10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 0-26824

COLLABRX, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	68-0370244
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

44 Montgomery Street,  Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94104

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 (415) 248-5350

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Sec.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes þNo o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer“, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer   o	Accelerated Filer  o
Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes oNo þ

As of August 6, 2013, there were 1,952,960 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.

COLLABRX, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES

Formerly TEGAL CORPORATION

INDEX

		Page
	PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of  June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26
	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	26
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	26
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	37
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	37
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	37
Item 5.	Other Information	37
Item 6.	Exhibits	37
Signatures		37

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

COLLABRX, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES

Formerly TEGAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share data)

	June 30,			March 31,
	2013			2013 *
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,424		$	4,039
Accounts receivable		270			250
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		199			102
Other assets of discontinued operations		--			11
Total current assets		3,893			4,402
Property and equipment, net		139			142
Intangible assets, net		1,438			1,490
Goodwill		603			603
Investment in convertible promissory note		353			345
Total assets	$	6,426		$	6,982
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	208		$	167
Common stock warrant liability		7			10
Liabilities of discontinued operations		--			16
Total current liabilities		215			193
Deferred tax liability		561			581
Promissory note		505			504
Other long term liabilities		12			-
Total liabilities		1,293			1,278
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		--			--
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;   1,952,960 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively		19			19
Additional paid-in capital		130,686			130,602
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		--			(142	)
Accumulated deficit		(125,572	)		(124,775	)
Total stockholders’ equity		5,133			5,704
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6,426		$	6,982

*   Derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

COLLABRX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Formerly TEGAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Revenue	$	270		$	--
Revenue - related party		--			25
Total revenue		270			25
Cost of revenue		18			--
Gross profit		252			25
Operating expenses:
Engineering		213			--
Research and development		130			--
Sales and marketing		59			--
General and administrative		559			712
Total operating expenses		961			712
Operating loss		(709	)		(687	)
Other income, net		10			9
Loss before income tax benefit		(699	)		(678	)
Income tax benefit		(20	)		--
Loss from continuing operations		(679	)		(678	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(118	)		(1	)
Net loss		(797	)		(679	)
Foreign currency translation		--			--
Comprehensive loss	$	(797	)	$	(679	)
Net loss per share from continuing operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.35	)	$	(0.40	)
Net loss per share from discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.00	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.40	)
Weighted-average shares used in per share computation:
Basic and diluted		1,953			1,689

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

COLLABRX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Formerly TEGAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(797	)	$	(679	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock compensation expense		84			54
Fair value adjustment of common stock warrants		(3	)		(1	)
Depreciation		7			3
Amortization of intangible assets		52			--
Accrued interest note receivable		(8	)		(8	)
Accrued interest promissory note		1			--
Tax benefit related to intangibles		(20	)		--
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(20	)		--
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(97	)		37
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		53			(102	)
Current assets and liabilities from discontinued operations		137			367
Net cash used in operating activities		(611	)		(329	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment		(4	)		--
Issuance of note receivable		--			(300	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(4	)		(300	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(615	)		(629	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		4,039			7,820
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	3,424		$	7,191

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

COLLABRX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Formerly TEGAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(All amounts in thousands, except share and per share data, unless otherwise noted)

1.Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

CollabRx, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CollabRx,” the “Company” or “we,” “us,” and “our”), is the recently renamed Tegal Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Tegal”), which acquired a private company of the same name on July 12, 2012.  Following approval by its stockholders on September 25, 2012, Tegal amended its charter and changed its name to “CollabRx, Inc.” (the “Name Change”).

Tegal was formed in December 1989 to acquire the operations of the former Tegal Corporation, a division of Motorola, Inc.  Tegal’s predecessor company was founded in 1972 and acquired by Motorola, Inc. in 1978. Tegal completed its initial public offering in October 1995.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.  We incurred net losses of $797 and $679 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  We used $611 and $329 of cash in operating activities for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be adequate to fund operations through fiscal year 2014.

CollabRx offers cloud-based expert systems that provide clinically relevant interpretive knowledge to institutions, physicians, researchers and patients for genomics-based medicine in cancer and other diseases to inform health care decision-making.  Our reference to the “cloud” is meant that a product or service can be delivered via the Internet, usually on a pay-for-use or subscription basis, versus the purchase and installation of enterprise-based software, which typically requires investments in both software and hardware, often also requiring large-scale customization efforts. With access to approximately 75 clinical and scientific advisors at leading academic institutions and a suite of tools and processes that combine artificial intelligence-based analytics with proprietary interpretive content, the Company is well positioned to participate in the value-added “big data” opportunity in the US health care.  We use the term “big data” to refer to datasets whose size is beyond the ability of typical database software tools to capture, store, manage, and analyze.

The physicians and researchers within our network of advisors have agreed to participate in our efforts for an indefinite term, on an uncompensated basis, and without a formal agreement.  The board assignments, biographies and current affiliations of all of our advisors are posted on our website.  

Discontinued Operations

Since 2009, the Company has engaged in a process of transitioning away from its legacy lines of business in semiconductor capital equipment. As a result of the sale of the Company’s Deep Reactive Ion Etch (“DRIE”) assets in the fiscal year 2011, and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the DRIE business operations related to the designing, manufacturing, marketing and servicing of systems and parts within the semiconductor industry has been presented in discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated financial statements.   The exit from the DRIE operation was essentially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of our 2011 fiscal year.  However, the Company retained its intellectual property portfolio for Nanolayer Deposition Technology (“NLD”).  During fiscal year 2012, the Company, as part of its proposed sale of its NLD portfolio, completed the sale transactions of two of four patent lots for approximately $3,750.  The Company continues to market the remaining lots to independent third parties.

The Company recognized a reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and into Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes.  The reclassification is related to the recognition of a non-cash loss of $142 of foreign exchange differences from its former Tegal foreign subsidiaries, primarily as a result of the final closing of the former Tegal German subsidiary.   The Company received permission to close the German subsidiary in June 2013.  No further audits or reviews are anticipated by foreign taxing authorities.

6

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the March 31, 2013 audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the information set forth herein.  The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), but omit certain information and footnote disclosures necessary to present the financial statements in accordance with GAAP.  These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.  The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could vary from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments.  The Company’s accounts receivable balance is also subject to credit risk. Substantially all of the Company’s liquid investments are invested in money market funds. The Company’s accounts receivable are derived primarily from sales to customers located in the United States.  The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally requires no collateral. The Company no longer maintains reserves for potential credit losses. There have been no write-offs during the periods presented.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, Sequel Power, LLC (“Sequel Power”) accounted for all the Company’s revenue.  As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2013, Life Technologies and Everyday Health accounted for 93% and 7%, respectively, of the Company’s revenue and accounts receivable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments having a maturity of three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

At June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, all of the Company’s current investments are classified as cash equivalents in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 the fair value of the Company’s investments approximated cost.

Promissory Notes

On July 12, 2012, Tegal completed the acquisition of CollabRx.  As part of the purchase price, Tegal issued promissory notes in the amount of $500 in exchange for the existing CollabRx indebtedness.  The principal amount of the promissory notes is payable in equal installments on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of issuance, along with the accrued but unpaid interest as of such dates.  See Note 8, CollabRx Acquisition.

On November 22, 2011, the Company completed a $300 strategic investment in NanoVibronix, Inc., (“NanoVibronix”) a private company that develops medical devices and products that implement its proprietary therapeutic ultrasound technology.  The Company’s investment in NanoVibronix is in the form of a convertible promissory note that bears interest at a rate of 10% per year compounded annually and matures on November 15, 2014.  Principal and accrued interest under the convertible promissory note automatically converts into shares of Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of NanoVibronix upon the earlier to occur of (i) a $3,000 (or larger) equity financing by NanoVibronix or (ii) a sale of NanoVibronix.  In addition, the Company may convert principal and accrued interest under the convertible promissory note into shares of NanoVibronix Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock at its election at any time.  In either case, the conversion price is $0.284 per share.

As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the Convertible Promissory Note balance was $353 and $345, respectively, consisting of the original $300 investment and $53 and $45, respectively, in accrued interest.

7

Accounts Receivable – Allowance for Sales Returns and Doubtful Accounts

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the Company had zero reserves for potential credit losses as such risk was determined to be immaterial. The Company had zero write-offs during the periods presented.  The Company historically maintained an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of the Company’s customers to make required payments for system sales.

Revenue Recognition

Each contract sale of our interpretive data is evaluated individually in regard to revenue recognition.  We have integrated in our evaluation the related guidance included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605 – “Revenue Recognition”. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

For arrangements that include multiple deliverables, we identify separate units of accounting based on the guidance under ASC 605-25 “Multiple Element Arrangements”, which provides that revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting, if certain criteria are met.  The consideration of the arrangement is allocated to the separate units of accounting using the relative selling price method.  Applicable revenue recognition criteria are considered separately for each separate unit of accounting.

Revenue from fixed price contracts is recognized primarily under the percentage of completion method.  Under this method we recognize estimated contract revenue and resulting income based on costs incurred to date as a percentage of the total estimated costs as we consider this model to best reflect the economics of these contracts.  In such contracts, the Company’s efforts, measured by time incurred, typically represents the contractual milestones or output measure.   If at any time during the contract period, we determine that a loss will occur, we recognize the loss in that period. Furthermore, if in previous periods a profit was recognized under the percentage-of completion method, the profit would be reversed during the periodwe determined a loss on the contract exists.

Derivative Instruments

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB“)  ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-05, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock (“EITF Issue 07-05”) (Topic 815) which applies to the determination of whether any freestanding financial instruments or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133 (Topic 815), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and to any freestanding financial instruments are potentially indexed to an entity’s own common stock.  EITF Issue No. 07-05 (Topic 815) became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  The Company adopted Topic 815 as of April 1, 2009.  As a result, warrants to purchase 285,454 shares of our common stock previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were no longer afforded equity treatment. The warrants had exercise prices ranging from $30.00-$495.00 and expired or will expire between February 2010 and September 2013. As such, effective April 1, 2009, the Company reclassified the fair value of these warrants, which had exercise price reset features, from equity to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability since their date of issue between February 2000 and January 2006.  On April 1, 2009, the Company reclassified $346 from additional paid-in capital, as a cumulative effect adjustment, to beginning accumulated deficit, and $502 to common stock warrant liability to recognize the fair value of such warrants on such date.  At June 30, 2013, the fair value of the warrants was $7, which was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:  risk-free interest rate of 1.41%; expected life of 0.19 years; an expected volatility factor of 153.7%; and a dividend yield of 0.0%.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the Company recorded non-cash gains of $3 and $1 related to these warrants.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740 – “Income Taxes”, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. Under ASC 740, the liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We evaluate annually the realizability of our deferred tax assets by assessing our valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization include our forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. In 2013 and 2012, we have recorded a full valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets based on our past losses and uncertainty regarding our ability to project future taxable income. In future periods, if we are able to generate income we may reduce or eliminate the valuation allowance.

8

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

Sequel Power

On January 14, 2011, we entered into a Formation and Contribution Agreement with se2quel Partners and Sequel Power.  We contributed $2 million in cash to Sequel Power and issued warrants to purchase shares of our common stock in exchange for an approximate 25% ownership interest in Sequel Power.  Sequel Power was focused on the promotion of solar power plant development projects worldwide.  The management services provided to Sequel Power represented the Company’s sole source of revenue for fiscal 2012.   We impaired the entire book value of our investment in Sequel Power on March 31, 2012.  On March 21, 2013, Sequel Power and se2quel Partners irrevocably assigned and transferred to the Company for cancelation the balance of Sequel Power’s warrants representing the right to purchase 44,578 shares of the Company’s common stock, leaving a balance of 92,888 warrants still outstanding.  In exchange, we agreed to terminate our Management Services Agreement and to waive receivables related to accrued fees thereunder. We do not anticipate making any additional investments in Sequel Power or any other solar-related businesses.

Management evaluates our joint venture arrangements to determine whether they should be recorded on a consolidated basis.  The percentage of ownership interest in the joint venture, an evaluation of control and whether a variable interest entity (“VIE”) exists are all considered in the consolidation assessment.

We account for our investment in joint ventures where we own a non-controlling interest or where we are not the primary beneficiary of a VIE using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, our cost of investment is adjusted for our share of equity in the earnings of the unconsolidated affiliate and reduced by distributions received.

Any differences between the cost of our investment in an unconsolidated affiliate and our underlying equity as reflected in the unconsolidated affiliate’s financial statements generally result from a different basis in assets contributed to the joint venture. The net difference between our investment in unconsolidated affiliates and the underlying equity of unconsolidated affiliates is generally amortized over a period of ten years, which was determined to be the estimated useful life of the underlying intangibles which created the difference in carrying amount.

On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the fair value of our investments in unconsolidated affiliates may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if our estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. Our estimates of fair value for each investment are based on a number of assumptions such as future revenue projections, operating forecasts, discount rates and capitalization rates, among others.  These assumptions are subject to economic and market uncertainties. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, the fair values estimated in the impairment analyses may not be realized.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and we consider what assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.   The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

9

· Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.

· Level 2: Directly or indirectly observable inputs as of the reporting date through correlation with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data from actively quoted markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

· Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of money market funds.  At June 30, 2013, all of our investments were classified as cash equivalents in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The carrying amounts of our cash equivalents are valued using Level 1 inputs.  The value of our warrant liability is determined using Level 3 inputs.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as its method of valuation for warrants that are subject warrant liability accounting.  The determination of the fair value as of the reporting date is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables which could provide differing variables.  These variables include, but are not limited to, expected stock price volatility over the term of the security and risk free interest rate.  In addition, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of an expected life for the securities for which we have estimated based upon the stage of the Company’s development.  The fair value of the warrant liability is revalued each balance sheet date utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model computations with the decrease or increase in the fair value being reported in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss as other income, net.  A significant increase (decrease) of any of the subjective variables independent of other changes would result in a correlated increase (decrease) in the liability and an inverse effect on net income.

The change in the fair value of warrants is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	10		$	19
Change in fair value recorded in earnings		(3	)		(1	)
Balance at the end of the period	$	7		$	18

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include patents, trade names, software, non-compete agreements, customer relationships and trademarks that are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three to ten years.  The Company performs an ongoing review of its identified intangible assets to determine if facts and circumstances exist that indicate the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  If such facts and circumstances exist, the Company assesses the recoverability of identified intangible assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flow associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts.  Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.   As of the current reporting period, the Company’s remaining intangible assets, not including those related to the acquisition of CollabRx, were internally developed, which have a carrying value of zero.

During fiscal year 2012, the Company, as part of its proposed sale of its intellectual property portfolio for Nanolayer Deposition Technology (“NLD”), completed the sale of two of the four lots for the received purchase price of approximately $3,750.  The Company continues to market the remaining patents to independent third parties.  NLD is a process technology that bridges the gap between high throughput, non-conformal chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”) and highly conformal, low throughput atomic layer deposition (“ALD”).  The entire portfolio included over 35 US and international patents in the areas of pulsed-CVD, plasma-enhanced ALD, and NLD.

10

With the acquisition of CollabRx, the Company acquired software, trade names, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and goodwill.  The lives of the acquired intangible assets range from three to ten years.  Intangible assets, except for trade names, are amortized on a straight-line basis.  Intangible assets related to trade names are not amortized.  The Company tests for impairment at least annually.  The fair values of these assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount might not be recoverable. If undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss will be recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.  The amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was $52 and $0.   The amortization expense included in cost of revenue is related to the acquired software and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the asset, which the Company believes to be ten years.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, as well as at fiscal year end. If undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.

The Company recorded zero disposal losses for fixed assets for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

We have adopted several stock plans that provide for issuance of equity instruments to our employees and non-employee directors. Our plans include incentive and non-statutory stock options and restricted stock awards.  These equity awards generally vest ratably over a four-year period on the anniversary date of the grant, and stock options expire ten years after the grant date. Certain restricted stock awards may vest on the achievement of specific performance targets.  We also have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) that allows qualified employees to purchase Company shares at 85% of the fair market value on specified dates.

Total stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $84 and $54, respectively.  The total compensation expense related to non-vested stock options and RSUs not yet recognized at June 30, 2013 is $559.

The Company utilized the following valuation assumptions to estimate the fair value of options that were granted for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

STOCK OPTIONS:	2013			2012
Expected life (years)		6.0			6.0
Volatility		153.7	%		155.3	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.41	%		0.69	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%

ESPP awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with expected volatility calculated using a six-month historical volatility.   No ESPP awards were made in the three month period ended June 30, 2013.

Valuation and Other Assumptions for Stock Options

Valuation and Amortization Method.    We estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We estimate the fair value using a single option approach and amortize the fair value on a straight-line basis for options expected to vest. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods.

Expected Term.   The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that the options are expected to be outstanding. We estimate the expected term of options granted based on our historical experience of exercises including post-vesting exercises and termination.

Expected Volatility.    We estimate the volatility of our stock options at the date of grant using historical volatilities.  Historical volatilities are calculated based on the historical prices of our common stock over a period at least equal to the expected term of our option grants.

11

Risk-Free Interest Rate.    We base the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the implied yield in effect at the time of option grant on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms equivalent to the expected term of our option grants.

