the timing of production. Other logical assumptions would likely have resulted in significantly different amounts.

 

Schedule 3 also presents a summary of the principal reasons for change in the standard measure of discounted future net cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002.

 

Schedule 1—Estimated Net Proved Gas Reserves (Mcf)

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


    

2000


 

Proved:

                    

Balance, beginning of period

  

33,956,250

 

  

29,510,679

 

  

20,849,592

 

Revisions of previous estimates

  

29,807

 

  

6,070

 

  

708,580

 

Purchase of minerals in place

  

 

  

1,527,172

 

  

5,955,477

 

Extensions, discoveries, and other additions

  

3,848,920

 

  

6,735,556

 

  

5,546,322

 

Production

  

(2,477,790

)

  

(3,823,227

)

  

(3,394,921

)

Sale of minerals in place

  

(6,287,637

)

  

 

  

(154,371

)

    

  

  

Balance, end of period

  

29,069,550

 

  

33,956,250

 

  

29,510,679

 

    

  

  

Proved developed:

                    

Beginning of period

  

16,692,390

 

  

22,251,970

 

  

13,945,540

 

End of period

  

15,203,255

 

  

16,692,390

 

  

22,251,970

 

 

Schedule 2—Estimated Net Proved Oil Reserves (Barrels)

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


    

2000


 

Proved:

                    

Balance, beginning of period

  

8,750,420

 

  

6,789,358

 

  

5,738,997

 

Revisions of previous estimates

  

28,476

 

  

(5,602

)

  

74,369

 

Purchase of minerals in place

  

 

  

30,829

 

  

891,334

 

Extensions, discoveries, and other additions

  

120,970

 

  

2,517,515

 

  

665,911

 

Production

  

(451,564

)

  

(581,680

)

  

(571,766

)

Sale of minerals in place

  

(1,006,962

)

  

 

  

(9,487

)

    

  

  

Balance, end of period

  

7,441,340

 

  

8,750,420

 

  

6,789,358

 

    

  

  

Proved, developed:

                    

Beginning of period

  

3,399,610

 

  

3,196,330

 

  

2,662,907

 

End of period

  

2,556,670

 

  

3,399,610

 

  

3,196,330

 

 

45


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

December 31, 2002

 

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s combined oil and gas reserve information on a Mcf equivalent basis. Estimates of oil reserves were converted using a conversion ratio of 1.0/6.0 Mcf.

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


    

2002


  

2001


  

2000


Estimated Net Proved Reserves (Mcfe):

              

Total Proved

  

73,717,590

  

86,458,770

  

70,246,827

Proved Developed

  

30,543,570

  

37,090,050

  

41,429,950

 

Schedule 3—Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Related to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


    

2000


 
    

(in thousands)

 

Future cash inflows

  

$

313,883

 

  

220,367

 

  

452,310

 

Production costs

  

 

(54,345

)

  

(59,906

)

  

(55,948

)

Development costs

  

 

(28,953

)

  

(35,673

)

  

(25,201

)

Future income tax expense

  

 

(44,292

)

  

(8,972

)

  

(101,113

)

    


  

  

Future net cash flows

  

 

186,293

 

  

115,816

 

  

270,048

 

10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows

  

 

(62,031

)

  

(42,694

)

  

(90,268

)

    


  

  

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  

$

124,262

 

  

73,122

 

  

179,780

 

    


  

  

Average year end prices:

                      

Natural gas (per Mcf)

  

$

4.35

 

  

2.51

 

  

10.06

 

Crude oil (per Bbl)

  

$

28.80

 

  

17.91

 

  

26.10

 

 

The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted net cash flows for the years shown:

 

    

Year Ended December 31,


 
    

2002


    

2001


    

2000


 
    

(in thousands)

 

Net changes in prices and production costs related to future production

  

$

84,143

 

  

(209,020

)

  

91,250

 

Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs

  

 

(9,548

)

  

(21,100

)

  

(21,100

)

Net change due to revisions in quantity estimates

  

 

413

 

  

(26

)

  

4,112

 

Net change due to extensions, discoveries and improved recovery

  

 

9,393

 

  

19,930

 

  

33,974

 

Net change due to purchase and sales of minerals-in-place

  

 

(25,314

)

  

1,562

 

  

39,485

 

Development costs incurred during the period

  

 

6,720

 

  

11,767

 

  

1,127

 

Net change in income taxes

  

 

(21,738

)

  

64,557

 

  

(56,485

)

Accretion of discount

  

 

7,889

 

  

25,011

 

  

9,241

 

Change in production rates (timing) and other

  

 

(818

)

  

661

 

  

(385

)

    


  

  

    

$

51,140

 

  

(106,658

)

  

101,219

 

    


  

  

 

46


GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION

 

Consolidated Quarterly Income Information

(Unaudited)

 

    

First

Quarter


    

Second

Quarter


    

Third

Quarter


    

Fourth

Quarter


    

Total


 

2002

                                    

Revenues

  

$

4,699,682

 

  

4,308,024

 

  

4,258,020

 

  

5,834,203

 

  

19,099,929

 

Costs and Expenses

  

 

5,594,856

 

  

5,596,170

 

  

4,796,331

 

  

5,810,119

 

  

21,797,476

 

Gain (loss) on sale of assets

  

 

2,836,501

 

  

87,700

 

  

(80,393

)

  

97,254

 

  

2,941,062

 

Income taxes

  

 

679,464

 

  

(420,156

)

  

(216,546

)

  

45,886

 

  

88,648

 

Net income (Loss)

  

 

1,261,863

 

  

(780,290

)

  

(402,158

)

  

75,452

 

  

154,867

 

Preferred stock dividends

  

 

154,798

 

  

168,223

 

  

158,366

 

  

158,366

 

  

639,753

 

Income (Loss) applicable to common Stock

  

 

1,107,065

 

  

(948,513

)

  

(560,524

)

  

(82,914

)

  

(484,886

)

Basic earnings (Loss) per average common share

  

 

.06

 

  

(.05

)

  

(.03

)

  

(.00

)

  

(.03

)

Diluted earnings (Loss) per average common share

  

 

.05

 

  

(.05

)

  

(.03

)

  

(.00

)

  

(.03

)

2001

                                    

Revenues

  

$

9,405,690

 

  

7,336,497

 

  

7,748,452

 

  

5,404,140

 

  

29,894,779

 

Costs and Expenses

  

 

5,936,133

 

  

6,375,295

 

  

5,650,079

 

  

7,725,735

 

  

25,687,242

 

Gain (loss) on sale of assets

  

 

38,380

 

  

33,606

 

  

 

  

(45,207

)

  

26,779

 

Income taxes

  

 

1,227,778

 

  

348,172

 

  

734,432

 

  

(823,312

)

  

1,487,070

 

Net income (Loss)

  

 

2,280,159

 

  

646,636

 

  

1,363,941

 

  

(1,543,490

)

  

2,747,246

 

Preferred stock dividends

  

 

2,534,908

 

  

158,367

 

  

154,798

 

  

154,799

 

  

3,002,872

 

Income (Loss) applicable to common Stock

  

 

(254,749

)

  

488,269

 

  

1,209,143

 

  

(1,698,289

)

  

(255,626

)

Basic earnings (Loss) per average common share

  

 

(.02

)

  

.03

 

  

.07

 

  

(.09

)

  

(.01

)

Diluted earnings (Loss) per average common share

  

 

(.02

)

  

.02

 

  

.06

 

  

(.09

)

  

(.01

)

 

The fourth quarter of 2002 and 2001 amount includes impairment of oil and gas properties of $342,000 and $1,801,000, respectively.

 

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

 

None

 

47


PART III

 

Item 10.    Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

 

The Company’s executive officers and directors and their ages and positions as of March 15, 2003 are as follows:

 

Name


  

Age


  

Position


Patrick E. Malloy, III

  

60

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors

Walter G. “Gil” Goodrich

  

44

  

Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Robert C. Turnham, Jr

  

45

  

President and Chief Operating Officer

D. Hughes Watler, Jr

  

54

  

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Henry Goodrich

  

72

  

Chairman-Emeritus and Director

Sheldon Appel

  

69

  

Director

Josiah T. Austin

  

55

  

Director

Donald M. Campbell

  

63

  

Director

Michael Y. McGovern

  

51

  

Director

Michael J. Perdue

  

48

  

Director

Arthur A. Seeligson

  

44

  

Director

 

Patrick E. Malloy, III became Chairman of the Board of Directors in February 2003. He has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Malloy Enterprises, Inc., a real estate and investment holding company, and Malloy Real Estate, Inc. since 1973. In addition, Mr. Malloy served as a director of North Fork Bancorp (NYSE) from 1998 to 2002 and was Chairman of the Board of New York Bancorp (NYSE) from 1991 to 1998. He joined the Company’s Board in May 2000.

 

Walter G. “Gil” Goodrich became Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors in February 2003. He has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since August 1995. Mr. Goodrich was Goodrich Oil Company’s Vice President of Exploration from 1985 to 1989 and its President from 1989 to August 1995. He joined Goodrich Oil Company as an exploration geologist in 1980. Gil Goodrich is the son of Henry Goodrich. He has served as one of the Company’s directors since August 15, 1995.

 

Robert C. Turnham, Jr. has served as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer since August 1995 and became President and Chief Operating Officer in February 2003. He has held various positions in the oil and natural gas business since 1981. From 1981 to 1984, Mr. Turnham served as a financial analyst for Pennzoil. In 1984, he formed Turnham Interests, Inc. to pursue oil and natural gas investment opportunities. From 1993 to August 1995, he was a partner in and served as President of Liberty Production Company, an oil and natural gas exploration and production company.

