XML 15 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

NOTE 3– Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments (all of which are held for nontrading purposes) for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Cash Held in Escrow

The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities

The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

Mortgage Notes Payable, Accrued Interest and Interest Rate Swap Agreement

 

The framework for measuring fair value provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

 

Level 1:       Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2:       Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3:       Unobservable inputs that reflect the Partnership's own assumptions.

The estimated fair value of mortgage notes payable has been determined using available market information or other appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Consequently, the estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized or would be paid in a current market exchange. The following are financial instruments for which the Partnership's estimate of fair value differs from the carrying amounts:

    At December 31, 2013 At March 31, 2013 
    Carrying     Carrying     
    Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value 
                
 LIABILITIES:             
 Mortgage notes  $ 16,522,071 $ 9,479,856 $ 18,102,636 $ 10,388,375 
                
                

For the mortgage notes, fair value is estimated using Level 3 inputs and calculated using present value cash flow models based on a discount rate. Centerline has not been active in the tender option bond market, through which these bonds have been securitized in the past. To assist in valuing these notes, the Partnership held separate discussions with various third party investment banks who are leaders in the municipal bond business. The discussions produced assumptions that were based on market conditions as well as the credit quality of the underlying property partnerships, which held the mortgage notes, to determine what discount rates to utilize.

Interest Rate Swap Agreement

For the interest rate swap, in the absence of readily determinable fair values, the fair value is estimated by the Partnership with the assistance of valuations obtained from the Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”), at which the swap transaction is held. The interest rate swap is valued based on the Bank's estimate of the net present value of the expected cash flows from each transaction subject to the interest rate swap using relevant mid-market data inputs and based on the assumption of no unusual market conditions or forced liquidation. The preceding method described may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although the Partnership believes its valuation method is appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

On August 24, 2010, GP Kaneohe Limited Partnership (“Kaneohe”), a subsidiary partnership, entered into an interest rate swap agreement with the Bank as a prerequisite for obtaining refinancing on its original mortgage note payable in the amount of $2,297,000. The agreement provides a fixed rate of interest on the notional amount, as provided in the agreement, in exchange for the variable rate. The swap contract became effective September 1, 2010. The following are the terms under the swap:

 Fixed swap – initial notional amount $ 3,050,000 
 Fixed swap – current notional amount   2,901,000 
 Fixed rate  4.65%
 Variable rate at September 30, 2013  3.75%
 Termination date  September 1, 2015 

Fair value for the interest rate swap is estimated using Level 2 inputs. At September 30, 2013, the fair value of the interest rate swap was approximately $44,000.

Derivative Instruments not meeting the criteria for hedge accounting (or for which an entity elects not to apply hedge accounting to the derivative in the event that the criteria are met) are recorded at fair value with any change in fair value reflected in the statement of operations in the period of change.

Due to General Partner and Affiliates and Due to/from Local General Partners and Affiliates

Management believes it is not practical to estimate the fair value of due to General Partner and affiliates and due to/from Local General Partners and affiliates because market information on such obligations is not currently available.