Dividends.    We have never paid any cash dividends on common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Forfeitures.    We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures. We record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company granted no options.

Stock Options

A summary of the stock option activity during the three months ended June 30, 2013 is as follows:

	Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Beginning outstanding		263,876	$	10.23
Granted		--	$	-
Expected		--	$	-
Ending outstanding		263,876	$	10.23		7.30	$	1,274.00
Ending vested and expected to vest		263,265	$	10.23		7.30	$	1,274.00
Ending exercisable		158,080	$	14.45		6.09	$	1,274.00

The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding at June 30, 2013 is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the market price of our common stock as of June 30, 2013.

The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2013:

Range of Exercise Prices				Number Outstanding As of June 30, 2012		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable As of June 30, 2012		Weighted- Average Exercise Price As of June 30, 2012
$	2.90	$	6.00		164,329		9.06	$	3.81		58,602	$	3.70
	6.25		11.70		45,358		5.39		11.50		45,358		11.50
	17.80		28.10		39,269		4.22		21.63		39,244		21.63
	30.56		61.80		14,006		1.93		43.95		13,998		43.95
	61.94		151.94		854		1.20		88.99		832		89.52
	152.21		285.00		58		0.34		174.08		46		174.00
	286.72		300.27		2		0.00		293.50		-		-
$	2.90	$	300.27		263,876		7.30	$	10.23		158,080	$	14.45

12

As of June 30, 2013, there was $235 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options which the Company expects to recognize over a period of 3.0 years.

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes the Company’s unvested RSU activity for the three months ended June 30, 2013:

	Number			Weighted- Average
	of			Grant Date
	Shares			Fair Value
Balance March 31, 2013		183,904		$	2.67
Granted		-		$	-
Forfeited		-		$	-
Vested		(34,750	)	$	2.24
Balance, June 30, 2013		149,154		$	2.77

Unvested Restricted Stock at June 30, 2013

As of June 30, 2013, there was $324 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding RSUs, which the Company expects to recognize over a period of 1.91 years.

2.Earnings Per Share (EPS):

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders (numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) for the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted EPS uses the average market prices during the period.

Basic net loss per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding.

The following table represents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per common share:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Loss from continuing operations	$	(679	)	$	(678	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(118	)		(1	)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders	$	(797	)	$	(679	)
Basic and diluted:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		1,953			1,689
Weighted-average common shares used in per share computation		1,953			1,689
Net loss per share from continuing operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.35	)	$	(0.40	)
Net loss per share from discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.00	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.40	)

13

Outstanding options, RSUs and ESPP’s of 414,236 and 374,833 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $10.35 and $8.80 on June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share for the three month periods presented as a result of their anti-dilutive effect.  Also, 8,288 liability warrants with an average exercise price of $30.00 and warrants to purchase 92,888 shares of common stock with an average exercise price of $3.15 per share were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share.  Such securities could potentially dilute earnings per share in future periods.

3.Financial Instruments:

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, notes receivable, accrued expenses and other liabilities approximates fair value due to their relatively short maturity. Prior to February 9, 2010, the Company sold products in various global markets. As a result, the Company was exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.  The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.  Foreign currency transaction gains and (losses) included in other income (expense), were $0 and $5 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  On June 30, 2013, the Company had no open foreign exchange contracts to sell Euros or any other foreign currencies.  On June 30, 2013, the Company had 8,288 liability warrants outstanding with an exercise price of $30.00 expiring in September 2013.  The Company recorded a non-cash gain of $3 and $1 in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to these warrants.

Changes in the exchange rate between the Euro and the U.S. dollar are currently immaterial to our operating results. Exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk may increase over time as our business evolves.

The balance in note receivable at June 30, 2013 was $0.  In the first quarter of the current fiscal year, the note receivable balance consisted of a loan related to the Company’s investment in CollabRx.  After the completion of the acquisition of CollabRx, the note receivable was reclassified to be included as part of the purchase price, thereby extinguishing the $300 bridge loan previously extended to CollabRx.  Also as part of the purchase price, the Company assumed $500 of existing CollabRx indebtedness through the issuance of promissory notes.  The principal of the promissory notes is payable in equal installments on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of issuance, along with the accrued but unpaid interest as of such dates.  See Note 8 CollabRx Acquisition.

On November 22, 2011, the Company completed a $300 strategic investment in NanoVibronix, Inc., a private company that develops medical devices and products that implement its proprietary therapeutic ultrasound technology.  The Company’s investment in NanoVibronix is in the form of a convertible promissory note that bears interest at a rate of 10% per year compounded annually and matures on November 15, 2014.  Principal and accrued interest under the note automatically convert into shares of Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of NanoVibronix upon the earlier to occur of (i) a $3,000 (or larger) equity financing by NanoVibronix or (ii) a sale of NanoVibronix.  In addition, the Company may convert principal and accrued interest under the note into shares of NanoVibronix Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock at its election at any time.  In either case, the conversion price is $0.284 per share.

4.Discontinued Operations:

Due to a sharp decline in revenues in its legacy Etch and PVD products as a result of the overall collapse of the semiconductor capital equipment market and global financial crisis in fiscal year 2009, the Company sold its legacy Etch and PVD assets in March 2010.  The Company retained the DRIE products which it had acquired from AMMS, along with the Compact™cluster platform and the NLD technology that it had developed over the past several years.  As the semiconductor markets recovered, the Company was not in a position to make the needed investments to improve its competitive position.  As a result, the Company also sold its DRIE and Compact related assets on February 9, 2011, but retained its NLD intellectual property.

As a result of the sale of the Company’s DRIE assets, and in accordance with GAAP, the DRIE business operations related to the designing, manufacturing, marketing and servicing of systems and parts within the semiconductor industry are presented as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.  The exit from the DRIE operation was essentially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of our 2011 fiscal year.

On May 7, 2012, the Company received a VAT refund related to discontinued operations in its former French subsidiary in the amount of 312 Euros.  This amount was recognized in other assets of discontinued operations.  The settlement of this outstanding amount due was classified as a reduction of assets of discontinued operations.  The related foreign exchange gain or loss was classified as a gain or loss on the sale of discontinued operations in the first quarter of the prior fiscal year.

14

In the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized a cash gain of $20 in discontinued operations as a result of final closing of bank accounts in its Italian subsidiary and a federal tax refund regarding discontinued operations, and a net $4 non cash gain related to the write off of discontinued assets and liabilities in its foreign subsidiaries.  The Company also recognized a reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and into Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes.  The reclassification is related to the recognition of a non-cash loss of $142 from the foreign exchange differences from its former Tegal foreign subsidiaries, primarily as a result of the final closing the former Tegal German subsidiary.   The Company received permission to close the German subsidiary in June 2013.  No further audits or reviews are anticipated by foreign taxing authorities.

5.Geographical and Segment Information:

As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s source of revenue was related to genomics based technology information services.  For the prior period, the Company’s source of revenue was the project activities of Sequel Power.  The Company’s chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the President and Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company.

For geographical reporting, revenues are attributed to the geographic location in which the customers’ facilities are located.  Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment and are attributed to the geographic location in which they are located.  For all periods presented, net sales by geographic region were all in the United States.

Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are all part of continuing operations.

	Revenue for the
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Segment Revenue:
Genomics based technology information	$	270	$	-
Solar power management services		--		25
Total revenue	$	270	$	25

CollabRx’s genomics based technology information business will form the core of our business and operations going forward.  Additionally, all long-lived assets are located in the United States and are included in continuing operations.  There are no long-lived assets in discontinued operations.

6.Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2012-04, Technical Corrections and Improvements ("ASU 2012-04"), which makes certain technical corrections and “conforming fair value amendments” to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments affect various Codification topics and apply to all reporting entities within the scope of those topics. These provisions of the amendment are effective upon issuance, except for amendments that are subject to transition guidance.  The new guidance is effective for fiscal periods after December 15, 2012 and had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  The new guidance requires entities to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income unless the amounts are not reclassified in their entirety to net income. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, entities are required to cross-reference other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts.  The new guidance is effective for fiscal periods after December 15, 2012 and had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.  See Note 4, Discontinued Operations.

15

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2013-05”). ASU 2013-05 clarifies that when a parent reporting entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in ASC 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. ASU 2013-05 is effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The new guidance was adopted early and had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.  See Note 4, Discontinued Operations.

7.Investments:

The NanoVibronix Transaction

On November 22, 2011, the Company completed a $300 strategic investment in NanoVibronix, a private company that develops medical devices and products that implement its proprietary therapeutic ultrasound technology.  NanoVibronix is focused on creating products utilizing its proprietary low-intensity surface acoustic wave (“SAW”) technology. The company's unique, patented approach enables the transmission of low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound waves through a variety of soft, flexible materials, including skin and tissue, enabling low-cost, breakthrough devices targeted at large, high-growth markets.  A copy of the Company’s press release was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2011 and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Company’s investment in NanoVibronix is in the form of a convertible promissory note that bears interest at a rate of 10% per year compounded annually and matures on November 15, 2014.  Principal and accrued interest under the note automatically convert into shares of Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of NanoVibronix upon the earlier to occur of (i) a $3,000 (or larger) equity financing by NanoVibronix or (ii) a sale of NanoVibronix.  In addition, the Company may convert principal and accrued interest under the note into shares of NanoVibronix Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock at its election at any time.  In either case, the conversion price is $0.284 per share.

8.CollabRx Acquisition:

On July 12, 2012, we completed the acquisition of CollabRx, pursuant to the previously announced Merger Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2012.   In connection with the Merger Agreement and the Employment Agreement dated as of June 29, 2012 by and among the Company and James Karis, on July 12, 2012, Mr. Karis, the former Chief Executive Officer of CollabRx, was appointed the Co-Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company.   In addition, pursuant to the Indemnity Agreement dated as of July 12, 2012 by and between the Company and James Karis (the “Indemnity Agreement”), Mr. Karis has been granted customary indemnification rights in connection with his position as an officer and director of the Company.

Additional information is set forth in the Company’s 8-K report filed on July 18, 2012, and is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

The allocation of the purchase price for the CollabRx acquisition is set forth in the Company’s Form 10-Q reports filed on November 14, 2012 and February 13, 2013, as well as its Form 10-K report filed on June 27, 2013.

On December 7, 2012, CollabRx and James M. Karis entered into an Amendment No. 1 (the “Employment Agreement Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement dated June 29, 2012 between the Company and Mr. Karis (the “Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to the Employment Agreement Amendment, Mr. Karis resigned as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective December 31, 2012 (the “Termination Date”) but will continue to serve as a director of the Company and provide consulting services to the Company from time to time after the Termination Date.  In addition, the Company waived its entitlement to recoup from Mr. Karis his signing bonus and Mr. Karis agreed to amend his RSU Agreement to terminate vesting as of the Termination Date.  The Company and Mr. Karis also agreed to a mutual release of claims.  The full text of the Employment Agreement Amendment and the RSU Agreement amendment was filed as Exhibit 10.1 and 10.2 to the form 8-K filed on December 7, 2012, and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

CollabRx offers cloud-based expert systems that provide clinically relevant interpretive knowledge to institutions, physicians, researchers and patients for genomics-based medicine in cancer and other diseases to inform health care decision making.  With access to over 75 clinical and scientific advisors at leading academic institutions and a suite of tools and processes that combine artificial intelligence-based analytics with proprietary interpretive content, CollabRx is well positioned to participate in the $300 billion value-added “big data” opportunity in the US health care market (as reported by McKinsey Global Institute), over half of which specifically targets areas in cancer and cancer genomics.   The Company recognized $20 in tax benefit in the three months ended June 30, 2013 regarding the deferred tax liability related to this acquisition.

16

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (Amounts in thousands)

Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

Information contained or incorporated by reference in this report contains forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and beliefs and involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations.  These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as predictions of future events as we cannot assure you that the events or circumstances reflected in these statements will be achieved or will occur.  You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will”, “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or “continue” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology which constitutes projected financial information.  These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the Company including, but not limited to, industry conditions, economic conditions and acceptance of new technologies.  For a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, see “Part II, Item 1A.—Risk Factors“ and the “Liquidity and Capital Resources“ section set forth in this section and such other risks and uncertainties as set forth below in this report or detailed in our other SEC reports and filings. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements.

The Company

Corporate Information

CollabRx, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CollabRx,” the “Company” or “we,” “us,” and “our”), is the recently renamed Tegal Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Tegal”), which acquired a private company of the same name on July 12, 2012.  Following approval by its stockholders on September 25, 2012, Tegal amended its charter and changed its name to “CollabRx, Inc.” (the “Name Change”).

Tegal was formed in December 1989 to acquire the operations of the former Tegal Corporation, a division of Motorola, Inc.  Tegal’s predecessor company was founded in 1972 and acquired by Motorola, Inc. in 1978. Tegal completed its initial public offering in October 1995.

Company Background

CollabRx (f/k/a Tegal) was formed in December 1989 to acquire the operations of the former Tegal Corporation, a division of Motorola, Inc.  Until recently, we designed, manufactured, marketed and serviced specialized systems used primarily in the production of semiconductors and micro-electrical mechanical devices, including integrated circuits, memory devices, sensors, accelerometers and power devices.  Beginning in late 2009, we experienced a sharp decline in revenues resulting from the collapse of the semiconductor capital equipment market and the global financial crisis.  In a series of transactions from 2010 to 2012, we sold the majority of our operating assets and intellectual property portfolio.  During the same time period, our Board of Directors evaluated a number of strategic alternatives, which included the continued operation of the Company as a stand-alone business with a different business plan, a merger with or into another company, a sale of the Company’s remaining assets, and the liquidation or dissolution of the Company.  We investigated opportunities within and outside the semiconductor capital equipment industry and evaluated a number of transactions involving other diversified technology-based companies.   Throughout this process, we developed and refined our criteria for a business combination, with an eventual focus on the healthcare industry, and specifically information technology and services within the healthcare industry.  In July 2012, we completed our acquisition of CollabRx (the “CollabRx Transaction”).   Following approval by our stockholders on September 25, 2012, we amended our charter and changed our name to “CollabRx, Inc.” (the “Name Change”).

Overview of our Current Business

CollabRx, Inc. is a development stage company just entering the commercialization phase of our business.  We are focused on developing and delivering content-rich knowledge-based products and services that inform healthcare decision-making, with an emphasis on genomics-based “precision” medicine and big data analytics.   Our proprietary content is organized in a knowledge base that expresses the relationship between genetic profiles and therapy considerations including molecular diagnostics, medical tests, clinical trials, drugs, biologics, and other information relevant for cancer treatment planning.  We have developed a method for capturing how practicing physicians use this information in the clinical setting, by incorporating within the knowledge base the views of a large network of independent key opinion leaders in medicine and medical research.

17

We search publicly available databases as source documents for our knowledgebase.  Such databases include those that are available, either free or on a commercial basis, in the areas of clinical trials, drugs, investigational compounds, biomarkers, bioinformatics, cancer ontology and literature.  We aggregate, annotate and integrate these datasets for the purpose of defining the relationship of biomarkers to therapeutic strategies, drugs and clinical trials. None of the individual databases we utilize as sources provide information on the interrelationships of these discrete elements.  In addition, CollabRx has developed a process for incorporating the guidance of our network of physician and research advisors in the selection of the most relevant data for specific diagnoses, histopathological data, prior treatments and biomarkers.  The result of this software- and expert-assisted process is proprietary content which includes decision rules, succinct statements of therapeutic strategy and a comprehensive listing of appropriate drugs and clinical trials, all related to specific aberrations which might be observed in connection with genomic testing.  Although the process and results are proprietary, we always refer to the relevant source documentation that provides the support for the identification of an actionable biomarker, typically a peer-reviewed, published paper.  In this way, we avoid the “black-box algorithm problem”, which is prevalent in other companies’ predictive analytical models, but is not currently a trusted methodology in medical practice.  Our proprietary content is incorporated into our knowledgebase, which is updated regularly with the assistance of a large network of independent advisors, and which forms the basis for all our products and services.

We currently deliver our proprietary content to users via web-based  applications and services in the “cloud, ” serving physicians and their patients in two settings: (i) at the point-of-care in the clinic and (ii) indirectly, as a part of a genetic test report provided to an ordering physician by a diagnostic testing laboratory, (i.e., the “lab”).  Portions of our web-based applications are currently available free to physicians and patients through commercial on-line media partners.  The content that we offer to laboratories is based on a “Software as a Service” or SaaS business model, in which our content is provided on a one-time, subscription or per test basis.

The systems and approach that we have developed for knowledge aggregation, content creation and expert advisory management can be applied to many disease states, but we have chosen to focus initially on genomic medicine in cancer, which is sometimes referred to as “precision oncology.”  This is an area of tremendous activity and promise, where clinical research in genomics has given rise to scores of “targeted” therapies that have proven in many cases to prolong the lives of cancer patients.  We believe that oncology is also the area of greatest need, where physicians and patients lack convenient access to clear and easy-to-understand information about which drugs, tests and clinical trials should be considered in constructing a cancer treatment plan based on the genetic profile of a tumor.  Our overall vision is that we are at the dawn of an era of explosive growth of data and information generated at the molecular level that must be interpreted and contextualized into knowledge before it can be used effectively by either physicians or patients.   We regard this knowledge as being the most valuable portion of the molecular diagnostic process and we believe that all sectors of the healthcare industry, including providers, insurers, drug developers and patients are potential users of this knowledge. We aim to deliver our proprietary interpretive content as quickly as possible and in as many usable forms as possible, via the Internet.

