N-CSRS 1 a11-15400_5ncsrs.htm N-CSRS

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

 

Investment Company Act file number

811-08748

 

Wanger Advisors Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts

 

02110

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip code)

 

Scott R. Plummer

5228 Ameriprise Financial Center

Minneapolis, MN 55474

(Name and address of agent for service)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

1-612-671-1947

 

 

Date of fiscal year end:

December 31

 

 

Date of reporting period:

June 30, 2011

 

 

Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

 

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 



 

Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.

 



Wanger International Select

2011 Semiannual Report

Not FDIC insuredNo bank guaranteeMay lose value




  Wanger International Select

  2011 Semiannual Report

    Table of Contents

2   Understanding Your Expenses  
3   Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook  
6   Performance Review  
8   Statement of Investments  
13   Statement of Assets and Liabilities  
13   Statement of Operations  
14   Statement of Changes in Net Assets  
15   Financial Highlights  
16   Notes to Financial Statements  
19   Management Fee Evaluation of the Senior Officer  
23   Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement  

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (CWAM) is one of the leading global small- and mid-cap equity managers in the United States with 40 years of small- and mid-cap investment experience. As of June 30, 2011, CWAM managed $35.8 billion in assets, and is the investment adviser to Wanger USA, Wanger International, Wanger Select and Wanger International Select (together, the Columbia Wanger Funds) and the Columbia Acorn Family of Funds.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a mutual fund carefully before investing. For a free prospectus, which contains this and other important information about the Fund, contact your financial adviser or insurance company or contact 1-888-4-WANGER. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.

An important note: Columbia Wanger Funds are available for purchase through variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies offered by the separate accounts of participating insurance companies and qualified pension or retirement plans.

The views expressed in "Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook" and in the Performance Review reflect the current views of the respective authors. These views are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict so actual outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. These views are subject to change at any time based upon economic, market or other conditions and the respective parties disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Columbia Wanger Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any particular Columbia Wanger Fund. References to specific company securities should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice.




Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Understanding Your Expenses

As a Fund shareholder, you incur three types of costs. There are transaction costs, which generally include sales charges on purchases and may include redemption or exchange fees. There are also ongoing costs, which generally include investment advisory fees and other Fund expenses. Lastly, there may be additional fees or charges imposed by the insurance company that sponsors your variable annuity product. The information on this page is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

Analyzing your Fund's expenses

To illustrate these ongoing costs, we have provided an example and calculated the expenses paid by investors in the Fund during the period. The information in the following table is based on an initial, hypothetical investment of $1,000, which is invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period. Expense information is calculated two ways and each method provides you with different results. The amount listed in the "Actual" column is calculated using actual operating expenses and total return for the Fund. The amount listed in the "Hypothetical" column assumes that the return each year is 5% before expenses and then applies the Fund's actual expense ratio for the period to the hypothetical return. You should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate either your actual account balance at the end of the period or the expenses you paid during the period. See "Compare with other funds" for details on using the hypothetical data.

Estimating your actual expenses

To estimate the expenses that you actually paid over the period, first you will need your account balance at the end of the period.

1.  Divide your ending account balance by $1,000. For example, if an account balance was $8,600 at the end of the period, the result would be 8.6.

2.  In the section of the table below titled "Expenses paid during the period," you will find a dollar amount in the column labeled "Actual." Multiply this amount by the result from step 1. Your answer is an estimate of the expenses you paid on your account during the period.

January 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011

    Account value at the
beginning of the period ($)
  Account value at the
end of the period ($)
  Expenses paid during
the period ($)
  Fund's annualized
expense ratio (%)*
 
    Actual   Hypothetical   Actual   Hypothetical   Actual   Hypothetical   Actual  
Wanger International Select     1,000.00       1,000.00       1,034.00       1,018.00       6.91       6.85       1.37    

 

*Expenses paid during the period are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, then multiplied by the number of days in the Fund's most recent fiscal half-year and divided by 365.

It is important to note that the expense amounts shown in the table are meant to highlight only ongoing costs of investing in the Fund. Expenses paid during the period do not include any insurance charges imposed by your insurance company's separate account. The hypothetical example provided is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds whose shareholders may incur transaction costs.

Compare with other funds

Since all mutual funds are required to include the same hypothetical calculations about expenses in shareholder reports, you can use this information to compare the ongoing cost of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare the 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples of other funds. As you compare hypothetical examples of other funds, it is important to note that hypothetical examples are meant to highlight the ongoing cost of investing in a fund and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges, redemption fees or exchange fees that may be incurred by shareholders of other funds. Expenses paid during the period do not include any insurance charges imposed by your insurance company's separate accounts.


2



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook

Just five to seven years ago, it was widely believed that North American natural gas resources were being rapidly depleted. Today, the outlook appears to be very much improved thanks to the ingenuity of a few individuals and a process that should provide natural gas for decades to come.

In 1825, some 34 years before Colonel Edwin Drake1 drilled the first oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania, William Aaron Hart drilled the first natural gas well, in shale located in Fredonia, New York. By August of that year, five structures in the village were illuminated by natural gas and by November there were 36 gas lights in the village. In 1857, Preston Barmore, the superintendent of the Fredonia Natural Gas Co., was not satisfied with the production from a 122 foot well so he exploded crevices of rock in the well, increasing the supply of gas. Within a few years, the village had 150 gas lights.2

Plenty of natural gas was subsequently found in sandstone formations under impermeable rock, in similar formations as oil, or accompanied by oil. Extracting this natural gas was less costly than drilling for gas in shale, so shale exploration all but ended. Millions of miles of gas pipelines were built, and demand for natural gas grew.3 U.S.-marketed production rose to 1 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of natural gas by 1923, and has ranged from 16.9 to 22.6 TCF since 1973.4 Natural gas is used for heating and manufacturing, and is a feedstock for fertilizers, plastics and chemicals.

Recent Natural Gas Shortages

In 2004, Julian Darley wrote High Noon for Natural Gas, The New Energy Crisis. He reviewed Hubbert's Peak, a theory named after the geologist who researched oil finding and production curves and then correctly predicted that U.S. oil production would peak around 1970. Darley applied Hubbert's Peak to natural gas data and concluded that North American gas production had also peaked and was likely to plunge.

Darley wrote, "The United States and Canada are entering a natural gas crisis ...North American supply is simply no longer able to meet desired consumption."5 He added, "...the worst immediate problem confronting the United States (and Canada) is not oil, but natural gas. It is a natural gas shortage that could seriously interrupt the U.S. economy..."6 Darley noted that the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) made enormous upward revisions for production of natural gas from shale, tight sands and coal beds, but he believed such gains would fail to occur. Instead, importing of liquefied natural gas (LNG) would have to be an interim solution. But LNG, Darley stated, had safety and security risks. Geopolitically, relying on imported LNG would also be problematic, as Russia and Iran had the largest reserves of natural gas.

Darley believed that the 300-plus new natural gas-fired electric generating stations, built between 1980 and 2003 at a cost of $100 billion, were huge mistakes. The power companies had apparently reviewed a 1999 National Petroleum Council report that stated North American natural gas supplies would grow. Darley labeled that report as an "example of the kind of cornucopian delusion that characterizes many in government and most in industry, who believe in nothing but economics and the miracle of capitalism with its unlimited ability to find substitutes for everything."7

Darley thought that with worldwide Peak Oil imminent and North American natural gas production plunging, energy was to become scarce, and the industrial revolution would unwind. He advocated that people should be able to obtain their daily needs within walking distance from where they lived. His long-term solution was to depopulate the earth, such that mankind no longer mined the planet and consumed only the energy that the sun regularly provides. At one child per woman, the population of the earth would be back to one billion in about one hundred years.

Domestic natural gas production fell between 2001 and 2005 and prices increased between 2002 and 2008.8 Most major oil companies and analysts agreed that natural gas production in North America was peaking, and that the U.S. would need substantial imports of LNG. I remember going to an energy conference in early 2006 where this view was widespread. Darley's nightmare scenario seemed to be coming true.

Back in the Gas Fields

George Mitchell has been called the Father of the Barnett Natural Gas Field, located in and around Fort Worth, Texas. Over an 18-year period beginning in 1981, his company, Mitchell Energy and Development, experimented with fracturing gas-bearing shale that is located between 6,000 and 14,000 feet below the surface. Geologists knew that shale had lots of pores and the ability to store natural gas, but since pores in shale are rarely interconnected, gas flows poorly through shale. Initial attempts to extract this gas were costly, and production was not economical. Eventually, the company developed a "light sand frac" method that was effective and used less fluid. The combination of reduced costs and rising natural gas prices made such drilling profitable. Mitchell drilled many wells at the Barnett field, producing far more natural gas than most people expected.9

Mitchell needed more funding and sold his company to Devon Energy, a larger, independent producer. Devon had expertise in an additional technology, horizontal drilling, which tilted drill holes at angles or sideways once they hit pay dirt. More gas-bearing shale was consequently exposed to the well. With this added technology, the company drilled 55 wells in the Barnett field in 2003 and the shale gas boom began.10 Some 13,500 gas wells have been drilled in the Barnett field since 199711 and the Barnett field accounted for 6% of total natural gas production in the United States in 2010.12

Drilling at other shale gas formations has also jumped. U.S. shale gas production increased


3



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

12-fold in the last decade and currently accounts for about 25% of U.S. natural gas production.13 With greater production, natural gas wellhead prices halved from 2008 to 2010. In its yearly forecast in 2010, the EIA doubled its estimate of U.S. shale gas production for 2035 and predicts shale gas production will hit 46% of U.S. consumption that year.14 Imports will drop from 11% of natural gas consumption in 2009 to 1%.15 With "economics and the miracle of capitalism"16 we won't need to revert to Darley's dark ages any time soon. The EIA also believes shale gas totaling at least six-times U.S. reserves is recoverable in at least 32 other countries.17

Energy Mix

In 2009, Robert Hefner published The Grand Energy Transition. The book provides perspectives on past and future sources and uses of energy. Hefner believes that energy usage naturally transitions from solids (wood and coal) to liquids (oil) and then to gasses (natural gas, wind and hopefully nuclear fusion). He sees newer fuels as superior to older ones, with each new fuel facilitating new technologies, improvements in the environment and higher living standards.

The transition to coal from wood powered the industrial revolution and allowed millions of acres of forests to regrow. Coal then fell from 80% of the world energy market in 1900 to about 28% currently. Oil ascended to 48% of the world's energy by 1973, displacing much dirty coal and revolutionizing transportation via the introduction of automobiles and airplanes. Oil subsequently dropped to about 36% of world energy consumption. Natural gas has risen from 10% of the world's energy in 1950 to 24% currently.18

Believing in global warming, Hefner notes that the transition from wood to coal to oil to natural gas slashed carbon content and increased hydrogen content of fuels with each transition. Since burning carbon creates carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary greenhouse gas, and burning hydrogen creates water, the natural transitions from solids to liquids to gasses slow global warming. Burning natural gas creates 44% less CO2 than burning coal and 29% less than burning oil. Burning natural gas also emits about 80% less nitrogen oxides, over 90% lower particulates and over 99% less sulfur dioxide than coal or oil.19

Under an earlier belief that the U.S. was running out of natural gas, the Natural Gas Policy Act (NPGA) and the Fuel Use Act were passed in 1978. The NGPA immediately deregulated prices for gas produced from deep wells and phased out other price controls.20 The Fuel Use Act mandated the phase out of natural gas for electric generation and restricted its industrial uses. Prices for deep gas jumped, but so did drilling. Production grew, and with demand depressed by the Fuel Use Act, prices then collapsed. There was an excess supply of natural gas, known as the "gas bubble," until the year 2000.

Hefner believes the 1978 laws slowed the natural transition from coal and oil to natural gas. As a result of the Fuel Use Act, some 100,000 megawatts of coal-fired electric generating capacity was built in the United States through 1989 that has emitted 15 billion metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.21 Hefner believes that the construction of the coal burning plants, not the natural gas burning plants, was the big mistake.

Hefner subscribes to Peak Oil occurring soon, but sees many decades of abundant and relatively cheap natural gas. Hence, he predicts the grand energy transition to natural gas will continue, and he believes natural gas will be a bridge fuel to renewable energy and possibly nuclear fusion. Natural gas complements wind energy quite well, as gas-burning electric plants can quickly power up when the wind slows.

Some 12 million vehicles worldwide are powered by natural gas. Of that number, there are estimated to be 110,000 natural gas-powered vehicles in the United States,22 including thousands of trucks serving the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles,23 more than 11,000 buses24 and approximately 12,000 Honda Civic GX cars.25 These vehicles burn natural gas currently priced at one-third of the energy equivalent price of oil. Hefner believes that half the autos in the United States should be powered by natural gas, and the dirtiest, coal-burning electric plants should be replaced by natural gas plants. Yearly gas consumption would rise by 13 TCF, but could be met by increased shale gas production.26

Investment Implications

We believe that innovations in producing gas from shale have indeed transformed the U.S. energy outlook. We profitably invested in some of the pioneers of shale gas though, with the current glut of natural gas, the stocks now look less attractive. Supplies of gas may remain high in the short term as some unprofitable drilling persists in order to keep lease rights. Over time, the low prices will likely result in reduced drilling and more constrained supplies. When this happens, natural gas prices should rise to a level where drilling and production are moderately profitable. We continue to look for suppliers and service companies participating in shale gas production. Some shale oil fields are now being developed, including the Bakken field in North Dakota and Canada and the Eagle Ford field in Texas. At this point, we don't think there will be enough shale oil production to revolutionize the oil market, but we do believe we have found some attractive stocks participating in those developments.

Charles P. McQuaid
President and Chief Investment Officer
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC


4



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

The information and data provided in this analysis are derived from sources that we deem to be reliable and accurate. These views are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict so actual outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. The views/opinions expressed in this essay are those of the author and not of the Columbia Wanger Funds Board, are subject to change at any time based upon economic, market or other conditions, may differ from views expressed by other Columbia Management associates and the respective parties disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Columbia Wanger Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any particular Columbia Wanger Fund.

1  Colonel Edwin Drake was an American oil driller, credited with being the first to drill for oil in the United States.

2  Lash, Eileen and Gary, "The Early History of Natural Gas, Kicking Down the Well," The SUNY Fredonia Shale Research Institute, June 3, 2011, http://www.fredonia.edu/shaleinstitute/history.asp.

3  U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/ngpipeline/index.html.

4  EIA data, including imports primarily from Canada, states the U.S. has been using about 23 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas a year, including about 6.6 TCF for industrial purposes. www.eia.gov.

5  Darley, Julian, High Noon for Natural Gas, The New Energy Crisis, (White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing Company 2004) p. 13.

6  Ibid., p. 2.

7  Ibid., p. 79-80.

8  According to EIA data, domestic natural gas production fell from 20.6 TCF in 2001 to 18.9 TCF in 2005. Average annual wellhead prices rose from $3 to $5 in 2002-2003 to $6 to $8 from 2006-2008. www.eia.gov.

9  Airhart, Marc, "The Father of the Barnett Natural Gas Field," http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-father.html.

10  Yergin, Daniel, "Stepping on the Gas," Wall Street Journal, April 2, 2011.

11  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

12  U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas, Development in the United States: A Primer," April 2009, p. ES-1, http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/naturalgas_general/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

13  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

14  Lomax, Simon, "Shale-Gas Output May Double by 2035, Reducing Energy Imports, U.S. Says," Bloomberg, December 16, 2010, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-16/natural-gas-production-from-shale-may-double-by-35-u-s-agency-forecasts.html.

15  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

16  Darley, Julian, op. cit., p. 79-80.

17  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

18  Hefner III, Robert A., "The Grand Energy Transition," (Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2009) p. 27.

19  U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas, Development in the United States: A Primer," April 2009, p. 5, http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/naturalgas_general/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

20  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 120-121. Having been an independent explorer for natural gas, Hefner was well aware that gas existed in locations independently of oil. (He has been called the "Father of Deep Natural Gas" as his company drilled very deep wells finding only natural gas at very high pressure.) In the 1970s when geologists for major oil companies testified to Congress that the U.S. was running out of natural gas, Hefner dissented, believing that the shortage was caused by price controls in place since 1954. Price controls cause shortages of valuable commodities by boosting demand and restraining supplies.

21  Ibid., p. 122.

22  Natural Gas Vehicles of America, http://www.ngvc.org/mktplace/index.html. Accessed July 20, 2011.

23  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 201.

24  Natural Gas Vehicles of America, http://www.ngvc.org/mktplace/index.html. Accessed July 20, 2011.

25  Oberman, Mira, "The Greenest Car You've (Likely) Never Heard Of," Agence France-Presse, April 11, 2011.

26  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 203.


5



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Performance Review Wanger International Select

Christopher J. Olson
Portfolio Manager

Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Please visit columbiamanagement.com for performance updates for the most recent month-end.

Wanger International Select gained 3.40% during the semiannual period ended June 30, 2011, underperforming the 4.04% gain of its primary benchmark, the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Between $2B and $10B Index.

The Tohoku earthquake that hit Japan in March 2011 was devastating and Japanese equities quickly fell following the disaster. The economic situation in Japan began to stabilize in the second half of the period, however, and two of the Fund's Japanese names ranked among the top contributors for the period. Gree, a mobile social networking game developer, was up 78% for the half year as the company benefited from new product rollouts. Asahi Diamond Industrial, a manufacturer of consumable diamond tools, was up 16% as revenues remained strong and its operations were largely unaffected by the earthquake.

Elsewhere, German online payment processor and risk manager Wirecard was up 31%. The company is growing revenues at a 20% clip on the back of ongoing growth of e-commerce, as well as the introduction of a popular prepaid cash card. Swedish measurement equipment manufacturer Hexagon continued its strong run, gaining 16% during the period. The company benefited from continued revenue growth driven mainly by its exposure to emerging markets. Chemring, a UK manufacturer of defense countermeasures and energetics, enjoyed strong revenue growth, gaining 15% for half year. Irish pharmaceutical company United Drug rose 21% as investors realized earnings had improved and the stock was very cheap. Workspace Group, a UK real estate company, was up 29% for the half year, benefiting from improving occupancy rates.

Energy stocks struggled during the half year period. Pacific Rubiales Energy, a Colombian oil production and exploration company, was off 21% for the six-month period on disappointing results from recent explorations. After many quarters of strong performance, Dutch sub-sea oilfield services provider Fugro fell 11% for the period. The company reported disappointing earnings, stating that many of its customers opted to delay expected projects. Quetzal Energy, an oil and gas exploration company operating in Latin America, was down 37% year to date as a delay in receiving environmental approvals slowed down its drilling program.

Outside the energy sector, Petropavlovsk, a UK-listed company operating gold and iron ore mines in Russia, was off 24% for the six months. Delays and capital concerns, combined with weakness in gold mining stocks in general, hurt returns. We sold the Fund's position in the stock. Jiangsu Expressway, a Chinese toll road operator, fell 15% for the half after the government began to crack down on toll operators that were overcharging. Jiangsu Expressway has kept its charges in line with stated policy but was down nonetheless, as the entire sector was sold off.

International investing involves special risks, including foreign taxation, currency risks, risks associated with possible differences in financial standards and other risks associated with future political and economic developments. Stocks of small- and mid-cap companies pose special risks, including possible illiquidity and greater price volatility than stocks of larger, more established companies. Investing in emerging markets may involve greater risks than investing in more developed countries.

Portfolio holdings are subject to change periodically and may not be representative of current holdings.

Fund's Positions in Mentioned Holdings

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

Chemring     3.7 %  
Hexagon     3.7    
Wirecard     2.8    
Asahi Diamond Industrial     2.4    
United Drug     1.9    
Fugro     1.7    
Pacific Rubiales Energy     1.5    
Jiangsu Expressway     1.4    
Gree     1.4    
Workspace Group     1.1    
Quetzal Energy     0.3    


6



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Growth of a $10,000 Investment in Wanger International Select
February 1, 1999 (inception date) through June 30, 2011

Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Performance results reflect any fee waivers or reimbursements of Fund expenses by the investment adviser and/or any of its affiliates. Absent these fee waivers and/or expense reimbursement arrangements, performance results would have been lower. For daily and most recent month-end performance updates, please call 1-888-4-WANGER.

This graph compares the results of $10,000 invested in Wanger International Select on February 1, 1999 (the date the Fund began operations) through June 30, 2011, to the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Between $2B and $10B Index, with dividends and capital gains reinvested. Although the index is provided for use in assessing the Fund's performance, the Fund's holdings may differ significantly from those in the index.

Top 10 Holdings

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

1. Ascendas REIT (Singapore)
Industrial Property Landlord
  5.0
 
%  
2. Kansai Paint (Japan)
Paint Producer in Japan, India, China & Southeast Asia
  4.4
 
 
3. Chemring (United Kingdom)
Defense Manufacturer of Countermeasures & Energetics
  3.7
 
 
4. Hexagon (Sweden)
Measurement Equipment & Software
  3.7
 
 
5. NHN (South Korea)
South Korea's Largest Online Search Engine
  3.3
 
 
6. Mapletree Industrial Trust (Singapore)
Industrial Property Landlord
  3.2
 
 
7. Intertek Group (United Kingdom)
Testing, Inspection & Certification Services
  2.9
 
 
8. Wirecard (Germany)
Online Payment Processing & Risk Management
  2.8
 
 
9. AkzoNobel (Netherlands)
Largest Global Supplier of Protective Paints & Coatings
  2.5
 
 
10. Asahi Diamond Industrial (Japan)
Consumable Diamond Tools
  2.4
 
 

Top 5 Countries

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

United Kingdom     13.8 %  
Japan     13.3    
Netherlands     8.7    
Singapore     8.1    
Germany     6.7    

 

Results as of June 30, 2011

    2nd quarter   Year to date   1 year   5 years   10 years  
Wanger International
Select
    1.01 %     3.40 %     31.69 %     6.66 %     8.98 %  
S&P Developed Ex-U.S.
Between $2B and $10B
Index*
    0.90       4.04       33.74       3.73       9.60    
MSCI EAFE Index (Net)     1.56       4.98       30.36       1.48       5.66    
Lipper International
Growth Funds Variable
Underlying Index
    1.49       3.89       31.22       3.01       4.89    

 

*The Fund's primary benchmark.

NAV as of 6/30/11: $19.06

Performance numbers reflect all Fund expenses but do not include any fees and expenses imposed under your variable annuity or life insurance policy or qualified pension or retirement plan. If performance included the effect of these additional charges, it would be lower.

The Fund's annual operating expense ratio is 1.38%. The annual operating expense ratio is as stated in the Fund's prospectus that is current as of the date of this report. Differences in expense ratios disclosed elsewhere in this report may result from including fee waivers and reimbursements as well as different time periods used in calculating the ratios.

All results shown assume reinvestment of distributions and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the sale of Fund shares.

The S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Between $2B and $10B Index is a subset of the broad market selected by the index sponsor representing the mid-cap developed market, excluding the United States. The Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, Far East (MSCI EAFE) Index (Net) is a capitalization-weighted index that tracks the total return of common stocks in 22 developed-market countries within Europe, Australasia and the Far East. The returns of the MSCI EAFE Index (Net) are presented net of taxes. The Lipper International Growth Funds Variable Underlying Index is an equally weighted representation of the 30 largest variable insurance underlying funds in the Lipper International Growth Funds Variable Underlying Classification. Indexes are not managed and do not incur fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Lipper Inc., a widely respected data provider in the industry, calculates an average total return (assuming reinvestment of distributions) for mutual funds with investment objectives similar to those of the Fund. Lipper makes no adjustment for the effect of sales loads.

Portfolio characteristics and holdings are subject to change periodically and may not be representative of current characteristics and holdings.


7




Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Equities – 86.7%  
    Europe – 41.4%  
    United Kingdom – 13.8%  
  109,838     Chemring
Defense Manufacturer of Countermeasures & Energetics
  $ 1,128,221    
  28,000     Intertek Group
Testing, Inspection & Certification Services
    886,639    
  61,600     JLT Group
International Business Insurance Broker
    673,271    
  68,600     Serco
Facilities Management
    608,301    
  672,000     Workspace Group
United Kingdom Real Estate
    326,254    
  309,800     Archipelago Resources (a)
Gold Mining Projects in Indonesia, Vietnam & the Philippines
    307,030    
  43,000     Cobham
Aerospace Components
    146,031    
  15,900     Shaftesbury
London Prime Retail REIT
    134,739    
      4,210,486    
    Netherlands – 8.7%  
  12,000     AkzoNobel
Largest Global Supplier of Protective Paints & Coatings
    756,978    
  17,864     Imtech
Electromechanical & Information & Communications
Technologies Installation & Maintenance
    631,834    
  7,291     Fugro
Sub-sea Oilfield Services
    525,692    
  17,293     Aalberts Industries
Flow Control & Heat Treatment
    404,248    
  3,000     Core Laboratories
Oil & Gas Reservoir Consulting
    334,620    
      2,653,372    
    Germany – 6.7%  
  47,000     Wirecard
Online Payment Processing & Risk Management
    840,036    
  8,000     Rheinmetall
Defense & Automotive
    708,253    
  20,900     Rhoen-Klinikum
Health Care Services
    504,327    
      2,052,616    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Sweden – 3.7%  
  45,733     Hexagon
Measurement Equipment & Software
  $ 1,126,478    
    Switzerland – 3.1%  
  3,800     Kuehne & Nagel
Freight Forwarding/Logistics
    576,723    
  2,000     Partners Group
Private Markets Asset Management
    353,970    
      930,693    
    Ireland – 1.9%  
  165,400     United Drug
Irish Pharmaceutical Wholesaler & Outsourcer
    566,537    
    Iceland – 1.1%  
  330,000     Marel (a)
Largest Manufacturer of Poultry &
Fish Processing Equipment
    349,328    
    Denmark – 1.1%  
  2,000     Novozymes
Industrial Enzymes
    325,466    
    France- 0.8%  
  3,000     Neopost
Postage Meter Machines
    257,721    
    Belgium – 0.5%  
  2,100     EVS Broadcast Equipment
Digital Live Mobile Production Software & Systems
    142,155    
        Total Europe     12,614,852    
    Asia – 28.9%  
    Japan – 13.3%  
  146,000     Kansai Paint
Paint Producer in Japan, India, China & Southeast Asia
    1,330,234    
  33,000     Asahi Diamond Industrial
Consumable Diamond Tools
    721,468    
  600     Jupiter Telecommunications
Largest Cable Service Provider in Japan
    671,265    
  302     Seven Bank
ATM Processing Services
    603,477    
  19,000     Gree (a)
Mobile Social Networking Game Developer/Platform
    415,354    
  7,360     Ain Pharmaciez
Dispensing Pharmacy/Drugstore Operator
    302,828    
      4,044,626    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
8



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Singapore – 8.1%  
  910,000     Ascendas REIT
Industrial Property Landlord
  $ 1,513,560    
  1,011,900     Mapletree Industrial Trust
Industrial Property Landlord
    964,892    
      2,478,452    
    South Korea – 4.5%  
  5,623     NHN (a)
South Korea's Largest Online Search Engine
    996,884    
  10,500     Woongjin Coway
South Korean Household Appliance Rental Service Provider
    374,477    
      1,371,361    
    China – 3.0%  
  466,000     Jiangsu Expressway
Chinese Toll Road Operator
    427,194    
  183,000     Zhaojin Mining Industry
Gold Mining & Refining in China
    377,522    
  115,100     Want Want
Chinese Branded Consumer Food Company
    111,757    
      916,473    
        Total Asia     8,810,912    
    Other Countries – 14.1%  
    South Africa – 5.9%  
  81,000     Adcock Ingram Holdings
Manufacturer of Pharmaceuticals & Medical Supplies
    711,676    
  341,700     Rand Merchant Insurance
Directly Sold Property & Casualty Insurance;
Holdings in Other Insurers
    624,094    
  8,300     Naspers
Media in Africa, China, Russia & Other Emerging Markets
    468,837    
      1,804,607    
    Canada – 3.0%  
  14,800     CCL Industries
Leading Global Label Manufacturer
    508,858    
  8,700     AG Growth
Leading Manufacturer of Augers & Grain Handling Equipment
    413,147    
      922,005    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    United States – 2.1%  
  4,600     SM Energy
Oil & Gas Producer
  $ 338,008    
  7,125     Atwood Oceanics (a)
Offshore Drilling Contractor
    314,426    
      652,434    
    Australia – 1.9%  
  38,000     UGL
Engineering & Facilities Management
    567,889    
    Israel – 1.2%  
  22,000     Israel Chemicals
Producer of Potash, Phosphates, Bromine &
Specialty Chemicals
    351,078    
        Total Other Countries     4,298,013    
    Latin America – 2.3%  
    Colombia – 1.8%  
  17,400     Pacific Rubiales Energy
Oil Production & Exploration in Colombia
    466,370    
  1,200,000     Quetzal Energy (a)(b)
Explores for Oil & Gas in Latin America
    95,557    
      561,927    
    Argentina – 0.5%  
  68,182     Union Agriculture Group (a)(b)
Farmland Operator in Uruguay
    150,000    
        Total Latin America     711,927    
Total Equities
(Cost: $19,540,337) – 86.7%
    26,435,704    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
9



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Principal Amount       Value  
Short-Term Obligation – 14.1%  
    Repurchase Agreement – 14.1%  
$ 4,303,000     Repurchase Agreement with Fixed
Income Clearing Corp., dated 6/30/11,
due 7/01/11 at 0.01%, collateralized
by a U.S. Government Agency obligation
maturing 8/18/17, market value
$4,391,033 (repurchase proceeds
$4,303,001)
  $ 4,303,000    
Total Short-Term Obligation
(Cost: $4,303,000)
    4,303,000    
Total Investments
(Cost: $23,843,337) – 100.8% (c)(d)
    30,738,704    
Cash and Other Assets Less Liabilities – (0.8)%     (235,637 )  
Total Net Assets – 100.0%   $ 30,503,067    

 

Notes to Statement of Investments

(a)  Non-income producing security.

(b)  Denotes a restricted security, which is subject to restrictions on resale under federal securities laws. These securities are valued at a fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures by the Board of Trustees. At June 30, 2011, the market value of these securities amounted to $245,557 which represented 0.81% of total net assets.

Additional information on these securities is as follows:


Security
  Acquisition
Dates
  Shares   Cost   Value  
Union Agriculture
Group
  12/08/10     68,182     $ 150,000     $ 150,000    
Quetzal Energy   1/14/11     1,200,000       151,653       95,557    
            $ 301,653     $ 245,557    

 

(c)  On June 30, 2011, the Fund's total investments were denominated in currencies as follows:

Currency   Value   Percentage of
Net Assets
 
U.S. Dollar   $ 5,440,055       17.8    
Euro     5,337,781       17.5    
British Pound     4,210,486       13.8    
Japanese Yen     4,044,626       13.3    
Singapore Dollar     2,478,452       8.1    
South African Rand     1,804,607       5.9    
Other currencies less than
5% of total net assets
    7,422,697       24.4    
Cash and other assets
less liabilities
    (235,637 )     (0.8 )  
    $ 30,503,067       100.0    

 

(d)  At June 30, 2011, for federal income tax purposes, the cost of investments was $23,843,337 and net unrealized appreciation was $6,895,367 consisting of gross unrealized appreciation of $7,219,496 and gross unrealized depreciation of $324,129.

  Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments, following the input prioritization hierarchy established by GAAP. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

  Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

  Level 2—prices determined using other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others)

  Level 3—prices determined using significant unobservable inputs where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable or less reliable (including management's own assumptions about the factors market participants would use in pricing an investment)

  The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

  Examples of the types of securities in which the Fund would typically invest and how they are classified within this hierarchy are as follows. Typical Level 1 securities include exchange traded domestic equities, mutual funds whose NAVs are published each day and exchange traded foreign equities that are not statistically fair valued. Typical Level 2 securities include exchange traded foreign equities that are statistically fair valued, forward foreign currency exchange contracts and short-term investments valued at amortized cost. Additionally, securities fair valued by the Valuation Committee of the Fund's Board of Trustees that rely on significant observable inputs are also included in Level 2. Typical Level 3 securities include any security fair valued by the Valuation Committee that relies on significant unobservable inputs.

The following table summarizes the inputs used, as of June 30, 2011, in valuing the Fund's assets:





Investment Type
  Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Other
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total  
Equities  
Europe   $ 334,620     $ 12,280,232     $     $ 12,614,852    
Asia           8,810,912             8,810,912    
Other Countries     1,574,439       2,723,574             4,298,013    
Latin America     466,370       95,557       150,000       711,927    
Total Equities     2,375,429       23,910,275       150,000       26,435,704    
Total Short-Term Obligation           4,303,000             4,303,000    
Total Investments   $ 2,375,429     $ 28,213,275     $ 150,000     $ 30,738,704    

 

The Fund's assets assigned to the Level 2 input category are generally valued using a market approach, in which a security's value is determined through its correlation to prices and information from observable market transactions for similar or identical assets. Foreign equities are generally valued at the last sales price on the foreign exchange or market on which they trade. The Fund may use a systematic fair valuation model provided by an independent third party to value securities principally traded in foreign markets in order to adjust for possible stale pricing that may occur between the close of the foreign exchanges and the time for valuation. These models take into account available market data including intraday index, ADR, and ETF movements. Securities acquired via private placement that have a holding period or an extended settlement period are valued at a discount to the same shares that are trading freely on the market. These discounts are determined by the adviser's experience with

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
10



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

similar securities or situations. Factors may include, but are not limited to, trade volume, shares outstanding and stock price.

  Certain short-term obligations may be valued using amortized cost, an income approach which converts future cash flows to a present value based upon the discount or premium at purchase.

  The Fund's assets assigned to the Level 3 input category are valued at fair value as determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees. To determine fair value, management will utilize the valuation technique that they deem the most appropriate in the circumstances. Securities acquired via private placement but are not yet trading are valued using a market approach for which management has determined that the original transaction price is the best representation of fair value. The original cost may be adjusted for the market movement in an index, ETF or similar security during the period it does not trade.

  There were no significant transfers of financial assets between levels 1 and 2 during the period.

The following table reconciles asset balances for the six months ending June 30, 2011, in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining value:

Investments
in Securities
  Balance as of
December 31,
2010
  Realized
Gain/(Loss)
  Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
  Purchases   Sales   Transfers
into
Level 3
  Transfers
out of
Level 3
  Balance
as of
June 30,
2011
 
Equities
Latin America
  $ 150,000     $     $     $     $     $     $     $ 150,000    

 

  The information in the above reconciliation table represents fiscal year to date activity for any securities identified as using Level 3 inputs at either the beginning or the end of the current fiscal period.

  The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) attributed to securities owned at June 30, 2011, which were valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) amounted to $0. This amount is included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
11



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International Select

Portfolio Diversification June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

At June 30, 2011, the Fund's portfolio investments as a percentage of net assets was diversified as follows:

    Value   Percentage of
Net Assets
 
Industrial Goods & Services  
Industrial Materials & Specialty Chemicals   $ 2,763,756       9.1    
Other Industrial Services     2,663,085       8.7    
Machinery     2,449,918       8.0    
Electrical Components     1,274,253       4.2    
Outsourcing Services     608,301       2.0    
Conglomerates     404,248       1.3    
      10,163,561       33.3    
Information  
Internet Related     1,465,721       4.8    
Instrumentation     1,126,478       3.7    
Financial Processors     840,035       2.7    
CATV     671,265       2.2    
Gaming Equipment & Services     415,354       1.4    
Business Software     142,155       0.5    
      4,661,008       15.3    
Other Industries  
Real Estate     2,939,446       9.6    
Transportation     427,193       1.4    
      3,366,639       11.0    
Energy & Minerals  
Mining     1,019,172       3.3    
Oil & Gas Producers     899,935       2.9    
Oil Services     840,118       2.8    
Agricultural Commodities     150,000       0.5    
      2,909,225       9.5    

 

    Value   Percentage of
Net Assets
 
Finance  
Insurance   $ 1,297,364       4.2    
Banks     603,477       2.0    
Brokerage & Money Management     353,970       1.2    
      2,254,811       7.4    
Health Care  
Pharmaceuticals     1,278,213       4.2    
Health Care Services     504,327       1.7    
      1,782,540       5.9    
Consumer Goods & Services  
Nondurables     508,858       1.7    
Other Consumer Services     374,477       1.2    
Retail     302,828       1.0    
Food & Beverage     111,757       0.4    
      1,297,920       4.3    
Total Equities     26,435,704       86.7    
Short-Term Obligation     4,303,000       14.1    
Total Investments     30,738,704       100.8    
Cash and Other Assets
Less Liabilities
    (235,637 )     (0.8 )  
Net Assets   $ 30,503,067       100.0 %  

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
12




Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Statement of Assets and Liabilities
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Assets:  
Investments, at cost   $ 19,540,337    
Repurchase agreement, at cost     4,303,000    
Investments, at value   $ 26,435,704    
Repurchase agreement, at value     4,303,000    
Cash     152    
Foreign currency (cost of $36,408)     36,536    
Receivable for:  
Fund shares sold     15,993    
Securities lending income     577    
Dividends     24,626    
Foreign tax reclaims     9,227    
Other assets     136    
Total Assets     30,825,951    
Liabilities:  
Payable for:  
Investments purchased     195,377    
Fund shares repurchased     65,146    
Investment advisory fee     23,502    
Administration fee     1,250    
Transfer agent fee     6    
Trustees' fees     692    
Professional fees     11,088    
Custody fee     4,660    
Reports to shareholders     10,569    
Chief compliance officer expenses     7    
Trustees' deferred compensation plan     8,495    
Other liabilities     2,092    
Total Liabilities     322,884    
Net Assets   $ 30,503,067    
Composition of Net Assets:  
Paid-in capital   $ 26,548,703    
Overdistributed net investment income     (329,723 )  
Accumulated net realized loss     (2,611,961 )  
Net unrealized appreciation on:  
Investments     6,895,367    
Foreign currency translations     681    
Net Assets   $ 30,503,067    
Fund Shares Outstanding     1,599,984    
Net asset value, offering price and redemption
price per share
  $ 19.06    

Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Investment Income:  
Dividends (net foreign taxes withheld of $28,989)   $ 384,962    
Securities lending income, net     875    
Interest income     371    
Total Investment Income     386,208    
Expenses:  
Investment advisory fee     144,795    
Administration fee     7,702    
Transfer agent fee     83    
Trustees' fees     2,778    
Custody fee     23,230    
Professional fees     12,507    
Chief compliance officer expenses (See Note 4)     521    
Other expenses (See Note 5)     18,953    
Total Expenses     210,569    
Custody earnings credit     (7 )  
Net Expenses     210,562    
Net Investment Income     175,646    
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on
Investments and Foreign Currency:
 
Net realized gain (loss) on:  
Investments     2,739,674    
Foreign currency transactions     (3,736 )  
Net realized gain     2,735,938    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:  
Investments     (1,853,626 )  
Foreign currency translations     (226 )  
Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation)
    (1,853,852 )  
Net Gain     882,086    
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations   $ 1,057,732    

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
13



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2011
 
Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 
Operations:  
Net investment income   $ 175,646     $ 168,390    
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency transactions     2,735,938       3,637,871    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
on investments and foreign currency translations
    (1,853,852 )     2,083,489    
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations     1,057,732       5,889,750    
Distributions to Shareholders:  
From net investment income     (226,064 )     (385,292 )  
Share Transactions:  
Subscriptions     1,024,749       2,051,847    
Distributions reinvested     226,064       385,292    
Redemptions     (3,248,477 )     (7,726,656 )  
Net Decrease from Fund Share Transactions     (1,997,664 )     (5,289,517 )  
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets     (1,165,996 )     214,941    
Net Assets:  
Beginning of period     31,669,063       31,454,122    
End of period   $ 30,503,067     $ 31,669,063    
Overdistributed net investment income at end of period   $ (329,723 )   $ (279,305 )  

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
14




Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Financial Highlights

    (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Year Ended December 31,  
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007   2006  
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period   $ 18.57     $ 15.42     $ 12.01     $ 28.07     $ 26.62     $ 19.63    
Income from Investment Operations:  
Net investment income (a)     0.11       0.09       0.10       0.21       0.10       0.11    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
investments and foreign currency
    0.52       3.28       3.71       (10.31 )     4.92       6.94    
Total from Investment Operations     0.63       3.37       3.81       (10.10 )     5.02       7.05    
Less Distributions to Shareholders:  
From net investment income     (0.14 )     (0.22 )     (0.40 )     (0.09 )     (0.21 )     (0.06 )  
From net realized gains                       (5.87 )     (3.36 )        
Total Distributions to Shareholders     (0.14 )     (0.22 )     (0.40 )     (5.96 )     (3.57 )     (0.06 )  
Net Asset Value, End of Period   $ 19.06     $ 18.57     $ 15.42     $ 12.01     $ 28.07     $ 26.62    
Total Return (b)     3.40 %(c)     22.09 %     32.92 %(d)     (44.35 )%     21.78 %     36.00 %  
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data:  
Net expenses (e)     1.37 %(f)     1.38 %     1.45 %     1.24 %     1.18 %     1.19 %  
Net investment income (e)     1.14 %(f)     0.57 %     0.75 %     1.10 %     0.37 %     0.47 %  
Waiver/Reimbursement                 0.04 %                    
Portfolio turnover rate     20 %(c)     37 %     62 %     68 %     69 %     61 %  
Net assets, end of period (000s)   $ 30,503     $ 31,669     $ 31,454     $ 29,604     $ 73,485     $ 62,594    

 

(a)  Net investment income per share was based upon the average shares outstanding during the period.

(b)  Total return at net asset value assuming all distributions reinvested.

(c)  Not annualized.

(d)  Had the investment adviser not waived a portion of expenses, total return would have been reduced.

(e)  The benefits derived from custody fees paid indirectly had an impact of less than 0.01%.

(f)  Annualized.

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
15




Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.  Nature of Operations

Wanger International Select (the Fund), is a series of Wanger Advisors Trust (the Trust), an open-end management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. The investment objective of the Fund is to seek long-term capital appreciation. The Fund is available only for allocation to certain life insurance company separate accounts established for the purpose of funding qualified and non-qualified variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies and may also be offered directly to certain types of pension plans and retirement arrangements.

2.  Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Security valuation

Securities of the Fund are valued at market value or, if a market quotation for a security is not readily available or is deemed not to be reliable because of events or circumstances that have occurred between the market quotation and the time as of which the security is to be valued, the security is valued at its fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. A security traded on a securities exchange or in an over-the-counter market in which transaction prices are reported is valued at the last sales price at the time of valuation. A security traded principally on NASDAQ is valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds are valued at their closing net asset value as reported to NASDAQ. A security for which there is no reported sale on the valuation date is valued at the latest bid quotation. Short-term investments maturing in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. A security for which a market quotation is not readily available and any other assets are valued at their fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. The Trust has retained an independent statistical fair value pricing service that employs a systematic methodology to assist in the fair valuation process for securities principally traded in a foreign market in order to adjust for possible changes in value that may occur between the close of the foreign market and the time as of which the securities are to be valued. If a security is valued at a fair value, that value may be different from the last quoted market price for the security.

Repurchase agreements

The Fund may engage in repurchase agreement transactions. The Fund, through its custodian, receives delivery of underlying securities collateralizing each repurchase agreement. The counterparty is required to maintain collateral that is at all times at least equal to the repurchase price including interest. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, realization and/or retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings.

Foreign currency translations

Values of investments denominated in foreign currencies are converted into U.S. dollars using the New York spot market rate of exchange at the time of valuation. Purchases and sales of investments and dividend and interest income are translated into U.S. dollars using the spot market rate of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. The gain or loss resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates is included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss from investments, as appropriate.

Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed) and dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, except that certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as soon as the information is available to the Fund. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes amortization of discounts on debt obligations when required for federal income tax purposes. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

Awards, if any, from class action litigation related to securities owned may be recorded as a reduction of cost of those securities. If the applicable securities are no longer owned, the proceeds are recorded as realized gains.

Restricted securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Board of Trustees.

Securities lending

The Fund may lend securities up to one-third of the value of its total assets to certain approved brokers, dealers and other financial institutions to earn additional income. The Fund retains the benefits of owning the securities, including receipt of dividends or interest generated by the security. The Fund also receives a fee for the loan. The Fund has the ability to recall the loans at any time and could do so in order to vote proxies or to sell the loaned securities. Each loan is collateralized by cash that exceeded the value of the securities on loan. The market value of the loaned securities is determined daily at the close of business of the Fund and any additional required collateral is delivered to each Fund on the next business day. The Fund has elected to invest the cash collateral in the Dreyfus Government Cash Management Fund and the income earned is paid to the Fund, net of any fees remitted to Goldman Sachs Agency Lending as the lending agent and borrower rebates. The Fund's adviser, Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (CWAM), does not retain any fees earned by the lending program. Generally, in the event of borrower default, the Fund has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. In the event the Fund is delayed or prevented from exercising its right to dispose of the collateral, there may be a potential loss to the Fund. Some of these losses may be indemnified by the lending agent. The Fund bears the risk of loss with respect to the investment of collateral.

The net lending income earned by the Fund as of June 30, 2011, is included in the Statement of Operations. There were no loans outstanding on June 30, 2011.

Fund share valuation

Fund shares are sold and redeemed on a continuing basis at net asset value. Net asset value per share is determined daily as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) on each day the Exchange is open for trading by dividing the total value of the Fund's investments and other assets, less liabilities, by the number of Fund shares outstanding.

Custody fees/Credits

Custody fees are reduced based on the Fund's cash balances maintained with the custodian. The amount is disclosed as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.

