XML 17 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Stock-Based Compensation
3 Months Ended
Jun. 28, 2015
Stock-Based Compensation  
Stock-Based Compensation

Note 3. Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company’s selling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal quarters ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014 include $131,700 and $449,600, respectively, of non-cash stock-based compensation expense. Stock-based compensation expense is primarily related to our Performance Stock Unit (PSU) Program. In addition, the Company recorded an excess tax benefit directly to shareholders’ equity of $510,400 and $1,172,900, primarily related to the PSUs which vested during the three months ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, respectively. 

 

Performance Stock Units: The following table summarizes the activity under the Company’s PSU program for the first three months of fiscal 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Months Ended

 

Average Fair

 

 

 

June 28,

 

Value at Grant

 

 

 

2015

 

Date (per unit)

 

Unvested shares available for issue under outstanding PSUs, beginning of period

 

203,841

 

$

20.65

 

PSU’s Granted

 

103,000

 

 

22.15

 

PSU’s Vested

 

(87,107)

 

 

13.84

 

PSU’s Forfeited/Cancelled

 

(80,268)

 

 

28.57

 

Unvested shares available for issue under outstanding PSUs, end of period

 

139,466

 

$

21.45

 

 

Of the 139,466 shares available for issuance under PSUs outstanding but not yet vested as of June 28, 2015, 36,466 shares have been earned in respect of the applicable measurement year, and assuming the respective participants remain employed by or associated with the Company on these dates, the shares earned in respect of each measurement year will vest and be issued in installments beginning on or about May 1 of the fiscal year immediately following the applicable measurement year and continuing on or about May 1 of each of the three succeeding fiscal years.

 

During fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, with the concurrence of the full Board of Directors, granted PSUs to select key employees, providing them with the opportunity to earn up to 103,000 additional shares of the Company’s common stock in the aggregate, depending upon whether certain earnings per share targets are met, and subject to individual performance. These PSUs have a one year measurement period (fiscal 2016), with any shares earned at the end of fiscal 2016 vested and issued ratably on or about May 1 of 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019, provided that the respective participants remain employed by or associated with the Company on each date.

 

The PSUs cancelled during fiscal 2016 related primarily to the fiscal 2015 grant of PSUs, which had a one year measurement period (fiscal 2015). The PSUs were cancelled because the applicable fiscal 2015 performance targets were not fully attained. Per the provisions of the 1994 Plan, the shares related to these forfeited and cancelled PSUs were added back to the 1994 Plan and became available for future issuance.

 

If the entire number of PSUs granted in fiscal 2016 is assumed to be earned, total unrecognized compensation costs, on these PSUs plus all earned but unvested PSUs would be approximately $2.4 million, net of estimated forfeitures, as of June 28, 2015, and would be expensed through fiscal 2019. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from what is anticipated or the maximum number of PSUs granted in fiscal 2016 is not earned, stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from this amount.

 

Restricted Stock / Restricted Stock Units: In fiscal 2007, the Company granted 225,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as a restricted stock award under the 1994 Plan. These shares were issued (subject to the risk of forfeiture) and vest ratably over ten fiscal years based on service, beginning on the last day of fiscal 2007 and ending on the last day of fiscal 2016, subject, however, to the terms applicable to the award, including terms providing for possible acceleration of vesting upon death, disability, change in control or certain other events. The fair value for these shares at the grant date was $10.56 per share. As of June 28, 2015, 22,500 shares remained unvested, and there was no activity related to these restricted shares during the first three months of fiscal 2016. As of June 28, 2015, there was approximately $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, related to this issuance of restricted stock. Unrecognized compensation costs are expected to be recognized ratably over a remaining period of approximately one year.

 

In addition the Company has issued restricted stock units (RSUs) to its non-employee directors. On May 11, 2015, the Compensation Committee, with the concurrence of the full Board of Directors, awarded an aggregate of 10,000 RSUs to the non-employee directors of the Company. These awards provide for the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock in accordance with a four year annual vesting schedule, from the date of grant, provided that the director remains associated with the Company (or meets other criteria as prescribed in the applicable award agreement) on each such date.  As of June 28, 2015, there was approximately $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to all outstanding restricted stock unit awards, including the May 11, 2015 grant. Unrecognized compensation costs are expected to be recognized ratably over a remaining period of approximately three years.

 

PSUs and RSUs are expensed based on the grant date fair value, calculated as the closing price of TESSCO common stock as reported by NASDAQ on the date of grant minus the present value of dividends expected to be paid on the common stock before the award vests, because dividends or dividend-equivalent amounts do not accrue and are not paid on unvested PSUs and RSUs. Dividends do, however, accrue on both the vested and unvested shares subject to the restricted stock award made to the Company’s Chairman.  

 

To the extent the actual forfeiture rates are different from what is estimated, stock-based compensation related to the restricted awards will be different from the Company’s expectations.