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the going concern basis, which assumes that we will be able to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.  The condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

Originally founded in 2008, CollabRx has developed clinical advisory networks, expert systems, proprietary tools and processes, and a pipeline of commercial data products and applications (“apps”) for cancer.  CollabRx Therapy Finders™, the Company’s first commercial product, provides sophisticated, credible, personalized, and actionable information to physicians and patients for rapidly determining which medical tests, therapies, and clinical trials may be considered in cancer treatment planning with a specific emphasis on the tumor genetic profile.

CollabRx Therapy Finders™ is a collection of web-based apps that serve as one type of user interface to access proprietary CollabRx content. Other interfaces include mobile apps, narrative published reports, statistical analyses and private-label, customized reports.  CollabRx content is dynamically updated and organized in a knowledgebase that includes information on molecular diagnostics, medical tests, clinical trials, drugs, biologics and other information relevant for cancer treatment planning. Capturing how highly respected practicing physicians use this information in the clinical setting further refines the knowledgebase.

Throughout most of fiscal 2012, our operations consisted mainly of our obligations under our management agreement with Sequel Power, LLC, a company dedicated to development of large-scale solar photovoltaic (“PV”) power plants and in providing related advisory services.  In January of 2011, we contributed $2 million in cash to Sequel Power in exchange for an approximate 25% economic interest and voting control on its Board of Managers.  In connection with the investment, our President and CEO was appointed Chairman of Sequel Power.  In addition to our management role in Sequel Power, we were engaged in the sale of remaining intellectual property from our discontinued operations in semiconductor capital equipment and in researching potential new investment opportunities in several areas, including solar technology, medical devices and health technology.

18

On November 22, 2011, we made an investment of $300 in NanoVibronix, Inc. in the form of a convertible promissory note.  NanoVibronix is a private company that develops medical devices and products that implement its proprietary therapeutic ultrasound technology which may be utilized for a variety of medical applications requiring low cost therapeutic ultrasound qualities. NanoVibronix is focused on creating products utilizing its unique, patented approach which enables the transmission of low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound surface acoustic waves (“SAWs”) through a variety of soft, flexible materials, including skin and tissue, enabling low-cost, breakthrough devices targeted at large, high-growth markets.

We intend that our most recent acquisition of CollabRx, Inc. will form the core of our operations going forward.  In September 2012, the Company changed its name to “CollabRx, Inc.” and the Company’s common stock, which previously traded under the ticker symbol “TGAL” on the Nasdaq Capital Market, began trading under the new ticker symbol “CLRX”.

We cannot assure you that we will be successful in pursuing our new strategic initiative in CollabRx.  If our efforts do not succeed, we may need to raise additional capital which may include capital raises through the issuance of debt or equity securities.  If additional funds are raised through the issuance of preferred stock or debt, these securities could have rights, privileges or preferences senior to those of our common stock, and debt covenants could impose restrictions on our operations. Moreover, such financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.  Failure to raise any needed funds would materially adversely affect us.  It is not possible to predict when our business and results of operations will improve.  In consideration of these circumstances, the Company may be forced to consider a merger with or into another company or the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, including through a bankruptcy proceeding.  We cannot assure you that we will be successful in pursuing this or any other strategic alternatives.  If we were to liquidate or dissolve the Company through or outside of a bankruptcy proceeding, you could lose all of your investment in the Company’s common stock.

Discontinued Operations

Until 2011, we designed, manufactured, marketed and serviced specialized plasma etch systems used primarily in the production of micro-electrical mechanical systems devices, such as sensors, accelerometers and power devices.  Previously, we also sold systems for the etching and deposition of materials found in other devices, such as integrated circuits and optoelectronic devices found in products such as smart phones, networking gear, solid-state lighting, and digital imaging.  Beginning in December 2008, sales for our legacy etch and PVD systems fell dramatically as the global financial crisis impacted semiconductor manufacturing.  According to Semiconductor Materials and Equipment International, total worldwide semiconductor capital equipment sales for calendar year 2009, in total, were only US$15.9B, a decrease of 46.1% over calendar year 2008 capital equipment sales (US$29.5B), which were, in turn, 31% lower than worldwide capital equipment sales in calendar year 2007 (US$42.8B). As a result of such poor business conditions for semiconductor capital equipment, there were a significant number of consolidations and bankruptcies among semiconductor capital equipment suppliers.

In a series of meetings in late May and early June 2009, our Board of Directors reviewed several basic strategic options presented by management.  The Board decided at that time that we should retain an advisor to consider “strategic alternatives” for the Company, and to investigate opportunities for the sale of the Company or its assets.  We retained Cowen & Co. for this purpose and received periodic briefings on those efforts during 2009 and 2010.  In December 2009, having received no bona fide offers for the Company as a going concern, the Board and management agreed to continue operations and to offer selected asset groups to potential buyers.

On March 19, 2010, we completed the sale of the legacy Etch and PVD assets to OEM Group, Inc., Due to limited resources, we discontinued our development efforts in NLD at the end of fiscal 2010, and began offering these assets for sale to third-parties.  At the same time, we began the process of closing and/or liquidating all of our other wholly-owned subsidiary companies, including SFI and Tegal GmbH, along with branches in Taiwan, Korea and Italy.   The subsidiaries were then included in discontinued operations.

Following our investment in Sequel Power, and as a result of our continuing efforts to reduce our operating losses, on February 9, 2011, the Company and SPTS entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement.  That agreement included the sale of all of the shares of Tegal France, SAS, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary and product lines and certain equipment, intellectual property and other assets relating to the DRIE systems and certain related technology.  In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the DRIE business operations related to the designing, manufacturing, marketing and servicing of systems and parts within the semiconductor industry was presented in discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated financial statements.  Amounts for the prior periods were reclassified to conform to this presentation.  The exit from the DRIE operation was essentially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of our 2011 fiscal year.

19

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the United States which requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and related footnotes.  Accounting and disclosure decisions with respect to material transactions that are subject to significant management judgment or estimates include but are not limited to revenue recognition, accounting for stock-based compensation, accounts for receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts and impairment of long-lived assets.  Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.  Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are required for management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions giving due consideration to materiality, in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the condensed, consolidated financial statements, and potentially result in materially different results under different conditions and assumptions.  We based these estimates and assumptions on historical experience and evaluate them on an on-going basis to help ensure they remain reasonable under current conditions.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  During the three months ended June 30, 2013, there were no significant changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed in the Company’s 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

20

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain financial items for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Revenue	$	270		$	--
Revenue - related party		--			25
Total revenue		270			25
Cost of revenue		18			--
Gross profit		252			25
Operating expenses:
Engineering		213			--
Research and development		130			--
Sales and marketing		59			--
General and administrative		559			712
Total operating expenses		961			712
Operating loss		(709	)		(687	)
Other income, net		10			9
Loss before income tax benefit		(699	)		(678	)
Income tax benefit		(20	)		--
Loss from continuing operations		(679	)		(678	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(118	)		(1	)
Net loss	$	(797	)	$	(679	)
Net loss per share from continuing operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.35	)	$	(0.40	)
Net loss per share from discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.00	)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.41	)	$	(0.40	)
Weighted-average shares used in per share computation:
Basic and diluted		1,953			1,689

Revenue

Immediately prior to the acquisition of CollabRx, the Company’s sole source of revenue was from management activities related to Sequel Power, a related party.  Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased by $245 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012.    The increase in the three month period relates to our acquisition of CollabRx.

As a percentage of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, international sales were 0%.  The Company’s historical operations had revenues in international markets.  With the acquisition of CollabRx, we expect that international sales will once again account for a significant portion of future revenue.

21

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased $227 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012.   Our gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2013 reflects the amortization of the Company’s product specific software, which was included in the CollabRx acquisition.

Our gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2013 was 93.3%.  Our gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2012, was 100%, as all revenues was management services revenue and no costs were incurred to record this revenue.

Engineering

Following the acquisition of CollabRx, engineering expenses consist primarily of salaries.  The increase in Engineering expense of $213 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0 for the same period in 2012, resulted from the CollabRx acquisition and the employees retained for those operations.  The increase in Engineering expenses in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012 reflected compensation paid to scientists and engineers that become our employees in connection with the CollabRx acquisition.   The Company had no expenses associated with engineering for the three months ended June 30, 2012 due to the exit from our core historical DRIE operations.   We define “engineering” as those development activities that are related to products, content or services which have been offered for sale or for which we have been paid.  We define “R&D” as those development activities which are not related to products which have been offered for sale or for which we have been paid.

Research and Development

Currently any expenses in research and development (“R&D”) result from the change in categorization of certain employee related expenses from engineering to R&D.  We include all of those employees who work both on engineering activities and R&D activities in the headcount within the Engineering and allocate  the expense to R&D, as categorized above.  The efforts of the engineering group include supporting existing product offerings as well as developing future product offerings.  Consequently, such expenses are segregated, and these expenses make up the total R&D expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013.  The increase in R&D expenses of $130 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to $0 for the same period in 2012 reflected compensation paid to scientists and engineers that became our employees in connection with the CollabRx acquisition.   The Company had no expenses associated with R&D for continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 due to the exit from our core historical DRIE operations.

As a result of the sale of the Company’s DRIE related assets, and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the DRIE business operation, including related and ongoing R&D expenses, have all been reclassified to discontinued operations.  For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company’s R&D expenses were related to the NLD product line, the assets of which were held for sale and sold to third parties.  R&D expenses for that period were also related to analyzing and evaluating various opportunities that the Company was reviewing as possible merger or acquisition opportunities in other diversified technologies.

Sales and Marketing

Following the acquisition of CollabRx, sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries.  The increase in sales and marketing expense of $59 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0 for the same period in 2012 resulted from the CollabRx acquisition.  The Company had no expenses associated with sales and marketing for the three months ended June 30, 2012 due to the exit from our core historical DRIE operations.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist of salaries, legal, accounting and related administrative services and expenses associated with general management, finance, information systems, human resources and investor relations activities.  The $153 decrease of continuing general and administrative expenses to $559 for the three month period ended June 30, 2013 compared to the $712 for the same period in 2012 was due primarily to lower expenses related to employees together with expenses for legal and consulting services in connection with the acquisition of CollabRx in 2012.   This was offset by higher expenses for facilities, accounting and stock compensation.

Other Income, net

Other income, net primarily consists of the change in fair value of the common stock warrant liability and interest earned on our NanoVibronix investment.

22

Income Taxes

As a result of  the acquisition of CollabRx by stock purchase, the Company had no tax basis in the intangible assets acquired.  During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized $20 in tax benefit as a result of this difference.

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, there was no income tax expense or benefit for federal and state income taxes reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations due to our net loss and a valuation allowance on the resulting deferred tax asset.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $111.8million and $64.9million for federal and state tax purposes, respectively.  The federal net operating loss carryforward will begin to expire in the year ending March 31, 2020 and the state of California net operating loss carryforward began to expire in the year ended March 31, 2013.  At March 31, 2013, the Company also had research and experimentation credit carryforwards of $1.3millionand$0.8millionfor federal and state income tax purposes, respectively.  A portion of the federal credit began to expire in the year ended March 31, 2012 and the state of California will never expire under current law.   Net operating loss carryforwards and R&D credits can only offset 90% of taxable income.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations consists of interest income from accounts related to discontinued operations, other income, gains and losses on the disposal of fixed assets of discontinued operations, gains and losses on foreign exchange and interest income on money market accounts, as well as the reclassification of net expenses associated with our exit from our historical core operations.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013 net cash income from discontinued operations increased by $20 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012 resulting from the final closing of bank accounts in its Italian subsidiary and a federal tax refund regarding discontinued operations.  The Company recognized a net $4 non cash gain related to the write off of discontinued assets and liabilities in its foreign subsidiaries.

The Company recognized a reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and into Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes.  The reclassification is related to the recognition of a non-cash loss of $142 from the of foreign exchange differences from its former Tegal foreign subsidiaries, primarily as a result of the final closing of the former Tegal German subsidiary.   The Company received permission to close the German subsidiary in June 2013.  No further audits or reviews are anticipated by foreign taxing authorities.

Contractual Obligations

The following summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2013, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands).

Contractual obligations:			Less than						After
	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		5 Years
Non-cancelable operating lease obligations	$	523	$	111	$	261	$	151	$	-
Total contractual cash obligations	$	523	$	111	$	261	$	151	$	-

Most leases provide for the Company to pay real estate taxes and other maintenance expenses. Rent expense for operating leases related to discontinued operations, net of sublease income, was $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2013.  Rent expense for operating leases related to continuing operations, net of sublease income, was $41 and $15 for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

As of September 1, 2012, we maintain our headquarters, encompassing our executive office and storage areas in San Francisco, California.   We have a primary lease for office space, consisting of 2,614 square feet, which expires August 31, 2017.  Prior to moving to San Francisco, we were located in Petaluma, California.  We had a primary lease for office space, consisting of 2,187 square feet, which expired August 31, 2012.  We rent storage/workspace areas on a monthly basis.  We own all of the equipment used in our facilities.  Such equipment consists primarily of computer related assets.

23

Certain of our past sales contracts included provisions under which customers would be indemnified by us in the event of, among other things, a third party claim against the customer for intellectual property rights infringement related to our products. There are no limitations on the maximum potential future payments under these guarantees. We have accrued no amounts in relation to these provisions as no such claims have been made, and we believe we have valid, enforceable rights to the intellectual property embedded in our products.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, we financed our operations from existing cash on hand.  Net cash used in operating activities during the three months ended June 30, 2013 was $611.  The primary changes in our cash flow statement for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the corresponding period in the prior fiscal year were due to our acquisition of CollabRx, a net loss of $797, partially offset by changes in assets and liabilities of discontinued operations and stock compensation expense.  Net cash used in operating activities during the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $329, due primarily to a VAT refund related to discontinued operations in our former French subsidiary in the amount of 312 Euros.  The monies from the VAT refund were offset by the net loss from continuing operations of $679 and the increase in accrued liabilities for legal expenses associated with the CollabRx transaction.

The consolidated financial statements contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses of $797 and $679 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  We used cash flows from operations of $611 and $329 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  We believe that our existing cash will be adequate to fund operations through fiscal year 2014.   While CollabRx, Inc. will form the core of our business and operations going forward, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in pursuing our new strategic initiative in CollabRx.  It is not possible to predict when our business and results of operations will improve.  In consideration of these circumstances, the Company may be forced to consider a merger with or into another company or the liquidation or dissolution of the company, including through a bankruptcy proceeding.  If we were to liquidate or dissolve the company through or outside of a bankruptcy proceeding, you could lose all of your investment in the Company’s common stock.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not currently have, nor have we ever had, any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, all of the Company’s investments were classified as cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheet.  The investment portfolio for each of these periods was comprised of money market funds.  With the sale of the DRIE related assets and the closure of our French subsidiary, our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations has been mostly eliminated.  For the period ended June 30, 2013, fluctuations of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro were immaterial to our financial statements.  In the prior fiscal year, these fluctuations primarily affected the balance of our pension obligation in Germany, which was settled in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.

Changes in the exchange rate between the Euro and the U.S. dollar are currently immaterial to our operating results. Exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk may increase over time as our business evolves.

Historically,  the Company has entered into foreign exchange contracts to sell Euros, which are used to hedge a sales transaction in which costs were denominated in U.S. dollars and the related revenue was generated in Euros.  As of June 30, 2013, there were no outstanding foreign exchange contracts.

24

Fair Value Measurements

The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and we consider what assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.   The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

· Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.

· Level 2: Directly or indirectly observable inputs as of the reporting date through correlation with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data from actively quoted markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

· Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

Our financial instruments consist primarily of money market funds.  At June 30, 2013, all of our investments were classified as cash equivalents in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The carrying amounts of our cash equivalents are valued using Level 1 inputs.  The value of our warrant liability is determined using Level 3 inputs.  The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as its method of valuation for warrants that are subject warrant liability accounting.  The determination of the fair value as of the reporting date is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables which could provide differing variables.  These variables include, but are not limited to, expected stock price volatility over the term of the security and risk free interest rate.  In addition, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of an expected life for the securities for which we have estimated based upon the stage of the Company’s development.  The fair value of the warrant liability is revalued each balance sheet date utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model computations with the decrease or increase in the fair value being reported in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss as other income, net.  A significant increase (decrease) of any of the subjective variables independent of other changes would result in a correlated increase (decrease) in the liability and an inverse effect on net income.

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Balance at the beginning of the period	$	10		$	19
Change in fair value recorded in earnings		(3	)		(1	)
Balance at the end of the period	$	7		$	18

Interest Rate Risk

We are only marginally exposed to interest rate risk through interest earned on money market accounts. Interest rates that may affect these items in the future will depend on market conditions and may differ from the rates we have experienced in the past. We do not hold or issue derivatives, commodity instruments or other financial instruments for trading purposes.

25

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls for Financial Reporting

Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal controls for financial reporting are procedures which are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized, our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use and our transactions are properly recorded and reported, all to permit the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures  

As of the period covered by this quarterly report, management performed, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act.  Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the report we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.   Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of June 30, 2013, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be involved in routine legal proceedings, as well as demands, claims and threatened litigation, which arise in the normal course of our business.  We believe there is no litigation pending that could, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our Company.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

We wish to caution you that there are risks and uncertainties that could affect our business. A description of the risk factors associated with our business that you should consider when evaluating our business is included under “Risk Factors” contained in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.  In addition to those factors and to other information in this Form 10-Q, the following updates to the risk factors should be considered carefully when evaluating the Company or our business.

We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks, some of which are beyond our control. The risks described below are those which we believe are the material risks we face. Any of the risk factors described below or additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our future growth is dependent on the successful development and introduction of new products and enhancements. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing and marketing, on a timely basis, new products or product enhancements, or that our new products will adequately address the changing needs of the health care marketplace.

A significant portion of our operating expense is relatively fixed and planned expenditures are based in part on expectations regarding future revenues. As a result, we are generally unable to mitigate the negative impact on margins in the short term.  Accordingly, unexpected revenue shortfalls may significantly decrease our operating results from quarter to quarter. As a result, in future quarters our operating results could fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, in which event our stock price would likely decrease.

26

We have a history of losses, expect to incur substantial further losses and may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future, which in turn could further materially decrease the price of our common stock.

We had net losses of $797, $3,928, and $1,429 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and the fiscal years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We used cash flows from operations of $611, $3,838 and $3,108 in these respective periods.  We expect to continue to sustain losses for the foreseeable future, which may decrease the price of our common stock.

Although we believe that our existing cash balances will be adequate to fund operations through fiscal year 2014, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in pursuing any of the strategic alternatives described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We intend that our most recent acquisition of CollabRx, Inc. will form the core of our operations going forward.

If our efforts do not succeed, we may need to raise additional capital which may include capital raises through the issuance of debt or equity securities.  If additional funds are raised through the issuance of preferred stock or debt, these securities could have rights, privileges or preferences senior to those of our common stock, and debt covenants could impose restrictions on our operations. Moreover, such financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.  Failure to raise any needed funds would materially adversely affect us.  In consideration of these circumstances, the Company may be forced to consider a merger with or into another company or the liquidation or dissolution of the company, including through a bankruptcy proceeding.

Our quarterly operating results may continue to fluctuate.

Our revenue and operating results have fluctuated and are likely to continue to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and we cannot assure you that we will achieve profitability in the future.

Factors that could affect our quarterly operating results include:

· operating results of CollabRx;

· operating results of any companies that we may acquire in the future;

· fluctuations in demand for our products, and the timing of agreements with strategic partners in the health care marketplace;

· the timing of new products and product enhancements;

· changes in the growth rate of the health care marketplace;

· our ability to control costs, including operations expenses;

· our ability to develop, induce and gain market acceptance for new products and product enhancements;

· changes in the competitive environment, including the entry of new competitors and related discounting of products;

· adverse changes in the level of economic activity in the United States or other major economies in which we do business;

· renewal rates and our ability to up-sell additional products;

· the timing of customer acquisitions;

· the timing of revenue recognition for our sales; and

· future accounting pronouncements or changes in our accounting policies.

27

Our future success depends on our ability to retain our key personnel and to successfully integrate them into our management team.

We are dependent on the services of our executive officers, our technical experts and other members of our senior management team, particularly Thomas Mika, our President and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of one or more of these key officers or any other member of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on us. We may not be able to retain or replace these key personnel, and we may not have adequate succession plans in place. Mr. Mika is subject to employment conditions or arrangements that contain post-employment non-competition provisions. However, these arrangements permit Mr. Mika to terminate his employment with us upon little or no notice and the enforceability of the non-competition provisions is uncertain.

If we are unable to hire, retain and motivate qualified personnel, our business would suffer.

Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled personnel. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly in software and biotechnology, may seriously harm our business, financial condition and operating results. Our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled personnel will be critical to our future success. Competition for highly skilled personnel is frequently intense, especially in the San Francisco Bay Area. We intend to issue stock options as a key component of our overall compensation and employee attraction and retention efforts. In addition, we are required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, to recognize compensation expense in our operating results for employee stock-based compensation under our equity grant programs, which may negatively impact our operating results and may increase the pressure to limit share-based compensation. We may not be successful in attracting, assimilating or retaining qualified personnel to fulfill our current or future needs. Also, to the extent we hire personnel from competitors, we may be subject to allegations that they have been improperly solicited or divulged proprietary or other confidential information.

The personalized healthcare market is rapidly evolving and difficult to predict. If the personalized healthcare market does not evolve as we anticipate or if healthcare market participants do not perceive value in our products, our sales will not grow as quickly as anticipated and our stock price could decline.

We are in a new, rapidly evolving category within the healthcare industry that focuses on using information technology to inform personalized cancer treatment planning. As such, it is difficult to predict important market trends, including how large the personalized healthcare market will be or when and what products customers will adopt. If the market does not evolve in the way we anticipate, if organizations do not recognize the benefit that our products offer, or if we are unable to sell our products to customers, then our revenue may not grow as expected or may decline, and our stock price could decline.

New or existing technologies that are perceived to address personalized cancer treatment planning in different ways could gain wide adoption and supplant our products, thereby weakening our sales and our financial results.

The introduction of products and services embodying new technologies could render our existing products obsolete or less attractive to customers. Other technologies exist or could be developed in the future, and our business could be materially negatively affected if such technologies are widely adopted. We may not be able to successfully anticipate or adapt to changing technology or customer requirements on a timely basis, or at all. If we fail to keep up with technological changes or to convince our customers and potential customers of the value of our products even in light of new technologies, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

We are dependent on a family of products that informs genomic-based medicine.

Our current product offering is limited to a family of products that informs genomic-based medicine using a unique approach of experts and expert systems.  We expect to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from this approach and the family of products based on this approach for the foreseeable future. A decline in the price of these products, whether due to competition or otherwise, or our inability to increase sales of these products, would harm our business and operating results. We expect that this concentration of revenue from a single product family comprised of a limited number of products will continue for the foreseeable future. As a result, our future growth and financial performance will depend heavily on our ability to develop and sell enhanced versions of our products. If we fail to deliver product enhancements, new releases or new products that customers want, it will be more difficult for us to succeed.

28

If we are unable to introduce new products successfully and to make enhancements to existing products, our growth rates would likely decline and our business, operating results and competitive position could suffer.

Our continued success depends on our ability to identify and develop new products and to enhance and improve our existing products, and the acceptance of those products by our existing and target customers. Our growth would likely be adversely affected if:

· we fail to introduce these new products or enhancements;

· we fail to successfully manage the transition to new products from the products they are replacing;

· we do not invest our development efforts in appropriate products or enhancements for markets in which we now compete and expect to compete;

· we fail to predict the demand for new products following their introduction to market; or

· these new products or enhancements do not attain market acceptance.

Any or all of the above problems could materially harm our business and operating results.

If we are unable to increase market awareness of our company and our products, our revenue may not continue to grow, or may decline.

The personalized healthcare market is nascent, and we have not yet established broad market awareness of our products and services. Market awareness of our value proposition and products will be essential to our continued growth and our success, particularly for the advanced stage treatment segment of the personalized cancer treatment market. If our marketing efforts are unsuccessful in creating market awareness of our company and our products, then our business, financial condition and operating results will be adversely affected, and we will not be able to achieve sustained growth.

We compete in highly competitive markets, and competitive pressures from existing and new companies may adversely impact our business and operating results.

The markets in which we compete are highly competitive. We expect competition to intensify in the future as existing competitors bundle new and more competitive offerings with their existing products and services, and as new market entrants introduce new products into our markets. This competition could result in increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses and our failure to increase, or the loss of, market share, any of which would likely seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If we do not keep pace with product and technology advances and otherwise keep our product offerings competitive, there could be a material and adverse effect on our competitive position, revenue and prospects for growth.

We compete either directly or indirectly with other medical database solution companies.   We do not believe that any of our principal competitors can offer the same scalable interactive expert solutions as CollabRx.  The principal competitive factors in our markets include, key strategic customer relationships, expert technical personnel, marketplace acceptance of our product, among others.

Many of our current and potential competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial, technical, research and development, sales and marketing, manufacturing, distribution and other resources and greater name recognition. We could also face competition from new market entrants, including our joint-development partners or other current technology partners. In addition, many of our existing and potential competitors enjoy substantial competitive advantages, such as:

· longer operating histories;

· the capacity to leverage their sales efforts and marketing expenditures across a broader portfolio of products;

· broader distribution and established relationships with partners;

· access to larger customer bases;

29

· greater customer support;

· greater resources to make acquisitions;

· larger intellectual property portfolios; and

· the ability to bundle competitive offerings with other products and services.

As a result, increased competition could result in loss of existing or new customers, price reductions, reduced operating margins and loss of market share. Our competitors also may be able to provide customers with capabilities or benefits different from or greater than those we can provide in areas such as technical qualifications or geographic presence, or to provide end-user customers a broader range of products, services and prices. In addition, some of our larger potential competitors have substantially broader product offerings and could leverage their relationships based on other products or incorporate functionality into existing products to gain business in a manner that discourages users from purchasing our products, including through selling at zero or negative margins, product bundling or closed technology platforms. These larger potential competitors may also have more extensive relationships within existing and potential customers that provide them with an advantage in competing for business with those customers. Our ability to compete will depend upon our ability to provide a better product than our competitors at a competitive price. We may be required to make substantial investments in research, development, marketing and sales in order to respond to competition, and there is no assurance that these investments will achieve any returns for us or that we will be able to compete successfully in the future.

Our limited operating history in the health care market makes it difficult for you to evaluate our current business and future prospects, and may increase the risk of your investment.

Our Company was formed in December 1989 to acquire the operations of the former Tegal Corporation, a division of Motorola, Inc.  Until recently, our Company designed, manufactured, marketed and serviced specialized plasma etch systems used primarily in the production of micro-electrical mechanical systems devices, such as sensors, accelerometers and power devices.  The Company’s Deep Reactive Ion Etch systems were also employed in certain sophisticated manufacturing techniques, involving 3-D interconnect structures formed by intricate silicon etching. For most of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, we also sold systems for the etching and deposition of materials found in other devices, such as integrated circuits and optoelectronic devices found in products such as smart phones, networking gear, solid-state lighting, and digital imaging.  We exited the semiconductor industry through a series of divestitures in 2010 to 2012.  In July 2012, we acquired CollabRx and entered the personalized healthcare market.  CollabRx was founded in 2008 to use information technology to inform personalized medicine.  Our current management has only been working together with our employee base for a short period of time. This limited operating history in the healthcare market makes financial forecasting and evaluation of our business difficult. Furthermore, because we depend in part on the market’s acceptance of our products, it is difficult to evaluate trends that may affect our business. We have encountered and will continue to encounter risks and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly changing industries. If we do not address these risks successfully, our business and operating results would be adversely affected, and our stock will be adversely affected.

We do not sell our products directly to users and rely instead on contractual relationships with key market participants who derive a benefit from offering our products to their users.  Our business development cycles can be long and unpredictable, and our business development efforts require considerable time and expense.

We do not sell our products directly to users.  Instead, we form strategic relationships with existing market participants who derive a benefit from offering our products to their users.  Our business development efforts involve educating our potential business partners about the use and benefits of our products. Such potential business partners are typically large, well-established companies with long evaluation cycles.  We spend substantial time and resources on our business development efforts without any assurance that our efforts will produce any sales. In addition, partnerships are frequently subject to budget constraints, multiple approvals and unplanned administrative, processing and other delays. These factors, among others, could result in long and unpredictable sales cycles. The length of our products’ business development cycles typically range from six to twelve months based on our limited experience, but may be longer as we expand our business development efforts to other segments of the healthcare market. As a result of these lengthy business development time-lines and the uncertain benefit that our partners may derive from offering our products, it is difficult for us to predict when our partners may purchase products from us and as a result, our operating results may vary significantly and may be adversely affected.

30

Our customers are concentrated and therefore the loss of a significant customer may harm our business.

We generate revenues from a small number of customers.  The loss of any of these customers would significantly impact our operating results in future periods.

We are exposed to risks associated with contract termination or delay

The software products for which we receive revenue are distributed through third-parties under license or contract, with varying terms.  Generally, our agreements with third-parties are subject to termination with notice and/or discretionary termination if certain revenue targets are not achieved.  In addition, our agreements generally do not contain revenue or performance guarantees, so our achieved revenues may vary from targets because of changes in strategic direction of our customers, contract termination, or from delays in projected launch dates, over which we have no influence or control.  The loss or delay of revenues associated with such contracts may harm our business and cause us to suffer further operating losses.

If our security is breached, our business could be disrupted, our operating results could be harmed, and customers could be deterred from using our products and services.

Our business relies on the secure electronic transmission, storage and hosting of information, including published data and proprietary databases.  We face the risk of a deliberate or unintentional incident involving unauthorized access to our computer systems that could result in misappropriation or loss of assets or information, data corruption, or other disruption of business operations.  Although we have devoted significant resources to protecting and maintaining the confidentiality of our information, including implementing security and privacy programs and controls, training our workforce, and implementing new technology, we have no guarantee that these programs and controls will be adequate to prevent all possible security threats. We believe that any compromise of our electronic systems, including the unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of information or a significant disruption of our computing assets and networks, would adversely affect our reputation and our ability to fulfill contractual obligations, and would require us to devote significant financial and other resources to mitigate such problems, and could increase our future cyber security costs.

Defects or errors in our software could harm our reputation, result in significant cost to us and impair our ability to market our products.

The software applications underlying our hosted products and services are inherently complex and may contain defects or errors, some of which may be material. Errors may result from our own technology or from the interface of our software with legacy systems and data, which we did not develop. The risk of errors is particularly significant when a new product is first introduced or when new versions or enhancements of existing products are released. The likelihood of errors is increased as a result of our commitment to frequent release of new products and enhancements of existing products.

Material defects in our software could result in a reduction in sales and/or delay in market acceptance of our products. In addition, such defects may lead to the loss of existing customers, difficulty in attracting new customers, diversion of development resources or harm to our reputation. Correction of defects or errors could prove to be impossible or impractical. The costs incurred in correcting any defects or errors or in responding to resulting claims or liability may be substantial and could adversely affect our operating results.

If we experience any failure or interruption in the delivery of our services over the Internet, customer satisfaction and our reputation could be harmed and customer contracts may be terminated.

If we experience any failure or interruption in the delivery of our services over the Internet, customer satisfaction and our reputation could be harmed and lead to reduced revenues and increased expenses.

31

We may expand our business through new acquisitions in the future. Any such acquisitions could disrupt our business, harm our financial condition and dilute current stockholders’ ownership interests in our company.

We may pursue potential acquisitions of, and investments in, businesses, technologies or products complementary to our business and periodically engage in discussions regarding such possible acquisitions. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including some or all of the following:

· difficulties in identifying and acquiring complementary products, technologies or businesses;

· substantial cash expenditures;

· incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, some of which we may not identify at the time of acquisition;

· difficulties in assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired companies;

· diversion of management’s attention away from other business concerns;

· risk associated with entering markets in which we have limited or no direct experience;

· potential loss of key employees, customers and strategic alliances from either our current business or the target company’s business; and

· delays in customer purchases due to uncertainty and the inability to maintain relationships with customers of the acquired businesses.

If we fail to properly evaluate acquisitions or investments, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions, we may incur costs in excess of what we anticipate, and management resources and attention may be diverted from other necessary or valuable activities. An acquisition may not result in short-term or long-term benefits to us. The failure to evaluate and execute acquisitions or investments successfully or otherwise adequately address these risks could materially harm our business and financial results. We may incorrectly judge the value or worth of an acquired company or business. In addition, our future success will depend in part on our ability to manage the growth anticipated with these acquisitions.

Furthermore, the development or expansion of our business or any acquired business or companies may require a substantial capital investment by us. We may not have these necessary funds or they might not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. We may also seek to raise funds for an acquisition by issuing equity securities or convertible debt, as a result of which our existing stockholders may be diluted or the market price of our stock may be adversely affected.

We may be subject to claims that we or our technologies infringe upon the intellectual property or other proprietary rights of a third party. Any such claims may require us to incur significant costs, to enter into royalty or licensing agreements or to develop or license substitute technology.

We cannot assure you that our software solutions and the technologies used in our product offerings do not infringe patents held by others or that they will not in the future. Any future claim of infringement could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against the claim, even if the claim is without merit, and could distract our management from our business. Moreover, any settlement or adverse judgment resulting from the claim could require us to pay substantial amounts or obtain a license to continue to use the technology that is the subject of the claim, or otherwise restrict or prohibit our use of the technology. Any required licenses may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. If we do not obtain any required licenses, we could encounter delays in product introductions if we attempt to design around the technology at issue or attempt to find another provider of suitable alternative technology to permit us to continue offering the applicable software solution. In addition, we generally provide in our customer agreements that we will indemnify our customers against third-party infringement claims relating to our technology provided to the customer, which could obligate us to fund significant amounts. Infringement claims asserted against us or against our customers or other third parties that we are required or otherwise agree to indemnify may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We may be unable to adequately enforce or defend our ownership and use of our intellectual property and other proprietary rights.

