XML 46 R28.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Taxes
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Taxes
Taxes
Components of our net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are presented in the following table.
Table 21.1 – Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities)
(In Thousands)
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Deferred Tax Assets
 
 
 
 
Net operating loss carryforward – state
 
$
89,350

 
$
95,972

Net capital loss carryforward – state
 
15,346

 
22,603

Net operating loss carryforward – federal
 
9,537

 
32,929

Net capital loss carryforward – federal
 
2,283

 
7,971

Real estate assets
 
5,601

 
5,144

Interest rate agreements
 

 
1,472

Allowances and accruals
 
3,059

 
3,458

Other
 
2,192

 
513

Total Deferred Tax Assets
 
127,368

 
170,062

Deferred Tax Liabilities
 
 
 
 
Mortgage Servicing Rights
 
(22,531
)
 
(50,630
)
Interest rate agreements
 
(2,167
)
 

Tax effect of unrealized gains – OCI
 
(1,636
)
 
(2,638
)
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
 
(26,334
)
 
(53,268
)
Valuation allowance
 
(101,932
)
 
(116,794
)
Total Deferred Tax Asset (Liability), net of Valuation Allowance
 
$
(898
)
 
$


The deferred tax assets and liabilities reported above, with the exception of the state net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards, relate solely to our TRS. For state purposes, the REIT files a unitary combined return with its TRS. Because the REIT may have state taxable income apportioned to it from the activity of its TRS, we report the entire combined unitary state net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards as deferred tax assets, including the carryforwards allocated to the REIT.
Realization of our deferred tax assets ("DTAs") at December 31, 2016, is dependent on many factors, including generating sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of NOL carryforwards and generating sufficient capital gains in future periods prior to the expiration of capital loss carryforwards. We determine the extent to which realization of the deferred assets is not assured and establish a valuation allowance accordingly.
As a result of GAAP income generated at our TRS in 2016, we are reporting net federal ordinary and capital deferred tax liabilities ("DTLs") at December 31, 2016 and consequently no valuation allowance is recorded against any federal DTA. This is compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, where we reported net federal ordinary and capital DTAs, for which we recorded a full valuation allowance. Consistent with prior periods, at December 31, 2016, we continued to maintain a valuation allowance against our net state DTAs as we remain uncertain about our ability to generate sufficient income in future periods needed to utilize net state DTAs beyond the reversal of our state DTLs.
Our estimate of net deferred tax assets could change in future periods to the extent that actual or revised estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward periods change from current expectations. We assessed our tax positions for all open tax years (i.e., Federal, 2013 to 2016, and State, 2012 to 2016) and, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, concluded that we had no uncertain tax positions that resulted in material unrecognized tax benefits.
The following table summarizes the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014.
Table 21.2 – Provision for Income Taxes
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
Current Provision for Income Taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
$
1,477

 
$
144

 
$
24

State
 
331

 
167

 
17

Total Current Provision for Income Taxes
 
1,808

 
311

 
41

Deferred Provision for Income Taxes
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
1,910

 
(10,198
)
 
703

State
 
(10
)
 
(459
)
 

Total Deferred Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
 
1,900

 
(10,657
)
 
703

Total Provision for Income Taxes
 
$
3,708

 
$
(10,346
)
 
$
744


At December 31, 2016, our federal NOL carryforward at the REIT was $59 million, which will expire in 2029. In order to utilize NOLs at the REIT, taxable income must exceed dividend distributions. At December 31, 2016, our taxable REIT subsidiaries had federal NOLs of $28 million, which will expire in 2035. Redwood and its taxable subsidiaries accumulated an estimated state NOL of $1.25 billion at December 31, 2016. These NOLs expire beginning in 2029. If certain substantial changes in the Company’s ownership occur, there could be an annual limitation on the amount of the carryforwards that can be utilized.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, we recognized a provision for income taxes of $4 million, a benefit from income taxes of $10 million, and a provision for income taxes of $1 million, respectively. The following is a reconciliation of the statutory federal and state tax rates to our effective tax rate at December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014.
Table 21.3 – Reconciliation of Statutory Tax Rate to Effective Tax Rate
 
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
Federal statutory rate
 
34.0
 %
 
34.0
 %
 
34.0
 %
State statutory rate, net of Federal tax effect
 
7.2
 %
 
7.2
 %
 
7.2
 %
Differences in taxable (loss) income from GAAP income
 
(1.0
)%
 
(20.3
)%
 
(14.5
)%
Change in valuation allowance
 
(11.2
)%
 
6.1
 %
 
(0.1
)%
Dividends paid deduction
 
(26.3
)%
 
(38.3
)%
 
(25.9
)%
Effective Tax Rate
 
2.7
 %
 
(11.3
)%
 
0.7
 %

We believe that we have met all requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Many requirements for qualification as a REIT are complex and require analysis of particular facts and circumstances. Often there is only limited judicial or administrative interpretive guidance and as such there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service or courts would agree with our various tax positions. If we did not meet the requirements for statutory relief, we could be subject to a 100% prohibited transaction tax for certain transactions, be required to distribute additional dividends, or be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. We could also potentially lose our REIT status. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements.