XML 42 R40.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Commitments Contingencies and Proposed Environmental Matters (Details Textual) (USD $)
1 Months Ended3 Months Ended9 Months Ended9 Months Ended1 Months Ended3 Months Ended9 Months Ended9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Dec. 31, 2011
MWh
Sep. 30, 2011
Sep. 30, 2010
Sep. 30, 2011
MWh
Ton
kV
mi
Sep. 30, 2010
Sep. 30, 2011
UNS GAS, INC. [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
UNS ELECTRIC, INC. [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
UNS ELECTRIC, INC. [Member]
Purchased Power [Member]
Dec. 31, 2008
TEP [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
TEP [Member]
Sep. 30, 2010
TEP [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
TEP [Member]
Sep. 30, 2010
TEP [Member]
Dec. 31, 2010
TEP [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
TEP [Member]
Purchased Power [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
TEP [Member]
Maximum [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
TEP [Member]
Minimum [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
TEP [Member]
TEP Contingencies [Member]
Sep. 30, 2011
Four Corner [Member]
Commitments and Contingencies (Textual) [Abstract]                    
2011        $ 1,000,000 $ 52,000,000 $ 52,000,000  $ 3,000,000    
2012      3,000,000 20,000,000 79,000,000 79,000,000  23,000,000    
2013      2,000,000 24,000,000 50,000,000 50,000,000  20,000,000    
2014      3,000,000 35,000,000 39,000,000 39,000,000  21,000,000    
2015        3,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000  12,000,000    
Thereafter        46,000,000 204,000,000 204,000,000  196,000,000    
Total        129,000,000 440,000,000 440,000,000  275,000,000    
Amount spent on acquired Land and development of headquarter59,000,000                   
Commitment Outstanding10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000               
Minimum Transport Quantity    2,400,000               
Commitment to purchase photovoltaic equipment having capacity    9               
Obligation to purchase percentage of output facility under renewable energy PPA       100.00%    100.00%       
Commitment to purchase photovoltaic equipment having MW capacity remain to ACC 6                  
Commitment to purchase photovoltaic equipment having MW capacity approved by ACC 3                  
Amount refunded by El Paso for transmission service to TEP         11,000,000          
TEP's rights for transmission before settlement of exchange agreement    200               
Rights for Transmission After Settlement of Exchange Agreement    170               
Transmission for the amount    30               
New firm transmission capacity    40               
Settlement amount to be paid by TEP to El Paso under Exchange Agreement            5,000,000       
Additional transmission expenses TEP would be allowed to recover from retail customers under the PPFAC mechanism          2,000,000         
Term of purchase agreement with Macho Springs facility            P20Y       
Pre tax gain to be recognized if settlement agreements are approved by FERC          7,000,000 7,000,000       
Net reduction to transmission expense            7,100,000       
Interest income                  900,000 
Interest Expense  28,105,00025,818,00083,230,00080,895,000    22,285,00020,154,00065,719,00063,732,000    600,000 
TEP's share of the reclamation costs at the expiration dates of coal supply agreement            26,000,000       
TEP's recorded obligation for final mine reclamation costs          13,000,000 13,000,000 11,000,000     
DC lawsuit seeking damages            600,000,000       
DC Lawsuit Seeking Punitive Damages            Not less than 1 billion       
Percentage of ownership of San Juan units 1 and 2    50.00%       7.50%       
Percentage of ownership in total generation capacity    20.00%               
Share of any resulting liabilities    7.00%               
Forecasted consumption levels    Eight and one-half months               
Term of advance notice for Lawsuit                   P60D
Approximate Mileage of Transmission line from Tucson to Nogales    60               
Transmission line approved by ACC, in KV    345               
TEP Capitalized Amount related to Nogales transmission line project          11,000,000 11,000,000 11,000,000     
Land and Land Rights Related to Nogales Transmission Line          2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000     
Estimated Capital cost for mercury emission control equipment for Springerville Units 1 and 23,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000               
Estimated Annual Operating Expenses for mercury emission control equipment for Springerville Units 1 and 2    5,000,000               
TEP's share of capital expenditures related to installation of SCRs at SJ                202,000,000155,000,000  
TEP's Share of the Estimated Capital Cost for Mercury Control Equipment for Navajo    Less than 1 million               
TEP's Estimated share of capital expenditure related to installation of SCRs for units 4 and 5            35,000,000       
TEP's estimated capital cost if SCR is required at Navajo            42,000,000       
TEP's capital expenditure related to installation of baghouses at Navajo            $ 43,000,000