Federal income taxes

The Fund has complied with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code available to regulated investment companies and, in the manner provided therein, distributes all its taxable income, as well as any net realized gain on sales of investments and foreign currency transactions reportable for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Fund paid no federal income taxes and no federal income tax provision was required.


16



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Expenses

General expenses of the Trust are allocated to the Fund and the other series of the Trust based upon relative net assets or other expense allocation methodologies determined by the nature of the expense. Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged to the Fund.

Foreign capital gains taxes

Gains in certain countries may be subject to foreign taxes at the fund level, at rates ranging from 10%-15%. The Fund accrues for such foreign taxes on net realized and unrealized gains at the appropriate rate for each jurisdiction.

Distributions to shareholders

Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.

Indemnification

In the normal course of business, the Trust on behalf of the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and that provide general indemnities. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims against the Fund. Also under the Trust's organizational documents, the trustees and officers of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities that may arise out of their duties to the Trust. However based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss due to these warranties and indemnities to be minimal.

3.  Federal Tax Information

The tax character of distributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows:

    December 31, 2010  
Distributions paid from:  
Ordinary Income*   $ 385,292    

 

* For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions, if any, are considered ordinary income distributions.

The following capital loss carryforwards, determined as of December 31, 2010, may be available to reduce taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code:

Year of
Expiration
  Capital Loss
Carryforwards
 
2017   $ 5,206,746    

 

Management is required to determine whether a tax position of the Fund is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized by the Fund is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Management is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. However, management's conclusions may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, new tax laws, regulations, and administrative interpretations (including relevant court decisions). The Fund's federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

4.  Transactions With Affiliates

CWAM is a wholly owned subsidiary of Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (Columbia Management), which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (Ameriprise Financial). CWAM furnishes continuing investment supervision to the Fund and is responsible for the overall management of the Fund's business affairs.

CWAM receives a monthly advisory fee based on the Fund's average daily net assets at the following annual rates:

Average Daily Net Assets   Annual Fee Rate  
Up to $500 million     0.94 %  
$500 million and over     0.89 %  

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the annualized effective investment advisory fee rate was 0.94% of the Fund's average daily net assets.

Through April 30, 2012, CWAM has contractually agreed to reimburse the Fund to the extent that ordinary operating expenses (exclusive of brokerage commissions, interest, taxes and extraordinary expenses, but inclusive of custodian charges relating to overdrafts, if any), after giving effect to any balance credits from the Fund's custodian, exceed an annual percentage of 1.45% of average daily net assets on an annualized basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Fund was not reimbursed any expenses.

CWAM provides administrative services and receives an administration fee from the Fund at the following annual rates:

Wanger Advisors Trust Aggregate
Average Daily Net Assets of the Trust
  Annual Fee Rate  
Up to $4 million     0.05 %  
$4 billion to $6 billion     0.04 %  
$6 billion to $8 billion     0.03 %  
$8 billion and over     0.02 %  

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the annualized effective administration fee rate was 0.05% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Columbia Management provides certain sub-administrative services to the Fund.

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. (CMID), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, serves as the Fund's distributor and principal underwriter.

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp. (CMIS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, provides shareholder services to the Fund and contracted with Boston Financial Data Services (BFDS) to serve as subtransfer agent. For its services, the Fund pays CMIS a monthly fee at the annual rate of $21.00 per open account. CMIS also receives reimbursement from the Fund for certain out-of-pocket expenses. The arrangement with BFDS has been continued by CMIS.

Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are also officers of CWAM. The Trust makes no direct payments to its officers and trustees who are affiliated with CWAM.

The Board of Trustees has appointed a Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust in accordance with federal securities regulations. The Fund, along with other affiliated funds, pays its pro-rata share of the expenses associated with the Office of the Chief Compliance Officer. These expenses are disclosed separately as "Chief compliance officer expenses" in the Statement of Operations.

The Trust offers a deferred compensation plan for its independent trustees. Under that plan, a trustee may elect to defer all or a portion of his or her compensation. Amounts deferred are retained by the Trust and may represent an unfunded obligation of the Trust. The value of amounts deferred is determined by reference to the change in value of Class Z shares of one or more series of Columbia Acorn Trust or a money market fund as specified by the trustee. Benefits under the deferred compensation plan are payable when the trustee ceases to be a member of the Board of Trustees.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Fund engaged in purchase and sales transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common directors/trustees, and/or common officers. Those purchase and sale transactions complied with provisions of Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and were $14,779 and $-, respectively.


17



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

5.  Borrowing Arrangements

The Trust participates in a $150 million credit facility, along with another Trust managed by CWAM, which was entered into to facilitate portfolio liquidity. Under the facility, interest is charged to each participating fund based on its borrowings at a rate per annum equal to the higher of Federal Funds Rate or Overnight LIBOR plus 1.25%. In addition, a commitment fee of 0.125% per annum of the unutilized line of credit is accrued and apportioned among the participating funds based on their relative net assets. The commitment fee is included in "Other expenses" in the Statement of Operations. No amounts were borrowed by the Fund under this facility during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Trust enters into this line of credit for one year durations. The Trust has secured the line of credit for the entire year of 2012.

6.  Fund Share Transactions

Proceeds and payments on Fund shares as shown in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets are in respect of the following numbers of shares:

    (Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30, 2011
  Year ended
December 31, 2010
 
Shares sold     54,200       125,113    
Shares issued in reinvestment
of dividend distributions
    11,762       24,723    
Less shares redeemed     (171,638 )     (483,784 )  
Net decrease in shares outstanding     (105,676 )     (333,948 )  

 

7.  Investment Transactions

The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales other than short-term obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $5,958,949 and $10,793,630, respectively.

8.  Information Regarding Pending and Settled Legal Proceedings

In June 2004, an action captioned John E. Gallus et al. v. American Express Financial Corp. and American Express Financial Advisors Inc. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege that they are investors in several American Express Company (now known as legacy RiverSource) mutual funds and they purport to bring the action derivatively on behalf of those funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The plaintiffs allege that fees allegedly paid to the defendants by the funds for investment advisory and administrative services are excessive. The plaintiffs seek remedies including restitution and rescission of investment advisory and distribution agreements. The plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (the District Court). In response to defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, the District Court dismissed one of plaintiffs' four claims and granted plaintiffs limited discovery. Defendants moved for summary judgment in April 2007. Summary judgment was granted in the defendants' favor on July 9, 2007. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (the Eighth Circuit) on August 8, 2007. On April 8, 2009, the Eighth Circuit reversed summary judgment and remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. On August 6, 2009, defendants filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court (the Supreme Court), asking the Supreme Court to stay the District Court proceedings while the Supreme Court considers and rules in a case captioned Jones v. Harris Associates, which involves issues of law similar to those presented in the Gallus case. On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jones v. Harris Associates, and on April 5, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuit's decision in the Gallus case and remanded the case to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On June 4, 2010, the Eighth Circuit remanded the Gallus case to the District Court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On December 9, 2010, the District Court reinstated its July 9, 2007 summary judgment order in favor of the defendants. On January 10, 2011, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eight Circuit. In response to the plaintiffs' opening appellate brief filed on March 18, 2011, the defendants filed a response brief on May 4, 2011 with the Eighth Circuit. The plaintiffs filed a reply brief on May 26, 2011.

In December 2005, without admitting or denying the allegations, American Express Financial Corporation (AEFC, which is now known as Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (Ameriprise Financial)), entered into settlement agreements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Minnesota Department of Commerce (MDOC) related to market timing activities. As a result, AEFC was censured and ordered to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and various Minnesota laws. AEFC agreed to pay disgorgement of $10 million and civil money penalties of $7 million. AEFC also agreed to retain an independent distribution consultant to assist in developing a plan for distribution of all disgorgement and civil penalties ordered by the SEC in accordance with various undertakings detailed at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/ia-2451.pdf. Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have cooperated with the SEC and the MDOC in these legal proceedings, and have made regular reports to the RiverSource, Seligman and Threadneedle funds' Boards of Directors/Trustees.

Ameriprise Financial and certain of its affiliates have historically been involved in a number of legal, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, including routine litigation, class actions, and governmental actions, concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of their business activities. Ameriprise Financial believes that the Funds are not currently the subject of, and that neither Ameriprise Financial nor any of its affiliates are the subject of, any pending legal, arbitration or regulatory proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds. Ameriprise Financial is required to make 10-Q, 10-K and, as necessary, 8-K filings with the SEC on legal and regulatory matters that relate to Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. Copies of these filings may be obtained by accessing the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

There can be no assurance that these matters, or the adverse publicity associated with them, will not result in increased fund redemptions, reduced sale of fund shares or other adverse consequences to the Funds. Further, although we believe proceedings are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds, these proceedings are subject to uncertainties and, as such, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other relief that could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of Ameriprise Financial.


18




Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

[Excerpt from:]

Wanger Advisors Trust

Management Fee Evaluation of the Senior Officer

Prepared Pursuant to the New York Attorney General's
Assurance of Discontinuance

May 2011


19



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Introduction

The New York Attorney General's Assurance of Discontinuance ("Order") entered into by Columbia Management Advisors, LLC ("CMA") and Columbia Management Distributors, Inc., ("CMDI") in February 2005, allows CMA to manage or advise a mutual fund only if the trustees of the fund appoint a "Senior Officer" to perform specified duties and responsibilities. Among these responsibilities is "managing the process by which proposed management fees (including but not limited to, advisory fees) to be charged the [funds] are negotiated so that they are negotiated in a manner which is at arms' length and reasonable and consistent with this Assurance of Discontinuance."

The Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust (collectively, the "Trusts") and each series thereof (the "Acorn funds," "WAT funds" or collectively, the "Funds") are overseen by the same Board of Trustees ("Board"). The Order provides that this Board must determine the reasonableness of proposed "management fees" by using either an annual competitive bidding process supervised by the Senior Officer or Independent Fee Consultant, or by obtaining "an annual independent written evaluation prepared by or under the direction of the Senior Officer or the Independent Fee Consultant."

"Management fees" are only part of the costs and expenses paid by mutual fund shareholders. Fund expenses can vary depending upon the class of shares held but usually include: (1) advisory fees to compensate analysts and portfolio managers for stock research and portfolio management, as well as the cost of operating a trading desk; (2) administrative expenses incurred to prepare registration statements and tax returns, calculate the funds' net asset values, maintain effective compliance procedures and perform recordkeeping services; (3) transfer agency costs for establishing accounts, accepting and disbursing funds, as well as overseeing trading in fund shares; (4) custodial expenses incurred to hold the securities purchased by the funds; and (5) distribution expenses, including commissions paid to brokers that sell the fund shares to investors. "Management fees" consist of (1) and (2), but not the other services.

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("CWAM"), is the adviser to the Funds, and at present is wholly owned by Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise"). The name Columbia Management or Columbia, is used to refer to the group of entities that manage or provide services to funds bearing the brand name "Columbia." These entities include Columbia Management Investment Advisers, ("CMIA"), the successor entity to CMA, Columbia Management Investment Services, Inc. ("CMIS") and Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. ("CMID"), the successor entity to CMDI. The Columbia asset management business, formerly owned by Bank of America Corporation ("Bank of America"), is now owned by Ameriprise.

The Change of Ownership

On September 29, 2009, Bank of America entered into a Purchase Agreement with Ameriprise providing for, among other things, the sale of CWAM to Ameriprise and the acquisition by Ameriprise of certain assets of Columbia. The sale closed on May 1, 2010. A new advisory agreement is required under these circumstances. In advance of that closing, Columbia and Ameriprise proposed that the Trusts continue, in substance, the then existing advisory agreement governing portfolio management, and the administration services agreement governing certain administration and clerical services. They proposed no material changes to these agreements, no change in services and no changes in fee levels, only those changes necessary to effect the change of ownership. The Board of Trustees approved the new advisory agreements, and on May 27, 2010, shareholders voted to approve them too. The investment management team responsible for the Funds remained with CWAM following the Ameriprise acquisition.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") effectively bars an increase in management fees for two years following a change in ownership of a fund's advisor (other than for bona fide additional investment advisory services); the purpose of this prohibition is to preclude management from financing the purchase through increased advisory fees. Ameriprise has represented to the Board that it intends to comply with these restrictions, and does not seek increased management fees at this time. Rather, Ameriprise seeks only to renew the advisory and related agreements on their existing terms.

Requirements of the Order

The Order applies to any successor to substantially all the assets of CMDI and CMA. Thus, it applies to CMIA and CMID as successors to CMA and CMDI. Under the Order, a fee evaluation must precede the execution of new or the extension of existing advisory and administration services agreements. The existing agreements continue in effect until July 31, 2011.

In conformity with the terms of the Order and past evaluations, this Evaluation addresses only the advisory and administration contracts, and does not extend to the Funds' underwriting and transfer agency agreements.

According to the Order, the Senior Officer's evaluation must consider a number of factors. These factors parallel the standard set forth in the Gartenberg case. They are following:

(1)  Management fees (including components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of CWAM for like services;

(2)  Management fees (including any components thereof) charged by other mutual fund companies for like services;

(3)  Costs to CWAM and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit;

(4)  Profit margins of CWAM and its affiliates from supplying such services;

(5)  Possible economies of scale as the Funds grow larger; and

(6)  The nature and quality of CWAM's services, including the performance of each Fund.

In 2004, the Boards of the two Trusts, then separate groups, each appointed me Senior Officer under the Order. They also determined not to pursue a competitive bidding process and instead, charged me with the responsibility of evaluating the Funds' proposed advisory and administration fee contracts with CWAM in conformity with the requirements of the Order. In discharging their responsibilities, the independent Trustees have also consulted independent, outside counsel. The Board has asked that I prepare this Evaluation.


20



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Scope of this Evaluation

This Evaluation is qualified in two respects. First, assessing such factors as cost of service, profitability, projected economies of scale, and expected quality of service, involves, at present, a significant element of uncertainty. Ameriprise and Columbia hope to effect cost savings by virtue of the increased scale of their operations. The integration of the two organizations is not, however, complete at this time, so the anticipated benefits are impossible to quantify now and hence cannot effectively be weighed in assessing the reasonableness of the proposed management fee. Profitability data is, to some extent, based on pro forma financial statements. At the same time, Ameriprise and Columbia have assured the Board that the Funds will not suffer diminished services as a result of the combination, nor do they propose to change the fee levels set forth in the existing advisory and administration services agreements. The upshot is that the Fund shareholders will, if the advisory agreements are renewed and asset levels do not decrease, pay no more than they do now, but it is too early to determine whether the change in ownership will result in material changes in the calculus of assessing the fairness of the management fee. Of necessity this must be left to future evaluations.

A second consideration concerns the new funds recently approved by the Board of Trustees. Earlier this year, CWAM and Ameriprise proposed two new Acorn funds: Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund ("Acorn Emerging Markets"), and Columbia Acorn European Fund ("Acorn European"). I issued a fee evaluation in February 2011 addressing the management fees proposed for those new funds. In March 2011, the Board approved amendments to the advisory and other agreements necessary to launch the new funds. They have not yet, however, been offered. Consequently, there is nothing to add here to the evaluation done in February, so this Evaluation does not address those funds.

Process and Independence

The objectives of the Order are to ensure the independent evaluation of the management fees paid by the Funds as well as to insure that all relevant factors are considered. In my view, this contract process has been conducted at arms-length and with independence in gathering, considering and evaluating all relevant data. At the outset of the process, the Trustees sought and obtained from Ameriprise and Columbia a comprehensive compilation of data regarding Fund performance and expenses, adviser profitability, and other information. The Trustees, acting through their Contract Committee evaluated this information thoroughly, and met often to discuss it. Performance and expense data was obtained from both Morningstar and Lipper, the leading consultants in this area. The rankings prepared by Morningstar and Lipper were independent and prepared in conformity with the methodologies employed by those organizations. Counsel for the Funds and the Independent Trustees considered, as did I, the terms and conditions of the proposed contracts.

My evaluation of the advisory contracts was shaped, as it has been in the past, by my experience as Chief Compliance Officer of the Trusts ("CCO"). As CCO, I report solely to the Board and have no reporting obligation to, or employment relationship with, Ameriprise or its affiliates. I have commented on compliance matters in evaluating the quality of service provided by CWAM.

This Report, its supporting materials and the data contained in other materials submitted to the Contract Committee, in my view, provide a thorough factual basis upon which the Board, in consultation with independent counsel as it deems appropriate, may conduct management fee negotiations that are in the best interests of the Funds' shareholders.

The Fee Reductions Mandated under the Order

Under the terms of the Order, Columbia agreed to secure certain management fee reductions for the mutual funds advised by its affiliate investment advisers. In some instances, breakpoints were also established. Although neither CWAM nor the Trusts was a party to the Order, CWAM offered and the Board accepted certain advisory fee reductions during 2005. By the terms of the Order, these fees could not be increased before November 30, 2009, and, in fact, have not been increased since. As a result of the Ameriprise acquisition, the Investment Company Act precludes any increases in management fees before May 2012 (other than for bona fide additional investment advisory services). Therefore, CWAM and Ameriprise propose the continuation of the contracts and management fees as they now exist; no increases in these fees are sought, and no reductions offered.

Conclusions

My review of the data and other material above leads to the following conclusions with respect to the factors identified in the Order.

A.  Fund Performance

The Domestic Funds: The Acorn Fund has achieved good performance over the past five years, and excellent results over longer periods. Acorn Select and Wanger Select have enjoyed better than average investment returns over the past five years, but have suffered reversals in more recent periods. Both funds expose investors to greater relative risk than the other domestic Funds. Acorn USA and its parallel, Wanger USA are the weakest performers, falling behind their benchmark and peer medians over one and five years. Thermostat is unique and therefore difficult to assess, but has outperformed its benchmark and now enjoys strong rankings from Morningstar.

The International Funds: The international Funds have delivered excellent results over the past five years, and done so while exposing investors to less risk than competing funds. They have also outperformed their benchmarks during this period, but recent results have been more restrained. The international Funds enjoy positive "alpha," confirming the value of their portfolio managers.

B.  Management Fees Relative to Peers

There is significant variance in management fee rankings across the Funds. Acorn International is the only fund that was ranked in the top quartile by both Morningstar and Lipper. The other Acorn funds tend to fall around the medians identified by one or the other service. The WAT funds are uniformly more expensive than their peers.


21



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

C.  Management Fees Relative to Institutional Account and Other Mutual Fund Accounts

CWAM's focus is on its mutual funds. The few institutional accounts it does manage vary in rate structures. Some pay advisory fees commensurate with or higher than the Acorn and WAT funds. In a few instances, however, institutional accounts pay lower advisory fees than do the Acorn funds. One such institutional account is significant in size and has been under CWAM's management for over 33 years. Furthermore, CWAM performs sub-advisory services for mutual funds managed by Ameriprise affiliates, CWAM's parent organization, at rates that are lower than those paid by the parallel Acorn funds, though sub-advisory services usually differ from those necessary for the full support of a mutual fund.

D.  Administrative Services

The Acorn and WAT funds' administrative fees are within the range of fees charged by competitors, but these rankings suffer from a lack of uniformity in the scope of services encompassed by the fee. CWAM provides excellent administrative support for all the Funds.

E.  Costs and Benefits to CWAM and its Affiliates

CWAM's direct costs do not appear excessive. Overhead and indirect costs allocated to CWAM by its parent organization, however, are significant and have varied considerably over the years. CWAM's affiliates report operating losses and although the allocations leading to these losses may bear closer scrutiny, Ameriprise affiliates do not appear to enjoy excessive "fall out" benefits from CWAM's advisory agreement with the Funds. CWAM continues, however, to enjoy substantial benefits from the use of "soft dollar" payments for research.

F.  Profitability

CWAM's profit margins may be in the upper range of its competitors, but peer profitability is difficult to assess given differences in products, operations and other factors. Furthermore, there is limited public information available with regard to the profitability of investment advisers.

G.  Economies of Scale

Economies of scale do exist at CWAM, and the Board has instituted breakpoints that reduce fess as assets increase. Though asset levels have recovered from recent lows, sustained asset growth will be required to trigger additional fee reductions under the current schedule.

H.  Nature and Quality of Service

This category includes a variety of considerations that are difficult to quantify, yet can have a significant bearing on the performance of the Acorn and WAT funds. Several areas merit comment: (1) CWAM has maintained its investment management capacity and an experienced staff; and (2) CWAM has a reasonably designed compliance program that protects shareholders.

I.  Process

In my opinion, the process of negotiating an advisory contract for the Funds has been conducted thoroughly and at arms' length. The Board's Contract Committee has sought and obtained extensive data bearing on the reasonableness of the management fees proposed by CWAM. The Trustees have sufficient information to evaluate management's proposal, and negotiate contract terms that are in the best interests of fund shareholders.

Recommendation

According to Morningstar, Acorn USA and Wanger USA have delivered performance below peer medians for the past one and five years, while imposing management fees that exceed them. Management has fashioned various initiatives to improve performance, and the Trustees should continue to monitor both Funds closely to assess the impact of those initiatives.


22



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement

Wanger Advisors Trust (the "Trust") has an investment advisory agreement (the "Advisory Agreement") with Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("CWAM") under which CWAM manages the Wanger Funds (the "Funds"). More than 75% of the trustees of the Trust (the "Trustees") are comprised of persons who have no direct or indirect interest in the Advisory Agreement and are not "interested persons" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act")) of the Trust (the "Independent Trustees"). The Trustees oversee the management of each Fund and, as required by law, determine at least annually whether to continue the Advisory Agreement for each Fund.

The Contract Committee of the Board (the "Committee"), which is comprised solely of Independent Trustees, makes recommendations to the Board regarding any proposed continuation of the Advisory Agreement. After the Committee has made its recommendations, the full Board determines whether to approve continuation of the Advisory Agreement. The Board also considers matters bearing on the Advisory Agreement at its various meetings throughout the year, meets at least quarterly with CWAM's portfolio managers and receives monthly reports from CWAM on the performance of the Funds.

In connection with their most recent consideration of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund, the Committee and all Trustees received and reviewed a substantial amount of information provided by CWAM, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ("Columbia Management") and Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise"), in response to written requests from the Independent Trustees and their independent legal counsel. Throughout the process, the Trustees had numerous opportunities to ask questions of and request additional materials from CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise.

During each meeting at which the Committee or the Independent Trustees considered the Advisory Agreement, they met in executive session with their independent legal counsel. The Committee also met with representatives of CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise on several occasions. In all, the Committee convened formally on five separate occasions to consider the continuation of the Advisory Agreement. The Board and/or some or all of the Independent Trustees met on other occasions to receive the Committee's status reports, receive presentations from CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise representatives, and to discuss outstanding issues. In addition, the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board, also comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees, reviewed the performance of the Funds and presented its findings to the Board and the Committee throughout the year. The Compliance Committee also provided information to the Committee with respect to relevant matters.

The Trustees reviewed the Advisory Agreement, as well as certain information obtained through CWAM's, Columbia Management's and Ameriprise's responses to independent legal counsel's questionnaires. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the Management Fee Evaluation dated May 2011 (the "Fee Evaluation") prepared by the Trust's chief compliance officer, senior vice president and general counsel, who also serves as the Trust's "Senior Officer," as contemplated by the Assurance of Discontinuance dated February 9, 2005 among former affiliates of CWAM and the Office of the New York Attorney General. A summary of the Fee Evaluation is included in this report.

The materials reviewed by the Committee and the Trustees included, among other items, (i) information on the investment performance of each Fund and of independently selected peer groups of funds and of the Funds' performance benchmarks over various time periods, (ii) information on each Fund's advisory fees and other expenses, including information comparing the Fund's fees and expenses to those of peer groups of funds and information about any applicable expense limitations and fee breakpoints, (iii) data on sales and redemptions of Fund shares, and (iv) information on the profitability to CWAM and Ameriprise, as well as potential "fall-out" or ancillary benefits that CWAM and its affiliates may receive as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Trustees also considered other information such as (i) CWAM's financial condition, (ii) each Fund's investment objective and strategy, (iii) the size, education and experience of CWAM's investment staff and its use of technology, external research and trading cost measurement tools, (iv) the portfolio manager compensation framework, (v) the allocation of the Funds' brokerage, and the use of "soft" commission dollars to pay for research products and services, and (vi) the resources devoted to, and the record of compliance with, the Funds' investment policies and restrictions, policies on personal securities transactions and other compliance policies.

At a meeting held on June 8, 2011, upon recommendations of the Committee, the Board of Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreement.

In considering the continuation of the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees' determination to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement are discussed below.

Nature, quality and extent of services. The Trustees reviewed the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates to the Funds under the Advisory Agreement, taking into account the investment objective and strategy of each Fund and knowledge gained from meetings with management, which were held on at least a quarterly basis. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the available resources and key personnel of CWAM and its affiliates, especially those providing investment management services to the Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Funds by CWAM and its affiliates, including: managing the execution of portfolio transactions and selecting broker-dealers for those transactions; monitoring adherence to the Funds' investment restrictions; producing shareholder reports; providing support services for the Board and committees of the Board; communicating with shareholders; serving as the Funds' administrator; and overseeing the activities of the Funds' other service providers, including monitoring for compliance with various policies and procedures as well as applicable securities laws and regulations.

The Trustees concluded that the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates to each Fund under the Advisory Agreement were appropriate for the Funds and that the Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services by CWAM. They also concluded that CWAM currently had sufficient personnel, with appropriate education and experience, to serve the Funds effectively, and that the firm had demonstrated its continuing ability to attract and retain well-qualified personnel. In addition, they took note of the quality of CWAM's compliance record.

Performance of the Funds. The Trustees received and considered detailed performance information at various meetings of the Board, the Committee and the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board throughout the year. They reviewed information comparing each Fund's performance with that of its benchmark(s) and with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups as identified by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper") and Morningstar, Inc. ("Morningstar"). The Trustees evaluated the performance of the Funds over various time periods, including over the one-, three- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010. The Trustees also considered peer performance rankings based on a rolling five-year period.

The Trustees noted that the international Funds have delivered excellent results over the past five years, and have done so while exposing investors to less risk than competing funds, according to Morningstar. They considered that the domestic Funds have had mixed results. Wanger Select had better than average results measured against its peers over the five-year period but underperformed over the one- and three-year periods ending December 31, 2010. Wanger Select outperformed its benchmark for the five-year period but underperformed over the three-year period and equaled its benchmark for the one-year period ending December 31, 2010. Wanger USA outperformed its peer group medians over the three-year period but underperformed its peer group medians over the one- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010 and also underperformed its benchmark over the same one-, three- and five-year periods. The Trustees noted that the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board concluded that Fund performance was generally satisfactory, except that Wanger USA's performance had slipped below the Lipper and Morningstar medians during the past year. The Trustees considered that CWAM had taken and was taking a number of corrective steps with respect to Wanger USA's underperformance and that the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board was monitoring the Fund's performance.


23



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement

The Trustees concluded that, although past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, the strong overall longer-term performance record of the Funds was an important factor in their evaluation of the quality of services provided by CWAM under the Advisory Agreement for each Fund.

Costs of Services and Profits Realized by CWAM. At various Committee and Board meetings, the Trustees examined detailed information on the fees and expenses of each Fund in comparison to information for comparable funds provided by Lipper and Morningstar. The Trustees reviewed data from Lipper and Morningstar and noted that all Funds other than Wanger International Select had lower total net operating expenses than their respective Lipper peer group medians and only Wanger USA had total net operating expenses above its Morningstar peer group median. As noted in the Fee Evaluation, the actual advisory fees paid by Wanger Select and Wanger USA were higher than the median advisory fee of the Funds' Morningstar peer groups and the actual advisory fee paid by each Fund was higher than the median advisory fee of each Fund's Lipper peer group. The Trustees reviewed the observations in the Fee Evaluation and noted that the Funds are assessed by Morningstar and Lipper in relation to peers selected only from the variable annuity universe.

The Trustees also considered that Ameriprise represented and agreed that advisory fees would not be raised for the two years following the close of its acquisition of CWAM (May 1, 2010) pursuant to Section 15(f) of the 1940 Act.

The Trustees also reviewed the advisory fee rates charged by CWAM for managing other investment companies (including the Columbia Acorn Funds), sub-advised funds and other institutional separate accounts, as detailed in the Fee Evaluation. The Trustees noted that the Funds' advisory fees were generally comparable to the Columbia Acorn Funds' advisory fees at the same asset levels. The Trustees also examined CWAM's institutional separate account fees for various investment strategies; in some cases those fees were higher than the advisory fees charged to the Funds, and in a few instances the fees were lower. The Trustees noted that CWAM performs significant additional services for the Funds that it does not provide to sub-advised funds or non-mutual fund clients, including administrative services, oversight of the Funds' other service providers, Trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in servicing the Funds, CWAM assumes many legal risks that it does not assume in servicing many of its non-fund clients.

The Trustees concluded that the rates of advisory fees payable to CWAM were reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services to be provided. The Trustees also concluded that the Funds' overall expense ratios were reasonable, considering the quality of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates and the investment performance of the Funds.

The Trustees reviewed the analysis of the historic profitability of CWAM in serving as each Fund's investment adviser and of CWAM and its affiliates in their relationships with each Fund. The Committee and Trustees met on several occasions with representatives from Ameriprise to discuss its methodologies for calculating profitability and allocating costs. They considered that Ameriprise calculated profitability and allocated costs on a contract-by-contract and fund-by-fund basis. The Trustees also considered the methodology used by CWAM and Ameriprise in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers and the competitive market for investment management talent. The Trustees were also provided with profitability information from Lipper and Strategic Insight, which compared CWAM's profitability to other similar investment advisers in the mutual fund industry. The Trustees concluded that CWAM's and its affiliates' profits were within a reasonable range of those of competitors with similar business models. The Trustees discussed, however, that profitability comparisons among fund managers may not always be meaningful due to the lack of consistency in data, small number of publicly-owned managers, and the fact that profitability of any investment manager is affected by numerous factors, including its particular organizational structure, the types of funds and other accounts managed, other lines of business, expense allocation methodology, capital structure and cost of capital.

Economies of Scale. At various Committee and Board meetings and other informal meetings, the Trustees considered information about the extent to which CWAM realizes economies of scale in connection with an increase in Fund assets. The Trustees also discussed the potential for Fund sales growth. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedule for each Fund includes breakpoints in the rate of fees at various asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee structure of each Fund was reflective of a sharing between CWAM and the Funds of economies of scale.

Other Benefits to CWAM. The Trustees also reviewed benefits that accrue to CWAM and its affiliates from their relationships with the Funds, as outlined in the Fee Evaluation. They noted that the Funds' transfer agency services are performed by Columbia Management Investment Services Corp., an affiliate of Ameriprise, which receives compensation from the Funds for its services provided. They considered that an affiliate of Ameriprise, Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. ("CMID"), serves as the Funds' distributor under a distribution agreement and receives no fees for its services. In addition, Columbia Management provides sub-administration services to the Funds. The Committee received information regarding the profitability of each Fund agreement with CWAM affiliates. The Committee and the Board also reviewed information about and discussed the capabilities of each affiliated entity in performing its duties.

The Trustees considered other ways that the Funds and CWAM may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other. For example, the Trustees considered CWAM's use of commissions paid by each Fund on its portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain research products and services benefiting the Funds and/or other clients of CWAM. The Committee reviewed CWAM's annual "soft dollar" report and met with representatives from CWAM to review CWAM's soft dollar spending. The Committee also considered that the Compliance Committee of the Board regularly reviewed third-party prepared reports that evaluated the quality of CWAM's execution of the Funds' portfolio transactions. The Trustees determined that CWAM's use of the Funds' "soft" commission dollars to obtain research products and services was consistent with current regulatory requirements and guidance. They also concluded that CWAM benefits from the receipt of proprietary research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Funds, and that the Funds benefit from CWAM's receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of CWAM.

After full consideration of the above factors, as well as other factors that were instructive in evaluating the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously concluded that the continuation of the Advisory Agreement was in the best interest of each Fund. On June 8, 2011, the Trustees approved continuation of the Advisory Agreement through July 31, 2012.


24



Wanger International Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Columbia Wanger Funds

Trustees

Laura M. Born
Chair of the Board

Steven N. Kaplan
Vice Chair of the Board

Michelle L. Collins
Maureen M. Culhane
Margaret M. Eisen
John C. Heaton
Charles P. McQuaid
Allan B. Muchin
David J. Rudis
David B. Small
Ralph Wanger (Trustee Emeritus)

Officers

Charles P. McQuaid
President

Ben Andrews
Vice President

Robert A. Chalupnik
Vice President

Michael G. Clarke
Assistant Treasurer

Joseph F. DiMaria
Assistant Treasurer

P. Zachary Egan
Vice President

John M. Kunka
Assistant Treasurer

Joseph C. LaPalm
Vice President

Bruce H. Lauer
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer

Louis J. Mendes III
Vice President

Robert A. Mohn
Vice President

Christopher J. Olson
Vice President

Christopher O. Petersen
Assistant Secretary

Scott R. Plummer
Assistant Secretary

Linda K. Roth-Wiszowaty
Assistant Secretary

Robert P. Scales
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President and
General Counsel

Transfer Agent,
Dividend Disbursing Agent

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp.
P.O. Box 8081
Boston, Massachusetts
02266-8081

Distributor

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc.
225 Franklin Street
Boston, Massachusetts
02110

Investment Adviser

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC
227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000
Chicago, Illinois 60606
1-888-4-WANGER
(1-888-492-6437)

Legal Counsel to the Funds

Perkins Coie LLP
Washington, DC

Legal Counsel to the Independent Trustees

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois

This report, including the schedules of investments and financial statements, is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Wanger Advisors Trust.

A description of the Fund's proxy voting policies and procedures and a copy of the Fund's voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 are available (i) on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov, and (ii) without charge, upon request, by calling 888-492-6437.

The Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund's Form N-Q is available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Pubic Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330. The Fund's complete portfolio holdings are disclosed at www.columbiamanagement.com approximately 30 days after each month end.


25




Columbia Wanger Funds

© 2011 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved.

C-1452 C (8/11) 122621




Wanger International

2011 Semiannual Report

Not FDIC insuredNo bank guaranteeMay lose value




  Wanger International

  2011 Semiannual Report

    Table of Contents

2   Understanding Your Expenses  
3   Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook  
6   Performance Review  
8   Statement of Investments  
19   Statement of Assets and Liabilities  
19   Statement of Operations  
20   Statement of Changes in Net Assets  
21   Financial Highlights  
22   Notes to Financial Statements  
26   Management Fee Evaluation of the Senior Officer  
30   Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement  

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (CWAM) is one of the leading global small- and mid-cap equity managers in the United States with 40 years of small- and mid-cap investment experience. As of June 30, 2011, CWAM managed $35.8 billion in assets, and is the investment adviser to Wanger USA, Wanger International, Wanger Select and Wanger International Select (together, the Columbia Wanger Funds) and the Columbia Acorn Family of Funds.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a mutual fund carefully before investing. For a free prospectus, which contains this and other important information about the Fund, contact your financial adviser or insurance company or contact 1-888-4-WANGER. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.

An important note: Columbia Wanger Funds are available for purchase through variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies offered by the separate accounts of participating insurance companies and qualified pension or retirement plans.

The views expressed in "Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook" and in the Performance Review reflect the current views of the respective authors. These views are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict so actual outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. These views are subject to change at any time based upon economic, market or other conditions and the respective parties disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Columbia Wanger Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any particular Columbia Wanger Fund. References to specific company securities should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice.




Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Understanding Your Expenses

As a Fund shareholder, you incur three types of costs. There are transaction costs, which generally include sales charges on purchases and may include redemption or exchange fees. There are also ongoing costs, which generally include investment advisory fees and other Fund expenses. Lastly, there may be additional fees or charges imposed by the insurance company that sponsors your variable annuity product. The information on this page is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

Analyzing your Fund's expenses

To illustrate these ongoing costs, we have provided an example and calculated the expenses paid by investors in the Fund during the period. The information in the following table is based on an initial, hypothetical investment of $1,000, which is invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period. Expense information is calculated two ways and each method provides you with different results. The amount listed in the "Actual" column is calculated using actual operating expenses and total return for the Fund. The amount listed in the "Hypothetical" column assumes that the return each year is 5% before expenses and then applies the Fund's actual expense ratio for the period to the hypothetical return. You should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate either your actual account balance at the end of the period or the expenses you paid during the period. See "Compare with other funds" for details on using the hypothetical data.

Estimating your actual expenses

To estimate the expenses that you actually paid over the period, first you will need your account balance at the end of the period.

1.  Divide your ending account balance by $1,000. For example, if an account balance was $8,600 at the end of the period, the result would be 8.6.

2.  In the section of the table below titled "Expenses paid during the period," you will find a dollar amount in the column labeled "Actual." Multiply this amount by the result from step 1. Your answer is an estimate of the expenses you paid on your account during the period.

January 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011

    Account value at the
beginning of the period ($)
  Account value at the
end of the period ($)
  Expenses paid during
the period ($)
  Fund's annualized
expense ratio (%)*
 
    Actual   Hypothetical   Actual   Hypothetical   Actual   Hypothetical    
Wanger International     1,000.00       1,000.00       1029.60       1,019.49       5.38       5.36       1.07    

 

*Expenses paid during the period are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, then multiplied by the number of days in the Fund's most recent fiscal half-year and divided by 365.

Had the investment adviser not waived fees or reimbursed a portion of expenses, account value at the end of the period would have been reduced.

It is important to note that the expense amounts shown in the table are meant to highlight only ongoing costs of investing in the Fund. Expenses paid during the period do not include any insurance charges imposed by your insurance company's separate account. The hypothetical example provided is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds whose shareholders may incur transaction costs.

Compare with other funds

Since all mutual funds are required to include the same hypothetical calculations about expenses in shareholder reports, you can use this information to compare the ongoing cost of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare the 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples of other funds. As you compare hypothetical examples of other funds, it is important to note that hypothetical examples are meant to highlight the ongoing cost of investing in a fund and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges, redemption fees or exchange fees that may be incurred by shareholders of other funds. Expenses paid during the period do not include any insurance charges imposed by your insurance company's separate accounts.


2



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook

Just five to seven years ago, it was widely believed that North American natural gas resources were being rapidly depleted. Today, the outlook appears to be very much improved thanks to the ingenuity of a few individuals and a process that should provide natural gas for decades to come.

In 1825, some 34 years before Colonel Edwin Drake1 drilled the first oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania, William Aaron Hart drilled the first natural gas well, in shale located in Fredonia, New York. By August of that year, five structures in the village were illuminated by natural gas and by November there were 36 gas lights in the village. In 1857, Preston Barmore, the superintendent of the Fredonia Natural Gas Co., was not satisfied with the production from a 122 foot well so he exploded crevices of rock in the well, increasing the supply of gas. Within a few years, the village had 150 gas lights.2

Plenty of natural gas was subsequently found in sandstone formations under impermeable rock, in similar formations as oil, or accompanied by oil. Extracting this natural gas was less costly than drilling for gas in shale, so shale exploration all but ended. Millions of miles of gas pipelines were built, and demand for natural gas grew.3 U.S.-marketed production rose to 1 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of natural gas by 1923, and has ranged from 16.9 to 22.6 TCF since 1973.4 Natural gas is used for heating and manufacturing, and is a feedstock for fertilizers, plastics and chemicals.

Recent Natural Gas Shortages

In 2004, Julian Darley wrote High Noon for Natural Gas, The New Energy Crisis. He reviewed Hubbert's Peak, a theory named after the geologist who researched oil finding and production curves and then correctly predicted that U.S. oil production would peak around 1970. Darley applied Hubbert's Peak to natural gas data and concluded that North American gas production had also peaked and was likely to plunge.

Darley wrote, "The United States and Canada are entering a natural gas crisis ...North American supply is simply no longer able to meet desired consumption."5 He added, "...the worst immediate problem confronting the United States (and Canada) is not oil, but natural gas. It is a natural gas shortage that could seriously interrupt the U.S. economy..."6 Darley noted that the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) made enormous upward revisions for production of natural gas from shale, tight sands and coal beds, but he believed such gains would fail to occur. Instead, importing of liquefied natural gas (LNG) would have to be an interim solution. But LNG, Darley stated, had safety and security risks. Geopolitically, relying on imported LNG would also be problematic, as Russia and Iran had the largest reserves of natural gas.

Darley believed that the 300-plus new natural gas-fired electric generating stations, built between 1980 and 2003 at a cost of $100 billion, were huge mistakes. The power companies had apparently reviewed a 1999 National Petroleum Council report that stated North American natural gas supplies would grow. Darley labeled that report as an "example of the kind of cornucopian delusion that characterizes many in government and most in industry, who believe in nothing but economics and the miracle of capitalism with its unlimited ability to find substitutes for everything."7

Darley thought that with worldwide Peak Oil imminent and North American natural gas production plunging, energy was to become scarce, and the industrial revolution would unwind. He advocated that people should be able to obtain their daily needs within walking distance from where they lived. His long-term solution was to depopulate the earth, such that mankind no longer mined the planet and consumed only the energy that the sun regularly provides. At one child per woman, the population of the earth would be back to one billion in about one hundred years.

Domestic natural gas production fell between 2001 and 2005 and prices increased between 2002 and 2008.8 Most major oil companies and analysts agreed that natural gas production in North America was peaking, and that the U.S. would need substantial imports of LNG. I remember going to an energy conference in early 2006 where this view was widespread. Darley's nightmare scenario seemed to be coming true.

Back in the Gas Fields

George Mitchell has been called the Father of the Barnett Natural Gas Field, located in and around Fort Worth, Texas. Over an 18-year period beginning in 1981, his company, Mitchell Energy and Development, experimented with fracturing gas-bearing shale that is located between 6,000 and 14,000 feet below the surface. Geologists knew that shale had lots of pores and the ability to store natural gas, but since pores in shale are rarely interconnected, gas flows poorly through shale. Initial attempts to extract this gas were costly, and production was not economical. Eventually, the company developed a "light sand frac" method that was effective and used less fluid. The combination of reduced costs and rising natural gas prices made such drilling profitable. Mitchell drilled many wells at the Barnett field, producing far more natural gas than most people expected.9

Mitchell needed more funding and sold his company to Devon Energy, a larger, independent producer. Devon had expertise in an additional technology, horizontal drilling, which tilted drill holes at angles or sideways once they hit pay dirt. More gas-bearing shale was consequently exposed to the well. With this added technology, the company drilled 55 wells in the Barnett field in 2003 and the shale gas boom began.10 Some 13,500 gas wells have been drilled in the Barnett field since 199711 and the Barnett field accounted for 6% of total natural gas production in the United States in 2010.12

Drilling at other shale gas formations has also jumped. U.S. shale gas production increased


3



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

12-fold in the last decade and currently accounts for about 25% of U.S. natural gas production.13 With greater production, natural gas wellhead prices halved from 2008 to 2010. In its yearly forecast in 2010, the EIA doubled its estimate of U.S. shale gas production for 2035 and predicts shale gas production will hit 46% of U.S. consumption that year.14 Imports will drop from 11% of natural gas consumption in 2009 to 1%.15 With "economics and the miracle of capitalism"16 we won't need to revert to Darley's dark ages any time soon. The EIA also believes shale gas totaling at least six-times U.S. reserves is recoverable in at least 32 other countries.17

Energy Mix

In 2009, Robert Hefner published The Grand Energy Transition. The book provides perspectives on past and future sources and uses of energy. Hefner believes that energy usage naturally transitions from solids (wood and coal) to liquids (oil) and then to gasses (natural gas, wind and hopefully nuclear fusion). He sees newer fuels as superior to older ones, with each new fuel facilitating new technologies, improvements in the environment and higher living standards.

The transition to coal from wood powered the industrial revolution and allowed millions of acres of forests to regrow. Coal then fell from 80% of the world energy market in 1900 to about 28% currently. Oil ascended to 48% of the world's energy by 1973, displacing much dirty coal and revolutionizing transportation via the introduction of automobiles and airplanes. Oil subsequently dropped to about 36% of world energy consumption. Natural gas has risen from 10% of the world's energy in 1950 to 24% currently.18

Believing in global warming, Hefner notes that the transition from wood to coal to oil to natural gas slashed carbon content and increased hydrogen content of fuels with each transition. Since burning carbon creates carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary greenhouse gas, and burning hydrogen creates water, the natural transitions from solids to liquids to gasses slow global warming. Burning natural gas creates 44% less CO2 than burning coal and 29% less than burning oil. Burning natural gas also emits about 80% less nitrogen oxides, over 90% lower particulates and over 99% less sulfur dioxide than coal or oil.19

Under an earlier belief that the U.S. was running out of natural gas, the Natural Gas Policy Act (NPGA) and the Fuel Use Act were passed in 1978. The NGPA immediately deregulated prices for gas produced from deep wells and phased out other price controls.20 The Fuel Use Act mandated the phase out of natural gas for electric generation and restricted its industrial uses. Prices for deep gas jumped, but so did drilling. Production grew, and with demand depressed by the Fuel Use Act, prices then collapsed. There was an excess supply of natural gas, known as the "gas bubble," until the year 2000.

Hefner believes the 1978 laws slowed the natural transition from coal and oil to natural gas. As a result of the Fuel Use Act, some 100,000 megawatts of coal-fired electric generating capacity was built in the United States through 1989 that has emitted 15 billion metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.21 Hefner believes that the construction of the coal burning plants, not the natural gas burning plants, was the big mistake.

Hefner subscribes to Peak Oil occurring soon, but sees many decades of abundant and relatively cheap natural gas. Hence, he predicts the grand energy transition to natural gas will continue, and he believes natural gas will be a bridge fuel to renewable energy and possibly nuclear fusion. Natural gas complements wind energy quite well, as gas-burning electric plants can quickly power up when the wind slows.