 

D. Hughes Watler, Jr. joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in 2003. Mr. Watler is a former partner of Price Waterhouse LLP in their Houston and Tulsa offices, and was the Chief Financial Officer of Texoil, Inc, a public exploration & production company from 1992 to 1995, as well as XPRONET, a private international oil & gas exploration company from 1998 to 2002. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Watler served as the Corporate Controller for TPC Corporation, a NYSE listed midstream natural gas company.

 

Henry Goodrich is the Chairman of the Board of Directors-Emeritus. He is a petroleum geologist with over 47 years experience in the oil and natural gas industry. Mr. Goodrich served as an exploration geologist with the Union Producing Company and McCord Oil Company. From 1971 to 1975, Mr. Goodrich was President, Chief Executive Officer and a partner of McCord-Goodrich Oil Company. In 1975, Mr. Goodrich formed Goodrich Oil Company. He was elected to the Company’s board in August 1995, and served as Chairman of the Board from March 1996 through February, 2003. Mr. Goodrich is also a director of Pan American Life Insurance Company. Henry Goodrich is the father of Gil Goodrich.

 

48


 

Sheldon Appel has been involved in real estate development and finance since 1955 when he formed the Sheldon Appel Company. Mr. Appel is a private investor and a former director of American Consumer Products and Beverly Hills Savings and Loan, both of which were listed on the NYSE. He has been one of the Company’s directors since August 1995.

 

Josiah T. Austin is the managing member of El Coronado Holdings, L.L.C., a privately owned investment holding company. He and his family own and operate agricultural properties in the state of Arizona and northern Sonora, Mexico through El Coronado Ranch & Cattle Company, L.L.C. and other entities. Mr. Austin presently serves on the Board of Directors of Monterey Bay Bancorp of Watsonville, California, and is a prior board member of New York Bancorp, Inc., which merged with North Fork Bancorporation in early 1998. He is an active investor in publicly traded financial institutions. He became one of the Company’s directors in 2002.

 

Donald M. Campbell is the Chief Executive Officer of Guaranty Finance Management L.L.C., which became the manager of Hambrecht and Quist Guaranty Finance L.L.C. on January 1, 2002. Prior to that time, Mr. Campbell served as the chief executive officer of Hambrecht & Quist Guaranty Finance L.L.C., and its predecessor entities, since 1985. Hambrecht and Quist Guaranty Finance L.L.C., is a subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase. He is also a director of the Moneda Chile Fund (listed on the Bermuda Stock Exchange) and Evergreen Forests Ltd. (listed on the New Zealand and Australian Stock Exchanges), and is the chairman of The New Zealand Investment Trust (listed on the London and New Zealand Stock Exchanges). He has been a financial officer of two public corporations, and has been a principal in the formation of four private companies in the United States. He has served as one of the Company’s directors since November 1999, when he was elected by the holders of the Company’s subsidiaries’ notes pursuant to the Company’s agreement with H&Q Guaranty as noteholder agent.

 

Michael Y. McGovern has been the Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Companies Inc. since 2002. From 2000 to 2002, he was Chief Executive Officer of Coho Energy Resources, Inc. Prior to that time, he was the Managing Director for Pembrook Capital Corporation, Inc. from 1998 to January 2000, which provided advisory services to parties involved with distressed energy companies. He has also been a director and founding investor of Greystar Corporation since 1995, which provides production management services to oil and natural gas companies. He has served as one of the Company’s directors since September 1999, when he was elected by the holders of the Company’s subsidiaries’ notes pursuant to the Company’s agreement with H&Q Guaranty as noteholders agent.

 

Michael J. Perdue is currently Executive Vice President of Entrepreneurial Corporate Group and is President of its subsidiary, Entrepreneurial Capital Corporation. Prior to joining ECG in April 1999, Mr. Perdue served as Senior Vice President and Regional Manager of Zions Bancorporation from May 1998 to April 1999 and as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director of FP Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Pacific National Bank, from September 1993 until FP Bancorp’s acquisition by Zions Bancorporation in May 1998. He has also held senior management positions with Rampac, Inc., a real estate development company, and PacWest Bancorp. Mr. Perdue currently serves on the boards of the ECG affiliated companies. He was elected to the Company’s Board of Directors in January 2001.

 

Arthur A. Seeligson is currently engaged in the management of his personal investments. From 1991 to 1993, Mr. Seeligson was a Vice President, Energy Corporate Finance at Schroder Wertheim & Company, Inc. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Seeligson was a Principal, Corporate Finance, at Wasserstein, Perella & Co. He was primarily engaged in the management of his personal investments from 1995 through 1997. He was a managing director with the investment banking firm of Harris, Webb & Garrison from 1997 to June 2000. He has served as one of the Company’s directors since August 1995.

 

49


 

Item 11.    Executive Compensation.

 

*

 

Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

 

*

 

Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

 

*


*   Reference is made to information under the captions “Executive Compensation”, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”, and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”, in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

PART IV

 

Item 14.    Controls and Procedures.

 

The Company, under the direction of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has established controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating o the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to the officers who certify the company’s financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of Directors.

 

Based on their evaluation as of a date within 90 days of the filing of the Annual Report on form 10-K, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the information required to the disclosed by Goodrich Petroleum Corporation in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.

 

There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls subsequent to the date of their most recent evaluation.

 

50


PART IV

 

Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.

 

(a)    1. Financial Statements

 

The following consolidated financial statements of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation are included in Part II, Item 8:

 

    

Page


Independent Auditors’ Report

  

23

Consolidated Balance Sheets—December 31, 2002 and 2001

  

24

Consolidated Statements of Operations—Years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

  

25

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

  

26

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income —Years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000

  

27

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Year ended December 31, 2002

  

28-46

Consolidated Quarterly Income Information (Unaudited)

  

47

 

2.    Financial Statement Schedules

 

The schedules for which provision is made in Regulation S-X are not required under the instructions contained therein, are inapplicable, or the information is included in the footnotes to the financial statements.

 

(b)    Reports on Form 8-K

 

None

 

(c)    Exhibits

 

3(i).1

  

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation dated March 12, 1998 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s First Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-47078) filed November 22, 2000.

3(ii).1

  

Bylaws of the Company, as amended and restated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of the

Company’s First Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-47078) filed November 22, 2000.

4.1

  

Specimen Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company’s

Registration Statement filed February 20, 1996 on Form S-8 (File No. 33-01077)).

4.2

  

Credit Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Company, L.L.C. and BNP Paribas dated November 9, 2001 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

10.1

  

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21

to the Company’s Registration Statement filed June 13, 1995 on Form S-4 (File No. 33-58631)).

10.2

  

Consulting Services Agreement between Patrick E. Malloy and Goodrich Petroleum Corporation dated June 1, 2001 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).

10.3

  

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation 1997 Director Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed April 27, 1998).

 

51


10.4

  

Form of Subscription Agreement dated September 27, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1

of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 15, 1999).

10.5

  

Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 29, 2000 (Registration No. 333-47078).

10.6

  

Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on October 3, 2001 (Registration No. 333-70840).

*10.7

  

Purchase and Sale Agreement between Goodrich Petroleum Company, LLC and Malloy Energy Company, LLC, dated March 4, 2002.

21

  

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

    

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Inc. of Louisiana—incorporated in the state of Nevada

    

Subsidiaries of Goodrich Petroleum Company of Louisiana

    

    Drilling & Workover Company, Inc.—incorporated in state of Louisiana

    

    LECE, Inc.—incorporated in the state of Texas

    

    National Marketing Company—incorporated in state of Delaware

    

Goodrich Petroleum Company LLC—incorporated in state of Louisiana

    

Goodrich Petroleum Lafitte, LLC—incorporated in state of Louisiana

*23

  

Consent of KPMG LLP.

*99.1

  

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*99.2

  

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


*   Filed herewith.

 

52


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

        

GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION

    (Registrant)

   

By:

  

/s/    WALTER G. GOODRICH      


Date: March 27, 2003

      

Walter G. Goodrich

Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Date: March 27, 2003

 

Signature


  

Title


/s/    WALTER G. GOODRICH        


Walter G. Goodrich

  

Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/    D. HUGHES WATLER, JR.        


D. Hughes Watler, Jr.

  

Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/    KIRKLAND H. PARNELL        


Kirkland H. Parnell

  

Vice President (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/    PATRICK E. MALLOY, III      


Patrick E. Malloy, III

  

Chairman of Board of Directors

/s/    SHELDON APPEL      


Sheldon Appel

  

Director

/s/    HENRY GOODRICH      


Henry Goodrich

  

Director

/s/    ARTHUR A. SEELIGSON      


Arthur A. Seeligson

  

Director

/s/    DONALD M. CAMPBELL      


Donald M. Campbell

  

Director

/s/    MICHAEL Y. MCGOVERN      


Michael Y. McGovern

  

Director

/s/    MICHAEL J. PERDUE      


Michael J. Perdue

  

Director

/s/    JOSIAH T. AUSTIN      


Josiah T. Austin

  

Director

 

53


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Walter G. Goodrich, certify that:

 

  1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation;

 

  2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.

 

  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

  c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

  6.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: March 27, 2003

 

/s/ Walter G. Goodrich


Walter G. Goodrich

Chief Executive Officer

 

54


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, D. Hughes Watler, Jr., certify that:

 

  1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation;

 

  2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.

