XML 59 R29.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 20 - Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
NOTE 20.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be receivable from selling that asset or payable to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are independent, knowledgeable, able to transact and willing to transact.

FASB Codification Topic 820: Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair values hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 InputsUnadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Examples of financial instruments generally included in this level are U.S. Treasury securities, equity and trust preferred securities that trade in active markets and listed derivative instruments.

Level 2 InputsInputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means. Examples of financial instruments generally included in this level are corporate debt, mortgage-backed certificates issued by U.S. government corporations and government-sponsored enterprises, equity securities that trade in less active markets and certain derivative instruments.

Level 3 InputsUnobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own judgments about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. Examples of financial instruments generally included in this level are private equities, certain loans held for sale and other alternative investments.

In general, fair value of securities is based upon quoted market prices, where available (Level 1 inputs). If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon market prices determined by an outside, independent entity that primarily uses as inputs observable market-based parameters (Level 2 inputs). Fair value of loans held for sale is based upon internally developed models that primarily use as inputs observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the Company’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters (Level 3 inputs). Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be

indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with those of other mar­ket participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Securities available for sale. Securities classified as available for sale are generally reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. Investments in fixed income securities, exclusive of preferred stock and mortgage-backed securities, are valued based on evaluations provided by Interactive Data Corporation (“IDC”), a leading global provider of market data information. IDC evaluations represent an exit price or their opinion as to what a buyer would pay for a security, typically in an institutional round lot position in a current sale. IDC seeks to utilize market data and observations in its evaluation service, and gives priority to observable benchmark yields and reported trades. IDC utilizes evaluated pricing techniques that vary by asset class and incorporate available market information; because many fixed income securities do not trade on a daily basis, IDC applies available information through processes such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of similar securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. Model processes such as option-adjusted spread models are used to value securities that have prepayment features. Substantially all securities available for sale evaluated in this manner are deemed to be Level 2 valuations.

For mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government corporations and government-sponsored enterprises, management considers dealer indicative bids in the valuation process. Indicative bids are estimates of value and do not necessarily represent the price at which the dealer would be willing to transact. Such bids are compared to IDC-evaluated prices for reasonableness as well as consistency with observable market conditions. All mortgage-backed securities are deemed to be valued based on Level 2 inputs.

Publicly traded common and preferred stocks are valued by reference to the market closing price (last trade) on the measurement date (Level 1 inputs). In the unlikely event that no trade occurred on the measurement date, reference would be made to an indicative bid or the last trade most proximate to the measurement date (Level 2 inputs).

The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value. There were no financial liabilities measured at fair value.

   
Level 1 Inputs
   
Level 2 Inputs
   
Level 3 Inputs
     
Total
Fair Value
 
December 31, 2012
                         
Securities available for sale:
                         
U.S. Treasury securities
  $ 6,386     $     $    
  6,386
 
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and government-sponsored enterprises
                               
Residential mortgage-backed securities
          25,006              25,006  
Agency notes
          1,231              1,231  
Total obligations of U.S. government corporations and government-sponsored enterprises
          26,237              26,237  
Obligations of state and political institutions—New York bank qualified
          17,923              17,923  
Single-issuer, trust preferred securities
    38,885                    38,885  
Other preferred securities
    11,953                    11,953  
Corporate debt securities
          174,418              174,418  
Equity and other securities
    21,035                    21,035  
Total marketable securities
  $ 78,259     $ 218,578     $     $ 296,837  

                                 
December 31, 2011
                               
Securities available for sale:
                               
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and government-sponsored enterprises
                               
Residential mortgage-backed securities
  $     $ 29,752     $    
$
 29,752  
Agency notes
          1,237             1,237  
Total obligations of U.S. government corporations and government-sponsored enterprises
          30,989             30,989  
Obligations of state and political institutions—New York bank qualified
          22,777             22,777  
Single-issuer, trust preferred securities
    27,059                   27,059  
Corporate debt securities
          173,307             173,307  
Equity and other securities
    15,882                   15,882  
Total marketable securities
  $ 42,941     $ 227,073     $     $ 270,014  

Certain financial assets, such as collateral-dependent impaired loans are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The following table summarizes the period end fair value of financial assets, based on significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs, measured on a non-recurring basis:

   
December 31,
2012
   
December 31,
2011
 
Impaired loans
           
 Commercial and industrial
  $     $ 1,298  
 Commercial real estate
    395       2,011  
Other real estate owned, net
    1,452       1,929  

Impaired loans. At the time a loan is considered impaired, it is valued at the lower of cost or fair value. Impaired loans carried at fair value may receive specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses. For collateral dependent loans, fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.

Other real estate owned. Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third-party appraisals of the property utilizing a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.

Impaired loans that are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a principal balance of $0.7 million, with a valuation allowance of $0.3 million at December 31, 2012. There was no additional provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2011, impaired loans had a principal balance of $4.5 million, with a valuation allowance of $1.2 million, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $31 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Other real estate owned measured at fair value less costs to sell had a net carrying amount of $1.5 million, which is made up of the outstanding balance of $1.5 million, net of a valuation allowance of $-0- million. For the year ended December 31, 2012, $-0- million of other real estate owned was written down through a charge to noninterest expense. At December 31, 2011, other real estate owned had a net carrying amount of $1.9 million, made up of the outstanding balance of $1.9 million, net of a valuation allowance of $-0- thousand. For the year ended December 31, 2011, $-0- million of other real estate owned was written down through a charge to noninterest expense.

For those financial instruments that are not recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, but are measured at fair value for disclosure purposes, management follows the same fair value measurement principles and guidance as for instruments recorded at fair value.

Much of the information used to arrive at “fair value” is highly subjective and judgmental in nature and therefore the results may not be precise. The subjective factors include, among other things, estimated cash flows, risk characteristics, credit quality and interest rates, all of which are subject to change. With the exception of investment securities and certain long-term debt, the Company’s financial instruments are not readily marketable and market prices do not exist. Since negotiated prices for the instruments that are not readily marketable depend greatly on the motivation of the buyer and seller, the amounts that will actually be realized or paid per settlement or maturity of these instruments could be significantly different.

In particular, fair value estimates are made at a point in time, based on relevant market data as well as the best information available about the financial instrument. Illiquid credit markets have resulted in inactive markets for certain of the Company’s financial instruments. As a result, there is no or limited observable market data for these assets and liabilities. Fair value estimates for financial instruments for which no or limited observable market data is available are based on our judgments regarding current economic conditions, liquidity discounts, currency, credit, and interest rate risks, loss experience and other factors, all of which are Level 3 inputs as discussed above. These estimates involve significant judgments and uncertainties and cannot be substantiated by comparison to quoted prices in active markets and cannot be determined with precision. As a result, such calculated fair value estimates may not be realizable in a current sale or immediate settlement of the instrument. In addition, there are inherent uncertainties in any fair value measurement tech­nique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used in the fair value measurement technique, including discount rates, liquidity risks, and estimates of future cash flows, could ­significantly affect these fair value estimates.

A description of the methods, factors and significant assumptions utilized in estimating the fair values for significant categories of financial instruments follows:

Financial Instruments with Carrying Amounts Equal to Fair Value

The carrying amounts for cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with other banks, accrued interest receivable, Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper, other short-term borrowings, and accrued interest payable, as a result of their short-term nature, are considered to approximate fair value.

Investment Securities

The methods, factors and significant assumptions used to estimate fair values of all securities are described more fully beginning on page 103.

Loans, Net

The fair value of loans held in portfolio which reprice within 90 days reflecting changes in the base rate approximate their carrying amount. For other loans held in portfolio, the fair value is calculated based on discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality and for similar maturities. These calculations have been adjusted for credit risk based on the Company’s historical credit loss experience.

The fair value for secured nonaccrual loans is the value of the underlying collateral which is sufficient to repay each loan. For other nonaccrual loans, the fair value represents book value less a credit risk adjustment based on the Company’s historical credit loss experience.

The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.

Deposits

FASB Codification Topic 825: Financial Instruments requires that the fair value of demand, savings, NOW (Negotiable Order of Withdrawal) and certain money market deposits be equal to their carrying amount. The Company believes that the fair value of these deposits, including the value of deposit relationships, is greater than that prescribed by FASB Codification Topic 825.

For other types of deposits with fixed maturities, fair value has been estimated based upon interest rates currently being offered on deposits with similar characteristics and maturities.

Advances—FHLB and Long-Term Borrowings

For advances—FHLB and long-term borrowings, the fair value is calculated based on discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being quoted for debt with similar characteristics and maturities.

Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit and Financial Guarantees

The fees received for the issuance of commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees, are considered to approximate fair value. Due to the uncertainty involved in attempting to assess the likelihood and timing of a commitment being drawn upon, coupled with the lack of an established market and the wide diversity of fee structures, the Company does not believe it is meaningful to provide an estimate of fair value that differs from the amount of consideration received.

The following is a summary of the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2012 or 2011.

   
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012
 
   
Carrying
Value
   
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
 
Level 3
   
Total
 
FINANCIAL ASSETS
                             
Cash and due from banks
  $ 38,944     $ 38,944     $     $     $ 38,944  
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
    112,886       112,886                   112,886  
Investment securities
    683,245       78,259       621,796             700,055  
Loans, net
    1,748,643                   1,762,431       1,762,431  
Accrued interest receivable
    6,853       520       4,193       2,140       6,853  
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
                                       
Demand, NOW, savings and money market deposits
    1,626,043       1,626,043                   1,626,043  
Time deposits
    642,041             643,625             643,625  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    32,950       32,950                   32,950  
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings
    15,345       15,345                   15,345  
Accrued interest payable
    649       105       544             649  
Advances—FHLB and long-term borrowings
    127,039       100,000       1,275       27,211       128,486  

   
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011
 
   
Carrying
Value
   
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
 
Level 3
   
Total
 
FINANCIAL ASSETS
                             
Cash and due from banks
  $ 31,046     $ 31,046     $     $     $ 31,046  
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks
    126,448       126,448                   126,448  
Investment securities
    677,871       42,941       652,848             695,789  
Loans, net
    1,496,652                   1,505,005       1,505,005  
Accrued interest receivable
    6,838       377       4,732       1,729       6,838  
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
                                       
Demand, NOW, savings and money market deposits
    1,331,223       1,331,223                   1,331,223  
Time deposits
    657,848             659,439             659,439  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    52,313       52,313                   52,313  
Commercial paper and other short-term borrowings
    13,485       13,485                   13,485  
Accrued interest payable
    1,064       135       929             1,064  
Advances—FHLB and long-term borrowings
    148,507       100,000       22,886       26,170       149,056