Our success is heavily dependent upon our intellectual property and other proprietary rights. We rely upon a combination of trademark, trade secret, copyright, patent and unfair competition laws, as well as license and access agreements and other contractual provisions, to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights. In addition, we attempt to protect our intellectual property and proprietary information by requiring certain of our employees and consultants to enter into confidentiality, non-competition and assignment of inventions agreements. The steps we take to protect these rights may not be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology by third parties or may not be adequate under the laws of some foreign countries, which may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

32

Our attempts to protect our intellectual property may be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation, and agreement terms that address non-competition are difficult to enforce in many jurisdictions and may not be enforceable in any particular case. Moreover, the degree of future protection of our intellectual property and proprietary rights is uncertain for products that are currently in the early stages of development because we cannot predict which of these products will ultimately reach the commercial market or whether the commercial versions of these products will incorporate proprietary technologies. In addition, there remains the possibility that others will “reverse engineer” our products in order to determine their method of operation and introduce competing products or that others will develop competing technology independently.

If we resort to legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the intellectual property or other proprietary rights of others, the proceedings could be burdensome and expensive, even if we were to prevail. The failure to adequately protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Extensive governmental regulation could require significant compliance costs and have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products.

We do not believe that any of our current or planned products are subject to regulation by the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) and other regulatory authorities worldwide.  Changes in the level of regulation, including an increase in regulatory requirements, could subject us to regulatory approvals and delays in launching our products. Modifying our products to comply with changes in regulations or regulatory guidance could require us to incur substantial costs. Further, changing regulatory requirements may render our products obsolete or make new products or product enhancements more costly or time consuming than we currently anticipate. Failure by us or our customers to comply with applicable regulations could result in increased regulatory scrutiny and enforcement. If our products fail to comply with government regulations or guidelines, we could incur significant liability or be forced to cease offering our applicable products or services.

If any of our products are deemed to be Medical Devices, then complying with medical device regulations on a global scale will be time consuming and expensive, and could subject us to unanticipated and significant delays.

Although the FDA has not determined that any of our products are medical devices that are actively regulated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and amendments thereto (collectively, the “Act”), the FDA may do so in the future.  Other countries have regulations in place related to medical devices that may in the future apply to certain of our products. If any of our products are deemed to be actively regulated medical devices by the FDA or similar regulatory agencies in countries where we do business, we could be subject to extensive requirements governing pre- and post-marketing activities, including pre-market notification clearance. Complying with medical device regulations would be time consuming and expensive, and could result in unanticipated and significant delays in the release of new products or product enhancements. Further, it is possible that these regulatory agencies may become more active in regulating software and medical devices that are used in healthcare. If we are unable to obtain the required regulatory approvals for any such products, our business plans for these products could be delayed or canceled.

The laws governing electronic health data transmissions continue to evolve and are often unclear and difficult to apply.  If we or our customers do not maintain the security and privacy of patient records, we may become subject to sanctions by various government entities.

Federal, state, local and foreign laws regulate the confidentiality of patient records and the circumstances under which those records may be released. These regulations govern both the disclosure and use of confidential patient medical record information and require the users of such information to implement specified security and privacy measures. United States regulations currently in place governing electronic health data transmissions continue to evolve and are often unclear and difficult to apply. Laws in non-U.S. jurisdictions may have similar or even stricter requirements related to the treatment of patient information.

In the United States, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) regulations require national standards for some types of electronic health information transactions and the data elements used in those transactions, security standards to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of health information and standards to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. Covered entities under HIPAA, which include health care organizations such as our customers, are required to comply with the privacy standards, the transaction regulations and the security regulations. Moreover, the recently enacted Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (“HITECH”) provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and associated regulatory requirements, extend many of the HIPAA obligations, formerly imposed only upon covered entities, to business associates as well, which has created additional liability risks related to the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information.

33

Evolving HIPAA and HITECH-related laws or regulations in the U.S. and data privacy and security laws or regulations in non-U.S. jurisdictions could restrict the ability of our clients to obtain, use or disseminate patient information. This could adversely affect demand for our products if they are not re-designed in a timely manner in order to meet the requirements of any new interpretations or regulations that seek to protect the privacy and security of patient data or enable our clients to execute new or modified health care transactions. We may need to expend additional capital, software development and other resources to modify our products to address these evolving data security and privacy issues.

If commercial third-party payers or government payers fail to provide coverage or adequate reimbursement for certain genomic tests offered by our customers, or if there is a decrease in the amount of reimbursement for our customers’ products  or future products they develop, our revenue and prospects for profitability may be harmed.

In both domestic and foreign markets, sales by our customers may depend, in large part, upon the availability of reimbursement from third-party payers. These third-party payers include government healthcare programs such as Medicare, managed care providers, private health insurers, and other organizations.  Physicians and patients may not order genomic test services or products from our customers unless commercial third-party payers and government payers pay for all, or a substantial portion, of the list price, and certain commercial third-party payers may not agree to reimburse our customers if Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (“CMS”) does not issue a positive coverage decision.  There is currently no national coverage decision that determines whether and how certain genomic tests are covered by Medicare. In the absence of a national coverage decision, local Medicare contractors that administer the Medicare program in various regions have some discretion in determining coverage and therefore payment for such tests.  Accordingly, if our customers do not receive full or partial reimbursement for their tests, our revenue and results of operations could be adversely effected.

In addition, there is significant uncertainty surrounding whether the use of products that incorporate new technology, such as Next Generation Sequencing (“NGS”)-based tests, for which we provide interpretative analysis, will be eligible for coverage by commercial third-party payers and government payers or, if eligible for coverage, what the reimbursement rates will be for those products. The fact that a diagnostic product has been approved for reimbursement in the past, for any particular indication or in any particular jurisdiction, does not guarantee that such a diagnostic product will remain approved for reimbursement or that similar or additional diagnostic products will be approved in the future. Reimbursement of NGS-based cancer products by commercial third party payers and government payers may depend on a number of factors, including a payor’s determination that products enabled by our molecular information platform are:

· not experimental or investigational;

· medically necessary;

· appropriate for the specific patient;

· cost-effective;

· supported by peer-reviewed publications;

· included in clinical practice guidelines; and

· supported by clinical utility studies.

The United States and foreign governments continue to propose and pass legislation designed to reduce the cost of healthcare. For example, in some foreign markets, the government controls the pricing of many healthcare products. We expect that there will continue to be federal and state proposals to implement governmental controls or impose healthcare requirements. In addition, the Medicare program and increasing emphasis on managed care in the United States will continue to put pressure on product pricing. Cost control initiatives could decrease the price that our customers would receive for any products in the future, which may limit our revenue and profitability.

34

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

The closing price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market has ranged from a high as $5.23 to a low of $3.01 from July 12, 2012, the closing date of our acquisition of CollabRx, through June 30, 2013. The trading price of our common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

· our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in our industry;

· announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts or acquisitions;

· changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

· general economic and stock market conditions, including disruptions in the world credit and equity markets;

· the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock;

· future sales of our common stock; and

· the other factors described in these “Risk Factors.”

In recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant impact on the market price of securities issued by many companies, including companies in our industry. The price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little to do with our performance, and these fluctuations could materially reduce our stock price.

In the past, some companies, including companies in our industry, have had volatile market prices for their securities and have had securities class action suits filed against them. The filing of a lawsuit against us, regardless of the outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, as it could result in substantial legal costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Our actual operating results may differ significantly from guidance provided by our management.

Although it has not been our practice in the recent past to do so, we may from time to time release guidance in our quarterly earnings releases, quarterly earnings conference call, or otherwise, regarding our future performance that represent our management’s estimates as of the date of release. This guidance, which includes forward-looking statements, is based on projections prepared by our management. These projections are not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and neither our registered public accountants nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines the projections and, accordingly, no such person expresses any opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto.

Projections are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. We generally state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to represent that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. The principal reason that we release guidance is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and investors. We do not accept any responsibility for any projections or reports that may be published by analysts.

Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions of the guidance furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, our guidance is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date of release. Actual results will vary from our guidance and the variations may be material. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged not to rely upon, or otherwise consider, our guidance in making an investment decision in respect of our common stock. Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy could result in the actual operating results being different from our guidance, and such differences may be adverse and material.

35

Provisions of Delaware law and our organizational documents may discourage takeovers and business combinations that our stockholders may consider in their best interests, which could negatively affect our stock price.

Provisions of Delaware law and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company or deterring tender offers for our common stock that other stockholders may consider in their best interests. In addition, our board of directors has adopted a shareholder rights plan, or “poison pill,” which has the effect of making it more difficult for a person to acquire control of our company in a transaction not approved by our board of directors.

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more different series with terms to be fixed by our board of directors. Stockholder approval is not necessary to issue preferred stock in this manner. Issuance of these shares of preferred stock could have the effect of making it more difficult and more expensive for a person or group to acquire control of us, and could effectively be used as an anti-takeover device. Currently there are no shares of our preferred stock issued or outstanding.

Our bylaws provide for an advance notice procedure for stockholders to nominate director candidates for election or to bring business before an annual meeting of stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors, and require that special meetings of stockholders be called only by our chairman of the board, chief executive officer, president or the board pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the board.

The anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law and provisions in our organizational documents may prevent our stockholders from receiving the benefit from any premium to the market price of our common stock offered by a bidder in a takeover context. Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock if they are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.

As a public company, we incur significant administrative workload and expenses.

As a public company with common stock listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market, we must comply with various laws, regulations and requirements, including certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules implemented by the SEC and The NASDAQ Stock Market. Complying with these statutes, regulations and requirements, including our public company reporting requirements, continues to occupy a significant amount of the time of our board of directors and management and involves significant accounting, legal and other expenses. We have hired, and anticipate that we will continue to hire, additional accounting personnel to handle these responsibilities, which will increase our operating costs. Furthermore, these laws, regulations and requirements could make it more difficult or more costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.

New laws and regulations as well as changes to existing laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules adopted by the SEC and by The NASDAQ Stock Market, would likely result in increased costs to us as we respond to their requirements. We are investing resources to comply with evolving laws and regulations, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not currently intend to do so for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your investment in our common stock for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in its value. Shares of our common stock may depreciate in value or may not appreciate in value.

The concentration of ownership among our existing directors, executive officers and principal stockholders provide them, collectively, with substantial control over us, which could limit your ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including a change of control.

Our directors, executive officers and each of our stockholders who own greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock and their affiliates, in the aggregate, own approximately 21% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, based on the number of shares outstanding as of June 30, 2013. As a result, these stockholders, if acting together, will be able to influence or control matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers, acquisitions or other extraordinary transactions. They may also have interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interests. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of our company, could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.

36

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

None

Item 5.  Other Information

None.

Item 6.   Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of the Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	COLLABRX, INC. (Registrant)
	/s/  THOMAS R. MIKA
	Thomas R. Mika
	Acting Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 14, 2013

37

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas R. Mika, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CollabRx, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s), if any, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s), if any, and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2013	/s/    Thomas R. Mika
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas R. Mika, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CollabRx, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s), if any, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s), if any, and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2013	/s/    Thomas R. Mika
	Acting Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CollabRx, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company“), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report“), I, Thomas R. Mika, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/    Thomas R. Mika

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2013

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CollabRx, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company“), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report“), I, Thomas R. Mika, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/    Thomas R. Mika

Acting Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2013

XML

Earnings Per Share (EPS) (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Earnings Per Share (EPS) [Abstract]

Calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share

The following table represents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per common share:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Loss from continuing operations	$	(679)	$	(678)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(118)		(1)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders	$	(797)	$	(679)
Basic and diluted:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		1,953		1,689
Weighted-average common shares used in per share computation		1,953		1,689
Net loss per share from continuing operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.35)	$	(0.40)
Net loss per share from discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.06)	$	(0.00)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.41)	$	(0.40)

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS [Abstract]
Revenue	$ 270	$ 0
Revenue - related party	0	25
Total revenue	270	25
Cost of revenue	18	0
Gross profit	252	25
Operating expenses:
Engineering	213	0
Research and development	130	0
Sales and marketing	59	0
General and administrative	559	712
Total operating expenses	961	712
Operating loss	(709)	(687)
Other income, net	10	9
Loss before income tax benefit	(699)	(678)
Income tax benefit	(20)	0
Loss from continuing operations	(679)	(678)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes	(118)	(1)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders	(797)	(679)
Foreign currency translation	0	0
Comprehensive loss	$ (797)	$ (679)
Net loss per share from continuing operations:
Basic and diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (0.35)	$ (0.40)
Net income per share from discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (0.06)	$ 0
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (0.41)	$ (0.40)
Weighted-average shares used in per share computation:
Basic and diluted (in shares)	1,953	1,689

XML

Geographical and Segment Information

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Geographical and Segment Information [Abstract]

Geographical and Segment Information

5.      Geographical and Segment Information:

As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s source of revenue was related to genomics based technology information services. For the prior period, the Company’s source of revenue was the project activities of Sequel Power. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the President and Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company.

For geographical reporting, revenues are attributed to the geographic location in which the customers’ facilities are located. Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment and are attributed to the geographic location in which they are located. For all periods presented, net sales by geographic region were all in the United States.

Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are all part of continuing operations.

	Revenue for the
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Segment Revenue:
Genomics based technology information		$	270		$	-
Solar power management services			-			25
Total revenue		$	270		$	25

CollabRx’s genomics based technology information business will form the core of our business and operations going forward. Additionally, all long-lived assets are located in the United States and are included in continuing operations. There are no long-lived assets in discontinued operations.

XML

Investments (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified					3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013		Nov. 22, 2011	Jun. 30, 2013 Nano Vibronix [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Nano Vibronix [Member] Convertible Promissory Note [Member]	Nov. 22, 2011 Nano Vibronix [Member] Convertible Promissory Note [Member]
Nano Vibronix Transaction [Abstract]
Strategic investment	$ 353	$ 345	[1]				$ 300
Interest rate on convertible promissory note (in hundredths)						10.00%
Maturity date of convertible promissory note					Nov. 15, 2014
Conversion into Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock					$ 3,000
Conversion price (in dollars per share)				$ 0.284	$ 0.284

[1] Derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements.

XML

Geographical and Segment Information (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Geographical and Segment Information [Abstract]

Schedule of revenue for all part of continuing operation

Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, are all part of continuing operations.

	Revenue for the
	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
Segment Revenue:
Genomics based technology information		$	270		$	-
Solar power management services			-			25
Total revenue		$	270		$	25

XML

CollabRx Acquisition (Details) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Jul. 12, 2012	Jun. 30, 2013 ClinicalandScientificAdvisor
CollabRx Acquisition [Abstract]
Business acquisition effective date	Jul. 12, 2012	Jul. 12, 2012
Acquisition agreement date		Jun. 29, 2012
Assets acquired [Abstract]
Number of clinical and scientific advisors		75
"Big data" opportunity value		$ 300,000,000,000
Tax benefit recognized		$ 20,000

XML

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1.      Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

CollabRx, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CollabRx,” the “Company” or “we,” “us,” and “our”), is the recently renamed Tegal Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Tegal”), which acquired a private company of the same name on July 12, 2012. Following approval by its stockholders on September 25, 2012, Tegal amended its charter and changed its name to “CollabRx, Inc.” (the “Name Change”).

Tegal was formed in December 1989 to acquire the operations of the former Tegal Corporation, a division of Motorola, Inc. Tegal’s predecessor company was founded in 1972 and acquired by Motorola, Inc. in 1978. Tegal completed its initial public offering in October 1995.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. We incurred net losses of $797 and $679 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We used $611 and $329 of cash in operating activities for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be adequate to fund operations through fiscal year 2014.

CollabRx offers cloud-based expert systems that provide clinically relevant interpretive knowledge to institutions, physicians, researchers and patients for genomics-based medicine in cancer and other diseases to inform health care decision-making. Our reference to the “cloud” is meant that a product or service can be delivered via the Internet, usually on a pay-for-use or subscription basis, versus the purchase and installation of enterprise-based software, which typically requires investments in both software and hardware, often also requiring large-scale customization efforts. With access to approximately 75 clinical and scientific advisors at leading academic institutions and a suite of tools and processes that combine artificial intelligence-based analytics with proprietary interpretive content, the Company is well positioned to participate in the value-added “big data” opportunity in the US health care. We use the term “big data” to refer to datasets whose size is beyond the ability of typical database software tools to capture, store, manage, and analyze.

The physicians and researchers within our network of advisors have agreed to participate in our efforts for an indefinite term, on an uncompensated basis, and without a formal agreement. The board assignments, biographies and current affiliations of all of our advisors are posted on our website.

Discontinued Operations

Since 2009, the Company has engaged in a process of transitioning away from its legacy lines of business in semiconductor capital equipment. As a result of the sale of the Company’s Deep Reactive Ion Etch (“DRIE”) assets in the fiscal year 2011, and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the DRIE business operations related to the designing, manufacturing, marketing and servicing of systems and parts within the semiconductor industry has been presented in discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The exit from the DRIE operation was essentially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of our 2011 fiscal year. However, the Company retained its intellectual property portfolio for Nanolayer Deposition Technology (“NLD”). During fiscal year 2012, the Company, as part of its proposed sale of its NLD portfolio, completed the sale transactions of two of four patent lots for approximately $3,750. The Company continues to market the remaining lots to independent third parties.

