UNITED STATES

SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 4, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 0-26396

BENIHANA INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	65-0538630
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

8685 Northwest 53rd Terrace, Miami, Florida	33166
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:             (305) 593-0770

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

o	Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer
o	Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock $.10 par value, 5,612,139 shares outstanding at January 30, 2009

Class A common stock $.10 par value, 9,684,511 shares outstanding at January 30, 2009

Explanatory Note

Restatement

Benihana Inc. (the "Company") is filing this Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 4, 2009, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on February 13, 2009 (the "original filing") to reflect restatements of the condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and the notes related thereto. For a more detailed description of these restatements, see Note 2, Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements to the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Form 10-Q/A. Part I, Item 2, Managements's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Part I, Item 4, Controls and Procedures have also been amended to reflect the effects of the restatement.

For the convenience of the reader, this Form 10-Q/A sets forth the original filing in its entirety. However, this Form 10-Q/A only amends and restates Items 1, 2 and 4 of Part I and Item 6 of Part II of the original filing, in each case, solely as a result of, and to reflect, the restatement, and no other information in the original filing is amended hereby. The foregoing items have not been updated to reflect other events occurring after the original filing or to modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events. In addition, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, Item 6 of Part II of the original filing has been amended to contain currently dated certifications from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are attached to this Form 10-Q/A as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, respectively.

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE AND TEN PERIODS ENDED JANUARY 4, 2009 AND JANUARY 6, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			PAGE
PART I –	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements – unaudited
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) at January 4, 2009 (Restated) and March 30, 2008	2
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of (Loss) Income (unaudited) for the Three and Ten Periods Ended January 4, 2009 (Restated) and January 6, 2008	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (unaudited) for the Ten Periods Ended January 4, 2009 (Restated)	4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Ten Periods Ended January 4, 2009 (Restated) and January 6, 2008	5
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6 - 17
	Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18 - 33
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	33
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	34
PART II –	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	34 - 35
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	35
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	36
	Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	37

1

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – UNAUDITED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except share and per share information)

	January 4,			March 30,
	2009			2008
	(As restated, see Note 2)
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,931		$	1,718
Receivables, net		1,944			4,473
Inventories		6,901			6,477
Income tax receivable		610			3,756
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		4,045			2,036
Investment securities available for sale - restricted		632			808
Deferred income tax asset, net		894			347
Total current assets		16,957			19,615
Property and equipment, net		199,225			184,176
Goodwill		18,020			29,900
Deferred income tax asset, net		10,048			746
Other assets, net		8,644			7,217
Total assets	$	252,894		$	241,654
Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	6,228		$	6,158
Accrued expenses		30,795			25,226
Accrued put option liability		3,718			3,718
Total current liabilities		40,741			35,102
Deferred obligations under operating leases		12,563			11,296
Borrowings under line of credit		28,597			17,422
Other long term liabilities		343			769
Total liabilities		82,244			64,589
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 6 and 10)
Convertible preferred stock - $1.00 par value; authorized - 5,000,000 shares;
Series B mandatory redeemable convertible preferred stock - authorized - 800,000
shares; issued and outstanding – 800,000 shares, respectively, with a liquidation
preference of $20 million plus accrued and unpaid dividends as of January 4, 2009		19,515			19,449
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock - $.10 par value; convertible into Class A common
stock; authorized, 12,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding,
5,707,470 and 6,234,964 shares, respectively		571			623
Class A common stock - $.10 par value; authorized, 20,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding, 9,589,180 and 9,044,436 shares, respectively		959			905
Additional paid-in capital		69,078			68,342
Retained earnings		80,712			87,777
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(185	)		(31	)
Total stockholders’ equity		151,135			157,616
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity	$	252,894		$	241,654
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except per share information)

	Three Periods Ended					Ten Periods Ended
	January 4,			January 6,		January 4,			January 6,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
	(As restated, see Note 2)					(As restated, see Note 2)
Revenues
Restaurant sales	$	66,790		$	69,439	$	230,290		$	225,394
Franchise fees and royalties		424			375		1,364			1,324
Total revenues		67,214			69,814		231,654			226,718
Costs and Expenses
Cost of food and beverage sales		16,025			16,343		55,524			53,041
Restaurant operating expenses		41,271			41,428		143,911			134,693
Restaurant opening costs		755			1,227		1,738			2,688
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		6,049			6,208		20,572			21,274
Impairment charges		21,505			-		21,505			-
Total operating expenses		85,605			65,206		243,250			211,696
(Loss) income from operations		(18,391	)		4,608		(11,596	)		15,022
Interest (expense) income, net		(121	)		147		(511	)		258
(Loss) income before income taxes		(18,512	)		4,755		(12,107	)		15,280
Income tax (benefit) provision		(8,120	)		1,584		(5,878	)		5,394
Net (Loss) Income		(10,392	)		3,171		(6,229	)		9,886
Less: Accretion of preferred stock issuance costs and preferred stock dividends		251			250		836			834
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders	$	(10,643	)	$	2,921	$	(7,065	)	$	9,052
(Loss) Earnings Per Share
Basic (loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.70	)	$	0.19	$	(0.46	)	$	0.60
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.70	)	$	0.19	$	(0.46	)	$	0.58
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

Ten Periods Ended January 4, 2009

(In thousands, except share information)

											Accumulated
											Other
				Class A		Additional					Comprehensive			Total
	Common			Common		Paid-in		Retained			Loss,			Stockholders’
	Stock			Stock		Capital		Earnings			Net of Tax			Equity
Balance, March 30, 2008	$	623		$	905	$	68,342	$	87,777		$	(31	)	$	157,616
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss									(6,229	)					(6,229	)
Change in unrealized loss on
investment securities available for sale, net of tax												(154	)		(154	)
Total comprehensive loss															(6,383	)
Issuance of 5,750 shares of
common stock and 11,500
shares of Class A common stock from exercise of options		1			1		76								78
Conversion of 533,244 shares of
common stock into 533,244 shares of Class A common stock		(53	)		53										-
Dividends declared on Series B
preferred stock									(770	)					(770	)
Accretion of issuance costs on
Series B preferred stock									(66	)					(66	)
Stock based compensation							642								642
Tax benefit from stock option
exercises							18								18
Balance, January 4, 2009 (As restated, see Note 2)	$	571		$	959	$	69,078	$	80,712		$	(185	)	$	151,135
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

	Ten Periods Ended
	January 4,			January 6,
	2009			2008
	(As restated, see Note 2)
Operating Activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(6,229	)	$	9,886
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		14,097			13,070
Non-cash impairment charges		21,505			-
Stock-based compensation		642			481
Tax benefit from stock option exercises		(18	)		(1,325	)
Loss on disposal of assets		14			679
Deferred income taxes		(9,744	)		(1,618	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities that provided (used) cash:
Receivables		1,160			(1,514	)
Inventories		(424	)		(237	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,866	)		(721	)
Income taxes and other long term liabilities		2,738			1,507
Other assets		(1,791	)		(994	)
Accounts payable		777			757
Accrued expenses and deferred obligations under operating leases		7,566			5,176
Net cash provided by operating activities		28,427			25,147
Investing Activities:
Expenditures for property and equipment		(40,792	)		(41,787	)
Collection of insurance proceeds		1,912			-
Proceeds on sale of collateral underlying Monterey promissory note		373			-
(Purchase) sale of investment securities, available for sale, net		(83	)		7
Cash proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		-			6
Collection on Sushi Doraku note		-			2
Net cash used in investing activities		(38,590	)		(41,772	)
Financing Activities:
Borrowings on line of credit		84,515			41,885
Repayments on line of credit		(73,340	)		(34,954	)
Debt issuance costs		(143	)		-
Dividends paid on Series B preferred stock		(752	)		(748	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and Class A common stock upon exercise
of stock options		78			2,625
Tax benefit from stock option exercises		18			1,325
Cash dividend paid in lieu of fractional shares on stock split		-			(4	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		10,376			10,129
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		213			(6,496	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,718			8,449
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,931		$	1,953
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the ten periods:
Interest	$	657		$	232
Income taxes		1,127			5,505
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Acquired property and equipment for which cash payments had not yet been made	$	3,963		$	5,467
Accrued but unpaid dividends on the Series B preferred stock		263			268
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities available for sale, net of tax		(154	)		16
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. General

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 30, 2008, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009 have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnotes normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto for the year ended March 30, 2008 appearing in the Benihana Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9.6 million ($5.7 million after-tax) associated with the evaluation of its long-lived assets and an impairment charge of $11.9 million ($7.0 million after-tax) associated with the evaluation of its goodwill. See Note 2, Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements, and Note 12, Impairment Charges, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for more information.

These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and results of operations. The results of operations for the ten periods (forty weeks) ended January 4, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The Company has a 52/53-week fiscal year. The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday occurring within the dates of March 26 and April 1. The Company divides the fiscal year into 13 four-week periods where the first fiscal quarter consists of 4 periods totaling 16 weeks and each of the remaining three quarters consist of 3 periods totaling 12 weeks each.  In the event of a 53-week year, the additional week is included in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.  This operating calendar provides for a consistent number of operating days within each period, as well as ensures that certain holidays significant to the Company occur consistently within the same fiscal quarters.  Because of the differences in length of fiscal quarters, however, results of operations between the first quarter and the later quarters of a fiscal year are not comparable.  Fiscal year 2009 will end on March 29, 2009 and fiscal year 2008 ended on March 30, 2008, where both fiscal years consist of 52 weeks each.

2. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

Subsequent to the issuance of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company determined that those condensed consolidated financial statements contained a computational error related to the application of step one of the goodwill impairment test in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). This required the Company to perform step two of the goodwill impairment test for the RA Sushi reporting unit, which indicated that all of the goodwill allocated to that reporting unit was impaired. As a result, the Company has restated its unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009 included herein (the "restatement"). For further discussion, see Note 12, Impairment Charges, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet impact of the restatement as of January 4, 2009 is an increase in income tax receivable of $0.6 million, a decrease in goodwill of $11.9 million, an increase in the long term net deferred income tax asset of $4.9 million and a decrease in retained earnings of $6.4 million for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009. The decrease in retained earnings is comprised of a goodwill impairment charge of $11.9 million and an increase in the income tax benefit of $5.5 million. A deferred tax asset was recognized due to the deductibility of the related goodwill for tax purposes. The restatement decreased reported basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.42 for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009. The restatement also had an impact on previously reported cash flows within the cash provided by operating activities section of the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows; however, did not change net cash provided by operating activities. Net income decreased $6.4 million to a $6.2 million net loss, non-cash impairment charges increased $11.9 million to $21.5 million, income tax benefit increased $4.9 million to $9.7 million and income taxes and other liabilities decreased $0.6 million to $2.7 million for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009 included in this Form 10-Q/A have been restated to reflect the adjustments described above. The following is a summary of the impact of the restatement as of and for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009:

6

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

	January 4, 2009
Condensed consolidated balance sheet	(As previously reported)		Adjustments		January 4, 2009 (As restated)
Income tax receivable	$	13	$	597	$	610
Total current assets		16,300		597		16,597

Goodwill	29,900	(11,880	)	18,020
Deferred income tax asset, net	5,188	4,860		10,048

Total assets		259,317			(6,423	)		252,894
Retained earnings		87,135			(6,423	)		80,712
Total stockholders' equity		157,558			(6,423	)		151,135
Total liabilities, preferred stock and stockholders' equity		259,317			(6,423	)		252,894
	Three periods ended
	January 4, 2009
Condensed consolidated statement of (loss) income	(As previously reported)			Adjustments			January 4, 2009 (As restated)
Impairment charges	$	9,625		$	11,880		$	21,505
Total operating expenses		73,725			11,880			85,605
Loss from operations		(6,511	)		(11,880	)		(18,391	)
Loss before income taxes		(6,632	)		(11,880	)		(18,512	)
Income tax benefit		(2,663	)		(5,457	)		(8,120	)
Net loss		(3,969	)		(6,423	)		(10,392	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders		(4,220	)		(6,423	)		(10,643	)
Basic loss per share		(0.28	)		(0.42	)		(0.70	)
Diluted loss per share		(0.28	)		(0.42	)		(0.70	)
	Ten periods ended
	January 4, 2009
Condensed consolidated statement of (loss) income	(As previously reported)			Adjustments			January 4, 2009 (As restated)
Impairment charges	$	9,625		$	11,880		$	21,505
Total operating expenses		231,370			11,880			243,250
Income (loss) from operations		284			(11,880	)		(11,596	)
Loss before income taxes		(227	)		(11,880	)		(12,107	)
Income tax benefit		(421	)		(5,457	)		(5,878	)
Net income (loss)		194			(6,423	)		(6,229	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders		(642	)		(6,423	)		(7,065	)
Basic loss per share		(0.04	)		(0.42	)		(0.46	)
Diluted loss per share		(0.04	)		(0.42	)		(0.46	)

7

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

	Ten periods ended
	January 4, 2009
Condensed consolidated statement of stockholders' equity	(As previously reported)			Adjustments			January 4, 2009 (As restated)
Net income (loss)	$	194		$	(6,423	)	$	(6,229	)
Total comprehensive income (loss)		40			(6,423	)		(6,383	)
Total retained earnings		87,135			(6,423	)		80,712
Total stockholders' equity		157,558			(6,423	)		151,135
	Ten periods ended
	January 4, 2009
Condensed consolidated statement of cash flows	(As previously reported)			Adjustments			January 4, 2009 (As restated)
Net income (loss)	$	194		$	(6,423	)	$	(6,229	)
Non-cash impairment charges		9,625			11,880			21,505
Deferred income taxes		(4,884	)		(4,860	)		(9,744	)
Income taxes and other long term liabilities		3,335			(597	)		2,738

3. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”).  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value measures required under other accounting pronouncements but does not change existingguidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value.  SFAS 157 is effective for financial assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB amended SFAS 157 by issuing FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13,” which states that SFAS 157 does not address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement. In February 2008, the FASB also issued FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, for non-financial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis.

The Company’s adoption of the provisions of SFAS 157 on March 31, 2008, with respect to financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, did not have a material impact on its fair value measurements or its unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009. In accordance with FSP FAS 157-2, the Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of applying the provisions of SFAS 157 to its non-financial assets and liabilities beginning in fiscal 2010, including (but not limited to) the valuation of its reporting units for the purpose of assessing goodwill impairment and the valuation of property and equipment and other long-term assets when assessing long-lived asset impairment.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides reporting entities an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159 establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. The standard also requires additional information to aid financial statement users' understanding of a reporting entity's choice to use fair value on its earnings and also requires entities to display the fair value of those affected assets and liabilities in the primary financial statements. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity's first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Application of the standard is optional and any impacts are limited to those financial assets and liabilities to which SFAS 159 would be applied. The Company adopted SFAS 159 effective March 31, 2008 and has elected not to measure any of its current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption.

8

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R  establishes the principles and requirements on how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141R also requires certain disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination will generally be expensed as incurred. SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption of SFAS 141R is not permitted. Acquisitions, if any, after the effective date will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 141R.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component of equity, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions and any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is to be applied prospectively to business combinations consummated on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008. Acquisitions, if any, after the effective date will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 160.

4. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

	January 4,		March 30,
	2009		2008
Food and beverage	$	2,774	$	2,511
Supplies		4,127		3,966
	$	6,901	$	6,477

5. Fair Value of Investments

On March 31, 2008, the Company partially adopted SFAS 157 as a result of applying the deferral provisions of FSP FAS 157-2. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset and liability.  As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  

As of January 4, 2009, the Company has certain available for sale investment securities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company determined the fair value of its investment securities available for sale using quoted market prices (Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy).   The fair value of these investments, reflected in the unaudited interim condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 4, 2009, is $0.6 million. Financial market conditions have been extremely volatile in the second half of calendar year 2008 and valuations have declined as compared to the period ended March 30, 2008, including the Company’s available for sale investments. The Company does not have any other fair value measurements under SFAS 157 as of January 4, 2009.

9

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

6. Long-Term Debt

The Company had available up to $75 million from Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”) under the terms of a line of credit entered on March 15, 2007. The line of credit facility allowed the Company to borrow up to $75 million through March 15, 2012 and was secured by the assets of the Company. There were no scheduled payments prior to maturity; however, the Company could prepay outstanding borrowings prior to that date. The Company had the option to pay interest at Wachovia’s prime rate plus an applicable margin or at the London interbank offering rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin.  The interest rate varied depending upon the ratio of the sum of the Company’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined in the agreement, to its indebtedness. The Company also incurred a commitment fee on the unused balance available under the terms of the line of credit, based on a leverage ratio. While providing for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes, the line of credit agreement required that the Company maintain certain financial ratios and profitability amounts and restricted the payment of cash dividends as well as the use of proceeds to purchase stock of the Company.

On November 19, 2008, the Company and Wachovia entered into a Second Amendment to the line of credit facility (“the Amendment”), which amends the line of credit agreement dated March 15, 2007. The Amendment reduces the revolving commitment under the credit agreement from $75 million to $60 million, provided that $10 million of such commitment is subject to Wachovia’s successfully syndicating a portion of the loan or the Company attaining a leverage ratio of less than 3.5 to 1.0 for two consecutive fiscal quarters. The Amendment also permits the Company to further increase the commitment under the credit agreement up to an additional $15 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. For an interim period, the Amendment both decreases the fixed charge coverage ratio and increases the leverage ratio, which the Company is required to maintain under the credit agreement. The Amendment provides for a commitment fee of 0.3% on the unused portion of the loan commitment. Interest rates payable under the amended credit agreement vary depending on the Company’s leverage ratio and range from 1.25% to 3.50% above the applicable LIBOR rate or, at the Company’s option, from 0.0% to 2.0% above the applicable interest rate.

At January 4, 2009, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants of the credit agreement with Wachovia.

At January 4, 2009, the Company had $28.6 million outstanding under the amended line of credit facility with Wachovia at an interest rate of 2.2%.  The amount available to be borrowed under the line of credit is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the cumulative amount of any outstanding letters of credit, which totaled $0.5 million at January 4, 2009. Accordingly, at January 4, 2009, the Company has available $20.9 million for borrowing, with an additional $10 million available under certain terms and conditions under the line of credit facility.

See Note 15, Subsequent Events, for a discussion of the Third Amendment to the line of credit facility, entered into on February 9, 2009.

7. Income Taxes

The Company files income tax returns which are periodically audited by various federal and state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal and state income tax examinations for years prior to fiscal year 2006. During the three periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $0.4 million related to the resolution of uncertain tax positions previously recognized upon the adoption of FASB Financial Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). As of January 4, 2009, the Company had $0.3 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would impact the tax rate if recognized, and less than $0.1 million accrued for the payment of interest. Of the total unrecognized tax benefits at January 4, 2009, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that this amount could be reduced by $0.1 million in the next twelve months due the expiration of statute of limitations. Unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties are generally classified as other long term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. It is the Company’s continuing policy to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

10

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

8. (Loss) Earnings Per Share

Basic (loss) earnings per common share is computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  The diluted (loss) earnings per common share computation includes dilutive common share equivalents issued under the Company’s various stock option plans and conversion rights of Series B preferred stock.

The components used in the computation of basic (loss) earnings per share and diluted (loss) earnings per share for each fiscal year are shown below (in thousands):

	Three Periods Ended					Ten Periods Ended
	January 4,			January 6,		January 4,			January 6,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Net (loss) income, as reported	$	(10,392	)	$	3,171	$	(6,229	)	$	9,886
Less:  Accretion of preferred stock issuance costs and
preferred stock dividends		251			250		836			834
(Loss) income for computation of basic (loss)
earnings per common share		(10,643	)		2,921		(7,065	)		9,052
Add:  Accretion of preferred stock issuance costs and
preferred stock dividends		-			250		-			834
(Loss) income for computation of diluted
(loss) earnings per common share	$	(10,643	)	$	3,171	$	(7,065	)	$	9,886

	Three Periods Ended				Ten Periods Ended
	January 4,		January 6,		January 4,		January 6,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Weighted average number of common shares
used in basic (loss) earnings per share		15,297		15,252		15,288		15,147
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options		-		278		-		387
Series B preferred stock		-		1,600		-		1,600
Weighted average number of common shares
and dilutive potential common stock used in
diluted (loss) earnings per share		15,297		17,130		15,288		17,134

Stock options to purchase approximately 1.6 million shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted (loss) earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009. For the three and ten periods ended January 6, 2008, stock options to purchase approximately 0.3 million shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted (loss) earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive effect.

In accordance with SFAS 128, “Earnings per Share,” convertible preferred stock shall be assumed to have been converted at the beginning of the period and the resulting common shares shall be included in the denominator of diluted EPS. In applying the if-converted method, conversion shall not be assumed for purposes of computing diluted EPS if the effect would be anti-dilutive. Convertible preferred stock is anti-dilutive whenever the amount of the dividend declared in or accumulated for the current period per common share obtainable upon conversion exceeds basic EPS. For the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009, the dividend declared per common share obtainable upon conversion of the Series B preferred stock exceeds basic EPS.

11

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

9. Stock-Based Compensation

The number of shares of Class A common stock available for grant under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan is 750,000, of which a maximum of 550,000 may be issued upon the exercise of incentive stock options. As of January 4, 2009, of these amounts, the Company has granted 25,900 shares of restricted Class A common stock and options to purchase 413,400 shares of Class A common stock, leaving 310,700 shares available for future grants.

