10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q
Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-Q



QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002

Commission File Number 0-24568



INNKEEPERS USA TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



  Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  65-0503831
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 

  306 Royal Poinciana Way
Palm Beach, Florida 33480
(Address of principal executive offices)
  Telephone (561) 835-1800
(Registrant’s telephone number
including area code)
 

N/A
(former name)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such report), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes                           o No

The number of the Registrant’s common shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, outstanding on November 1, 2002 was 37,483,913.



Table of Contents

 

INNKEEPERS USA TRUST

INDEX

        Page Number
           
Part I.   Financial Information  
           
    Item 1.   Financial Statements  
           
        INNKEEPERS USA TRUST  
           
        Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2002 (unaudited) and December 31, 2001 1
           
        Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited) 2
           
        Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited) 3
           
        Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) 4
           
        INNKEEPERS HOSPITALITY  
           
        Combined Balance Sheets at September 30, 2002 (unaudited) and December 31, 2001 8
           
        Combined Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited) 9
           
        Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (unaudited) 10
           
        Notes to Combined Financial Statements (unaudited) 11
           
    Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13
           
    Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 23
           
    Item 4.   Controls and Procedures 24
           
Part II.   Other Information  
           
    Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 25

 
Signature 26
   
Certifications 27

i


Table of Contents

INNKEEPERS USA TRUST
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Innkeepers USA Trust
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

September 30,
2002
(unaudited)
December 31,
2001


         
ASSETS          
Investment in hotel properties:              
   Land and improvements   $ 101,134   $ 100,076  
   Buildings and improvements     653,477     652,899  
   Furniture and equipment     98,281     103,668  
   Renovations in process     12,445     241  
   Hotels held for sale     4,000      
   Hotels under development         8,998  


    869,337     865,882  
   Accumulated depreciation     (171,740 )   (154,574 )


   Net investment in hotel properties     697,597     711,308  
             
Cash and cash equivalents     22,728     5,077  
Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents     15,533     19,138  
Due from Lessees     11,263     10,264  
Deferred expenses, net     3,944     4,546  
Other assets     1,309     2,587  


     Total assets   $ 752,374   $ 752,920  


             
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY              
Debt   $ 237,726   $ 261,116  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses     9,409     8,376  
Distributions payable     5,907     3,176  
Deferred rent revenue     14,995      
Minority interest in Partnership     52,538     54,249  


     Total liabilities     320,575     326,917  


             
Shareholders’ equity:              
   Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 4,630,000
       shares issued and outstanding
    115,750     115,750  
   Common shares, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 37,483,913
       and 34,774,156 issued and outstanding, respectively
    375     348  
   Additional paid-in capital     393,323     367,596  
   Unearned compensation     (2,547 )   (3,482 )
   Distributions in excess of net earnings     (75,102 )   (54,209 )


     Total shareholders’ equity     431,799     426,003  


     Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 752,374   $ 752,920  



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1


Table of Contents

Innkeepers USA Trust
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,


2002
(unaudited)
2001
(unaudited)
2002
(unaudited)
2001
(unaudited)




Revenue:       (Note 4)       (Note 4)  
   Percentage Lease revenue   $ 21,637   $ 31,104   $ 54,519   $ 65,602  
   Other revenue     170     316     441     1,196  




     Total revenue     21,807     31,420     54,960     66,798  




                         
Expenses:                          
   Depreciation     8,973     9,942     27,879     29,807  
   Amortization of franchise costs     14     15     42     45  
   Ground rent     124     121     368     360  
   Interest expense     4,212     4,682     13,025     14,007  
   Amortization of loan origination fees     287     238     895     685  
   Property taxes and insurance     3,045     2,531     9,411     7,859  
   General and administrative, excluding amortization of
       unearned compensation
    796     671     2,842     2,734  
   Amortization of unearned compensation     337     336     1,010     1,014  
   Other charges     91         487     100  