Some 12 million vehicles worldwide are powered by natural gas. Of that number, there are estimated to be 110,000 natural gas-powered vehicles in the United States,22 including thousands of trucks serving the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles,23 more than 11,000 buses24 and approximately 12,000 Honda Civic GX cars.25 These vehicles burn natural gas currently priced at one-third of the energy equivalent price of oil. Hefner believes that half the autos in the United States should be powered by natural gas, and the dirtiest, coal-burning electric plants should be replaced by natural gas plants. Yearly gas consumption would rise by 13 TCF, but could be met by increased shale gas production.26

Investment Implications

We believe that innovations in producing gas from shale have indeed transformed the U.S. energy outlook. We profitably invested in some of the pioneers of shale gas though, with the current glut of natural gas, the stocks now look less attractive. Supplies of gas may remain high in the short term as some unprofitable drilling persists in order to keep lease rights. Over time, the low prices will likely result in reduced drilling and more constrained supplies. When this happens, natural gas prices should rise to a level where drilling and production are moderately profitable. We continue to look for suppliers and service companies participating in shale gas production. Some shale oil fields are now being developed, including the Bakken field in North Dakota and Canada and the Eagle Ford field in Texas. At this point, we don't think there will be enough shale oil production to revolutionize the oil market, but we do believe we have found some attractive stocks participating in those developments.

Charles P. McQuaid
President and Chief Investment Officer
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC


4



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

The information and data provided in this analysis are derived from sources that we deem to be reliable and accurate. These views are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict so actual outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. The views/opinions expressed in this essay are those of the author and not of the Columbia Wanger Fund's Board, are subject to change at any time based upon economic, market or other conditions, may differ from views expressed by other Columbia Management associates and the respective parties disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Columbia Wanger Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any particular Columbia Wanger Fund.

1  Colonel Edwin Drake was an American oil driller, credited with being the first to drill for oil in the United States.

2  Lash, Eileen and Gary, "The Early History of Natural Gas, Kicking Down the Well," The SUNY Fredonia Shale Research Institute, June 3, 2011, http://www.fredonia.edu/shaleinstitute/history.asp.

3  U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/ngpipeline/index.html.

4  EIA data, including imports primarily from Canada, states the U.S. has been using about 23 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas a year, including about 6.6 TCF for industrial purposes. www.eia.gov.

5  Darley, Julian, High Noon for Natural Gas, The New Energy Crisis, (White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing Company 2004) p. 13.

6  Ibid., p. 2.

7  Ibid., p. 79-80.

8  According to EIA data, domestic natural gas production fell from 20.6 TCF in 2001 to 18.9 TCF in 2005. Average annual wellhead prices rose from $3 to $5 in 2002-2003 to $6 to $8 from 2006-2008. www.eia.gov.

9  Airhart, Marc, "The Father of the Barnett Natural Gas Field," http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-father.html.

10  Yergin, Daniel, "Stepping on the Gas," Wall Street Journal, April 2, 2011.

11  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

12  U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas, Development in the United States: A Primer," April 2009, p. ES-1, http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/naturalgas_general/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

13  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

14  Lomax, Simon, "Shale-Gas Output May Double by 2035, Reducing Energy Imports, U.S. Says," Bloomberg, December 16, 2010, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-16/natural-gas-production-from-shale-may-double-by-35-u-s-agency-forecasts.html.

15  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

16  Darley, Julian, op. cit., p. 79-80.

17  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

18  Hefner III, Robert A., "The Grand Energy Transition," (Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2009) p. 27.

19  U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas, Development in the United States: A Primer," April 2009, p. 5, http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/naturalgas_general/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

20  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 120-121. Having been an independent explorer for natural gas, Hefner was well aware that gas existed in locations independently of oil. (He has been called the "Father of Deep Natural Gas" as his company drilled very deep wells finding only natural gas at very high pressure.) In the 1970s when geologists for major oil companies testified to Congress that the U.S. was running out of natural gas, Hefner dissented, believing that the shortage was caused by price controls in place since 1954. Price controls cause shortages of valuable commodities by boosting demand and restraining supplies.

21  Ibid., p. 122.

22  Natural Gas Vehicles of America, http://www.ngvc.org/mktplace/index.html. Accessed July 20, 2011.

23  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 201.

24  Natural Gas Vehicles of America, http://www.ngvc.org/mktplace/index.html. Accessed July 20, 2011.

25  Oberman, Mira, "The Greenest Car You've (Likely) Never Heard Of," Agence France-Presse, April 11, 2011.

26  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 203.


5



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Performance Review Wanger International

   
Louis J. Mendes III
Co-Portfolio Manager
  Christopher J. Olson
Co-Portfolio Manager
 

 

Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Please visit columbiamanagement.com for performance updates for the most recent month-end.

Wanger International was up 2.96% for the semiannual period ended June 30, 2011, slightly ahead of its primary benchmark, the S&P Global Ex-U.S. Between $500M and $5B Index, which gained 2.63%.

In Japan, the March 2011 earthquake and associated tsunami left hundreds of thousands homeless and many more worrying about looming threats from the damaged nuclear facility in Fukushima. Japan represented an average 17% of the portfolio during the period, which was in line with the benchmark weight. Japanese equities quickly fell about 20% once news of the disaster broke. By the end of March, when the impact had been more fully absorbed, Japanese equities had generally recovered to within 5% to 10% of their pre-temblor levels. The Fund's Japanese holdings put up a 2.8% USD return for the six-month period, led by two of the Fund's internet-related stocks: Gree, a social networking site and game developer, and Start Today, an online apparel retailer. These stocks were up 78% and 50%, respectively, for the half year period, likely buoyed by high valuations assigned to U.S. internet-related businesses in recent public and private market transactions. None of the Fund's holdings had significant assets destroyed by the quake.

Outside Japan, the Fund's top contributor for the period was Melco Crown Entertainment, a casino operator in Macau. Its stock was up 101% for the half year period. Swedish measurement equipment manufacturer Hexagon gained 16% on strong revenue growth driven mainly by its exposure to emerging markets. Wirecard, a German online payment processor and risk manager, was up 31% for the six-month period, also on strong revenue growth spurred, in part, by the introduction of a new prepaid cash card.

Laggards during the period included Petropavlovsk, a UK-domiciled gold and iron ore miner with mines in Russia. Its stock was off 34% for the period on investor worries that more delays and capital would be required to complete the company's projects. This came on top of general weakness among gold mining stocks. Central European Distribution, a Polish spirits distributor operating in Central and Eastern Europe, did a nice job consolidating the Polish market but then got into trouble after overpaying for Russian production assets in 2008. This also proved to be a distraction to management, causing them to lose market share in their core Polish operations. Its stock was off 51% for the period.

Eurozone sovereign risk leads headlines. Europe, including countries not part of the common euro currency, is home to almost 40% of the Fund's assets. This is an overweight position, with risk mitigated and opportunity enhanced, we believe, by the fact that many of these European holdings have significant revenues and earnings outside of Europe. While we are not economists and do not structure the portfolio according to macroeconomic precepts, we expect the euro to survive the present crisis. We believe the protracted public debate reflects the inevitably messy process of allocating economic and political pain among creditor and debtor countries, and private and public actors. Indeed, creditor countries who seek tighter fiscal coordination among eurozone countries going forward have little to gain in ending the crisis until they have extracted such concessions. Markets, however, do not like uncertainty and continued volatility is likely until a solution is reached.

International investing involves special risks, including foreign taxation, currency risks, risks associated with possible differences in financial standards and other risks associated with future political and economic developments. Stocks of small- and mid-cap companies pose special risks, including possible illiquidity and greater price volatility than stocks of larger, more established companies. Investing in emerging markets may involve greater risks than investing in more developed countries. In addition, concentration of investments in a single region may result in greater volatility.

Portfolio holdings are subject to change periodically and may not be representative of current holdings.

Fund's Positions in Mentioned Holdings

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

Hexagon     1.5 %  
Melco Crown Entertainment     1.4    
Wirecard     0.6    
Gree     0.5    
Start Today     0.4    
Petropavlovsk     0.3    
Central European Distribution     0.2    


6



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Growth of a $10,000 Investment in Wanger International
May 3, 1995 (inception date) through June 30, 2011

Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Performance results reflect any fee waivers or reimbursements of Fund expenses by the investment adviser and/or any of its affiliates. Absent these fee waivers and/or expense reimbursement arrangements, performance results would have been lower. For daily and most recent month-end performance updates, please call 1-888-4-WANGER.

This graph compares the results of $10,000 invested in Wanger International on May 3, 1995 (the date the Fund began operations) through June 30, 2011, to the S&P Global Ex-U.S. Between $500M and $5B Index with dividends and capital gains reinvested. Although the index is provided for use in assessing the Fund's performance, the Fund's holdings may differ significantly from those in the index.

Top 10 Holdings

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

1. Hexagon (Sweden)
Measurement Equipment & Software
  1.5
 
%  
2. Melco Crown Entertainment (Hong Kong)
Macau Casino Operator
  1.4
 
 
3. Olam International (Singapore)
Agriculture Supply Chain Manager
  1.3
 
 
4. Localiza Rent A Car (Brazil)
Car Rental
  1.2
 
 
5. Kansai Paint (Japan)
Paint Producer in Japan, India, China & Southeast Asia
  1.1
 
 
6. Imtech (Netherlands)
Electromechanical & Information & Communications Technologies
Installation & Maintenance
  1.0
 
 
7. Intertek Group (United Kingdom)
Testing, Inspection & Certification Services
  1.0
 
 
8. Naspers (South Africa)
Media in Africa, China, Russia & Other Emerging Markets
  1.0
 
 
9. Fugro (Netherlands)
Sub-sea Oilfield Services
  0.9
 
 
10. Zhaojin Mining Industry (China)
Gold Mining & Refining in China
  0.9
 
 

Top 5 Countries

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

Japan     16.2 %  
United Kingdom     8.2    
Netherlands     6.4    
Canada     5.8    
France     5.1    

 

Results as of June 30, 2011

    2nd quarter   Year to date   1 year   5 years   10 years  
Wanger International     1.61 %     2.96 %     32.59 %     7.75 %     11.57 %  
S&P Global Ex-U.S.
Between $500M and
$5B Index*
    0.72       2.63       34.29       7.09       12.71    
MSCI EAFE Index (Net)     1.56       4.98       30.36       1.48       5.66    
Lipper International
Growth Funds Variable
Underlying Index
    1.49       3.89       31.22       3.01       4.89    

 

* The Fund's primary benchmark.

NAV as of 6/30/11: $34.93

Performance numbers reflect all Fund expenses but do not include any fees and expenses imposed under your variable annuity or life insurance policy or qualified pension or retirement plan. If performance included the effect of these additional charges, it would be lower.

The Fund's annual operating expense ratio is 1.04%. The annual operating expense ratio is as stated in the Fund's prospectus that is current as of the date of this report. Differences in expense ratios disclosed elsewhere in this report may result from including fee waivers and reimbursements as well as different time periods used in calculating the ratios.

All results shown assume reinvestment of distributions and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the sale of Fund shares.

The S&P Global Ex-U.S. Between $500M and $5B Index is a subset of the broad market selected by the index sponsor representing the mid- and small-cap developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States. The Morgan Stanley Capital International Europe, Australasia, Far East (MSCI EAFE) Index (Net) is a capitalization-weighted index that tracks the total return of common stocks in 22 developed-market countries within Europe, Australasia and the Far East. The returns of the MSCI EAFE Index (Net) are presented net of taxes. The Lipper International Growth Funds Variable Underlying Index is an equally weighted representation of the 30 largest variable insurance underlying funds in the Lipper International Growth Funds Variable Underlying Classification. Indexes are not managed and do not incur fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Lipper Inc., a widely respected data provider in the industry, calculates an average total return (assuming reinvestment of distributions) for mutual funds with investment objectives similar to those of the Fund. Lipper makes no adjustment for the effect of sales loads.

Portfolio characteristics and holdings are subject to change periodically and may not be representative of current characteristics and holdings.


7




Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Equities – 97.7%  
    Europe – 38.9%  
    United Kingdom – 8.2%  
  270,000     Intertek Group
Testing, Inspection & Certification Services
  $ 8,549,734    
  770,784     Chemring
Defense Manufacturer of Countermeasures & Energetics
    7,917,251    
  7,592,066     Archipelago Resources (a)
Gold Mining Projects in Indonesia, Vietnam & the Philippines
    7,524,172    
  2,250,000     Charles Taylor (b)
Insurance Services
    5,470,876    
  414,700     JLT Group
International Business Insurance Broker
    4,532,553    
  495,500     Serco
Facilities Management
    4,393,774    
  7,989,700     Workspace Group
United Kingdom Real Estate
    3,878,981    
  535,000     GlobeOp Financial Services
Hedge Fund Administrator
    3,361,610    
  84,000     Next
Clothes & Home Retailer in the United Kingdom
    3,134,469    
  240,000     Petropavlovsk
Gold & Iron Ore Mining in Russia
    2,811,874    
  1,201,000     Kesa Electricals
Europe's Leading Electricals Retailers
    2,654,231    
  754,000     Cobham
Aerospace Components
    2,560,641    
  349,600     Premier Oil (a)
Oil & Gas Producer in Europe, Pakistan & Asia
    2,505,832    
  367,935     Abcam
Online Sales of Antibodies
    2,460,982    
  90,000     Rotork
Valve Actuators for Oil & Water Pipelines
    2,435,353    
  223,973     Smith & Nephew
Medical Equipment & Supplies
    2,390,447    
  103,604     Tullow Oil
Oil & Gas Producer
    2,061,864    
  129,200     Shaftesbury
London Prime Retail REIT
    1,094,859    
  325,292     FlyBe (a)
Largest European Regional Airline
    960,623    
  556,698     PureCircle (a)
Natural Sweeteners
    790,724    
  250,000     SKIL Ports & Logistics (a)
Indian Container Port Project
    782,414    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  238,400     Sterling Resources (a)   $ 407,859    
  161,600     Sterling Resources (a)(c)
Oil & Gas Exploration—Europe
    270,939    
      72,952,062    
    Netherlands – 6.4%  
  261,711     Imtech
Electromechanical & Information & Communications
Technologies Installation & Maintenance
    9,256,496    
  112,769     Fugro
Sub-sea Oilfield Services
    8,130,807    
  212,414     Unit 4 Agresso
Business Software Development
    7,679,240    
  154,474     Vopak
World's Largest Operator of Petroleum & Chemical
Storage Terminals
    7,569,312    
  317,749     Aalberts Industries
Flow Control & Heat Treatment
    7,427,832    
  180,944     Koninklijke TenCate
Advanced Textiles & Industrial Fabrics
    7,326,093    
  163,566     Arcadis
Engineering Consultants
    4,001,483    
  30,034     Core Laboratories
Oil & Gas Reservoir Consulting
    3,349,992    
  144,375     USG People
Temporary Staffing Services
    2,496,682    
      57,237,937    
    France – 5.1%  
  87,730     Neopost
Postage Meter Machines
    7,536,609    
  68,800     Eurofins Scientific
Food, Pharmaceuticals & Materials Screening & Testing
    6,337,409    
  113,000     Gemalto
Smart Card Products & Solutions
    5,403,511    
  38,500     Rubis
Tank Storage & Liquefied Petroleum Gas Distribution
    4,884,075    
  152,500     Teleperformance
Call Center Operator
    4,481,561    
  76,000     Mersen
Advanced Industrial Materials
    4,287,222    
  122,500     Saft
Niche Battery Manufacturer
    4,212,812    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
8



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    France – 5.1% (cont)  
  44,000     Pierre & Vacances
Vacation Apartment Lets
  $ 3,668,241    
  29,600     Norbert Dentressangle
Leading European Logistics & Transport Group
    3,497,912    
  261,133     Hi-Media (a)
Online Advertiser in Europe
    1,563,956    
      45,873,308    
    Germany – 4.0%  
  86,500     Rheinmetall
Defense & Automotive
    7,657,987    
  309,494     Wirecard
Online Payment Processing & Risk Management
    5,531,615    
  19,609     Rational
Commercial Ovens
    5,168,240    
  201,582     Rhoen-Klinikum
Health Care Services
    4,864,272    
  56,636     CTS Eventim
Event Ticket Sales
    3,913,527    
  23,100     Vossloh
Rail Infrastructure & Diesel Locomotives
    3,241,981    
  75,800     Elringklinger
Automobile Components
    2,689,775    
  45,390     Deutsche Beteiligungs
Private Equity Investment Management
    1,280,244    
  31,507     Dürr
Automotive Plant Engineering & Associated
Capital Equipment
    1,279,316    
      35,626,957    
    Switzerland – 3.7%  
  3,113     Sika
Chemicals for Construction & Industrial Applications
    7,505,264    
  44,616     Kuehne & Nagel
Freight Forwarding/Logistics
    6,771,337    
  26,486     Geberit (a)
Plumbing Supplies
    6,275,363    
  34,030     Partners Group
Private Markets Asset Management
    6,022,794    
  98,509     Bank Sarasin & Cie
Private Banking
    3,901,695    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  23,000     Dufry Group (a)
Operates Airport Duty Free & Duty Paid Shops
  $ 2,897,056    
      33,373,509    
    Sweden – 2.6%  
  530,873     Hexagon
Measurement Equipment & Software
    13,076,268    
  572,110     Sweco
Engineering Consultants
    5,630,470    
  78,500     Unibet (a)
European Online Gaming Operator
    1,703,365    
  134,726     East Capital Explorer
Sweden-based RUS/CEE Investment Fund
    1,565,541    
  102,909     Orc Software
Software for Securities Trading, Analysis & Risk Management
    1,370,721    
      23,346,365    
    Italy – 2.5%  
  37,000     Tod's
Leather Shoes & Bags
    4,949,723    
  306,600     Ansaldo STS
Railway Systems Integrator
    4,297,212    
  615,959     Credito Emiliano
Italian Regional Bank
    3,896,281    
  1,422,000     CIR
Italian Holding Company
    3,561,269    
  519,100     Geox
Apparel & Shoe Maker
    3,110,457    
  582,900     Terna (d)
Italian Power Transmission
    2,710,007    
      22,524,949    
    Denmark – 1.3%  
  43,493     Novozymes
Industrial Enzymes
    7,077,739    
  21,930     SimCorp
Software for Investment Managers
    4,327,672    
      11,405,411    
    Ireland – 1.1%  
  1,383,500     United Drug
Irish Pharmaceutical Wholesaler & Outsourcer
    4,738,838    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
9



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Ireland – 1.1% (cont)  
  49,007     Paddy Power
Irish Betting Services
  $ 2,664,320    
  42,721     Aryzta
Baked Goods
    2,263,411    
      9,666,569    
    Portugal – 0.6%  
  1,023,200     Redes Energéticas Nacionais
Portuguese Power Transmission & Gas Transportation
    3,678,323    
  3,324,182     Banco Comercial Português (a)
Largest Portuguese Banking Franchise
    1,976,430    
      5,654,753    
    Iceland – 0.6%  
  5,215,901     Marel (a)
Largest Manufacturer of Poultry & Fish
Processing Equipment
    5,521,403    
    Spain – 0.6%  
  81,403     Red Eléctrica de España
Spanish Power Transmission
    4,913,687    
    Czech Republic – 0.5%  
  16,591     Komercni Banka
Leading Czech Republic Universal Bank
    4,046,091    
    Finland – 0.4%  
  137,241     Stockmann (d)
Department Store & Fashion Retailer in
Scandinavia & Russia
    3,888,851    
    Russia – 0.4%  
  109,900     Mail.ru – GDR (a)(c)
Internet Social Networking & Games for Russian Speakers
    3,650,878    
    Norway – 0.3%  
  269,948     Atea
Leading Nordic IT Hardware/Software Re-seller &
Installation Company
    2,839,504    
    Greece – 0.2%  
  953,100     Intralot
Lottery & Gaming Systems & Services
    2,031,742    
    Poland – 0.2%  
  136,143     Central European Distribution (a)
Largest Spirits Company in Central & Eastern Europe
    1,524,802    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Belgium – 0.2%  
  20,723     EVS Broadcast Equipment
Digital Live Mobile Production Software & Systems
  $ 1,402,802    
        Total Europe     347,481,580    
    Asia – 36.8%  
    Japan – 16.2%  
  1,114,589     Kansai Paint
Paint Producer in Japan, India, China & Southeast Asia
    10,155,232    
  510,000     Asics
Footwear & Apparel
    7,612,414    
  2,835     Seven Bank
ATM Processing Services
    5,665,093    
  254,542     Aeon Delight
Facility Maintenance & Management
    5,132,361    
  920     Orix JREIT
Diversified REIT
    5,083,936    
  219,500     Hoshizaki Electric
Commercial Kitchen Equipment
    4,872,341    
  2,130     Advance Residence Investment
Residential REIT
    4,458,022    
  192,100     Gree (a)
Mobile Social Networking Game Developer/Platform
    4,199,447    
  442,151     Kamigumi
Port Cargo Handling & Logistics
    4,132,253    
  124,841     Kintetsu World Express
Airfreight Logistics
    4,099,788    
  279,000     Kuraray
Special Resin, Fine Chemical, Fibers & Textures
    4,087,353    
  93,586     Hamamatsu Photonics
Optical Sensors for Medical & Industrial Applications
    4,046,364    
  183,000     Asahi Diamond Industrial
Consumable Diamond Tools
    4,000,869    
  38,799     Nakanishi
Dental Tools & Machinery
    3,997,635    
  3,321     Wacom
Computer Graphic Illustration Devices
    3,878,247    
  3,406     Jupiter Telecommunications
Largest Cable Service Provider in Japan
    3,810,547    
  88,811     Ain Pharmaciez
Dispensing Pharmacy/Drugstore Operator
    3,654,136    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
10



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Japan – 16.2% (cont)  
  115,803     Ibiden
Electronic Parts & Ceramics
  $ 3,625,550    
  178,060     Ushio
Industrial Light Sources
    3,520,654    
  109,116     Tsumura
Traditional Chinese/Japanese Herbal Rx Drugs (Kampo)
    3,488,309    
  167,847     Daiseki
Waste Disposal & Recycling
    3,398,207    
  169,100     Start Today
Online Japanese Apparel Retailer
    3,376,771    
  70,286     Makita
Power Tools
    3,275,253    
  3,233,700     Shinsei Bank
Commercial Bank
    3,234,515    
  710     Osaka Securities Exchange
Osaka Securities Exchange
    3,169,362    
  138,518     Glory
Currency Handling Systems & Related Equipment
    3,120,048    
  127,225     Aeon Mall
Suburban Shopping Mall Developer, Owner & Operator
    3,081,996    
  400     Fukuoka
Diversified REIT in Fukuoka
    3,011,519    
  948,000     Nippon Sheet Glass
Sheet Glass for Building & Automotive Use
    2,947,582    
  317,000     Shimadzu
Analytical Instruments, Medical & Industrial Equipment
    2,903,459    
  173,066     Torishima Pump Manufacturing
Industrial Pump for Power Generation & Water
Supply Systems
    2,777,885    
  235,509     Japan Airport Terminal
Airport Terminal Operator at Haneda
    2,742,879    
  261,000     Sintokogio
Automated Casting Machines, Surface Treatment
Systems & Consumables
    2,679,547    
  99,446     Icom
Two Way Radio Communication Equipment
    2,559,091    
  360     Kakaku.com
Online Price Comparison Services for Consumers
    2,531,463    
  86,458     Miura
Industrial Boiler Maker, Seller, Distributor & Manufacturer
    2,506,276    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  62,500     Pigeon
Baby Care Products
  $ 2,054,309    
  525     Mori Hills
Tokyo Centric Diversified REIT
    1,921,078    
      144,811,791    
    Singapore – 4.5%  
  5,053,000     Olam International
Agriculture Supply Chain Manager
    11,232,848    
  7,100,000     Mapletree Logistics Trust
Industrial Property Landlord
    5,323,786    
  3,000,000     CDL Hospitality Trust
Hotel Owner/Operator
    5,035,721    
  2,987,072     Ascendas REIT
Industrial Property Landlord
    4,968,257    
  4,952,000     Mapletree Industrial Trust
Industrial Property Landlord
    4,721,954    
  575,200     Singapore Exchange
Singapore Equity & Derivatives Market Operator
    3,534,542    
  4,000,000     Mapletree Commercial Trust (a)
Retail & Office Property Landlord
    2,816,901    
  1,840,000     Goodpack
International Bulk Container Leasing
    2,744,634    
      40,378,643    
    Hong Kong – 4.4%  
  984,200     Melco Crown Entertainment – ADR (a)
Macau Casino Operator
    12,568,234    
  2,459,000     Lifestyle International
Mid- to High-end Department Store Operator in
Hong Kong & China
    7,257,393    
  3,390,500     Mongolian Mining (a)
Coking Coal Mining in Mongolia
    4,192,444    
  4,315,000     Hutchison Port Holdings Trust (a)
Southern China Container Ports
    3,646,175    
  5,000,000     Sa Sa International
Cosmetics Retailer
    3,212,373    
  1,183,000     L'Occitane International (a)
Skin Care & Cosmetics Producer
    3,168,953    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
11



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Hong Kong – 4.4% (cont)  
  1,650,000     MGM China Holdings (a)
Macau Casino Operator
  $ 3,044,836    
  110,000     Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing
Hong Kong Equity & Derivatives Market Operator
    2,317,674    
      39,408,082    
    China – 4.0%  
  3,854,000     Zhaojin Mining Industry
Gold Mining & Refining in China
    7,950,660    
  1,452,000     China Yurun Food
Meat Processor in China
    4,105,607    
  6,096,200     China Communication Services
China's Telecom Infrastructure Service Provider
    3,609,696    
  32,000     New Oriental Education &
Technology – ADR (a)
Education Service Provider
    3,575,040    
  34,884,524     RexLot Holdings
Lottery Equipment Supplier in China
    3,374,425    
  3,300,000     Jiangsu Expressway
Chinese Toll Road Operator
    3,025,189    
  830,000     ENN Energy
China's Largest Private Gas Operator
    2,830,271    
  37,000     51job – ADR (a)
An Integrated Human Resources Service Provider
    2,076,810    
  1,200,000     Shandong Weigao
Vertically Integrated Hospital Consumable Manufacturing
    1,742,153    
  3,295,500     Wasion Group
Electronic Power Meter Total Solution Provider
    1,551,330    
  997,300     Want Want
Chinese Branded Consumer Food Company
    968,334    
  55,500     Noah Holdings – ADR (a)(d)
Wealth Management Product Distributor in China
    623,820    
  99,400     Zuoan Fashion (a)
Men's Apparel Provider in China
    555,646    
      35,988,981    
    Taiwan – 3.6%  
  831,700     Simplo Technology
World's Largest Notebook Battery Pack Supplier
    6,722,289    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  3,001,000     Far Eastone Telecom
Taiwan's Third Largest Mobile Operator
  $ 4,789,761    
  801,000     President Chain Store
Taiwan's Number One Convenience Chain
Store Operator
    4,640,753    
  214,800     St. Shine Optical
World's Leading Disposable Contact
Lens OEM
    3,263,470    
  166,500     Formosa International Hotels
Hotel, Food & Beverage Operation &
Hospitality Management Services
    3,158,365    
  580,000     China Steel Chemical
Sole Coal Chemical Producer in Taiwan
    3,106,945    
  1,082,500     Everlight Electronics
LED Packager
    2,915,680    
  945,000     Taiwan Hon Chuan
Beverage Packaging (Bottles, Caps & Labels) Manufacturer
    2,849,194    
  327,360     Sinyi Realty
Taiwanese Realty Company
    632,318    
      32,078,775    
    India – 2.4%  
  1,188,100     Jain Irrigation Systems
Agricultural Micro-irrigation Systems &
Food Processing
    4,542,724    
  1,093,900     Mundra Port & Special Economic Zone
Indian West Coast Shipping Port
    3,969,294    
  43,900     Asian Paints
India's Largest Paint Company
    3,109,472    
  4,020,100     REI Agro
Basmati Rice Processing
    2,293,550    
  1,584,000     Manappuram General Finance
Short-term Lending Collateralized by Household Gold
    1,997,099    
  1,430,800     S. Kumars Nationwide (a)
Textiles, Clothing & Retail
    1,736,912    
  497,700     Infrastructure Development Finance (a)
Infrastructure Finance in India
    1,461,787    
  100,000     Shriram Transport Finance
Used Truck Finance
    1,383,575    
  50,207     United Breweries
India's Largest Brewer
    598,177    
      21,092,590    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
12



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    South Korea – 1.4%  
  166,400     Woongjin Coway
South Korean Household Appliance Rental Service Provider
  $ 5,934,569    
  21,200     NHN (a)
South Korea's Largest Online Search Engine
    3,758,481    
  17,700     MegaStudy
Education Service Provider
    2,381,042    
      12,074,092    
    Thailand – 0.3%  
  11,015,000     Home Product Center
Home Improvement Retailer
    2,939,723    
    Indonesia – 0.0%  
  986,500     Ace Indonesia
Home Improvement Retailer
    347,987    
        Total Asia     329,120,664    
    Other Countries – 16.3%  
    Canada – 5.8%  
  240,115     ShawCor
Oil & Gas Pipeline Products
    7,374,365    
  142,717     Ivanhoe Mines (a)     3,606,214    
  120,265     Ivanhoe Mines (a)(e)
Copper Mine Project in Mongolia
    3,042,705    
  184,549     CCL Industries
Leading Global Label Manufacturer
    6,345,217    
  309,100     Tahoe Resources (a)(c)
Silver Project in Guatemala
    5,711,195    
  81,206     Baytex (d)
Oil & Gas Producer in Canada
    4,438,986    
  78,442     AG Growth
Leading Manufacturer of Augers & Grain Handling Equipment
    3,725,070    
  85,000     Onex Capital
Private Equity Firm
    3,293,535    
  76,815     Black Diamond Group
Provides Accommodations/Equipment for
Oil Sands Exploitation
    2,508,863    
  72,500     Alliance Grain Traders
Global Leader in Pulse Processing & Distribution
    1,939,447    
  378,516     DeeThree Exploration (a)(c)     1,384,628    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  133,000     DeeThree Exploration (a)
Canadian Oil & Gas Producer
  $ 496,449    
  847,500     Southern Arc Minerals (a)(c)
Gold & Copper Exploration in Indonesia
    1,489,814    
  318,277     Horizon North Logistics
Provides Diversified Oil Service Offering in Northern Canada
    1,478,439    
  187,600     Guyana Goldfields (a)
Gold Mining Projects in Guyana
    1,332,428    
  228,671     Pan Orient (a)
Growth Oriented & Return Focused Asian Explorer
    1,270,855    
  4,000,000     Eacom Timber (a)(c)
Canadian Lumber Producer
    1,259,993    
  51,600     Crew Energy (a)
Canadian Oil & Gas Producer
    802,530    
  20,500     Celtic Exploration (a)
Canadian Oil & Gas Producer
    453,383    
      51,954,116    
    South Africa – 3.7%  
  150,400     Naspers
Media in Africa, China, Russia & Other Emerging Markets
    8,495,560    
  624,185     Mr. Price
South African Retailer of Apparel,
Household & Sporting Goods
    6,295,575    
  653,000     Adcock Ingram Holdings
Manufacturer of Pharmaceuticals & Medical Supplies
    5,737,338    
  2,492,085     Rand Merchant Insurance
Directly Sold Property & Casualty
Insurance; Holdings in Other Insurers
    4,551,635    
  707,200     Northam Platinum
Platinum Mining in South Africa
    4,441,833    
  1,283,740     Coronation Fund Managers
South African Fund Manager
    3,664,140    
      33,186,081    
    United States – 3.6%  
  136,401     Atwood Oceanics (a)
Offshore Drilling Contractor
    6,019,376    
  117,506     Alexion Pharmaceuticals (a)
Biotech Focused on Orphan Diseases
    5,526,307    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
13



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    United States – 3.6% (cont)  
  129,064     World Fuel Services
Global Fuel Broker
  $ 4,637,270    
  95,612     FMC Technologies (a)
Oil & Gas Wellhead Manufacturer
    4,282,462    
  131,000     BioMarin Pharmaceutical (a)
Biotech Focused on Orphan Diseases
    3,564,510    
  36,000     Oil States International (a)
Diversified North American Oil Service Provider
    2,876,760    
  56,215     Bristow
Largest Provider of Helicopter Services
to Offshore Oil & Gas Producers
    2,868,089    
  84,361     Textainer Group Holdings
Top International Container Leasor
    2,593,257    
      32,368,031    
    Australia – 1.7%  
  344,925     UGL
Engineering & Facilities Management
    5,154,709    
  63,085     Cochlear
Cochlear Implants
    4,882,629    
  839,742     SAI Global
Publishing, Certification & Compliance Services
    4,278,877    
  150,000     Seek
Online Job Listing & Education
    1,040,355    
      15,356,570    
    Israel – 0.8%  
  410,804     Israel Chemicals
Producer of Potash, Phosphates, Bromine
& Specialty Chemicals
    6,555,656    
    Senegal – 0.4%  
  10,000     Sonatel
Leading Telecoms Operator in Western Africa
    3,205,572    
    Kazakhstan – 0.3%  
  262,500     Halyk Savings Bank of
Kazakhstan – GDR (a)
Largest Retail Bank & Insurer in Kazakhstan
    2,349,375    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Egypt – 0.0%  
  34,328     Paints & Chemical Industries (Pachin)
Paints & Inks in Egypt
  $ 220,050    
        Total Other Countries     145,195,451    
    Latin America – 5.7%  
    Brazil – 4.2%  
  604,600     Localiza Rent A Car
Car Rental
    10,808,535    
  431,400     Mills Estruturas e Serviços de
Engenharia
Civil Engineering & Construction
    6,219,524    
  836,500     Suzano
Brazilian Pulp & Paper Producer
    6,051,379    
  185,800     Natura
Direct Retailer of Cosmetics
    4,643,066    
  489,800     MRV Engenharia
Brazilian Property Developer
    4,067,413    
  600,000     PDG Realty
Brazilian Property Developer
    3,379,361    
  154,000     Multiplus
Loyalty Program Operator in Brazil
    2,684,010    
      37,853,288    
    Mexico – 0.5%  
  83,000     Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste – ADR
Mexican Airport Operator
    4,892,020    
    Argentina – 0.4%  
  1,204,545     Union Agriculture Group (a)(c)
Farmland Operator in Uruguay
    2,649,999    
  845,000     Madalena Ventures (a)(c)
Oil & Gas Exploration in Argentina
    489,416    
      3,139,415    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
14



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of Shares
or Principal Amount
      Value  
    Chile – 0.3%  
  45,889     Sociedad Quimica y Minera
de Chile – ADR
Producer of Specialty Fertilizers, Lithium & Iodine
  $ 2,969,936    
    Colombia – 0.3%  
  1,227,000     Canacol Energy (a)
Oil Producer in South America
    1,348,561    
  3,074,000     Gulf United (a)(c)
Prospecting for Oil Alongside Large
Producers in Colombia
    903,756    
      2,252,317    
        Total Latin America     51,106,976    
Total Equities
(Cost: $554,121,465) – 97.7%
    872,904,671    
Securities Lending Collateral – 0.8%      
  7,119,977     Dreyfus Government Cash
Management Fund (h)
(7 day yield of 0.00%)
    7,119,977    
Total Securities Lending Collateral
(Cost: $7,119,977)
    7,119,977    
Short-Term Obligation – 1.2%      
    Repurchase Agreement – 1.2%  
$ 10,966,000     Repurchase Agreement with Fixed
Income Clearing Corp., dated 6/30/11,
due 7/01/11 at 0.01%,
collateralized by a U.S. Government
Agency obligation maturing 9/08/17,
market value $11,187,900
(repurchase proceeds $10,966,003)
    10,966,000    
Total Short-Term Obligation
(Cost: $10,966,000)
    10,966,000    

 

        Value  
Total Investments
(Cost: $572,207,442) – 99.7% (f)(g)
  $ 890,990,648    
Obligation to Return Collateral for Securities
Loaned – (0.8)%
    (7,119,977 )  
Cash and Other Assets Less Liabilities – 1.1%     9,392,546    
Total Net Assets – 100.0%   $ 893,263,217    

 

  ADR = American Depositary Receipts

  GDR = Global Depositary Receipts

Notes to Statement of Investments:

(a)  Non-income producing security.

(b)  An affiliated person of the Fund may include any company in which the Fund owns five percent or more of its outstanding voting shares. Holdings and transactions in this affiliated company during the six months ended June 30, 2011, are as follows:




Affiliate
  Balance
of Shares
Held at
12/31/10
  Purchases/
Additions
  Sales/
Reductions
  Balance of
Shares
Held at
6/30/11
  Value   Dividend  
Charles
Taylor
    2,250,000                   2,250,000     $ 5,470,876     $ 163,395    

 

  The aggregate cost and value of this company at June 30, 2011, was $9,152,033 and $5,470,876, respectively. Investments in the affiliated company represented 0.61% of the total net assets at June 30, 2011.

(c)  Denotes a restricted security, which is subject to restrictions on resale under federal securities laws. These securities are valued at a fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. At June 30, 2011, the market value of these securities amounted to $17,810,618 which represented 1.99% of total net assets.

  Additional information on these securities is as follows:


Security
  Acquisition
Dates
  Shares  
Cost
  Value  
Tahoe Resources   5/28/10     309,100     $ 1,765,109     $ 5,711,195    
Mail.ru – GDR   11/05/10-
12/31/10
    109,900       3,640,848       3,650,878    
Union Agriculture
Group
  12/08/10     1,204,545       2,649,999       2,649,999    
Southern Arc
Minerals
  2/16/11     847,500       1,374,835       1,489,814    
DeeThree Exploration   9/07/10-
3/08/11
    378,516       1,283,408       1,384,628    
Eacom Timber   3/17/10     4,000,000       1,980,198       1,259,993    
Gulf United   2/11/11     3,074,000       922,200       903,756    
Madalena Ventures   10/21/10     845,000       535,436       489,416    
Sterling Resources   12/02/10     161,600       482,244       270,939    
            $ 14,634,277     $ 17,810,618    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
15



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

(d)  All or a portion of this security was on loan at June 30, 2011. The total market value of securities on loan at June 30, 2011 was $6,903,463.

(e)  Security is traded on a U.S. exchange.

(f)  At June 30, 2011, for federal income tax purposes cost of investments was $572,207,442 and net unrealized appreciation was $318,783,206 consisting of gross unrealized appreciation of $342,958,018 and gross unrealized depreciation of $24,174,812.

(g)  On June 30, 2011, the Fund's total investments were denominated in currencies as follows:

Currency   Value   Percentage
of Net Assets
 
Euro   $ 185,471,563       20.8    
Japanese Yen     144,811,791       16.2    
U.S. Dollar     91,713,218       10.3    
British Pound     72,273,264       8.1    
Hong Kong Dollar     52,351,338       5.9    
Canadian Dollar     51,428,188       5.7    
Other currencies less than
5% of total net assets
    285,821,309       31.9    
Cash and other assets
less liabilities
    9,392,546       1.1    
    $ 893,263,217       100.0    

 

(h)  Investment made with cash collateral received from security lending activity.

  At June 30, 2011, the Fund had entered into the following forward foreign currency exchange contracts:

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk  
Forward
Foreign
Currency
Exchange
Contracts
to Buy
  Forward
Foreign
Currency
Exchange
Contracts
to Sell
  Principal
Amount in
Foreign
Currency
  Principal
Amount in
U.S. Dollar
  Settlement
Date
  Unrealized
Appreciation
 
AUD     USD       5,756,555     $ 6,000,000     7/15/11   $ 166,377    
AUD     USD       5,710,261       6,000,000     8/15/11     92,884    
AUD     USD       5,563,072       5,880,000     9/15/11     32,816    
CAD     USD       339,143       350,000     7/15/11     1,556    
CAD     USD       5,815,860       6,000,000     8/15/11     24,067    
CAD     USD       339,399       350,000     8/15/11     1,549    
CAD     USD       6,162,421       6,350,000     9/15/11     28,127    
EUR     USD       634,393       900,000     7/15/11     19,708    
JPY     USD       108,305,600       1,300,000     7/15/11     45,393    
JPY     USD       32,292,400       400,000     8/15/11     1,206    
                $ 33,530,000           $ 413,683    
Forward
Foreign
Currency
Exchange
Contracts
to Buy
  Forward
Foreign
Currency
Exchange
Contracts
to Sell
  Principal
Amount in
Foreign
Currency
  Principal
Amount in
U.S. Dollar
  Settlement
Date
  Unrealized
Depreciation
 
USD     AUD       112,637     $ 120,000     7/15/11   $ (656 )  
USD     AUD       113,082       120,000     8/15/11     (659 )  
CAD     USD       5,779,140       6,000,000     7/15/11     (9,341 )  
USD     EUR       9,201,541       13,300,000     7/15/11     (39,900 )  
USD     EUR       504,914       730,000     7/15/11     (1,998 )  
USD     EUR       8,749,215       12,400,000     8/15/11     (273,151 )  
USD     EUR       505,397       730,000     8/15/11     (2,062 )  
USD     EUR       9,099,036       13,130,000     9/15/11     (38,252 )  
USD     JPY       72,672,300       900,000     7/15/11     (2,749 )  
JPY     USD       40,219,500       500,000     7/15/11     (386 )  
JPY     USD       40,213,500       500,000     8/15/11     (381 )  
JPY     USD       72,372,600       900,000     9/15/11     (662 )  
                $ 49,330,000           $ (370,197 )  

 

  The counterparty for all forward foreign currency exchange contracts is State Street Bank and Trust Company.

  AUD = Australian Dollar

  CAD = Canadian Dollar

  EUR = Euro

  JPY = Japanese Yen

  USD = United States Dollar

  Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments, following the input prioritization hierarchy established by GAAP. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

  Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

  Level 2 – prices determined using other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others)

  Level 3 – prices determined using significant unobservable inputs where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable or less reliable (including management's own assumptions about the factors market participants would use in pricing an investment)

  The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

  Examples of the types of securities in which the Fund would typically invest and how they are classified within this hierarchy are as follows. Typical Level 1 securities include exchange traded domestic equities, mutual funds whose NAVs are published each day and exchange traded foreign equities that are not statistically fair valued. Typical Level 2 securities include exchange traded foreign equities that are statistically fair valued, forward foreign currency exchange contracts and short-term investments valued at amortized cost. Additionally, securities fair valued by the Valuation Committee of the Fund's Board of Trustees that rely on significant observable inputs are also included in Level 2. Typical Level 3 securities include any security fair valued by the Valuation Committee that relies on significant unobservable inputs.

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
16



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

The following table summarizes the inputs used, as of June 30, 2011, in valuing the Fund's assets:

Investment Type   Other
Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total  
Equities  
Europe   $ 8,933,531     $ 338,548,049     $     $ 347,481,580    
Asia     23,045,725       306,074,939             329,120,664    
Other Countries     74,476,517       70,718,934             145,195,451    
Latin America     47,063,805       1,393,172       2,649,999       51,106,976    
Total Equities     153,519,578       716,735,094       2,649,999       872,904,671    
Total Securities
Lending Collateral
    7,119,977                   7,119,977    
Total Short-Term
Obligation
          10,966,000             10,966,000    
Total Investments     160,639,555       727,701,094       2,649,999       890,990,648    
Unrealized Appreciation
on Forward Foreign
Currency Exchange
Contracts
          413,683             413,683    
Unrealized Depreciation
on Forward Foreign
Currency Exchange
Contracts
          (370,197 )           (370,197 )  
Total   $ 160,639,555     $ 727,744,580     $ 2,649,999     $ 891,034,134    

 

  The Fund's assets assigned to the Level 2 input category are generally valued using a market approach, in which a security's value is determined through its correlation to prices and information from market transactions for similar or identical assets. Foreign equities are generally valued at the last sales price on the foreign exchange or market on which they trade. The Fund may use a systematic fair valuation model provided by an independent third party to value securities principally traded in foreign markets in order to adjust for possible stale pricing that may occur between the close of the foreign exchanges and the time for valuation. These models take into account available market data including intraday index, ADR, and ETF movements. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at the prevailing forward exchange rate of the underlying currencies. Securities acquired via private placement that have a holding period or an extended settlement period are valued at a discount to the same shares that are trading freely on the market. These discounts are determined by the adviser's experience with similar securities or situations. Factors may include, but are not limited to, trade volume, shares outstanding and stock price.

  Certain short-term obligations may be valued using amortized cost, an income approach which converts future cash flows to a present value based upon the discount or premium at purchase.

  The Fund's assets assigned to the Level 3 input category are valued at fair value as determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees. To determine fair value, management will utilize the valuation technique that they deem the most appropriate in the circumstances. Securities acquired via private placement but are not yet trading are valued using a market approach for which management has determined that the original transaction price is the best representation of fair value. The original cost may be adjusted for the market movement in an index, ETF or similar security during the period it does not trade.

The following table reconciles asset balances for the six months ending June 30, 2011, in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining value:

Investments
in Securities
  Balance as of
December 31,
2010
  Realized
Gain/(Loss)
  Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
  Purchases   Sales   Transfers
into
Level 3
  Transfers
out of
Level 3
  Balance
as of
June 30,
2011
 
Equities  
Asia   $ 23,569     $ (11,020,907 )   $ 10,997,338     $     $     $     $     $    
Latin America     2,649,999                                           2,649,999    
    $ 2,673,568     $ (11,020,907 )   $ 10,997,338     $     $     $     $     $ 2,649,999    

The information in the above reconciliation table represents fiscal year to date activity for any securities identified as using Level 3 inputs at either the beginning or the end of the current fiscal period.