The Company recorded $0.2 million (approximately $0.1 million, net of tax) and $0.6 million (approximately $0.4 million, net of tax) in stock compensation expense during the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009, respectively. The Company recorded $0.2 million (approximately $0.1 million, net of tax) and $0.5 million (approximately $0.3 million, net of tax) in stock compensation expense during the three and ten periods ended January 6, 2008, respectively.

Stock Options

Options to purchase 100,000 and 70,000 shares of Class A common stock were granted during the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, respectively, and the following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model used in valuing options granted:

	Fiscal Year
	2009			2008
Risk free interest rate		3.4% - 3.7	%		3.4	%
Expected term	3 years			3 years
Expected dividend yield		-			-
Expected volatility		51.0% - 65.4	%		46.0	%

The following is a summary of stock option activity for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009:

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
				Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Life		Value
Outstanding at March 30, 2008		1,529,338		$	9.90		5.2	$	3,612,000
Granted		100,000			4.36
Canceled/Expired		(1,725	)		7.84
Exercised		(17,250	)		4.43
Outstanding at January 4, 2009		1,610,363		$	9.61		4.3	$	-
Exercisable at January 4, 2009		1,243,630		$	9.76		3.4	$	-

The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.  For the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was less than $0.1 million and $4.0 million, respectively.  Proceeds from stock options exercised during the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008 totaled less than $0.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively.  Upon the exercise of stock options, shares are issued from new issuances of stock. The tax benefit realized for tax deductions from stock options exercised during the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008 totaled less than $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively.  As of January 4, 2009, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation totaled $1.0 million and is expected to be recognized over approximately 2.5 years.

12

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Restricted stock

In fiscal 2008, the Company granted 25,900 shares of restricted Class A common stock awards to certain employees, and as of January 4, 2009, none of these awards were vested or forfeited. The grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted was $10.35 in fiscal year 2008, which was the market price of the underlying shares on the date of grant. As of January 4, 2009, there was $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over approximately 2.2 years.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Haru Minority Interest

In December 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of 80% of the equity of Haru Holding Corp. ("Haru"). The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, at any time during the period from July 1, 2005 through September 30, 2005, the holders of the balance of Haru's equity (the “Minority Stockholders”) had a one-time option to sell their remaining shares to the Company (the "put option").  The exercise price under the put option was to be calculated as four and one-half (4½) times Haru's consolidated cash flow for the fiscal year ended March 27, 2005 less the amount of Haru's debt (as that term is defined in the purchase agreement) at the date of the computation. On July 1, 2005, the Minority Stockholders exercised the put option, and the Company acquired the remaining 20% of the equity of Haru.

The Company believes that the proper application of the put option price formula would result in a payment to the former Minority Stockholders of approximately $3.7 million. The Company has offered to pay such amount to the former Minority Stockholders and recorded a $3.7 million liability with respect thereto.

On August 25, 2006, the former Minority Stockholders sued the Company. The suit (which was originally filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, but has been removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York) seeks an award of $10.7 million based on the former Minority Stockholders’ own calculation of the put option price formula and actions allegedly taken by the Company to reduce the value of the put option.

On December 19, 2007, the Court dismissed all of the claims against the Company, except for the breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract claims. On January 25, 2008, the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Amended Complaint. The parties have completed fact and expert discovery. The Court has set a dispositive motion filing deadline of March 2, 2009, and all parties have indicated they will be filing such motions. On December 22, 2008, the Court entered an order referring the case for a settlement conference, which will take place on March 12, 2009.

The Company believes that it has correctly calculated the put option price and that the claims of the former Minority Stockholders are without merit. However, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of this litigation.

Other Litigation

On May 17, 2007, Benihana Monterey Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company, filed a complaint in the action, Benihana Monterey Corporation v. Nara Benihana Monterey, Inc., et al. The action was commenced against various defendants in connection with a default on a Promissory Note in the amount of $0.4 million signed by one of the Company’s franchisees and a Personal Guaranty signed by the owner of such franchise.  The Company has obtained judgment against the defendant for approximately $0.5 million, including repayment of the $0.4 million Promissory Note, interest and costs. The Company has served the defendant with an order regarding examination of the defendant’s assets and has filed a subpoena requiring the defendant and the defendant’s entities to produce substantial documents.  During fiscal year 2008, the Company recorded a $0.4 million reserve for the estimated portion of the Promissory Note and accrued interest that would not be collectible. On December 4, 2008, the Company entered into a franchise agreement with a third-party for the operation of the Monterey location and, concurrently, entered into an agreement for the sale of the Monterey location’s assets, which had collateralized the Promissory Note. The proceeds from the sale of assets resulted in a partial recovery of approximately $0.4 million of the Promissory Note, accrued interests and costs. The remaining balance of the Promissory Note and accrued interest is not probable of being collected and was written off during the three periods ended January 4, 2009.

13

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The Company is not subject to any other pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine claims incidental to its business, which the Company does not believe will materially impact results of operations.

Supply Agreements

The Company has entered into non-cancellable supply agreements for the purchase of beef and certain seafood items, in the normal course of business, at fixed prices for periods up to twelve months. These supply agreements will eliminate volatility in the cost of the commodities over the terms of the agreements. These supply agreements are not considered derivative contracts.

11. Restaurant Operating Expenses

Restaurant operating expenses consist of the following (in thousands):

	Three Periods Ended				Ten Periods Ended
	January 4,		January 6,		January 4,		January 6,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Labor and related costs	$	22,595	$	23,673	$	80,240	$	76,460
Restaurant supplies		1,564		1,630		5,543		5,167
Credit card discounts		1,290		1,354		4,428		4,281
Utilities		1,919		1,726		7,118		5,918
Occupancy costs		4,436		4,024		14,659		13,384
Depreciation and amortization		4,138		3,739		13,739		12,477
Other restaurant operating expenses		5,329		5,282		18,184		17,006
Total restaurant operating expenses	$	41,271	$	41,428	$	143,911	$	134,693

12. Impairment Charges

Long-lived assets

The Company periodically assesses the potential impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.  The Company considers a history of consistent and significant negative comparable restaurant sales, declining operating profit, or operating losses to be primary indicators of potential asset impairment, after an individual restaurant location has been operating for two years.

During the three periods ended January 4, 2009, as a result of a prolonged economic downturn and its resulting impact on the Company’s expectation of future cash flows, the Company determined that a change in circumstances had occurred and the carrying value of certain of its property and equipment may not be recoverable. Accordingly, the Company performed an analysis of the carrying value of its property and equipment.

Assets are grouped and evaluated for impairment at the lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows, primarily at the individual restaurant level.  When indicators of potential impairment are present, the carrying values of the assets are evaluated in relation to the operating performance and estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying restaurant. If a forecast of undiscounted future operating cash flows directly related to the restaurant is less than the carrying amount of the restaurant’s long-lived assets, the carrying amount is compared to fair value.  An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the restaurant’s long-lived assets exceeds its fair value, and the charge is taken against results of operations. Fair value is an estimate based on a net present value model, which discounts projected free cash flows at a computed weighted average cost of capital as the discount rate. The projected free cash flows used in calculating estimated fair value involve a significant amount of management judgment and include management’s best estimates of expected future comparable sales and operating performance for each restaurant.

14

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The results of the Company’s analysis indicated that the property and equipment were impaired at five restaurants:  Benihana Tucson, RA Sushi Corona, RA Sushi Glenview, RA Sushi Palm Beach Gardens and Haru Philadelphia. Accordingly, the Company took an impairment charge of $9.6 million ($5.7 million after-tax) to write-down the restaurants’ property and equipment to estimated fair value, all of which is classified as impairment charges in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of (loss) income.

Goodwill

Additionally, the Company reviews goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment during the third quarter, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process.  The first step is a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit is greater than its fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist, and the second step must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The purpose of the second step is only to determine the amount of goodwill that should be recorded on the balance sheet. The Company evaluated goodwill as of the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 at the reporting unit level using an estimation of fair value based upon (1) an analysis of discounted cash flow projections (income approach) and (2) an analysis of cash flows of the reporting unit using market-derived earnings multiples of similar restaurant businesses that were bought and sold within a reasonable time frame to the Company’s evaluation (market approach).

Based on the results of step one of the impairment tests, the Benihana and Haru reporting units’ estimated fair values exceeded their carrying values. No impairment charges to goodwill for these reporting units were recognized. Based on the results of step one of the impairment test, the RA Sushi reporting unit’s estimated fair value did not exceed its carrying value, which required the Company to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test. The second step involves an analysis reflecting the allocation of the fair value determined in the first step (as if it was the purchase price in a business combination). The recorded amounts of other items on the balance sheet are not adjusted. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. The second step of the goodwill impairment test indicated that all of the goodwill allocated to the RA Sushi reporting unit was impaired primarily due to depressed economic and industry factors at the valuation date and the step two purchase price allocation where a considerable amount of the RA Sushi reporting unit’s fair value was allocated to the RA Sushi trade name. Therefore, we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $11.9 million ($7.0 million after-tax) all of which is classified as impairment charges in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of (loss) income.

The Company will continue to monitor events in future periods to determine if additional impairment testing is warranted.

13. Segment Reporting

The Company’s reportable segments are those that are based on the Company’s methods of internal reporting and management structure. The Company manages operations by restaurant concept.

Revenues for each of the segments consist of restaurant sales. Franchise revenues, while generated from Benihana franchises, have not been allocated to the Benihana teppanyaki segment.  Franchise revenues are reflected as corporate revenues.

15

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The tables below present information about reportable segments (in thousands):

	Three Periods Ended
	January 4, 2009
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi			Haru			Corporate			Consolidated
Revenues	$	45,994	$	13,271		$	7,525		$	424		$	67,214
Impairment charges		1,370		16,555			3,580			-			21,505
Income (loss) from operations		3,810		(16,711	)		(3,003	)		(2,487	)		(18,391	)
Capital expenditures, net of insurance proceeds		11,181		1,295			36			-			12,512
	Three Periods Ended
	January 6, 2008
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi			Haru			Corporate			Consolidated
Revenues	$	51,666	$	9,731		$	8,042		$	375		$	69,814
Impairment charges		-		-			-			-			-
Income (loss) from operations		7,032		(345	)		664			(2,743	)		4,608
Capital expenditures		6,077		2,638			2,506			-			11,221
	Ten Periods Ended
	January 4, 2009
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi			Haru			Corporate			Consolidated
Revenues	$	156,640	$	45,494		$	28,156		$	1,364		$	231,654
Impairment charges		1,370		16,555			3,580			-			21,505
Income (loss) from operations		13,495		(16,181	)		(665	)		(8,245	)		(11,596	)
Capital expenditures, net of insurance proceeds		29,016		9,532			332			-			38,880
	Ten Periods Ended
	January 6, 2008
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi			Haru			Corporate			Consolidated
Revenues	$	166,151	$	33,287		$	25,956		$	1,324		$	226,718
Impairment charges		-		-			-			-			-
Income (loss) from operations		20,297		746			3,432			(9,453	)		15,022
Capital expenditures		25,621		6,530			9,636			-			41,787

14. 401K Plan

The Company adopted the Benihana 401K Plan (“the 401K Plan”) effective June 23, 2008. All eligible employees, as determined in accordance with Internal Revenue Service guidelines, who are at least age twenty-one or older can participate in the 401K Plan upon completion of one year of employment with the Company. The 401K Plan permits employees to elect to contribute a portion of their eligible compensation into the 401K Plan. The Company’s matching contributions under the 401K Plan are discretionary and are calculated as a percentage of eligible employee elective salary deferrals. These matching contributions have a six year graded vesting schedule. For the ten periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company accrued employer matching contributions to the 401K Plan of $0.1 million.