     Total expenses     17,879     18,536     55,959     56,611  




                         
Income (loss) before minority interest, gain on sale of hotel
    and discontinued operations
    3,928     12,884     (999 )   10,187  
Minority interest, common     5     (348 )   423     20  
Minority interest, preferred     (1,069 )   (1,122 )   (3,205 )   (3,365 )
Gain on sale of hotel     530         530      
Discontinued operations     (1,510 )   35     (1,385 )   111  




Net income (loss)     1,884     11,449     (4,636 )   6,953  
Preferred share dividends     (2,496 )   (2,496 )   (7,488 )   (7,488 )




Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders     ($612 ) $ 8,953     ($12,124 )   ($535 )




                         
Earnings (loss) per share data:                          
   Basic – before discontinued operations   $ 0.02   $ 0.26     ($0.30 )   ($0.02 )
   Discontinued operations     (0.04 )   0.00     (0.04 )   (0.00 )




   Basic     ($0.02 ) $ 0.26     ($0.34 )   ($0.02 )




                         
   Diluted – before discontinued operations   $ 0.02   $ 0.26     ($0.30 )   ($0.02 )
   Discontinued operations     (0.04 )   0.00     (0.04 )   (0.00 )




   Diluted     ($0.02 ) $ 0.26     ($0.34 )   ($0.02 )





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents

Innkeepers USA Trust
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2002
(unaudited)
2001
(unaudited)


Cash flows from operating activities:              
   Net income (loss)     ($4,636 ) $ 6,953  
   Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:              
       Depreciation and amortization     30,034     31,771  
       Minority interests     2,782     3,345  
       Deferred rent revenue     14,995     19,504  
       Gain on sale of hotel     (530 )    
       Loss on hotel classified as held for sale     1,599      
       Changes in operating assets and liabilities:              
         Due from Lessees     (999 )   236  
         Other assets     1,278     301  
         Accounts payable and accrued expenses     1,283     441  


       Net cash provided by operating activities     45,806     62,551  


Cash flows from investing activities:              
   Investment in hotel properties     (27,975 )   (26,685 )
   Proceeds from sale of hotels     12,280      
   Net deposits into restricted cash accounts     3,605     28  
   Payments for franchise fees     (69 )    


       Net cash used by investing activities     (12,159 )   (26,657 )


Cash flows from financing activities:              
   Proceeds from debt issuance     4,000     19,500  
   Payments on debt     (27,390 )   (13,805 )
   Dividend reinvestment plan and shelf registration costs paid         (24 )
   Distributions paid to unit holders     (3,421 )   (4,616 )
   Distributions paid to shareholders     (13,609 )   (38,076 )
   Redemption of units     (236 )   (3,893 )
   Proceeds from issuance of common shares     24,926      
   Loan origination fees and costs paid     (266 )   (880 )


       Net cash used by financing activities     (15,996 )   (41,794 )


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents     17,651     (5,900 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     5,077     14,410  


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   $ 22,728   $ 8,510  


Supplemental cash flow information:              
   Interest paid   $ 13,065   $ 13,622  



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

Innkeepers USA Trust
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.       Organization

         Innkeepers USA Trust (“Innkeepers”) is a self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”) which, at September 30, 2002, owned 67 hotels with an aggregate of 8,196 rooms/suites (the “Hotels”) through its partnership interests in Innkeepers USA Limited Partnership (with its subsidiary partnerships, the “Partnership” and collectively with Innkeepers, the “Company”). The ownership of the Partnership at September 30, 2002 is as follows:

Common
Units
% Class A
Preferred
Units
% Class B
Preferred
Units
%






                                     
Innkeepers     37,483,913     96.98 %   4,630,000     100.00 %        
Third parties     1,167,893     3.02 %           3,884,469     100.00 %






Total     38,651,806     100.00 %   4,630,000     100.00 %   3,884,469     100.00 %







         The Hotels are comprised of 46 Residence Inn by Marriott hotels, 12 Hampton Inn hotels, five Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotels, one Sunrise Suites hotel, one TownePlace Suites by Marriott hotel, one Courtyard by Marriott hotel and one Holiday Inn Express hotel. The Hotels are located in 23 states, with 10 hotels located in California, five each in Washington, Florida, and Michigan, and four each in Illinois, Texas and New Jersey.