The change in unrealized appreciation attributed to securities owned at June 30, 2011, which were valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) amounted to $0. This amount is included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets.

The following table shows transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy:

Transfers In   Transfers Out  
Level 1   Level 2   Level 1   Level 2  
$ 31,395,213     $ 3,137,251     $ 3,137,251     $ 31,395,213    

 

  Financial assets were transferred from Level 2 to Level 1 as they resumed trading during the period.

  Financial assets were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 as foreign exchange-traded financial assets were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
17



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger International

Portfolio Diversification (Unaudited) June 30, 2011

At June 30, 2011, the Fund's portfolio investments as a percentage of net assets was diversified as follows:

    Value   Percentage of
Net Assets
 
Industrial Goods & Services  
Other Industrial Services   $ 75,305,966       8.4    
Machinery     65,892,232       7.4    
Industrial Materials & Specialty Chemicals     64,887,513       7.3    
Electrical Components     18,211,358       2.0    
Construction     12,494,887       1.4    
Conglomerates     11,053,382       1.2    
Outsourcing Services     6,890,456       0.8    
Medical Equipment & Devices     3,997,635       0.4    
Industrial Distribution     2,744,634       0.3    
      261,478,063       29.2    
Consumer Goods & Services  
Retail     33,580,839       3.8    
Food & Beverage     26,461,463       3.0    
Casinos & Gaming     25,386,922       2.8    
Nondurables     21,161,268       2.4    
Other Consumer Services     18,282,132       2.0    
Apparel     16,904,280       1.9    
Travel     15,437,399       1.7    
Other Entertainment     7,071,892       0.8    
Educational Services     3,575,040       0.4    
Consumer Goods Distribution     2,654,231       0.3    
      170,515,466       19.1    
Energy & Minerals  
Mining     45,453,331       5.1    
Oil Services     35,539,161       4.0    
Oil & Gas Producers     16,835,058       1.9    
Oil Refining, Marketing & Distribution     12,453,387       1.4    
Agricultural Commodities     11,900,818       1.3    
      122,181,755       13.7    
Information  
Instrumentation     20,026,091       2.2    
Internet Related     19,476,737       2.2    
Computer Hardware & Related Equipment     16,004,047       1.8    
Business Software     13,409,714       1.5    
Financial Processors     11,383,831       1.3    
Telephone and Data Services     7,687,133       0.9    
Mobile Communications     7,348,852       0.8    
Computer Services     4,210,225       0.5    
Gaming Equipment & Services     4,199,447       0.5    
CATV     3,810,547       0.4    
Telecommunications Equipment     3,609,696       0.4    
Semiconductors & Related Equipment     2,915,680       0.3    
Advertising     1,563,956       0.2    
      115,645,956       13.0    

 

    Value   Percentage of
Net Assets
 
Other Industries  
Real Estate   $ 49,761,788       5.6    
Transportation     22,927,523       2.6    
Regulated Utilities     14,132,288       1.6    
Conglomerates     3,561,269       0.4    
      90,382,868       10.2    
Finance  
Banks     22,629,572       2.5    
Brokerage & Money Management     19,796,024       2.2    
Insurance     14,555,064       1.6    
Finance Companies     13,060,648       1.5    
      70,041,308       7.8    
Health Care  
Medical Equipment & Devices     14,541,536       1.6    
Pharmaceuticals     13,964,485       1.6    
Medical Supplies     5,724,452       0.6    
Health Care Services     4,864,272       0.5    
Biotechnology & Drug Delivery     3,564,510       0.4    
      42,659,255       4.7    
Total Equities     872,904,671       97.7    
Securities Lending Collateral     7,119,977       0.8    
Short-Term Obligation     10,966,000       1.2    
Total Investments     890,990,648       99.7    
Obligation to Return Collateral for
Securities Loaned
    (7,119,977 )     (0.8 )  
Cash and Other Assets
Less Liabilities
    9,392,546       1.1    
Net Assets   $ 893,263,217       100.0 %  

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
18




Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Statement of Assets and Liabilities
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Assets:  
Unaffiliated investments, at cost   $ 563,055,409    
Affiliated investments, at cost (See Note 4)     9,152,033    
Unaffiliated investments, at value (including securities
on loan of $6,903,463)
  $ 885,519,772    
Affiliated investments, at value (See Note 4)     5,470,876    
Cash     708    
Foreign currency (cost of $8,790,070)     9,078,205    
Unrealized appreciation on forward foreign
currency exchange contracts
    413,683    
Receivable for:  
Investments sold     2,719,086    
Fund shares sold     32,925    
Securities lending income     13,307    
Dividends     896,732    
Interest     3    
Foreign tax reclaims     289,503    
Expense reimbursement due from investment adviser     41,899    
Trustees' deferred compensation plan     115,579    
Other assets     2,855    
Total Assets     904,595,133    
Liabilities:  
Collateral on securities loaned     7,119,977    
Unrealized depreciation on forward foreign currency
exchange contracts
    370,197    
Payable for:  
Investments purchased     1,388,776    
Fund shares repurchased     1,034,538    
Investment advisory fee     645,034    
Administration fee     36,333    
Transfer agent fee     49    
Trustees' fees     61    
Custody fee     236,691    
Reports to shareholders     295,327    
Deferred foreign capital gains tax payable     30,445    
Chief compliance officer expenses     5,115    
Trustees' deferred compensation plan     115,579    
Other liabilities     53,794    
Total Liabilities     11,331,916    
Net Assets   $ 893,263,217    
Composition of Net Assets:  
Paid-in capital   $ 565,077,973    
Overdistributed net investment income     (23,770,439 )  
Accumulated net realized gain     32,860,685    
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:  
Investments     318,783,206    
Foreign currency translations     342,237    
Foreign capital gains tax     (30,445 )  
Net Assets   $ 893,263,217    
Fund Shares Outstanding     25,571,827    
Net asset value, offering price and redemption
price per share
  $ 34.93    

Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Investment Income:  
Dividends (net foreign taxes withheld of $1,021,567)   $ 11,706,266    
Dividends from affiliates     163,395    
Securities lending income, net     55,785    
Interest income     8,434    
Total Investment Income     11,933,880    
Expenses:  
Investment advisory fee     4,002,666    
Administration fee     226,144    
Transfer agent fee     248    
Trustees' fees     32,976    
Custody fee     507,445    
Reports to shareholders     188,247    
Chief compliance officer expenses (See Note 4)     19,670    
Other expenses (See Note 6)     88,096    
Total Expenses     5,065,492    
Advisory fee waiver (See Note 4)     (248,694 )  
Custody earnings credit     (6 )  
Net Expenses     4,816,792    
Net Investment Income     7,117,088    
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on
Investments, Foreign Currency and Forward
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts:
 
Net realized gain on:  
Investments     37,013,483    
Foreign currency transactions and forward
foreign currency exchange contracts
    226,938    
Net realized gain     37,240,421    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:  
Unaffiliated investments     (16,002,120 )  
Affiliated investments (See Note 4)     (369,899 )  
Foreign currency translations and forward
foreign currency exchange contracts
    (1,488,024 )  
Foreign capital gains tax     20,500    
Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation)
    (17,839,543 )  
Net Gain     19,400,878    
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations   $ 26,517,966    

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
19



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets:   (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 
Operations:  
Net investment income   $ 7,117,088     $ 12,003,320    
Net realized gain (loss) on:  
Unaffiliated investments     37,013,483       193,180,518    
Affiliated investments (See Note 4)           (3,212,313 )  
Foreign currency transactions and forward foreign currency exchange contracts     226,938       10,380,255    
Reimbursement from transaction costs (See Note 4)           335,670    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:  
Unaffiliated investments     (16,002,120 )     (51,331,757 )  
Affiliated investments (See Note 4)     (369,899 )     1,311,053    
Foreign currency translations and forward foreign currency exchange contracts     (1,488,024 )     961,314    
Foreign capital gains tax     20,500       1,892,799    
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations     26,517,966       165,520,859    
Distributions to Shareholders:  
From net investment income     (35,364,637 )     (20,131,055 )  
From net realized gains     (20,366,967 )        
Total Distributions to Shareholders     (55,731,604 )     (20,131,055 )  
Share Transactions:  
Subscriptions     11,968,639       68,202,656    
Distributions reinvested     55,731,604       20,131,055    
Redemptions (See Note 4)     (70,983,888 )     (750,391,189 )  
Net Decrease from Fund Share Transactions     (3,283,645 )     (662,057,478 )  
Total Decrease in Net Assets     (32,497,283 )     (516,667,674 )  
Net Assets:  
Beginning of period     925,760,500       1,442,428,174    
End of period   $ 893,263,217     $ 925,760,500    
Undistributed/(overdistributed) net investment income at end of period   $ (23,770,439 )   $ 4,477,110    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
20




Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Financial Highlights

    (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Year Ended December 31,  
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007   2006  
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period   $ 36.16     $ 29.68     $ 20.69     $ 44.04     $ 41.77     $ 30.63    
Income from Investment Operations:  
Net investment income (a)     0.28       0.35       0.30       0.52       0.37       0.29    
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments,
foreign currency and foreign capital gains tax
    0.79       6.93       9.61       (18.37 )     5.80       11.04    
Total from Investment Operations     1.07       7.28       9.91       (17.85 )     6.17       11.33    
Less Distributions to Shareholders:  
From net investment income     (1.46 )     (0.80 )     (0.93 )     (0.34 )     (0.39 )     (0.19 )  
From net realized gains     (0.84 )                 (5.16 )     (3.51 )        
Total Distributions to Shareholders     (2.30 )     (0.80 )     (0.93 )     (5.50 )     (3.90 )     (0.19 )  
Increase from Regulatory Settlements                 0.01                      
Net Asset Value, End of Period   $ 34.93     $ 36.16     $ 29.68     $ 20.69     $ 44.04     $ 41.77    
Total Return (b)     2.96 %(c)(d)     24.92 %(d)     49.78 %     (45.60 )%     16.31 %     37.16 %  
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data:  
Net expenses before interest expense (e)     1.07 %(f)     1.04 %     1.05 %     1.02 %     0.99 %     1.01 %  
Interest expense                                   0.00 %(g)  
Net expenses (e)     1.07 %(f)     1.04 %     1.05 %     1.02 %     0.99 %     1.01 %  
Net investment income (e)     1.57 %(f)     1.12 %     1.23 %     1.67 %     0.87 %     0.81 %  
Waiver/Reimbursement     0.05 %(f)     0.03 %                          
Portfolio turnover rate     16 %(c)     32 %     37 %     36 %     35 %     41 %  
Net assets, end of period (000s)   $ 893,263     $ 925,761     $ 1,442,428     $ 972,860     $ 1,693,374     $ 1,480,123    

 

(a)  Net investment income per share was based upon the average shares outstanding during the period.

(b)  Total return at net asset value assuming all distributions reinvested.

(c)  Not annualized.

(d)  Had the investment adviser not waived a portion of expenses, total return would have been reduced.

(e)  The benefits derived from custody fees paid indirectly had an impact of less than 0.01%.

(f)  Annualized.

(g)  Rounds to less than 0.01%.

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
21




Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.  Nature of Operations

Wanger International (the Fund), is a series of Wanger Advisors Trust (the Trust), an open-end management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. The investment objective of the Fund is to seek long-term capital appreciation. The Fund is available only for allocation to certain life insurance company separate accounts established for the purpose of funding qualified and non-qualified variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies and may also be offered directly to certain types of pension plans and retirement arrangements.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Security valuation

Securities of the Fund are valued at market value or, if a market quotation for a security is not readily available or is deemed not to be reliable because of events or circumstances that have occurred between the market quotation and the time as of which the security is to be valued, the security is valued at its fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. A security traded on a securities exchange or in an over-the-counter market in which transaction prices are reported is valued at the last sales price at the time of valuation. A security traded principally on NASDAQ is valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds are valued at their closing net asset value as reported to NASDAQ. A security for which there is no reported sale on the valuation date is valued at the latest bid quotation. Short-term investments maturing in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. A security for which a market quotation is not readily available and any other assets are valued at their fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. The Trust has retained an independent statistical fair value pricing service that employs a systematic methodology to assist in the fair valuation process for securities principally traded in a foreign market in order to adjust for possible changes in value that may occur between the close of the foreign market and the time as of which the securities are to be valued. If a security is valued at a fair value, that value may be different from the last quoted market price for the security.

Repurchase agreements

The Fund may engage in repurchase agreement transactions. The Fund, through its custodian, receives delivery of underlying securities collateralizing each repurchase agreement. The counterparty is required to maintain collateral that is at all times at least equal to the repurchase price including interest. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, realization and/or retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings.

Foreign currency translations

Values of investments denominated in foreign currencies are converted into U.S. dollars using the New York spot market rate of exchange at the time of valuation. Purchases and sales of investments and dividend and interest income are translated into U.S. dollars using the spot market rate of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. The gain or loss resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates is included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss from investments, as appropriate.

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts

The Fund may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts in order to seek to minimize the risk from adverse changes in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies. A forward foreign currency exchange contract is a commitment to purchase or sell a foreign currency at a future date at a negotiated forward rate. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at the interpolated forward exchange rate of the underlying currencies and any market gain or loss, arising from the difference between the original value and the current value of such contract, is included as a component of unrealized gain/(loss) on the Statement of Operations. Open forward foreign currency exchange contracts, if any, are disclosed in the Notes to the Statement of Investments. As forward foreign currency exchange contracts are closed the resulting gain or loss, arising from the difference between the original value of the contract and the closing value of such contract, is included as a component of realized gain/(loss) on the Statement of Operations.

A forward foreign currency exchange contract would limit the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of a particular currency; however, it also would limit any potential gain that might result should the value of the currency increase instead of decrease. These contracts may involve market risk in excess of the unrealized gain or loss reflected on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. In addition, a Fund could be exposed to risks if counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts. The counterparty risk exposure is, therefore, closely monitored and contracts are only executed with high credit quality financial institutions.

The Fund may use forward contracts to buy or sell a foreign currency when the Adviser believes it has exposure to a foreign currency which may suffer or enjoy a movement against another foreign currency to which the Fund has exposure. The Fund will not attempt to hedge all of its foreign portfolio positions

For additional information on derivative instruments, please see Note 5.

Securities lending

The Fund may lend securities up to one-third of the value of its total assets to certain approved brokers, dealers and other financial institutions to earn additional income. The Fund retains the benefits of owning the securities, including receipt of dividends or interest generated by the security. The Fund also receives a fee for the loan. The Fund has the ability to recall the loans at any time and could do so in order to vote proxies or to sell the loaned securities. Each loan is collateralized by cash that exceeded the value of the securities on loan. The market value of the loaned securities is determined daily at the close of business of the Fund and any additional required collateral is delivered to each Fund on the next business day. The Fund has elected to invest the cash collateral in the Dreyfus Government Cash Management Fund and the income earned is paid to the Fund, net of any fees remitted to Goldman Sachs Agency Lending as the lending agent and borrower rebates. The Fund's adviser, Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (CWAM), does not retain any fees earned by the lending program. Generally, in the event of borrower default, the Fund has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. In the event the Fund is delayed or prevented from exercising its right to dispose of the collateral, there may be a potential loss to the Fund. Some of these losses may be indemnified by the lending agent. The Fund bears the risk of loss with respect to the investment of collateral.

The net lending income earned by the Fund as of June 30, 2011, is included in the Statement of Operations.

Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed) and dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, except that certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as soon as the information is available to the Fund. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes amortization of discounts on debt obligations when required for federal income tax purposes. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

Awards, if any, from class action litigation related to securities owned may be recorded as a reduction of cost of those securities. If the applicable securities are no longer owned, the proceeds are recorded as realized gains.

Restricted securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale at the


22



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements, continued (Unaudited)

issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Board of Trustees.

Fund share valuation

Fund shares are sold and redeemed on a daily basis at net asset value. Net asset value per share is determined daily as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) on each day the Exchange is open for trading by dividing the total value of the Fund's investments and other assets, less liabilities, by the number of Fund shares outstanding.

Custody fees/Credits

Custody fees are reduced based on the Fund's cash balances maintained with the custodian. The amount is disclosed as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.

Federal income taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code available to regulated investment companies and, in the manner provided therein, distributes substantially all its taxable income, as well as any net realized gain on sales of investments and foreign currency transactions reportable for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Fund paid no federal income taxes and no federal income tax provision was required.

Expenses

General expenses of the Trust are allocated to the Fund and the other series of the Trust based upon relative net assets or other expense allocation methodologies determined by the nature of the expense. Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged to the Fund.

Foreign capital gains taxes

Gains in certain countries may be subject to foreign taxes at the fund level, at rates ranging from 10%-15%. The Fund accrues for such foreign taxes on net realized and unrealized gains at the appropriate rate for each jurisdiction.

Distributions to shareholders

Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.

Indemnification

In the normal course of business, the Trust on behalf of the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and that provide general indemnities. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims against the Fund. Also under the Trust's organizational documents, the trustees and officers of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities that may arise out of their duties to the Trust. However based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss due to these warranties and indemnities to be remote.

3.  Federal Tax Information

The tax character of distributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows:

    December 31, 2010  
Distributions paid from:  
Ordinary Income*   $ 20,131,055    

 

* For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions, if any, are considered ordinary income distributions.

Capital loss carryforwards that were utilized by the Fund during the year ended December 31, 2010 were $162,166,735.

Management is required to determine whether a tax position of the Fund is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized by the Fund is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Management is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. However, management's conclusions may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, new tax laws, regulations, and administrative interpretations (including relevant court decisions). The Fund's federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

4.  Transactions With Affiliates

CWAM is a wholly owned subsidiary of Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (Columbia Management), which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (Ameriprise Financial). CWAM furnishes continuing investment supervision to the Fund and is responsible for the overall management of the Fund's business affairs.

CWAM receives a monthly advisory fee based on the Fund's average daily net assets at the following annual rates:

Average Daily Net Assets   Annual Fee Rate  
Up to $100 million     1.10 %  
$100 million to $250 million     0.95 %  
$250 million to $500 million     0.90 %  
$500 million to $1 billion     0.80 %  
$1 billion and over     0.72 %  

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the annualized effective investment advisory fee rate, net of fee waivers, was 0.83% of the Fund's average daily net assets. CWAM has contractually agreed to reimburse the Fund to the extent that investment advisory fees exceed an annual percentage of 0.83% of average daily net assets on an annualized basis, through April 30, 2012. The reimbursement to the Fund for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $248,694.

CWAM provides administrative services and receives an administration fee from the Fund at the following annual rates.

Wanger Advisors Trust
Average Daily Net Assets of the Trust
  Aggregate
Annual Fee Rate
 
Up to $4 billion     0.05 %  
$4 billion to $6 billion     0.04 %  
$6 billion to $8 billion     0.03 %  
$8 billion and over     0.02 %  

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the annualized effective administration fee rate was 0.05% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Columbia Management provides certain sub-administrative services to the Fund.

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. (CMID), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, serves as the Fund's distributor and principal underwriter.

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp. (CMIS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, provides shareholder services to the Fund and contracted with Boston Financial Data Services (BFDS) to serve as subtransfer agent. For its services, the Fund pays CMIS a monthly fee at the annual rate of $21.00 per open account. CMIS also receives reimbursement from the Fund for certain out-of-pocket expenses. The arrangement with BFDS has been continued by CMIS.


23



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements, continued (Unaudited)

Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are also officers of CWAM. The Trust makes no direct payments to its officers and trustees who are affiliated with CWAM.

The Board of Trustees has appointed a Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust in accordance with federal securities regulations. The Fund, along with other affiliated funds, pays its pro-rata share of the expenses associated with the Office of the Chief Compliance Officer. These expenses are disclosed separately as "Chief compliance officer expenses" in the Statement of Operations.

The Trust offers a deferred compensation plan for its independent trustees. Under that plan, a trustee may elect to defer all or a portion of his or her compensation. Amounts deferred are retained by the Trust and may represent an unfunded obligation of the Trust. The value of amounts deferred is determined by reference to the change in value of Class Z shares of one or more series of Columbia Acorn Trust or a money market fund as specified by the trustee. Benefits under the deferred compensation plan are payable when the trustee ceases to be a member of the Board of Trustees.

An affiliated person of the Fund may include any company in which the Fund owns five percent or more of its outstanding voting shares. On June 30, 2011, the Fund held five percent or more of the outstanding voting securities of one company. Details of investments in those affiliated companies are presented in the Notes to the Statement of Investments on page 15.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Fund engaged in purchase and sales transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common directors/trustees, and/or common officers. Those purchase and sale transactions complied with provisions of Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and were $41,231 and $622,834, respectively.

5.  Objectives and Strategies for Investing in Derivative Instruments

The Fund uses derivatives instruments including foreign forward currency exchange contracts in order to meet its investment objectives. The Fund employs strategies in differing combinations to permit it to increase, decrease or change the level of exposure to market risk factors. The achievement of any strategy involving derivatives depends on analysis of various risk factors, and if the strategies for the use of derivatives do not work as intended, the Fund may not achieve its investment objectives.

In pursuit of its investment objectives, the Fund is exposed to the following market risks:

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk: Foreign exchange rate risk relates to the change in the U.S. dollar value of a security held that is denominated in a foreign currency. The U.S. dollar value of a foreign-currency-denominated security will decrease as the dollar appreciates against the currency, while the U.S. dollar value will increase as the dollar depreciates against the currency.

The following provides more detailed information about the derivative type held by the Fund:

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts

  The Fund entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to shift its investment exposure from one currency to another.

  The Fund used forward foreign currency exchange contracts to shift its U.S. dollar exposure in order to achieve a representative weighted mix of major currencies relative to its benchmark and/or to recover an underweight country exposure in its portfolio relative to its benchmark.

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are agreements to exchange one currency for another at a future date at a specified price. These contracts are used to seek to minimize the exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations during the period between the trade and settlement dates of the contract. The Fund may utilize forward foreign currency exchange contracts in connection with the settlement of purchases and sales of securities. The Fund may also enter into these contracts to seek to reduce the exposure to adverse price movements in certain other foreign-currency-denominated assets. Contracts to buy are used to acquire exposure to foreign currencies, while contracts to sell are used to reduce the exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued daily at the current exchange rate of the underlying currency, resulting in unrealized gains (losses) which become realized at the time the forward foreign currency exchange contracts are closed or mature. Realized and unrealized gains (losses) arising from such transactions are included in net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions. The use of forward foreign currency exchange contracts does not eliminate fluctuations in the prices of the Fund's portfolio securities. While the maximum potential loss from such contracts is the aggregate face value in U.S. dollars at the time the contract was opened, exposure is typically limited to the change in value of the contract (in U.S. dollars) over the period it remains open. The Fund could also be exposed to risk that counterparties of the contracts may be unable to fulfill the terms of the contracts.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Fund entered into 87 forward foreign currency exchange contracts.

The following table is a summary of the value of the Fund's derivative instruments as of June 30, 2011.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

Asset   Liability  
Statement of Assets
and Liabilities
  Fair
Value
  Statement of Assets
and Liabilities
  Fair
Value
 
Unrealized appreciation
on forward foreign
currency exchange
contracts
  $ 413,683     Unrealized depreciation
on forward foreign
currency exchange
contracts
  $ 370,197    

 

The effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

Amount of Realized Gain or (Loss) and Change in Unrealized Appreciation or
(Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income

    Risk
Exposure
  Realized
Gain (Loss)
  Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
 
Forward Foreign Currency
Exchange Contracts
  Foreign
Exchange
Rate Risk
  $ 73,903
  $ (1,567,505
)  

 

6.  Borrowing Arrangements

The Trust participates in a $150 million credit facility, along with another Trust managed by CWAM, which was entered into to facilitate portfolio liquidity. Under the facility, interest is charged to each participating fund based on its borrowings at a rate per annum equal to the higher of Federal Funds Rate or Overnight LIBOR plus 1.25%. In addition, a commitment fee of 0.125% per annum of the unutilized line of credit is accrued and apportioned among the participating funds based on their relative net assets. The commitment fee is included in "Other expenses" in the Statement of Operations. No amounts were borrowed by the Fund under this facility during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Trust enters into this line of credit for one year durations. The Trust has secured the line of credit for the entire year of 2011.

7.  Fund Share Transactions

Proceeds and payments on Fund shares as shown in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets are in respect of the following numbers of shares:

    Six months ended
June 30, 2011
  Year ended
December 31, 2010
 
Shares sold     329,820       2,055,268    
Shares issued in reinvestment
of dividend distributions
    1,596,894       635,576    
Less shares redeemed     (1,955,881 )     (25,686,043 )  
Net decrease in shares outstanding     (29,167 )     (22,995,199 )  


24



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements, continued (Unaudited)

8.  Investment Transactions

The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales other than short-term obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $142,260,009 and $154,154,112, respectively.

9.  Information Regarding Pending and Settled Legal Proceedings

In June 2004, an action captioned John E. Gallus et al. v. American Express Financial Corp. and American Express Financial Advisors Inc. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege that they are investors in several American Express Company (now known as legacy RiverSource) mutual funds and they purport to bring the action derivatively on behalf of those funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The plaintiffs allege that fees allegedly paid to the defendants by the funds for investment advisory and administrative services are excessive. The plaintiffs seek remedies including restitution and rescission of investment advisory and distribution agreements. The plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (the District Court). In response to defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, the District Court dismissed one of plaintiffs' four claims and granted plaintiffs limited discovery. Defendants moved for summary judgment in April 2007. Summary judgment was granted in the defendants' favor on July 9, 2007. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (the Eighth Circuit) on August 8, 2007. On April 8, 2009, the Eighth Circuit reversed summary judgment and remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. On August 6, 2009, defendants filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court (the Supreme Court), asking the Supreme Court to stay the District Court proceedings while the Supreme Court considers and rules in a case captioned Jones v. Harris Associates, which involves issues of law similar to those presented in the Gallus case. On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jones v. Harris Associates, and on April 5, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuit's decision in the Gallus case and remanded the case to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On June 4, 2010, the Eighth Circuit remanded the Gallus case to the District Court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On December 9, 2010, the District Court reinstated its July 9, 2007 summary judgment order in favor of the defendants. On January 10, 2011, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eight Circuit. In response to the plaintiffs' opening appellate brief filed on March 18, 2011, the defendants filed a response brief on May 4, 2011 with the Eighth Circuit. The plaintiffs filed a reply brief on May 26, 2011.

In December 2005, without admitting or denying the allegations, American Express Financial Corporation (AEFC, which is now known as Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (Ameriprise Financial)), entered into settlement agreements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Minnesota Department of Commerce (MDOC) related to market timing activities. As a result, AEFC was censured and ordered to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and various Minnesota laws. AEFC agreed to pay disgorgement of $10 million and civil money penalties of $7 million. AEFC also agreed to retain an independent distribution consultant to assist in developing a plan for distribution of all disgorgement and civil penalties ordered by the SEC in accordance with various undertakings detailed at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/ia-2451.pdf. Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have cooperated with the SEC and the MDOC in these legal proceedings, and have made regular reports to the RiverSource, Seligman and Threadneedle funds' Boards of Directors/Trustees.

Ameriprise Financial and certain of its affiliates have historically been involved in a number of legal, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, including routine litigation, class actions, and governmental actions, concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of their business activities. Ameriprise Financial believes that the Funds are not currently the subject of, and that neither Ameriprise Financial nor any of its affiliates are the subject of, any pending legal, arbitration or regulatory proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds. Ameriprise Financial is required to make 10-Q, 10-K and, as necessary, 8-K filings with the SEC on legal and regulatory matters that relate to Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. Copies of these filings may be obtained by accessing the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

There can be no assurance that these matters, or the adverse publicity associated with them, will not result in increased fund redemptions, reduced sale of fund shares or other adverse consequences to the Funds. Further, although we believe proceedings are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds, these proceedings are subject to uncertainties and, as such, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other relief that could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of Ameriprise Financial.


25




Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

[Excerpt from:]

Wanger Advisors Trust

Management Fee Evaluation of the Senior Officer

Prepared Pursuant to the New York Attorney General's
Assurance of Discontinuance

May 2011


26



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Introduction

The New York Attorney General's Assurance of Discontinuance ("Order") entered into by Columbia Management Advisors, LLC ("CMA") and Columbia Management Distributors, Inc., ("CMDI") in February 2005, allows CMA to manage or advise a mutual fund only if the trustees of the fund appoint a "Senior Officer" to perform specified duties and responsibilities. Among these responsibilities is "managing the process by which proposed management fees (including but not limited to, advisory fees) to be charged the [funds] are negotiated so that they are negotiated in a manner which is at arms' length and reasonable and consistent with this Assurance of Discontinuance."

The Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust (collectively, the "Trusts") and each series thereof (the "Acorn funds," "WAT funds" or collectively, the "Funds") are overseen by the same Board of Trustees ("Board"). The Order provides that this Board must determine the reasonableness of proposed "management fees" by using either an annual competitive bidding process supervised by the Senior Officer or Independent Fee Consultant, or by obtaining "an annual independent written evaluation prepared by or under the direction of the Senior Officer or the Independent Fee Consultant."

"Management fees" are only part of the costs and expenses paid by mutual fund shareholders. Fund expenses can vary depending upon the class of shares held but usually include: (1) advisory fees to compensate analysts and portfolio managers for stock research and portfolio management, as well as the cost of operating a trading desk; (2) administrative expenses incurred to prepare registration statements and tax returns, calculate the funds' net asset values, maintain effective compliance procedures and perform recordkeeping services; (3) transfer agency costs for establishing accounts, accepting and disbursing funds, as well as overseeing trading in fund shares; (4) custodial expenses incurred to hold the securities purchased by the funds; and (5) distribution expenses, including commissions paid to brokers that sell the fund shares to investors. "Management fees" consist of (1) and (2), but not the other services.

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("CWAM"), is the adviser to the Funds, and at present is wholly owned by Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise"). The name Columbia Management or Columbia, is used to refer to the group of entities that manage or provide services to funds bearing the brand name "Columbia." These entities include Columbia Management Investment Advisers, ("CMIA"), the successor entity to CMA, Columbia Management Investment Services, Inc. ("CMIS") and Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. ("CMID"), the successor entity to CMDI. The Columbia asset management business, formerly owned by Bank of America Corporation ("Bank of America"), is now owned by Ameriprise.

The Change of Ownership

On September 29, 2009, Bank of America entered into a Purchase Agreement with Ameriprise providing for, among other things, the sale of CWAM to Ameriprise and the acquisition by Ameriprise of certain assets of Columbia. The sale closed on May 1, 2010. A new advisory agreement is required under these circumstances. In advance of that closing, Columbia and Ameriprise proposed that the Trusts continue, in substance, the then existing advisory agreement governing portfolio management, and the administration services agreement governing certain administration and clerical services. They proposed no material changes to these agreements, no change in services and no changes in fee levels, only those changes necessary to effect the change of ownership. The Board of Trustees approved the new advisory agreements, and on May 27, 2010, shareholders voted to approve them too. The investment management team responsible for the Funds remained with CWAM following the Ameriprise acquisition.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") effectively bars an increase in management fees for two years following a change in ownership of a fund's advisor (other than for bona fide additional investment advisory services); the purpose of this prohibition is to preclude management from financing the purchase through increased advisory fees. Ameriprise has represented to the Board that it intends to comply with these restrictions, and does not seek increased management fees at this time. Rather, Ameriprise seeks only to renew the advisory and related agreements on their existing terms.

Requirements of the Order

The Order applies to any successor to substantially all the assets of CMDI and CMA. Thus, it applies to CMIA and CMID as successors to CMA and CMDI. Under the Order, a fee evaluation must precede the execution of new or the extension of existing advisory and administration services agreements. The existing agreements continue in effect until July 31, 2011.

In conformity with the terms of the Order and past evaluations, this Evaluation addresses only the advisory and administration contracts, and does not extend to the Funds' underwriting and transfer agency agreements.

According to the Order, the Senior Officer's evaluation must consider a number of factors. These factors parallel the standard set forth in the Gartenberg case. They are following:

(1)  Management fees (including components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of CWAM for like services;

(2)  Management fees (including any components thereof) charged by other mutual fund companies for like services;

(3)  Costs to CWAM and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit;

(4)  Profit margins of CWAM and its affiliates from supplying such services;

(5)  Possible economies of scale as the Funds grow larger; and

(6)  The nature and quality of CWAM's services, including the performance of each Fund.

In 2004, the Boards of the two Trusts, then separate groups, each appointed me Senior Officer under the Order. They also determined not to pursue a competitive bidding process and instead, charged me with the responsibility of evaluating the Funds' proposed advisory and administration fee contracts with CWAM in conformity with the requirements of the Order. In discharging their responsibilities, the independent Trustees have also consulted independent, outside counsel. The Board has asked that I prepare this Evaluation.


27



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Scope of this Evaluation

This Evaluation is qualified in two respects. First, assessing such factors as cost of service, profitability, projected economies of scale, and expected quality of service, involves, at present, a significant element of uncertainty. Ameriprise and Columbia hope to effect cost savings by virtue of the increased scale of their operations. The integration of the two organizations is not, however, complete at this time, so the anticipated benefits are impossible to quantify now and hence cannot effectively be weighed in assessing the reasonableness of the proposed management fee. Profitability data is, to some extent, based on pro forma financial statements. At the same time, Ameriprise and Columbia have assured the Board that the Funds will not suffer diminished services as a result of the combination, nor do they propose to change the fee levels set forth in the existing advisory and administration services agreements. The upshot is that the Fund shareholders will, if the advisory agreements are renewed and asset levels do not decrease, pay no more than they do now, but it is too early to determine whether the change in ownership will result in material changes in the calculus of assessing the fairness of the management fee. Of necessity this must be left to future evaluations.

A second consideration concerns the new funds recently approved by the Board of Trustees. Earlier this year, CWAM and Ameriprise proposed two new Acorn funds: Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund ("Acorn Emerging Markets"), and Columbia Acorn European Fund ("Acorn European"). I issued a fee evaluation in February 2011 addressing the management fees proposed for those new funds. In March 2011, the Board approved amendments to the advisory and other agreements necessary to launch the new funds. They have not yet, however, been offered. Consequently, there is nothing to add here to the evaluation done in February, so this Evaluation does not address those funds.

Process and Independence

The objectives of the Order are to ensure the independent evaluation of the management fees paid by the Funds as well as to insure that all relevant factors are considered. In my view, this contract process has been conducted at arms-length and with independence in gathering, considering and evaluating all relevant data. At the outset of the process, the Trustees sought and obtained from Ameriprise and Columbia a comprehensive compilation of data regarding Fund performance and expenses, adviser profitability, and other information. The Trustees, acting through their Contract Committee evaluated this information thoroughly, and met often to discuss it. Performance and expense data was obtained from both Morningstar and Lipper, the leading consultants in this area. The rankings prepared by Morningstar and Lipper were independent and prepared in conformity with the methodologies employed by those organizations. Counsel for the Funds and the Independent Trustees considered, as did I, the terms and conditions of the proposed contracts.

My evaluation of the advisory contracts was shaped, as it has been in the past, by my experience as Chief Compliance Officer of the Trusts ("CCO"). As CCO, I report solely to the Board and have no reporting obligation to, or employment relationship with, Ameriprise or its affiliates. I have commented on compliance matters in evaluating the quality of service provided by CWAM.

This Report, its supporting materials and the data contained in other materials submitted to the Contract Committee, in my view, provide a thorough factual basis upon which the Board, in consultation with independent counsel as it deems appropriate, may conduct management fee negotiations that are in the best interests of the Funds' shareholders.

The Fee Reductions Mandated under the Order

Under the terms of the Order, Columbia agreed to secure certain management fee reductions for the mutual funds advised by its affiliate investment advisers. In some instances, breakpoints were also established. Although neither CWAM nor the Trusts was a party to the Order, CWAM offered and the Board accepted certain advisory fee reductions during 2005. By the terms of the Order, these fees could not be increased before November 30, 2009, and, in fact, have not been increased since. As a result of the Ameriprise acquisition, the Investment Company Act precludes any increases in management fees before May 2012 (other than for bona fide additional investment advisory services). Therefore, CWAM and Ameriprise propose the continuation of the contracts and management fees as they now exist; no increases in these fees are sought, and no reductions offered.

Conclusions

My review of the data and other material above leads to the following conclusions with respect to the factors identified in the Order.

A.  Fund Performance

The Domestic Funds: The Acorn Fund has achieved good performance over the past five years, and excellent results over longer periods. Acorn Select and Wanger Select have enjoyed better than average investment returns over the past five years, but have suffered reversals in more recent periods. Both funds expose investors to greater relative risk than the other domestic Funds. Acorn USA and its parallel, Wanger USA are the weakest performers, falling behind their benchmark and peer medians over one and five years. Thermostat is unique and therefore difficult to assess, but has outperformed its benchmark and now enjoys strong rankings from Morningstar.

The International Funds: The international Funds have delivered excellent results over the past five years, and done so while exposing investors to less risk than competing funds. They have also outperformed their benchmarks during this period, but recent results have been more restrained. The international Funds enjoy positive "alpha," confirming the value of their portfolio managers.

B.  Management Fees Relative to Peers

There is significant variance in management fee rankings across the Funds. Acorn International is the only fund that was ranked in the top quartile by both Morningstar and Lipper. The other Acorn funds tend to fall around the medians identified by one or the other service. The WAT funds are uniformly more expensive than their peers.


28



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

C.  Management Fees Relative to Institutional Account and Other Mutual Fund Accounts

CWAM's focus is on its mutual funds. The few institutional accounts it does manage vary in rate structures. Some pay advisory fees commensurate with or higher than the Acorn and WAT funds. In a few instances, however, institutional accounts pay lower advisory fees than do the Acorn funds. One such institutional account is significant in size and has been under CWAM's management for over 33 years. Furthermore, CWAM performs sub-advisory services for mutual funds managed by Ameriprise affiliates, CWAM's parent organization, at rates that are lower than those paid by the parallel Acorn funds, though sub-advisory services usually differ from those necessary for the full support of a mutual fund.

D.  Administrative Services

The Acorn and WAT funds' administrative fees are within the range of fees charged by competitors, but these rankings suffer from a lack of uniformity in the scope of services encompassed by the fee. CWAM provides excellent administrative support for all the Funds.

E.  Costs and Benefits to CWAM and its Affiliates

CWAM's direct costs do not appear excessive. Overhead and indirect costs allocated to CWAM by its parent organization, however, are significant and have varied considerably over the years. CWAM's affiliates report operating losses and although the allocations leading to these losses may bear closer scrutiny, Ameriprise affiliates do not appear to enjoy excessive "fall out" benefits from CWAM's advisory agreement with the Funds. CWAM continues, however, to enjoy substantial benefits from the use of "soft dollar" payments for research.

F.  Profitability

CWAM's profit margins may be in the upper range of its competitors, but peer profitability is difficult to assess given differences in products, operations and other factors. Furthermore, there is limited public information available with regard to the profitability of investment advisers.

G.  Economies of Scale

Economies of scale do exist at CWAM, and the Board has instituted breakpoints that reduce fess as assets increase. Though asset levels have recovered from recent lows, sustained asset growth will be required to trigger additional fee reductions under the current schedule.

H.  Nature and Quality of Service

This category includes a variety of considerations that are difficult to quantify, yet can have a significant bearing on the performance of the Acorn and WAT funds. Several areas merit comment: (1) CWAM has maintained its investment management capacity and an experienced staff; and (2) CWAM has a reasonably designed compliance program that protects shareholders.

I.  Process

In my opinion, the process of negotiating an advisory contract for the Funds has been conducted thoroughly and at arms' length. The Board's Contract Committee has sought and obtained extensive data bearing on the reasonableness of the management fees proposed by CWAM. The Trustees have sufficient information to evaluate management's proposal, and negotiate contract terms that are in the best interests of fund shareholders.

Recommendation

According to Morningstar, Acorn USA and Wanger USA have delivered performance below peer medians for the past one and five years, while imposing management fees that exceed them. Management has fashioned various initiatives to improve performance, and the Trustees should continue to monitor both Funds closely to assess the impact of those initiatives.


29



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement

Wanger Advisors Trust (the "Trust") has an investment advisory agreement (the "Advisory Agreement") with Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("CWAM") under which CWAM manages the Wanger Funds (the "Funds"). More than 75% of the trustees of the Trust (the "Trustees") are comprised of persons who have no direct or indirect interest in the Advisory Agreement and are not "interested persons" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act")) of the Trust (the "Independent Trustees"). The Trustees oversee the management of each Fund and, as required by law, determine at least annually whether to continue the Advisory Agreement for each Fund.

The Contract Committee of the Board (the "Committee"), which is comprised solely of Independent Trustees, makes recommendations to the Board regarding any proposed continuation of the Advisory Agreement. After the Committee has made its recommendations, the full Board determines whether to approve continuation of the Advisory Agreement. The Board also considers matters bearing on the Advisory Agreement at its various meetings throughout the year, meets at least quarterly with CWAM's portfolio managers and receives monthly reports from CWAM on the performance of the Funds.

In connection with their most recent consideration of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund, the Committee and all Trustees received and reviewed a substantial amount of information provided by CWAM, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ("Columbia Management") and Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise"), in response to written requests from the Independent Trustees and their independent legal counsel. Throughout the process, the Trustees had numerous opportunities to ask questions of and request additional materials from CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise.

During each meeting at which the Committee or the Independent Trustees considered the Advisory Agreement, they met in executive session with their independent legal counsel. The Committee also met with representatives of CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise on several occasions. In all, the Committee convened formally on five separate occasions to consider the continuation of the Advisory Agreement. The Board and/or some or all of the Independent Trustees met on other occasions to receive the Committee's status reports, receive presentations from CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise representatives, and to discuss outstanding issues. In addition, the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board, also comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees, reviewed the performance of the Funds and presented its findings to the Board and the Committee throughout the year. The Compliance Committee also provided information to the Committee with respect to relevant matters.

The Trustees reviewed the Advisory Agreement, as well as certain information obtained through CWAM's, Columbia Management's and Ameriprise's responses to independent legal counsel's questionnaires. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the Management Fee Evaluation dated May 2011 (the "Fee Evaluation") prepared by the Trust's chief compliance officer, senior vice president and general counsel, who also serves as the Trust's "Senior Officer," as contemplated by the Assurance of Discontinuance dated February 9, 2005 among former affiliates of CWAM and the Office of the New York Attorney General. A summary of the Fee Evaluation is included in this report.

The materials reviewed by the Committee and the Trustees included, among other items, (i) information on the investment performance of each Fund and of independently selected peer groups of funds and of the Funds' performance benchmarks over various time periods, (ii) information on each Fund's advisory fees and other expenses, including information comparing the Fund's fees and expenses to those of peer groups of funds and information about any applicable expense limitations and fee breakpoints, (iii) data on sales and redemptions of Fund shares, and (iv) information on the profitability to CWAM and Ameriprise, as well as potential "fall-out" or ancillary benefits that CWAM and its affiliates may receive as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Trustees also considered other information such as (i) CWAM's financial condition, (ii) each Fund's investment objective and strategy, (iii) the size, education and experience of CWAM's investment staff and its use of technology, external research and trading cost measurement tools, (iv) the portfolio manager compensation framework, (v) the allocation of the Funds' brokerage, and the use of "soft" commission dollars to pay for research products and services, and (vi) the resources devoted to, and the record of compliance with, the Funds' investment policies and restrictions, policies on personal securities transactions and other compliance policies.

At a meeting held on June 8, 2011, upon recommendations of the Committee, the Board of Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreement.

In considering the continuation of the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees' determination to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement are discussed below.

Nature, quality and extent of services. The Trustees reviewed the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates to the Funds under the Advisory Agreement, taking into account the investment objective and strategy of each Fund and knowledge gained from meetings with management, which were held on at least a quarterly basis. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the available resources and key personnel of CWAM and its affiliates, especially those providing investment management services to the Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Funds by CWAM and its affiliates, including: managing the execution of portfolio transactions and selecting broker-dealers for those transactions; monitoring adherence to the Funds' investment restrictions; producing shareholder reports; providing support services for the Board and committees of the Board; communicating with shareholders; serving as the Funds' administrator; and overseeing the activities of the Funds' other service providers, including monitoring for compliance with various policies and procedures as well as applicable securities laws and regulations.

The Trustees concluded that the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates to each Fund under the Advisory Agreement were appropriate for the Funds and that the Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services by CWAM. They also concluded that CWAM currently had sufficient personnel, with appropriate education and experience, to serve the Funds effectively, and that the firm had demonstrated its continuing ability to attract and retain well-qualified personnel. In addition, they took note of the quality of CWAM's compliance record.

Performance of the Funds. The Trustees received and considered detailed performance information at various meetings of the Board, the Committee and the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board throughout the year. They reviewed information comparing each Fund's performance with that of its benchmark(s) and with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups as identified by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper") and Morningstar, Inc. ("Morningstar"). The Trustees evaluated the performance of the Funds over various time periods, including over the one-, three- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010. The Trustees also considered peer performance rankings based on a rolling five-year period.

The Trustees noted that the international Funds have delivered excellent results over the past five years, and have done so while exposing investors to less risk than competing funds, according to Morningstar. They considered that the domestic Funds have had mixed results. Wanger Select had better than average results measured against its peers over the five-year period but underperformed over the one- and three-year periods ending December 31, 2010. Wanger Select outperformed its benchmark for the five-year period but underperformed over the three-year period and equaled its benchmark for the one-year period ending December 31, 2010. Wanger USA outperformed its peer group medians over the three-year period but underperformed its peer group medians over the one- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010 and also underperformed its benchmark over the same one-, three- and five-year periods. The Trustees noted that the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board concluded that Fund performance was generally satisfactory, except that Wanger USA's performance had slipped below the Lipper and Morningstar medians during the past year. The Trustees considered that CWAM had taken and was taking a number of corrective steps with respect to Wanger USA's underperformance and that the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board was monitoring the Fund's performance.


