XML 71 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Fair value measurements are utilized to determine the value of certain liabilities, to perform impairment assessments, and for disclosure purposes.  In February 2012 the Company issued financial instruments with features that were determined to be derivative liabilities, and as a result must be measured at fair value on a recurring basis under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall.  In addition we apply the fair value provisions of ASC 820-10-35 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall – Subsequent Measurement, for our nonfinancial assets which include our held for sale hotels, and the disclosure of the fair value of our debt.

 

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

 

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, as well as inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

 

Level 3 nonfinancial asset valuations use unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  We develop these inputs based on the best information available, including our own data. Financial asset and liability valuation inputs include unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the liability; this includes pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

 

Nonfinancial assets

 

Nonfinancial asset fair value measurements are discussed below in the note “Impairment Losses.”

 

Financial instruments

 

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the fair value of the derivative liabilities in connection with the February 2012 issuance was determined by the Monte Carlo simulation method.  The Monte Carlo simulation method is a generally accepted statistical method used to generate a defined number of stock price paths in order to develop a reasonable estimate of the range of future expected stock prices of the Company and its peer group and minimizes standard error.

 

The fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Series C preferred embedded derivative

 

 

10,921 

 

$

 

$

 

$

10,921 

Warrant derivative

 

 

4,593 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,593 

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

 

$

15,514 

 

$

 

$

 

$

15,514 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Series C preferred embedded derivative

 

$

13,804 

 

$

 

$

 

$

13,804 

Warrant derivative

 

 

6,533 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,533 

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

 

 

20,337 

 

$

 

$

 

$

20,337 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There were no transfers between levels during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the table above that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), and the realized and unrealized (gains) losses recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in Derivative gain  (loss)  during that period (in thousands): 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ending

 

 

Three Months Ending

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

 

Series C

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible

 

 

 

 

 

Series C

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible

 

 

 

 

 

 

preferred

 

 

 

 

 

loan

 

 

 

 

 

preferred

 

 

 

 

 

loan

 

 

 

 

 

 

embedded

 

 

Warrant

 

 

embedded

 

 

 

 

 

embedded

 

 

Warrant

 

 

embedded

 

 

 

 

 

 

derivative

 

 

derivative

 

 

derivative

 

 

Total

 

 

derivative

 

 

derivative

 

 

derivative

 

 

Total

Fair value, beginning of period

 

$

13,804 

 

$

6,533 

 

$

 

$

20,337 

 

$

3,761 

 

$

2,146 

 

$

 

$

5,907 

Net unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives

 

 

(2,883)

 

 

(1,940)

 

 

 

 

(4,823)

 

 

(1,210)

 

 

(905)

 

 

 

 

(2,115)

Purchases and issuances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

151 

 

 

151 

Sales and settlements, included in derivative gain (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross transfers in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross transfers out

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value, end of period

 

$

10,921 

 

$

4,593 

 

$

 

$

15,514 

 

$

2,551 

 

$

1,241 

 

$

151 

 

$

3,943 

Changes in realized (gains) losses, included in income on instruments held at end of period

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

Changes in unrealized (gains) losses, included in income on instruments held at end of period

 

$

(2,883)

 

$

(1,940)

 

$

 

$

(4,823)

 

$

(1,210)

 

$

(905)

 

$

 

$

(2,115)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates or credit spreads consistent with the maturity of the debt obligation with similar credit policies. Credit spreads take into consideration general market conditions and maturity. The inputs utilized in estimating the fair value of debt are classified in Level 2 of the hierarchy. The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s debt as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are presented in the table below (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying Value

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

 

March 31,

 

December 31,

 

March 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Held for use

 

$

64,532 

 

$

65,977 

 

$

64,089 

 

$

65,962 

Held for sale

 

 

21,162 

 

 

26,710 

 

 

21,354 

 

 

26,376 

Total

 

$

85,694 

 

$

92,687 

 

$

85,443 

 

$

92,338