 

  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

  d)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

  e)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

  f)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

  a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

  b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

  6.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date: March 27, 2003

 

/s/ D. Hughes Watler, Jr.


D. Hughes Watler, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

 

55

EX-10.7 3 dex107.txt PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT 10.7 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT BURRWOOD AND WEST DELTA 83 FIELDS BETWEEN GOODRICH PETROLEUM COMPANY, L.L.C. ("SELLER") AND MALLOY OIL AND GAS ACQUISITION COMPANY, L.L.C. ("BUYER") DATED AS OF MARCH 4, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1 PURCHASE AND SALE......................................... 1 ARTICLE 2 PURCHASE PRICE AND ALLOCATION............................. 4 2.1 Purchase Price............................................ 4 2.2 Payment................................................... 4 2.3 Allocation of Purchase Price.............................. 4 2.4 Asset Classification...................................... 5 ARTICLE 3 ACCESS TO ASSETS AND DATA; DISCLAIMERS AND REPRESENTATIONS........................................... 5 3.1 Access.................................................... 5 3.2 Disclaimer................................................ 6 3.2.1 Title............................................ 6 3.2.2 Other............................................ 7 3.2.3 Data............................................. 7 3.3 Representations of Seller................................. 8 3.3.1 Violations....................................... 8 3.3.2 Payment of Royalties and Taxes................... 8 3.3.3 Plugging Proposals............................... 9 3.3.4 Litigation....................................... 9 3.3.5 Percentage Interests............................. 9 3.3.6 Contracts........................................ 10 3.3.7 No Consents Required............................. 10 3.4 Seller Liabilities........................................ 10 ARTICLE 4 TITLE..................................................... 11 4.1 Title Defects............................................. 11 4.1.1 Adverse Claims................................... 11 4.1.2 Decreased Net Revenue Interest................... 12 4.1.3 Increased Working Interest....................... 12 4.1.4 Reversions....................................... 12 4.1.5 Consents and Preferential Rights................. 12 4.2 Notices................................................... 13 4.3 Remedies for Title Defects................................ 13 4.4 Threshold................................................. 14 ARTICLE 5 CLOSING................................................... 14 5.1 Closing Settlement Statement.............................. 14 5.2 Closing Date and Place.................................... 14 5.3 Closing Activities........................................ 15 5.3.1 Certificates..................................... 15 5.3.2 Assignment....................................... 15 5.3.3 Payment.......................................... 15 5.3.4 Possession....................................... 15 5.3.5 Letters-in-Lieu.................................. 16 5.4 Conditions to Closing..................................... 16 5.4.1 Seller's Conditions to Closing................... 16 5.4.2 Buyer's Conditions to Closing.................... 16 i ARTICLE 6 ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS.................................... 17 6.1 Recordation and Filing of Documents....................... 17 6.2 Records................................................... 18 6.3 Final Settlement Statement................................ 18 6.4 Further Assurances........................................ 19 ARTICLE 7 TAXES..................................................... 19 7.1 Property Taxes............................................ 19 7.2 Production Taxes.......................................... 20 7.3 Other Taxes............................................... 21 ARTICLE 8 OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTIES................................... 21 8.1 Distribution of Production................................ 21 8.2 Proration of Income and Expenses.......................... 22 8.3 Notice to Remitters of Proceeds........................... 23 ARTICLE 9 SELLER-OPERATED ASSETS.................................... 23 9.1 Standard of Care.......................................... 23 9.2 Operations................................................ 23 ARTICLE 10 RELATED AGREEMENTS, THIRD-PARTY NOTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL.............................................. 25 10.1 Related Agreements........................................ 25 10.2 Third Party Notifications and Approvals................... 26 10.3 Exchange Provision........................................ 26 ARTICLE 11 INDEMNITY................................................. 27 ARTICLE 12 ENVIRONMENTAL............................................. 28 12.1 Material Adverse Environmental Conditions................. 28 12.2 Environmental Indemnification............................. 30 ARTICLE 13 BUYER'S REPRESENTATIONS................................... 30 13.1 Intent of Acquisition..................................... 30 13.2 Information............................................... 31 13.3 Knowledge and Experience.................................. 31 13.4 Closing................................................... 31 ARTICLE 14 GAS IMBALANCES............................................ 31 14.1 Seller's and Buyer's Respective Obligations............... 31 14.2 Adjustment to Purchase Price.............................. 32 ARTICLE 15 CASUALTY LOSS............................................. 33 ARTICLE 16 AREA OF MUTUAL INTEREST................................... 34 ARTICLE 17 BROKER'S AND FINDER'S FEES................................ 35 ARTICLE 18 NOTICES................................................... 35 ARTICLE 19 DEFAULT................................................... 36 ARTICLE 20 TERMINATION............................................... 36 ARTICLE 21 ARBITRATION............................................... 37 21.1 Resolution of Disputes.................................... 37 21.2 Arbitration............................................... 38 21.3 Arbitration Procedures.................................... 39 21.4 Other..................................................... 40 ARTICLE 22 MISCELLANEOUS............................................. 40 22.1 Entire Agreement.......................................... 40 ii 22.2 Survival.................................................. 40 22.3 Choice of Law............................................. 41 22.4 Assignment................................................ 41 22.5 No Admissions............................................. 41 22.6 Third-Party Beneficiaries................................. 41 22.7 Public Communications..................................... 41 22.8 Headings.................................................. 42 22.9 Waiver.................................................... 42 22.10 Counterparts and Execution................................ 42 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A shall include the following information: (1) Identification of lands subject to this agreement; (2) Restrictions, if any, as to depths, formations or substances; (3) Percentages or fractional interests of Assignors; (4) Oil and gas leases and/or oil and gas interests subject to this Agreement (5) Right-of-Way Agreements (6) Operating Agreements (7) Unit Agreements (8) Miscellaneous (9) Surface Leases, Easement and Slant Well Permits Exhibit B - Allocation of Purchase Price Exhibit C - Wells to be plugged and abandoned Exhibit D - Lawsuits Exhibit E - Form of Assignment Exhibit F - Aggregate gas imbalance Exhibit G - AMI boundaries Exhibit H - Proportionate share of Acquired Interests iii PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT BURWOOD AND WEST DELTA 83 FIELDS This Purchase and Sale Agreement ("Agreement"), made as of March 4, 2002 ("Execution Date") by and between GOODRICH PETROLEUM COMPANY, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company, with a place of business at 815 Walker, Suite 2040, Houston, Texas 77002 ("Seller") and MALLOY ENERGY COMPANY, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, with a place of business at Bay Street on the Waterfront, Sag Harbor, New York 11963 ("Buyer"). (Buyer and Seller are sometimes referred to below individually as a "party" or collectively as "the parties"): WHEREAS, Buyer desires to purchase from Seller, and Seller desires to sell to Buyer, certain property on the terms and conditions set forth below; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, Buyer and Seller agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 1. PURCHASE AND SALE Seller agrees to sell to Buyer and Buyer agrees to buy from Seller, effective as of 12:00 a.m., local time, where the Assets (as defined below) are located on January 1, 2002 (the "Effective Time"), for the consideration recited and subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, the undivided interests set forth below in and to the following: a. An undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in the "shallow rights" (as described in Exhibit A) and an undivided fifteen percent (15%) interest in the "deep rights" (as described in Exhibit A), under the leasehold estates 1 created by the oil and gas leases described in Exhibit A hereto (the "Leases") and the lands covered thereby (the "Lands"), together with all overriding royalty interests, production payments and other payments out of or measured by the value of oil and gas production from or attributable to the Leases; b. An undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in the oil and gas wells located on the Leases hereto and any other wellbores, plugged or unplugged, shut in, or permanently or temporarily abandoned that are located on the Leases (the "Wells"); c. An undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in all of the personal property, fixtures and improvements appurtenant to the Wells, or the Leases or used or obtained in connection with the operation of the Wells, or the Leases or with the production, treatment, sale or disposal of hydrocarbons or water produced therefrom or attributable thereto, including without limitation, salt water disposal wells, pipelines, gathering lines and systems and compression facilities appurtenant to or located upon the Leases (the "Personalty"); d. An undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in all oil, gas and other hydrocarbons produced from or attributable to the "shallow rights" under the Leases after the Effective Time and proceeds from the sale thereof and an undivided fifteen percent (15%) interest in all oil, gas and other hydrocarbons produced from or attributable to the "deep rights" under the 2 Leases after the Effective Time and proceeds from the sale thereof ("Hydrocarbons"); e. To the extent transferable, an undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in all agreements, product purchase and sale contracts, surface leases, gas gathering contracts, salt water disposal leases, processing agreements, compression agreements, equipment leases, permits, rights-of-way, easements, licenses, farmouts and farmins, options, orders, pooling, spacing or consolidation agreements and operating agreements, including rights of operatorship thereunder, and all other agreements relating to the Wells, Leases, Hydrocarbons and Personalty (the "Contracts"); f. To the extent transferable at no cost or liability to Goodrich, an undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in all seismic licenses, permits and all other rights to geological and/or geophysical data and information relating to the Wells, Leases, Hydrocarbons and Personalty (the "Seismic Rights"); g. An undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in that certain escrow account no. 5149 at Compass Bank, Texas, Houston, Texas, and a like interest in all proceeds therein, as more fully described on Exhibit A (the "Escrow Account"); and h. An undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in all the property, rights, privileges, benefits and appurtenances in any way belonging to, incidental to, or appertaining to the property, interests and rights described above, including the Wells, Leases, Personalty, Lands, Contracts, Hydrocarbons and Seismic Rights (the "Benefits"). 3 Such undivided interests in the Wells, Leases, Lands, Personalty, Contracts, Hydrocarbons, Seismic Rights, Escrow Account and Benefits are hereinafter referred to as the "Assets." To the extent any of the Contracts, Seismic Rights or Benefits relate to the "deep rights" (as described in Exhibit A), the undivided interest to be transferred to Buyer shall be limited to fifteen percent (15%). The applicable files, records and data (or copies thereof), directly relating to the Assets including, without limitation, land and lease files, well files, title records including abstracts of title, title opinions, production records, all logs including electric logs, core data, pressure data and decline curves and graphical production curves and all related materials in the possession of Seller are hereinafter referred to as the "Records". ARTICLE 2 2. PURCHASE PRICE AND ALLOCATION 2.1 Purchase Price - Buyer agrees to pay for the Assets the total sum of Twelve Million Dollars (US $12,000,000) ("Purchase Price") in cash, subject only to any price adjustments, as set forth in this Agreement. 2.2 Payment - The Purchase Price shall be paid at Closing, by wire transfer in immediately available funds, to Goodrich Petroleum Company, L.L.C., Account No. 79515809, Compass Bank, Houston, Texas, ABA #113010547. 2.3 Allocation of Purchase Price - Seller and Buyer agree that the Purchase Price shall be allocated among the Assets as set forth on Exhibit B, Parts I and II (the "Allocated Value") for the purpose of (i) establishing a basis for certain taxes, (ii) obtaining waivers of any preferential rights to 4 purchase the Assets, (iii) determining the value of a Title Defect, and (iv) handling those instances for which the Purchase Price is to be adjusted. As used hereinafter, the term "Property" shall mean and refer to any one of the individual properties listed on Exhibit B to which an Allocated Value has been assigned. 2.4 Asset Classification - Seller and Buyer recognize that reporting requirements as imposed by Section 1060 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the regulations thereunder (the "Code") may apply to the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. Seller and Buyer mutually agree that the Assets sold by Seller to Buyer are Class V assets, and such classification shall be used by Seller and Buyer for the purposes of Section 1060 of the Code. Seller and Buyer also agree that the Purchase Price allocation set forth in Exhibit B shall satisfy the requirements of the Code and shall be used in preparing Internal Revenue Service Form 8594. ARTICLE 3 3. ACCESS TO ASSETS AND DATA; DISCLAIMERS AND REPRESENTATIONS 3.1 Access - Notwithstanding Buyer's prior opportunity to inspect and inventory the Assets and to review information regarding the Assets, promptly after execution of this Agreement and upon request of Buyer, Seller shall provide Buyer and Buyer's authorized representatives, at any reasonable time(s) during the Due Diligence Period (defined below) (i) physical access to the Lands, Wells, and Personalty on or associated with the Leases or other Assets that are Seller-operated, at Buyer's sole risk, 5 cost and expense, to inspect and to conduct any Phase I or other environmental audits of the same and (ii) access to the Contracts, Seismic Rights and Records, to the extent such items are in Seller's possession and relate to the Assets; provided, however, Seller shall have no obligation to provide Buyer access to any interpretative or predictive data or information which Seller believes in good faith it cannot lawfully provide Buyer because of third-party restrictions (to the extent any such data or information is subject to third-party restrictions, Seller will use its good-faith efforts to obtain any consents necessary to allow Buyer to review such data or information). No warranty or representation of any kind is made by Seller, as to the information supplied, and Buyer agrees that any conclusions drawn therefrom shall be the result of its own independent review and judgment. 3.2 Disclaimer - Buyer specifically understands and acknowledges the following: 3.2.1 Title - Title to the Assets shall be transferred and conveyed without representation or warranty of title, express or implied, except as to claims arising by, through or under Seller. Upon consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, Buyer assumes the risk of any title defects and/or conflicting adverse right(s), title(s) and/or interest(s), except for claims arising by through or under Seller. 6 3.2.2 Other - SELLER EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, AT COMMON LAW, BY STATUTE OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE CONDITION OF THE ASSETS INCLUDING (i) ANY IMPLIED OR EXPRESS WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR OF FREEDOM FROM HIDDEN DEFECTS, (ii) ANY IMPLIED OR EXPRESS WARRANTY OF CONFORMITY TO MODELS OR SAMPLES OF MATERIALS, AND (iii) ANY IMPLIED OR EXPRESS WARRANTY AS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF THE ASSETS, IT BEING EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD BY BUYER THAT THE ASSETS, INCLUDING ALL PERSONAL PROPERTY, FIXTURES AND ITEMS ARE BEING CONVEYED TO BUYER AS IS, WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS, AND IN THEIR PRESENT CONDITION AND STATE OF REPAIR AND THAT BUYER HAS BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE OR CAUSE TO BE MADE SUCH INSPECTIONS AS BUYER DEEMS APPROPRIATE. 3.2.3 Data - EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN SECTION 3.3 HEREOF, SELLER MAKES NO WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY DATA, INFORMATION, OR MATERIALS HERETOFORE OR 7 HEREAFTER FURNISHED TO BUYER IN CONNECTION WITH THE ASSETS, OR AS TO THE QUALITY OR QUANTITY OF HYDROCARBON RESERVES (IF ANY) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE OIL AND GAS INTERESTS OR THE ABILITY OF THE ASSETS TO PRODUCE HYDROCARBONS. ANY AND ALL SUCH DATA, INFORMATION, AND OTHER MATERIALS FURNISHED BY SELLER IS PROVIDED TO BUYER AS A CONVENIENCE, AND ANY RELIANCE ON OR USE OF THE SAME SHALL BE AT BUYER'S SOLE RISK. 3.3 Representations of Seller - Seller represents as follows: 3.3.1 Violations - To the best of Seller's knowledge, Seller and its predecessors in title have complied with all laws, statutes, regulations or orders applicable to any of the Wells, Leases, Lands, Personalty, Contracts, Hydrocarbons, Seismic Rights or Benefits or to the operation thereof, noncompliance with which might materially and adversely affect the value of the Assets or prevent, frustrate, interfere with or hinder the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 3.3.2 Payment of Royalties and Taxes - To the best of Seller's knowledge, all royalties and all ad valorem, property, production, severance and similar taxes with respect to the Assets which accrued during the period when Seller owned the Assets and prior 8 to the Effective Time, have been properly and fully paid, or are included within the suspense amounts tendered to Buyer. 3.3.3 Plugging Proposals - To the best of Seller's knowledge, a complete list of Wells included within the Assets and the status of each well is shown on Exhibit A. There are no unplugged wells which are currently required to be plugged under applicable governmental regulations as of Closing or for which Seller has received and/or generated an AFE for plugging. 3.3.4 Litigation - To the best of Seller's knowledge, Exhibit C contains a list of all pending lawsuits involving the Assets. 3.3.5 Percentage Interests - Upon consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and subject only to the adjustments expressly provided for herein, Buyer will own an undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in the "shallow rights" (defined on Exhibit A attached hereto) and an undivided fifteen percent (15%) interest in the "deep rights" (defined on Exhibit A attached hereto) in the Leases together with an undivided thirty percent (30%) interest in the Wells. Such interests (i) entitle Seller to receive not less than the undivided net revenue interests set forth in Exhibit A under the heading, "NRI", in hydrocarbons produced, saved and sold from the Lands under the terms of the Leases; and (ii) obligate Seller to bear and pay no more of the costs and expenses of the development 9 and operation of the Lands than the undivided working interests set forth in Exhibit A under the heading, "WI". 3.3.6 Contracts - To the best of Seller's knowledge, the exhibits attached to this agreement contain an accurate and complete listing of all Contracts affecting the Assets, and all such Contracts are presently valid, subsisting and in full force and effect in all material respects. 3.3.7 No Consents Required - To the best of Seller's knowledge, except as set forth in Exhibit A or consents required from state, federal or other governmental authority as part of an ordinary course transfer or which are customarily obtained after closing, no preferential rights, consents, approvals or other action is required in connection with the execution, delivery and performance by Seller of this Agreement. 3.4 Seller Liabilities - NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING HEREIN TO THE CONTRARY, SELLER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL ROYALTIES RELATING TO PERIODS OF TIME PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING HEREIN TO THE CONTRARY, SELLER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL PROPERTY, OCCUPATION, SEVERANCE, AD VALOREM, PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES, AND SIMILAR CHARGES ON ANY OF THE ASSETS, INSFOAR AS SAME RELATE TO PERIODS OF TIME PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME. 10 ARTICLE 4 4. TITLE 4.1 Title Defects - Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any Title Defect affecting any Property as soon as possible after discovering the Title Defect but, in any event, within fifteen (15) days after Execution Date (the "Due Diligence Period"). For the purpose of this Agreement, a "Title Defect" shall mean a material deficiency which individually per Property diminishes the value of that Property by at least Five Thousand Dollars (US $5,000) in one (or more) of the following respects: 4.1.1 Adverse Claims - Seller's title as to all or part of any Property is subject to (i) an outstanding mortgage deed of trust, lien or other security interest; (ii) a pending cause of action in which a competing ownership interest in any Property is claimed or implied; or (iii) other adverse claim not disclosed on Exhibit A which, if brought to the attention of a purchaser of production from such Property, would be likely to cause such purchaser of production to suspend payment of proceeds from such Property. Notwithstanding the above, all irregularities of title that would not reasonably be expected to result in claims that would materially and adversely affect Seller's title to any Property shall not be considered a Title Defect, including, but not limited to: (i) defects in the early chain of title consisting of failure to recite marital status or the omission of succession or heirship proceedings; (ii) 11 defects or irregularities arising out of prior oil and gas leases which, on their face, expired more than ten (10) years prior to the Effective Time, and which have not been released of record; (iii) defects or irregularities arising out of mortgages or deeds of trust which, by their terms, matured more than ten (10) years prior to the Effective Time but which remain unreleased of record; (iv) defects or irregularities arising out of the lack of a survey; (v) defects or irregularities arising out of the lack of recorded powers of attorney from corporations to execute and deliver documents on their behalf; and (vi) defects and irregularities cured by possession under applicable statutes of limitation and statutes relating to prescription. 4.1.2 Decreased Net Revenue Interest - Seller owns less than the net revenue interest shown on Exhibit A for a particular Property. 4.1.3 Increased Working Interest - Seller owns more than the working interest shown on Exhibit A for a particular Property without a proportionate increase in the corresponding net revenue interest shown on Exhibit A. 4.1.4 Reversions - A Property is subject to reduction by the exercise by a third party of a reversionary, back-in, or other similar right not reflected in Exhibit A. 4.1.5 Consents and Preferential Rights - A Property is subject to a consent to assign which consent has not been obtained (other than 12 consents or approvals from governmental authorities which are typically obtained after Closing), or is subject to a preferential right to purchase which right has been exercised or has not been waived. 4.2 Notices - Upon discovery of a Title Defect, the Buyer shall immediately notify the Seller in writing of the nature of the Title Defect. Any defect or deficiency not asserted by Buyer during the Due Diligence Period shall be deemed waived by Buyer for all purposes. 4.3 Remedies for Title Defects - Seller may elect to cure any or all Title Defects; provided, however, if a Title Defect is a lien, encumbrance or other charge which is liquidated in amount, Seller reserves the option to retain the obligation of this Title Defect and to challenge the validity of any such Title Defect or any portion thereof and to hold Buyer harmless with regard thereto. In such event, Seller will provide a bond or other instrument necessary to remove the effect of the lien or encumbrance from the Properties. Buyer agrees to cooperate with Seller in such efforts at no risk or expense to Buyer. With these exceptions, if the Seller is unable or unwilling to cure a Title Defect, then the parties may agree, (a) to remove that portion of the Properties affected by the Title Defect from the Properties being conveyed and reduce the Purchase Price by the portion of the Allocated Value set forth on Exhibit B attributable to such affected Properties or (b) for Seller to provide Buyer an indemnity reasonably acceptable to Buyer, as to claims arising from the Title Defect. 13 4.4 Threshold - Notwithstanding the provisions set forth above, a Title Defect shall not result in an adjustment in the Purchase Price unless, and only to the extent that, the aggregate net value of all Title Defects is greater than Fifty Thousand Dollars (US $50,000) (the "Threshold Amount"). In the event the aggregate net value of all Title Defects is greater than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (US $500,000), Buyer shall have the option of terminating the Agreement. ARTICLE 5 5. CLOSING 5.1 Closing Settlement Statement - At least three (3) business days prior to Closing, Seller will provide to Buyer a closing settlement statement covering, but not limited to, ad valorem taxes, severance taxes, crude oil inventories above the pipeline connection, purchase price adjustments, gas imbalance adjustments, state and local sales taxes, suspense amounts tendered to Buyer, and other applicable adjustments credited to Seller or Buyer as of the Effective Time. The oil inventory value at the Effective Time shall be determined as provided for in Article 8. Where actual information is unavailable, Seller shall use estimates in the closing settlement statement based on best available information, and Seller shall incorporate any corrections to such estimates based on actual information in any final settlement statement. 5.2 Closing Date and Place - The closing of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the "Closing") shall be held on or before March 28, 2002, 14 at the offices of Seller at 815 Walker, Suite 1040, Houston, TX 77002 or at such other place and date as the parties mutually agree. The date on which the Closing occurs is referred to herein as the "Closing Date." 5.3 Closing Activities - The following actions shall take place at Closing: 5.3.1 Certificates - Each party shall deliver to the other party a certificate in a form satisfactory to the other party dated as of the Closing and executed by a duly authorized officer, partner, member, or owner, as appropriate, of such party to the effect that the party has all requisite corporate, partnership or other power and authority to purchase or sell the Assets, as the case may be, on the terms described in this Agreement and to perform its other obligations hereunder and that all corporate, partnership and/or other prerequisites of whatsoever nature have been fulfilled. 5.3.2 Assignment - Seller and Buyer shall execute an assignment substantially in the form as Exhibit D assigning the Assets to Buyer, as well as applicable governmental assignment forms (collectively the "Assignments") and deliver the Assignments to Buyer. 5.3.3 Payment - The Purchase Price as adjusted herein shall be paid as provided in Article 2.2. hereinabove. 5.3.4 Possession - Seller shall (subject to the terms of any applicable joint operating agreements and to the other provisions hereof) 15 deliver to Buyer possession of the Assets, to the extent that actual delivery of the assets is contemplated hereby. 5.3.5 Letters-in-Lieu - Seller shall prepare and Seller and Buyer shall execute and deliver to Buyer the Letters-in-Lieu of Transfer Orders and change of operator forms provided for in this Agreement covering the Assets. 5.4 Conditions to Closing 5.4.1 Seller's Conditions to Closing - The obligations of Seller to proceed with the Closing contemplated hereby are subject to the satisfaction on or prior to the Closing of all of the following conditions, any one or more of which may be waived, in whole or in part, in writing by Seller: (a) The representations and warranties made herein by Buyer shall be correct at and as of the Closing Date as though such representations and warranties were made at and as of the Closing Date, and Buyer shall have performed and satisfied the covenants and agreements required by this Agreement to be performed by Buyer at or prior to the Closing Date. 5.4.2 Buyer's Conditions to Closing - The obligations of Buyer to proceed with the Closing contemplated hereby are subject to the satisfaction on or prior to the Closing of all of the following conditions, any one or more of which may be waived, in whole or in part, in writing by Buyer: 16 (a) The representations and warranties made herein by Seller shall be correct at and as of the Closing Date as though such representations and warranties were made at and as of the Closing Date, and the factual matters contained in any representation and warranty made by Seller "to the best of Seller's knowledge," or similar language, shall be true and correct at and as of the Closing Date without regard to Seller's knowledge of same, and Seller shall have performed and satisfied all covenants required by this Agreement to be performed by Seller at or prior to the Closing Date. (b) The loan agreement and related promissory note and mortgage (the "Lending Transaction Documents") contemplated by the Letter of Intent dated January 24, 2001, as amended, between Seller and Buyer shall have been mutually agreed upon and the Lending Transaction Documents executed and delivered at the Closing, and all required third party consents and subordinations (including Seller's lending institution(s)) in connection with such Lending Transaction Documents shall be in forms satisfactory to Buyer and shall have been received by Buyer prior to or at the Closing. ARTICLE 6 6. ADDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS Seller and Buyer agree to the following additional obligations: 6.1 Recordation and Filing of Documents - After the Closing, Buyer shall file or record the Assignments, in the appropriate parish and governmental 17 records. Buyer shall provide a copy of same, including recording data, to Seller. 6.2 Records - Within ten (10) days of Buyer's written request (which request must be delivered to Seller no later than ninety (90) days after the Closing), Seller will furnish to Buyer, at Seller's sole cost, copies of any Records so requested. In the event Buyer fails to request copies of all or any portion of the Records prior to the expiration of such ninety (90) day period, Seller shall, for a period of six (6) years after the Closing, further make available to Buyer (at the location of such Records in Seller's organization) access to the Records during normal business hours, upon written request of Buyer, and Buyer shall have the right to copy at its own expense and retain such copies of the Records. If, however, Seller elects to destroy any of the Records prior to the expiration of the six (6) year period, Seller shall give to Buyer written notice of such intent at least thirty (30) days prior to such destruction, and Buyer shall have the option, at its expense, of having such Records delivered to it. 6.3 Final Settlement Statement - If a final settlement statement subsequent to Closing is necessary, Seller shall issue such statement (the "Final Settlement Statement") within ninety (90) days after Closing. Buyer shall respond with objections and proposed corrections within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the Final Settlement Statement. If Buyer does not respond with objections and the support therefor to the Final Settlement Statement in writing within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the Final 18 Settlement Statement, said Statement shall be deemed approved by Buyer. If Buyer responds with objections to the Final Settlement Statement within such thirty (30) day period and Buyer and Seller are unable to agree on a Final Settlement Statement within twenty (20) days of Buyer's response, such dispute shall be resolved pursuant to the procedures set forth in Article 21 hereof. Resolution of any dispute pursuant to Article 21, whether pursuant to negotiation or arbitration, shall include and provide for a Final Settlement Statement. After approval by both parties, the net adjustment due pursuant to the Final Settlement Statement for the Assets conveyed will be summarized and a net check or invoice will be sent to the Buyer. Buyer agrees to promptly pay any such invoice within ten (10) days after receipt by Buyer. 