30



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement

The Trustees concluded that, although past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, the strong overall longer-term performance record of the Funds was an important factor in their evaluation of the quality of services provided by CWAM under the Advisory Agreement for each Fund.

Costs of Services and Profits Realized by CWAM. At various Committee and Board meetings, the Trustees examined detailed information on the fees and expenses of each Fund in comparison to information for comparable funds provided by Lipper and Morningstar. The Trustees reviewed data from Lipper and Morningstar and noted that all Funds other than Wanger International Select had lower total net operating expenses than their respective Lipper peer group medians and only Wanger USA had total net operating expenses above its Morningstar peer group median. As noted in the Fee Evaluation, the actual advisory fees paid by Wanger Select and Wanger USA were higher than the median advisory fee of the Funds' Morningstar peer groups and the actual advisory fee paid by each Fund was higher than the median advisory fee of each Fund's Lipper peer group. The Trustees reviewed the observations in the Fee Evaluation and noted that the Funds are assessed by Morningstar and Lipper in relation to peers selected only from the variable annuity universe.

The Trustees also considered that Ameriprise represented and agreed that advisory fees would not be raised for the two years following the close of its acquisition of CWAM (May 1, 2010) pursuant to Section 15(f) of the 1940 Act.

The Trustees also reviewed the advisory fee rates charged by CWAM for managing other investment companies (including the Columbia Acorn Funds), sub-advised funds and other institutional separate accounts, as detailed in the Fee Evaluation. The Trustees noted that the Funds' advisory fees were generally comparable to the Columbia Acorn Funds' advisory fees at the same asset levels. The Trustees also examined CWAM's institutional separate account fees for various investment strategies; in some cases those fees were higher than the advisory fees charged to the Funds, and in a few instances the fees were lower. The Trustees noted that CWAM performs significant additional services for the Funds that it does not provide to sub-advised funds or non-mutual fund clients, including administrative services, oversight of the Funds' other service providers, Trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in servicing the Funds, CWAM assumes many legal risks that it does not assume in servicing many of its non-fund clients.

The Trustees concluded that the rates of advisory fees payable to CWAM were reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services to be provided. The Trustees also concluded that the Funds' overall expense ratios were reasonable, considering the quality of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates and the investment performance of the Funds.

The Trustees reviewed the analysis of the historic profitability of CWAM in serving as each Fund's investment adviser and of CWAM and its affiliates in their relationships with each Fund. The Committee and Trustees met on several occasions with representatives from Ameriprise to discuss its methodologies for calculating profitability and allocating costs. They considered that Ameriprise calculated profitability and allocated costs on a contract-by-contract and fund-by-fund basis. The Trustees also considered the methodology used by CWAM and Ameriprise in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers and the competitive market for investment management talent. The Trustees were also provided with profitability information from Lipper and Strategic Insight, which compared CWAM's profitability to other similar investment advisers in the mutual fund industry. The Trustees concluded that CWAM's and its affiliates' profits were within a reasonable range of those of competitors with similar business models. The Trustees discussed, however, that profitability comparisons among fund managers may not always be meaningful due to the lack of consistency in data, small number of publicly-owned managers, and the fact that profitability of any investment manager is affected by numerous factors, including its particular organizational structure, the types of funds and other accounts managed, other lines of business, expense allocation methodology, capital structure and cost of capital.

Economies of Scale. At various Committee and Board meetings and other informal meetings, the Trustees considered information about the extent to which CWAM realizes economies of scale in connection with an increase in Fund assets. The Trustees also discussed the potential for Fund sales growth. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedule for each Fund includes breakpoints in the rate of fees at various asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee structure of each Fund was reflective of a sharing between CWAM and the Funds of economies of scale.

Other Benefits to CWAM. The Trustees also reviewed benefits that accrue to CWAM and its affiliates from their relationships with the Funds, as outlined in the Fee Evaluation. They noted that the Funds' transfer agency services are performed by Columbia Management Investment Services Corp., an affiliate of Ameriprise, which receives compensation from the Funds for its services provided. They considered that an affiliate of Ameriprise, Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. ("CMID"), serves as the Funds' distributor under a distribution agreement and receives no fees for its services. In addition, Columbia Management provides sub-administration services to the Funds. The Committee received information regarding the profitability of each Fund agreement with CWAM affiliates. The Committee and the Board also reviewed information about and discussed the capabilities of each affiliated entity in performing its duties.

The Trustees considered other ways that the Funds and CWAM may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other. For example, the Trustees considered CWAM's use of commissions paid by each Fund on its portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain research products and services benefiting the Funds and/or other clients of CWAM. The Committee reviewed CWAM's annual "soft dollar" report and met with representatives from CWAM to review CWAM's soft dollar spending. The Committee also considered that the Compliance Committee of the Board regularly reviewed third-party prepared reports that evaluated the quality of CWAM's execution of the Funds' portfolio transactions. The Trustees determined that CWAM's use of the Funds' "soft" commission dollars to obtain research products and services was consistent with current regulatory requirements and guidance. They also concluded that CWAM benefits from the receipt of proprietary research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Funds, and that the Funds benefit from CWAM's receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of CWAM.

After full consideration of the above factors, as well as other factors that were instructive in evaluating the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously concluded that the continuation of the Advisory Agreement was in the best interest of each Fund. On June 8, 2011, the Trustees approved continuation of the Advisory Agreement through July 31, 2012.


31



Wanger International 2011 Semiannual Report

Columbia Wanger Funds

Trustees

Laura M. Born
Chair of the Board

Steven N. Kaplan
Vice Chair of the Board

Michelle L. Collins
Maureen M. Culhane
Margaret M. Eisen
John C. Heaton
Charles P. McQuaid
Allan B. Muchin
David J. Rudis
David B. Small
Ralph Wanger (Trustee Emeritus)

Officers

Charles P. McQuaid
President

Ben Andrews
Vice President

Robert A. Chalupnik
Vice President

Michael G. Clarke
Assistant Treasurer

Joseph F. DiMaria
Assistant Treasurer

P. Zachary Egan
Vice President

John M. Kunka
Assistant Treasurer

Joseph C. LaPalm
Vice President

Bruce H. Lauer
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer

Louis J. Mendes III
Vice President

Robert A. Mohn
Vice President

Christopher J. Olson
Vice President

Christopher O. Petersen
Assistant Secretary

Scott R. Plummer
Assistant Secretary

Linda K. Roth-Wiszowaty
Assistant Secretary

Robert P. Scales
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Legal
Officer, Senior Vice President and
General Counsel

Transfer Agent,
Dividend Disbursing Agent

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp.
P.O. Box 8081
Boston, Massachusetts
02266-8081

Distributor

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc.
225 Franklin Street
Boston, Massachusetts
02110

Investment Adviser

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC
227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000
Chicago, Illinois 60606
1-888-4-WANGER
(1-888-492-6437)

Legal Counsel to the Funds

Perkins Coie LLP
Washington, DC

Legal Counsel to the Independent Trustees

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois

This report, including the schedules of investments and financial statements, is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Wanger Advisors Trust.

A description of the Fund's proxy voting policies and procedures and a copy of the Fund's voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 are available (i) on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov, and (ii) without charge, upon request, by calling 888-492-6437.

The Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund's Form N-Q is available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Pubic Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330. The Fund's complete portfolio holdings are disclosed at www.columbiamanagement.com approximately 30 days after each month-end.


32




Columbia Wanger Funds

© 2011 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved.

C-1452 C (8/11) 122620




Wanger Select

2011 Semiannual Report

Not FDIC insuredNo bank guaranteeMay lose value




  Wanger Select

  2011 Semiannual Report

    Table of Contents

2   Understanding Your Expenses  
3   Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook  
6   Performance Review  
8   Statement of Investments  
13   Statement of Assets and Liabilities  
13   Statement of Operations  
14   Statement of Changes in Net Assets  
15   Financial Highlights  
16   Notes to Financial Statements  
19   Management Fee Evaluation of the Senior Officer  
23   Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement  

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (CWAM) is one of the leading global small- and mid-cap equity managers in the United States with 40 years of small- and mid-cap investment experience. As of June 30, 2011, CWAM managed $35.8 billion in assets, and is the investment adviser to Wanger USA, Wanger International, Wanger Select and Wanger International Select (together, the Columbia Wanger Funds) and the Columbia Acorn Family of Funds.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a mutual fund carefully before investing. For a free prospectus, which contains this and other important information about the Fund, contact your financial adviser or insurance company or contact 1-888-4-WANGER. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.

An important note: Columbia Wanger Funds are available for purchase through variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies offered by the separate accounts of participating insurance companies and qualified pension or retirement plans.

The views expressed in "Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook" and in the Performance Review reflect the current views of the respective authors. These views are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict so actual outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. These views are subject to change at any time based upon economic, market or other conditions and the respective parties disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Columbia Wanger Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any particular Columbia Wanger Fund. References to specific company securities should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice.




Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Understanding Your Expenses

As a Fund shareholder, you incur three types of costs. There are transaction costs, which generally include sales charges on purchases and may include redemption or exchange fees. There are also ongoing costs, which generally include investment advisory fees and other Fund expenses. Lastly, there may be additional fees or charges imposed by the insurance company that sponsors your variable annuity product. The information on this page is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

Analyzing your Fund's expenses

To illustrate these ongoing costs, we have provided an example and calculated the expenses paid by investors in the Fund during the period. The information in the following table is based on an initial hypothetical investment of $1,000, which is invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period. Expense information is calculated two ways and each method provides you with different results. The amount listed in the "Actual" column is calculated using actual operating expenses and total return for the Fund. The amount listed in the "Hypothetical" column assumes that the return each year is 5% before expenses and then applies the Fund's actual expense ratio for the period to the hypothetical return. You should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate either your actual account balance at the end of the period or the expenses you paid during the period. See "Compare with other funds" for details on using the hypothetical data.

Estimating your actual expenses

To estimate the expenses that you actually paid over the period, first you will need your account balance at the end of the period.

1.  Divide your ending account balance by $1,000. For example, if an account balance was $8,600 at the end of the period, the result would be 8.6.

2.  In the section of the table below titled "Expenses paid during the period," you will find a dollar amount in the column labeled "Actual." Multiply this amount by the result from step 1. Your answer is an estimate of the expenses you paid on your account during the period.

January 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011

    Account value at the
beginning of the period ($)
  Account value at the
end of the period ($)
  Expenses paid during
the period ($)
  Fund's annualized
expense ratio (%)*
 
    Actual   Hypothetical   Actual   Hypothetical   Actual   Hypothetical   Actual  
Wanger Select     1,000.00       1,000.00       992.10       1,020.23       4.54       4.61       0.92    

 

* Expenses paid during the period are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, then multiplied by the number of days in the Fund's most recent fiscal half-year and divided by 365.

It is important to note that the expense amounts shown in the table are meant to highlight only ongoing costs of investing in the Fund. Expenses paid during the period do not include any insurance charges imposed by your insurance company's separate account. The hypothetical example provided is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds whose shareholders may incur transaction costs.

Compare with other funds

Since all mutual funds are required to include the same hypothetical calculations about expenses in shareholder reports, you can use this information to compare the ongoing cost of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare the 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples of other funds. As you compare hypothetical examples of other funds, it is important to note that hypothetical examples are meant to highlight the ongoing cost of investing in a fund and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges, redemption fees or exchange fees that may be incurred by shareholders of other funds. Expenses paid during the period do not include any insurance charges imposed by your insurance company's separate accounts.


2



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook

Just five to seven years ago, it was widely believed that North American natural gas resources were being rapidly depleted. Today, the outlook appears to be very much improved thanks to the ingenuity of a few individuals and a process that should provide natural gas for decades to come.

In 1825, some 34 years before Colonel Edwin Drake1 drilled the first oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania, William Aaron Hart drilled the first natural gas well, in shale located in Fredonia, New York. By August of that year, five structures in the village were illuminated by natural gas and by November there were 36 gas lights in the village. In 1857, Preston Barmore, the superintendent of the Fredonia Natural Gas Co., was not satisfied with the production from a 122 foot well so he exploded crevices of rock in the well, increasing the supply of gas. Within a few years, the village had 150 gas lights.2

Plenty of natural gas was subsequently found in sandstone formations under impermeable rock, in similar formations as oil, or accompanied by oil. Extracting this natural gas was less costly than drilling for gas in shale, so shale exploration all but ended. Millions of miles of gas pipelines were built, and demand for natural gas grew.3 U.S.-marketed production rose to 1 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of natural gas by 1923, and has ranged from 16.9 to 22.6 TCF since 1973.4 Natural gas is used for heating and manufacturing, and is a feedstock for fertilizers, plastics and chemicals.

Recent Natural Gas Shortages

In 2004, Julian Darley wrote High Noon for Natural Gas, The New Energy Crisis. He reviewed Hubbert's Peak, a theory named after the geologist who researched oil finding and production curves and then correctly predicted that U.S. oil production would peak around 1970. Darley applied Hubbert's Peak to natural gas data and concluded that North American gas production had also peaked and was likely to plunge.

Darley wrote, "The United States and Canada are entering a natural gas crisis ...North American supply is simply no longer able to meet desired consumption."5 He added, "...the worst immediate problem confronting the United States (and Canada) is not oil, but natural gas. It is a natural gas shortage that could seriously interrupt the U.S. economy..."6 Darley noted that the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) made enormous upward revisions for production of natural gas from shale, tight sands and coal beds, but he believed such gains would fail to occur. Instead, importing of liquefied natural gas (LNG) would have to be an interim solution. But LNG, Darley stated, had safety and security risks. Geopolitically, relying on imported LNG would also be problematic, as Russia and Iran had the largest reserves of natural gas.

Darley believed that the 300-plus new natural gas-fired electric generating stations, built between 1980 and 2003 at a cost of $100 billion, were huge mistakes. The power companies had apparently reviewed a 1999 National Petroleum Council report that stated North American natural gas supplies would grow. Darley labeled that report as an "example of the kind of cornucopian delusion that characterizes many in government and most in industry, who believe in nothing but economics and the miracle of capitalism with its unlimited ability to find substitutes for everything."7

Darley thought that with worldwide Peak Oil imminent and North American natural gas production plunging, energy was to become scarce, and the industrial revolution would unwind. He advocated that people should be able to obtain their daily needs within walking distance from where they lived. His long-term solution was to depopulate the earth, such that mankind no longer mined the planet and consumed only the energy that the sun regularly provides. At one child per woman, the population of the earth would be back to one billion in about one hundred years.

Domestic natural gas production fell between 2001 and 2005 and prices increased between 2002 and 2008.8 Most major oil companies and analysts agreed that natural gas production in North America was peaking, and that the U.S. would need substantial imports of LNG. I remember going to an energy conference in early 2006 where this view was widespread. Darley's nightmare scenario seemed to be coming true.

Back in the Gas Fields

George Mitchell has been called the Father of the Barnett Natural Gas Field, located in and around Fort Worth, Texas. Over an 18-year period beginning in 1981, his company, Mitchell Energy and Development, experimented with fracturing gas-bearing shale that is located between 6,000 and 14,000 feet below the surface. Geologists knew that shale had lots of pores and the ability to store natural gas, but since pores in shale are rarely interconnected, gas flows poorly through shale. Initial attempts to extract this gas were costly, and production was not economical. Eventually, the company developed a "light sand frac" method that was effective and used less fluid. The combination of reduced costs and rising natural gas prices made such drilling profitable. Mitchell drilled many wells at the Barnett field, producing far more natural gas than most people expected.9

Mitchell needed more funding and sold his company to Devon Energy, a larger, independent producer. Devon had expertise in an additional technology, horizontal drilling, which tilted drill holes at angles or sideways once they hit pay dirt. More gas-bearing shale was consequently exposed to the well. With this added technology, the company drilled 55 wells in the Barnett field in 2003 and the shale gas boom began.10 Some 13,500 gas wells have been drilled in the Barnett field since 199711 and the Barnett field accounted for 6% of total natural gas production in the United States in 2010.12

Drilling at other shale gas formations has also jumped. U.S. shale gas production increased 12-fold in the last decade and currently accounts for about 25% of U.S. natural gas production.13 With greater production, natural gas wellhead


3



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

prices halved from 2008 to 2010. In its yearly forecast in 2010, the EIA doubled its estimate of U.S. shale gas production for 2035 and predicts shale gas production will hit 46% of U.S. consumption that year.14 Imports will drop from 11% of natural gas consumption in 2009 to 1%.15 With "economics and the miracle of capitalism"16 we won't need to revert to Darley's dark ages any time soon. The EIA also believes shale gas totaling at least six-times U.S. reserves is recoverable in at least 32 other countries.17

Energy Mix

In 2009, Robert Hefner published The Grand Energy Transition. The book provides perspectives on past and future sources and uses of energy. Hefner believes that energy usage naturally transitions from solids (wood and coal) to liquids (oil) and then to gasses (natural gas, wind and hopefully nuclear fusion). He sees newer fuels as superior to older ones, with each new fuel facilitating new technologies, improvements in the environment and higher living standards.

The transition to coal from wood powered the industrial revolution and allowed millions of acres of forests to regrow. Coal then fell from 80% of the world energy market in 1900 to about 28% currently. Oil ascended to 48% of the world's energy by 1973, displacing much dirty coal and revolutionizing transportation via the introduction of automobiles and airplanes. Oil subsequently dropped to about 36% of world energy consumption. Natural gas has risen from 10% of the world's energy in 1950 to 24% currently.18

Believing in global warming, Hefner notes that the transition from wood to coal to oil to natural gas slashed carbon content and increased hydrogen content of fuels with each transition. Since burning carbon creates carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary greenhouse gas, and burning hydrogen creates water, the natural transitions from solids to liquids to gasses slow global warming. Burning natural gas creates 44% less CO2 than burning coal and 29% less than burning oil. Burning natural gas also emits about 80% less nitrogen oxides, over 90% lower particulates and over 99% less sulfur dioxide than coal or oil.19

Under an earlier belief that the U.S. was running out of natural gas, the Natural Gas Policy Act (NPGA) and the Fuel Use Act were passed in 1978. The NGPA immediately deregulated prices for gas produced from deep wells and phased out other price controls.20 The Fuel Use Act mandated the phase out of natural gas for electric generation and restricted its industrial uses. Prices for deep gas jumped, but so did drilling. Production grew, and with demand depressed by the Fuel Use Act, prices then collapsed. There was an excess supply of natural gas, known as the "gas bubble," until the year 2000.

Hefner believes the 1978 laws slowed the natural transition from coal and oil to natural gas. As a result of the Fuel Use Act, some 100,000 megawatts of coal-fired electric generating capacity was built in the United States through 1989 that has emitted 15 billion metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.21 Hefner believes that the construction of the coal burning plants, not the natural gas burning plants, was the big mistake.

Hefner subscribes to Peak Oil occurring soon, but sees many decades of abundant and relatively cheap natural gas. Hence, he predicts the grand energy transition to natural gas will continue, and he believes natural gas will be a bridge fuel to renewable energy and possibly nuclear fusion. Natural gas complements wind energy quite well, as gas-burning electric plants can quickly power up when the wind slows.

Some 12 million vehicles worldwide are powered by natural gas. Of that number, there are estimated to be 110,000 natural gas-powered vehicles in the United States,22 including thousands of trucks serving the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles,23 more than 11,000 buses24 and approximately 12,000 Honda Civic GX cars.25 These vehicles burn natural gas currently priced at one-third of the energy equivalent price of oil. Hefner believes that half the autos in the United States should be powered by natural gas, and the dirtiest, coal-burning electric plants should be replaced by natural gas plants. Yearly gas consumption would rise by 13 TCF, but could be met by increased shale gas production.26

Investment Implications

We believe that innovations in producing gas from shale have indeed transformed the U.S. energy outlook. We profitably invested in some of the pioneers of shale gas though, with the current glut of natural gas, the stocks now look less attractive. Supplies of gas may remain high in the short term as some unprofitable drilling persists in order to keep lease rights. Over time, the low prices will likely result in reduced drilling and more constrained supplies. When this happens, natural gas prices should rise to a level where drilling and production are moderately profitable. We continue to look for suppliers and service companies participating in shale gas production. Some shale oil fields are now being developed, including the Bakken field in North Dakota and Canada and the Eagle Ford field in Texas. At this point, we don't think there will be enough shale oil production to revolutionize the oil market, but we do believe we have found some attractive stocks participating in those developments.

Charles P. McQuaid
President and Chief Investment Officer
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC


4



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

The information and data provided in this analysis are derived from sources that we deem to be reliable and accurate. These views are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict so actual outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. The views/opinions expressed in this essay are those of the author and not of the Columbia Wanger Funds Board, are subject to change at any time based upon economic, market or other conditions, may differ from views expressed by other Columbia Management associates and the respective parties disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Columbia Wanger Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any particular Columbia Wanger Fund.

1  Colonel Edwin Drake was an American oil driller, credited with being the first to drill for oil in the United States.

2  Lash, Eileen and Gary, "The Early History of Natural Gas, Kicking Down the Well," The SUNY Fredonia Shale Research Institute, June 3, 2011, http://www.fredonia.edu/shaleinstitute/history.asp.

3  U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/ngpipeline/index.html.

4  EIA data, including imports primarily from Canada, states the U.S. has been using about 23 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas a year, including about 6.6 TCF for industrial purposes. www.eia.gov.

5  Darley, Julian, High Noon for Natural Gas, The New Energy Crisis, (White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing Company 2004) p. 13.

6  Ibid., p. 2.

7  Ibid., p. 79-80.

8  According to EIA data, domestic natural gas production fell from 20.6 TCF in 2001 to 18.9 TCF in 2005. Average annual wellhead prices rose from $3 to $5 in 2002-2003 to $6 to $8 from 2006-2008. www.eia.gov.

9  Airhart, Marc, "The Father of the Barnett Natural Gas Field," http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-father.html.

10  Yergin, Daniel, "Stepping on the Gas," Wall Street Journal, April 2, 2011.

11  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

12  U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas, Development in the United States: A Primer," April 2009, p. ES-1, http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/naturalgas_general/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

13  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

14  Lomax, Simon, "Shale-Gas Output May Double by 2035, Reducing Energy Imports, U.S. Says," Bloomberg, December 16, 2010, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-16/natural-gas-production-from-shale-may-double-by-35-u-s-agency-forecasts.html.

15  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

16  Darley, Julian, op. cit., p. 79-80.

17  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

18  Hefner III, Robert A., "The Grand Energy Transition," (Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2009) p. 27.

19  U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas, Development in the United States: A Primer," April 2009, p. 5, http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/naturalgas_general/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

20  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 120-121. Having been an independent explorer for natural gas, Hefner was well aware that gas existed in locations independently of oil. (He has been called the "Father of Deep Natural Gas" as his company drilled very deep wells finding only natural gas at very high pressure.) In the 1970s when geologists for major oil companies testified to Congress that the U.S. was running out of natural gas, Hefner dissented, believing that the shortage was caused by price controls in place since 1954. Price controls cause shortages of valuable commodities by boosting demand and restraining supplies.

21  Ibid., p. 122.

22  Natural Gas Vehicles of America, http://www.ngvc.org/mktplace/index.html. Accessed July 20, 2011.

23  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 201.

24  Natural Gas Vehicles of America, http://www.ngvc.org/mktplace/index.html. Accessed July 20, 2011.

25  Oberman, Mira, "The Greenest Car You've (Likely) Never Heard Of," Agence France-Presse, April 11, 2011.

26  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 203.


5



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Performance Review Wanger Select

   
Ben Andrews
Lead Portfolio Manager
  Robert A. Chalupnik
Co-Portfolio Manager
 

 

Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Please visit columbiamanagement.com for performance updates for the most recent month-end.

Wanger Select fell 0.79% during the semiannual period ended June 30, 2011, underperforming the 8.56% gain of its primary benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Year-to-date performance was hampered by poor performance of Fund energy stocks and the failure of many holdings to participate in the recent market rally.

Looking first at the stocks that helped the portfolio during the period, Discover Financial Services added 2.07% to the portfolio's return as the company's credit card portfolio continued to heal in the improving economy. This improvement caused investors to increase the valuation they were willing to pay for Discover, bidding up the stock price and providing a 45% gain for the period. Retailers Abercrombie & Fitch, lululemon athletica and Coach added approximately 1.85% to the portfolio as their products were well-received by consumers.

On the downside, Pacific Rubiales Energy and Canacol Energy, both oil and gas explorers and producers, cost the portfolio a combined 2.32% on disappointing exploration results and a general malaise for Colombian oil producers. Over the six-month period, energy stocks cost the Fund approximately 3.7% of performance, and were the main laggards in the portfolio. We still believe in these stocks and will watch their results closely as we expect several more drilling results by the end of this year.

Though many of the Fund's stocks did not participate in the stock market rally through June 30, 2011, we believe they have potential to add return in the coming quarters as these companies are growing and we believe they are valued inexpensively compared with their peers.

During the period, we sold out of 10 companies and purchased seven new companies. The sales included wireless communications and broadcast tower company American Tower, water treatment applications service provider Nalco Holding Company, for-profit post-secondary education provider Career Education, and recreational vehicle manufacturer Thor Industries. Our purchases included convention hotelier Gaylord Entertainment, fiber optic sub-systems and components provider Finisar, and telecom and electrical power infrastructure contractor Quanta Services. Quanta is a company that we owned previously but sold due to uncertainty about its ability to turn contracts/backlog into sales. There is evidence of this backlog becoming revenue, so we added the company back into the portfolio during the quarter.

Effective May 1, 2011, Rob Chalupnik was named co-portfolio manager of Wanger Select. Rob is CWAM's domestic industrials analyst and has a strong track record at CWAM. I have worked closely with Rob over the years and feel strongly that his knowledge and ability will be additive to the performance of this Fund, not only through his stock picks but through his input on portfolio structure as well.

Risks include stock market fluctuations due to economic and business developments. The Fund also has potentially greater price volatility due to the Fund's concentration in a limited number of stocks of mid-size companies. The Fund is a non-diversified fund and may, therefore, have a greater risk of loss from a few issuers than a similar fund that invests more broadly. The Fund may not operate as a non-diversified fund at all times. International investments involve greater potential risks, including less regulation, currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments.

Portfolio holdings are subject to change periodically and may not be representative of current holdings.

Fund's Positions in Mentioned Holdings

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

Discover Financial Services     6.5 %  
Abercrombie & Fitch     3.6    
Pacific Rubiales Energy     3.3    
Coach     3.1    
Canacol Energy     2.6    
lululemon athletica     1.9    
Quanta Services     1.4    
Gaylord Entertainment     1.2    
Finisar     0.3    


6



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Growth of a $10,000 Investment in Wanger Select
February 1, 1999 (inception date) through June 30, 2011

Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Performance results reflect any fee waivers or reimbursements of Fund expenses by the investment adviser and/or any of its affiliates. Absent these fee waivers and/or expense reimbursement arrangements, performance results would have been lower. For daily and most recent month-end performance updates, please call 1-888-4-WANGER.

This graph compares the results of $10,000 invested in Wanger Select on February 1, 1999 (the date the Fund began operations) through June 30, 2011, to the S&P MidCap 400 Index, with dividends and capital gains reinvested. Although the index is provided for use in assessing the Fund's performance, the Fund's holdings may differ significantly from those in the index.

Top 10 Holdings

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

1. Discover Financial Services
Credit Card Company
  6.5
%  
2. Hertz
Largest U.S. Rental Car Operator
  6.5
 
3. CNO Financial Group
Life, Long-term Care & Medical Supplement Insurance
  4.3
 
4. Ametek
Aerospace/Industrial Instruments
  4.0
 
5. Abercrombie & Fitch
Teen Apparel Retailer
  3.6
 
6. Sanmina-SCI
Electronic Manufacturing Services
  3.5
 
7. Safeway
Supermarkets
  3.4
 
8. Pacific Rubiales Energy (Colombia)
Oil Production & Exploration in Colombia
  3.3
 
9. Coach
Designer & Retailer of Branded Leather Accessories
  3.1
 
10. Crown Castle International
Communications Towers
  3.0
 

Top 5 Sectors

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

Consumer Goods & Services     23.9 %  
Industrial Goods & Services     18.9    
Energy & Minerals     15.4    
Information     15.1    
Finance     14.1    

 

Results as of June 30, 2011

    2nd quarter   Year to date   1 year   5 years   10 years  
Wanger Select     -1.37 %     -0.79 %     31.51 %     5.70 %     8.85 %  
S&P MidCap 400 Index*     -0.73       8.56       39.38       6.60       7.94    
S&P 500 Index     0.10       6.02       30.69       2.94       2.72    
Lipper Mid-Cap Growth
Funds Variable
Underlying Index
    0.47       8.38       41.64       6.86       4.54    

 

NAV as of 6/30/11: $28.14

* The Fund's primary benchmark.

Performance numbers reflect all Fund expenses but do not include any fees and expenses imposed under your variable annuity or life insurance policy or qualified pension or retirement plan. If performance included the effect of these additional charges, it would be lower.

The Fund's annual operating expense ratio is 0.93%. The annual operating expense ratio is as stated in the Fund's prospectus that is current as of the date of this report. Differences in expense ratios disclosed elsewhere in this report may result from including fee waivers and reimbursements as well as different time periods used in calculating the ratios.

All results shown assume reinvestment of distributions and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the sale of Fund shares.

The S&P MidCap 400 Index is a market value-weighted index that tracks the performance of 400 mid-cap U.S. companies. The S&P 500 tracks the performance of 500 widely-held large capitalization U.S. stocks and is presented to show performance against a widely recognized market index. The Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds Variable Underlying Index is an equally weighted representation of the 30 largest variable insurance underlying funds in the Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds Variable Underlying Classification. Indexes are not managed and do not incur fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Lipper Inc., a widely respected data provider in the industry, calculates an average total return (assuming reinvestment of distributions) for mutual funds with investment objectives similar to those of the Fund. Lipper makes no adjustment for the effect of sales loads.

Portfolio characteristics and holdings are subject to change periodically and may not be representative of current characteristics and holdings.


7




Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Equities – 94.5%  
    Consumer Goods & Services – 23.9%  
    Retail – 9.8%  
  171,000     Abercrombie & Fitch
Teen Apparel Retailer
  $ 11,443,320    
  463,000     Safeway
Supermarkets
    10,820,310    
  54,550     lululemon athletica (a)
Premium Active Apparel Retailer
    6,099,781    
  38,000     Tiffany & Co.
Luxury Good Retailer
    2,983,760    
      31,347,171    
    Travel – 7.7%  
  1,303,000     Hertz (a)
Largest U.S. Rental Car Operator
    20,691,640    
  132,000     Gaylord Entertainment (a)
Convention Hotels
    3,960,000    
      24,651,640    
    Apparel – 3.1%  
  154,500     Coach
Designer & Retailer of Branded Leather Accessories
    9,877,185    
    Casinos & Gaming – 1.5%  
  50,663,000     RexLot Holdings (China)
Lottery Equipment Supplier in China
    4,900,698    
    Educational Services – 1.3%  
  54,625     ITT Educational Services (a)
Post-secondary Degree Services
    4,273,860    
    Food & Beverage – 0.3%  
  146,000     GLG Life Tech (Canada) (a)
Produce an All-natural Sweetener
Extracted from the Stevia Plant
    981,120    
    Other Consumer Services – 0.2%  
  347,950     IFM Investments (Century 21 China RE) –
ADR (China) (a)
Provides Real Estate Services in China
    511,487    
        Total Consumer Goods & Services     76,543,161    
    Industrial Goods & Services – 18.9%  
    Machinery – 11.3%  
  283,500     Ametek
Aerospace/Industrial Instruments
    12,729,150    
  121,750     Donaldson
Industrial Air Filtration
    7,387,790    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  130,000     Pall
Filtration & Fluids Clarification
  $ 7,309,900    
  137,000     Kennametal
Consumable Cutting Tools
    5,782,770    
  101,000     Oshkosh (a)
Specialty Truck Manufacturer
    2,922,940    
      36,132,550    
    Waste Management – 2.2%  
  188,500     Waste Management
U.S. Garbage Collection & Disposal
    7,025,395    
    Other Industrial Services – 1.9%  
  116,500     Expeditors International of Washington
International Freight Forwarder
    5,963,635    
    Industrial Distribution – 1.6%  
  34,500     WW Grainger
Industrial Distribution
    5,300,925    
    Outsourcing Services – 1.4%  
  221,000     Quanta Services (a)
Electrical & Telecom Construction Services
    4,464,200    
    Industrial Materials & Specialty Chemicals – 0.5%  
  227,600     ChemSpec International – ADR (China) (a)
Specialty Chemicals with Focus on
Fluorinated Chemical Manufacturing
    1,638,720    
        Total Industrial Goods & Services     60,525,425    
    Energy & Minerals – 15.4%  
    Oil & Gas Producers – 10.3%  
  388,750     Pacific Rubiales Energy (Colombia)
Oil Production & Exploration in Colombia
    10,419,605    
  7,499,000     Canacol Energy (Colombia) (a)
Oil Producer in South America
    8,241,941    
  5,368,900     ShaMaran Petroleum (Iraq) (a)
Oil Exploration in Kurdistan
    4,230,768    
  225,000     Houston American Energy (b)
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production in Colombia
    4,079,250    
  8,714,000     Petrodorado (Colombia) (a)     2,755,736    
  5,714,000     Petrodorado – Warrants (Colombia) (a)(c)
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production in
Colombia, Peru & Paraguay
    580,020    
  3,600,000     Canadian Overseas Petroleum
(United Kingdom) (a)(c)
    1,664,410    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
8



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Oil & Gas Producers – 10.3% (cont)  
  1,800,000     Canadian Overseas Petroleum – Warrants
(United Kingdom) (a)(c)
Oil & Gas Exploration/Production in the North Sea
  $ 245,238    
  1,875,000     Petromanas (Canada) (a)(c)     552,517    
  700,000     Petromanas (Canada) (a)     210,483    
  937,500     Petromanas – Warrants (Canada) (a)(c)
Exploring for Oil in Albania
    23,815    
      33,003,783    
    Alternative Energy – 2.4%  
  511,600     Canadian Solar (China) (a)(b)
Solar Cell & Module Manufacturer
    5,883,400    
  582,600     Synthesis Energy Systems (China) (a)
Owner/Operator of Gasification Plants
    1,089,462    
  226,000     Real Goods Solar (a)
Residential Solar Energy Installer
    668,960    
      7,641,822    
    Agricultural Commodities – 1.4%  
  1,363,636     Union Agriculture Group (Argentina) (a)(c)
Farmland Operator in Uruguay
    2,999,999    
  5,000,000     Eacom Timber (Canada) (a)(c)     1,574,991    
  162,000     Eacom Timber (Canada) (a)
Canadian Lumber Producer
    52,071    
      4,627,061    
    Mining – 0.8%  
  152,000     Kirkland Lake Gold (Canada) (a)
Gold Mining
    2,395,562    
    Oil Services – 0.5%  
  1,635,400     Tuscany International Drilling
(Colombia) (a)
    1,560,027    
  200,000     Tuscany International Drilling –
Warrants (Colombia) (a)
South America-based Drilling Rig Contractor
    7,258    
      1,567,285    
        Total Energy & Minerals     49,235,513    
    Information – 15.1%  
    Mobile Communications – 5.3%  
  234,000     Crown Castle International (a)
Communications Towers
    9,544,860    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  117,000     SBA Communications (a)
Communications Towers
  $ 4,468,230    
  2,326,900     Globalstar (a)
Satellite Mobile Voice & Data Carrier
    2,862,087    
      16,875,177    
    Contract Manufacturing – 3.5%  
  1,078,333     Sanmina-SCI (a)
Electronic Manufacturing Services
    11,139,180    
    Computer Hardware & Related Equipment – 1.9%  
  116,000     Amphenol
Electronic Connectors
    6,262,840    
    Computer Services – 1.8%  
  641,000     WNS – ADR (India) (a)
Offshore BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) Services
    5,698,490    
    Instrumentation – 1.0%  
  19,000     Mettler Toledo (a)
Laboratory Equipment
    3,204,730    
    Advertising – 0.5%  
  540,100     VisionChina Media – ADR (China) (a)
Advertising on Digital Screens in China's
Mass Transit System
    1,528,483    
    Business Software – 0.4%  
  27,500     Concur Technologies (a)
Web Enabled Cost & Expense Management Software
    1,376,925    
    Business Information & Marketing Services – 0.4%  
  122,200     Navigant Consulting (a)
Financial Consulting Firm
    1,281,878    
    Telecommunications Equipment – 0.3%  
  49,000     Finisar (a)
Optical Sub-systems & Components
    883,470    
        Total Information     48,251,173    
    Finance – 14.1%  
    Credit Cards – 6.5%  
  783,200     Discover Financial Services
Credit Card Company
    20,950,600    
    Insurance – 4.3%  
  1,721,000     CNO Financial Group (a)
Life, Long-term Care & Medical Supplement Insurance
    13,613,110    

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
9



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Brokerage & Money Management – 3.3%  
  854,000     MF Global (a)
Futures Broker
  $ 6,609,960    
  171,000     SEI Investments
Mutual Fund Administration & Investment Management
    3,849,210    
      10,459,170    
        Total Finance     45,022,880    
    Other Industries – 5.4%  
    Transportation – 2.9%  
  198,250     JB Hunt Transport Services
Truck & Intermodal Carrier
    9,335,593    
    Real Estate – 1.8%  
  294,500     BioMed Realty Trust
Life Science-focused Office Buildings
    5,666,180    
    Regulated Utilities – 0.7%  
  76,000     Wisconsin Energy
Wisconsin Utility
    2,382,600    
        Total Other Industries     17,384,373    
    Health Care – 1.7%  
    Biotechnology & Drug Delivery – 0.9%  
  310,000     NPS Pharmaceuticals (a)
Orphan Drugs & Healthy Royalties
    2,929,500    
    Pharmaceuticals – 0.8%  
  363,000     Akorn (a)
Develops, Manufactures & Sells Specialty Generic Drugs
    2,541,000    
        Total Health Care     5,470,500    
Total Equities
(Cost: $229,464,772) – 94.5%
    302,433,025    
Securities Lending Collateral – 0.4%      
  1,194,320     Dreyfus Government Cash
Management Fund (d)
(7 day yield of 0.00%)
    1,194,320    
Total Securities Lending Collateral
(Cost: $1,194,320)
    1,194,320    

 

Principal Amount       Value  
Short-Term Obligation – 5.0%  
    Repurchase Agreement – 5.0%  
$ 16,008,000     Repurchase Agreement with Fixed
Income Clearing Corp., dated 6/30/11,
due 7/01/11 at 0.01%, collateralized
by a U.S. Government Agency obligation
maturing 9/08/17, market value
$16,330,725 (repurchase proceeds
$16,008,004)
  $ 16,008,000    
Total Short-Term Obligation
(Cost: $16,008,000)
    16,008,000    
Total Investments
(Cost: $246,667,092) – 99.9% (e)(f)
    319,635,345    
Obligation to Return Collateral for
Securities Loaned – (0.4)%
    (1,194,320 )  
Cash and Other Assets Less Liabilities – 0.5%     1,736,659    
Total Net Assets – 100.0%   $ 320,177,684    

 

Notes to Statement of Investments:

(a)  Non-income producing security.

(b)  All or a portion of this security was on loan at June 30, 2011. The total market value of securities on loan at June 30, 2011 was $1,145,198.

(c)  Denotes a restricted security, which is subject to restrictions on resale under federal securities laws. These securities are valued at a fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. At June 30, 2011, the market value of these securities amounted to $7,640,990 which represented 2.39% of total net assets.

  Additional information on these securities is as follows:


Security
  Acquisition
Dates
  Shares   Cost   Value  
Union Agriculture Group   12/08/10     1,363,636     $ 2,999,999     $ 2,999,999    
Canadian Overseas
Petroleum
  11/24/10     3,600,000       1,539,065       1,664,410    
Eacom Timber   3/17/10     5,000,000       2,475,248       1,574,991    
Petrodorado – Warrants   11/20/09     5,714,000       706,004       580,020    
Petromanas   5/20/10     1,875,000       651,600       552,517    
Canadian Overseas
Petroleum – Warrants
  11/24/10     1,800,000       225,295       245,238    
Petromanas – Warrants   5/20/10     937,500       54,282       23,815    
            $ 8,651,493     $ 7,640,990    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
10



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

(d)  Investment made with cash collateral received from securities lending activity.

(e)  On June 30, 2011, the market value of foreign securities represents 12.3% of total net assets. The Fund's foreign portfolio was diversified as follows:

Currency   Value   Cost   Percentage of
Net Assets
 
Canadian Dollar   $ 34,514,442     $ 19,252,362       10.8    
Hong Kong Dollar     4,900,698       3,210,487       1.5    
    $ 39,415,140     $ 22,462,849       12.3    

 

(f)  At June 30, 2011, for federal income tax purposes cost of investments was $246,667,092 and net unrealized appreciation was $72,968,253 consisting of gross unrealized appreciation of $101,681,181 and gross unrealized depreciation of $28,712,928.

  ADR = American Depositary Receipts

  Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments, following the input prioritization hierarchy established by GAAP. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

  Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

  Level 2 – prices determined using other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others)

  Level 3 – prices determined using significant unobservable inputs where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable or less reliable (including management's own assumptions about the factors market participants would use in pricing an investment)

  The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

  Examples of the types of securities in which the Fund would typically invest and how they are classified within this hierarchy are as follows. Typical Level 1 securities include exchange traded domestic equities, mutual funds whose NAVs are published each day and exchange traded foreign equities that are not statistically fair valued. Typical Level 2 securities include exchange traded foreign equities that are statistically fair valued, forward foreign currency exchange contracts and short-term investments valued at amortized cost. Additionally, securities fair valued by the Valuation Committee of the Fund's Board of Trustees that rely on significant observable inputs are also included in Level 2. Typical Level 3 securities include any security fair valued by the Valuation Committee that relies on significant unobservable inputs.

The following table summarizes the inputs used, as of June 30, 2011, in valuing the Fund's assets:





Investment Type
 


Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Other
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total  
Equities  
Consumer Goods &
Services
  $ 71,642,463     $ 4,900,698     $     $ 76,543,161    
Industrial Goods &
Services
    60,525,425                   60,525,425    
Energy & Minerals     41,594,523       4,640,991       2,999,999       49,235,513    
Information     48,251,173                   48,251,173    
Finance     45,022,880                   45,022,880    
Other Industries     17,384,373                   17,384,373    
Health Care     5,470,500                   5,470,500    
Total Equities     289,891,337       9,541,689       2,999,999       302,433,025    
Total Securities
Lending Collateral
    1,194,320                   1,194,320    
Total Short-Term
Obligation
          16,008,000             16,008,000    
Total Investments   $ 291,085,657     $ 25,549,689     $ 2,999,999     $ 319,635,345    

 

  The Fund's assets assigned to the Level 2 input category are generally valued using a market approach, in which a security's value is determined through its correlation to prices and information from observable market transactions for similar or identical assets. Securities acquired via private placement that have a holding period or an extended settlement period are valued at a discount to the same shares that are trading freely on the market. These discounts are determined by the adviser's experience with similar securities or situations. Factors may include, but are not limited to, trade volume, shares outstanding and stock price. Foreign equities are generally valued at the last sales price on the foreign exchange or market on which they trade. The Fund may use a systematic fair valuation model provided by an independent third party to value securities principally traded in foreign markets in order to adjust for possible stale pricing that may occur between the close of the foreign exchanges and the time for valuation. These models take into account available market data including intraday index, ADR, and ETF movements. Warrants which do not trade are valued as a percentage of the actively trading common stock using a model, based on Black Scholes.

  Certain short-term obligations may be valued using amortized cost, an income approach which converts future cash flows to a present value based upon the discount or premium at purchase.

  The Fund's assets assigned to the Level 3 input category are valued at fair value as determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees. To determine fair value, management will utilize the valuation technique that they deem the most appropriate in the circumstances. Securities acquired via private placement but are not yet trading are valued using a market approach for which management has determined that the original transaction price is the best representation of fair value. The original cost may be adjusted for the market movement in an index, ETF or similar security during the period it does not trade.

  There were no significant transfers of financial assets between levels 1 and 2 during the period.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
11



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger Select

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

The following table reconciles asset balances for the six months ending June 30, 2011, in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining value:

Investments in
Securities
  Balance as of
December 31,
2010
  Realized
Gain/(Loss)
  Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
  Purchases   Sales   Transfers
into
Level 3
  Transfers
out of
Level 3
  Balance
as of
June 30,
2011
 
Equities
Energy & Minerals
  $ 2,999,999     $     $     $     $     $     $     $ 2,999,999    

  The information in the above reconciliation table represents fiscal year to date activity for any securities identified as using Level 3 inputs at either the beginning or the end of the current fiscal period.

  The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) attributed to securities owned at June 30, 2011, which were valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) amounted to $0. This amount is included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets.

