Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments

Kforce leases office space and operating assets under operating and capital leases expiring at various dates, with some leases cancelable upon 30 to 90 days’ notice and with some leases containing escalation in rent clauses. In addition to rental payments, certain leases require payments for taxes, insurance and maintenance costs.

Future minimum lease payments, inclusive of accelerated lease payments, under non-cancelable capital and operating leases are summarized as follows (in thousands):



	2018		2019		2020		2021		2022		Thereafter		Total
Capital leases
Present value of payments	$	1,140	$	334	$	115	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	1,594
Interest	219		140		5		—		—		—		364
Total Capital lease payments	$	1,359	$	474	$	120	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	1,958
Operating leases
Facilities	$	9,331	$	7,642	$	4,764	$	1,937	$	772	$	1,447	$	25,893
Furniture and equipment	7		7		7		7		7		—		35
Total Operating lease payments	$	9,338	$	7,649	$	4,771	$	1,944	$	779	$	1,447	$	25,928
Total Lease payments	$	10,697	$	8,123	$	4,891	$	1,949	$	779	$	1,447	$	27,886

The present value of the minimum lease payments for capital lease obligations has been classified in Other current liabilities and Long-term debt – other in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, according to their respective maturities. Rental expense under operating leases was $7.7 million, $7.7 million and $6.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Purchase Commitments

Kforce has various commitments to purchase goods and services in the ordinary course of business. These commitments are primarily related to software and online application licenses and hosting. As of December 31, 2017, these purchase commitments amounted to approximately $14.5 million and are expected to be paid as follows: $8.6 million in 2018; $4.5 million in 2019; and $1.4 million in 2020.

Letters of Credit

Kforce provides letters of credit to certain vendors in lieu of cash deposits. At December 31, 2017, Kforce had letters of credit outstanding for workers’ compensation and other insurance coverage totaling $2.9 million, and for facility lease deposits totaling $0.3 million.

Litigation

We are involved in legal proceedings, claims, and administrative matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We have made accruals with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, that are reflected in our consolidated financial statements but are not, individually or in the aggregate, considered material. For other matters for which an accrual has not been made, we have not yet determined that a loss is probable or the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated. While the ultimate outcome of the matters cannot be determined, we currently do not expect that these proceedings and claims, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, however, and if decided adversely to us, or if we determine that settlement of particular litigation is appropriate, we may be subject to liability that could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Kforce maintains liability insurance in amounts and with such coverage and deductibles as management believes is reasonable. The principal liability risks that Kforce insures against are workers’ compensation, personal injury, bodily injury, property damage, directors’ and officers’ liability, errors and omissions, cyber liability, employment practices liability and fidelity losses. There can be no assurance that Kforce’s liability insurance will cover all events or that the limits of coverage will be sufficient to fully cover all liabilities. Accordingly, we disclose matters below for which a material loss is reasonably possible.

On August 25, 2016, Kforce Flexible Solutions LLC (along with co-defendant BMO Harris Bank) was served with a complaint brought in the Northern District of Illinois, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Illinois; Shepard v. BMO Harris Bank N.A. et al., Case No.: 1:16-cv-08288. The plaintiff purports to bring claims on her own behalf and on behalf of a putative class of telephone-dedicated workers for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Illinois Minimum Wage Law, and the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act based upon the defendants’ purported failure to pay her and other class members all earned regular and overtime pay for all time worked. More specifically, the plaintiff alleges that class employees were required to perform unpaid work before and after the start and end times of their shifts. She seeks unpaid back regular and overtime wages, liquidated damages, statutory penalties, and attorney fees and costs. On February 15, 2018, the judge granted final approval of the parties’ agreed resolution and the case will be dismissed following implementation of the parties’ settlement. This matter was resolved without any material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Employment Agreements

Kforce has entered into employment agreements with certain executives that provide for minimum compensation, salary and continuation of certain benefits for a six-month to a three-year period after their employment ends under certain circumstances. Certain of the agreements also provide for a severance payment of one to three times annual salary and one-half to three times average annual bonus if such an agreement is terminated without good cause by Kforce or for good reason by the executive. These agreements contain certain post-employment restrictive covenants. Kforce’s liability at December 31, 2017 would be approximately $32.7 million if, following a change in control, all of the executives under contract were terminated without good cause by the employer or if the executives resigned for good reason and $12.7 million if, in the absence of a change in control, all of the executives under contract were terminated by Kforce without good cause or if the executives resigned for good reason. As of December 31, 2017, approximately $0.6 million of severance was accrued for two former executives.