The Company recognized a reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and into Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes. The reclassification is related to the recognition of a non-cash loss of $142 of foreign exchange differences from its former Tegal foreign subsidiaries, primarily as a result of the final closing of the former Tegal German subsidiary. The Company received permission to close the German subsidiary in June 2013. No further audits or reviews are anticipated by foreign taxing authorities.

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the March 31, 2013 audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the information set forth herein. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), but omit certain information and footnote disclosures necessary to present the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could vary from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments. The Company’s accounts receivable balance is also subject to credit risk. Substantially all of the Company’s liquid investments are invested in money market funds. The Company’s accounts receivable are derived primarily from sales to customers located in the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally requires no collateral. The Company no longer maintains reserves for potential credit losses. There have been no write-offs during the periods presented.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, Sequel Power, LLC (“Sequel Power”) accounted for all the Company’s revenue. As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2013, Life Technologies and Everyday Health accounted for 93% and 7%, respectively, of the Company’s revenue and accounts receivable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments having a maturity of three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

At June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, all of the Company’s current investments are classified as cash equivalents in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 the fair value of the Company’s investments approximated cost.

Promissory Notes

On July 12, 2012, Tegal completed the acquisition of CollabRx. As part of the purchase price, Tegal issued promissory notes in the amount of $500 in exchange for the existing CollabRx indebtedness. The principal amount of the promissory notes is payable in equal installments on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of issuance, along with the accrued but unpaid interest as of such dates. See Note 8, CollabRx Acquisition.

On November 22, 2011, the Company completed a $300 strategic investment in NanoVibronix, Inc., (“NanoVibronix”) a private company that develops medical devices and products that implement its proprietary therapeutic ultrasound technology. The Company’s investment in NanoVibronix is in the form of a convertible promissory note that bears interest at a rate of 10% per year compounded annually and matures on November 15, 2014. Principal and accrued interest under the convertible promissory note automatically converts into shares of Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of NanoVibronix upon the earlier to occur of (i) a $3,000 (or larger) equity financing by NanoVibronix or (ii) a sale of NanoVibronix. In addition, the Company may convert principal and accrued interest under the convertible promissory note into shares of NanoVibronix Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock at its election at any time. In either case, the conversion price is $0.284 per share.

As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the Convertible Promissory Note balance was $353 and $345, respectively, consisting of the original $300 investment and $53 and $45, respectively, in accrued interest.

Accounts Receivable – Allowance for Sales Returns and Doubtful Accounts

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the Company had zero reserves for potential credit losses as such risk was determined to be immaterial. The Company had zero write-offs during the periods presented. The Company historically maintained an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of the Company’s customers to make required payments for system sales.

Revenue Recognition

Each contract sale of our interpretive data is evaluated individually in regard to revenue recognition. We have integrated in our evaluation the related guidance included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605 – “Revenue Recognition”. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

For arrangements that include multiple deliverables, we identify separate units of accounting based on the guidance under ASC 605-25 “Multiple Element Arrangements”, which provides that revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting, if certain criteria are met. The consideration of the arrangement is allocated to the separate units of accounting using the relative selling price method. Applicable revenue recognition criteria are considered separately for each separate unit of accounting.

Revenue from fixed price contracts is recognized primarily under the percentage of completion method. Under this method we recognize estimated contract revenue and resulting income based on costs incurred to date as a percentage of the total estimated costs as we consider this model to best reflect the economics of these contracts. In such contracts, the Company’s efforts, measured by time incurred, typically represents the contractual milestones or output measure. If at any time during the contract period, we determine that a loss will occur, we recognize the loss in that period. Furthermore, if in previous periods a profit was recognized under the percentage-of completion method, the profit would be reversed during the periodwe determined a loss on the contract exists.

Derivative Instruments

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB“) ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-05, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock (“EITF Issue 07-05”) (Topic 815) which applies to the determination of whether any freestanding financial instruments or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133 (Topic 815), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and to any freestanding financial instruments are potentially indexed to an entity’s own common stock. EITF Issue No. 07-05 (Topic 815) became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted Topic 815 as of April 1, 2009. As a result, warrants to purchase 285,454 shares of our common stock previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were no longer afforded equity treatment. The warrants had exercise prices ranging from $30.00-$495.00 and expired or will expire between February 2010 and September 2013. As such, effective April 1, 2009, the Company reclassified the fair value of these warrants, which had exercise price reset features, from equity to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability since their date of issue between February 2000 and January 2006. On April 1, 2009, the Company reclassified $346 from additional paid-in capital, as a cumulative effect adjustment, to beginning accumulated deficit, and $502 to common stock warrant liability to recognize the fair value of such warrants on such date. At June 30, 2013, the fair value of the warrants was $7, which was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.41%; expected life of 0.19 years; an expected volatility factor of 153.7%; and a dividend yield of 0.0%. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the Company recorded non-cash gains of $3 and $1 related to these warrants.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740 – “Income Taxes”, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. Under ASC 740, the liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We evaluate annually the realizability of our deferred tax assets by assessing our valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization include our forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. In 2013 and 2012, we have recorded a full valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets based on our past losses and uncertainty regarding our ability to project future taxable income. In future periods, if we are able to generate income we may reduce or eliminate the valuation allowance.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

Sequel Power

On January 14, 2011, we entered into a Formation and Contribution Agreement with se2quel Partners and Sequel Power. We contributed $2 million in cash to Sequel Power and issued warrants to purchase shares of our common stock in exchange for an approximate 25% ownership interest in Sequel Power. Sequel Power was focused on the promotion of solar power plant development projects worldwide. The management services provided to Sequel Power represented the Company’s sole source of revenue for fiscal 2012. We impaired the entire book value of our investment in Sequel Power on March 31, 2012. On March 21, 2013, Sequel Power and se2quel Partners irrevocably assigned and transferred to the Company for cancelation the balance of Sequel Power’s warrants representing the right to purchase 44,578 shares of the Company’s common stock, leaving a balance of 92,888 warrants still outstanding. In exchange, we agreed to terminate our Management Services Agreement and to waive receivables related to accrued fees thereunder. We do not anticipate making any additional investments in Sequel Power or any other solar-related businesses.

Management evaluates our joint venture arrangements to determine whether they should be recorded on a consolidated basis. The percentage of ownership interest in the joint venture, an evaluation of control and whether a variable interest entity (“VIE”) exists are all considered in the consolidation assessment.

We account for our investment in joint ventures where we own a non-controlling interest or where we are not the primary beneficiary of a VIE using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, our cost of investment is adjusted for our share of equity in the earnings of the unconsolidated affiliate and reduced by distributions received.

Any differences between the cost of our investment in an unconsolidated affiliate and our underlying equity as reflected in the unconsolidated affiliate’s financial statements generally result from a different basis in assets contributed to the joint venture. The net difference between our investment in unconsolidated affiliates and the underlying equity of unconsolidated affiliates is generally amortized over a period of ten years, which was determined to be the estimated useful life of the underlying intangibles which created the difference in carrying amount.

On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the fair value of our investments in unconsolidated affiliates may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if our estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. Our estimates of fair value for each investment are based on a number of assumptions such as future revenue projections, operating forecasts, discount rates and capitalization rates, among others. These assumptions are subject to economic and market uncertainties. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, the fair values estimated in the impairment analyses may not be realized.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and we consider what assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

· Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.

· Level 2: Directly or indirectly observable inputs as of the reporting date through correlation with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data from actively quoted markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

· Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of money market funds. At June 30, 2013, all of our investments were classified as cash equivalents in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The carrying amounts of our cash equivalents are valued using Level 1 inputs. The value of our warrant liability is determined using Level 3 inputs. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as its method of valuation for warrants that are subject warrant liability accounting. The determination of the fair value as of the reporting date is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables which could provide differing variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, expected stock price volatility over the term of the security and risk free interest rate. In addition, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of an expected life for the securities for which we have estimated based upon the stage of the Company’s development. The fair value of the warrant liability is revalued each balance sheet date utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model computations with the decrease or increase in the fair value being reported in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss as other income, net. A significant increase (decrease) of any of the subjective variables independent of other changes would result in a correlated increase (decrease) in the liability and an inverse effect on net income.

The change in the fair value of warrants is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Balance at the beginning of the period		$	10		$	19
Change in fair value recorded in earnings			(3)			(1)
Balance at the end of the period		$	7		$	18

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include patents, trade names, software, non-compete agreements, customer relationships and trademarks that are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three to ten years. The Company performs an ongoing review of its identified intangible assets to determine if facts and circumstances exist that indicate the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If such facts and circumstances exist, the Company assesses the recoverability of identified intangible assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flow associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. As of the current reporting period, the Company’s remaining intangible assets, not including those related to the acquisition of CollabRx, were internally developed, which have a carrying value of zero.

During fiscal year 2012, the Company, as part of its proposed sale of its intellectual property portfolio for Nanolayer Deposition Technology (“NLD”), completed the sale of two of the four lots for the received purchase price of approximately $3,750. The Company continues to market the remaining patents to independent third parties. NLD is a process technology that bridges the gap between high throughput, non-conformal chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”) and highly conformal, low throughput atomic layer deposition (“ALD”). The entire portfolio included over 35 US and international patents in the areas of pulsed-CVD, plasma-enhanced ALD, and NLD.

With the acquisition of CollabRx, the Company acquired software, trade names, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and goodwill. The lives of the acquired intangible assets range from three to ten years. Intangible assets, except for trade names, are amortized on a straight-line basis. Intangible assets related to trade names are not amortized. The Company tests for impairment at least annually. The fair values of these assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount might not be recoverable. If undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss will be recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. The amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was $52 and $0. The amortization expense included in cost of revenue is related to the acquired software and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the asset, which the Company believes to be ten years.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, as well as at fiscal year end. If undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.

The Company recorded zero disposal losses for fixed assets for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

We have adopted several stock plans that provide for issuance of equity instruments to our employees and non-employee directors. Our plans include incentive and non-statutory stock options and restricted stock awards. These equity awards generally vest ratably over a four-year period on the anniversary date of the grant, and stock options expire ten years after the grant date. Certain restricted stock awards may vest on the achievement of specific performance targets. We also have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) that allows qualified employees to purchase Company shares at 85% of the fair market value on specified dates.

Total stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $84 and $54, respectively. The total compensation expense related to non-vested stock options and RSUs not yet recognized at June 30, 2013 is $559.

The Company utilized the following valuation assumptions to estimate the fair value of options that were granted for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

STOCK OPTIONS:	2013			2012
Expected life (years)		6.0			6.0
Volatility		153.7	%		155.3	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.41	%		0.69	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%

ESPP awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with expected volatility calculated using a six-month historical volatility. No ESPP awards were made in the three month period ended June 30, 2013.

Valuation and Other Assumptions for Stock Options

Valuation and Amortization Method. We estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We estimate the fair value using a single option approach and amortize the fair value on a straight-line basis for options expected to vest. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods.

Expected Term. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that the options are expected to be outstanding. We estimate the expected term of options granted based on our historical experience of exercises including post-vesting exercises and termination.

Expected Volatility. We estimate the volatility of our stock options at the date of grant using historical volatilities. Historical volatilities are calculated based on the historical prices of our common stock over a period at least equal to the expected term of our option grants.

Risk-Free Interest Rate. We base the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the implied yield in effect at the time of option grant on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms equivalent to the expected term of our option grants.

Dividends. We have never paid any cash dividends on common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Forfeitures. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures. We record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company granted no options.

Stock Options

A summary of the stock option activity during the three months ended June 30, 2013 is as follows:

	Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Beginning outstanding		263,876	$	10.23
Granted		-	$	-
Expected		-	$	-
Ending outstanding		263,876	$	10.23		7.30		$	1,274.00
Ending vested and expected to vest		263,265	$	10.23		7.30		$	1,274.00
Ending exercisable		158,080	$	14.45		6.09		$	1,274.00

The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding at June 30, 2013 is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the market price of our common stock as of June 30, 2013.

The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2013:

Range of Exercise Prices				Number Outstanding As of June 30, 2012		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable As of June 30, 2012		Weighted- Average Exercise Price As of June 30, 2012
$	2.90	$	6.00		164,329		9.06	$	3.81		58,602	$	3.70
	6.25		11.70		45,358		5.39		11.50		45,358		11.50
	17.80		28.10		39,269		4.22		21.63		39,244		21.63
	30.56		61.80		14,006		1.93		43.95		13,998		43.95
	61.94		151.94		854		1.20		88.99		832		89.52
	152.21		285.00		58		0.34		174.08		46		174.00
	286.72		300.27		2		0.00		293.50		-		-
$	2.90	$	300.27		263,876		7.30	$	10.23		158,080	$	14.45

As of June 30, 2013, there was $235 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options which the Company expects to recognize over a period of 3.0 years.

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes the Company’s unvested RSU activity for the three months ended June 30, 2013:

	Number		Weighted- Average
	of		Grant Date
	Shares		Fair Value
Balance March 31, 2013		183,904		$	2.67
Granted		-		$	-
Forfeited		-		$	-
Vested		(34,750)		$	2.24
Balance, June 30, 2013		149,154		$	2.77

Unvested Restricted Stock at June 30, 2013

As of June 30, 2013, there was $324 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding RSUs, which the Company expects to recognize over a period of 1.91 years.

XML

Financial Instruments

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Financial Instruments [Abstract]

Financial Instruments

3.      Financial Instruments:

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, notes receivable, accrued expenses and other liabilities approximates fair value due to their relatively short maturity. Prior to February 9, 2010, the Company sold products in various global markets. As a result, the Company was exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. Foreign currency transaction gains and (losses) included in other income (expense), were $0 and $5 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. On June 30, 2013, the Company had no open foreign exchange contracts to sell Euros or any other foreign currencies. On June 30, 2013, the Company had 8,288 liability warrants outstanding with an exercise price of $30.00 expiring in September 2013. The Company recorded a non-cash gain of $3 and $1 in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to these warrants.

Changes in the exchange rate between the Euro and the U.S. dollar are currently immaterial to our operating results. Exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk may increase over time as our business evolves.

The balance in note receivable at June 30, 2013 was $0. In the first quarter of the current fiscal year, the note receivable balance consisted of a loan related to the Company’s investment in CollabRx. After the completion of the acquisition of CollabRx, the note receivable was reclassified to be included as part of the purchase price, thereby extinguishing the $300 bridge loan previously extended to CollabRx. Also as part of the purchase price, the Company assumed $500 of existing CollabRx indebtedness through the issuance of promissory notes. The principal of the promissory notes is payable in equal installments on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of issuance, along with the accrued but unpaid interest as of such dates. See Note 8 CollabRx Acquisition.

On November 22, 2011, the Company completed a $300 strategic investment in NanoVibronix, Inc., a private company that develops medical devices and products that implement its proprietary therapeutic ultrasound technology. The Company’s investment in NanoVibronix is in the form of a convertible promissory note that bears interest at a rate of 10% per year compounded annually and matures on November 15, 2014. Principal and accrued interest under the note automatically convert into shares of Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of NanoVibronix upon the earlier to occur of (i) a $3,000 (or larger) equity financing by NanoVibronix or (ii) a sale of NanoVibronix. In addition, the Company may convert principal and accrued interest under the note into shares of NanoVibronix Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock at its election at any time. In either case, the conversion price is $0.284 per share.

XML

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

6.      Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2012-04, Technical Corrections and Improvements ("ASU 2012-04"), which makes certain technical corrections and “conforming fair value amendments” to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments affect various Codification topics and apply to all reporting entities within the scope of those topics. These provisions of the amendment are effective upon issuance, except for amendments that are subject to transition guidance. The new guidance is effective for fiscal periods after December 15, 2012 and had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The new guidance requires entities to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income unless the amounts are not reclassified in their entirety to net income. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, entities are required to cross-reference other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. The new guidance is effective for fiscal periods after December 15, 2012 and had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 4, Discontinued Operations.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2013-05”). ASU 2013-05 clarifies that when a parent reporting entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business within a foreign entity, the parent is required to apply the guidance in ASC 830-30 to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. ASU 2013-05 is effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The new guidance was adopted early and had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 4, Discontinued Operations.

XML

Discontinued Operations

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Discontinued Operations [Abstract]

Discontinued Operations

4.      Discontinued Operations:

Due to a sharp decline in revenues in its legacy Etch and PVD products as a result of the overall collapse of the semiconductor capital equipment market and global financial crisis in fiscal year 2009, the Company sold its legacy Etch and PVD assets in March 2010. The Company retained the DRIE products which it had acquired from AMMS, along with the Compact™cluster platform and the NLD technology that it had developed over the past several years. As the semiconductor markets recovered, the Company was not in a position to make the needed investments to improve its competitive position. As a result, the Company also sold its DRIE and Compact related assets on February 9, 2011, but retained its NLD intellectual property.