         At September 30, 2002, the Company leased 61 of the Hotels to Innkeepers Hospitality, Inc. (or other entities under common control, collectively, the “IH Lessee”) and six of the Hotels to affiliates of Wyndham International, Inc. (the “Summerfield Lessee” and, together with the IH Lessee, the “Lessees”) pursuant to leases (“Percentage Leases”). The Percentage Leases provide for rent based on the room revenues of the Hotels, subject to a specified minimum annual base rent for each Hotel. Jeffrey H. Fisher, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Trustees, controls the IH Lessee. Rolf E. Ruhfus, a trustee of the Company, is a director of Wyndham International, Inc. (“Wyndham”), which is the franchisor and/or operator of the Summerfield Suites by Wyndham and Sunrise Suites hotels.

         These unaudited financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We strongly encourage you to read these financial statements and the accompanying notes in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto of the Company and the IH Lessee included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (the “10-K”). Our annual report (which includes the 10-K) is posted on our website at www.innkeepersusa.com and the 10-K may be found at the SEC’s EDGAR website at www.sec.gov. The notes to the financial statements included herein highlight significant changes to the notes included in the 10-K and present interim disclosures required by the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Readers should be aware that the results of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

2.       Significant Developments

         During the first quarter of 2002, the Company negotiated an amendment to its $135 million unsecured Line of Credit (the “Line of Credit”). This amendment reset certain financial covenant thresholds for 2002 and increased the allowable percentage of total debt to implied value of the Hotels from 40% to 50%. The interest rate on the Line of Credit, as amended, is LIBOR plus 122.5 to 225 basis points. At September 30, 2002, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants contained in its various loan agreements, as amended, and there were no borrowings outstanding under the Line of Credit. If the Company violates the amended covenants, the Company may have to locate replacement financing for borrowings that may then be outstanding under the Line of Credit and/or significantly reduce its planned capital expenditures. On January 1, 2003 the Line of Credit covenants reset to the original covenants contained in the loan agreement prior to the amendment. However, the Company expects to negotiate amendments to the original covenants as necessary to allow the Company to comply with the covenants, as they may be further amended, during 2003.

4


Table of Contents

         During the second quarter of 2002, the Company completed the sale of 2,600,000 common shares in an underwritten public offering. The gross and net proceeds of the offering were $26,338,000 and $24,926,000, respectively. The net proceeds of the offering were used to repay borrowings outstanding under the Line of Credit.

         In July 2002, the Company completed the sale of the Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotel located in West Hollywood, CA for $12,800,000 and recognized a net gain on the sale of $530,000. The net proceeds of $12,280,000 from the sale were used for general working capital purposes.

3.       Earnings per Share

         The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands, except share and per share data):

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,


2002 2001 2002 2001




Numerator:                          
   Net income (loss)   $ 1,884   $ 11,449     ($4,636 ) $ 6,953  
   Preferred share dividends     (2,496 )   (2,496 )   (7,488 )   (7,488 )




   Net income (loss) applicable to common
       shareholders
    (612 ) $ 8,953     ($12,124 )   (535 )
   Discontinued operations     1,510     (35 )   1,385     (111 )




   Net income (loss) applicable to common
       shareholders
  $ 898   $ 8,918     ($10,739 )   ($646 )




                         
Denominator:                          
   Denominator for basic earnings per share –
       weighted average shares
    37,054,839     34,296,057     35,529,476     34,290,845  
   Effect of dilutive securities:                          
     Share options     724     65,445     22,201     79,201  
     Restricted shares     112,050     133,763     112,763     113,122  




   Denominator for diluted earnings per share –
       adjusted weighted average shares and assumed
       conversions
    37,167,613     34,495,265     35,664,440     34,483,168  