  At June 30, 2011, the Fund held investments in the following sectors:

Sector   Percentage of
Net Assets
 
Consumer Goods & Services     23.9    
Industrial Goods & Services     18.9    
Energy & Minerals     15.4    
Information     15.1    
Finance     14.1    
Other Industries     5.4    
Health Care     1.7    
        94.5    
Securities Lending Collateral     0.4    
Short-Term Obligation     5.0    
Obligation to Return Collateral for Securities Loaned     (0.4 )  
Cash and Other Assets less Liabilities     0.5    
      100.0    

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
12




Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Statement of Assets and Liabilities
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Assets:  
Investments, at cost   $ 246,667,092    
Investments, at value
(including securities on loan of $1,145,198)
  $ 319,635,345    
Cash     81    
Receivable for:  
Investments sold     2,731,635    
Fund shares sold     442,192    
Securities lending income     1,485    
Dividends     211,182    
Interest     4    
Other assets     1,381    
Total Assets     323,023,305    
Liabilities:  
Collateral on securities loaned     1,194,320    
Payable for:  
Investments purchased     1,351,051    
Fund shares repurchased     4,139    
Investment advisory fee     202,441    
Administration fee     12,653    
Transfer agent fee     17    
Trustees' fees     283    
Reports to shareholders     46,361    
Trustees' deferred compensation plan     23,732    
Other liabilities     10,624    
Total Liabilities     2,845,621    
Net Assets   $ 320,177,684    
Composition of Net Assets:  
Paid-in capital   $ 257,413,504    
Accumulated net investment loss     (9,976,183 )  
Accumulated net realized loss     (227,748 )  
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:  
Investments     72,968,253    
Foreign currency translations     (142 )  
Net Assets   $ 320,177,684    
Fund Shares Outstanding     11,380,035    
Net asset value, offering price and redemption
price per share
  $ 28.14    

Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Investment Income:  
Dividends (net foreign taxes withheld of $13,402)   $ 1,024,152    
Securities lending income, net     5,026    
Interest income     1,532    
Total Investment Income     1,030,710    
Expenses:  
Investment advisory fee     1,336,031    
Administration fee     83,502    
Transfer agent fee     114    
Trustees' fees     11,315    
Custody fee     37,096    
Chief compliance officer expenses (See Note 4)     4,835    
Other expenses (See Note 5)     62,717    
Total Expenses     1,535,610    
Custody earnings credit     (30 )  
Net Expenses     1,535,580    
Net Investment Loss     (504,870 )  
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on
Investments and Foreign Currency:
 
Net realized gain (loss) on:  
Investments     27,154,996    
Foreign currency transactions     (12,603 )  
Net realized gain     27,142,393    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:  
Investments     (29,200,842 )  
Foreign currency translations     (396 )  
Net change in unrealized
appreciation (depreciation)
    (29,201,238 )  
Net Loss     (2,058,845 )  
Net Decrease in Net Assets from Operations   $ (2,563,715 )  

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
13



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets:   (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 
Operations:  
Net investment loss   $ (504,870 )   $ (1,102,852 )  
Net realized gain (loss) on:  
Unaffiliated investments     27,154,996       6,624,963    
Affiliated investments (See Note 4)           5,633,250    
Foreign currency transactions     (12,603 )     81,501    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:  
Unaffiliated investments     (29,200,842 )     58,926,777    
Affiliated investments (See Note 4)           813,341    
Foreign currency translations     (396 )     254    
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations     (2,563,715 )     70,977,234    
Distributions to Shareholders:  
From net investment income     (6,570,049 )     (1,632,499 )  
Share Transactions:  
Subscriptions     10,368,498       40,253,904    
Distributions reinvested     6,570,049       1,632,499    
Redemptions     (33,586,628 )     (35,639,991 )  
Net Increase (Decrease) from Fund Share Transactions     (16,648,081 )     6,246,412    
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets     (25,781,845 )     75,591,147    
Net Assets:  
Beginning of period     345,959,529       270,368,382    
End of period   $ 320,177,684     $ 345,959,529    
Accumulated net investment loss at end of period   $ (9,976,183 )   $ (2,901,264 )  

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
14




Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Financial Highlights

    (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Year Ended December 31,  
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007   2006  
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period   $ 28.99     $ 23.05     $ 13.87     $ 28.08     $ 26.15     $ 22.66    
Income from Investment Operations:  
Net investment loss (a)     (0.04 )     (0.09 )     (0.08 )     (0.10 )     (0.04 )     (0.05 )  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency     (0.22 )     6.17       9.26       (13.38 )     2.47       4.38    
Total from Investment Operations     (0.26 )     6.08       9.18       (13.48 )     2.43       4.33    
Less Distributions to Shareholders:  
From net investment income     (0.59 )     (0.14 )                       (0.09 )  
From net realized gains                       (0.73 )     (0.50 )     (0.75 )  
Total Distributions to Shareholders     (0.59 )     (0.14 )           (0.73 )     (0.50 )     (0.84 )  
Net Asset Value, End of Period   $ 28.14     $ 28.99     $ 23.05     $ 13.87     $ 28.08     $ 26.15    
Total Return (b)     (0.79 )%(c)     26.57 %     66.19 %     (49.06 )%     9.39 %     19.70 %  
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data:  
Net expenses (d)     0.92 %(e)     0.93 %     0.95 %     0.91 %     0.90 %     0.94 %  
Net investment loss (d)     (0.30 )%(e)     (0.38 )%     (0.44 )%     (0.45 )%     (0.15 )%     (0.20 )%  
Portfolio turnover rate     14 %(c)     30 %     35 %     36 %     15 %     21 %  
Net assets, end of period (000s)   $ 320,178     $ 345,960     $ 270,368     $ 156,588     $ 316,380     $ 175,346    

 

(a)  Net investment loss per share was based upon the average shares outstanding during the period.

(b)  Total return at net asset value assuming all distributions reinvested.

(c)  Not annualized.

(d)  The benefits derived from custody fees paid indirectly had an impact of less than 0.01%.

(e)  Annualized.

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
15




Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.  Nature of Operations

Wanger Select (the "Fund"), is a series of Wanger Advisors Trust (the "Trust"), an open-end management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. The investment objective of the Fund is to seek long-term capital appreciation. The Fund is available only for allocation to certain life insurance company separate accounts established for the purpose of funding qualified and non-qualified variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies and may also be offered directly to certain types of pension plans and retirement arrangements.

2.  Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Security valuation

Securities of the Fund are valued at market value or, if a market quotation for a security is not readily available or is deemed not to be reliable because of events or circumstances that have occurred between the market quotation and the time as of which the security is to be valued, the security is valued at its fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. A security traded on a securities exchange or in an over-the-counter market in which transaction prices are reported is valued at the last sales price at the time of valuation. A security traded principally on NASDAQ is valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds are valued at their closing net asset value as reported to NASDAQ. A security for which there is no reported sale on the valuation date is valued at the latest bid quotation. Short-term investments maturing in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. A security for which a market quotation is not readily available and any other assets are valued at their fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. The Trust has retained an independent statistical fair value pricing service that employs a systematic methodology to assist in the fair valuation process for securities principally traded in a foreign market in order to adjust for possible changes in value that may occur between the close of the foreign market and the time as of which the securities are to be valued. If a security is valued at a fair value, that value may be different from the last quoted market price for the security.

Repurchase agreements

The Fund may engage in repurchase agreement transactions. The Fund, through its custodian, receives delivery of underlying securities collateralizing each repurchase agreement. The counterparty is required to maintain collateral that is at all times at least equal to the repurchase price including interest. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, realization and/or retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings.

Foreign currency translations

Values of investments denominated in foreign currencies are converted into U.S. dollars using the New York spot market rate of exchange at the time of valuation. Purchases and sales of investments and dividend and interest income are translated into U.S. dollars using the spot market rate of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. The gain or loss resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates is included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss from investments, as appropriate.

Securities lending

The Fund may lend securities up to one-third of the value of its total assets to certain approved brokers, dealers and other financial institutions to earn additional income. The Fund retains the benefits of owning the securities, including receipt of dividends or interest generated by the security. The Fund also receives a fee for the loan. The Fund has the ability to recall the loans at any time and could do so in order to vote proxies or to sell the loaned securities. Each loan is collateralized by cash that exceeded the value of the securities on loan. The market value of the loaned securities is determined daily at the close of business of the Fund and any additional required collateral is delivered to each Fund on the next business day. The Fund has elected to invest the cash collateral in the Dreyfus Government Cash Management Fund and the income earned is paid to the Fund, net of any fees remitted to Goldman Sachs Agency Lending as the lending agent and borrower rebates. The Fund's adviser, Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (CWAM), does not retain any fees earned by the lending program. Generally, in the event of borrower default, the Fund has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. In the event the Fund is delayed or prevented from exercising its right to dispose of the collateral, there may be a potential loss to the Fund. Some of these losses may be indemnified by the lending agent. The Fund bears the risk of loss with respect to the investment of collateral.

The net lending income earned by the Fund as of June 30, 2011, is included in the Statement of Operations.

Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed) and dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, except that certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as soon as the information is available to the Fund. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes amortization of discounts on debt obligations when required for federal income tax purposes. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

Awards, if any, from class action litigation related to securities owned may be recorded as a reduction of cost of those securities. If the applicable securities are no longer owned, the proceeds are recorded as realized gains.

Restricted securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Board of Trustees.

Fund share valuation

Fund shares are sold and redeemed on a daily basis at net asset value. Net asset value per share is determined daily as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) on each day the Exchange is open for trading by dividing the total value of the Fund's investments and other assets, less liabilities, by the number of Fund shares outstanding.

Custody fees/Credits

Custody fees are reduced based on the Fund's cash balances maintained with the custodian. The amount is disclosed as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.

Federal income taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code available to regulated investment companies and, in the manner provided therein, distributes substantially all its taxable income, as well as any net realized gain on sales of investments and foreign currency transactions reportable for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Fund paid no federal income taxes and no federal income tax provision was required.


16



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements, continued (Unaudited)

Expenses

General expenses of the Trust are allocated to the Fund and the other series of the Trust based upon relative net assets or other expense allocation methodologies determined by the nature of the expense. Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged to the Fund.

Foreign capital gains taxes

Gains in certain countries may be subject to foreign taxes at the fund level, at rates ranging from 10%-15%. The Fund accrues for such foreign taxes on net realized and unrealized gains at the appropriate rate for each jurisdiction.

Distributions to shareholders

Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.

Indemnification

In the normal course of business, the Trust on behalf of the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and that provide general indemnities. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims against the Fund. Also under the Trust's organizational documents, the trustees and officers of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities that may arise out of their duties to the Trust. However, based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss due to these warranties and indemnities to be remote.

3.  Federal Tax Information

The tax character of distributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows:

    December 31, 2010  
Distributions paid from:  
Ordinary Income*   $ 1,632,499    

 

* For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions, if any, are considered ordinary income distributions.

The following capital loss carryforwards, determined as of December 31, 2010, may be available to reduce taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code:

Year of
Expiration
  Capital Loss
Carryforwards
 
2017   $ 23,440,437    

 

Capital loss carryforwards that were utilized for the Fund during the year ended December 31, 2010 were, $10,275,226.

Management is required to determine whether a tax position of the Fund is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized by the Fund is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Management is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. However, management's conclusions may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, new tax laws, regulations, and administrative interpretations (including relevant court decisions). The Fund's federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

4.  Transactions With Affiliates

CWAM is a wholly owned subsidiary of Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (Columbia Management), which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (Ameriprise Financial). CWAM furnishes continuing investment supervision to the Fund and is responsible for the overall management of the Fund's business affairs.

CWAM receives a monthly advisory fee based on the Fund's average daily net assets at the following annual rates:

Average Daily Net Assets   Annual Fee Rate  
Up to $500 million     0.80 %  
$500 million and over     0.78 %  

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the annualized effective investment advisory fee rate was 0.80% of the Fund's average daily net assets.

Through April 30, 2012, CWAM has contractually agreed to reimburse the Fund to the extent that ordinary operating expenses (exclusive of brokerage commissions, interest, taxes and extraordinary expenses, but inclusive of custodian charges relating to overdrafts, if any), after giving effect to any balance credits from the Fund's custodian, exceed an annual percentage of 1.35% of average daily net assets on an annualized basis. There was no reimbursement to the Fund for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

CWAM provides administrative services and receives an administration fee from the Fund at the following annual rates.

Wanger Advisors Trust Aggregate
Average Daily Net Assets of the Trust
  Annual Fee Rate  
Up to $4 billion     0.05 %  
$4 billion to $6 billion     0.04 %  
$6 billion to $8 billion     0.03 %  
$8 billion and over     0.02 %  

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the annualized effective administration fee rate was 0.05% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Columbia Management provides certain sub-administrative services to the Fund.

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. (CMID), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, serves as the Fund's distributor and principal underwriter.

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp. (CMIS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, provides shareholder services to the Fund and contracted with Boston Financial Data Services (BFDS) to serve as subtransfer agent. For its services, the Fund pays CMIS a monthly fee at the annual rate of $21.00 per open account. CMIS also receives reimbursement from the Fund for certain out-of-pocket expenses. The arrangement with BFDS has been continued by CMIS.

Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are also officers of CWAM. The Trust makes no direct payments to its officers and trustees who are affiliated with CWAM.

The Board of Trustees has appointed a Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust in accordance with federal securities regulations. The Fund, along with other affiliated funds, pays its pro-rata share of the expenses associated with the Office of the Chief Compliance Officer. These expenses are disclosed separately as "Chief compliance officer expenses" in the Statement of Operations.

The Trust offers a deferred compensation plan for its independent trustees. Under that plan, a trustee may elect to defer all or a portion of his or her compensation. Amounts deferred are retained by the Trust and may represent an unfunded obligation of the Trust. The value of amounts deferred is determined by reference to the change in value of Class Z shares of one or more series of Columbia Acorn Trust or a money market fund as specified by the trustee. Benefits under the deferred compensation plan are payable when the trustee ceases to be a member of the Board of Trustees.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Fund engaged in purchase and sales transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common directors/trustees, and/or common officers. Those


17



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements, continued (Unaudited)

purchase and sale transactions complied with provisions of Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and were $- and $599,560, respectively.

5.  Borrowing Arrangements

The Trust participates in a $150 million credit facility, along with another Trust managed by CWAM, which was entered into to facilitate portfolio liquidity. Under the facility, interest is charged to each participating fund based on its borrowings at a rate per annum equal to the higher of Federal Funds Rate or Overnight LIBOR plus 1.25%. In addition, a commitment fee of 0.125% per annum of the unutilized line of credit is accrued and apportioned among the participating funds based on their relative net assets. The commitment fee is included in "Other expenses" in the Statement of Operations. No amounts were borrowed by the Fund under this facility during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Trust enters into this line of credit for one year durations. The Trust has secured the line of credit for the entire year of 2011.

6.  Fund Share Transactions

Proceeds and payments on Fund shares as shown in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets are in respect of the following numbers of shares:

    Six months ended
June 30, 2011
  Year ended
December 31, 2010
 
Shares sold     360,162       1,613,837    
Shares issued in reinvestment
of dividend distributions
    245,977       74,306    
Less shares redeemed     (1,160,853 )     (1,485,474 )  
Net increase (decrease) in shares outstanding     (554,714 )     202,669    

 

7.  Investment Transactions

The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales other than short-term obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $48,088,075 and $81,442,460, respectively.

8.  Information Regarding Pending and Settled Legal Proceedings

In June 2004, an action captioned John E. Gallus et al. v. American Express Financial Corp. and American Express Financial Advisors Inc. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege that they are investors in several American Express Company (now known as legacy RiverSource) mutual funds and they purport to bring the action derivatively on behalf of those funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The plaintiffs allege that fees allegedly paid to the defendants by the funds for investment advisory and administrative services are excessive. The plaintiffs seek remedies including restitution and rescission of investment advisory and distribution agreements. The plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (the District Court). In response to defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, the District Court dismissed one of plaintiffs' four claims and granted plaintiffs limited discovery. Defendants moved for summary judgment in April 2007. Summary judgment was granted in the defendants' favor on July 9, 2007. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (the Eighth Circuit) on August 8, 2007. On April 8, 2009, the Eighth Circuit reversed summary judgment and remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. On August 6, 2009, defendants filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court (the Supreme Court), asking the Supreme Court to stay the District Court proceedings while the Supreme Court considers and rules in a case captioned Jones v. Harris Associates, which involves issues of law similar to those presented in the Gallus case. On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jones v. Harris Associates, and on April 5, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuit's decision in the Gallus case and remanded the case to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On June 4, 2010, the Eighth Circuit remanded the Gallus case to the District Court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On December 9, 2010, the District Court reinstated its July 9, 2007 summary judgment order in favor of the defendants. On January 10, 2011, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eight Circuit. In response to the plaintiffs' opening appellate brief filed on March 18, 2011, the defendants filed a response brief on May 4, 2011 with the Eighth Circuit. The plaintiffs filed a reply brief on May 26, 2011.

In December 2005, without admitting or denying the allegations, American Express Financial Corporation (AEFC, which is now known as Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (Ameriprise Financial)), entered into settlement agreements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Minnesota Department of Commerce (MDOC) related to market timing activities. As a result, AEFC was censured and ordered to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and various Minnesota laws. AEFC agreed to pay disgorgement of $10 million and civil money penalties of $7 million. AEFC also agreed to retain an independent distribution consultant to assist in developing a plan for distribution of all disgorgement and civil penalties ordered by the SEC in accordance with various undertakings detailed at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/ia-2451.pdf. Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have cooperated with the SEC and the MDOC in these legal proceedings, and have made regular reports to the RiverSource, Seligman and Threadneedle funds' Boards of Directors/Trustees.

Ameriprise Financial and certain of its affiliates have historically been involved in a number of legal, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, including routine litigation, class actions, and governmental actions, concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of their business activities. Ameriprise Financial believes that the Funds are not currently the subject of, and that neither Ameriprise Financial nor any of its affiliates are the subject of, any pending legal, arbitration or regulatory proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds. Ameriprise Financial is required to make 10-Q, 10-K and, as necessary, 8-K filings with the SEC on legal and regulatory matters that relate to Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. Copies of these filings may be obtained by accessing the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

There can be no assurance that these matters, or the adverse publicity associated with them, will not result in increased fund redemptions, reduced sale of fund shares or other adverse consequences to the Funds. Further, although we believe proceedings are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds, these proceedings are subject to uncertainties and, as such, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other relief that could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of Ameriprise Financial.


18




Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

[Excerpt from:]

Wanger Advisors Trust

Management Fee Evaluation of the Senior Officer

Prepared Pursuant to the New York Attorney General's
Assurance of Discontinuance

May 2011


19



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Introduction

The New York Attorney General's Assurance of Discontinuance ("Order") entered into by Columbia Management Advisors, LLC ("CMA") and Columbia Management Distributors, Inc., ("CMDI") in February 2005, allows CMA to manage or advise a mutual fund only if the trustees of the fund appoint a "Senior Officer" to perform specified duties and responsibilities. Among these responsibilities is "managing the process by which proposed management fees (including but not limited to, advisory fees) to be charged the [funds] are negotiated so that they are negotiated in a manner which is at arms' length and reasonable and consistent with this Assurance of Discontinuance."

The Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust (collectively, the "Trusts") and each series thereof (the "Acorn funds," "WAT funds" or collectively, the "Funds") are overseen by the same Board of Trustees ("Board"). The Order provides that this Board must determine the reasonableness of proposed "management fees" by using either an annual competitive bidding process supervised by the Senior Officer or Independent Fee Consultant, or by obtaining "an annual independent written evaluation prepared by or under the direction of the Senior Officer or the Independent Fee Consultant."

"Management fees" are only part of the costs and expenses paid by mutual fund shareholders. Fund expenses can vary depending upon the class of shares held but usually include: (1) advisory fees to compensate analysts and portfolio managers for stock research and portfolio management, as well as the cost of operating a trading desk; (2) administrative expenses incurred to prepare registration statements and tax returns, calculate the funds' net asset values, maintain effective compliance procedures and perform recordkeeping services; (3) transfer agency costs for establishing accounts, accepting and disbursing funds, as well as overseeing trading in fund shares; (4) custodial expenses incurred to hold the securities purchased by the funds; and (5) distribution expenses, including commissions paid to brokers that sell the fund shares to investors. "Management fees" consist of (1) and (2), but not the other services.

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("CWAM"), is the adviser to the Funds, and at present is wholly owned by Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise"). The name Columbia Management or Columbia, is used to refer to the group of entities that manage or provide services to funds bearing the brand name "Columbia." These entities include Columbia Management Investment Advisers, ("CMIA"), the successor entity to CMA, Columbia Management Investment Services, Inc. ("CMIS") and Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. ("CMID"), the successor entity to CMDI. The Columbia asset management business, formerly owned by Bank of America Corporation ("Bank of America"), is now owned by Ameriprise.

The Change of Ownership

On September 29, 2009, Bank of America entered into a Purchase Agreement with Ameriprise providing for, among other things, the sale of CWAM to Ameriprise and the acquisition by Ameriprise of certain assets of Columbia. The sale closed on May 1, 2010. A new advisory agreement is required under these circumstances. In advance of that closing, Columbia and Ameriprise proposed that the Trusts continue, in substance, the then existing advisory agreement governing portfolio management, and the administration services agreement governing certain administration and clerical services. They proposed no material changes to these agreements, no change in services and no changes in fee levels, only those changes necessary to effect the change of ownership. The Board of Trustees approved the new advisory agreements, and on May 27, 2010, shareholders voted to approve them too. The investment management team responsible for the Funds remained with CWAM following the Ameriprise acquisition.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") effectively bars an increase in management fees for two years following a change in ownership of a fund's advisor (other than for bona fide additional investment advisory services); the purpose of this prohibition is to preclude management from financing the purchase through increased advisory fees. Ameriprise has represented to the Board that it intends to comply with these restrictions, and does not seek increased management fees at this time. Rather, Ameriprise seeks only to renew the advisory and related agreements on their existing terms.

Requirements of the Order

The Order applies to any successor to substantially all the assets of CMDI and CMA. Thus, it applies to CMIA and CMID as successors to CMA and CMDI. Under the Order, a fee evaluation must precede the execution of new or the extension of existing advisory and administration services agreements. The existing agreements continue in effect until July 31, 2011.

In conformity with the terms of the Order and past evaluations, this Evaluation addresses only the advisory and administration contracts, and does not extend to the Funds' underwriting and transfer agency agreements.

According to the Order, the Senior Officer's evaluation must consider a number of factors. These factors parallel the standard set forth in the Gartenberg case. They are following:

(1)  Management fees (including components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of CWAM for like services;

(2)  Management fees (including any components thereof) charged by other mutual fund companies for like services;

(3)  Costs to CWAM and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit;

(4)  Profit margins of CWAM and its affiliates from supplying such services;

(5)  Possible economies of scale as the Funds grow larger; and

(6)  The nature and quality of CWAM's services, including the performance of each Fund.

In 2004, the Boards of the two Trusts, then separate groups, each appointed me Senior Officer under the Order. They also determined not to pursue a competitive bidding process and instead, charged me with the responsibility of evaluating the Funds' proposed advisory and administration fee contracts with CWAM in conformity with the requirements of the Order. In discharging their responsibilities, the independent Trustees have also consulted independent, outside counsel. The Board has asked that I prepare this Evaluation.


20



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Scope of this Evaluation

This Evaluation is qualified in two respects. First, assessing such factors as cost of service, profitability, projected economies of scale, and expected quality of service, involves, at present, a significant element of uncertainty. Ameriprise and Columbia hope to effect cost savings by virtue of the increased scale of their operations. The integration of the two organizations is not, however, complete at this time, so the anticipated benefits are impossible to quantify now and hence cannot effectively be weighed in assessing the reasonableness of the proposed management fee. Profitability data is, to some extent, based on pro forma financial statements. At the same time, Ameriprise and Columbia have assured the Board that the Funds will not suffer diminished services as a result of the combination, nor do they propose to change the fee levels set forth in the existing advisory and administration services agreements. The upshot is that the Fund shareholders will, if the advisory agreements are renewed and asset levels do not decrease, pay no more than they do now, but it is too early to determine whether the change in ownership will result in material changes in the calculus of assessing the fairness of the management fee. Of necessity this must be left to future evaluations.

A second consideration concerns the new funds recently approved by the Board of Trustees. Earlier this year, CWAM and Ameriprise proposed two new Acorn funds: Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund ("Acorn Emerging Markets"), and Columbia Acorn European Fund ("Acorn European"). I issued a fee evaluation in February 2011 addressing the management fees proposed for those new funds. In March 2011, the Board approved amendments to the advisory and other agreements necessary to launch the new funds. They have not yet, however, been offered. Consequently, there is nothing to add here to the evaluation done in February, so this Evaluation does not address those funds.

Process and Independence

The objectives of the Order are to ensure the independent evaluation of the management fees paid by the Funds as well as to insure that all relevant factors are considered. In my view, this contract process has been conducted at arms-length and with independence in gathering, considering and evaluating all relevant data. At the outset of the process, the Trustees sought and obtained from Ameriprise and Columbia a comprehensive compilation of data regarding Fund performance and expenses, adviser profitability, and other information. The Trustees, acting through their Contract Committee evaluated this information thoroughly, and met often to discuss it. Performance and expense data was obtained from both Morningstar and Lipper, the leading consultants in this area. The rankings prepared by Morningstar and Lipper were independent and prepared in conformity with the methodologies employed by those organizations. Counsel for the Funds and the Independent Trustees considered, as did I, the terms and conditions of the proposed contracts.

My evaluation of the advisory contracts was shaped, as it has been in the past, by my experience as Chief Compliance Officer of the Trusts ("CCO"). As CCO, I report solely to the Board and have no reporting obligation to, or employment relationship with, Ameriprise or its affiliates. I have commented on compliance matters in evaluating the quality of service provided by CWAM.

This Report, its supporting materials and the data contained in other materials submitted to the Contract Committee, in my view, provide a thorough factual basis upon which the Board, in consultation with independent counsel as it deems appropriate, may conduct management fee negotiations that are in the best interests of the Funds' shareholders.

The Fee Reductions Mandated under the Order

Under the terms of the Order, Columbia agreed to secure certain management fee reductions for the mutual funds advised by its affiliate investment advisers. In some instances, breakpoints were also established. Although neither CWAM nor the Trusts was a party to the Order, CWAM offered and the Board accepted certain advisory fee reductions during 2005. By the terms of the Order, these fees could not be increased before November 30, 2009, and, in fact, have not been increased since. As a result of the Ameriprise acquisition, the Investment Company Act precludes any increases in management fees before May 2012 (other than for bona fide additional investment advisory services). Therefore, CWAM and Ameriprise propose the continuation of the contracts and management fees as they now exist; no increases in these fees are sought, and no reductions offered.

Conclusions

My review of the data and other material above leads to the following conclusions with respect to the factors identified in the Order.

A.  Fund Performance

The Domestic Funds: The Acorn Fund has achieved good performance over the past five years, and excellent results over longer periods. Acorn Select and Wanger Select have enjoyed better than average investment returns over the past five years, but have suffered reversals in more recent periods. Both funds expose investors to greater relative risk than the other domestic Funds. Acorn USA and its parallel, Wanger USA are the weakest performers, falling behind their benchmark and peer medians over one and five years. Thermostat is unique and therefore difficult to assess, but has outperformed its benchmark and now enjoys strong rankings from Morningstar.

The International Funds: The international Funds have delivered excellent results over the past five years, and done so while exposing investors to less risk than competing funds. They have also outperformed their benchmarks during this period, but recent results have been more restrained. The international Funds enjoy positive "alpha," confirming the value of their portfolio managers.

B.  Management Fees Relative to Peers

There is significant variance in management fee rankings across the Funds. Acorn International is the only fund that was ranked in the top quartile by both Morningstar and Lipper. The other Acorn funds tend to fall around the medians identified by one or the other service. The WAT funds are uniformly more expensive than their peers.


21



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

C.  Management Fees Relative to Institutional Account and Other Mutual Fund Accounts

CWAM's focus is on its mutual funds. The few institutional accounts it does manage vary in rate structures. Some pay advisory fees commensurate with or higher than the Acorn and WAT funds. In a few instances, however, institutional accounts pay lower advisory fees than do the Acorn funds. One such institutional account is significant in size and has been under CWAM's management for over 33 years. Furthermore, CWAM performs sub-advisory services for mutual funds managed by Ameriprise affiliates, CWAM's parent organization, at rates that are lower than those paid by the parallel Acorn funds, though sub-advisory services usually differ from those necessary for the full support of a mutual fund.

D.  Administrative Services

The Acorn and WAT funds' administrative fees are within the range of fees charged by competitors, but these rankings suffer from a lack of uniformity in the scope of services encompassed by the fee. CWAM provides excellent administrative support for all the Funds.

E.  Costs and Benefits to CWAM and its Affiliates

CWAM's direct costs do not appear excessive. Overhead and indirect costs allocated to CWAM by its parent organization, however, are significant and have varied considerably over the years. CWAM's affiliates report operating losses and although the allocations leading to these losses may bear closer scrutiny, Ameriprise affiliates do not appear to enjoy excessive "fall out" benefits from CWAM's advisory agreement with the Funds. CWAM continues, however, to enjoy substantial benefits from the use of "soft dollar" payments for research.

F.  Profitability

CWAM's profit margins may be in the upper range of its competitors, but peer profitability is difficult to assess given differences in products, operations and other factors. Furthermore, there is limited public information available with regard to the profitability of investment advisers.

G.  Economies of Scale

Economies of scale do exist at CWAM, and the Board has instituted breakpoints that reduce fess as assets increase. Though asset levels have recovered from recent lows, sustained asset growth will be required to trigger additional fee reductions under the current schedule.

H.  Nature and Quality of Service

This category includes a variety of considerations that are difficult to quantify, yet can have a significant bearing on the performance of the Acorn and WAT funds. Several areas merit comment: (1) CWAM has maintained its investment management capacity and an experienced staff; and (2) CWAM has a reasonably designed compliance program that protects shareholders.

I.  Process

In my opinion, the process of negotiating an advisory contract for the Funds has been conducted thoroughly and at arms' length. The Board's Contract Committee has sought and obtained extensive data bearing on the reasonableness of the management fees proposed by CWAM. The Trustees have sufficient information to evaluate management's proposal, and negotiate contract terms that are in the best interests of fund shareholders.

Recommendation

According to Morningstar, Acorn USA and Wanger USA have delivered performance below peer medians for the past one and five years, while imposing management fees that exceed them. Management has fashioned various initiatives to improve performance, and the Trustees should continue to monitor both Funds closely to assess the impact of those initiatives.


22



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement

Wanger Advisors Trust (the "Trust") has an investment advisory agreement (the "Advisory Agreement") with Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("CWAM") under which CWAM manages the Wanger Funds (the "Funds"). More than 75% of the trustees of the Trust (the "Trustees") are comprised of persons who have no direct or indirect interest in the Advisory Agreement and are not "interested persons" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act")) of the Trust (the "Independent Trustees"). The Trustees oversee the management of each Fund and, as required by law, determine at least annually whether to continue the Advisory Agreement for each Fund.

The Contract Committee of the Board (the "Committee"), which is comprised solely of Independent Trustees, makes recommendations to the Board regarding any proposed continuation of the Advisory Agreement. After the Committee has made its recommendations, the full Board determines whether to approve continuation of the Advisory Agreement. The Board also considers matters bearing on the Advisory Agreement at its various meetings throughout the year, meets at least quarterly with CWAM's portfolio managers and receives monthly reports from CWAM on the performance of the Funds.

In connection with their most recent consideration of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund, the Committee and all Trustees received and reviewed a substantial amount of information provided by CWAM, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ("Columbia Management") and Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise"), in response to written requests from the Independent Trustees and their independent legal counsel. Throughout the process, the Trustees had numerous opportunities to ask questions of and request additional materials from CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise.

During each meeting at which the Committee or the Independent Trustees considered the Advisory Agreement, they met in executive session with their independent legal counsel. The Committee also met with representatives of CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise on several occasions. In all, the Committee convened formally on five separate occasions to consider the continuation of the Advisory Agreement. The Board and/or some or all of the Independent Trustees met on other occasions to receive the Committee's status reports, receive presentations from CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise representatives, and to discuss outstanding issues. In addition, the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board, also comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees, reviewed the performance of the Funds and presented its findings to the Board and the Committee throughout the year. The Compliance Committee also provided information to the Committee with respect to relevant matters.

The Trustees reviewed the Advisory Agreement, as well as certain information obtained through CWAM's, Columbia Management's and Ameriprise's responses to independent legal counsel's questionnaires. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the Management Fee Evaluation dated May 2011 (the "Fee Evaluation") prepared by the Trust's chief compliance officer, senior vice president and general counsel, who also serves as the Trust's "Senior Officer," as contemplated by the Assurance of Discontinuance dated February 9, 2005 among former affiliates of CWAM and the Office of the New York Attorney General. A summary of the Fee Evaluation is included in this report.

The materials reviewed by the Committee and the Trustees included, among other items, (i) information on the investment performance of each Fund and of independently selected peer groups of funds and of the Funds' performance benchmarks over various time periods, (ii) information on each Fund's advisory fees and other expenses, including information comparing the Fund's fees and expenses to those of peer groups of funds and information about any applicable expense limitations and fee breakpoints, (iii) data on sales and redemptions of Fund shares, and (iv) information on the profitability to CWAM and Ameriprise, as well as potential "fall-out" or ancillary benefits that CWAM and its affiliates may receive as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Trustees also considered other information such as (i) CWAM's financial condition, (ii) each Fund's investment objective and strategy, (iii) the size, education and experience of CWAM's investment staff and its use of technology, external research and trading cost measurement tools, (iv) the portfolio manager compensation framework, (v) the allocation of the Funds' brokerage, and the use of "soft" commission dollars to pay for research products and services, and (vi) the resources devoted to, and the record of compliance with, the Funds' investment policies and restrictions, policies on personal securities transactions and other compliance policies.

At a meeting held on June 8, 2011, upon recommendations of the Committee, the Board of Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreement.

In considering the continuation of the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees' determination to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement are discussed below.

Nature, quality and extent of services. The Trustees reviewed the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates to the Funds under the Advisory Agreement, taking into account the investment objective and strategy of each Fund and knowledge gained from meetings with management, which were held on at least a quarterly basis. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the available resources and key personnel of CWAM and its affiliates, especially those providing investment management services to the Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Funds by CWAM and its affiliates, including: managing the execution of portfolio transactions and selecting broker-dealers for those transactions; monitoring adherence to the Funds' investment restrictions; producing shareholder reports; providing support services for the Board and committees of the Board; communicating with shareholders; serving as the Funds' administrator; and overseeing the activities of the Funds' other service providers, including monitoring for compliance with various policies and procedures as well as applicable securities laws and regulations.

The Trustees concluded that the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates to each Fund under the Advisory Agreement were appropriate for the Funds and that the Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services by CWAM. They also concluded that CWAM currently had sufficient personnel, with appropriate education and experience, to serve the Funds effectively, and that the firm had demonstrated its continuing ability to attract and retain well-qualified personnel. In addition, they took note of the quality of CWAM's compliance record.

Performance of the Funds. The Trustees received and considered detailed performance information at various meetings of the Board, the Committee and the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board throughout the year. They reviewed information comparing each Fund's performance with that of its benchmark(s) and with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups as identified by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper") and Morningstar, Inc. ("Morningstar"). The Trustees evaluated the performance of the Funds over various time periods, including over the one-, three- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010. The Trustees also considered peer performance rankings based on a rolling five-year period.

The Trustees noted that the international Funds have delivered excellent results over the past five years, and have done so while exposing investors to less risk than competing funds, according to Morningstar. They considered that the domestic Funds have had mixed results. Wanger Select had better than average results measured against its peers over the five-year period but underperformed over the one- and three-year periods ending December 31, 2010. Wanger Select outperformed its benchmark for the five-year period but underperformed over the three-year period and equaled its benchmark for the one-year period ending December 31, 2010. Wanger USA outperformed its peer group medians over the three-year period but underperformed its peer group medians over the one- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010 and also underperformed its benchmark over the same one-, three- and five-year periods. The Trustees noted that the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board concluded that Fund performance was generally satisfactory, except that Wanger USA's performance had slipped below the Lipper and Morningstar medians during the past year. The Trustees considered that CWAM had taken and was taking a number of corrective steps with respect to Wanger USA's underperformance and that the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board was monitoring the Fund's performance.


23



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement

The Trustees concluded that, although past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, the strong overall longer-term performance record of the Funds was an important factor in their evaluation of the quality of services provided by CWAM under the Advisory Agreement for each Fund.

Costs of Services and Profits Realized by CWAM. At various Committee and Board meetings, the Trustees examined detailed information on the fees and expenses of each Fund in comparison to information for comparable funds provided by Lipper and Morningstar. The Trustees reviewed data from Lipper and Morningstar and noted that all Funds other than Wanger International Select had lower total net operating expenses than their respective Lipper peer group medians and only Wanger USA had total net operating expenses above its Morningstar peer group median. As noted in the Fee Evaluation, the actual advisory fees paid by Wanger Select and Wanger USA were higher than the median advisory fee of the Funds' Morningstar peer groups and the actual advisory fee paid by each Fund was higher than the median advisory fee of each Fund's Lipper peer group. The Trustees reviewed the observations in the Fee Evaluation and noted that the Funds are assessed by Morningstar and Lipper in relation to peers selected only from the variable annuity universe.

The Trustees also considered that Ameriprise represented and agreed that advisory fees would not be raised for the two years following the close of its acquisition of CWAM (May 1, 2010) pursuant to Section 15(f) of the 1940 Act.

The Trustees also reviewed the advisory fee rates charged by CWAM for managing other investment companies (including the Columbia Acorn Funds), sub-advised funds and other institutional separate accounts, as detailed in the Fee Evaluation. The Trustees noted that the Funds' advisory fees were generally comparable to the Columbia Acorn Funds' advisory fees at the same asset levels. The Trustees also examined CWAM's institutional separate account fees for various investment strategies; in some cases those fees were higher than the advisory fees charged to the Funds, and in a few instances the fees were lower. The Trustees noted that CWAM performs significant additional services for the Funds that it does not provide to sub-advised funds or non-mutual fund clients, including administrative services, oversight of the Funds' other service providers, Trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in servicing the Funds, CWAM assumes many legal risks that it does not assume in servicing many of its non-fund clients.

The Trustees concluded that the rates of advisory fees payable to CWAM were reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services to be provided. The Trustees also concluded that the Funds' overall expense ratios were reasonable, considering the quality of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates and the investment performance of the Funds.

The Trustees reviewed the analysis of the historic profitability of CWAM in serving as each Fund's investment adviser and of CWAM and its affiliates in their relationships with each Fund. The Committee and Trustees met on several occasions with representatives from Ameriprise to discuss its methodologies for calculating profitability and allocating costs. They considered that Ameriprise calculated profitability and allocated costs on a contract-by-contract and fund-by-fund basis. The Trustees also considered the methodology used by CWAM and Ameriprise in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers and the competitive market for investment management talent. The Trustees were also provided with profitability information from Lipper and Strategic Insight, which compared CWAM's profitability to other similar investment advisers in the mutual fund industry. The Trustees concluded that CWAM's and its affiliates' profits were within a reasonable range of those of competitors with similar business models. The Trustees discussed, however, that profitability comparisons among fund managers may not always be meaningful due to the lack of consistency in data, small number of publicly-owned managers, and the fact that profitability of any investment manager is affected by numerous factors, including its particular organizational structure, the types of funds and other accounts managed, other lines of business, expense allocation methodology, capital structure and cost of capital.

Economies of Scale. At various Committee and Board meetings and other informal meetings, the Trustees considered information about the extent to which CWAM realizes economies of scale in connection with an increase in Fund assets. The Trustees also discussed the potential for Fund sales growth. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedule for each Fund includes breakpoints in the rate of fees at various asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee structure of each Fund was reflective of a sharing between CWAM and the Funds of economies of scale.

Other Benefits to CWAM. The Trustees also reviewed benefits that accrue to CWAM and its affiliates from their relationships with the Funds, as outlined in the Fee Evaluation. They noted that the Funds' transfer agency services are performed by Columbia Management Investment Services Corp., an affiliate of Ameriprise, which receives compensation from the Funds for its services provided. They considered that an affiliate of Ameriprise, Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. ("CMID"), serves as the Funds' distributor under a distribution agreement and receives no fees for its services. In addition, Columbia Management provides sub-administration services to the Funds. The Committee received information regarding the profitability of each Fund agreement with CWAM affiliates. The Committee and the Board also reviewed information about and discussed the capabilities of each affiliated entity in performing its duties.

The Trustees considered other ways that the Funds and CWAM may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other. For example, the Trustees considered CWAM's use of commissions paid by each Fund on its portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain research products and services benefiting the Funds and/or other clients of CWAM. The Committee reviewed CWAM's annual "soft dollar" report and met with representatives from CWAM to review CWAM's soft dollar spending. The Committee also considered that the Compliance Committee of the Board regularly reviewed third-party prepared reports that evaluated the quality of CWAM's execution of the Funds' portfolio transactions. The Trustees determined that CWAM's use of the Funds' "soft" commission dollars to obtain research products and services was consistent with current regulatory requirements and guidance. They also concluded that CWAM benefits from the receipt of proprietary research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Funds, and that the Funds benefit from CWAM's receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of CWAM.

After full consideration of the above factors, as well as other factors that were instructive in evaluating the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously concluded that the continuation of the Advisory Agreement was in the best interest of each Fund. On June 8, 2011, the Trustees approved continuation of the Advisory Agreement through July 31, 2012.


24



Wanger Select 2011 Semiannual Report

Columbia Wanger Funds

Trustees

Laura M. Born
Chair of the Board

Steven N. Kaplan
Vice Chair of the Board

Michelle L. Collins
Maureen M. Culhane
Margaret M. Eisen
John C. Heaton
Charles P. McQuaid
Allan B. Muchin
David J. Rudis
David B. Small
Ralph Wanger (Trustee Emeritus)

Officers

Charles P. McQuaid
President

Ben Andrews
Vice President

Robert A. Chalupnik
Vice President

Michael G. Clarke
Assistant Treasurer

Joseph F. DiMaria
Assistant Treasurer

P. Zachary Egan
Vice President

John M. Kunka
Assistant Treasurer

Joseph C. LaPalm
Vice President

Bruce H. Lauer
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer

Louis J. Mendes III
Vice President

Robert A. Mohn
Vice President

Christopher J. Olson
Vice President

Christopher O. Petersen
Assistant Secretary

Scott R. Plummer
Assistant Secretary

Linda K. Roth-Wiszowaty
Assistant Secretary

Robert P. Scales
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President and
General Counsel

Transfer Agent,
Dividend Disbursing Agent

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp.
P.O.Box 8081
Boston, Massachusetts
02266-8081

Distributor

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc.
225 Franklin Street
Boston, Massachusetts
02110

Investment Adviser

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC
227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000
Chicago, Illinois 60606
1-888-4-WANGER
(1-888-492-6437)

Legal Counsel to the Funds

Perkins Coie LLP
Washington, DC

Legal Counsel to the Independent Trustees

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois

This report, including the schedules of investments and financial statements, is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Wanger Advisors Trust.

A description of the Fund's proxy voting policies and procedures and a copy of the Fund's voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 are available (i) on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov, and (ii) without charge, upon request, by calling 888-492-6437.

The Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund's Form N-Q is available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Pubic Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330. The Fund's complete portfolio holdings are disclosed at www.columbiamanagement.com approximately 30 days after each month-end.


25




Columbia Wanger Funds

© 2011 Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved.

C-1452 C (8/11) 122622




Wanger USA

2011 Semiannual Report

Not FDIC insuredNo bank guaranteeMay lose value




  Wanger USA

  2011 Semiannual Report

    Table of Contents

2   Understanding Your Expenses  
3   Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook  
6   Performance Review  
8   Statement of Investments  
16   Statement of Assets and Liabilities  
16   Statement of Operations  
17   Statement of Changes in Net Assets  
18   Financial Highlights  
19   Notes to Financial Statements  
22   Management Fee Evaluation of the Senior Officer  
26   Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement  

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (CWAM) is one of the leading global small- and mid-cap equity managers in the United States with 40 years of small- and mid-cap investment experience. As of June 30, 2011, CWAM managed $35.8 billion in assets, and is the investment adviser to Wanger USA, Wanger International, Wanger Select and Wanger International Select (together, the Columbia Wanger Funds) and the Columbia Acorn Family of Funds.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a mutual fund carefully before investing. For a free prospectus, which contains this and other important information about the Fund, contact your financial adviser or insurance company or contact 1-888-4-WANGER. Read the prospectus carefully before investing.

An important note: Columbia Wanger Funds are available for purchase through variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies offered by the separate accounts of participating insurance companies and qualified pension or retirement plans.

The views expressed in "Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook" and in the Performance Review reflect the current views of the respective authors. These views are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict so actual outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. These views are subject to change at any time based upon economic, market or other conditions and the respective parties disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Columbia Wanger Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any particular Columbia Wanger Fund. References to specific company securities should not be construed as a recommendation or investment advice.




Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Understanding Your Expenses

As a Fund shareholder, you incur three types of costs. There are transaction costs, which generally include sales charges on purchases and may include redemption or exchange fees. There are also ongoing costs, which generally include investment advisory fees and other Fund expenses. Lastly, there may be additional fees or charges imposed by the insurance company that sponsors your variable annuity product. The information on this page is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

Analyzing your Fund's expenses

To illustrate these ongoing costs, we have provided an example and calculated the expenses paid by investors in the Fund during the period. The information in the following table is based on an initial, hypothetical investment of $1,000, which is invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period. Expense information is calculated two ways and each method provides you with different results. The amount listed in the "Actual" column is calculated using actual operating expenses and total return for the Fund. The amount listed in the "Hypothetical" column assumes that the return each year is 5% before expenses and then applies the Fund's actual expense ratio for the period to the hypothetical return. You should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate either your actual account balance at the end of the period or the expenses you paid during the period. See "Compare with other funds" for details on using the hypothetical data.