As a result of the sale of the Company’s DRIE assets, and in accordance with GAAP, the DRIE business operations related to the designing, manufacturing, marketing and servicing of systems and parts within the semiconductor industry are presented as discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The exit from the DRIE operation was essentially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of our 2011 fiscal year.

On May 7, 2012, the Company received a VAT refund related to discontinued operations in its former French subsidiary in the amount of 312 Euros. This amount was recognized in other assets of discontinued operations. The settlement of this outstanding amount due was classified as a reduction of assets of discontinued operations. The related foreign exchange gain or loss was classified as a gain or loss on the sale of discontinued operations in the first quarter of the prior fiscal year.

In the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized a cash gain of $20 in discontinued operations as a result of final closing of bank accounts in its Italian subsidiary and a federal tax refund regarding discontinued operations, and a net $4 non cash gain related to the write off of discontinued assets and liabilities in its foreign subsidiaries. The Company also recognized a reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and into Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes. The reclassification is related to the recognition of a non-cash loss of $142 from the foreign exchange differences from its former Tegal foreign subsidiaries, primarily as a result of the final closing the former Tegal German subsidiary. The Company received permission to close the German subsidiary in June 2013. No further audits or reviews are anticipated by foreign taxing authorities.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (Unaudited) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in shares)	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued (in shares)	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	1,952,960	1,952,960
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	1,952,960	1,952,960

XML

Subsequent Events

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

9.   Subsequent Events:

None.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013		Jun. 30, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (797)		$ (679)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Stock compensation expense	84		54
Fair value adjustment of common stock warrants	(3)		(1)
Depreciation	7		3
Amortization of intangible assets	52		0
Accrued interest on note receivable	(8)		(8)
Accrued interest promissory note	1		0
Tax benefit related to intangibles	(20)		0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(20)		0
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(97)		37
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities	53		(102)
Current assets and liabilities from discontinued operations	137		367
Net cash used in operating activities	(611)		(329)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of property and equipment	(4)		0
Issuance of note receivable	0		(300)
Net cash used in investing activities	(4)		(300)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(615)		(629)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	4,039	[1]	7,820
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 3,424		$ 7,191

[1] Derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements.

XML

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 3,424	$ 4,039	[1]
Accounts receivable	270	250	[1]
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	199	102	[1]
Other assets of discontinued operations	0	11	[1]
Total current assets	3,893	4,402	[1]
Property and equipment, net	139	142	[1]
Intangible assets, net	1,438	1,490	[1]
Goodwill	603	603	[1]
Investment in convertible promissory note	353	345	[1]
Total assets	6,426	6,982	[1]
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities	208	167	[1]
Common stock warrant liability	7	10	[1]
Liabilities of discontinued operations	0	16	[1]
Total current liabilities	215	193	[1]
Deferred tax liability	561	581	[1]
Promissory note	505	504	[1]
Other long term liabilities	12	0	[1]
Total liabilities	1,293	1,278	[1]
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding	0	0	[1]
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 1,952,960 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, respectively	19	19	[1]
Additional paid-in capital	130,686	130,602	[1]
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	0	(142)	[1]
Accumulated deficit	(125,572)	(124,775)	[1]
Total stockholders' equity	5,133	5,704	[1]
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 6,426	$ 6,982	[1]

[1] Derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements.

XML

Geographical and Segment Information (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Sales to customers located in [Abstract]
Total sales	$ 270	$ 25
Genomics Based Technology Information [Member]
Sales to customers located in [Abstract]
Total sales	270	0
Solar Power Management Services [Member]
Sales to customers located in [Abstract]
Total sales	$ 0	$ 25

XML

CollabRx Acquisition

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

CollabRx Acquisition [Abstract]

CollabRx Acquisition

8.   CollabRx Acquisition:

On July 12, 2012, we completed the acquisition of CollabRx, pursuant to the previously announced Merger Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2012. In connection with the Merger Agreement and the Employment Agreement dated as of June 29, 2012 by and among the Company and James Karis, on July 12, 2012, Mr. Karis, the former Chief Executive Officer of CollabRx, was appointed the Co-Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. In addition, pursuant to the Indemnity Agreement dated as of July 12, 2012 by and between the Company and James Karis (the “Indemnity Agreement”), Mr. Karis has been granted customary indemnification rights in connection with his position as an officer and director of the Company.

Additional information is set forth in the Company’s 8-K report filed on July 18, 2012, and is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

The allocation of the purchase price for the CollabRx acquisition is set forth in the Company’s Form 10-Q reports filed on November 14, 2012 and February 13, 2013, as well as its Form 10-K report filed on June 27, 2013.

On December 7, 2012, CollabRx and James M. Karis entered into an Amendment No. 1 (the “Employment Agreement Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement dated June 29, 2012 between the Company and Mr. Karis (the “Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to the Employment Agreement Amendment, Mr. Karis resigned as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective December 31, 2012 (the “Termination Date”) but will continue to serve as a director of the Company and provide consulting services to the Company from time to time after the Termination Date. In addition, the Company waived its entitlement to recoup from Mr. Karis his signing bonus and Mr. Karis agreed to amend his RSU Agreement to terminate vesting as of the Termination Date. The Company and Mr. Karis also agreed to a mutual release of claims. The full text of the Employment Agreement Amendment and the RSU Agreement amendment was filed as Exhibit 10.1 and 10.2 to the form 8-K filed on December 7, 2012, and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

CollabRx offers cloud-based expert systems that provide clinically relevant interpretive knowledge to institutions, physicians, researchers and patients for genomics-based medicine in cancer and other diseases to inform health care decision making. With access to over 75 clinical and scientific advisors at leading academic institutions and a suite of tools and processes that combine artificial intelligence-based analytics with proprietary interpretive content, CollabRx is well positioned to participate in the $300 billion value-added “big data” opportunity in the US health care market (as reported by McKinsey Global Institute), over half of which specifically targets areas in cancer and cancer genomics. The Company recognized $20 in tax benefit in the three months ended June 30, 2013 regarding the deferred tax liability related to this acquisition.

XML

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Change in the fair value of warrants

The change in the fair value of warrants is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Balance at the beginning of the period		$	10		$	19
Change in fair value recorded in earnings			(3)			(1)
Balance at the end of the period		$	7		$	18

Valuation assumptions to estimate the fair value of options

The Company utilized the following valuation assumptions to estimate the fair value of options that were granted for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

STOCK OPTIONS:	2013			2012
Expected life (years)		6.0			6.0
Volatility		153.7	%		155.3	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.41	%		0.69	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%

Stock option activity

A summary of the stock option activity during the three months ended June 30, 2013 is as follows:

	Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Beginning outstanding		263,876	$	10.23
Granted		-	$	-
Expected		-	$	-
Ending outstanding		263,876	$	10.23		7.30		$	1,274.00
Ending vested and expected to vest		263,265	$	10.23		7.30		$	1,274.00
Ending exercisable		158,080	$	14.45		6.09		$	1,274.00

Stock options outstanding

The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2013:

Range of Exercise Prices				Number Outstanding As of June 30, 2012		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable As of June 30, 2012		Weighted- Average Exercise Price As of June 30, 2012
$	2.90	$	6.00		164,329		9.06	$	3.81		58,602	$	3.70
	6.25		11.70		45,358		5.39		11.50		45,358		11.50
	17.80		28.10		39,269		4.22		21.63		39,244		21.63
	30.56		61.80		14,006		1.93		43.95		13,998		43.95
	61.94		151.94		854		1.20		88.99		832		89.52
	152.21		285.00		58		0.34		174.08		46		174.00
	286.72		300.27		2		0.00		293.50		-		-
$	2.90	$	300.27		263,876		7.30	$	10.23		158,080	$	14.45

Unvested RSU activity

The following table summarizes the Company’s unvested RSU activity for the three months ended June 30, 2013:

	Number		Weighted- Average
	of		Grant Date
	Shares		Fair Value
Balance March 31, 2013		183,904		$	2.67
Granted		-		$	-
Forfeited		-		$	-
Vested		(34,750)		$	2.24
Balance, June 30, 2013		149,154		$	2.77

XML

Investments

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Investments [Abstract]

Investments

7.   Investments:

The NanoVibronix Transaction

On November 22, 2011, the Company completed a $300 strategic investment in NanoVibronix, a private company that develops medical devices and products that implement its proprietary therapeutic ultrasound technology. NanoVibronix is focused on creating products utilizing its proprietary low-intensity surface acoustic wave (“SAW”) technology. The company's unique, patented approach enables the transmission of low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound waves through a variety of soft, flexible materials, including skin and tissue, enabling low-cost, breakthrough devices targeted at large, high-growth markets. A copy of the Company’s press release was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2011 and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Company’s investment in NanoVibronix is in the form of a convertible promissory note that bears interest at a rate of 10% per year compounded annually and matures on November 15, 2014. Principal and accrued interest under the note automatically convert into shares of Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of NanoVibronix upon the earlier to occur of (i) a $3,000 (or larger) equity financing by NanoVibronix or (ii) a sale of NanoVibronix. In addition, the Company may convert principal and accrued interest under the note into shares of NanoVibronix Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock at its election at any time. In either case, the conversion price is $0.284 per share.

XML

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Earnings Per Share (EPS) [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share (EPS)

2.      Earnings Per Share (EPS):

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders (numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) for the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted EPS uses the average market prices during the period.

Basic net loss per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding.

The following table represents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per common share:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
Loss from continuing operations	$	(679)	$	(678)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		(118)		(1)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders	$	(797)	$	(679)
Basic and diluted:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding		1,953		1,689
Weighted-average common shares used in per share computation		1,953		1,689
Net loss per share from continuing operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.35)	$	(0.40)
Net loss per share from discontinued operations:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.06)	$	(0.00)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.41)	$	(0.40)

Outstanding options, RSUs and ESPP’s of 414,236 and 374,833 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price per share of $10.35 and $8.80 on June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share for the three month periods presented as a result of their anti-dilutive effect. Also, 8,288 liability warrants with an average exercise price of $30.00 and warrants to purchase 92,888 shares of common stock with an average exercise price of $3.15 per share were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share. Such securities could potentially dilute earnings per share in future periods.

XML

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)	0 Months Ended		3 Months Ended				3 Months Ended												0 Months Ended		3 Months Ended			3 Months Ended						12 Months Ended
	Jul. 12, 2012	Nov. 22, 2011	Jun. 30, 2013 ClinicalandScientificAdvisor	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2013		Jun. 30, 2013 Range $2.90 to $6.00 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Range $6.25 to $11.70 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Range $17.80 to $28.10 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Range $30.56 to $61.80 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Range $61.94 to $151.94 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Range $152.21 to $285 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Range $286.72 to $300.27 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Range $2.90 to $300.27 [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Stock Options [Member]	Jun. 30, 2012 Stock Options [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]	Jan. 14, 2011 Sequel Power [Member]	Mar. 21, 2013 Se2quel Partners [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Minimum [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Minimum [Member] Patents [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Minimum [Member] Trademarks [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Maximum [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Maximum [Member] Patents [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Maximum [Member] Trademarks [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Revenue [Member] Life Technologies [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Revenue [Member] Everyday Health [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Accounts Receivable [Member] Life Technologies [Member]	Jun. 30, 2013 Accounts Receivable [Member] Everyday Health [Member]	Mar. 31, 2013 Nanolayer Deposition Technology [Member]
Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Net loss			$ 797,000	$ 679,000
Net cash used in operating activities			611,000	329,000
Number of clinical and scientific advisors			75
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Proceeds from the sale of NLD patents																														3,750,000
Discontinued operation, foreign currency translation			142,000
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration risk (in hundredths)																										93.00%	7.00%	93.00%	7.00%
Promissory Note [Abstract]
Business acquisition effective date	Jul. 12, 2012		Jul. 12, 2012
Promissory note assumed	500,000		500,000
Note receivable used as consideration for CollabRx acquisition		300,000
Interest rate on promissory note (in hundredths)		10.00%
Promissory note maturity date		Nov. 15, 2014
Minimum equity financing amount consider for conversion of notes		3,000,000
Conversion price (in dollars per share)		$ 0.284
Investment in convertible promissory note			353,000		345,000	[1]
Accrued interest on note receivable			53,000		45,000
Class of Warrant or Right [Line Items]
Warrants outstanding to purchase shares of common stock (in shares)			285,454
Exercise price of warrants (in dollars per share)																				$ 30.00			$ 495.00
Investment warrants expiration date range start			Feb. 01, 2010
Investment warrants expiration date range end			Sep. 01, 2013
Reclassification from additional paid in capital to beginning accumulated deficit			346,000
Reclassification from additional paid in capital to common stock warrant liability			502,000
Fair value of warrants			7,000
Fair value assumptions, risk free interest rate (in hundredths)			1.41%
Fair value assumptions, expected term			2 months 8 days
Fair value assumptions, weighted average volatility rate (in hundredths)			153.70%
Fair value assumptions, expected dividend rate (in hundredths)			0.00%
Non cash gains on warrants			3,000	1,000
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Equity investment																		2,000,000
Ownership interest (in hundredths)																		25.00%
Warrants cancelled (in shares)																			44,578
Warrants outstanding (in shares)																			92,888
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate [Abstract]
Estimated useful life of the underlying intangibles			10 years																		3 years	3 years		10 years	10 years
Change in the fair value of warrants [Abstract]
Balance at the beginning of the period			10,000	19,000
Change in fair value recorded in earnings			(3,000)	(1,000)
Balance at the end of the period			7,000	18,000
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Useful life			10 years																		3 years	3 years		10 years	10 years
Amortization of intangible assets			52,000	0
Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]
Vesting period of equity awards			4 years
Stock options expiry period			10 years
Purchase price of shares to fair market value (in hundredths)			85.00%
Total stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock units			84,000	54,000
Total compensation expense related to non-vested stock options and RSUs not yet recognized			559,000
Valuation assumptions to estimate the fair value of options and ESPP [Abstract]
Expected life (years)															6 years	6 years
Volatility (in hundredths)															153.70%	155.30%
Risk-free interest rate (in hundredths)															1.41%	0.69%
Dividend yield (in hundredths)															0.00%	0.00%
Stock option and warrant activity [Roll Forward]
Beginning outstanding (in shares)															263,876
Granted (in shares)															0
Expected (in shares)															0
Ending outstanding (in shares)															263,876
Ending vested and expected to vest (in shares)															263,265
Ending exercisable (in shares)															158,080
Weighted Average Exercise Price [Abstract]
Beginning outstanding (in dollars per share)															$ 10.23
Granted (in dollars per share)															$ 0
Expired (in dollars per share)															$ 0
Ending outstanding (in dollars per share)															$ 10.23
Ending vested and expected to vest (in dollars per share)															$ 10.23
Ending exercisable (in dollars per share)															$ 14.45
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term [Abstract]
Ending outstanding															7 years 3 months 18 days
Ending vested and expected to vest															7 years 3 months 18 days
Ending exercisable															6 years 1 month 2 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value [Abstract]
Ending outstanding															1,274,000
Ending vested and expected to vest															1,274,000
Ending exercisable															1,274,000
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options and warrants			235,000
Period of recognition of total unrecognized compensation cost related to options outstanding			3 years														1 year 10 months 28 days
Number of Shares [Abstract]
Balance, March 31, 2012 (in shares)																	183,904
Granted (in shares)																	0
Forfeited (in shares)																	0
Vested (in shares)																	(34,750)
Balance, Dec. 31, 2012 (in shares)																	149,154
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value [Abstract]
Balance March 31, 2013 (in dollars per share)																	$ 2.67
Granted (in dollars per share)																	$ 0
Forfeited (in dollars per share)																	$ 0
Vested (in dollars per share)																	$ 2.24
Balance, June 30, 2013 (in dollars per share)																	$ 2.77
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding RSUs																	$ 324,000
Period of recognition of total unrecognized compensation cost			3 years														1 year 10 months 28 days
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Range of Exercise Prices, Lower Range Limit (in dollars per share)							$ 2.90	$ 6.25	$ 17.80	$ 30.56	$ 61.94	$ 152.21	$ 286.72	$ 2.90
Range of Exercise Prices, Upper Range Limit (in dollars per share)							$ 6.00	$ 11.70	$ 28.10	$ 61.80	$ 151.94	$ 285.00	$ 300.27	$ 300.27
Number Outstanding (in shares)							164,329	45,358	39,269	14,006	854	58	2	263,876
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term							9 years 0 months 22 days	5 years 4 months 20 days	4 years 2 months 19 days	1 year 11 months 5 days	1 year 2 months 12 days	4 months 2 days		7 years 3 months 18 days
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)							$ 3.81	$ 11.50	$ 21.63	$ 43.95	$ 88.99	$ 174.08	$ 293.50	$ 10.23
Number Exercisable (in shares)							58,602	45,358	39,244	13,998	832	46	0	158,080
Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)							$ 3.70	$ 11.50	$ 21.63	$ 43.95	$ 89.52	$ 174.00	$ 0	$ 14.45

[1] Derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements.