16

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

15. Subsequent Events

Resignation of the Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

On February 9, 2009, Joel A. Schwartz resigned from his positions as Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective February 9, 2009.  In connection with his resignation, Mr. Schwartz’s employment agreement with the Company, dated March 17, 2008, was terminated on a without cause basis.

In connection with Mr. Schwartz’s resignation, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Schwartz (the “Schwartz Agreement”) which provides for, among other things, Mr. Schwartz to provide consulting services to the Company for a period of five years in exchange for annual payments from the Company of $17,200.  The Schwartz Agreement also provides for the accelerated vesting of all stock options and restricted stock granted to Mr. Schwartz under the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.  In accordance with his employment agreement with the Company, Mr. Schwartz will be paid a severance payment of $0.9 million and a retirement benefit of $2.0 million.  The severance payment will be paid in a lump sum six months after Mr. Schwartz’s resignation and the retirement benefit will be paid in sixty equal monthly installments and the first six such installments shall not be paid until six months after Mr. Schwartz’s resignation.  As provided under his employment agreement, for a period of three years following his resignation, the Company will provide Mr. Schwartz and his wife with continued group medical and dental insurance coverage or payments in lieu thereof.  Mr. Schwartz’s right to receive such payments under his employment agreement is conditioned upon his execution of a general release with respect to the Company. In accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Schwartz is prohibited from (1) competing with the Company’s business in the United States (or any other area in which the Company conducts substantial business operations) or (2) soliciting, directly or indirectly, any of the Company’s employees, customers or accounts, until the Company’s obligations to make payments under his employment agreement cease.

On February 9, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) approved the election of Richard C. Stockinger to Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  Mr. Stockinger, age 50, has served as a member of the Board since November 2007. The Company will employ Mr. Stockinger on an “at will” basis and at a base annual salary of $350,000.  In addition, Mr. Stockinger will be paid a signing bonus equal to two weeks’ base salary.  Mr. Stockinger will also be eligible to participate in the benefits programs which the Company generally makes available to its senior executives.

On February 9, 2009, the Board elected Darwin C. Dornbush to serve as a Class III member of the Board and as Chairman of the Board.  Mr. Dornbush, currently the Company’s Secretary and a member of the Board from 1995 until 2005, is a partner in Dornbush Schaeffer Strongin & Venaglia, LLP, a law firm to which the Company has incurred, in the current fiscal year and in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, approximately $0.7 million, $0.9 million, $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in legal fees and expenses.  The Company has paid Mr. Dornbush approximately $0.2 million since the beginning of fiscal year 2008 in exchange for certain consulting services.

Amendment of the line of credit agreement

On February 9, 2009, the Company and Wachovia entered into a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and Consent (the “Amendment”), which amends the line of credit agreement dated March 15, 2007.  The Amendment eliminated an event of default tied to the status of certain officers of the Company, changed the maturity date under the Credit Agreement to March 15, 2011 and provided the Bank’s consent to an amendment of the Company’s Bylaws to separate the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and to establish the office of Vice Chairman of the Board.

17

BENIHANA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESTATEMENT

The financial information within the following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations has been updated to reflect the effects of the restatement as further described in Note 2 to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item I, Part I of this Form 10-Q/A.

OVERVIEW

The Company’s revenues consist of sales of food and beverages at the Company’s restaurants and licensing fees from franchised restaurants.  Cost of restaurant food and beverages sold represents the direct cost of the ingredients for the prepared food and beverages sold.  Restaurant operating expenses consist of direct and indirect labor, occupancy costs, advertising and other costs that are directly attributed to each restaurant location.  Restaurant opening costs include rent incurred during the development period, as well as labor, training expenses and certain other pre-opening charges which are expensed as incurred.

Restaurant revenues and expenses are dependent upon a number of factors including the number of restaurants in operation, restaurant patronage and the average check amount.  Expenses are additionally dependent upon commodity costs, average wage rates, marketing costs and the costs of administering restaurant operations.

Total revenues decreased 3.7% in the current three periods ended January 4, 2009, but increased 2.2% in the ten periods ended January 4, 2009. Net (loss) income decreased 427.7% and 163.0% in the current three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009, respectively, when compared to the corresponding periods a year ago.  (Loss) earnings per diluted share decreased 468.4% and 179.3% in the current three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009, respectively, when compared to the corresponding periods a year ago. For purposes of calculating diluted (loss) earnings per share, the Company experienced a decrease of 10.7% and 10.8% in the diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the current three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009, respectively, when compared to the corresponding periods a year ago.

Results for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009 were adversely impacted by a challenging economic environment, resulting in softer sales trends and increased costs at the restaurant level. In response to the ongoing macroeconomic and industry challenges, the Company is actively managing its controllable expenses and, in an effort to drive traffic, continues to highlight the distinct nature of the guest experience with the new multi-media campaign at its Benihana teppanyaki concept and through a combination of media advertising and local marketing initiatives at its RA Sushi and Haru concepts.Additionally, the Company has opted to postpone the remodeling of two Benihana teppanyaki restaurants, reduce capital expenditures and limit near-term expansion to those development projects for which leases have already been executed.

Results for the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009 were impacted by a non-cash long-lived asset impairment charge of $9.6 million ($5.7 million after-tax) and a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $11.9 million ($7.0 million after-tax). For further discussion of this adjustment, refer to Note 12, Impairment Charges, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

18

Effective February 9, 2009, Joel A. Schwartz resigned from his positions as Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and the Board of Directors of the Company approved the election of Richard C. Stockinger to Chief Executive Officer and Darwin C. Dornbush to serve as a Class III member of the Board and as Chairman of the Board. For further discussion, refer to Note 15, Subsequent Events, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

The following tables reflect changes in restaurant count during the three and ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008:

	Three Periods Ended
	January 4, 2009
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi		Haru		Total
Restaurant count, beginning of period		60		21		9		90
Openings		2		1		-		3
Restaurant count, end of period		62		22		9		93
	Three Periods Ended
	January 6, 2008
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi		Haru		Total
Restaurant count, beginning of period		60		14		7		81
Openings		-		2		2		4
Restaurant count, end of period		60		16		9		85

	Ten Periods Ended
	January 4, 2009
	Teppanyaki			RA Sushi		Haru		Total
Restaurant count, beginning of period		60			18		9		87
Openings		2			4		-		6
Restaurant count, end of period		62			22		9		93
	Ten Periods Ended
	January 6, 2008
	Teppanyaki			RA Sushi		Haru		Total
Restaurant count, beginning of period		59			13		7		79
Openings		2			3		2		7
Closings		(1	)		-		-		(1	)
Restaurant count, end of period		60			16		9		85

As of January 4, 2009, there were also 20 franchised Benihana teppanyaki restaurants operating in the United States, Latin America and the Caribbean.

19

REVENUES

Three Periods Ended January 4, 2009 Compared to January 6, 2008:

The following table shows revenues for the three periods ended January 4, 2009 when compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year as well as the related dollar and percentage changes (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Three Periods Ended				Change
	January 4,		January 6,
	2009		2008		$			%
Restaurant sales	$	66,790	$	69,439	$	(2,649	)		-3.8	%
Franchise fees and royalties		424		375		49			13.1	%
Total revenues	$	67,214	$	69,814	$	(2,600	)		-3.7	%

Components of restaurant revenues consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Three Periods Ended				Change
	January 4,		January 6,
	2009		2008		$			%
Total restaurant sales by concept:
Teppanyaki	$	45,994	$	51,666	$	(5,672	)		-11.0	%
RA Sushi		13,271		9,731		3,540			36.4	%
Haru		7,525		8,042		(517	)		-6.4	%
Total restaurant sales	$	66,790	$	69,439	$	(2,649	)		-3.8	%
Comparable restaurant sales by concept:
Teppanyaki	$	43,986	$	49,361	$	(5,375	)		-10.9	%
RA Sushi		8,844		9,730		(886	)		-9.1	%
Haru		6,868		8,043		(1,175	)		-14.6	%
Total comparable restaurant sales	$	59,698	$	67,134	$	(7,436	)		-11.1	%

The decrease in Benihana teppanyaki comparable sales was primarily the result of a 13.9% decrease in dine-in guest counts offset by an increase of 2.5% in the average per person dine-in guest check at locations opened longer than one year. RA Sushi’s decrease in comparable sales was primarily driven by a 6.4% decrease in dine-in guest counts and a decrease of 3.9% in the average per person dine-in guest check at locations opened longer than one year. Haru’s comparable sales decrease was primarily the result of a 14.9% decrease in dine-in guest counts as well as a 21.7% decrease in take-out sales offset by an increase of 1.8% in the average per person dine-in guest check at locations open longer than one year. The decrease in average per person dine-in guest check at RA Sushi is primarily attributable to an extended lower-priced happy hour menu implemented during the second quarter of 2009, partially offset by a 1% price increase on regular menu items also implemented in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in the average per person dine-in guest check at Haru is primarily due to a 1% price increase effected during the second quarter of 2009.

The Company believes that the decreases experienced in comparable guest counts are reflective of the current economic conditions impacting consumers. Earlier economic concerns were primarily concentrated in certain geographic regions, particularly in the Arizona, Southern California, South Florida and Nevada markets where the Company has 16 out of its 22 RA Sushi restaurants and approximately 30% of its Benihana teppanyaki locations as of January 4, 2009. Recent economic developments, however, have negatively impacted consumers in all areas where the Company operates.

20

The following table summarizes the changes in restaurant sales between the three periods ended January 4, 2009and January 6, 2008 (in thousands):

	Teppanyaki			RA Sushi			Haru			Total
Restaurant sales during the three periods ended January 6, 2008	$	51,666		$	9,731		$	8,042		$	69,439
Decrease in comparable sales		(5,375	)		(886	)		(1,175	)		(7,436	)
Increase from new restaurants		736			4,426			658			5,820
Decrease from closed restaurants		(450	)		-			-			(450	)
Decrease from temporary closures, net		(583	)		-			-			(583	)
Restaurant sales during the three periods ended January 4, 2009	$	45,994		$	13,271		$	7,525		$	66,790

The Company anticipates that sales trends will remain soft for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, depressed sales volumes will continue to impact the operating efficiencies attainable at both the restaurant and corporate levels.