6.4 Further Assurances - Buyer and Seller further agree that each will, from time to time and upon reasonable request, execute, acknowledge, and deliver in proper form, any instrument of conveyance, assignment or transfer necessary to cause title in the Assets to be transferred to Buyer. ARTICLE 7 7. TAXES 7.1 Property Taxes - All ad valorem taxes, real property taxes, personal property taxes and similar obligations ("Real Property Taxes") applicable to the Assets with respect to the tax period in which the Effective Time occurs (the "Current Tax Period") shall be apportioned between Seller and Buyer as of the Effective Time based on the immediately preceding tax 19 period's assessment, regardless of the taxing agencies' basis for calculating such assessment, unless the Current Tax Period's assessment is known, in which case that assessment shall be used for apportionment. Seller will reimburse Buyer for Seller's portion for the Current Tax Period at Closing or in connection with any settlement provided for herein. Buyer shall pay, and defend and hold Seller harmless with respect to payment of all Real Property Taxes on the Properties for the Current Tax Period and thereafter, together with any interest or penalties assessed thereon. If Seller pays the Real Property Taxes assessed for the Current Tax Period, Buyer agrees to reimburse Seller for Buyer's portion of said taxes at Closing or in connection with any settlement provided for herein. 7.2 Production Taxes - All taxes (other than Real Property Taxes, income taxes, or similar taxes) imposed on or with respect to the production of oil, natural gas, or other hydrocarbons or minerals, or the receipt of proceeds therefrom (including but not limited to severance, production and excise taxes) shall be apportioned between the parties based upon the respective shares of production taken by the parties. Payment or withholding of all such taxes that have accrued prior to the Effective Time and filing of all statements, returns and documents pertinent thereto shall be the responsibility of Seller. Payment or withholding of all such taxes that have accrued from and after the Effective Time and the filing of all statements, returns and documents incident thereto shall be the responsibility of Buyer. 20 7.3 Other Taxes - As may be required by relevant taxing agencies, Seller shall collect and Buyer shall pay at Closing all applicable state and local sales tax, use tax, gross receipts tax, business license tax, and other taxes except taxes imposed by reason of income to Seller. The tax collected shall be based upon Buyer's valuation of the applicable Property as provided in Section 2.3. Any state or local tax specified above, inclusive of any penalty and interest, assessed at a future date against Seller with respect to the transaction covered herein shall be paid by Buyer or, if paid by Seller, Buyer shall promptly reimburse Seller therefor. Any documentary stamp tax which may be due shall be paid by Buyer. ARTICLE 8 8. OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTIES 8.1 Distribution of Production - All oil in storage above the pipeline connection or gas beyond the meters at the Effective Time shall be credited to Seller. Seller has gauged the oil in storage and read all gas meter charts at the Effective Time. Seller will endeavor to sell and deliver the quantity of such oil in storage as is credited to Seller prior to closing. For any such oil not sold as part of the closing settlement statement, the price for such oil in storage shall be at the price that Seller has contracted to sell the oil as of the Closing Date. If there is no such price, the price shall be the average of the two highest prices that are posted on the Closing Date (plus any premium) by other purchasing companies in the field or locality where the Properties are located for oil of like grade and 21 gravity. Title to the oil in storage as of the Effective Time that is unsold as of the Closing Date shall pass to Buyer as of the Closing Date, and an upward adjustment shall be made to the Purchase Price due at Closing. 8.2 Proration of Income and Expenses - Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all proceeds (including proceeds held in suspense or escrow), receipts, credits, and income attributable to the Properties for all periods of time prior to the Effective Time shall belong to Seller, and all proceeds, receipts, credits, and income attributable to the Properties for all periods of time from and after the Effective Time shall belong to Buyer. Seller shall be responsible for royalties, ad valorem, property, production, severance and similar taxes, and incurred operational costs and expenses attributable to the period prior to the Effective Time. Buyer shall otherwise assume all other obligations, duties, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses arising out of ownership or operation of the Assets, whether attributable to the period of time before or after the Effective Time, including plugging and abandonment of wells, abandonment of facilities, and environmental liabilities. 22 8.3 Notice to Remitters of Proceeds - Buyer is responsible for informing all purchasers of production or other remitters to pay Buyer and obtaining from the remitter(s) revenues accrued after the Effective Time. To the extent a remitter pays revenues to the incorrect party, that party shall promptly remit to the correct party such revenues. The remitter(s) shall be informed by Seller and Buyer via Letters-in-Lieu of Transfer Order or such other reasonable documents which remitter(s) may require. ARTICLE 9 9. SELLER-OPERATED ASSETS 9.1 Standard of Care - Seller shall operate the Assets using the same standard of care as a reasonably prudent Operator under the same or similar circumstances until Closing, or such later time as any applicable joint operating agreement may require. 9.2 Operations - During the period from the Execution Date to Closing, Seller shall (i) consult with Buyer with respect to all AFE's over Five Thousand Dollars (US $5,000) net to the interest of Seller which are received by Seller with respect to any Property (but Seller's only duty with respect to such AFE's is to discuss them with Buyer and consider Buyer's desire with respect thereto), and with respect to all material decisions to be made with respect to the Assets, including, without limitation, settlement of any gas imbalances and incurring of costs for discretionary expenditures for operations in excess of Five Thousand Dollars (US $5,000) net to the interest of Seller for which AFE's are not prepared; (ii) not transfer, sell, 23 hypothecate, encumber, abandon or otherwise dispose of any material portion of the Assets other than the sale of production in the ordinary course of business; (iii) not resign or otherwise voluntarily relinquish its rights as operator of any of the Assets for which it serves as operator on the date hereof; (iv) not grant any preferential right to purchase or similar right to agree to require the consent of any party to the transfer and assignment of the Assets to Buyer, subject to existing contractual obligations; (v) not enter into any gas sales contract or crude oil sales or supply contract with respect to the Assets which is not terminable without penalty upon notice of thirty (30) days or less; (vi) not enter into any transaction the effect of which would be to cause Seller's ownership interest in any of the Assets to be materially altered from its ownership interest as of the date hereof; (vii) give prompt written notice to Buyer of any notice of default (or written threat of default, whether disputed or denied) received or given by Seller under any instrument or agreement affecting the Assets to which Seller is a party or by which it or any of the Assets are bound; (viii) not propose, elect to participate or elect not to participate in any operations on the Assets estimated to exceed In Thousand Dollars (U.S. $10,000) net to the interest of Seller, without the advance written consent of Buyer, subject to Buyer receiving Seller's recommendation discussed below in this Section 10.2; and (ix) until Closing, maintain in full force and effect any current insurance covering claims relating to property damage and casualty loss affecting the Assets 24 occurring prior to Closing. Buyer shall provide its consent or non-consent within the earlier of three (3) days of the notice from Seller or such shorter period, if required, by the applicable operating agreement. Seller agrees to (A) provide Buyer all relevant information with respect to any such operations promptly upon receipt of such information, and (B) inform Buyer in writing of its recommendation to either participate or not participate in such operations prior to Buyer providing its consent or non-consent with respect to such proposed operations. At Closing, Buyer assumes all obligations with respect to its elections made hereunder. ARTICLE 10 10. RELATED AGREEMENTS, THIRD-PARTY NOTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL 10.1 Related Agreements The sale of the Assets is subject to any and all assignments, subleases, farmout agreements, joint operating agreements, letter agreements, easements, rights-of-way, and all other agreements with respect to or pertaining to the Assets to the extent that they are described in Exhibit A hereto and are binding on Seller. Except for the liabilities retained by Seller hereunder, Buyer further agrees to expressly assume the obligations and liabilities of Seller under such assignments, subleases, farmout agreements, joint operating agreements, letter agreements, easements, rights-of-way, and other agreements insofar as such obligations or liabilities concern or pertain to the Assets and to execute any documents necessary to effectuate such agreement. 25 10.2 Third Party Notifications and Approvals - The sale of the Assets may require the approval or consent of lessors, joint interest owners, farmors, sublessors, assignors, grantors, parties to agreements, or governmental bodies having jurisdiction. Seller assumes full responsibility for obtaining any such consent and approval, including, as necessary, obtaining waivers of maintenance of uniform interest provisions from joint interest owners, and furnishing Buyer with proof of such consent or approval. 10.3 Exchange Provision - Buyer has been advised, and understands, that Seller retains the option to effect a tax-free exchange of property of like kind pursuant to the provisions of Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Regulations"). Buyer agrees to cooperate with Seller in connection with such exchange (which may be a deferred exchange permitted under the Regulations). Buyer's cooperation shall include, but shall not be limited to, payment of the Purchase Price of the Assets to a qualified escrow account, a qualified trust or a qualified intermediary (as defined in the Regulations) and the execution of such documents as may reasonably be required in connection therewith. Buyer shall not be required, however, to incur additional costs or obligations in connection with such exchange, and Seller shall indemnify and hold harmless Buyer against, or reimburse Buyer for any claims, damages, liabilities, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) asserted against or incurred by Buyer in connection with or arising out of such exchange. 