XML 26 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract] 
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Patent Enforcement and Other Litigation

Acacia is subject to claims, counterclaims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business.  Management believes that the ultimate liability with respect to these claims and legal actions, if any, will not have a material effect on Acacia's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  Certain of Acacia's operating subsidiaries are often required to engage in litigation to enforce their patents and patent rights.  In connection with any of Acacia's operating subsidiaries' patent enforcement actions, it is possible that a defendant may request and/or a court may rule that an operating subsidiary has violated statutory authority, regulatory authority, federal rules, local court rules, or governing standards relating to the substantive or procedural aspects of such enforcement actions.  In such event, a court may issue monetary sanctions against Acacia or its operating subsidiaries or award attorney's fees and/or expenses to a defendant(s), which could be material.
 
Creative Internet Advertising Corporation ("CIAC"), an operating subsidiary of Acacia, received a $12,451,000 million final judgment stemming from its May 2009 trial verdict and corresponding damages award in its patent infringement lawsuit with Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! Inc. appealed the verdict, and in April 2011, a three Judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed the District Court's judgment of infringement in a 2 to 1 decision.

In 2009, CIAC purchased a specific contingency insurance policy under which the insurer agreed to indemnify CIAC for covered losses incurred as a result of a final adjudication entered in the underlying litigation which resulted in a revised final judgment amount that was less than the $12,451,000 final judgment covered under the policy (hereinafter referred to as "verdict insurance"). As a result of the reversal of the District Court's judgment, in September 2011, CIAC submitted a claim under the insurance policy and received $12,451,000 in verdict insurance proceeds. Verdict insurance proceeds related costs include $2,887,000 of inventor royalties, $3,966,000 of contingent legal fees and $808,000 in other costs associated with the verdict insurance policy and related proceeds received.