COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2024

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Facility Leases

Acacia primarily leases office facilities under operating lease arrangements that will end in various years through September 2027.

On June 7, 2019, Acacia entered into a building lease agreement with Jamboree Center 4 LLC. Pursuant to the lease, we had leased 8,293 square feet of office space in Irvine, California. The lease commenced on August 1, 2019. The term of the lease was 60 months from the commencement date, provided for annual rent increases, and did not provide us the right to early terminate or extend our lease terms. The lease expired on July 31, 2024, and was not renewed or extended. On April 29, 2024, Acacia entered into a building lease agreement with Metro Pointe 13580 Lot Two, a California Limited Partnership. Pursuant to the lease, we have leased 1,820 square feet of office space in Costa Mesa, California. The lease commenced on July 1, 2024. The term of the lease is 38 months from the commencement date, provides for annual rent increases, and does not provide us the right to early terminate or extend our lease terms.

On January 7, 2020, Acacia entered into a building lease agreement with Sage Realty Corporation. Pursuant to the lease, as amended, we have leased approximately 4,600 square feet of office space for our corporate headquarters in New York, New York. The lease commenced on February 1, 2020. The term of the initial lease was 24 months from the commencement date, provided for annual rent increases, and did not provide us the right to early terminate or extend our lease terms. During August 2021, we entered into a first amendment of the New York office lease, to commence for a period of three years upon landlord’s substantial completion of adequate substitution space. On January 25, 2022, the substitution space was substantially completed and the new expiration date was February 28, 2025. During July 2022, we entered into a second amendment of the New York office lease, to add space to the existing premises and increase the annual fixed rent through the existing expiration date. The new fixed rent commenced upon the landlord’s substantial completion of the additional space, which occurred on September 19, 2022. On June 23, 2023, the Company notified the landlord of its election to early terminate the lease effective as of March 31, 2024, pursuant to the terms set forth in the lease. In connection with such early termination election, the Company paid the landlord a termination payment as set forth in the lease. During September 2023, we entered into a fourth amendment of the New York office lease, which provides for (among other things): (a) the surrender a portion of the premises (Unit 602) effective as of March 31, 2024; (b) the rescission of the early termination election as it relates to the remaining portion of the premises (Unit 601); (c) an extension of the lease term with respect to Unit 601 for 40 months commencing on April 1, 2024 and expiring on July 31, 2027; and (d) annual rent increases, with no right to early terminate or extend the lease.

On April 9, 2024, Benchmark entered into a building lease agreement with Luzzatto Oaks, LLC. Pursuant to the lease, Benchmark has leased 2,663 square feet of office space in Austin, Texas. The lease commenced on May 1, 2024. The term

of the lease is 39 months from the commencement date, provides for annual rent increases, and does not provide the right to early terminate or extend the lease terms.

Deflecto leases various land, buildings, offices and equipment. Certain of these leases contain various options to renew and expire at varying dates through December 2031. Leases are executed in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and China. The exercise of lease renewal options is at the Deflecto’s sole discretion. Deflecto regularly evaluates the renewal options and when they are reasonably certain of exercise, Deflecto includes the renewal period in the lease term.

Printronix conducts its foreign and domestic operations using leased facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through November 2026. Leases are executed in the United States, Europe, China, Singapore and Malaysia. Printronix has leased 73,649 square feet of facilities space. Lease term varies and may provide for annual rent increases and provide the right to early termination under certain circumstances or extend the lease.


Balance at	Weighted-Average Remaining Term	Weighted-Average Discount Rate
Balance at December 31, 2023
Operating leases	2.9 years	6	%

Balance at December 31, 2024
Operating leases	3.8 years	6	%
Finance leases	3.2 years	7	%

The Company’s operating lease costs were $1.8 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

The table below presents aggregate future minimum lease payments due under the Company’s leases discussed above, reconciled to long-term lease liabilities and short-term lease liabilities (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities) included in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):


Years Ending December 31,

2025	$	4,120
2026	3,490
2027	1,703
2028	632
2029	598
Thereafter	1,196
Total minimum payments	11,739
Less: short-term lease liabilities	(3,563)
Less: present value discount	(1,398)
Long-term lease liabilities	$	6,778

Inventor Royalties and Contingent Legal Expenses

In connection with the investment in certain patents and patent rights, ARG and its subsidiaries executed related agreements which grant to the former owners of the respective patents or patent rights, the right to receive inventor royalties based on future net revenues (as defined in the respective agreements) generated as a result of licensing and otherwise enforcing the respective patents or patent portfolios.

ARG or its subsidiaries may retain the services of law firms that specialize in patent licensing and enforcement and patent law in connection with their licensing and enforcement activities. These law firms may be retained on a contingent fee basis whereby such law firms are paid on a scaled percentage of any negotiated fees, settlements or judgments awarded based on how and when the fees, settlements or judgments are obtained.

Patent Enforcement and Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to claims, counterclaims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the ultimate liability with respect to these claims and legal actions, if any, will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Subsidiaries of ARG are often required to engage in litigation to enforce their patents and patent rights. In connection with any such patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that a subsidiary has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions. In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against ARG or its subsidiaries or award attorney’s fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material.

On September 6, 2019, Slingshot Technologies, LLC (“Slingshot”), filed a lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court against the Company and ARG (collectively, the “Acacia Entities”), Monarch Networking Solutions LLC (“Monarch”), former Acacia board member Katharine Wolanyk, and Transpacific IP Group, Ltd. (“Transpacific”). Slingshot alleges that the Acacia Entities and Monarch misappropriated its confidential and proprietary information, purportedly furnished to the Acacia Entities and Monarch by Ms. Wolanyk, in acquiring a patent portfolio from Transpacific after Slingshot’s exclusive option to purchase the same patent portfolio from Transpacific had already expired. Slingshot seeks monetary damages, as well as equitable and injunctive relief related to its alleged right to own the portfolio. On March 15, 2021, the Court issued orders granting Monarch’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and Ms. Wolanyk’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The remaining parties served written discovery requests and responses, exchanged their respective document productions, and completed depositions as of October 27, 2022. On November 18, 2022, the Acacia Entities and Transpacific filed motions for summary judgment on Slingshot’s claims. Slingshot filed its opposition to the summary judgment motions on December 23, 2022, and the Acacia Entities and Transpacific filed their replies on January 10, 2023. The Chancery Court removed from the calendar the two-day trial on liability that had been scheduled for April 18–19, 2023, and instead set the hearing on the summary judgment motions for April 19, 2023. On April 19, 2023, the Chancery Court heard oral argument and took the summary judgment motions under advisement. On July 26, 2023, the Court held a telephonic hearing during which it delivered its ruling on the motions for summary judgment. The Court granted Transpacific’s motion and deferred ruling on the Acacia Entities’ motion pending further briefing as to whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction. On September 14, 2023, the Acacia Entities and Slingshot filed a joint submission with the Chancery Court agreeing to proceed in Delaware Superior Court based on the Chancery Court’s apparent lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the remaining claims, and on September 21, 2023, the Chancery Court issued an order transferring the case to Delaware Superior Court. The case was subsequently assigned to Judge Eric M. Davis in the Complex Commercial Litigation Division of the Superior Court. On January 8, 2024, Judge Davis held an initial status conference, during which he instructed the Acacia Entities and Slingshot to refile their respective summary judgment briefs in Superior Court for the Court’s consideration. The oral arguments on the Acacia Entities’ motion for summary judgment took place on March 28, 2024. On June 20, 2024, the Court issued its ruling denying the Acacia Entities’ motion for summary judgment. On October 15, 2024, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, after which they filed a stipulation of dismissal, concluding the litigation. The expenses related to the settlement agreement are included in non-recurring legacy legal expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

In February 2017, AIP Operation LLC, or AIP, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, at the direction of prior management and the Board of Directors at that time, adopted a Profits Interests Plan that granted a profit interest in Veritone 10% Warrants held by AIP to certain members of that management team and the Board of Directors of the Company as compensation for services rendered. Those members of management and the Board separated from Acacia in 2018 and 2019 and the Veritone 10% Warrants were subsequently exercised in 2020 and 2021.

We had been engaged in a dispute involving those former executives’ profit interests in AIP (the “AIP Matter”) and on August 2, 2024 the AIP Matter was settled, which resulted in a $14.5 million payment by Acacia during the year ended December 31, 2024. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2024, non-recurring legacy legal expense includes an aggregate additional expense of $12.9 million, which is incremental to amounts expensed in prior periods.

Guarantees and Indemnifications

Acacia and certain of Acacia’s operating subsidiaries have made guarantees and indemnities under which they may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions, including revenue transactions in the ordinary course of business. In connection with certain facility leases, Acacia and certain of its operating subsidiaries have indemnified lessors for certain claims arising from the facilities or the leases. Acacia indemnifies its

directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. However, Acacia has a directors and officers insurance policy that may reduce its exposure in certain circumstances and may enable it to recover a portion of future amounts that may be payable, if any. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies and, in many cases is indefinite but subject to statute of limitations. The majority of guarantees and indemnities do not provide any limitations of the maximum potential future payments that Acacia could be obligated to make. To date, Acacia has made no material payments related to these guarantees and indemnities. Acacia estimates the fair value of its indemnification obligations to be immaterial based on this history and therefore, have not recorded any material liability for these guarantees and indemnities in the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, no events or transactions have occurred that would result in a material liability as of December 31, 2024.

Printronix posted collateral in the form of a surety bond or other similar instruments, which are issued by independent insurance carriers (the “Surety”), to cover the risk of loss related to certain customs and employment activities. If any of the entities that hold such bonds should require payment from the Surety, Printronix would be obligated to indemnify and reimburse the Surety for all costs incurred. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, Printronix had approximately $100,000 of these bonds outstanding.

Environmental Cleanup

Energy Operations

Benchmark is engaged in oil and natural gas exploration and production and may become subject to certain liabilities as they relate to environmental cleanup of well production and also may become subject to certain liabilities as they relate to environmental cleanup of well sites or other environmental restoration procedures as they relate to oil and natural gas wells and the operation thereof. In connection with Benchmark’s acquisition of existing or previously drilled well bores, Benchmark may not be aware of what environmental safeguards were taken at the time such wells were drilled or during such time the wells were operated. Should it be determined that a liability exists with respect to any environmental cleanup or restoration, Benchmark would be responsible for curing such a violation. No claim has been made, nor is management aware of any liability that exists, as it relates to any environmental cleanup, restoration, or the violation of any rules or regulations relating thereto for the year ended December 31, 2024.