Ten Periods Ended January 4, 2009 Compared to January 6, 2008:

The following table shows revenues for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 when compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year as well as the related dollar and percentage changes (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Ten Periods Ended				Change
	January 4,		January 6,
	2009		2008		$		%
Restaurant sales	$	230,290	$	225,394	$	4,896		2.2	%
Franchise fees and royalties		1,364		1,324		40		3.0	%
Total revenues	$	231,654	$	226,718	$	4,936		2.2	%

Components of restaurant revenues consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):

	Ten Periods Ended				Change
	January 4,		January 6,
	2009		2008		$			%
Total restaurant sales by concept:
Teppanyaki	$	156,640	$	166,151	$	(9,511	)		-5.7	%
RA Sushi		45,494		33,287		12,207			36.7	%
Haru		28,156		25,956		2,200			8.5	%
Total restaurant sales	$	230,290	$	225,394	$	4,896			2.2	%
Comparable restaurant sales by concept:
Teppanyaki	$	145,798	$	155,606	$	(9,808	)		-6.3	%
RA Sushi		29,960		33,208		(3,248	)		-9.8	%
Haru		23,382		25,957		(2,575	)		-9.9	%
Total comparable restaurant sales	$	199,140	$	214,771	$	(15,631	)		-7.3	%

The decrease in Benihana teppanyaki comparable sales was primarily the result of a 7.7% decrease in dine-in guest counts offset by an increase of 1.2% in the average per person dine-in guest check at locations opened longer than one year. RA Sushi’s decrease in comparable sales was primarily driven by a 9.7% decrease in dine-in guest counts as well as a decrease of 0.8% in the average per person dine-in guest check at locations opened longer than one year. Haru’s comparable sales decrease was primarily the result of a 12.6% decrease in dine-in guest counts as well as a 19.1% decrease in takeout sales offset by an increase of 4.7% in the average per person dine-in guest check at locations open longer than one year. The increase in the average per person dine-in guest check at Haru is primarily due to a 1% price increase effected during the second quarter of 2009.

21

The Company believes that the decreases experienced in comparable guest counts are reflective of the current economic conditions impacting consumers. Earlier economic concerns were primarily concentrated in certain geographic regions, particularly in the Arizona, Southern California, South Florida and Nevada markets where the Company has 16 out of its 22 RA Sushi restaurants and approximately 30% of its Benihana teppanyaki locations as of January 4, 2009. Recent economic developments, however, have negatively impacted consumers in all areas where the Company operates.

The following table summarizes the changes in restaurant sales between the ten periods ended January 4, 2009and January 6, 2008 (in thousands):

	Teppanyaki			RA Sushi			Haru			Total
Restaurant sales during the ten periods ended January 6, 2008	$	166,151		$	33,287		$	25,956		$	225,394
Decrease in comparable sales		(9,808	)		(3,248	)		(2,575	)		(15,631	)
Increase from new restaurants		3,872			15,455			4,775			24,102
Decrease from closed restaurants		(1,756	)		-			-			(1,756	)
Decrease from temporary closures, net		(1,819	)		-			-			(1,819	)
Restaurant sales during the ten periods ended January 4, 2009	$	156,640		$	45,494		$	28,156		$	230,290

The Company anticipates that sales trends will remain soft for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, depressed sales volumes will continue to impact the operating efficiencies attainable at both the restaurant and corporate levels.

COSTS AND EXPENSES

Three Periods Ended January 4, 2009 Compared to January 6, 2008:

The following table summarizes costs and expenses by concept, as well as consolidated, for the three periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008 (in thousands):

	Three Periods Ended
	January 4, 2009
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi		Haru		Corporate		Consolidated
Cost of food and beverage sales	$	10,880	$	3,447	$	1,698	$	-	$	16,025
Restaurant operating expenses		27,745		8,642		4,884		-		41,271
Restaurant opening costs		395		360		-		-		755
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		1,794		978		366		2,911		6,049
Impairment charges		1,370		16,555		3,580		-		21,505
Total operating expenses	$	42,184	$	29,982	$	10,528	$	2,911	$	85,605

22

	Three Periods Ended
	January 6, 2008
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi		Haru		Corporate		Consolidated
Cost of food and beverage sales	$	12,163	$	2,382	$	1,798	$	-	$	16,343
Restaurant operating expenses		30,459		6,054		4,915		-		41,428
Restaurant opening costs		196		713		318		-		1,227
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		1,816		927		347		3,118		6,208
Impairment charges		-		-		-		-		-
Total operating expenses	$	44,634	$	10,076	$	7,378	$	3,118	$	65,206

The following table summarizes costs and expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales by concept, as well as consolidated, for the three periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008:

	Three Periods Ended
	January 4, 2009
	Teppanyaki			RA Sushi			Haru			Consolidated
Cost of food and beverage sales		23.7	%		26.0	%		22.6	%		24.0	%
Restaurant operating expenses		60.3	%		65.1	%		64.9	%		61.8	%
Restaurant opening costs		0.9	%		2.7	%		0.0	%		1.1	%
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		3.9	%		7.4	%		4.9	%		9.1	%
Impairment charges		3.0	%		124.7	%		47.6	%		32.2	%
Total operating expenses		91.7	%		225.9	%		139.9	%		128.2	%
	Three Periods Ended
	January 6, 2008
	Teppanyaki			RA Sushi			Haru			Consolidated
Cost of food and beverage sales		23.5	%		24.5	%		22.4	%		23.5	%
Restaurant operating expenses		59.0	%		62.2	%		61.1	%		59.7	%
Restaurant opening costs		0.4	%		7.3	%		4.0	%		1.8	%
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		3.5	%		9.5	%		4.3	%		8.9	%
Impairment charges		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Total operating expenses		86.4	%		103.5	%		91.7	%		93.9	%

Cost of food and beverage sales

The cost of food and beverage sales for the current three periods decreased in dollar amount but increased when expressed as a percentage of restaurant sales, when compared to the corresponding period a year ago. Cost of food and beverage sales, which is generally variable with sales, decreased in dollar amount with the net decrease in restaurant sales. The increase, when expressed as a percentage of sales, during the current three periods, is generally attributable to higher year over year commodity costs along with a lower-priced extended happy hour menu implemented during the second quarter of 2009 at the Company’s RA Sushi locations. This increase was partially offset by a 1% menu price increase taken at the Company’s RA Sushi and Haru locations during the second quarter of 2009. While the Company has not been able to increase menu prices sufficiently to fully offset commodity cost increases experienced during fiscal 2009 to date, the Company expects certain of these pressures to ease beginning in the fourth fiscal quarter of the current year. The Company has been able to renew certain commodity purchase agreements at terms more favorable than those in place during the current three periods.

23

Restaurant operating expenses

Restaurant operating expenses decreased in dollar amount but increased when expressed as a percentage of restaurant sales, when compared to the corresponding period a year ago. The slight decrease in absolute amount is primarily due to decreased labor costs as a result of decreasing sales offset by an increase in absolute amount due to the addition of new restaurant units between periods. The increase, when expressed as a percentage of sales, is a result of increased utilities, operating inefficiencies associated with decreasing comparable sales in the current period at mature restaurants, specifically as it relates to fixed costs, including occupancy and depreciation expense, and inefficiencies associated with the opening of two new Benihana teppanyaki restaurants and one new RA Sushi restaurant.

The Company recognized additional depreciation expense totaling $0.3 million during the three periods ended January 6, 2008, which resulted from reevaluating the remaining useful lives of assets at Benihana teppanyaki restaurants to be renovated as part of the Company’s rejuvenation program. No similar charges were recognized during the three periods ended January 4, 2009. During the three periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, the Company incurred $0.2 million in ongoing expenses at Benihana teppanyaki restaurants temporarily closed for remodeling.

Restaurant opening costs

Restaurant opening costs in the three periods ended January 4, 2009 decreased in dollar amount and as a percentage of sales when compared to the prior year corresponding period. The decrease in the current period when compared to the equivalent period a year ago is due to the timing of store openings.

Marketing, general and administrative costs

Marketing, general and administrative costs decreased in dollar amount but increased when expressed as a percentage of sales in the three periods ended January 4, 2009, as compared to the prior year corresponding period. The decrease in absolute amount is primarily due to the recovery of approximately $0.4 million during the three periods ended January 4, 2009 related to a promissory note due from one of the Company’s franchisees, which was previously deemed uncollectible. The increase, when expressed as a percentage of sales, is directly related to the decrease in sales during the current three periods.

On February 9, 2009, Joel A. Schwartz resigned from his positions as Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  In accordance with his employment agreement with the Company, Mr. Schwartz will be paid a severance payment of $0.9 million and a retirement benefit of $2.0 million. The Company will also incur additional compensation expense for the acceleration of the vesting of all stock options and restricted stock granted to Mr. Schwartz under the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.  The severance payment will be paid in a lump sum six months after Mr. Schwartz’s resignation and the retirement benefit will be paid in sixty equal monthly installments and the first six such installments shall not be paid until six months after Mr. Schwartz’s resignation.  As provided under his employment agreement, for a period of three years following his resignation, the Company will provide Mr. Schwartz and his wife with continued group medical and dental insurance coverage or payments in lieu thereof. Accordingly, the Company will recognize a charge totaling approximately $3.2 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.

Impairment charges

During the three periods ended January 4, 2009, as a result of a prolonged economic downturn and its resulting impact on the Company’s expectation of future cash flows, the Company determined that a change in circumstances had occurred and the carrying value of certain of its property and equipment may not be recoverable. As a result, the Company performed an analysis of the carrying value of its property and equipment. As further discussed in Note 12, Impairment Charges, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, during the three periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9.6 million ($5.7 million after-tax) related to the write-down of property and equipment to estimated fair value at five restaurants.

Additionally, the Company reviews goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment during the third quarter, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process.  The first step is a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit is greater than its fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The purpose of the second step is only to determine the amount of goodwill that should be recorded on the balance sheet. The Company evaluated goodwill as of the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 at the reporting unit level using an estimation of fair value based upon (1) an analysis of discounted cash flow projections (income approach) and (2) an analysis of cash flows of the reporting unit using market-derived earnings multiples of similar restaurant businesses that were bought and sold within a reasonable time frame to the Company’s evaluation (market approach).

24

Based on the results of step one of the impairment tests, the Benihana and Haru reporting units’ estimated fair values exceeded their carrying values. No impairment charges to goodwill for these reporting units were recognized. Based on the results of step one of the impairment test, the RA Sushi reporting unit’s estimated fair value did not exceed its carrying value; therefore, the second step of the impairment test was performed. The second step involves an analysis reflecting the allocation of the fair value determined in the first step (as if it was the purchase price in a business combination). The recorded amounts of other items on the balance sheet are not adjusted. As further discussed in Note 12, Impairment Charges, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $11.9 million ($7.0 million after-tax) related to the write-down of goodwill allocated to the RA Sushi reporting unit to its implied fair value as determined by step two of the goodwill impairment test.