26 ARTICLE 11 11. INDEMNITY EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY RETAINED BY SELLER IN ARTICLE 3.4 AND 8.2, BUYER SHALL ASSUME ALL OBLIGATIONS AND LIABILITIES TO THE EXTENT RELATING TO THE ASSETS, [INCLUDING, BUT BY NO MEANS LIMITED TO, RECLAMATION AND PLUGGING AND ABANDONMENT OF THE WELLS, WHETHER NOW OR HEREAFTER LOCATED ON THE LEASES TO BE TRANSFERRED HEREUNDER OR LANDS POOLED OR UNITIZED THEREWITH. BUYER AGREES TO RELEASE, DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD SELLER, ITS AFFILIATED, PARENT AND SUBSIDIARY ENTITIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, SHAREHOLDERS, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND EMPLOYEES (COLLECTIVELY, "SELLER INDEMNITEES"), HARMLESS FROM ANY DAMAGES, EXPENSES (INCLUDING COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES), CIVIL FINES, PENALTIES, AND OTHER COSTS AND LIABILITIES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF CLAIMS, DEMANDS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION ASSERTED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE ASSETS, [INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY COSTS, EXPENSES, AND LIABILITIES WHATSOEVER ARISING OUT OF, OR IN CONNECTION WITH, THE PLUGGING AND ABANDONING OF ANY WELLS, REMOVAL OR MODIFICATION OF FACILITIES (INCLUDING PIPELINES), CLOSURE OF PITS, AND RESTORATION OF THE SURFACE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE 27 OBLIGATION TO PLUG, REMOVE, MODIFY, CLOSE, OR RESTORE AROSE PRIOR TO OR SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME.] BUYER'S INDEMNIFICATION OF SELLER INDEMNITEES SHALL EXTEND TO AND INCLUDE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, CLAIMS, CAUSES OF ACTION AND DEMANDS BASED ON (i) THE NEGLIGENCE OF SELLER, BUYER, OR THIRD PARTIES, WHETHER SUCH NEGLIGENCE IS ACTIVE OR PASSIVE, JOINT, CONCURRENT, OR SOLE, OR (ii) SELLER'S OR BUYER'S STRICT LIABILITY, OR (iii) OTHER FAULT OR RESPONSIBILITY OF SELLER. NOTWITHSTANDING THE ABOVE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 11 OR ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, BUYER'S INDEMNIFICATION OF SELLER SHALL NOT INCLUDE LOSSES SUSTAINED OR LIABILITIES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. ARTICLE 12 12. ENVIRONMENTAL 12.1 Material Adverse Environmental Conditions - During the Due Diligence Period, the Buyer shall have the right to make an environmental assessment of the Assets. If, during the Due Diligence Period, Buyer discovers a material and adverse environmental condition which it finds unacceptable ("Material Condition") Buyer shall immediately notify Seller of same and provide evidence thereof as soon as possible after discovering such Material Condition. For the purpose of this Section, a Material 28 Condition shall not include the reasonable costs of plugging, abandonment and restoration attributable to the Assets and shall be "material" and "adverse" only if (1) it involves damages to the occupant or other persons having rights in the surface or subsurface of the Assets or adjoining lands, waterways and aquifers and (2) the cost to remediate said conditions to levels required by applicable environmental laws or reasonably compensate the owner for damages to the surface or subsurface could reasonably be expected to exceed Five Thousand Dollars (US $5,000) per Property. Buyer and Seller shall treat all information regarding any conditions as confidential, whether Material Conditions or not, and shall not make any contact with any governmental authority or third party regarding same without written consent from the other party unless so required by applicable law. To the extent that the aggregate amount of all Material Conditions exceeds Fifty Thousand Dollars (US $50,000), Seller may either (1) remedy the Material Condition(s) to Buyer's reasonable satisfaction and at Seller's own cost and expense or (2) agree with Buyer on an adjustment to the Purchase Price, which adjustment shall reflect the cost to remediate such Material Condition(s), but only to the extent of remediation required by applicable federal, state or local law, or (3) remove that portion of the Properties from the Assets being conveyed and adjust the Purchase Price accordingly. If the total of all Purchase Price adjustments due to Material Conditions exceeds Five Hundred Thousand Dollars (US $500,000), Seller 29 or Buyer may cancel this Agreement and have no further obligations hereunder. 12.2 Environmental Indemnification - As to the Assets conveyed to Buyer at Closing, BUYER AGREES TO ACCEPT ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF THE ASSETS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL EXISTING AND PROSPECTIVE CLAIMS, CAUSES OF ACTION, FINES, LOSSES, COSTS AND EXPENSES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO COSTS TO CLEAN UP OR REMEDIATE, AND BUYER HEREBY AGREES TO RELEASE THE SELLER INDEMNITEES FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY THEREFOR AND AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD THE SELLER INDEMNITEES HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, CAUSES OF ACTION, FINES, INTEREST, PENALTIES, EXPENSES, COSTS, LOSSES, AND LIABILITIES WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS) IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION. ARTICLE 13 13. BUYER'S REPRESENTATIONS 13.1 Intent of Acquisition - Buyer hereby represents that if, in the future, it should sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of the Assets or fractional undivided interests therein, Buyer will do so in compliance with any applicable federal and state securities laws. 30 13.2 Information - Buyer represents that all information requested by Buyer has been made available, that Buyer has been supplied with all of the additional information concerning the Assets that Buyer deemed necessary or appropriate as a prudent and knowledgeable purchaser to evaluate the Assets purchased and has satisfied itself as to the correctness of all information relating to the Assets. Buyer represents that it has performed due diligence on the Assets and performed all necessary tasks involved in evaluating the Assets, to the Buyer's complete satisfaction. 13.3 Knowledge and Experience - Buyer represents that by reason of Buyer's knowledge and experience in the evaluation, acquisition, and operation of oil and gas properties. Buyer has evaluated the merits and risks of purchasing the Assets from Seller and has formed an opinion based solely upon Buyer's knowledge and experience. 13.4 Closing - The representations set forth in this Article 13 shall be deemed to have been made at and as of the Closing. ARTICLE 14 14. GAS IMBALANCES 14.1 Seller's and Buyer's Respective Obligations - For those Properties offered for sale which have cumulative gas imbalances, Seller represents, to the best of its knowledge, (and Buyer acknowledges) that any such imbalances as detailed in Exhibit E were based upon either operator statements or Seller estimates. Buyer has or will have performed its own due diligence inquiry into the cumulative gas imbalances to Buyer's own 31 satisfaction, has independently determined the actual cumulative gas balancing status of the Properties, and has made its decision to purchase the Assets solely in reliance upon Buyer's own investigation, subject only to the recourse provided for in this Article 14. Accordingly, from and after the Effective Time, any and all benefits, obligations, and liabilities associated with gas imbalances shall accrue to and be the responsibility of Buyer, irrespective of any subsequent discovery by either Buyer or Seller that the actual cumulative gas imbalance(s) relating to any of the Assets as of the Effective Time was other than that relied upon by either party in electing to purchase or sell. Buyer shall assume, indemnify and hold Seller harmless for Seller's actual overproduced or underproduced position in the Assets as of the Effective Time. 14.2 Adjustment to Purchase Price - If Seller or Buyer determines on or before the issuance of the Final Settlement Statement that the actual aggregate gas imbalance as of the Effective Time is different than the aggregate gas imbalance reported in Exhibit E, the Purchase Price shall be adjusted to compensate for the economic impact of the error or change. For the purposes of this Section only, the value of such gas imbalance adjustment shall be calculated at a price of $2.75 per net MCF. The Purchase price shall be reduced/increased by the adjustments for such gas imbalance changes at Closing for errors or changes discovered prior to Closing. Adjustments for errors or changes discovered after Closing but prior to the expiration of ninety (90) days after Closing shall be adjusted between the 32 parties in the Final Settlement Statement. Neither party shall have any recourse other than that provided for in this Article 14 against the other for any changes in gas balancing rights or obligations as of the Effective Time in respect of the Assets conveyed herein, whether known or unknown, discoverable or undiscoverable. ARTICLE 15 15. CASUALTIES LOSS If, prior to Closing, any of the Assets are substantially damaged or destroyed by fire, accident or other casualty ("Casualty Defect"), Seller shall notify Buyer promptly after Seller learns of such event. Seller shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure any such Casualty Defect by repairing such damage or, in the case of personal property or fixtures, replacing the damaged Assets with equivalent items, no later than the Closing. If any Casualty Defect exists at Closing, at Seller's option Buyer shall proceed to purchase the damaged interests, and the Purchase Price shall be reduced by the aggregate reduction in value of all affected Properties on account of such Casualty Defect. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Article 15, Seller shall be entitled to retain all insurance proceeds and claims against other parties relating to any such Casualty Defect. For purposes of this provision, normal wear and tear shall not be considered a Casualty Defect. 33 ARTICLE 16 16. AREA OF MUTUAL INTEREST Effective as of the Closing Date, Buyer and Seller establish an area of mutual interest ("AMI") covering the lands within the AMI boundaries shown on Exhibit G attached hereto. The term of the AMI ("AMI Term") shall be for a period expiring six (6) months after the termination of the last expiring leasehold interest created by the Leases subject to this Agreement. If during the AMI Term, either Buyer or Seller acquires any right, title or interest in, to or under any oil and gas lease, mineral interest, overriding royalty interest, net profits interest, production payment, royalty interest, or other interest in oil or gas (including farm-in agreements or similar contractual rights to acquire such interests) covering lands within the AMI (the "Acquired Interest"), then within thirty (30) days after such acquisition, the party making the acquisition (the "Offering Party") shall notify the other party (the "Responding Party") in writing of the acquisition. Notice of the acquisition shall include (i) copies of all executed assignments and agreements relating to the acquisition, (ii) such title information as the Offering Party has relating to the Acquired Interest, and (iii) an itemized statement of all lease bonuses, rentals and option payments and land-related and title review costs and expenses, including landman costs, brokerage fees and commissions, title examination fees and expenses, filing fees, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition of the Acquired Interest (the "Acquisition Costs"). The Responding Party shall have a period of fifteen (15) days (or, if a rig is on location, forty-eight (48) hours) after receipt of such notice 34 within which to elect in writing to acquire its proportionate share of the Acquired Interest and to pay its proportionate share of Acquisition Costs associated therewith. The Responding Party's failure to timely respond to the Acquiring Party's notice or to pay its proportionate share of Acquisition Costs shall be deemed an election not to acquire a proportionate share of the Acquired Interest. If the Acquired Interest covers lands that are partially within and partially outside the AMI, the Responding Party shall have the right to acquire its proportionate share of the Acquired Interest. If the Acquired Interest covers lands that are partially within and partially outside the AMI, the Responding Party shall have the right to acquire its proportionate share of the Acquired Interest insofar as it covers lands within