XML 101 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
7.   Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
The Company performs an annual impairment test of its goodwill on September 30 of each fiscal year unless interim indicators of impairment exist. Goodwill is considered to be impaired when the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flow methodology. Discounted cash flows are based on the businesses’ strategic plans and management’s best estimate of revenue growth and gross profit by each reporting unit. The Company recorded charges for the impairment of goodwill at March 31, 2009. The Company performed its goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, and determined that no adjustment to goodwill was necessary.
 
The Company experienced a weakness in demand for its products from the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 through the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. In response to this downturn, management restructured the business, which resulted in a change in reporting units and operating segments. The Company reallocated goodwill to each of its newly formed reporting units as of March 31, 2009, based on such factors as the relative fair values of each reporting unit. Goodwill was reallocated to five of the Company’s seven reporting units as of March 31, 2009. This reallocation, in conjunction with a continued downturn in the semiconductor markets indicated that a potential impairment may exist. As such, the Company tested goodwill and other long-lived assets for impairment at March 31, 2009.
 
The Company determined the fair value of each reporting unit as of March 31, 2009 using the Income Approach, specifically the DCF Method. The material assumptions used in the DCF Method include: discount rates and revenue forecasts. Discount rates are based on a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), which represents the average rate a business must pay its providers of debt and equity capital. The WACC used to test goodwill is derived from a group of comparable companies. The average WACC used in the March 31, 2009 reallocation of goodwill was 16.2%. Management determines revenue forecasts based on its best estimate of near term revenue expectations which are corroborated by communications with customers, and longer-term projection trends, which are validated by published independent industry analyst reports. Revenue forecasts materially impact the amount of cash flow generated during the five year discrete cash flow period, and also impact the terminal value as that value is derived from projected revenue. The revenue forecasts used in the reallocation and assessment of goodwill as of March 31, 2009 were decreased from previously forecasted levels due to further market deterioration.
 
For three of the five reporting units containing goodwill at March 31, 2009, the Company determined that the carrying amount of their net assets exceeded their respective fair values, indicating that a potential impairment existed for each of those three reporting units. After completing the required steps of the goodwill impairment test, a goodwill impairment of $71.8 million was recorded as of March 31, 2009.
 
Under GAAP, the Company is required to test certain long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present. The Company determined that impairment indicators were present for certain of our long-lived assets as of March 31, 2009. The long-lived assets in question were tested for recoverability by comparing the sum of the undiscounted cash flows attributable to each respective asset group to their carrying amounts, which resulted in the determination that the carrying amounts were not recoverable. The fair values of each potentially impaired long-lived asset group were then evaluated to determine the amount of the impairment, if any. The fair value of each intangible asset was based primarily on an income approach, which is a present value technique used to measure the fair value of future cash flows produced by the asset. The Company estimated future cash flows over the remaining useful life of each intangible asset, which ranged from approximately 3 to 8 years, and used a discount rate of approximately 16%. As a result of this analysis, management determined that an impairment loss of $35.1 million had occurred as of March 31, 2009, and allocated that loss among the long-lived assets of the impaired asset group based on the carrying value of each asset, with no asset reduced below its respective fair value. The impairment charge was allocated as follows: $19.6 million related to completed technology intangible assets; $1.2 million to trade name intangible assets; $13.4 million to customer relationship intangible assets and $0.9 million to property, plant and equipment. Further, during the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded an additional impairment charge of $0.4 million for property, plant and equipment related to the closure and outsourcing of a small manufacturing operation located in the United States. The total impairment charges related to long-lived assets for fiscal 2009 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
         
    Year Ended
 
    September 30,
 
    2009  
 
Reported as cost of sales:
       
Completed technology intangible asset impairment
  $ 19,608  
Property, plant and equipment impairment
    1,316  
         
Subtotal, reported as cost of sales
    20,924  
         
Reported as operating expense:
       
Trade name intangible asset impairment
    1,145  
Customer relationship intangible asset impairment
    13,443  
         
Subtotal, reported as operating expense
    14,588  
         
    $ 35,512  
         
 
The components of the Company’s goodwill by business segment at September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Brooks
    Brooks
    Brooks
                   
    Products
    Global
    Life Science
    Contract
             
    Solutions     Services     Systems     Manufacturing     Other     Total  
 
Gross goodwill at September 30, 2009
  $ 485,844     $ 151,238     $     $ 18,593     $ 7,421     $ 663,096  
Acquisitions and adjustments during fiscal 2010
                                   
                                                 
Gross goodwill at September 30, 2010
    485,844       151,238             18,593       7,421       663,096  
Acquisitions and adjustments during fiscal 2011
                36,589                   36,589  
                                                 
Gross goodwill at September 30, 2011
  $ 485,844     $ 151,238     $ 36,589     $ 18,593     $ 7,421     $ 699,685  
                                                 
Accumulated goodwill impairments at September 30, 2009
  $ (437,706 )   $ (151,238 )   $     $ (18,593 )   $ (7,421 )   $ (614,958 )
Impairments recorded during fiscal 2010
                                   
                                                 
Accumulated goodwill impairments at September 30, 2010
    (437,706 )     (151,238 )           (18,593 )     (7,421 )     (614,958 )
Impairments recorded during fiscal 2011
                                   
                                                 
Accumulated goodwill impairments at September 30, 2011
  $ (437,706 )   $ (151,238 )   $     $ (18,593 )   $ (7,421 )   $ (614,958 )
                                                 
Goodwill, less accumulated impairments at September 30, 2010
  $ 48,138     $     $     $     $     $ 48,138  
                                                 
Goodwill, less accumulated impairments at September 30, 2011
  $ 48,138     $     $ 36,589     $     $     $ 84,727  
                                                 
 
Components of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                                 
    September 30, 2011     September 30, 2010  
          Accumulated
    Net Book
          Accumulated
    Net Book
 
    Cost     Amortization     Value     Cost     Amortization     Value  
 
Patents
  $ 7,808     $ 6,989     $ 819     $ 7,808     $ 6,886     $ 922  
Completed technology
    50,975       39,235       11,740       43,502       37,108       6,394  
Trademarks and trade names
    3,941       3,719       222       3,779       3,379       400  
Customer relationships
    49,029       17,496       31,533       18,860       15,453       3,407  
                                                 
    $ 111,753     $ 67,439     $ 44,314     $ 73,949     $ 62,826     $ 11,123  
                                                 
 
In connection with the acquisitions of Nexus and RTS during fiscal year 2011, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to the following intangible assets: Completed Technology — $7.5 million, Customer Relationships - $31.6 million and Trademarks and Trade Names — $0.2 million. For details regarding these intangible assets see Note 3. These intangible assets will support the products and services provided by the Brooks Life Science Systems segment.
 
During fiscal year 2010, the Company acquired certain patents and other intellectual property from an entity that had ceased operations. This intellectual property supports certain products in the Company’s Brooks Product Solutions segment. The total cost of this property was $0.9 million, and this cost will be amortized to cost of sales over a ten year life.
 
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $4.6 million, $3.9 million and $10.2 million for the years ended September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Estimated future amortization expense for the intangible assets recorded by the Company as of September 30, 2011 is as follows (in millions):
 
         
Year ended September 30,
       
2012
  $ 7.8  
2013
    5.9  
2014
    5.2  
2015
    5.1  
2016
    4.5  
Thereafter
    15.8  
         
    $ 44.3