The Company will continue to monitor events in future periods to determine if additional impairment testing is warranted.

Interest (expense) income, net

Interest expense increased in the three periods ended January 4, 2009 when compared to the prior year corresponding period as the Company continued to draw on the line of credit to finance its expansion and renovation programs. Interest income decreased in the three periods ended January 4, 2009 when compared to the corresponding period in prior year and is expected to decrease in the future as the Company is in a net borrowing position.

Income tax provision

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 43.9% and 33.3% for the three periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, respectively. During the three periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company’s effective income tax rate was impacted by a pretax loss in the current year, the resolution of uncertain tax positions totaling $0.4 million, which were previously recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48, as well as increasing tax credits with decreasing taxable income.

Ten Periods Ended January 4, 2009 Compared to January 6, 2008:

The following table summarizes costs and expenses by concept, as well as consolidated, for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008 (in thousands):

	Ten Periods Ended
	January 4, 2009
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi		Haru		Corporate		Consolidated
Cost of food and beverage sales	$	37,455	$	11,606	$	6,463	$	-	$	55,524
Restaurant operating expenses		97,584		28,905		17,422		-		143,911
Restaurant opening costs		498		1,240		-		-		1,738
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		6,238		3,369		1,356		9,609		20,572
Impairment charges		1,370		16,555		3,580		-		21,505
Total operating expenses	$	143,145	$	61,675	$	28,821	$	9,609	$	243,250

	Ten Periods Ended
	January 6, 2008
	Teppanyaki		RA Sushi		Haru		Corporate		Consolidated
Cost of food and beverage sales	$	39,065	$	8,187	$	5,789	$	-	$	53,041
Restaurant operating expenses		100,074		19,820		14,799		-		134,693
Restaurant opening costs		667		1,273		748		-		2,688
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		6,048		3,261		1,188		10,777		21,274
Impairment charges		-		-		-		-		-
Total operating expenses	$	145,854	$	32,541	$	22,524	$	10,777	$	211,696

25

The following table summarizes costs and expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales by concept, as well as consolidated, for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008:

	Ten Periods Ended
	January 4, 2009
	Teppanyaki			RA Sushi			Haru			Consolidated
Cost of food and beverage sales		23.9	%		25.5	%		23.0	%		24.1	%
Restaurant operating expenses		62.3	%		63.5	%		61.9	%		62.5	%
Restaurant opening costs		0.3	%		2.7	%		0.0	%		0.8	%
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		4.0	%		7.4	%		4.8	%		8.9	%
Impairment charges		0.9	%		36.4	%		12.7	%		9.3	%
Total operating expenses		91.4	%		135.6	%		102.4	%		105.6	%
	Ten Periods Ended
	January 6, 2008
	Teppanyaki			RA Sushi			Haru			Consolidated
Cost of food and beverage sales		23.5	%		24.6	%		22.3	%		23.5	%
Restaurant operating expenses		60.2	%		59.5	%		57.0	%		59.8	%
Restaurant opening costs		0.4	%		3.8	%		2.9	%		1.2	%
Marketing, general and administrative expenses		3.6	%		9.8	%		4.6	%		9.4	%
Impairment charges		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Total operating expenses		87.8	%		97.8	%		86.8	%		93.9	%

Cost of food and beverage sales

The cost of food and beverage sales increased in the current ten periods in dollar amount and when expressed as a percentage of restaurant sales, when compared to the corresponding period a year ago. Cost of food and beverage sales, which is generally variable with sales, increased with the net increase in restaurant sales and due to increased commodity prices during the current fiscal year. The increase, when expressed as a percentage of sales, during the current ten periods is primarily attributable to the increase in commodity prices as well as a lower-price extended happy hour menu implemented during the second quarter of 2009 at the Company’s RA Sushi locations. This increase was partially offset by a 1% menu price increase at the Company’s RA Sushi and Haru locations during the second quarter of 2009. While the Company has not been able to increase menu prices sufficiently to fully offset commodity cost increases experienced during fiscal 2009 to date, the Company expects certain of these pressures to ease beginning in the fourth fiscal quarter of the current year. The Company has been able to renew certain commodity purchase agreements at terms more favorable than those in place during the current ten periods.

26

Restaurant operating expenses

Restaurant operating expenses increased in dollar amount and when expressed as a percentage of restaurant sales when compared to the corresponding period a year ago. The increase in absolute amount is primarily due to the increase in number of restaurant units experienced between periods. The increase, when expressed as a percentage of sales, is a result of operating inefficiencies associated with decreasing comparable sales in the current period at mature restaurants, specifically as it relates to labor, utilities and fixed costs including occupancy and depreciation expense, as well as the opening of two new Benihana teppanyaki restaurants and four new RA Sushi restaurants. Offsetting the increase in restaurant operating expenses during the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 is $0.5 million in business interruption insurance proceeds, which were received and recognized during the period. The business interruption proceeds relate to the Benihana teppanyaki restaurant located in Memphis, TN that was damaged by fire in February 2008. No similar proceeds were recognized during the prior fiscal year.

The Company recognized additional depreciation expense totaling $0.4 million and $2.1 million during the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, respectively, which resulted from reevaluating the remaining useful lives of assets at Benihana teppanyaki restaurants to be renovated as part of the Company’s rejuvenation program. During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, the Company incurred $1.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively, in ongoing expenses at Benihana teppanyaki restaurants temporarily closed for remodeling.

Restaurant opening costs

Restaurant opening costs in the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 decreased in dollar amount and as a percentage of sales as compared to the prior year corresponding period.  The decrease in the current period when compared to the equivalent period a year ago is due to the timing of store openings.

Marketing, general and administrative costs

Marketing, general and administrative costs decreased in dollar amount and when expressed as a percentage of sales in the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 as compared to the prior year corresponding period. The decrease in absolute amount is primarily due to the recovery of approximately $0.4 million during the three periods ended January 4, 2009 related to a promissory note due from one of the Company’s franchisees, which was previously deemed uncollectible.

On February 9, 2009, Joel A. Schwartz resigned from his positions as Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  In accordance with his employment agreement with the Company, Mr. Schwartz will be paid a severance payment of $0.9 million and a retirement benefit of $2.0 million.  The Company will also incur additional compensation expense for the acceleration of the vesting of all stock options and restricted stock granted to Mr. Schwartz under the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The severance payment will be paid in a lump sum six months after Mr. Schwartz’s resignation and the retirement benefit will be paid in sixty equal monthly installments and the first six such installments shall not be paid until six months after Mr. Schwartz’s resignation.  As provided under his employment agreement, for a period of three years following his resignation, the Company will provide Mr. Schwartz and his wife with continued group medical and dental insurance coverage or payments in lieu thereof. Accordingly, the Company will recognize a charge totaling approximately $3.2 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.

Impairment charges

During the three periods ended January 4, 2009, as a result of a prolonged economic downturn and its resulting impact on the Company’s expectation of future cash flows, the Company determined that a change in circumstances had occurred and the carrying value of certain of its property and equipment may not be recoverable. As a result, the Company performed an analysis of the carrying value of its property and equipment. As further discussed in Note 12, Impairment Charges, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, during the three periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $9.6 million ($5.7 million after-tax) related to the write-down of property and equipment to estimated fair value at five restaurants.

Additionally, the Company reviews goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment during the third quarter, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process.  The first step is a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit is greater than its fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The purpose of the second step is only to determine the amount of goodwill that should be recorded on the balance sheet. The Company evaluated goodwill as of the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 at the reporting unit level using an estimation of fair value based upon (1) an analysis of discounted cash flow projections (income approach) and (2) an analysis of cash flows of the reporting unit using market-derived earnings multiples of similar restaurant businesses that were bought and sold within a reasonable time frame to the Company’s evaluation (market approach).  Based on the results of step one of the impairment tests, the Benihana and Haru reporting units’ estimated fair values exceeded their carrying values. No impairment charges to goodwill for these reporting units were recognized.

27

Based on the results of step one of the impairment test, the RA Sushi reporting unit’s estimated fair value did not exceed its carrying value; therefore, the second step of the impairment test was performed. The second step involves an analysis reflecting the allocation of the fair value determined in the first step (as if it was the purchase price in a business combination). The recorded amounts of other items on the balance sheet are not adjusted. As further discussed in Note 12, Impairment Charges, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $11.9 million ($7.0 million after-tax) related to the write-down of goodwill allocated to the RA Sushi reporting unit to its implied fair value as determined by step two of the goodwill impairment test.

The Company will continue to monitor events in future periods to determine if additional impairment testing is warranted.

Interest (expense) income, net

Interest expense increased in the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 when compared to the prior year corresponding period as the Company continued to draw on the line of credit to finance the expansion and renovation programs. Interest income decreased in the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 when compared to the corresponding period in prior year and is expected to decrease in the future as the Company is in a net borrowing position.

Income tax provision

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 48.6% and 35.3% for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, respectively. During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company’s effective income tax rate was impacted by a pretax loss in the current year, the resolution of uncertain tax positions totaling $0.4 million, which were previously recognized upon the adoption of FIN 48, as well as increasing tax credits with decreasing taxable income.

FINANCIAL RESOURCES

At January 4, 2009, the Company has available up to $60 million from Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”) under the terms of a line of credit entered on March 15, 2007 and the Second Amendment to the line of credit facility (“the Amendment”) entered into on November 19, 2008. The amended line of credit facility allows the Company to borrow up to $60 million through March 15, 2012, provided that $10 million of such commitment is subject to Wachovia’s successfully syndicating a portion of the loan or the Company attaining a leverage ratio of less than 3.5 to 1.0 for two consecutive fiscal quarters, and is secured by the assets of the Company. The Amendment also permits the Company to further increase the commitment under the credit agreement up to an additional $15 million, subject to certain terms and conditions. There are no scheduled payments prior to maturity; however, the Company may prepay outstanding borrowings prior to that date. The Amendment provides for a commitment fee of 0.3% on the unused portion of the loan commitment. Interest rates payable under the amended credit agreement vary depending on the Company’s leverage ratio and range from 1.25% to 3.50% above the applicable LIBOR rate or, at the Company’s option, from 0.0% to 2.0% above the applicable interest rate. For an interim period, the Amendment both decreases the fixed charge coverage ratio and increases the leverage ratio, which the Company is required to maintain under the credit agreement. At January 4, 2009, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants of the credit agreement with Wachovia.

At January 4, 2009, the Company had $28.6 million outstanding under the amended line of credit facility with Wachovia at an interest rate of 2.2%; borrowings from which were used to fund capital expenditures in connection with its expansion program.  The amount available to be borrowed under the line of credit is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the cumulative amount of any outstanding letters of credit, which totaled $0.5 million at January 4, 2009. Accordingly, at January 4, 2009, the Company has available $20.9 million for borrowing, with an additional $10 million available under certain terms and conditions under the line of credit facility.

