Contingencies (Notes)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2019

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Contingencies

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company, along with our subsidiaries, is party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We reserve for loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. We regularly monitor developments related to these legal proceedings, and review the adequacy of our legal reserves on a quarterly basis. We do not expect these losses to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements if and when such losses are incurred.

We are subject to unclaimed property audits by states in the ordinary course of business. The property subject to review in the audit process include unclaimed wages, vendor payments and customer refunds. State escheat laws generally require entities to report and remit abandoned and unclaimed property to the state. Failure to timely report and remit the property can result in assessments that could include interest and penalties, in addition to the payment of the escheat liability itself. We routinely remit escheat payments to states in compliance with applicable escheat laws.

Blair v. Rent-A-Center, Inc. This matter is a state-wide class action complaint originally filed on March 13, 2017 in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges various claims, including that our cash sales and total

rent to own prices exceed the pricing permitted under the Karnette Rental-Purchase Act. Following a court-ordered mediation on March 28, 2019, we reached an agreement in principle to settle this matter for a total of $13 million, including attorneys’ fees. The settlement was approved by the court in October 2019. We have denied any liability in the settlement and agreed to the settlement in order to avoid additional expensive, time-consuming litigation. We recorded the pre-tax charge for this settlement in the first quarter of 2019, and the settlement amount will be paid in November 2019.

Velma Russell v. Acceptance Now. This purported class action arising out of calls made by Acceptance Now to customers’ reference(s) was filed on January 29, 2019 in Massachusetts state court. Specifically, plaintiffs seek to certify a class representing any references of customers (within the state of Massachusetts) during the 4 years prior to the filing date that were contacted by Acceptance Now more frequently during a 12 month period than is permitted by Massachusetts state law. The plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief and statutory damages of $25 per reference which may be tripled to $75 per reference. References are not parties to our consumer arbitration agreement. We operate 12 Acceptance Now locations in Massachusetts. Discovery has commenced and a mediation took place in September 2019. We intend to continue to vigorously defend these claims, however, we cannot assure you that we will be found to have no liability in this matter.

Federal Trade Commission civil investigative demand. In April 2019, along with other rent-to-own companies, we received a civil investigative demand from the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") seeking information regarding certain transactions involving the purchase and sale of customer lease agreements, and whether such transactions violated the FTC Act. Although we believe such transactions were in compliance with the FTC Act, this inquiry could lead to an enforcement action and/or a consent order, and substantial costs. The Company has provided substantial information in response to this inquiry and continues to work with the FTC to resolve this matter.