Estimating your actual expenses

To estimate the expenses that you actually paid over the period, first you will need your account balance at the end of the period.

1.  Divide your ending account balance by $1,000. For example, if an account balance was $8,600 at the end of the period, the result would be 8.6.

2.  In the section of the table below titled "Expenses paid during the period," you will find a dollar amount in the column labeled "Actual." Multiply this amount by the result from step 1. Your answer is an estimate of the expenses you paid on your account during the period.

January 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011

    Account value at the
beginning of the period ($)
  Account value at the
end of the period ($)
  Expenses paid during
the period ($)
  Fund's annualized
expense ratio (%)*
 
    Actual   Hypothetical   Actual   Hypothetical   Actual   Hypothetical   Actual  
Wanger USA     1,000.00       1,000.00       1,111.10       1,019.98       5.08       4.86       0.97    

 

*Expenses paid during the period are equal to the Fund's annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, then multiplied by the number of days in the Fund's most recent fiscal half-year and divided by 365.

Had the investment adviser not waived fees or reimbursed a portion of expenses, account value at the end of the period would have been reduced.

It is important to note that the expense amounts shown in the table are meant to highlight only ongoing costs of investing in the Fund. Expenses paid during the period do not include any insurance charges imposed by your insurance company's separate account. The hypothetical example provided is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds whose shareholders may incur transaction costs.

Compare with other funds

Since all mutual funds are required to include the same hypothetical calculations about expenses in shareholder reports, you can use this information to compare the ongoing cost of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare the 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples of other funds. As you compare hypothetical examples of other funds, it is important to note that hypothetical examples are meant to highlight the ongoing cost of investing in a fund and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges, redemption fees or exchange fees that may be incurred by shareholders of other funds. Expenses paid during the period do not include any insurance charges imposed by your insurance company's separate accounts.


2



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Shale Gas Returns, Transforming the Energy Outlook

Just five to seven years ago, it was widely believed that North American natural gas resources were being rapidly depleted. Today, the outlook appears to be very much improved thanks to the ingenuity of a few individuals and a process that should provide natural gas for decades to come.

In 1825, some 34 years before Colonel Edwin Drake1 drilled the first oil well in Titusville, Pennsylvania, William Aaron Hart drilled the first natural gas well, in shale located in Fredonia, New York. By August of that year, five structures in the village were illuminated by natural gas and by November there were 36 gas lights in the village. In 1857, Preston Barmore, the superintendent of the Fredonia Natural Gas Co., was not satisfied with the production from a 122 foot well so he exploded crevices of rock in the well, increasing the supply of gas. Within a few years, the village had 150 gas lights.2

Plenty of natural gas was subsequently found in sandstone formations under impermeable rock, in similar formations as oil, or accompanied by oil. Extracting this natural gas was less costly than drilling for gas in shale, so shale exploration all but ended. Millions of miles of gas pipelines were built, and demand for natural gas grew.3 U.S.-marketed production rose to 1 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of natural gas by 1923, and has ranged from 16.9 to 22.6 TCF since 1973.4 Natural gas is used for heating and manufacturing, and is a feedstock for fertilizers, plastics and chemicals.

Recent Natural Gas Shortages

In 2004, Julian Darley wrote High Noon for Natural Gas, The New Energy Crisis. He reviewed Hubbert's Peak, a theory named after the geologist who researched oil finding and production curves and then correctly predicted that U.S. oil production would peak around 1970. Darley applied Hubbert's Peak to natural gas data and concluded that North American gas production had also peaked and was likely to plunge.

Darley wrote, "The United States and Canada are entering a natural gas crisis ...North American supply is simply no longer able to meet desired consumption."5 He added, "...the worst immediate problem confronting the United States (and Canada) is not oil, but natural gas. It is a natural gas shortage that could seriously interrupt the U.S. economy..."6 Darley noted that the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) made enormous upward revisions for production of natural gas from shale, tight sands and coal beds, but he believed such gains would fail to occur. Instead, importing of liquefied natural gas (LNG) would have to be an interim solution. But LNG, Darley stated, had safety and security risks. Geopolitically, relying on imported LNG would also be problematic, as Russia and Iran had the largest reserves of natural gas.

Darley believed that the 300-plus new natural gas-fired electric generating stations, built between 1980 and 2003 at a cost of $100 billion, were huge mistakes. The power companies had apparently reviewed a 1999 National Petroleum Council report that stated North American natural gas supplies would grow. Darley labeled that report as an "example of the kind of cornucopian delusion that characterizes many in government and most in industry, who believe in nothing but economics and the miracle of capitalism with its unlimited ability to find substitutes for everything."7

Darley thought that with worldwide Peak Oil imminent and North American natural gas production plunging, energy was to become scarce, and the industrial revolution would unwind. He advocated that people should be able to obtain their daily needs within walking distance from where they lived. His long-term solution was to depopulate the earth, such that mankind no longer mined the planet and consumed only the energy that the sun regularly provides. At one child per woman, the population of the earth would be back to one billion in about one hundred years.

Domestic natural gas production fell between 2001 and 2005 and prices increased between 2002 and 2008.8 Most major oil companies and analysts agreed that natural gas production in North America was peaking, and that the U.S. would need substantial imports of LNG. I remember going to an energy conference in early 2006 where this view was widespread. Darley's nightmare scenario seemed to be coming true.

Back in the Gas Fields

George Mitchell has been called the Father of the Barnett Natural Gas Field, located in and around Fort Worth, Texas. Over an 18-year period beginning in 1981, his company, Mitchell Energy and Development, experimented with fracturing gas-bearing shale that is located between 6,000 and 14,000 feet below the surface. Geologists knew that shale had lots of pores and the ability to store natural gas, but since pores in shale are rarely interconnected, gas flows poorly through shale. Initial attempts to extract this gas were costly, and production was not economical. Eventually, the company developed a "light sand frac" method that was effective and used less fluid. The combination of reduced costs and rising natural gas prices made such drilling profitable. Mitchell drilled many wells at the Barnett field, producing far more natural gas than most people expected.9

Mitchell needed more funding and sold his company to Devon Energy, a larger, independent producer. Devon had expertise in an additional technology, horizontal drilling, which tilted drill holes at angles or sideways once they hit pay dirt. More gas-bearing shale was consequently exposed to the well. With this added technology, the company drilled 55 wells in the Barnett field in 2003 and the shale gas boom began.10 Some 13,500 gas wells have been drilled in the Barnett field since 199711 and the Barnett field accounted for 6% of total natural gas production in the United States in 2010.12

Drilling at other shale gas formations has also jumped. U.S. shale gas production increased


3



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

12-fold in the last decade and currently accounts for about 25% of U.S. natural gas production.13 With greater production, natural gas wellhead prices halved from 2008 to 2010. In its yearly forecast in 2010, the EIA doubled its estimate of U.S. shale gas production for 2035 and predicts shale gas production will hit 46% of U.S. consumption that year.14 Imports will drop from 11% of natural gas consumption in 2009 to 1%.15 With "economics and the miracle of capitalism"16 we won't need to revert to Darley's dark ages any time soon. The EIA also believes shale gas totaling at least six-times U.S. reserves is recoverable in at least 32 other countries.17

Energy Mix

In 2009, Robert Hefner published The Grand Energy Transition. The book provides perspectives on past and future sources and uses of energy. Hefner believes that energy usage naturally transitions from solids (wood and coal) to liquids (oil) and then to gasses (natural gas, wind and hopefully nuclear fusion). He sees newer fuels as superior to older ones, with each new fuel facilitating new technologies, improvements in the environment and higher living standards.

The transition to coal from wood powered the industrial revolution and allowed millions of acres of forests to regrow. Coal then fell from 80% of the world energy market in 1900 to about 28% currently. Oil ascended to 48% of the world's energy by 1973, displacing much dirty coal and revolutionizing transportation via the introduction of automobiles and airplanes. Oil subsequently dropped to about 36% of world energy consumption. Natural gas has risen from 10% of the world's energy in 1950 to 24% currently.18

Believing in global warming, Hefner notes that the transition from wood to coal to oil to natural gas slashed carbon content and increased hydrogen content of fuels with each transition. Since burning carbon creates carbon dioxide (CO2), the primary greenhouse gas, and burning hydrogen creates water, the natural transitions from solids to liquids to gasses slow global warming. Burning natural gas creates 44% less CO2 than burning coal and 29% less than burning oil. Burning natural gas also emits about 80% less nitrogen oxides, over 90% lower particulates and over 99% less sulfur dioxide than coal or oil.19

Under an earlier belief that the U.S. was running out of natural gas, the Natural Gas Policy Act (NPGA) and the Fuel Use Act were passed in 1978. The NGPA immediately deregulated prices for gas produced from deep wells and phased out other price controls.20 The Fuel Use Act mandated the phase out of natural gas for electric generation and restricted its industrial uses. Prices for deep gas jumped, but so did drilling. Production grew, and with demand depressed by the Fuel Use Act, prices then collapsed. There was an excess supply of natural gas, known as the "gas bubble," until the year 2000.

Hefner believes the 1978 laws slowed the natural transition from coal and oil to natural gas. As a result of the Fuel Use Act, some 100,000 megawatts of coal-fired electric generating capacity was built in the United States through 1989 that has emitted 15 billion metric tons of CO2 into the atmosphere.21 Hefner believes that the construction of the coal burning plants, not the natural gas burning plants, was the big mistake.

Hefner subscribes to Peak Oil occurring soon, but sees many decades of abundant and relatively cheap natural gas. Hence, he predicts the grand energy transition to natural gas will continue, and he believes natural gas will be a bridge fuel to renewable energy and possibly nuclear fusion. Natural gas complements wind energy quite well, as gas-burning electric plants can quickly power up when the wind slows.

Some 12 million vehicles worldwide are powered by natural gas. Of that number, there are estimated to be 110,000 natural gas-powered vehicles in the United States,22 including thousands of trucks serving the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles,23 more than 11,000 buses24 and approximately 12,000 Honda Civic GX cars.25 These vehicles burn natural gas currently priced at one-third of the energy equivalent price of oil. Hefner believes that half the autos in the United States should be powered by natural gas, and the dirtiest, coal-burning electric plants should be replaced by natural gas plants. Yearly gas consumption would rise by 13 TCF, but could be met by increased shale gas production.26

Investment Implications

We believe that innovations in producing gas from shale have indeed transformed the U.S. energy outlook. We profitably invested in some of the pioneers of shale gas though, with the current glut of natural gas, the stocks now look less attractive. Supplies of gas may remain high in the short term as some unprofitable drilling persists in order to keep lease rights. Over time, the low prices will likely result in reduced drilling and more constrained supplies. When this happens, natural gas prices should rise to a level where drilling and production are moderately profitable. We continue to look for suppliers and service companies participating in shale gas production. Some shale oil fields are now being developed, including the Bakken field in North Dakota and Canada and the Eagle Ford field in Texas. At this point, we don't think there will be enough shale oil production to revolutionize the oil market, but we do believe we have found some attractive stocks participating in those developments.

Charles P. McQuaid
President and Chief Investment Officer
Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC


4



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

The information and data provided in this analysis are derived from sources that we deem to be reliable and accurate. These views are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict so actual outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. The views/opinions expressed in this essay are those of the author and not of the Columbia Wanger Funds Board, are subject to change at any time based upon economic, market or other conditions, may differ from views expressed by other Columbia Management associates and the respective parties disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Columbia Wanger Fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any particular Columbia Wanger Fund.

1  Colonel Edwin Drake was an American oil driller, credited with being the first to drill for oil in the United States.

2  Lash, Eileen and Gary, "The Early History of Natural Gas, Kicking Down the Well," The SUNY Fredonia Shale Research Institute, June 3, 2011, http://www.fredonia.edu/shaleinstitute/history.asp.

3  U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), http://www.eia.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/ngpipeline/index.html.

4  EIA data, including imports primarily from Canada, states the U.S. has been using about 23 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of gas a year, including about 6.6 TCF for industrial purposes. www.eia.gov.

5  Darley, Julian, High Noon for Natural Gas, The New Energy Crisis, (White River Junction, Vermont, Chelsea Green Publishing Company 2004) p. 13.

6  Ibid., p. 2.

7  Ibid., p. 79-80.

8  According to EIA data, domestic natural gas production fell from 20.6 TCF in 2001 to 18.9 TCF in 2005. Average annual wellhead prices rose from $3 to $5 in 2002-2003 to $6 to $8 from 2006-2008. www.eia.gov.

9  Airhart, Marc, "The Father of the Barnett Natural Gas Field," http://geology.com/research/barnett-shale-father.html.

10  Yergin, Daniel, "Stepping on the Gas," Wall Street Journal, April 2, 2011.

11  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

12  U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas, Development in the United States: A Primer," April 2009, p. ES-1, http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/naturalgas_general/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

13  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

14  Lomax, Simon, "Shale-Gas Output May Double by 2035, Reducing Energy Imports, U.S. Says," Bloomberg, December 16, 2010, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-16/natural-gas-production-from-shale-may-double-by-35-u-s-agency-forecasts.html.

15  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

16  Darley, Julian, op. cit., p. 79-80.

17  Presentation for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), "Shale Gas and the Outlook for U.S. Natural Gas Markets and Global Gas Resources," June 21, 2011, http://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/newell_06212011.pdf.

18  Hefner III, Robert A., "The Grand Energy Transition," (Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2009) p. 27.

19  U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, "Modern Shale Gas, Development in the United States: A Primer," April 2009, p. 5, http://fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/publications/naturalgas_general/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf

20  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 120-121. Having been an independent explorer for natural gas, Hefner was well aware that gas existed in locations independently of oil. (He has been called the "Father of Deep Natural Gas" as his company drilled very deep wells finding only natural gas at very high pressure.) In the 1970s when geologists for major oil companies testified to Congress that the U.S. was running out of natural gas, Hefner dissented, believing that the shortage was caused by price controls in place since 1954. Price controls cause shortages of valuable commodities by boosting demand and restraining supplies.

21  Ibid., p. 122.

22  Natural Gas Vehicles of America, http://www.ngvc.org/mktplace/index.html. Accessed July 20, 2011.

23  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 201.

24  Natural Gas Vehicles of America, http://www.ngvc.org/mktplace/index.html. Accessed July 20, 2011.

25  Oberman, Mira, "The Greenest Car You've (Likely) Never Heard Of," Agence France-Presse, April 11, 2011.

26  Hefner III, Robert A., op. cit., p. 203.


5



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Performance Review Wanger USA

Robert A. Mohn
Portfolio Manager

Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Please visit columbiamanagement.com for performance updates for the most recent month-end.

Wanger USA gained 11.11% for the half year ended June 30, 2011, strongly outperforming its primary benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index, which was up 6.21%.

Winners for the half year came from a variety of sectors. IPG Photonics, a fiber laser manufacturer, dominates its market niche and nearly doubled sales versus the prior year. Its stock was up 130% for the first six-months of 2011. Active apparel retailer lululemon athletica also had strong revenue growth on ever-increasing awareness of the brand in the United States. Its stock was up 63% for the half year. Polycom, a provider of video conferencing equipment, finished the period with a 65% return. The company's business benefited from increased corporate adoption of video conferencing as well as recent stumbles by a close competitor.

Diamond Foods, a provider of nuts and snack foods, announced an agreement to purchase the Pringles brand from Procter & Gamble, a move that will transform Diamond into the second largest snack company in the world, behind Pepsi. The stock rose on the news and was up 44% for the half year.

On the downside, two names in the optical network equipment business fell due to revenue shortfalls. Finisar, a provider of optical sub-systems and components, was a big winner for the Fund last year but orders have slowed in 2011, leaving Finisar customers with excess inventory. Its stock was off 39% for the six months. Ixia sells telecom test equipment for optical networks and also suffered from a drop in orders. The company's stock fell 24% for the half year.

Other laggards included Gaylord Entertainment, an owner of convention hotels. Gaylord's performance was hurt by a drop in the occupancy rate at its Washington DC hotel, which sent the stock down 17% for the half year. Women's specialty retailer Talbots was down 61% on declining sales. Micromet, a next-generation antibody technology firm, fell 30%. TriQuint Semiconductor, a manufacturer of radio frequency semiconductors for mobile phones and other wireless devices, disappointed as some handset manufacturers deferred new product launches, sending the company's stock down 15% for the half year.

These days, many investors are obsessing over a seeming epidemic of ominous macroeconomic troubles and their potential solutions. Scary stuff like national debt crises, Mediterranean defaults, stubbornly high unemployment, and double-dipping housing prices dominate the news. But we believe that these issues are not as relevant to our philosophy of investing. We don't subscribe to the current fetish of investing based on macroeconomic factors (commonly referred to as "risk-on, risk-off" trading). Even in volatile, uncertain times like today, plenty of individual smaller cap companies are growing faster than their peers and possess bright long-term prospects. We spend our time and effort seeking out these kinds of businesses for your Fund. We'll leave the macro-dancing to the other guys.

Stocks of small- and mid-cap companies pose special risks, including possible illiquidity and greater price volatility than stocks of larger, more established companies.

Portfolio holdings are subject to change periodically and may not be representative of current holdings.

Fund's Positions in Mentioned Holdings

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

lululemon athletica     3.3 %  
IPG Photonics     3.1    
Polycom     1.5    
Gaylord Entertainment     1.4    
Diamond Foods     1.0    
Finisar     0.5    
Micromet     0.3    
TriQuint Semiconductor     0.2    
Ixia     0.2    
Talbots     0.1    


6



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Growth of a $10,000 Investment in Wanger USA

May 3, 1995 (inception date) through June 30, 2011

Performance data shown represents past performance and is not a guarantee of future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data shown. Performance results reflect any fee waivers or reimbursements of Fund expenses by the investment adviser and/or any of its affiliates. Absent these fee waivers and/or expense reimbursement arrangements, performance results would have been lower. For daily and most recent month-end performance updates, please call 1-888-4-WANGER.

This graph compares the results of $10,000 invested in Wanger USA on May 3, 1995 (the date the Fund began operations) through June 30, 2011, to the Russell 2000 Index, with dividends and capital gains reinvested. Although the index is provided for use in assessing the Fund's performance, the Fund's holdings may differ significantly from those in the index.

Top 10 Holdings

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

1. Informatica
Enterprise Data Integration Software
  3.3
 
%  
2. lululemon athletica
Premium Active Apparel Retailer
  3.3
 
 
3. IPG Photonics
Fiber Lasers
  3.1
 
 
4. FMC Technologies
Oil & Gas Wellhead Manufacturer
  3.0
 
 
5. Ametek
Aerospace/Industrial Instruments
  3.0
 
 
6. Nordson
Dispensing Systems for Adhesives & Coatings
  2.8
 
 
7. Atwood Oceanics
Offshore Drilling Contractor
  2.2
 
 
8. Mettler Toledo
Laboratory Equipment
  2.2
 
 
9. Micros Systems
Information Systems for Hotels, Restaurants & Retailers
  2.2
 
 
10. tw telecom
Fiber Optic Telephone/Data Services
  2.1
 
 

Top 5 Sectors

As a percentage of net assets, as of 6/30/11

Information     33.0 %  
Consumer Goods & Services     17.7    
Industrial Goods & Services     14.3    
Finance     11.1    
Energy & Minerals     9.5    

 

Results as of June 30, 2011

    2nd quarter   Year to date   1 year   5 years   10 years  
Wanger USA     2.38 %     11.11 %     46.11 %     5.56 %     7.31 %  
Russell 2000 Index*     -1.61       6.21       37.41       4.08       6.27    
Lipper Small-Cap
Growth Funds
Variable
Underlying Index
    0.28       10.07       43.38       5.58       5.71    

 

NAV as of 6/30/11: $34.31

* The Fund's primary benchmark.

Performance numbers reflect all Fund expenses but do not include any fees and expenses imposed under your variable annuity or life insurance policy or qualified pension or retirement plan. If performance included the effect of these additional charges, it would be lower.

The Fund's annual operating expense ratio is 0.97%. The annual operating expense ratio is as stated in the Fund's prospectus that is current as of the date of this report. Differences in expense ratios disclosed elsewhere in this report may result from including fee waivers and reimbursements as well as different time periods used in calculating the ratios.

All results shown assume reinvestment of distributions and do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the sale of Fund shares.

The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. The Lipper Small-Cap Growth Funds Variable Underlying Index is an equally weighted representation of the 30 largest variable insurance underlying funds in the Lipper Small-Cap Growth Funds Variable Underlying Classification. Indexes are not managed and do not incur fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Lipper Inc., a widely respected data provider in the industry, calculates an average total return (assuming reinvestment of distributions) for mutual funds with investment objectives similar to those of the Fund. Lipper makes no adjustment for the effect of sales loads.

Portfolio characteristics and holdings are subject to change periodically and may not be representative of current characteristics and holdings.


7




Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger USA

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
        Equities – 99.6%      
    Information – 33.0%  
    Business Software – 9.7%  
  533,000     Informatica (a)
Enterprise Data Integration Software
  $ 31,143,190    
  413,000     Micros Systems (a)
Information Systems for Hotels, Restaurants & Retailers
    20,530,230    
  221,000     ANSYS (a)
Simulation Software for Engineers & Designers
    12,082,070    
  106,000     Concur Technologies (a)
Web Enabled Cost & Expense Management Software
    5,307,420    
  170,000     Blackbaud
Software & Services for Non-profits
    4,712,400    
  132,000     Ariba (a)
Cost Management Software
    4,550,040    
  35,000     Quality Systems
IT Systems for Medical Groups & Ambulatory Care Centers
    3,055,500    
  163,000     SPS Commerce (a)
Supply Chain Management Software Delivered via the Web
    2,899,770    
  59,000     Blackboard (a)
Education Software
    2,560,010    
  64,000     NetSuite (a)
End to End IT Systems Solutions Delivered Over the Web
    2,508,800    
  64,000     Advent Software (a)
Asset Management & Trading Systems
    1,802,880    
      91,152,310    
    Instrumentation – 5.3%  
  394,000     IPG Photonics (a)
Fiber Lasers
    28,647,740    
  122,000     Mettler Toledo (a)
Laboratory Equipment
    20,577,740    
      49,225,480    
    Semiconductors & Related Equipment – 4.7%  
  1,111,000     Atmel (a)
Microcontrollers, Radio Frequency &
Memory Semiconductors
    15,631,770    
  488,000     Microsemi (a)
Analog/Mixed-signal Semiconductors
    10,004,000    
  520,000     ON Semiconductor (a)
Mixed-signal & Power Management Semiconductors
    5,444,400    
  445,000     Entegris (a)
Semiconductor Materials Management Products
    4,503,400    
  226,000     Monolithic Power Systems (a)
High Performance Analog & Mixed-signal
Integrated Circuits (ICs)
    3,484,920    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  203,000     TriQuint Semiconductor (a)
Radio Frequency Semiconductors
  $ 2,068,570    
  205,000     Pericom Semiconductor (a)
Interface Integrated Circuits (ICs) &
Frequency Control Products
    1,832,700    
  157,000     Applied Micro Circuits (a)
Communications Semiconductors
    1,391,020    
      44,360,780    
    Telephone and Data Services – 3.4%  
  970,000     tw telecom (a)
Fiber Optic Telephone/Data Services
    19,914,100    
  89,200     AboveNet
Metropolitan Fiber Communications Services
    6,285,032    
  1,120,000     PAETEC Holding (a)
Telephone/Data Services for Business
    5,364,800    
      31,563,932    
    Computer Hardware & Related Equipment – 2.7%  
  358,000     II-VI (a)
Laser Optics & Specialty Materials
    9,164,800    
  106,000     Amphenol
Electronic Connectors
    5,722,940    
  110,000     Netgear (a)
Networking Products for Small Business & Home
    4,809,200    
  100,000     Zebra Technologies (a)
Bar Code Printers
    4,217,000    
  48,000     Nice Systems – ADR (Israel) (a)
Audio & Video Recording Solutions
    1,745,280    
      25,659,220    
    Telecommunications Equipment – 2.2%  
  214,000     Polycom (a)
Video Conferencing Equipment
    13,760,200    
  237,800     Finisar (a)
Optical Sub-systems & Components
    4,287,534    
  133,000     Ixia (a)
Telecom Network Test Equipment
    1,702,400    
  135,000     Infinera (a)
Optical Networking Equipment
    932,850    
      20,682,984    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
8



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger USA

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Computer Services – 1.4%  
  333,000     ExlService Holdings (a)
BPO (Business Process Outsourcing)
  $ 7,692,300    
  450,000     RCM Technologies (a)
Technology & Engineering Services
    2,407,500    
  375,500     Hackett Group (a)
IT Integration & Best Practice Research
    1,911,295    
  92,000     Acxiom (a)
Database Marketing Services
    1,206,120    
      13,217,215    
    Gaming Equipment & Services – 1.3%  
  264,000     Bally Technologies (a)
Slot Machines & Software
    10,739,520    
  42,000     WMS Industries (a)
Slot Machine Provider
    1,290,240    
      12,029,760    
    Contract Manufacturing – 0.7%  
  135,000     Plexus (a)
Electronic Manufacturing Services
    4,699,350    
  165,000     Sanmina-SCI (a)
Electronic Manufacturing Services
    1,704,450    
      6,403,800    
    Financial Processors – 0.5%  
  91,000     Global Payments
Credit Card Processor
    4,641,000    
    Mobile Communications – 0.3%  
  82,000     SBA Communications (a)
Communications Towers
    3,131,580    
    Business Information & Marketing Services – 0.3%  
  291,200     Navigant Consulting (a)
Financial Consulting Firm
    3,054,688    
    Internet Related – 0.3%  
  575,000     TheStreet.com
Financial Information Websites
    1,765,250    
  142,363     US Auto Parts Network (a)
Auto Part Online Retailer
    1,090,500    
      2,855,750    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Radio – 0.1%  
  333,900     Salem Communications
Radio Stations for Religious Programming
  $ 1,198,701    
  30,900     Spanish Broadcasting System (a)
Spanish Language Radio Stations
    21,630    
      1,220,331    
    TV Broadcasting – 0.1%  
  522,000     Entravision Communications (a)
Spanish Language TV & Radio Stations
    965,700    
        Total Information     310,164,530    
    Consumer Goods & Services – 17.7%  
    Retail – 7.6%  
  275,000     lululemon athletica (a)
Premium Active Apparel Retailer
    30,750,500    
  256,000     Abercrombie & Fitch
Teen Apparel Retailer
    17,131,520    
  129,000     Shutterfly (a)
Internet Photo-centric Retailer
    7,407,180    
  476,000     Saks (a)
Luxury Department Store Retailer
    5,316,920    
  382,000     Pier 1 Imports (a)
Home Furnishing Retailer
    4,419,740    
  264,000     Chico's FAS
Women's Specialty Retailer
    4,020,720    
  315,000     Talbots (a)(b)
Women's Specialty Retailer
    1,052,100    
  116,229     Gaiam
Healthy Living Catalogs & E-Commerce
    577,658    
  6,000     The Fresh Market (a)
Specialty Food Retailer
    232,080    
      70,908,418    
    Travel – 3.4%  
  449,700     Gaylord Entertainment (a)
Convention Hotels
    13,491,000    
  659,500     Avis Budget Group (a)
Second Largest Car Rental Company
    11,270,855    
  400,000     Hertz (a)
Largest U.S. Rental Car Operator
    6,352,000    
  12,000     HomeAway (a)
Vacation Rental Online Marketplace
    464,400    
      31,578,255    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
9



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger USA

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Furniture & Textiles – 1.7%  
  590,000     Knoll
Office Furniture
  $ 11,841,300    
  166,000     Herman Miller
Office Furniture
    4,518,520    
      16,359,820    
    Casinos & Gaming – 1.0%  
  328,000     Pinnacle Entertainment (a)
Regional Casino Operator
    4,887,200    
  115,000     Penn National Gaming (a)
Regional Casino Operator
    4,639,100    
      9,526,300    
    Apparel – 1.0%  
  93,500     Warnaco Group (a)
Global Branded Apparel Manufacturer
    4,885,375    
  153,945     True Religion Apparel (a)
Premium Denim
    4,476,721    
      9,362,096    
    Food & Beverage – 1.0%  
  117,000     Diamond Foods (b)
Snack Foods & Culinary Ingredients
    8,931,780    
    Consumer Goods Distribution – 0.7%  
  232,000     Pool
Distributor of Swimming Pool Supplies & Equipment
    6,915,920    
    Other Consumer Services – 0.7%  
  163,000     Lifetime Fitness (a)
Sport & Fitness Club Operator
    6,505,330    
    Other Durable Goods – 0.3%  
  85,000     Jarden
Branded Household Products
    2,933,350    
    Leisure Products – 0.3%  
  83,000     Thor Industries
RV & Bus Manufacturer
    2,393,720    
    Restaurants – 0.0%  
  17,700     Bravo Brio Restaurant Group (a)
Upscale Casual Italian Restaurants
    432,411    
        Total Consumer Goods & Services     165,847,400    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Industrial Goods & Services – 14.3%  
    Machinery – 11.5%  
  631,500     Ametek
Aerospace/Industrial Instruments
  $ 28,354,350    
  480,200     Nordson
Dispensing Systems for Adhesives & Coatings
    26,338,970    
  290,000     Donaldson
Industrial Air Filtration
    17,597,200    
  319,000     Pentair
Pumps & Water Treatment
    12,874,840    
  297,300     ESCO Technologies
Automatic Electric Meter Readers
    10,940,640    
  128,000     MOOG (a)
Motion Control Products for Aerospace,
Defense & Industrial Markets
    5,570,560    
  111,000     Oshkosh (a)
Specialty Truck Manufacturer
    3,212,340    
  57,000     Kennametal
Consumable Cutting Tools
    2,405,970    
  13,078     HEICO
FAA Approved Aircraft Replacement Parts
    519,981    
      107,814,851    
    Industrial Materials & Specialty Chemicals – 1.4%  
  71,000     Albemarle
Refinery Catalysts & Other Specialty Chemicals
    4,913,200    
  187,000     Drew Industries
RV & Manufactured Home Components
    4,622,640    
  150,000     Albany International
Paper Machine Clothing & Advanced Textiles
    3,958,500    
      13,494,340    
    Steel – 0.7%  
  320,400     GrafTech International (a)
Industrial Graphite Materials Producer
    6,494,508    
    Electrical Components – 0.6%  
  104,000     Acuity Brands
Commercial Lighting Fixtures
    5,801,120    
    Water – 0.1%  
  121,000     Mueller Water Products
Fire Hydrants, Valves & Ductile Iron Pipes
    481,580    
        Total Industrial Goods & Services     134,086,399    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
10



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger USA

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Finance – 11.1%  
    Banks – 5.2%  
  610,000     Valley National Bancorp
New Jersey/New York Bank
  $ 8,302,100    
  107,000     SVB Financial Group (a)
Bank to Venture Capitalists
    6,388,970    
  253,000     Lakeland Financial
Indiana Bank
    5,631,780    
  284,000     MB Financial
Chicago Bank
    5,464,160    
  368,000     TCF Financial
Great Lakes Bank
    5,078,400    
  161,194     Hancock Holding
Gulf Coast Bank
    4,993,790    
  271,000     Associated Banc-Corp
Midwest Bank
    3,766,900    
  666,200     First Busey
Illinois Bank
    3,524,198    
  300,260     Pacific Continental
Pacific Northwest Bank
    2,747,379    
  97,700     Sandy Spring Bancorp
Baltimore/D.C. Bank
    1,757,623    
  504,451     Guaranty Bancorp (a)
Colorado Bank
    675,964    
  119,582     Green Bankshares (a)
Tennessee Bank
    313,305    
      48,644,569    
    Finance Companies – 2.5%  
  138,000     World Acceptance (a)
Personal Loans
    9,048,660    
  207,000     McGrath Rentcorp
Temporary Space & IT Rentals
    5,812,560    
  151,000     CAI International (a)
International Container Leasing
    3,119,660    
  160,000     H&E Equipment Services (a)
Heavy Equipment Leasing
    2,238,400    
  71,000     Aaron's
Rent to Own
    2,006,460    
  30,000     Textainer Group Holdings
Top International Container Leasor
    922,200    
      23,147,940    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Brokerage & Money Management – 1.3%  
  206,000     SEI Investments
Mutual Fund Administration & Investment Management
  $ 4,637,060    
  444,000     MF Global (a)
Futures Broker
    3,436,560    
  85,000     Eaton Vance
Specialty Mutual Funds
    2,569,550    
  90,900     Investment Technology Group (a)
Electronic Trading
    1,274,418    
      11,917,588    
    Insurance – 1.1%  
  200,000     Leucadia National
Insurance Holding Company
    6,820,000    
  19,000     Enstar Group (a)
Insurance/Reinsurance & Related Services
    1,985,310    
  69,000     Tower Group
Commercial & Personal Lines Insurance
    1,643,580    
      10,448,890    
    Savings & Loans – 1.0%  
  447,000     ViewPoint Financial
Texas Thrift
    6,168,600    
  142,000     Berkshire Hills Bancorp
Northeast Thrift
    3,179,380    
  52,011     Kaiser Federal Financial Group
Los Angeles Savings & Loan
    640,776    
      9,988,756    
        Total Finance     104,147,743    
    Energy & Minerals – 9.5%  
    Oil Services – 6.1%  
  638,000     FMC Technologies (a)
Oil & Gas Wellhead Manufacturer
    28,576,020    
  474,100     Atwood Oceanics (a)
Offshore Drilling Contractor
    20,922,033    
  95,000     Bristow
Largest Provider of Helicopter Services to
Offshore Oil & Gas Producers
    4,846,900    
  116,000     Hornbeck Offshore (a)
Supply Vessel Operator in U.S. Gulf of Mexico
    3,190,000    
      57,534,953    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
11



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger USA

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Oil & Gas Producers – 2.6%  
  92,000     SM Energy
Oil & Gas Producer
  $ 6,760,160    
  81,000     Rosetta Resources (a)
Oil & Gas Producer Exploring in South Texas & Montana
    4,174,740    
  215,000     Houston American Energy (b)
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production in Colombia
    3,897,950    
  145,000     Northern Oil & Gas (a)(b)
Small E&P Company in North Dakota Bakken
    3,211,750    
  83,000     Swift Energy (a)
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Company
    3,093,410    
  174,000     Quicksilver Resources (a)
Natural Gas & Coal Steam Gas Producer
    2,568,240    
  19,800     Oasis Petroleum (a)
Oil Producer in North Dakota
    587,664    
      24,293,914    
    Mining 0.8%  
  66,000     Core Laboratories (Netherlands)
Oil & Gas Reservoir Consulting
    7,361,640    
  100,000     Augusta Resource (a)
U.S. Copper/Molybdenum Mine
    463,000    
      7,824,640    
        Total Energy & Minerals     89,653,507    
    Health Care – 8.7%  
    Biotechnology & Drug Delivery – 4.8%  
  254,000     BioMarin Pharmaceutical (a)
Biotech Focused on Orphan Diseases
    6,911,340    
  318,200     Seattle Genetics (a)
Antibody-based Therapies for Cancer
    6,529,464    
  126,000     Onyx Pharmaceuticals (a)
Commercial-stage Biotech Focused on Cancer
    4,447,800    
  462,000     Isis Pharmaceuticals (a)
Biotech Pioneer in Anti-sense Drugs
    4,231,920    
  104,000     InterMune (a)
Drugs for Pulmonary Fibrosis & Hepatitis C
    3,728,400    
  384,000     NPS Pharmaceuticals (a)
Orphan Drugs & Healthy Royalties
    3,628,800    
  162,000     Auxilium Pharmaceuticals (a)
Biotech Focused on Niche Disease Areas
    3,175,200    
  450,000     Micromet (a)
Next-generation Antibody Technology
    2,583,000    

 

Number of
Shares
      Value  
  455,000     Chelsea Therapeutics (a)
Biotech Focused on Rare Diseases
  $ 2,320,500    
  42,000     United Therapeutics (a)
Biotech Focused on Rare Diseases
    2,314,200    
  255,000     Nabi Biopharmaceuticals (a)
Biotech Focused on Vaccines
    1,371,900    
  243,000     Idenix Pharmaceuticals (a)
Developer of Drugs for Infectious Diseases
    1,215,000    
  128,000     Anthera Pharmaceuticals (a)
Biotech Focused on Cardiovascular, Cancer & Immunology
    1,045,760    
  130,000     Savient Pharmaceuticals (a) (b)
Biotech Focused on Severe Gout
    973,700    
  242,000     Array Biopharma (a)
Drugs for Cancer & Inflammatory Diseases
    542,080    
  738,060     Medicure – Warrants (a) (c)
Cardiovascular Biotech Company
    22    
  25,000     Locus Pharmaceuticals, Series A-1, Pfd. (a)(c)(d)        
  12,886     Locus Pharmaceuticals, Series B-1, Pfd. (a)(c)(d)
High Throughput Rational Drug Design
       
      45,019,086    
    Medical Equipment & Devices – 2.7%  
  218,000     Alexion Pharmaceuticals (a)
Biotech Focused on Orphan Diseases
    10,252,540    
  123,000     Sirona Dental Systems (a)
Manufacturer of Dental Equipment
    6,531,300    
  70,000     Gen-Probe (a)
Molecular In-vitro Diagnostics
    4,840,500    
  34,000     Idexx Laboratories (a)
Diagnostic Equipment & Services for Veterinarians
    2,637,040    
  76,000     Pacific Biosciences of California (a)
Genome Sequencing
    889,200    
      25,150,580    
    Medical Supplies – 0.7%  
  164,600     Cepheid (a)
Molecular Diagnostics
    5,701,744    
  29,000     Neogen (a)
Food & Animal Safety Products
    1,311,090    
      7,012,834    

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
12



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger USA

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

Number of
Shares
      Value  
    Pharmaceuticals – 0.4%  
  400,000     Akorn (a)
Develops, Manufactures & Sells Specialty Generic Drugs
  $ 2,800,000    
  103,400     Alimera Sciences (a)
Ophthalmogy-focused Pharmaceutical Company
    842,710    
      3,642,710    
    Health Care Services – 0.1%  
  100,000     Health Management Associates (a)
Non-urban Hospitals
    1,078,000    
        Total Health Care     81,903,210    
    Other Industries – 5.3%  
    Real Estate – 4.4%  
  503,000     Extra Space Storage
Self Storage Facilities
    10,728,990    
  469,600     BioMed Realty Trust
Life Science-focused Office Buildings
    9,035,104    
  935,000     Kite Realty Group
Community Shopping Centers
    4,656,300    
  102,000     Kilroy Realty
West Coast Office & Industrial Properties
    4,027,980    
  100,000     Corporate Office Properties
Office Buildings
    3,111,000    
  122,200     Dupont Fabros Technology
Technology-focused Office Buildings
    3,079,440    
  264,000     Education Realty Trust
Student Housing
    2,262,480    
  119,000     Associated Estates Realty
Multi-family Properties
    1,933,750    
  341,000     DCT Industrial Trust
Industrial Properties
    1,783,430    
  60,000     Summit Hotel Properties
Owner of Select Service Hotels
    681,000    
      41,299,474    
    Transportation – 0.9%  
  100,500     World Fuel Services
Global Fuel Broker
    3,610,965    
  134,487     Rush Enterprises, Class A (a)
Truck Sales & Services
    2,559,288    

 

Number of Shares
or Principal Amount
      Value  
  140,000     Heartland Express
Regional Trucker
  $ 2,318,400    
      8,488,653    
        Total Other Industries     49,788,127    
Total Equities
(Cost: $535,116,263) – 99.6%
    935,590,916    
Securities Lending Collateral – 0.5%      
  4,382,297     Dreyfus Government Cash
Management Fund (e)
(7 day yield of 0.00%)
    4,382,297    
Total Securities Lending Collateral
(Cost: $4,382,297)
    4,382,297    
Short-Term Obligation – 0.4%      
    Repurchase Agreement – 0.4%  
$ 3,614,000     Repurchase Agreement with Fixed
Income Clearing Corp., dated
6/30/11, due 7/01/11 at 0.01%,
collateralized by a U.S. Government
Agency obligation maturing 8/18/17,
market value $3,689,478 (repurchase
proceeds $3,614,001)
  $ 3,614,000    
Total Short-Term Obligation
(Cost: $3,614,000)
    3,614,000    
Total Investments
(Cost: $543,112,560) – 100.5% (f)
    943,587,213    
Obligation to Return Collateral for Securities
Loaned – (0.5)%
    (4,382,297 )  
Cash and Other Assets Less Liabilities – (0.0)%     (14,632 )  
Total Net Assets – 100.0%   $ 939,190,284    

 

Notes to Statement of Investments:

(a)  Non-income producing security.

(b)  All or a portion of this security was on loan at June 30, 2011. The total market value of Fund securities on loan at June 30, 2011 was $4,197,156.

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
13



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger USA

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

(c)  Denotes a restricted security, which is subject to restrictions on resale under federal securities laws. These securities are valued at a fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. At June 30, 2011, the market value of these securities amounted to $22 which represented less than 0.01% of total net assets.

  Additional information on these securities is as follows:


Security
  Acquisition
Dates
  Shares   Cost   Value  
Medicure – Warrants   12/22/06     738,060     $     $ 22    
Locus Pharmaceuticals,
Series A-1, Pfd.
  9/05/01     25,000       1,000,000          
Locus Pharmaceuticals,
Series B-1, Pfd.
  2/08/07     12,886       37,369          
            $ 1,037,369     $ 22    

 

(d)  Security has no value.

(e)  Investment made with cash collateral received from securities lending activity.

(f)  At June 30, 2011, for federal income tax purposes, the cost of investments was $543,112,560 and net unrealized appreciation was $400,474,653 consisting of gross unrealized appreciation of $440,334,953 and gross unrealized depreciation of $39,860,300.

  ADR = American Depositary Receipts

  At June 30, 2011, the Fund held investments in the following sectors:

Sector   Percentage
of
Net Assets
 
Information     33.0    
Consumer Goods & Services     17.7    
Industrial Goods & Services     14.3    
Finance     11.1    
Energy & Minerals     9.5    
Health Care     8.7    
Other Industries     5.3    
      99.6    
Securities Lending Collateral     0.5    
Short-Term Obligation     0.4    
Obligation to Return Collateral for Securities Loaned     (0.5 )  
Cash and Other Assets less Liabilities     (0.0 )*  
      100.0    

 

*  Rounds to less than 0.01%.

  Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund's investments, following the input prioritization hierarchy established by GAAP. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

•  Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

•  Level 2—prices determined using other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and others)

•  Level 3—prices determined using significant unobservable inputs where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable or less reliable (including management's own assumptions about the factors market participants would use in pricing an investment)

  The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

  Examples of the types of securities in which the Fund would typically invest and how they are classified within this hierarchy are as follows. Typical Level 1 securities include exchange traded domestic equities, mutual funds whose NAVs are published each day and exchange traded foreign equities that are not statistically fair valued. Typical Level 2 securities include exchange traded foreign equities that are statistically fair valued, forward foreign currency exchange contracts and short-term investments valued at amortized cost. Additionally, securities fair valued by the Valuation Committee of the Fund's Board of Trustees that rely on significant observable inputs are also included in Level 2. Typical Level 3 securities include any security fair valued by the Valuation Committee that relies on significant unobservable inputs.

  The following table summarizes the inputs used, as of June 30, 2011, in valuing the Fund's assets:

Investment Type   Quoted Prices
(Level 1)
  Other
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Total  
Equities  
Information   $ 310,164,530     $     $     $ 310,164,530    
Consumer Goods &
Services
    165,847,400                   165,847,400    
Industrial Goods &
Services
    134,086,399                   134,086,399    
Finance     104,147,743                   104,147,743    
Energy & Minerals     89,653,507                   89,653,507    
Health Care     81,903,188       22             81,903,210    
Other Industries     49,788,127                   49,788,127    
Total Equities     935,590,894       22             935,590,916    
Total Securities Lending
Collateral
    4,382,297                   4,382,297    
Total Short-Term
Obligation
          3,614,000             3,614,000    
Total Investments   $ 939,973,191     $ 3,614,022     $     $ 943,587,213    

 

  The Fund's assets assigned to the Level 2 input category are generally valued using a market approach, in which a security's value is determined through its correlation to prices and information from observable market transactions for similar or identical assets. Warrants which do not trade are valued as a percentage of the actively trading common stock using a model based on Black Scholes.

  Certain short-term obligations may be valued using amortized cost, an income approach which converts future cash flows to a present value based upon the discount or premium at purchase.

  There were no significant transfers of financial assets between levels 1 and 2 during the period.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
14



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Wanger USA

Statement of Investments (Unaudited), June 30, 2011

The following table reconciles asset balances for the six months ending June 30, 2011, in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining value:

Investments
in Securities
  Balance
as of
December 31,
2010
  Realized
Gain/(Loss)
  Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
  Purchases   Sales   Transfers
into
Level 3
  Transfers
out of
Level 3
  Balance
as of
June 30,
2011
 
Equities
Health Care
  $ 1,137     $     $ (1,137 )   $     $     $     $     $    

 

  The information in the above reconciliation table represents fiscal year to date activity for any securities identified as using Level 3 inputs at either the beginning or the end of the current fiscal period.