28

The Company believes that, under the terms of the amended credit facility, it has sufficient capital available to execute its expansion plans, along with the flexibility necessary to operate in the current economic environment. The Company’s liquidity and capital resource strategies are focused on managing capital to maintain compliance with the financial ratios contained in the amended line of credit agreement with Wachovia. To the extent that in the future the Company believes that it will be unable to comply with the covenants contained in the amended line of credit agreement, it will seek an amendment or waiver of its amended line of credit agreement, which could increase the cost of debt.  If the Company was unable to obtain a waiver or amendment, the failure to satisfy these ratios would result in a default under its line of credit agreement and could permit acceleration of all of its indebtedness.

On February 9, 2009, the Company and Wachovia entered into a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement and Consent (the “Amendment”), which amends the line of credit agreement dated March 15, 2007.  The Amendment eliminated an event of default tied to the status of certain officers of the Company, changed the maturity date under the Credit Agreement to March 15, 2011 and provided the Bank’s consent to an amendment of the Company’s Bylaws to separate the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and to establish the office of Vice Chairman of the Board.

The Company has entered into non-cancellable supply agreements for the purchase of beef and certain seafood items, in the normal course of business, at fixed prices for periods up to twelve months.  These supply agreements will eliminate volatility in the cost of the commodities over the terms of the agreements. These supply agreements are not considered derivative contracts.

Since restaurant businesses do not have large amounts of inventory and accounts receivable, there is generally no need to finance such items.  As a result, many restaurant businesses, including the Company, operate with negative working capital. During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009, working capital deficit has increased by $8.9 million. This trend is reflective of the Company’s ongoing expansion, which has resulted in decreased cash and cash equivalents as well as increased liabilities associated with capital expenditures.

The following table summarizes the sources and uses of cash and cash equivalents (in thousands):

	Ten Periods Ended
	January 4,			January 6,
	2009			2008
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	28,427		$	25,147
Net cash used in investing activities		(38,590	)		(41,772	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		10,376			10,129
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	213		$	(6,496	)

The Company implemented a design initiative to develop a prototype Benihana teppanyaki restaurant to improve the unit-level economics while shortening construction time and improving decor. To date, the Company has opened seven new locations using this design.  Under a renovation program commenced during 2005, the Company is also using many of the design elements of the new prototype to refurbish the Company’s mature Benihana teppanyaki restaurant units. The Memphis location, which was previously destroyed by fire, was rebuilt using the prototype design as well.

During fiscal 2006, management made a strategic decision to accelerate the renovation and revitalization program, by transforming a planned 24 mature Benihana teppanyaki units in order to opportunistically build a stronger foundation for its core brand amid a growing American appetite for Asian cuisine. Given the current economic environment, the Company has opted to postpone the remodeling of the last two Benihana teppanyaki restaurants and reduce capital expenditures. The two postponed units will be refurbished at a later time under the Company’s normal maintenance program. During the current quarter, the Company completed its renovation program with the renovation of an aggregate 22 of its mature Benihana teppanyaki restaurants, using many of the design elements of the new prototype Benihana teppanyaki restaurant.

Renovations required on average, between $2.0 million and $2.3 million in capital expenditures per unit. The cost to remodel each unit was directly dependent on the scope of work to be performed at each location. The scope of work could be impacted by the age of the location, current condition of the location as well as local permitting requirements. The renovation of the older Benihana teppanyaki units was necessary to ensure the continued relevance of the Benihana brand and will enhance the Company’s leadership position as the premier choice for Japanese-style dining.

29

Other future capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including market acceptance of products, the timing and rate of expansion of the business, acquisitions and other factors.  The Company has experienced increases in its expenditures commensurate with growth in its operations. The Company has, however, limited near-term expansion to those development projects for which leases have already been executed. As of January 30, 2009, the Company had ten restaurants under development, consisting of five Benihana teppanyaki restaurants and five RA Sushi restaurants.

In addition to investments in new restaurant units, the Company will use its capital resources to settle the outstanding liability incurred when the Minority Stockholders exercised their put option in Haru Holding Corp. on July 1, 2005. The Company believes that the proper application of the put option price formula would result in a payment to the former Minority Stockholders of approximately $3.7 million.  The Company has offered to pay such amount to the former Minority Stockholders and recorded a $3.7 million liability with respect thereto.  As further discussed in Part II. Item 1, Legal Proceedings, the former Minority Stockholders of Haru Holding Corp. (“Haru”) are seeking an award of $10.7 million in respect of the exercise of the put option on their remaining 20% interest in Haru.  The Company believes that it has correctly calculated the put option price at $3.7 million.  However, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of this litigation.

As further discussed in Note 15, Subsequent Events, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company will use its capital resources to fund the cash obligation of $2.9 million in connection with the resignation of Joel A. Schwartz from his positions as Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Management believes that the Company’s cash from operations and the funds available under its credit facility will provide sufficient capital to fund operations, commitments and contingencies and restaurant expansion for at least the next twelve months.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $28.4 million and $25.1 million for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, respectively. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in the working capital deficit during the current ten periods when compared to the comparable ten periods a year ago.

Investing Activities

Capital expenditures were $40.8 and $41.8 million for the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, respectively. Full-year fiscal 2009 capital expenditures are expected to decrease as compared to full-year fiscal 2008 in response to the current macroeconomic conditions where the Company has opted to reduce capital expenditures and has limited near-term expansion to those development projects for which leases have already been executed.

During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company received $1.9 million in insurance proceeds related to the Benihana teppanyaki restaurant located in Memphis, TN that was damaged by fire, which proceeds were used to rebuild the restaurant. The Memphis, TN location re-opened on January 21, 2009.

During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company entered into a franchise agreement with a third-party for the operation of the Monterey location and, concurrently, entered into an agreement for the sale of the Monterey location’s assets, which had collateralized the promissory note. The proceeds from the sale of assets resulted in a partial recovery of approximately $0.4 million of the promissory note, accrued interests and costs owed by the prior franchisee. Refer to Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, in the notes to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Financing Activities

The Company began drawing on its line of credit in fiscal year 2008.  Additionally, the Company expects to continue to draw on the line of credit in the near future, as a result of planned development. Refer to “Financial Resources” above for a discussion of the amended terms of the Company’s line of credit facility. During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company borrowed $84.5 million under the credit facility and made $73.3 million in payments. During the ten periods ended January 6, 2008, the Company borrowed $41.9 million under the credit facility and made $35.0 million in payments.

30

During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to the line of credit facility, and the Company incurred $0.1 million in debt issuance costs in connection with the amendment.

During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009, proceeds from stock option exercises totaled less than $0.1 million, and during the ten periods ended January 6, 2008, proceeds from stock option exercises totaled $2.6 million.

During the ten periods ended January 4, 2009 and January 6, 2008, the Company paid $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in dividends on the Series B preferred stock.

Contractual Obligations

With the exception of the $0.9 million severance payment and the $2.0 million retirement obligation, as further discussed in Note 15, Subsequent Events, of the unaudited interim condenced consolidated financial statements, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of business during the interim period to those contractual obligations disclosed in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 30, 2008.

Critical Accounting Policies

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Preparation of these statements requires management to make judgments and estimates.  Some accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements.  A summary of significant accounting policies and estimates and a description of accounting policies that are considered critical may be found in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on June 13, 2008, in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the Critical Accounting Policies section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

There were no significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies during the ten periods ended January 4, 2009.

Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of an asset may not be recoverable. Assets are grouped and evaluated for impairment at the lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows, primarily at the individual restaurant level.  When indicators of potential impairment are present, the carrying values of the assets are evaluated in relation to the operating performance and estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the underlying restaurant. If a forecast of undiscounted future operating cash flows directly related to the restaurant is less than the carrying amount of the restaurant’s long-lived assets, the carrying amount is compared to fair value.  An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the restaurant’s long-lived assets exceeds its fair value, and the charge is taken against results of operations. Fair value is an estimate based on a net present value model, which discounts projected free cash flows at a computed weighted average cost of capital as the discount rate. The projected free cash flows used in calculating estimated fair value involve a significant amount of management judgment and include management’s best estimates of expected future comparable sales and operating performance for each restaurant.

The Company’s evaluation of its long-lived assets at January 4, 2009 indicated an impairment of $9.6 million ($5.7 million after-tax).

The Company reviews goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment during the third quarter, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process.  The first step is a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit is greater than its fair value, there is an indication that impairment may exist and the second step must be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The purpose of the second step is only to determine the amount of goodwill that should be recorded on the balance sheet. Goodwill is evaluated under the first step at the reporting unit level using an estimation of fair value based upon (1) an analysis of discounted cash flow projections (income approach) and (2) an analysis of cash flows of the reporting unit using market-derived earnings multiples of similar restaurant businesses that were bought and sold within a reasonable time frame to the Company’s evaluation (market approach).  The second step, if required, involves an analysis reflecting the allocation of the fair value determined in the first step (as if it was the purchase price in a business combination).

31

The Company’s evaluation of the goodwill allocated to the RA Sushi reporting unit at January 4, 2009 indicated impairment of $11.9 million ($7.0 million after-tax).

The Company will continue to monitor events in future periods to determine if additional impairment testing is warranted.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”).  SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value measures required under other accounting pronouncements but does not change existingguidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value.  SFAS 157 is effective for financial assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB amended SFAS 157 by issuing FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13,” which states that SFAS 157 does not address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement. In February 2008, the FASB also issued FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, for non-financial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis.

In accordance with FSP FAS 157-2, the Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of applying the provisions of SFAS 157 to its non-financial assets and liabilities beginning in fiscal 2010, including (but not limited to) the valuation of its reporting units for the purpose of assessing goodwill impairment and the valuation of property and equipment and other long-term assets when assessing long-lived asset impairment.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R  establishes the principles and requirements on how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree as well as the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141R also requires certain disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Acquisition costs associated with the business combination will generally be expensed as incurred. SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations occurring in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early adoption of SFAS 141R is not permitted. Acquisitions, if any, after the effective date will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 141R.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 applies to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require noncontrolling interests to be reported as a component of equity, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions and any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is to be applied prospectively to business combinations consummated on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after December 15, 2008. Acquisitions, if any, after the effective date will be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 160.

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains various “forward-looking statements” made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These forward-looking statements represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including unit growth, future capital expenditures and other operating information.  A number of factors could, either individually or in combination, cause actual results to differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements, including changes in consumer dining preferences, fluctuations in commodity prices, availability of qualified employees, changes in the general economy, industry cyclicality, and in consumer disposable income, competition within the restaurant industry, availability of suitable restaurant locations, harsh weather conditions in areas in which the Company and its franchisees operate restaurants or plan to build new restaurants, acceptance of the Company’s concepts in new locations, changes in governmental laws and regulations affecting labor rates, employee benefits, and franchising, ability to complete restaurant construction and renovation programs and obtain governmental permits on a reasonably timely basis, an adverse outcome in the dispute between the Company and the Minority Stockholders of Haru and other factors that the Company cannot presently foresee.

32

The Impact of Inflation

The primary inflationary factors affecting the Company’s operations are labor and commodity costs. Other than labor costs, inflation has not been a significant factor in the Company’s business for the past several years.  Profitability is dependent, among other things, on the Company’s ability to anticipate and react to changes in the costs of operating resources, including food and other raw materials, labor and other supplies and services. To the extent permitted by competition, the Company has mitigated increased costs by increasing menu prices and may continue to do so if deemed necessary in the future. To the extent that price increases cannot be passed along to the Company’s customers, those increases could impact the Company’s financial results. The Company increased menu prices at its RA Sushi and Haru locations by 1% during the second fiscal quarter of 2009 to mitigate the impact of increases in commodity costs and minimum wage rates.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to certain risks of increasing interest rates and commodity prices.  The interest on the Company’s indebtedness is largely variable and is benchmarked to the prime rate in the United States or to the London interbank offering rate.  The Company may protect itself from interest rate increases from time-to-time by entering into derivative agreements that fix the interest rate at predetermined levels.  The Company has a policy not to use derivative agreements for trading purposes.  The Company has no derivative agreements as of January 4, 2009.

The Company had $28.6 million of borrowings outstanding under its line of credit facility at January 4, 2009. Based on the amounts outstanding as of January 4, 2009, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would result in an approximate change to interest expense of approximately $0.3 million.

The Company purchases commodities such as chicken, beef, lobster and shrimp for the Company’s restaurants.  The prices of these commodities may be volatile depending upon market conditions.  The Company does not purchase forward commodity contracts because the changes in prices for them have historically been short-term in nature and, in the Company’s view, the cost of the contracts is in excess of the benefits.

The Company has entered into supply agreements for the purchase of beef and certain seafood items, in the normal course of business, at fixed prices for up to twelve month terms.  These supply agreements will eliminate volatility in the cost of the commodities over the terms of the agreements.  These supply agreements are not considered derivative contracts.

Seasonality of Business

The Company has a 52/53-week fiscal year.  The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday occurring within the dates of March 26 through April 1.  The Company divides the fiscal year into 13 four-week periods.  Because of the odd number of periods, the Company’s first fiscal quarter consists of 4 periods totaling 16 weeks and each of the remaining three quarters consists of 3 periods totaling 12 weeks each.  In the event of a 53-week year, the additional week is included in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.  This operating calendar provides the Company a consistent number of operating days within each period, as well as ensures that certain holidays significant to the Company occur consistently within the same fiscal quarters.  Because of the differences in length of fiscal quarters, however, results of operations between the first quarter and the later quarters of a fiscal year are not comparable.  Fiscal year 2009 will end on March 29, 2009 and fiscal year 2008 ended on March 30, 2008, where both fiscal years consist of 52 weeks each.

The Company’s business is not highly seasonal although it has more patrons coming to the Company’s Benihana teppanyaki restaurants for special holidays such as Mother’s Day, Valentine’s Day and New Year’s Eve.  Mother’s Day falls in the Company’s first fiscal quarter of each year, New Year’s Eve falls in the third quarter and Valentine’s Day falls in the fourth quarter.

33

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Company recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only a reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the Company was necessarily required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

In connection with the restatement discussed in the Explanatory Note to this Form 10-Q/A and in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, under the direction of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted a reevaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation, the Company identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the application of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), as it applies to the evaluation of the goodwill allocated to its three reporting units: Benihana teppanyaki, RA Sushi and Haru. Specifically, the design of controls over the preparation and review of the first step of the goodwill impairment test did not timely detect that the Company’s application of SFAS 142 was not in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles until subsequent to the issuance of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Solely as a result of this material weakness, the Company now concludes that its internal control over financial reporting was not effective at a reasonable assurance level as of the period covered by this report.

To remediate the material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting as described above, the Company has enhanced its controls over the preparation and the review of the goodwill impairment tests required by SFAS 142, specifically by adding a third-party valuation firm to assist with the review of the impairment tests. The Company anticipates that the foregoing enhancement to its internal control over financial reporting relating to the application of SFAS 142 will remediate the material weakness identified for the time period covered by the Company’s Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During fiscal 2009, the Company began designing and implementing a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system and certain supply chain modules to integrate and improve the financial and operational aspects of its business.   On November 11, 2008, the Company transitioned its financial accounting and reporting processes to the new ERP system as part of a phased implementation plan. The implementation of this new ERP system involved changes to the Company’s procedures for internal control over financial reporting. The Company followed a detailed implementation plan that required significant pre-implementation planning, design and testing. The Company has also conducted and will continue to conduct extensive post-implementation review to ensure that the internal controls over financial reporting are properly designed.

With the exception of the implementation of the new ERP system discussed above, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Haru Minority Interest

In December 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of 80% of the equity of Haru Holding Corp. ("Haru"). The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, at any time during the period from July 1, 2005 through September 30, 2005, the holders of the balance of Haru's equity (the “Minority Stockholders”) had a one-time option to sell their remaining shares to the Company (the "put option").  The exercise price under the put option was to be calculated as  four and one-half (4½) times Haru's consolidated cash flow for the fiscal year ended March 27, 2005 less the amount of Haru's debt (as that term is defined in the purchase agreement) at the date of the computation. On July 1, 2005, the Minority Stockholders exercised the put option, and the Company acquired the remaining 20% of the equity of Haru.

34

The Company believes that the proper application of the put option price formula would result in a payment to the former Minority Stockholders of approximately $3.7 million. The Company has offered to pay such amount to the former Minority Stockholders and recorded a $3.7 million liability with respect thereto.

On August 25, 2006, the former Minority Stockholders sued the Company. The suit (which was originally filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, but has since been removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York) seeks an award of $10.7 million based on the former Minority Stockholders’ own calculation of the put option price formula and actions allegedly taken by the Company to reduce the value of the put option.

On December 19, 2007, the Court dismissed all of the claims against the Company, except for the breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract claims. On January 25, 2008, the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Amended Complaint. The parties have completed fact and expert discovery. The Court has set a dispositive motion filing deadline of March 2, 2009, and all parties have indicated they will be filing such motions. On December 22, 2008, the Court entered an order referring the case for a settlement conference, which will take place on March 12, 2009.

The Company believes that it has correctly calculated the put option price and that the claims of the former Minority Stockholders are without merit. However, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of this litigation.

Other Litigation

On May 17, 2007, Benihana Monterey Corporation, a subsidiary of the Company, filed a complaint in the action, Benihana Monterey Corporation v. Nara Benihana Monterey, Inc., et al. The action was commenced against various defendants in connection with a default on a Promissory Note in the amount of $0.4 million signed by one of the Company’s franchisees and a Personal Guaranty signed by the owner of such franchise.  The Company has obtained judgment against the defendant for approximately $0.5 million, including repayment of the $0.4 million Promissory Note, interest and costs. The Company has served the defendant with an order regarding examination of the defendant’s assets and has filed a subpoena requiring the defendant and the defendant’s entities to produce substantial documents.  During fiscal year 2008, the Company recorded a $0.4 million reserve for the estimated portion of the Promissory Note and accrued interest that would not be collectible. On December 4, 2008, the Company entered into a franchise agreement with a third-party for the operation of the Monterey location and, concurrently, entered into an agreement for the sale of the Monterey location’s assets, which had collateralized the Promissory Note. The proceeds from the sale of assets resulted in a partial recovery of approximately $0.4 million of the Promissory Note, accrued interests and costs. The remaining balance of the Promissory Note and accrued interest is not probable of being collected and was written off during the three periods ended January 4, 2009.

The Company is not subject to any other pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine claims incidental to its business, which the Company does not believe will materially impact results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2008, which could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition or future results.  Except for the risk factors set forth below, there have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2008.  The risks described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to management may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and/or operating results.

The recent general economic conditions and the disruptions in the financial markets may adversely impact consumer spending patterns and the availability and cost of credit.

The disruptions in the financial markets have had an adverse effect on the economy, which may negatively impact consumer spending patterns. A decrease in discretionary spending due to decreases in consumer confidence in the economy could impact the frequency with which customers choose to dine out or the amount they spend on meals while dining out, thereby decreasing revenues or adversely impacting the Company’s operating results. The continuing adverse impact of decreasing revenues and operating results may also impact the Company’s ability to comply with covenants contained in its credit agreement. The disruptions in the financial markets and continuing economic downturn may adversely impact the availability of credit already arranged and the availability and cost of credit in the future. There can be no assurance that government responses to the disruptions in the financial markets will restore consumer confidence, stabilize the markets or increase the availability of credit.

35

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders held on October 23, 3008, the holders of the Company’s Common Stock, along with the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock, voted to elect two Class I Directors for a term of three years, and the holders of the Company’s Class A Common Stock voted to elect one Class I Director for a term of three years.  Additionally, all stockholders voted to approve the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Results of the voting were as follows:

Class I Common Stock Nominees	For	Withheld
J. Ronald Castell	4,241,318	2,719,387
Taka Yoshimoto	4,619,151	2,341,554
Class I Class A Stock Nominee	For	Withheld
Joseph J. West	8,743,425	240,587

Accordingly, the following directors were elected at the meeting:

J. Ronald Castell, Joseph J. West and Taka Yoshimoto

Other Directors whose term of office continued after the meeting are set forth below:

John E. Abdo, Norman Becker, Lewis Jaffe, Joel A. Schwartz, Richard Stockinger and Robert B. Sturges

On February 9, 2009, Joel A. Schwartz resigned from his positions as Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and the Board of Directors of the Company approved the election of Richard C. Stockinger to Chief Executive Officer and Darwin C. Dornbush to serve as a Class III member of the Board and as Chairman of the Board. For further discussion, refer to Note 15, Subsequent Events, of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

Ratification for the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, was achieved with the following voting results:

	For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Vote
Total votes	7,838,860	20,636	408	-

36

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

Exhibit 10.35 –	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 31, 2008 between Juan C. Garcia and the Company.
Exhibit 10.36 –	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 31, 2008 between Jose I. Ortega and the Company.
Exhibit 10.37 –	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 31, 2008 between Taka Yoshimoto and the Company.
Exhibit 31.1 –	Chief Executive Officer’s certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.2 –	Chief Financial Officer’s certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.1 –	Chief Executive Officer’s certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2 –	Chief Financial Officer’s certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

37

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Benihana Inc.

(Registrant)

Date:  June 26, 2009	/s/ Jose I. Ortega
	Jose I. Ortega
	Vice President - Finance and
	Chief Financial Officer