the AMI, together with its proportionate share of that portion of the Acquired Interest covering lands outside the AMI. ARTICLE 17 17. BROKER'S AND FINDER'S FEES Buyer and Seller represent and warrant to each other that it has incurred no liability, contingent or otherwise, for broker's or finder's fees in respect of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby for which the other party shall have any responsibility whatsoever. ARTICLE 18 18. NOTICES All communications between Buyer and Seller required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing, and any communication or delivery hereunder shall be deemed to have been fully made if actually delivered, by facsimile 35 transmission, or if mailed by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the address as set forth below: SELLER BUYER ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Goodrich Petroleum Company, L.L.C. Malloy Energy Company, L.L.C. 815 Walker, Suite 1040 Bay Street on the Waterfront Houston, TX 77002 Sag Harbor, New York 11963 Attention: Robert C. Turnham, Jr Attention: Patrick E. Malloy, III. Tel: (713) 780-9494 Tel: (631) 725-4540 Fax: (713) 780-9254 Fax: (631) 725-0334 ARTICLE 19 19. DEFAULT If either party defaults in the performance of its obligations hereunder, the other party shall be entitled to enforce such obligation by a decree of specific performance or may pursue any other remedy permitted by law. ARTICLE 20 20. TERMINATION Buyer and Seller acknowledge and agree that, during the period prior to the Closing, Seller may negotiate, solicit or entertain any inquiries or proposals, or enter into any binding or non-binding agreement or understanding with any other party, with respect to any asset sale, asset transfer, acquisition, sale of equity interests, merger, consolidation, reorganization or other business combination involving either Seller or its assets or with respect to any other transaction which could have the effect of preventing, frustrating or interfering with the transaction contemplated by this Agreement (any of the above being a "Competing 36 Transaction"). Seller may, by written notice to Buyer, terminate this Agreement in order to pursue or consummate a Competing Transaction. In the event Seller terminates this Agreement in order to pursue or consummate a Competing Transaction, Seller will pay to Buyer liquidated damages in an amount equal to the greater of (i) One Million Eighty Thousand Dollars (US $1,080,000) or (b) nine percent (9%) of the fair market value of the consideration payable to Seller and/or its shareholders in connection with the Competing Transaction; provided, however, in no event shall such liquidated damages exceed One Million Two Hundred Thousand Dollars (US $1,200,000). Such liquidated damages shall be payable by Seller to Buyer in cash within five (5) business days of the termination of this Agreement by Seller. Seller and Buyer acknowledge and agree that the actual damages resulting from such termination of this Agreement would be difficult or impracticable to calculate and that, in light of the circumstances, the foregoing liquidated damages are not penalties but represent a reasonable approximation of Buyer's damages and will be Seller's sole liability and Buyer's exclusive remedy with respect to such termination. ARTICLE 21 21. ARBITRATION 21.1 Resolution of Disputes - Buyer and Seller agree to resolve any disputes under this Agreement pursuant to the negotiation and, if required, arbitration provisions set forth below. Any party may give the other party written notice of a dispute under this Agreement, which notice shall summarize the nature of the dispute and such party's position with respect 37 thereto (a "Dispute Notice"). The parties shall first attempt in good faith to resolve any dispute promptly by negotiation. If the dispute has not been resolved within thirty (30) days of the Dispute Notice, either party may initiate arbitration of the dispute as provided hereinafter. 21.2 Arbitration - Any dispute not resolved by negotiation shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the then current Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association by three independent and impartial arbitrators who have no financial interest in the dispute, one of whom shall be selected by Seller, one of whom shall be selected by Buyer, and the third of whom shall be selected by the arbitrators so chosen and who shall be the presiding arbitrator (the "Presiding Arbitrator"). If a party determines to submit a dispute for arbitration, such party shall furnish the other party with a dated, written statement (the "Arbitration Notice") indicating (i) such party's intent to commence arbitration proceedings, (ii) the nature, with reasonable detail, of the dispute and (iii) the remedy such party will seek. A copy of the Arbitration Notice shall be concurrently provided to the American Arbitration Association, along with a copy of this Agreement. The parties shall each have fifteen (15) business days following receipt by the American Arbitration Association of the Arbitration Notice to select their respective arbitrators. The arbitrators selected by the parties shall, within thirty (30) business days of their appointment, select the Presiding Arbitrator. In the event that they are unable or fail to do so or if one party fails or refuses to appoint its 38 party-appointed arbitrator, the chief judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas shall appoint an arbitrator satisfying the qualifications set forth above. All decisions and awards by the arbitration tribunal shall be made by majority vote. 21.3 Arbitration Procedures - Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing by the parties to the arbitration proceedings: (a) the arbitration proceedings shall be held in Houston, Texas; (b) the arbitrators shall be and remain at all times wholly independent and impartial; (c) the arbitration proceedings shall be conducted under the arbitration rules of, but not under the auspices of, the American Arbitration Association unless such rules are in conflict with the provisions of this Article 21 in which case the provisions of this Article 21 shall control; (d) any procedure issues not determined under the arbitral rules selected pursuant to clause (c) above shall be determined under the laws of the State of Texas, other than any law that would refer the matter to another jurisdiction; (e) the decision of the arbitrators shall be reduced to writing and shall be final and binding without the right of appeal; and (f) judgment on the arbitration award may be entered and enforced in any court having jurisdiction over the parties or their assets. 39 21.4 Other - It is the intent of the parties that the arbitration provisions hereof be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. The arbitrators may not award punitive damages, and the parties hereby irrevocably waive any claims to punitive damages. Each party shall be responsible for its own attorneys' fees in connection with the arbitration under this Article 21. All other costs of the arbitration proceedings shall be borne in the manner determined by the arbitrators. If an arbitrator should die, withdraw or otherwise become incapable of serving, or refuse to serve, a successor arbitrator shall be selected and appointed in the same manner as such arbitrator was selected within thirty (30) business days after the death, withdrawal or incapacity of such arbitrator is known to both parties. ARTICLE 22 22. MISCELLANEOUS 22.1 Entire Agreement - This Agreement and all Exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Any previous negotiations or communications between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof are merged herein. 22.2 Survival - This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the undersigned, their permitted successors, heirs, assigns and corporate successors and may be supplemented, altered, amended, modified, or revoked by writing only, signed by both parties. Except as 40 otherwise specifically provided herein, this Agreement and the covenants, promises, releases, disclaimers, waivers, indemnities, and continuing obligations shall survive Closing. 22.3 Choice of Law - THIS AGREEMENT AND ITS PERFORMANCE SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND GOVERNED BY, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. 22.4 Assignment - This Agreement and the rights and obligations under this Agreement may not be assigned by any party without the prior written consent of the other party, and any assignment made without such consent shall be void. 22.5 No Admissions - Neither this Agreement, nor any part hereof, nor any performance under this Agreement shall constitute or be construed as a finding, evidence of, or an admission or acknowledgment of any liability, fault, or past or present wrongdoing, or violation of any law, rule, regulation, or policy, by either Seller or Buyer or by their respective officers, directors, employees, or agents. 22.6 Third-Party Beneficiaries - Neither this Agreement or any performances hereunder by Seller or Buyer shall create any right, claim, cause of action, or remedy on behalf of any person not a party hereto. 22.7 Public Communications - After Closing, either party may make a press release or public communication concerning this transaction; provided, however, any such press release or public communication is subject to the 41 other party's prior review and approval, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. 22.8 Headings - The headings of the Articles and Sections of this Agreement are for guidance and convenience of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement. 22.9 Waiver - BUYER EXPRESSLY WAIVES THE PROVISIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES-CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OR ANY SIMILAR ACT UNDER ANY STATE OR FEDERAL LAW THAT GIVES CONSUMERS SPECIAL RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS. 22.10 Counterparts and Execution. - This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which when so executed, shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall be considered one and the same Agreement. Facsimile signatures may be treated as originals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above. SELLER BUYER GOODRICH PETROLEUM COMANY, L.L.C. MALLOY ENERGY COMPANY, L.L.C. By: /s/ Robert C. Turnham, Jr. By: /s/ Patrick E. Malloy, III. ----------------------------- ------------------------- Robert C. Turnham, Jr. Patrick E. Malloy, III. Chief Operating Officer President 42 EX-23 4 dex23.txt CONSENT OF KPMG LLP EXHIBIT 23 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT The Board of Directors Goodrich Petroleum Corporation: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-70840) on Form S-3 of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation of our report dated March 21, 2003 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities in 2001. KPMG LLP Shreveport, Louisiana March 26, 2003 EX-99.1 5 dex991.txt CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER EXHIBIT 99.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter G. Goodrich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations in the Company. /s/ Walter G. Goodrich ---------------------------------- Walter G. Goodrich Chief Executive Officer March 27, 2003 EX-99.2 6 dex992.txt CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER EXHIBIT 99.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, D. Hughes Watler, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations in the Company. /s/ D. Hughes Watler, Jr. --------------------------------- D. Hughes Watler, Jr. Chief Financial Officer March 27, 2003
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----