  The change in unrealized depreciation attributed to securities owned at June 30, 2011, which were valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) amounted to $(1,137). This amount is included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
15




Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Statement of Assets and Liabilities
June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Assets:  
Investments, at cost   $ 543,112,560    
Investments, at value
(including securities on loan of $4,197,156)
  $ 943,587,213    
Cash     299    
Receivable for:  
Investments sold     2,048,574    
Fund shares sold     347,023    
Securities lending income     6,047    
Dividends     346,959    
Expense reimbursement due from investment adviser     6,990    
Trustees' deferred compensation plan     96,932    
Other assets     3,595    
Total Assets     946,443,632    
Liabilities:  
Collateral on securities loaned     4,382,297    
Payable for:  
Investments purchased     340,886    
Fund shares repurchased     1,326,105    
Investment advisory fee     635,448    
Administration fee     36,968    
Transfer agent fee     63    
Trustees' fees     681    
Professional fees     40,672    
Custody fee     10,151    
Reports to shareholders     376,148    
Chief compliance officer expenses     3,269    
Trustees' deferred compensation plan     96,932    
Other liabilities     3,728    
Total Liabilities     7,253,348    
Net Assets   $ 939,190,284    
Composition of Net Assets:  
Paid-in capital   $ 522,227,839    
Accumulated net investment loss     (2,511,859 )  
Accumulated net realized gain     18,999,651    
Net unrealized appreciation on investments     400,474,653    
Net Assets   $ 939,190,284    
Fund Shares Outstanding     27,371,116    
Net asset value, offering price and redemption
price per share
  $ 34.31    

Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)

Investment Income:  
Dividends (net foreign taxes withheld of $4,950)   $ 2,076,336    
Securities lending income, net     34,538    
Interest income     710    
Total Investment Income     2,111,584    
Expenses:  
Investment advisory fee     3,967,628    
Administration fee     231,001    
Transfer agent fee     353    
Trustees' fees     26,783    
Custody fee     24,797    
Professional fees     56,906    
Chief compliance officer expenses (See Note 4)     18,230    
Other expenses (See Note 5)     216,769    
Total Expenses     4,542,467    
Advisory fee waiver (See Note 4)     (40,610 )  
Custody earnings credit     (2 )  
Net Expenses     4,501,855    
Net Investment Loss     (2,390,271 )  
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on
Investments:
 
Net realized gain on investments     23,108,635    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
on investments
    77,149,504    
Net Gain     100,258,139    
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations   $ 97,867,868    

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
16



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets:   (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2011
  Year Ended
December 31,
2010
 
Operations:  
Net investment loss   $ (2,390,271 )   $ (3,576,723 )  
Net realized gain (loss) on:  
Unaffiliated investments     23,108,635       146,415,741    
Affiliated investments (See Note 4)           (1,462,746 )  
Reimbursement from transaction costs (See Note 4)           19,197    
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:  
Unaffiliated investments     77,149,504       50,758,257    
Affiliated investments (See Note 4)           (2,077,908 )  
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations     97,867,868       190,075,818    
Distributions to Shareholders:  
From net realized gains     (78,451,985 )        
Share Transactions:  
Subscriptions     18,660,857       40,189,516    
Distributions reinvested     78,451,985          
Redemptions (See Note 4)     (88,762,216 )     (595,995,083 )  
Net Increase (Decrease) from Fund Share Transactions     8,350,626       (555,805,567 )  
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets     27,766,509       (365,729,749 )  
Net Assets:  
Beginning of period     911,423,775       1,277,153,524    
End of period   $ 939,190,284     $ 911,423,775    
Accumulated net investment loss at end of period   $ (2,511,859 )   $ (121,588 )  

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
17




Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Financial Highlights

    (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Year Ended December 31,  
Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007   2006  
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period   $ 33.86     $ 27.45     $ 19.30     $ 36.26     $ 36.36     $ 34.90    
Income from Investment Operations:  
Net investment loss (a)     (0.09 )     (0.10 )     (0.06 )     (0.07 )     (0.05 )(b)     (0.02 )  
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments     3.65       6.51       8.21       (13.16 )     1.91       2.71    
Total from Investment Operations     3.56       6.41       8.15       (13.23 )     1.86       2.69    
Less Distributions to Shareholders:  
From net investment income                                   (0.08 )  
From net realized gains     (3.11 )                 (3.73 )     (1.96 )     (1.15 )  
Total Distributions to Shareholders     (3.11 )                 (3.73 )     (1.96 )     (1.23 )  
Net Asset Value, End of Period   $ 34.31     $ 33.86     $ 27.45     $ 19.30     $ 36.26     $ 36.36    
Total Return (c)     11.11 %(d)(e)     23.35 %(e)     42.23 %     (39.68 )%     5.39 %     7.87 %  
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data:  
Net expenses before interest expense (f)     0.97 %(g)     0.97 %     0.98 %     0.96 %     0.95 %     0.95 %  
Interest expense           0.00 %(h)                       0.00 %(h)  
Interest expense waiver           0.00 %(h)                          
Net expenses (f)     0.97 %(g)     0.97 %     0.98 %     0.96 %     0.95 %     0.95 %  
Net investment loss (f)     (0.52 )%(g)     (0.35 )%     (0.29 )%     (0.26 )%     (0.15 )%     (0.07 )%  
Waiver/Reimbursement     0.01 %(g)     0.01 %                          
Portfolio turnover rate     4 %(d)     27 %     30 %     22 %     27 %     19 %  
Net assets, end of period (000s)   $ 939,190     $ 911,424     $ 1,277,154     $ 952,249     $ 1,688,040     $ 1,608,340    

 

(a)  Net investment loss per share was based upon the average shares outstanding during the period.

(b)  Net investment loss per share reflects special dividends. The effect of these dividends amounted to $0.08 per share.

(c)  Total return at net asset value assuming all distributions reinvested.

(d)  Not annualized.

(e)  Had the investment adviser and/or any of its affiliates not waived a portion of expenses, total return would have been reduced.

(f)  The benefits derived from custody fees paid indirectly had an impact of less than 0.01%.

(g)  Annualized.

(h)  Rounds to less than 0.01%.

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.
18




Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.  Nature of Operations

Wanger USA (the Fund), is a series of Wanger Advisors Trust (the Trust), an open-end management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. The investment objective of the Fund is to seek long-term capital appreciation. The Fund is available only for allocation to certain life insurance company separate accounts established for the purpose of funding qualified and non-qualified variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies and may also be offered directly to certain types of pension plans and retirement arrangements.

2.  Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Security valuation

Securities of the Fund are valued at market value or, if a market quotation for a security is not readily available or is deemed not to be reliable because of events or circumstances that have occurred between the market quotation and the time as of which the security is to be valued, the security is valued at its fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. A security traded on a securities exchange or in an over-the-counter market in which transaction prices are reported is valued at the last sales price at the time of valuation. A security traded principally on NASDAQ is valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds are valued at their closing net asset value as reported to NASDAQ. A security for which there is no reported sale on the valuation date is valued at the latest bid quotation. Short-term investments maturing in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. A security for which a market quotation is not readily available and any other assets are valued at their fair value determined in good faith under consistently applied procedures established by the Board of Trustees. The Trust has retained an independent statistical fair value pricing service that employs a systematic methodology to assist in the fair valuation process for securities principally traded in a foreign market in order to adjust for possible changes in value that may occur between the close of the foreign market and the time as of which the securities are to be valued. If a security is valued at a fair value, that value may be different from the last quoted market price for the security.

Repurchase agreements

The Fund may engage in repurchase agreement transactions. The Fund, through its custodian, receives delivery of underlying securities collateralizing each repurchase agreement. The counterparty is required to maintain collateral that is at all times at least equal to the repurchase price including interest. In the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, realization and/or retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings.

Foreign currency translations

Values of investments denominated in foreign currencies are converted into U.S. dollars using the New York spot market rate of exchange at the time of valuation. Purchases and sales of investments and dividend and interest income are translated into U.S. dollars using the spot market rate of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. The gain or loss resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates is included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss from investments, as appropriate.

Securities lending

The Fund may lend securities up to one-third of the value of its total assets to certain approved brokers, dealers and other financial institutions to earn additional income. The Fund retains the benefits of owning the securities, including receipt of dividends or interest generated by the security. The Fund also receives a fee for the loan. The Fund has the ability to recall the loans at any time and could do so in order to vote proxies or to sell the loaned securities. Each loan is collateralized by cash that exceeded the value of the securities on loan. The market value of the loaned securities is determined daily at the close of business of the Fund and any additional required collateral is delivered to each Fund on the next business day. The Fund has elected to invest the cash collateral in the Dreyfus Government Cash Management Fund and the income earned is paid to the Fund, net of any fees remitted to Goldman Sachs Agency Lending as the lending agent and borrower rebates. The Fund's adviser, Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (CWAM), does not retain any fees earned by the lending program. Generally, in the event of borrower default, the Fund has the right to use the collateral to offset any losses incurred. In the event the Fund is delayed or prevented from exercising its right to dispose of the collateral, there may be a potential loss to the Fund. Some of these losses may be indemnified by the lending agent. The Fund bears the risk of loss with respect to the investment of collateral.

The net lending income earned by the Fund as of June 30, 2011, is included in the Statement of Operations.

Security transactions and investment income

Security transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order to buy or sell is executed) and dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, except that certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as soon as the information is available to the Fund. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes amortization of discounts on debt obligations when required for federal income tax purposes. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis. Awards, if any, from class action litigation related to securities owned may be recorded as a reduction of cost of those securities. If the applicable securities are no longer owned, the proceeds are recorded as realized gains. The Fund estimates the tax character of distributions from real estate investment trusts (REITs). Distributions received in excess of income are recorded as a reduction of the cost of the related investments. If the applicable securities are no longer owned, any distributions received in excess of income are recorded as realized gains.

Restricted securities

Restricted securities are securities that may only be resold upon registration under federal securities laws or in transactions exempt from registration. In some cases, the issuer of restricted securities has agreed to register such securities for resale at the issuer's expense either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Such restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Board of Trustees.

Fund share valuation

Fund shares are sold and redeemed on a daily basis at net asset value. Net asset value per share is determined daily as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the Exchange) on each day the Exchange is open for trading by dividing the total value of the Fund's investments and other assets, less liabilities, by the number of Fund shares outstanding.

Custody fees/Credits

Custody fees are reduced based on the Fund's cash balances maintained with the custodian. The amount is disclosed as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.

Federal income taxes

The Fund has complied with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code available to regulated investment companies and, in the manner provided therein, distributes all its taxable income, as well as any net realized gain on sales of investments and foreign currency transactions reportable for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Fund paid no federal income taxes and no federal income tax provision was required.


19



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Expenses

General expenses of the Trust are allocated to the Fund and the other series of the Trust based upon relative net assets or other expense allocation methodologies determined by the nature of the expense. Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged to the Fund.

Distributions to shareholders

Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.

Indemnification

In the normal course of business, the Trust on behalf of the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and that provide general indemnities. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims against the Fund. Also under the Trust's organizational documents, the trustees and officers of the Trust are indemnified against certain liabilities that may arise out of their duties to the Trust. However based on experience, the Fund expects the risk of loss due to these warranties and indemnities to be remote.

3.  Federal Tax Information

The tax character of distributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows:

    December 31, 2010  
Distributions paid from:  
Ordinary Income*   $    
Long-Term Capital Gains        

 

* For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions, if any, are considered ordinary income distributions.

Capital loss carryforwards that were utilized for the Fund during the year ended December 31, 2010 were $64,124,065.

Management is required to determine whether a tax position of the Fund is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized by the Fund is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Management is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. However, management's conclusions may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, new tax laws, regulations, and administrative interpretations (including relevant court decisions). The Fund's federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

4.   Transactions With Affiliates

CWAM is a wholly owned subsidiary of Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC (Columbia Management), which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (Ameriprise Financial). CWAM furnishes continuing investment supervision to the Fund and is responsible for the overall management of the Fund's business affairs.

CWAM receives a monthly advisory fee based on the Fund's average daily net assets at the following annual rates:

Average Daily Net Assets   Annual Fee Rate  
Up to $100 million     0.94 %  
$100 million to $250 million     0.89 %  
$250 million to $2 billion     0.84 %  
$2 billion and over     0.80 %  

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the annualized effective investment advisory fee rate net of fee waivers, was 0.85% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Effective April 30, 2010, CWAM has contractually agreed to reimburse the Fund to the extent that investment advisory fees exceed an annual percentage of 0.85% of average daily net assets on an annualized basis, through April 30, 2012. The reimbursement to the Fund for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $40,610.

CWAM provides administrative services and receives an administration fee from the Fund at the following annual rates.

Wanger Advisors Trust Aggregate
Average Daily Net Assets of the Trust
  Annual Fee Rate  
Up to $4 million     0.05 %  
$4 billion to $6 billion     0.04 %  
$6 billion to $8 billion     0.03 %  
$8 billion and over     0.02 %  

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the annualized effective administration fee rate was 0.05% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Columbia Management provides certain sub-administrative services to the Fund.

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. (CMID), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, serves as the Fund's distributor and principal underwriter.

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp. (CMIS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial, provides shareholder services to the Fund and contracted with Boston Financial Data Services (BFDS) to serve as subtransfer agent. For its services, the Fund pays CMIS a monthly fee at the annual rate of $21.00 per open account. CMIS also receives reimbursement from the Fund for certain out-of-pocket expenses. The arrangement with BFDS has been continued by CMIS.

Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are also officers of CWAM. The Trust makes no direct payments to its officers and trustees who are affiliated with CWAM.

The Board of Trustees has appointed a Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust in accordance with federal securities regulations. The Fund, along with other affiliated funds, pays its pro-rata share of the expenses associated with the Office of the Chief Compliance Officer. These expenses are disclosed separately as "Chief compliance officer expenses" in the Statement of Operations.

The Trust offers a deferred compensation plan for its independent trustees. Under that plan, a trustee may elect to defer all or a portion of his or her compensation. Amounts deferred are retained by the Trust and may represent an unfunded obligation of the Trust. The value of amounts deferred is determined by reference to the change in value of Class Z shares of one or more series of Columbia Acorn Trust or a money market fund as specified by the trustee. Benefits under the deferred compensation plan are payable when the trustee ceases to be a member of the Board of Trustees.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Fund engaged in purchase and sales transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common directors/trustees, and/or common officers. Those purchase and sale transactions complied with provisions of Rule 17a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and were $117,440 and $-, respectively.

5.  Borrowing Arrangements

The Trust participates in a $150 million credit facility, along with another Trust managed by CWAM, which was entered into to facilitate portfolio liquidity. Under the facility, interest is charged to each participating fund based on its borrowings at a rate per annum equal to the higher of Federal Funds Rate or Overnight LIBOR plus 1.25%. In addition, a commitment fee of 0.125% per annum of the unutilized line of credit is accrued and apportioned among the participating funds based on their relative net assets. The commitment fee is included in "Other expenses" in the Statement of Operations. No amounts were borrowed by the Fund under this facility during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Trust enters into this line of credit for one year durations. The Trust has secured the line of credit for the entire year of 2012.


20



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

6.  Fund Share Transactions

Proceeds and payments on Fund shares as shown in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets are in respect of the following numbers of shares:

    (Unaudited)
Six months ended
June 30, 2011
  Year ended
December 31, 2010
 
Shares sold     520,576       1,377,861    
Shares issued in reinvestment
of dividend distributions
    2,434,130          
Less shares redeemed     (2,500,701 )     (20,982,637 )  
Net increase (decrease) in shares outstanding     454,005       (19,604,776 )  

 

7.  Investment Transactions

The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales other than short-term obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $33,171,326 and $106,378,904, respectively.

8.  Information Regarding Pending and Settled Legal Proceedings

In June 2004, an action captioned John E. Gallus et al. v. American Express Financial Corp. and American Express Financial Advisors Inc. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege that they are investors in several American Express Company (now known as legacy RiverSource) mutual funds and they purport to bring the action derivatively on behalf of those funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The plaintiffs allege that fees allegedly paid to the defendants by the funds for investment advisory and administrative services are excessive. The plaintiffs seek remedies including restitution and rescission of investment advisory and distribution agreements. The plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (the District Court). In response to defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, the District Court dismissed one of plaintiffs' four claims and granted plaintiffs limited discovery. Defendants moved for summary judgment in April 2007. Summary judgment was granted in the defendants' favor on July 9, 2007. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (the Eighth Circuit) on August 8, 2007. On April 8, 2009, the Eighth Circuit reversed summary judgment and remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. On August 6, 2009, defendants filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court (the Supreme Court), asking the Supreme Court to stay the District Court proceedings while the Supreme Court considers and rules in a case captioned Jones v. Harris Associates, which involves issues of law similar to those presented in the Gallus case. On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jones v. Harris Associates, and on April 5, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuit's decision in the Gallus case and remanded the case to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On June 4, 2010, the Eighth Circuit remanded the Gallus case to the District Court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On December 9, 2010, the District Court reinstated its July 9, 2007 summary judgment order in favor of the defendants. On January 10, 2011, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eight Circuit. In response to the plaintiffs' opening appellate brief filed on March 18, 2011, the defendants filed a response brief on May 4, 2011 with the Eighth Circuit. The plaintiffs filed a reply brief on May 26, 2011.

In December 2005, without admitting or denying the allegations, American Express Financial Corporation (AEFC, which is now known as Ameriprise Financial, Inc. (Ameriprise Financial)), entered into settlement agreements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Minnesota Department of Commerce (MDOC) related to market timing activities. As a result, AEFC was censured and ordered to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and various Minnesota laws. AEFC agreed to pay disgorgement of $10 million and civil money penalties of $7 million. AEFC also agreed to retain an independent distribution consultant to assist in developing a plan for distribution of all disgorgement and civil penalties ordered by the SEC in accordance with various undertakings detailed at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/ia-2451.pdf. Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have cooperated with the SEC and the MDOC in these legal proceedings, and have made regular reports to the RiverSource, Seligman and Threadneedle funds' Boards of Directors/Trustees.

Ameriprise Financial and certain of its affiliates have historically been involved in a number of legal, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, including routine litigation, class actions, and governmental actions, concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of their business activities. Ameriprise Financial believes that the Funds are not currently the subject of, and that neither Ameriprise Financial nor any of its affiliates are the subject of, any pending legal, arbitration or regulatory proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds. Ameriprise Financial is required to make 10-Q, 10-K and, as necessary, 8-K filings with the SEC on legal and regulatory matters that relate to Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. Copies of these filings may be obtained by accessing the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

There can be no assurance that these matters, or the adverse publicity associated with them, will not result in increased fund redemptions, reduced sale of fund shares or other adverse consequences to the Funds. Further, although we believe proceedings are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds, these proceedings are subject to uncertainties and, as such, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other relief that could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of Ameriprise Financial.


21




Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

[Excerpt from:]

Wanger Advisors Trust

Management Fee Evaluation of the Senior Officer

Prepared Pursuant to the New York Attorney General's
Assurance of Discontinuance

May 2011


22



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Introduction

The New York Attorney General's Assurance of Discontinuance ("Order") entered into by Columbia Management Advisors, LLC ("CMA") and Columbia Management Distributors, Inc., ("CMDI") in February 2005, allows CMA to manage or advise a mutual fund only if the trustees of the fund appoint a "Senior Officer" to perform specified duties and responsibilities. Among these responsibilities is "managing the process by which proposed management fees (including but not limited to, advisory fees) to be charged the [funds] are negotiated so that they are negotiated in a manner which is at arms' length and reasonable and consistent with this Assurance of Discontinuance."

The Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust (collectively, the "Trusts") and each series thereof (the "Acorn funds," "WAT funds" or collectively, the "Funds") are overseen by the same Board of Trustees ("Board"). The Order provides that this Board must determine the reasonableness of proposed "management fees" by using either an annual competitive bidding process supervised by the Senior Officer or Independent Fee Consultant, or by obtaining "an annual independent written evaluation prepared by or under the direction of the Senior Officer or the Independent Fee Consultant."

"Management fees" are only part of the costs and expenses paid by mutual fund shareholders. Fund expenses can vary depending upon the class of shares held but usually include: (1) advisory fees to compensate analysts and portfolio managers for stock research and portfolio management, as well as the cost of operating a trading desk; (2) administrative expenses incurred to prepare registration statements and tax returns, calculate the funds' net asset values, maintain effective compliance procedures and perform recordkeeping services; (3) transfer agency costs for establishing accounts, accepting and disbursing funds, as well as overseeing trading in fund shares; (4) custodial expenses incurred to hold the securities purchased by the funds; and (5) distribution expenses, including commissions paid to brokers that sell the fund shares to investors. "Management fees" consist of (1) and (2), but not the other services.

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("CWAM"), is the adviser to the Funds, and at present is wholly owned by Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise"). The name Columbia Management or Columbia, is used to refer to the group of entities that manage or provide services to funds bearing the brand name "Columbia." These entities include Columbia Management Investment Advisers, ("CMIA"), the successor entity to CMA, Columbia Management Investment Services, Inc. ("CMIS") and Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. ("CMID"), the successor entity to CMDI. The Columbia asset management business, formerly owned by Bank of America Corporation ("Bank of America"), is now owned by Ameriprise.

The Change of Ownership

On September 29, 2009, Bank of America entered into a Purchase Agreement with Ameriprise providing for, among other things, the sale of CWAM to Ameriprise and the acquisition by Ameriprise of certain assets of Columbia. The sale closed on May 1, 2010. A new advisory agreement is required under these circumstances. In advance of that closing, Columbia and Ameriprise proposed that the Trusts continue, in substance, the then existing advisory agreement governing portfolio management, and the administration services agreement governing certain administration and clerical services. They proposed no material changes to these agreements, no change in services and no changes in fee levels, only those changes necessary to effect the change of ownership. The Board of Trustees approved the new advisory agreements, and on May 27, 2010, shareholders voted to approve them too. The investment management team responsible for the Funds remained with CWAM following the Ameriprise acquisition.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") effectively bars an increase in management fees for two years following a change in ownership of a fund's advisor (other than for bona fide additional investment advisory services); the purpose of this prohibition is to preclude management from financing the purchase through increased advisory fees. Ameriprise has represented to the Board that it intends to comply with these restrictions, and does not seek increased management fees at this time. Rather, Ameriprise seeks only to renew the advisory and related agreements on their existing terms.

Requirements of the Order

The Order applies to any successor to substantially all the assets of CMDI and CMA. Thus, it applies to CMIA and CMID as successors to CMA and CMDI. Under the Order, a fee evaluation must precede the execution of new or the extension of existing advisory and administration services agreements. The existing agreements continue in effect until July 31, 2011.

In conformity with the terms of the Order and past evaluations, this Evaluation addresses only the advisory and administration contracts, and does not extend to the Funds' underwriting and transfer agency agreements.

According to the Order, the Senior Officer's evaluation must consider a number of factors. These factors parallel the standard set forth in the Gartenberg case. They are following:

(1)  Management fees (including components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of CWAM for like services;

(2)  Management fees (including any components thereof) charged by other mutual fund companies for like services;

(3)  Costs to CWAM and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit;

(4)  Profit margins of CWAM and its affiliates from supplying such services;

(5)  Possible economies of scale as the Funds grow larger; and

(6)  The nature and quality of CWAM's services, including the performance of each Fund.

In 2004, the Boards of the two Trusts, then separate groups, each appointed me Senior Officer under the Order. They also determined not to pursue a competitive bidding process and instead, charged me with the responsibility of evaluating the Funds' proposed advisory and administration fee contracts with CWAM in conformity with the requirements of the Order. In discharging their responsibilities, the independent Trustees have also consulted independent, outside counsel. The Board has asked that I prepare this Evaluation.


23



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Scope of this Evaluation

This Evaluation is qualified in two respects. First, assessing such factors as cost of service, profitability, projected economies of scale, and expected quality of service, involves, at present, a significant element of uncertainty. Ameriprise and Columbia hope to effect cost savings by virtue of the increased scale of their operations. The integration of the two organizations is not, however, complete at this time, so the anticipated benefits are impossible to quantify now and hence cannot effectively be weighed in assessing the reasonableness of the proposed management fee. Profitability data is, to some extent, based on pro forma financial statements. At the same time, Ameriprise and Columbia have assured the Board that the Funds will not suffer diminished services as a result of the combination, nor do they propose to change the fee levels set forth in the existing advisory and administration services agreements. The upshot is that the Fund shareholders will, if the advisory agreements are renewed and asset levels do not decrease, pay no more than they do now, but it is too early to determine whether the change in ownership will result in material changes in the calculus of assessing the fairness of the management fee. Of necessity this must be left to future evaluations.

A second consideration concerns the new funds recently approved by the Board of Trustees. Earlier this year, CWAM and Ameriprise proposed two new Acorn funds: Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund ("Acorn Emerging Markets"), and Columbia Acorn European Fund ("Acorn European"). I issued a fee evaluation in February 2011 addressing the management fees proposed for those new funds. In March 2011, the Board approved amendments to the advisory and other agreements necessary to launch the new funds. They have not yet, however, been offered. Consequently, there is nothing to add here to the evaluation done in February, so this Evaluation does not address those funds.

Process and Independence

The objectives of the Order are to ensure the independent evaluation of the management fees paid by the Funds as well as to insure that all relevant factors are considered. In my view, this contract process has been conducted at arms-length and with independence in gathering, considering and evaluating all relevant data. At the outset of the process, the Trustees sought and obtained from Ameriprise and Columbia a comprehensive compilation of data regarding Fund performance and expenses, adviser profitability, and other information. The Trustees, acting through their Contract Committee evaluated this information thoroughly, and met often to discuss it. Performance and expense data was obtained from both Morningstar and Lipper, the leading consultants in this area. The rankings prepared by Morningstar and Lipper were independent and prepared in conformity with the methodologies employed by those organizations. Counsel for the Funds and the Independent Trustees considered, as did I, the terms and conditions of the proposed contracts.

My evaluation of the advisory contracts was shaped, as it has been in the past, by my experience as Chief Compliance Officer of the Trusts ("CCO"). As CCO, I report solely to the Board and have no reporting obligation to, or employment relationship with, Ameriprise or its affiliates. I have commented on compliance matters in evaluating the quality of service provided by CWAM.

This Report, its supporting materials and the data contained in other materials submitted to the Contract Committee, in my view, provide a thorough factual basis upon which the Board, in consultation with independent counsel as it deems appropriate, may conduct management fee negotiations that are in the best interests of the Funds' shareholders.

The Fee Reductions Mandated under the Order

Under the terms of the Order, Columbia agreed to secure certain management fee reductions for the mutual funds advised by its affiliate investment advisers. In some instances, breakpoints were also established. Although neither CWAM nor the Trusts was a party to the Order, CWAM offered and the Board accepted certain advisory fee reductions during 2005. By the terms of the Order, these fees could not be increased before November 30, 2009, and, in fact, have not been increased since. As a result of the Ameriprise acquisition, the Investment Company Act precludes any increases in management fees before May 2012 (other than for bona fide additional investment advisory services). Therefore, CWAM and Ameriprise propose the continuation of the contracts and management fees as they now exist; no increases in these fees are sought, and no reductions offered.

Conclusions

My review of the data and other material above leads to the following conclusions with respect to the factors identified in the Order.

A.  Fund Performance

The Domestic Funds: The Acorn Fund has achieved good performance over the past five years, and excellent results over longer periods. Acorn Select and Wanger Select have enjoyed better than average investment returns over the past five years, but have suffered reversals in more recent periods. Both funds expose investors to greater relative risk than the other domestic Funds. Acorn USA and its parallel, Wanger USA are the weakest performers, falling behind their benchmark and peer medians over one and five years. Thermostat is unique and therefore difficult to assess, but has outperformed its benchmark and now enjoys strong rankings from Morningstar.

The International Funds: The international Funds have delivered excellent results over the past five years, and done so while exposing investors to less risk than competing funds. They have also outperformed their benchmarks during this period, but recent results have been more restrained. The international Funds enjoy positive "alpha," confirming the value of their portfolio managers.

B.  Management Fees Relative to Peers

There is significant variance in management fee rankings across the Funds. Acorn International is the only fund that was ranked in the top quartile by both Morningstar and Lipper. The other Acorn funds tend to fall around the medians identified by one or the other service. The WAT funds are uniformly more expensive than their peers.


24



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

C.  Management Fees Relative to Institutional Account and Other Mutual Fund Accounts

CWAM's focus is on its mutual funds. The few institutional accounts it does manage vary in rate structures. Some pay advisory fees commensurate with or higher than the Acorn and WAT funds. In a few instances, however, institutional accounts pay lower advisory fees than do the Acorn funds. One such institutional account is significant in size and has been under CWAM's management for over 33 years. Furthermore, CWAM performs sub-advisory services for mutual funds managed by Ameriprise affiliates, CWAM's parent organization, at rates that are lower than those paid by the parallel Acorn funds, though sub-advisory services usually differ from those necessary for the full support of a mutual fund.

D.  Administrative Services

The Acorn and WAT funds' administrative fees are within the range of fees charged by competitors, but these rankings suffer from a lack of uniformity in the scope of services encompassed by the fee. CWAM provides excellent administrative support for all the Funds.

E.  Costs and Benefits to CWAM and its Affiliates

CWAM's direct costs do not appear excessive. Overhead and indirect costs allocated to CWAM by its parent organization, however, are significant and have varied considerably over the years. CWAM's affiliates report operating losses and although the allocations leading to these losses may bear closer scrutiny, Ameriprise affiliates do not appear to enjoy excessive "fall out" benefits from CWAM's advisory agreement with the Funds. CWAM continues, however, to enjoy substantial benefits from the use of "soft dollar" payments for research.

F.  Profitability

CWAM's profit margins may be in the upper range of its competitors, but peer profitability is difficult to assess given differences in products, operations and other factors. Furthermore, there is limited public information available with regard to the profitability of investment advisers.

G.  Economies of Scale

Economies of scale do exist at CWAM, and the Board has instituted breakpoints that reduce fess as assets increase. Though asset levels have recovered from recent lows, sustained asset growth will be required to trigger additional fee reductions under the current schedule.

H.  Nature and Quality of Service

This category includes a variety of considerations that are difficult to quantify, yet can have a significant bearing on the performance of the Acorn and WAT funds. Several areas merit comment: (1) CWAM has maintained its investment management capacity and an experienced staff; and (2) CWAM has a reasonably designed compliance program that protects shareholders.

I.  Process

In my opinion, the process of negotiating an advisory contract for the Funds has been conducted thoroughly and at arms' length. The Board's Contract Committee has sought and obtained extensive data bearing on the reasonableness of the management fees proposed by CWAM. The Trustees have sufficient information to evaluate management's proposal, and negotiate contract terms that are in the best interests of fund shareholders.

Recommendation

According to Morningstar, Acorn USA and Wanger USA have delivered performance below peer medians for the past one and five years, while imposing management fees that exceed them. Management has fashioned various initiatives to improve performance, and the Trustees should continue to monitor both Funds closely to assess the impact of those initiatives.


25



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement

Wanger Advisors Trust (the "Trust") has an investment advisory agreement (the "Advisory Agreement") with Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC ("CWAM") under which CWAM manages the Wanger Funds (the "Funds"). More than 75% of the trustees of the Trust (the "Trustees") are comprised of persons who have no direct or indirect interest in the Advisory Agreement and are not "interested persons" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act")) of the Trust (the "Independent Trustees"). The Trustees oversee the management of each Fund and, as required by law, determine at least annually whether to continue the Advisory Agreement for each Fund.

The Contract Committee of the Board (the "Committee"), which is comprised solely of Independent Trustees, makes recommendations to the Board regarding any proposed continuation of the Advisory Agreement. After the Committee has made its recommendations, the full Board determines whether to approve continuation of the Advisory Agreement. The Board also considers matters bearing on the Advisory Agreement at its various meetings throughout the year, meets at least quarterly with CWAM's portfolio managers and receives monthly reports from CWAM on the performance of the Funds.

In connection with their most recent consideration of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund, the Committee and all Trustees received and reviewed a substantial amount of information provided by CWAM, Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ("Columbia Management") and Ameriprise Financial, Inc. ("Ameriprise"), in response to written requests from the Independent Trustees and their independent legal counsel. Throughout the process, the Trustees had numerous opportunities to ask questions of and request additional materials from CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise.

During each meeting at which the Committee or the Independent Trustees considered the Advisory Agreement, they met in executive session with their independent legal counsel. The Committee also met with representatives of CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise on several occasions. In all, the Committee convened formally on five separate occasions to consider the continuation of the Advisory Agreement. The Board and/or some or all of the Independent Trustees met on other occasions to receive the Committee's status reports, receive presentations from CWAM, Columbia Management and Ameriprise representatives, and to discuss outstanding issues. In addition, the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board, also comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees, reviewed the performance of the Funds and presented its findings to the Board and the Committee throughout the year. The Compliance Committee also provided information to the Committee with respect to relevant matters.

The Trustees reviewed the Advisory Agreement, as well as certain information obtained through CWAM's, Columbia Management's and Ameriprise's responses to independent legal counsel's questionnaires. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the Management Fee Evaluation dated May 2011 (the "Fee Evaluation") prepared by the Trust's chief compliance officer, senior vice president and general counsel, who also serves as the Trust's "Senior Officer," as contemplated by the Assurance of Discontinuance dated February 9, 2005 among former affiliates of CWAM and the Office of the New York Attorney General. A summary of the Fee Evaluation is included in this report.

The materials reviewed by the Committee and the Trustees included, among other items, (i) information on the investment performance of each Fund and of independently selected peer groups of funds and of the Funds' performance benchmarks over various time periods, (ii) information on each Fund's advisory fees and other expenses, including information comparing the Fund's fees and expenses to those of peer groups of funds and information about any applicable expense limitations and fee breakpoints, (iii) data on sales and redemptions of Fund shares, and (iv) information on the profitability to CWAM and Ameriprise, as well as potential "fall-out" or ancillary benefits that CWAM and its affiliates may receive as a result of their relationships with the Funds. The Trustees also considered other information such as (i) CWAM's financial condition, (ii) each Fund's investment objective and strategy, (iii) the size, education and experience of CWAM's investment staff and its use of technology, external research and trading cost measurement tools, (iv) the portfolio manager compensation framework, (v) the allocation of the Funds' brokerage, and the use of "soft" commission dollars to pay for research products and services, and (vi) the resources devoted to, and the record of compliance with, the Funds' investment policies and restrictions, policies on personal securities transactions and other compliance policies.

At a meeting held on June 8, 2011, upon recommendations of the Committee, the Board of Trustees unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreement.

In considering the continuation of the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, none of which by itself was considered dispositive. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Trustees' determination to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement are discussed below.

Nature, quality and extent of services. The Trustees reviewed the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates to the Funds under the Advisory Agreement, taking into account the investment objective and strategy of each Fund and knowledge gained from meetings with management, which were held on at least a quarterly basis. In addition, the Trustees reviewed the available resources and key personnel of CWAM and its affiliates, especially those providing investment management services to the Funds. The Trustees also considered other services provided to the Funds by CWAM and its affiliates, including: managing the execution of portfolio transactions and selecting broker-dealers for those transactions; monitoring adherence to the Funds' investment restrictions; producing shareholder reports; providing support services for the Board and committees of the Board; communicating with shareholders; serving as the Funds' administrator; and overseeing the activities of the Funds' other service providers, including monitoring for compliance with various policies and procedures as well as applicable securities laws and regulations.

The Trustees concluded that the nature, quality and extent of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates to each Fund under the Advisory Agreement were appropriate for the Funds and that the Funds were likely to benefit from the continued provision of those services by CWAM. They also concluded that CWAM currently had sufficient personnel, with appropriate education and experience, to serve the Funds effectively, and that the firm had demonstrated its continuing ability to attract and retain well-qualified personnel. In addition, they took note of the quality of CWAM's compliance record.

Performance of the Funds. The Trustees received and considered detailed performance information at various meetings of the Board, the Committee and the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board throughout the year. They reviewed information comparing each Fund's performance with that of its benchmark(s) and with the performance of comparable funds and peer groups as identified by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper") and Morningstar, Inc. ("Morningstar"). The Trustees evaluated the performance of the Funds over various time periods, including over the one-, three- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010. The Trustees also considered peer performance rankings based on a rolling five-year period.

The Trustees noted that the international Funds have delivered excellent results over the past five years, and have done so while exposing investors to less risk than competing funds, according to Morningstar. They considered that the domestic Funds have had mixed results. Wanger Select had better than average results measured against its peers over the five-year period but underperformed over the one- and three-year periods ending December 31, 2010. Wanger Select outperformed its benchmark for the five-year period but underperformed over the three-year period and equaled its benchmark for the one-year period ending December 31, 2010. Wanger USA outperformed its peer group medians over the three-year period but underperformed its peer group medians over the one- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2010 and also underperformed its benchmark over the same one-, three- and five-year periods. The Trustees noted that the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board concluded that Fund performance was generally satisfactory, except that Wanger USA's performance had slipped below the Lipper and Morningstar medians during the past year. The Trustees considered that CWAM had taken and was taking a number of corrective steps with respect to Wanger USA's underperformance and that the Investment Performance Analysis Committee of the Board was monitoring the Fund's performance.


26



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Board Approval of the Advisory Agreement

The Trustees concluded that, although past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results, the strong overall longer-term performance record of the Funds was an important factor in their evaluation of the quality of services provided by CWAM under the Advisory Agreement for each Fund.

Costs of Services and Profits Realized by CWAM. At various Committee and Board meetings, the Trustees examined detailed information on the fees and expenses of each Fund in comparison to information for comparable funds provided by Lipper and Morningstar. The Trustees reviewed data from Lipper and Morningstar and noted that all Funds other than Wanger International Select had lower total net operating expenses than their respective Lipper peer group medians and only Wanger USA had total net operating expenses above its Morningstar peer group median. As noted in the Fee Evaluation, the actual advisory fees paid by Wanger Select and Wanger USA were higher than the median advisory fee of the Funds' Morningstar peer groups and the actual advisory fee paid by each Fund was higher than the median advisory fee of each Fund's Lipper peer group. The Trustees reviewed the observations in the Fee Evaluation and noted that the Funds are assessed by Morningstar and Lipper in relation to peers selected only from the variable annuity universe.

The Trustees also considered that Ameriprise represented and agreed that advisory fees would not be raised for the two years following the close of its acquisition of CWAM (May 1, 2010) pursuant to Section 15(f) of the 1940 Act.

The Trustees also reviewed the advisory fee rates charged by CWAM for managing other investment companies (including the Columbia Acorn Funds), sub-advised funds and other institutional separate accounts, as detailed in the Fee Evaluation. The Trustees noted that the Funds' advisory fees were generally comparable to the Columbia Acorn Funds' advisory fees at the same asset levels. The Trustees also examined CWAM's institutional separate account fees for various investment strategies; in some cases those fees were higher than the advisory fees charged to the Funds, and in a few instances the fees were lower. The Trustees noted that CWAM performs significant additional services for the Funds that it does not provide to sub-advised funds or non-mutual fund clients, including administrative services, oversight of the Funds' other service providers, Trustee support, regulatory compliance and numerous other services, and that, in servicing the Funds, CWAM assumes many legal risks that it does not assume in servicing many of its non-fund clients.

The Trustees concluded that the rates of advisory fees payable to CWAM were reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services to be provided. The Trustees also concluded that the Funds' overall expense ratios were reasonable, considering the quality of the services provided by CWAM and its affiliates and the investment performance of the Funds.

The Trustees reviewed the analysis of the historic profitability of CWAM in serving as each Fund's investment adviser and of CWAM and its affiliates in their relationships with each Fund. The Committee and Trustees met on several occasions with representatives from Ameriprise to discuss its methodologies for calculating profitability and allocating costs. They considered that Ameriprise calculated profitability and allocated costs on a contract-by-contract and fund-by-fund basis. The Trustees also considered the methodology used by CWAM and Ameriprise in determining compensation payable to portfolio managers and the competitive market for investment management talent. The Trustees were also provided with profitability information from Lipper and Strategic Insight, which compared CWAM's profitability to other similar investment advisers in the mutual fund industry. The Trustees concluded that CWAM's and its affiliates' profits were within a reasonable range of those of competitors with similar business models. The Trustees discussed, however, that profitability comparisons among fund managers may not always be meaningful due to the lack of consistency in data, small number of publicly-owned managers, and the fact that profitability of any investment manager is affected by numerous factors, including its particular organizational structure, the types of funds and other accounts managed, other lines of business, expense allocation methodology, capital structure and cost of capital.

Economies of Scale. At various Committee and Board meetings and other informal meetings, the Trustees considered information about the extent to which CWAM realizes economies of scale in connection with an increase in Fund assets. The Trustees also discussed the potential for Fund sales growth. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedule for each Fund includes breakpoints in the rate of fees at various asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee structure of each Fund was reflective of a sharing between CWAM and the Funds of economies of scale.

Other Benefits to CWAM. The Trustees also reviewed benefits that accrue to CWAM and its affiliates from their relationships with the Funds, as outlined in the Fee Evaluation. They noted that the Funds' transfer agency services are performed by Columbia Management Investment Services Corp., an affiliate of Ameriprise, which receives compensation from the Funds for its services provided. They considered that an affiliate of Ameriprise, Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. ("CMID"), serves as the Funds' distributor under a distribution agreement and receives no fees for its services. In addition, Columbia Management provides sub-administration services to the Funds. The Committee received information regarding the profitability of each Fund agreement with CWAM affiliates. The Committee and the Board also reviewed information about and discussed the capabilities of each affiliated entity in performing its duties.

The Trustees considered other ways that the Funds and CWAM may potentially benefit from their relationship with each other. For example, the Trustees considered CWAM's use of commissions paid by each Fund on its portfolio brokerage transactions to obtain research products and services benefiting the Funds and/or other clients of CWAM. The Committee reviewed CWAM's annual "soft dollar" report and met with representatives from CWAM to review CWAM's soft dollar spending. The Committee also considered that the Compliance Committee of the Board regularly reviewed third-party prepared reports that evaluated the quality of CWAM's execution of the Funds' portfolio transactions. The Trustees determined that CWAM's use of the Funds' "soft" commission dollars to obtain research products and services was consistent with current regulatory requirements and guidance. They also concluded that CWAM benefits from the receipt of proprietary research products and services acquired through commissions paid on portfolio transactions of the Funds, and that the Funds benefit from CWAM's receipt of those products and services as well as research products and services acquired through commissions paid by other clients of CWAM.

After full consideration of the above factors, as well as other factors that were instructive in evaluating the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, unanimously concluded that the continuation of the Advisory Agreement was in the best interest of each Fund. On June 8, 2011, the Trustees approved continuation of the Advisory Agreement through July 31, 2012.


27



Wanger USA 2011 Semiannual Report

Columbia Wanger Funds

Trustees

Laura M. Born
Chair of the Board

Steven N. Kaplan
Vice Chair of the Board

Michelle L. Collins
Maureen M. Culhane
Margaret M. Eisen
John C. Heaton
Charles P. McQuaid
Allan B. Muchin
David J. Rudis
David B. Small
Ralph Wanger (Trustee Emeritus)

Officers

Charles P. McQuaid
President

Ben Andrews
Vice President

Robert A. Chalupnik
Vice President

Michael G. Clarke
Assistant Treasurer

Joseph F. DiMaria
Assistant Treasurer

P. Zachary Egan
Vice President

John M. Kunka
Assistant Treasurer

Joseph C. LaPalm
Vice President

Bruce H. Lauer
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer

Louis J. Mendes III
Vice President

Robert A. Mohn
Vice President

Christopher J. Olson
Vice President

Christopher O. Petersen
Assistant Secretary

Scott R. Plummer
Assistant Secretary

Linda K. Roth-Wiszowaty
Assistant Secretary

Robert P. Scales
Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President and
General Counsel

Transfer Agent,
Dividend Disbursing Agent

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp.
P.O. Box 8081
Boston, Massachusetts
02266-8081

Distributor

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc.
225 Franklin Street
Boston, Massachusetts
02110

Investment Adviser

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC
227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000
Chicago, Illinois 60606
1-888-4-WANGER
(1-888-492-6437)

Legal Counsel to the Funds

Perkins Coie LLP
Washington, DC

Legal Counsel to the Independent Trustees

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois

This report, including the schedules of investments and financial statements, is submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Wanger Advisors Trust.

A description of the Fund's proxy voting policies and procedures and a copy of the Fund's voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 are available (i) on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov, and (ii) without charge, upon request, by calling 888-492-6437.

The Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund's Form N-Q is available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330. The Fund's complete portfolio holdings are disclosed at www.columbiamanagement.com approximately 30 days after each month-end.


28




Columbia Wanger Funds

© 2011 Columbia Management Investments Advisers, LLC. All rights reserved.

C-1452 C (8/11) 122623




 

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

 

Not applicable for semiannual reports.

 

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

 

Not applicable for semiannual reports.

 

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

 

Not applicable for semiannual reports.

 

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 6. Investments

 

(a)          The registrant’s “Schedule I — Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers” (as set forth in 17 CFR 210.12-12) is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

 

(b)         Not applicable.

 

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

 

Not applicable.

 



 

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

 

There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors.

 

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

 

(a)          The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officers, based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report, have concluded that such controls and procedures are adequately designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed by the registrant in Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

(b)         There was no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 12. Exhibits.

 

(a)(1) Code of ethics required to be disclosed under Item 2 of Form N-CSR: Not applicable for semiannual reports.

 

(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT.

 

(a)(3) Not applicable.

 

(b) Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT.

 



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

(registrant)

Wanger Advisors Trust

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By (Signature and Title)

/s/ Charles P. McQuaid

 

 

Charles P. McQuaid, President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date

August 19, 2011

 

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

By (Signature and Title)

/s/ Charles P. McQuaid

 

 

Charles P. McQuaid, President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date

August 19, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By (Signature and Title)

/s/ Bruce H. Lauer

 

 

Bruce H. Lauer, Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date

August 19, 2011