XML 19 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)
9 Months Ended
Feb. 23, 2014
Share-based Compensation [Abstract]  
Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions
The weighted-average fair value of non-qualified stock options and the related assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model were as follows: 
 
Stock Options Granted
During the Nine Months Ended
 
February 23, 2014
 
February 24, 2013
Weighted-average fair value
$
12.05

 
$
12.22

Dividend yield
4.4
%
 
4.0
%
Expected volatility of stock
39.6
%
 
39.7
%
Risk-free interest rate
1.9
%
 
0.8
%
Expected option life (in years)
6.4

 
6.5

Summary Of Darden Stock Unit Activity
The following table presents a summary of our stock-based compensation activity for the nine months ended February 23, 2014: 
(in millions)
 
Stock
Options
 
Restricted
Stock/
Restricted
Stock
Units
 
Darden
Stock
Units
 
Performance
Stock Units
Outstanding beginning of period
 
11.6

 
0.2

 
2.2

 
0.9

Awards granted
 
1.7

 
0.1

 
0.6

 
0.3

Awards exercised
 
(1.4
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(0.2
)
Awards forfeited
 
(0.3
)
 

 
(0.2
)
 
(0.2
)
Outstanding end of period
 
11.6

 
0.2

 
2.2

 
0.8

Schedule of Compensation Cost for Share-based Payment Arrangements, Allocation of Share-based Compensation Costs by Plan
We recognized expense from stock-based compensation as follows: 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
(in millions)
 
February 23,
2014
 
February 24,
2013
 
February 23,
2014
 
February 24,
2013
Stock options (1)
 
$
4.0

 
$
4.7

 
$
16.5

 
$
14.2

Restricted stock/restricted stock units
 
(0.1
)
 
0.7

 
0.8

 
2.1

Darden stock units
 
3.6

 
1.7

 
14.6

 
12.2

Performance stock units
 
0.2

 
(0.4
)
 
4.5

 
4.8

Employee stock purchase plan
 
0.5

 
0.5

 
1.4

 
1.4

Director compensation program/other
 

 
0.1

 
1.7

 
1.3

Total stock-based compensation expense
 
$
8.2

 
$
7.3

 
$
39.5

 
$
36.0


(1)
The increase for the nine months ended February 23, 2014 is primarily attributable to the workforce reduction efforts further discussed in Note 11