XML

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued Operations

Since 2009, the Company has engaged in a process of transitioning away from its legacy lines of business in semiconductor capital equipment. As a result of the sale of the Company’s Deep Reactive Ion Etch (“DRIE”) assets in the fiscal year 2011, and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the DRIE business operations related to the designing, manufacturing, marketing and servicing of systems and parts within the semiconductor industry has been presented in discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated financial statements. The exit from the DRIE operation was essentially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of our 2011 fiscal year. However, the Company retained its intellectual property portfolio for Nanolayer Deposition Technology (“NLD”). During fiscal year 2012, the Company, as part of its proposed sale of its NLD portfolio, completed the sale transactions of two of four patent lots for approximately $3,750. The Company continues to market the remaining lots to independent third parties.

The Company recognized a reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and into Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes. The reclassification is related to the recognition of a non-cash loss of $142 of foreign exchange differences from its former Tegal foreign subsidiaries, primarily as a result of the final closing of the former Tegal German subsidiary. The Company received permission to close the German subsidiary in June 2013. No further audits or reviews are anticipated by foreign taxing authorities.

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the March 31, 2013 audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the information set forth herein. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), but omit certain information and footnote disclosures necessary to present the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. The results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could vary from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments. The Company’s accounts receivable balance is also subject to credit risk. Substantially all of the Company’s liquid investments are invested in money market funds. The Company’s accounts receivable are derived primarily from sales to customers located in the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally requires no collateral. The Company no longer maintains reserves for potential credit losses. There have been no write-offs during the periods presented.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, Sequel Power, LLC (“Sequel Power”) accounted for all the Company’s revenue. As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2013, Life Technologies and Everyday Health accounted for 93% and 7%, respectively, of the Company’s revenue and accounts receivable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments having a maturity of three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

At June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, all of the Company’s current investments are classified as cash equivalents in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 the fair value of the Company’s investments approximated cost.

Promissory Notes

Promissory Notes

On July 12, 2012, Tegal completed the acquisition of CollabRx. As part of the purchase price, Tegal issued promissory notes in the amount of $500 in exchange for the existing CollabRx indebtedness. The principal amount of the promissory notes is payable in equal installments on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of issuance, along with the accrued but unpaid interest as of such dates. See Note 8, CollabRx Acquisition.

On November 22, 2011, the Company completed a $300 strategic investment in NanoVibronix, Inc., (“NanoVibronix”) a private company that develops medical devices and products that implement its proprietary therapeutic ultrasound technology. The Company’s investment in NanoVibronix is in the form of a convertible promissory note that bears interest at a rate of 10% per year compounded annually and matures on November 15, 2014. Principal and accrued interest under the convertible promissory note automatically converts into shares of Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of NanoVibronix upon the earlier to occur of (i) a $3,000 (or larger) equity financing by NanoVibronix or (ii) a sale of NanoVibronix. In addition, the Company may convert principal and accrued interest under the convertible promissory note into shares of NanoVibronix Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock at its election at any time. In either case, the conversion price is $0.284 per share.

As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the Convertible Promissory Note balance was $353 and $345, respectively, consisting of the original $300 investment and $53 and $45, respectively, in accrued interest.

Accounts Receivable - Allowance for Sales Returns and Doubtful Accounts

Accounts Receivable – Allowance for Sales Returns and Doubtful Accounts

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the Company had zero reserves for potential credit losses as such risk was determined to be immaterial. The Company had zero write-offs during the periods presented. The Company historically maintained an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of the Company’s customers to make required payments for system sales.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Each contract sale of our interpretive data is evaluated individually in regard to revenue recognition. We have integrated in our evaluation the related guidance included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605 – “Revenue Recognition”. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the seller’s price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

For arrangements that include multiple deliverables, we identify separate units of accounting based on the guidance under ASC 605-25 “Multiple Element Arrangements”, which provides that revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables should be divided into separate units of accounting, if certain criteria are met. The consideration of the arrangement is allocated to the separate units of accounting using the relative selling price method. Applicable revenue recognition criteria are considered separately for each separate unit of accounting.

Revenue from fixed price contracts is recognized primarily under the percentage of completion method. Under this method we recognize estimated contract revenue and resulting income based on costs incurred to date as a percentage of the total estimated costs as we consider this model to best reflect the economics of these contracts. In such contracts, the Company’s efforts, measured by time incurred, typically represents the contractual milestones or output measure. If at any time during the contract period, we determine that a loss will occur, we recognize the loss in that period. Furthermore, if in previous periods a profit was recognized under the percentage-of completion method, the profit would be reversed during the periodwe determined a loss on the contract exists.

Derivative Instruments

Derivative Instruments

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB“) ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) consensus on EITF Issue No. 07-05, Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock (“EITF Issue 07-05”) (Topic 815) which applies to the determination of whether any freestanding financial instruments or embedded features that have the characteristics of a derivative, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133 (Topic 815), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and to any freestanding financial instruments are potentially indexed to an entity’s own common stock. EITF Issue No. 07-05 (Topic 815) became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted Topic 815 as of April 1, 2009. As a result, warrants to purchase 285,454 shares of our common stock previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative treatment exemption were no longer afforded equity treatment. The warrants had exercise prices ranging from $30.00-$495.00 and expired or will expire between February 2010 and September 2013. As such, effective April 1, 2009, the Company reclassified the fair value of these warrants, which had exercise price reset features, from equity to liability status as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability since their date of issue between February 2000 and January 2006. On April 1, 2009, the Company reclassified $346 from additional paid-in capital, as a cumulative effect adjustment, to beginning accumulated deficit, and $502 to common stock warrant liability to recognize the fair value of such warrants on such date. At June 30, 2013, the fair value of the warrants was $7, which was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.41%; expected life of 0.19 years; an expected volatility factor of 153.7%; and a dividend yield of 0.0%. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, the Company recorded non-cash gains of $3 and $1 related to these warrants.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

      We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740 – “Income Taxes”, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. Under ASC 740, the liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We evaluate annually the realizability of our deferred tax assets by assessing our valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization include our forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. In 2013 and 2012, we have recorded a full valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets based on our past losses and uncertainty regarding our ability to project future taxable income. In future periods, if we are able to generate income we may reduce or eliminate the valuation allowance.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

Sequel Power

On January 14, 2011, we entered into a Formation and Contribution Agreement with se2quel Partners and Sequel Power. We contributed $2 million in cash to Sequel Power and issued warrants to purchase shares of our common stock in exchange for an approximate 25% ownership interest in Sequel Power. Sequel Power was focused on the promotion of solar power plant development projects worldwide. The management services provided to Sequel Power represented the Company’s sole source of revenue for fiscal 2012. We impaired the entire book value of our investment in Sequel Power on March 31, 2012. On March 21, 2013, Sequel Power and se2quel Partners irrevocably assigned and transferred to the Company for cancelation the balance of Sequel Power’s warrants representing the right to purchase 44,578 shares of the Company’s common stock, leaving a balance of 92,888 warrants still outstanding. In exchange, we agreed to terminate our Management Services Agreement and to waive receivables related to accrued fees thereunder. We do not anticipate making any additional investments in Sequel Power or any other solar-related businesses.

Management evaluates our joint venture arrangements to determine whether they should be recorded on a consolidated basis. The percentage of ownership interest in the joint venture, an evaluation of control and whether a variable interest entity (“VIE”) exists are all considered in the consolidation assessment.

We account for our investment in joint ventures where we own a non-controlling interest or where we are not the primary beneficiary of a VIE using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, our cost of investment is adjusted for our share of equity in the earnings of the unconsolidated affiliate and reduced by distributions received.

Any differences between the cost of our investment in an unconsolidated affiliate and our underlying equity as reflected in the unconsolidated affiliate’s financial statements generally result from a different basis in assets contributed to the joint venture. The net difference between our investment in unconsolidated affiliates and the underlying equity of unconsolidated affiliates is generally amortized over a period of ten years, which was determined to be the estimated useful life of the underlying intangibles which created the difference in carrying amount.

On a periodic basis, we assess whether there are any indicators that the fair value of our investments in unconsolidated affiliates may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if our estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment, and such decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment. Our estimates of fair value for each investment are based on a number of assumptions such as future revenue projections, operating forecasts, discount rates and capitalization rates, among others. These assumptions are subject to economic and market uncertainties. As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter our assumptions, the fair values estimated in the impairment analyses may not be realized.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and we consider what assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

· Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities.

· Level 2: Directly or indirectly observable inputs as of the reporting date through correlation with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data from actively quoted markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

· Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of money market funds. At June 30, 2013, all of our investments were classified as cash equivalents in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The carrying amounts of our cash equivalents are valued using Level 1 inputs. The value of our warrant liability is determined using Level 3 inputs. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as its method of valuation for warrants that are subject warrant liability accounting. The determination of the fair value as of the reporting date is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables which could provide differing variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, expected stock price volatility over the term of the security and risk free interest rate. In addition, the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the input of an expected life for the securities for which we have estimated based upon the stage of the Company’s development. The fair value of the warrant liability is revalued each balance sheet date utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model computations with the decrease or increase in the fair value being reported in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss as other income, net. A significant increase (decrease) of any of the subjective variables independent of other changes would result in a correlated increase (decrease) in the liability and an inverse effect on net income.

The change in the fair value of warrants is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Balance at the beginning of the period		$	10		$	19
Change in fair value recorded in earnings			(3)			(1)
Balance at the end of the period		$	7		$	18

Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include patents, trade names, software, non-compete agreements, customer relationships and trademarks that are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three to ten years. The Company performs an ongoing review of its identified intangible assets to determine if facts and circumstances exist that indicate the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If such facts and circumstances exist, the Company assesses the recoverability of identified intangible assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flow associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. As of the current reporting period, the Company’s remaining intangible assets, not including those related to the acquisition of CollabRx, were internally developed, which have a carrying value of zero.

During fiscal year 2012, the Company, as part of its proposed sale of its intellectual property portfolio for Nanolayer Deposition Technology (“NLD”), completed the sale of two of the four lots for the received purchase price of approximately $3,750. The Company continues to market the remaining patents to independent third parties. NLD is a process technology that bridges the gap between high throughput, non-conformal chemical vapor deposition (“CVD”) and highly conformal, low throughput atomic layer deposition (“ALD”). The entire portfolio included over 35 US and international patents in the areas of pulsed-CVD, plasma-enhanced ALD, and NLD.

With the acquisition of CollabRx, the Company acquired software, trade names, customer relationships, non-compete agreements and goodwill. The lives of the acquired intangible assets range from three to ten years. Intangible assets, except for trade names, are amortized on a straight-line basis. Intangible assets related to trade names are not amortized. The Company tests for impairment at least annually. The fair values of these assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount might not be recoverable. If undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss will be recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. The amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, was $52 and $0. The amortization expense included in cost of revenue is related to the acquired software and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the asset, which the Company believes to be ten years.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, as well as at fiscal year end. If undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.

The Company recorded zero disposal losses for fixed assets for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

We have adopted several stock plans that provide for issuance of equity instruments to our employees and non-employee directors. Our plans include incentive and non-statutory stock options and restricted stock awards. These equity awards generally vest ratably over a four-year period on the anniversary date of the grant, and stock options expire ten years after the grant date. Certain restricted stock awards may vest on the achievement of specific performance targets. We also have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) that allows qualified employees to purchase Company shares at 85% of the fair market value on specified dates.

Total stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $84 and $54, respectively. The total compensation expense related to non-vested stock options and RSUs not yet recognized at June 30, 2013 is $559.

The Company utilized the following valuation assumptions to estimate the fair value of options that were granted for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

STOCK OPTIONS:	2013			2012
Expected life (years)		6.0			6.0
Volatility		153.7	%		155.3	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.41	%		0.69	%
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%

ESPP awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with expected volatility calculated using a six-month historical volatility. No ESPP awards were made in the three month period ended June 30, 2013.

Valuation and Other Assumptions for Stock Options

Valuation and Amortization Method. We estimate the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We estimate the fair value using a single option approach and amortize the fair value on a straight-line basis for options expected to vest. All options are amortized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods.

Expected Term. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that the options are expected to be outstanding. We estimate the expected term of options granted based on our historical experience of exercises including post-vesting exercises and termination.

Expected Volatility. We estimate the volatility of our stock options at the date of grant using historical volatilities. Historical volatilities are calculated based on the historical prices of our common stock over a period at least equal to the expected term of our option grants.

Risk-Free Interest Rate. We base the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the implied yield in effect at the time of option grant on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms equivalent to the expected term of our option grants.

Dividends. We have never paid any cash dividends on common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Forfeitures. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures. We record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company granted no options.

Stock Options

A summary of the stock option activity during the three months ended June 30, 2013 is as follows:

	Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Beginning outstanding		263,876	$	10.23
Granted		-	$	-
Expected		-	$	-
Ending outstanding		263,876	$	10.23		7.30		$	1,274.00
Ending vested and expected to vest		263,265	$	10.23		7.30		$	1,274.00
Ending exercisable		158,080	$	14.45		6.09		$	1,274.00

The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding at June 30, 2013 is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the market price of our common stock as of June 30, 2013.

The following table summarizes information with respect to stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2013:

Range of Exercise Prices				Number Outstanding As of June 30, 2012		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable As of June 30, 2012		Weighted- Average Exercise Price As of June 30, 2012
$	2.90	$	6.00		164,329		9.06	$	3.81		58,602	$	3.70
	6.25		11.70		45,358		5.39		11.50		45,358		11.50
	17.80		28.10		39,269		4.22		21.63		39,244		21.63
	30.56		61.80		14,006		1.93		43.95		13,998		43.95
	61.94		151.94		854		1.20		88.99		832		89.52
	152.21		285.00		58		0.34		174.08		46		174.00
	286.72		300.27		2		0.00		293.50		-		-
$	2.90	$	300.27		263,876		7.30	$	10.23		158,080	$	14.45

As of June 30, 2013, there was $235 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options which the Company expects to recognize over a period of 3.0 years.

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes the Company’s unvested RSU activity for the three months ended June 30, 2013:

	Number		Weighted- Average
	of		Grant Date
	Shares		Fair Value
Balance March 31, 2013		183,904		$	2.67
Granted		-		$	-
Forfeited		-		$	-
Vested		(34,750)		$	2.24
Balance, June 30, 2013		149,154		$	2.77

Unvested Restricted Stock at June 30, 2013

As of June 30, 2013, there was $324 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding RSUs, which the Company expects to recognize over a period of 1.91 years.

XML

Discontinued Operations (Details)	0 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	May 07, 2012 EUR (€)	Jun. 30, 2013 USD ($)
Liabilities of Discontinued Operation [Abstract]
Tax refund related to discontinued operations	€ 0.312
Cash gain from discontinued operations		20,000
Non cash gain related to write off of discontinued assets and liabilities		4,000
Non cash loss from the foreign exchange differences		$ 142,000

XML

Earnings Per Share (EPS) (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Earnings Per Share (EPS) [Abstract]
Loss from continuing operations	$ (679)	$ (678)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes	(118)	(1)
Net loss applicable to common stockholders	$ (797)	$ (679)
Basic and diluted [Abstract]
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in shares)	1,953	1,689
Weighted-average common shares used in per share computation (in shares)	1,953,000	1,689,000
Net loss per share [Abstract]
Basic and diluted - Continuing operations (in dollars per share)	$ (0.35)	$ (0.40)
Basic and diluted - Discontinued operations (in dollars per share)	$ (0.06)	$ 0
Basic and diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (0.41)	$ (0.40)
Options, RSUs and ESPP's [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Securities not included in the computation of diluted net (loss) income per common share (in shares)	414,236	374,833
Weighted average exercise price of options, RSUs and ESPP's (in dollars per share)	$ 10.35	$ 8.80
Liability Warrants [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Securities not included in the computation of diluted net (loss) income per common share (in shares)	8,288
Weighted average exercise price of options, RSUs and ESPP's (in dollars per share)	$ 30.00
Warrants [Member]
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Securities not included in the computation of diluted net (loss) income per common share (in shares)		92,888
Weighted average exercise price of options, RSUs and ESPP's (in dollars per share)		$ 3.15

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Aug. 06, 2013
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	CollabRx, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0000931059
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--03-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		1,952,960
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2013

XML

Financial Instruments (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013 Contract	Jun. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2013		Jul. 12, 2012	Nov. 22, 2011
Financial Instruments [Abstract]
Foreign currency transaction gains and (losses)	$ 0	$ 5
Number of open foreign exchange contracts	0
Class of Warrant or Right [Line Items]
Warrants outstanding (in shares)	285,454
Non cash gains on warrants	3	1
Note receivable - CollabRx	0
Debt extinguishment as a consideration of acquisition	300
Promissory note liability assumed as a purchase price of acquisition	500				500
Investment [Line Items]
Strategic investment	353		345	[1]
Conversion price (in dollars per share)						$ 0.284
Nano Vibronix [Member]
Investment [Line Items]
Maturity date of convertible promissory note	Nov. 15, 2014
Convertible preferred stock	3,000
Conversion price (in dollars per share)	$ 0.284
Nano Vibronix [Member] | Convertible Promissory Note [Member]
Investment [Line Items]
Strategic investment						$ 300
Interest rate on convertible promissory note (in hundredths)	10.00%
Liability Warrants Having Exercise Price 30 [Member]
Class of Warrant or Right [Line Items]
Warrants outstanding (in shares)	8,288
Exercise price of warrants outstanding (in dollars per share)	$ 30.00

[1] Derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements.