XML 28 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The following table contains a disclosure of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in total and for each reporting unit for the two years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
 
 
Technology
 
Finance and
Accounting
 
Health
Information
Management
 
Government
Solutions
 
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2013
$
17,034

 
$
8,006

 
$
4,887

 
$
18,973

 
$
48,900

Additions (a)

 

 

 
1,955

 
1,955

Disposition of HIM (b)

 

 
(4,887
)
 

 
(4,887
)
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
17,034

 
$
8,006

 
$

 
$
20,928

 
$
45,968

Balance as of December 31, 2015
$
17,034

 
$
8,006

 
$

 
$
20,928

 
$
45,968

(a)
The increase is due to a non-significant acquisition of a business within our GS reporting unit in the fourth quarter of 2014.
(b)
The decrease is due to the disposition of our HIM reporting segment. See Note 2 – “Discontinued Operations” for additional discussion.
Throughout 2015, we considered the qualitative and quantitative factors associated with each of our reporting units and determined that there was no indication that the carrying values of any of our reporting units were likely impaired.
Kforce performed its annual impairment assessment of the carrying value of goodwill as of December 31, 2015. For our Technology and Finance and Accounting reporting units, we assessed qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units was less than its carrying amount. We concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of these reporting units was more than their carrying amounts.
For our GS reporting unit, we compared its carrying value to the estimated fair value based on a weighting of both the income approach and market approaches. Discounted cash flows, which serve as the primary basis for the income approach, were based on a discrete financial forecast which was developed by management for planning purposes and was consistent with those distributed within Kforce. Cash flows beyond the discrete forecast period of five years were estimated using a terminal value calculation, which incorporated historical and forecasted financial trends and also considered long-term earnings growth rates for publicly-traded peer companies, as well as the risk-free rate of return. The discrete financial forecast includes certain adjustments of costs that Kforce believes a market participant buyer, such as a large government contractor, would incur to operate the GS reporting unit. The market approaches consist of: (1) the guideline company method and (2) the guideline transaction method. The guideline company method applies pricing multiples derived from publicly-traded guideline companies that are comparable to the reporting unit to determine its value. The guideline transaction method applies pricing multiples derived from recently completed acquisitions that we believe are reasonably comparable to the reporting unit to determine fair value. Our assessment indicated that the fair value of the GS reporting unit exceeded its carrying value.
Based on our impairment assessments results, no impairment charges were recognized for the Tech, FA and GS reporting units during the year ended December 31, 2015.
For the impairment test performed as of December 31, 2014, Kforce performed a step 1 analysis for each reporting unit and compared the carrying value of Tech, FA and GS to the respective estimated fair values. Kforce concluded there were no indications of impairment for its reporting units during the December 31, 2014 annual impairment tests and as a result no impairment charges were recognized.
For the impairment tests performed as of December 31, 2013, for our Tech and FA reporting units, we assessed qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units was less than its carrying amount. We concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of these reporting units was more than its carrying amount. During the fourth quarter of 2013, Kforce management made a strategic business decision with regard to the GS segment to focus its service offerings and efforts on prime integrated business solutions. Upon completion of the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis as of December 31, 2013 for our GS reporting unit, it was determined that there was an indication of impairment. Because indicators of impairment existed, we performed the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis. The goodwill impairment loss for the reporting unit was measured by the amount the carrying value of goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of the goodwill. Based on this assessment, we recorded an impairment charge of $14.5 million which is presented separately in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. A tax benefit in the amount of $5.2 million was recorded related to the goodwill impairment charge.
Total goodwill impairment for the years ending December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was nil, nil and $14.5 million, respectively. The following table contains a disclosure of the gross amount and accumulated impairment losses of goodwill for Tech, FA and GS reporting units for the three years ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 
Goodwill Carrying Value by Reporting Unit as of:
 
December 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
Technology
 
 
 
 
 
Gross amount
$
156,391

 
$
156,391

 
$
156,391

Accumulated impairment losses
(139,357
)
 
(139,357
)
 
(139,357
)
Carrying value
$
17,034

 
$
17,034

 
$
17,034

Finance and Accounting
 
 
 
 
 
Gross amount
$
19,766

 
$
19,766

 
$
19,766

Accumulated impairment losses
(11,760
)
 
(11,760
)
 
(11,760
)
Carrying value
$
8,006

 
$
8,006

 
$
8,006

Government Solutions
 
 
 
 
 
Gross amount
$
104,596

 
$
104,596

 
$
102,641

Accumulated impairment losses
(83,668
)
 
(83,668
)
 
(83,668
)
Carrying value
$
20,928

 
$
20,928

 
$
18,973


Other Intangible Assets
The gross and net carrying values of intangible assets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, by major intangible asset class, are as follows (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Definite-lived intangible assets
 
 
 
Customer relationships, customer contracts, technology and other
 
 
 
Gross amount
$
28,603

 
$
28,603

Accumulated amortization
(26,608
)
 
(25,832
)
Carrying value
$
1,995

 
$
2,771

Indefinite-lived intangible assets
 
 
 
Trade name and trademark carrying value
$
2,240

 
$
2,240


Amortization expense on intangible assets for each of the three years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013 was $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Amortization expense for 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and thereafter is expected to be approximately $0.6 million, $0.3 million, $0.3 million, $0.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
There was no impairment expense related to indefinite-lived intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 or 2013.