XML 34 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS/LIABILITIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS/LIABILITIES  
DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS/LIABILITIES

NOTE 15 – DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS/LIABILITIES

Deferred Income tax assets and liabilities, net and the actions for recourse tax receivable are presented below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 

 

    

2020

    

2019

Tax carryforward

 

(11,467)

 

(11,695)

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

(2,909)

 

(2,061)

Provisions

 

(1,472)

 

(2,082)

PP&E and Intangible assets

 

74,104

 

70,687

Cash dividends from foreign companies

 

588

 

701

Income tax inflation adjustment effect

 

21,340

 

16,808

Other deferred tax liabilities (assets), net

 

(40)

 

(23)

Total deferred tax liabilities, net

 

80,144

 

72,335

Actions for recourse tax receivable

 

(882)

 

(1,185)

Total deferred tax liability, net

 

(*)  79,262

 

71,150

 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

 

(412)

 

(399)

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

79,674

 

71,549


(*)  Includes $82 of currency translation adjustments on foreign subsidiaries’ initial balances.

 

As of December 31, 2020, the Company and some subsidiaries have a cumulative Tax carryforward of approximately $45,866, that calculated considering statutory income tax rate, represent a deferred tax asset of approximately $11,467.

The detail of the maturities of estimated tax carryforward is disclosed:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Tax carryforward 

    

Tax carryforward amount 

    

Tax carryforward 

Company

 

generation year

 

as of 12.31.2020

 

expiration year

Inter Radios

 

2017

 

3

 

2022

Inter Radios

 

2018

 

2

 

2023

Telemás (*)

 

2019

 

448

 

2024

Micro Sistemas

 

2020

 

20

 

2025

Telecom Argentina

 

2018

 

21,368

 

2023

Telecom Argentina

 

2019

 

19,275

 

2024

Telecom Argentina

 

2020

 

4,750

 

2025

 

 

 

 

45,866

 

 


(*)  This company is consolidated in the financial statements of Adesol.

 

Income tax (expense) benefit differed from the amounts computed by applying the Company’s statutory income tax rate to pre-tax income as a result of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years ended December 31, 

 

 

    

2020

    

2019

    

2018

 

 

 

Profit (loss)

 

Pre-tax income

 

3,147

 

13,997

 

5,651

 

Non-taxable items – (Earnings) losses from associates

 

(496)

 

255

 

(494)

 

Non-taxable items – Costs valuation differences of foreign investments

 

(6,570)

 

(14,353)

 

 —

 

Non-taxable items – Other

 

(1,501)

 

(1,081)

 

(580)

 

Restatement in current currency of Equity, goodwill and other

 

62,187

 

99,307

 

75,459

 

Subtotal

 

56,767

 

98,125

 

80,036

 

Weighted statutory income tax rate

 

24.59

%

26.14

%

25.37

%

Income tax expense at weighted statutory tax rate

 

(13,958)

 

(25,655)

 

(20,303)

 

Deferred tax liability restatement in current currency and other

 

20,698

 

27,023

 

26,287

 

Income tax inflation adjustment

 

(14,842)

 

(20,685)

 

 —

 

Actions for recourse

 

12

 

71

 

92

 

Income tax on cash dividends of foreign companies

 

(161)

 

(44)

 

(133)

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(8,251)

 

(19,290)

 

5,943

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current tax expense

 

(241)

 

(218)

 

 —

 

Deferred tax (expense) benefit

 

(8,010)

 

(19,072)

 

5,943

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(8,251)

 

(19,290)

 

5,943

 

 

Income tax - Actions for recourse filed with the Tax Authority

Section 10 of Law No. 23,928 and Section 39 of Law No. 24,073 suspended the application of the provisions of Title VI of the Income Tax Law relating to the income tax inflation adjustment since April 1, 1992.

Accordingly, Telecom Argentina determined its income tax obligations in accordance to those provisions, without considering the income tax inflation adjustment.

After the economic crisis of 2002, many taxpayers began to question the legality of the provisions suspending the income tax inflation adjustment. Also, the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice issued its verdict in the "Candy" case July 3, 2009 in which it stated that particularly for fiscal year 2002 and considering the serious state of disturbance of that year, the taxpayer could demonstrate that not applying the income tax inflation adjustment resulted in confiscatory income tax rates.

More recently, the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice applied a similar criterion to the 2010, 2011. 2012 and 2014 fiscal years in the cases brought by "Distribuidora Gas del Centro" (10/14/14, 06/02/15, 10/04/16 and 06/25/19), among others, enabling the application of income tax inflation adjustment for periods not affected by a severe economic crisis such as 2002.

According to the above-mentioned new legal background that the Company took knowledge during 2015, Telecom Argentina filed during 2015 to 2020 actions for recourse with the AFIP to claim the full tax overpaid for fiscal years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 for a total amount of approximately $1,261 plus interest, under the argument that the lack of application of the income tax inflation adjustment is confiscatory.

On September 24, 2019 Telecom was notified of the resolutions dated September 12, 2019 and August 30, 2019 in which the AFIP has rejected the actions for recourse corresponding to fiscal years 2009 and 2010 respectively. Also, on November 11, 2019 Telecom was notified of the resolutions dated October 29, 2019 in which the AFIP has rejected the actions for recourse corresponding to fiscal years 2011 and 2012. According to this, on October 15, 2019 and on December 3, 2019, Telecom filed four actions for recourse before the National Court of First Instance, since the Company's Management, with the assistance of its tax advisors, understands that the arguments presented by the Company follow the same criteria as those considered by the Supreme Court of Argentina in similar precedents, among others. Therefore, the Company should obtain a favorable resolution to such claims.

Consequently, the income tax determined in excess qualifies as a tax credit in compliance with IAS 12 and the Company recorded a non-current tax credit of $882 as of December 31, 2020. For the measurement and update of the tax credit, the Company has estimated the amount of the tax determined in excess for the years 2009-2017 weighting the likelihood of certain variables according to the jurisprudential antecedents known as of the date of these consolidated financial statements. The Company’s Management will assess Tax Authority’s resolutions related to actions of recourse filed as well as the jurisprudence evolution in order to, at least annually, remeasure the tax credit recorded.