Earnings (loss) per share data:                          
   Basic – before discontinued operations   $ 0.02   $ 0.26     ($0.30 )   ($0.02 )
   Discontinued operations     (0.04 )   0.00     (0.04 )   0.00  




   Basic     ($0.02 ) $ 0.26     ($0.34 )   ($0.02 )




                         
   Basic – before discontinued operations   $ 0.02   $ 0.26     ($0.30 )   ($0.02 )
   Discontinued operations     (0.04 )   0.00     (0.04 )   0.00  




   Diluted     ($0.02 ) $ 0.26     ($0.34 )   ($0.02 )





         The conversion of Common Units into common shares would have no effect on loss per share. The Series A Preferred Shares, the Class B Preferred Units and 1,345,500 of the options granted by the Company to trustees and employees are anti-dilutive (i.e., assuming that they were converted would reduce the loss per share) and, therefore, are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For periods where a loss was incurred, the denominator used for calculating diluted earnings (loss) per share is the same as the denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share.

4.       Discontinued Operations

         During the third quarter of 2002, the Company classified one of its hotel properties as “held for sale.” The Company has stopped depreciation of the hotel and has classified it as held for sale in the accompanying September 30, 2002 balance sheet. The results of operations from this hotel are classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations. The previously reported 2001 results of operations have also been reclassified to reflect the classification of this hotel as held for sale. As a result of the held for sale classification, the Company has reduced the carrying value of this hotel to its estimated fair value (less costs to sell) of $4,000,000 and recognized an impairment loss of $1,599,000 during the current quarter.

5


Table of Contents

         The following table sets forth the components of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,


2002 2001 2002 2001




Percentage Lease revenue   $ 160   $ 131   $ 479   $ 390  
Other income                 1  
Depreciation     (52 )   (74 )   (208 )   (220 )
Property taxes and insurance     (19 )   (22 )   (57 )   (60 )
Impairment loss     (1,599 )       (1,599 )    




Discontinued operations     ($1,510 ) $ 35     ($1,385 ) $ 111  





5.       Commitments

         The Company completed the development of its 174-room Residence Inn by Marriott hotel in Saddle River, NJ and the hotel opened on September 15, 2002. The Company’s total investment in the hotel is approximately $22,800,000. The development costs were funded by borrowings under the Line of Credit and available cash. The Company has leased the hotel to the IH Lessee under a 5-year Percentage Lease.

         For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, the Company capitalized interest of $767,000 and $74,000, respectively, related to the development of this hotel.

6.       Related Party Transactions

         At December 31, 2001, in connection with the Company’s sale of its Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotel located in West Hollywood, CA, the Company accrued a $225,000 lease termination payment to be paid to the IH Lessee upon closing of the sale. The Company currently believes that the payment to the IH Lessee will be approximately $50,000.

         As a result of renovations made in January and February 2002 at the Company’s Holiday Inn Express hotel located in Lexington, MA which required that a substantial number of rooms be taken out of service, the Company agreed to compensate the IH Lessee for the significant loss of room nights by foregoing January and February 2002 base rents in the aggregate of $95,000 and paying $39,000 to offset a portion of the IH Lessee’s operating deficit for the hotel during that time period.

7.       Uncertainties

         In May 2000, the Company’s former Chief Operating Officer (who is a minority shareholder in certain of the IH Lessee entities) filed suit against the Company, certain IH Lessee entities and Mr. Fisher. Several claims brought against these and other, former defendants have been summarily dismissed or settled for nominal amounts ($100). The remaining claims in the suit allege that he was wrongfully terminated by the Company in breach of his employment contract with the Company, that he was wrongfully terminated by the IH Lessee in breach of his employment contract with the IH Lessee, and that Mr. Fisher breached certain fiduciary duties as a director and majority shareholder of certain of the IH Lessee entities. The Company, along with the IH Lessee and Mr. Fisher, is aggressively defending the remaining claim against it in the suit. The Company believes that if the suit is not settled or otherwise disposed of, it will be tried in a jury trial in early 2003. The Company has not recorded any loss provision relative to damages sought by the former executive other than an estimate of the legal costs of defense not expected to be covered by insurance policies.

         If the Company settled or lost the breach of employment contract claim, we estimate that we would be obligated to pay up to approximately $1,250,000 in cash, and to vest restricted shares which would result in a non-cash charge of up to approximately $1,175,000. This estimate includes only possible direct damages under the plaintiff’s breach of contract claim, for which the Company does not anticipate any insurance coverage, and includes no loss provision for related attorneys’ fees or other costs that may be recoverable by the plaintiff or pre-judgment interest on any judgment entered against the Company.

6


Table of Contents

         The Company has recognized $372,000 and $100,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, in costs related to defending this litigation. We may recognize additional costs related to this litigation in the remainder of 2002.

8.       Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

         The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 145 that changes the reporting of gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt and amends SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. The provisions of SFAS No. 145 related to the reporting of gains and losses from debt extinguishment must be applied in fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt, which was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented, that does not meet certain criteria for classification as an extraordinary item must be reclassified. We did not have any gains or losses on extinguishment of debt during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 or 2001 and, therefore, SFAS No. 145 had no effect on our financial statements.

         The FASB has also issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 addresses significant issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs that are associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that are currently accounted for pursuant to the guidance that the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) of the FASB has set forth in EITF Issue No 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” The scope of SFAS No. 146 also included (1) costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital lease and (2) termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an ongoing benefit arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. SFAS No. 146 will be effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We have not yet determined the impact of SFAS No. 146 on our results of operations and financial position.

7


Table of Contents

Innkeepers Hospitality
Combined Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)

September 30,
2002
(unaudited)
December 31, 2001


     
ASSETS              
Current assets:              
   Cash and cash equivalents   $ 14,915   $ 15,221  
   Marketable securities     2,617     3,102  
   Accounts receivable, net     7,344     3,920  
   Prepaid expenses     264     412  


     Total current assets     25,140     22,655  
             
Other assets     272     271  


     Total assets   $ 25,412   $ 22,926  


             
             
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY              
Current liabilities:              
   Accounts payable   $ 4,636   $ 4,330  
   Accrued expenses     4,058     4,292  
   Payable to Manager     5,216     2,269  
   Due to Partnership     10,518     9,852  


     Total current liabilities     24,428     20,743  
Other long-term liabilities     860     904  


     Total liabilities     25,288     21,647  


             
Shareholders’ equity:              
   Common shares, $1 par value, 9,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding     9     9  
   Additional paid-in capital     890     890  
   Unrealized loss on marketable securities     (826 )   (341 )
   Shareholder note receivable     (812 )    
   Retained earnings     863     721  


     Total shareholders’ equity     124     1,279  


     Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 25,412   $ 22,926  



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

8


Table of Contents

Innkeepers Hospitality
Combined Statements of Operations
(in thousands)

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,


2002
(unaudited)
2001
(unaudited)
2002
(unaudited)
2001
(unaudited)




Gross operating revenue:                          
   Rooms   $ 47,240   $ 50,260   $ 138,230   $ 158,077  
   Food and beverage     59     54     190     192  
   Telephone     798     1,196     2,605     3,650  
   Other     835     1,258     2,621     3,401  




     Gross operating revenue     48,932     52,768     143,646     165,320  
                         
Departmental expenses:                          
   Rooms     10,409     10,616     30,286     31,701  
   Food and beverage     76     63     222     210  
   Telephone     415     328     1,255     1,282  
   Other     369     434     1,145     1,289  




     Total departmental profit     37,663     41,327     110,738     130,838  




                         
Unallocated operating expenses:                          
   General and administrative     3,784     3,985     11,173     12,366  
   Franchise and marketing fees     3,083     3,315     9,033     10,271  
   Advertising and promotions     2,580     2,581     7,656     8,033  
   Utilities     2,173     2,150     6,198     6,501  
   Repairs and maintenance     2,450     2,278     6,985     7,003  
   Management fees     693     887     2,092     2,856  




     Total unallocated operating expenses     14,763     15,196     43,137     47,030  




                         
     Gross profit     22,900     26,131     67,601     83,808  
                         
Insurance     (331 )   (209 )   (1,067 )   (748 )
Lessee overhead     (1,119 )   (1,333 )   (3,755 )   (3,677 )
Percentage lease expense     (21,326 )   (23,431 )   (62,637 )   (75,393 )




                         
Net income (loss)     124     1,158     142     3,990  
Other comprehensive income - unrealized loss on
    marketable securities
    (454 )   (849 )   (485 )   (519 )




                         
Comprehensive income (loss)     ($330 ) $ 309     ($343 ) $ 3,471  





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

9


Table of Contents

Innkeepers Hospitality
Combined Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2002
(unaudited)
2001
(unaudited)


Cash flows from operating activities:      
   Net income   $ 142   $ 3,990  
   Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:              
     Depreciation     49     40  
     Changes in operating assets and liabilities:              
       Accounts receivable     (3,424 )   792  
       Prepaid expenses     148     (67 )
       Accounts payable     306     266  
       Accrued expenses     (234 )   (593 )
       Payable to Manager     2,947     (249 )
       Due to Partnership     666     (1,273 )


     Net cash provided by operating activities     600     2,906  


             
Cash flows from investing activities:              
   Repayment of advances from Partnership     (44 )   (77 )
   Purchase of property and equipment     (50 )   (205 )


     Net cash used by investing activities     (94 )   (282 )


             
Cash flows from financing activities:              
   Advances to shareholder     (812 )   (2,629 )
   Issuance of common shares         10  


     Net cash used by financing activities     (812 )   (2,619 )


             
   Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents     (306 )   5  
             
   Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     15,221     16,134  


             
   Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   $ 14,915   $ 16,139  



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

10


Table of Contents

Innkeepers Hospitality
Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.       Organization

         Innkeepers Hospitality, Inc. and other entities under common control (collectively, “IH” or the “IH Lessee”) are either majority (80%) or wholly-owned by Jeffrey H. Fisher and were formed primarily to lease and operate hotels owned by Innkeepers USA Trust (the “Company”). Mr. Fisher is the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Company. The IH Lessee leased 61 hotels (the “IH Leased Hotels”) from the Company at September 30, 2002.

         The IH Lessee operates 44 of the IH Leased Hotels and wholly owned subsidiaries of Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”) operate 17 of the IH Leased Hotels.

         These unaudited financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We strongly encourage you to read these financial statements and the accompanying notes in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto of the Company and the IH Lessee included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (the “10-K”). The Company’s 2001 annual report (which includes the 10-K) is posted on the Company’s website, at www.innkeepersusa.com, and the 10-K may be found at the SEC’s EDGAR website at www.sec.gov. The notes to the financial statements included herein highlight significant changes to the notes included in the 10-K and present interim disclosures required by the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Readers should be aware that the results of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

2.       Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

         Each IH Leased Hotel is leased by the Company to the IH Lessee under a percentage lease agreement (“Percentage Lease”). The Percentage Lease for each IH Leased Hotel provides for minimum base rent (“Base Rent”) and percentage rent (“Percentage Rent”) based on fixed percentages of annual room revenues below and in excess of certain annual specified levels (“Thresholds”). Base Rent is paid monthly and Percentage Rent is paid no later than 25 days after the end of each calendar quarter.

         The IH Lessee currently estimates that 14 of the IH Leased Hotels will pay only the minimum Base Rent in 2002. The remaining IH Leased Hotels will pay Percentage Rent that is in excess of the minimum Base Rent.

         The IH Lessee recognizes Percentage Lease expense for a hotel prior to the achievement of the annual Threshold when it is probable that the Threshold will be exceeded for the full year. Additionally, the IH Lessee recognizes Base Rent as Percentage Lease expense to the extent that it exceeds the calculated Percentage Lease payments (using in the calculation a prorated portion of the Threshold based on how much of the year has elapsed). This generally results in the recognition of Percentage Lease expense in an amount equal to the payments due under the Percentage Leases.

3.       Related Party Transaction

         The IH Lessee has a note receivable from its majority shareholder in the amount of $812,000 at September 30, 2002. Each advance under the note bears interest at the applicable federal rate in effect at the time of the advance and the note matures on March 1, 2003.

4.       Uncertainties

         In May 2000, the IH Lessee’s former President (who is a minority shareholder in certain of the IH Lessee entities and who also formerly was an officer of the Company) filed suit against the Company, certain IH Lessee entities and Mr. Fisher. Several claims against these and other, former defendants have been summarily dismissed or settled for nominal amounts ($100). The remaining claims in the suit allege that he was wrongfully terminated by the IH Lessee in breach of his employment contract with the IH Lessee, that he was wrongfully terminated by the Company in breach of his employment contract with the Company, and that Mr. Fisher breached certain fiduciary duties as a director and majority shareholder of certain of the IH Lessee entities. The IH Lessee, along with the

11


Table of Contents

Company and Mr. Fisher, is aggressively defending the remaining claim against it in the suit. The IH Lessee believes that if the suit is not settled or otherwise disposed of, it will be tried in a jury trial in early 2003. The IH Lessee has not recorded any loss provision relative to damages sought by the former executive other than an estimate of the legal costs of defense not expected to be covered by insurance policies.

         If the IH Lessee settled or lost the breach of employment contract claim, the IH Lessee estimates that it could be obligated to pay up to approximately $500,000 in cash. This estimate includes only possible direct damages under the plaintiff’s breach of contract claim, for which the IH Lessee does not anticipate any insurance coverage, and includes no loss provision for related attorneys’ fees or other costs that may be recoverable by the plaintiff or pre-judgment interest on any judgment entered against the IH Lessee.

5.       Resolution of Litigation with Former Vice President of Operations

         In September 2001, the IH Lessee terminated its former Vice President of Operations and, in November 2001, this former officer filed for arbitration claiming a breach of his employment agreement. The arbitrator awarded the former Vice President of Operations approximately $250,000 plus certain attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the plaintiff. The IH Lessee has recorded an expense for this award. The IH Lessee is considering disputing certain amounts awarded to this former officer. To the extent that disputes are resolved in the IH Lessee’s favor, the previously recorded expense will be reversed and recorded as income in subsequent reporting periods.

12


Table of Contents

INNKEEPERS USA TRUST
ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

         The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with (a) the financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report and (b) Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto of the Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (the “10-K”). An investment in the Company is subject to significant risks, which the Company discloses in reports filed from time to time with the SEC, including a discussion of “Risk Factors” included in the 10-K. The Company’s 2001 annual report (including the 10-K) is posted on the Company’s website at www.innkeepersusa.com, and the 10-K may be found at the SEC’s EDGAR website at www.sec.gov.

         The following chart sets forth certain information with respect to the Hotels at September 30, 2002:

Franchise Affiliation Number of
Hotels
Number of
Rooms/Suites



Upscale Extended-Stay              
   Residence Inn by Marriott     46     5,489  
   Summerfield Suites by Wyndham     5     650  
   Sunrise Suites     1     96  


    52     6,235  


Mid-Priced              
   Hampton Inn     12     1,526  
   Courtyard by Marriott     1     136  
   TownePlace Suites by Marriott     1     95  
   Holiday Inn Express     1     204  


    15     1,961  


    67     8,196  



         Occupancy, average daily rate (“ADR”) and revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) for all 67 of the Hotels are presented in the following table. No assurance can be given that the trends reflected in the following table will continue or that occupancy, ADR and RevPAR will not decrease due to changes in national or local economic, hospitality or other industry conditions.

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Percentage
increase
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Percentage
increase


2002 2001 (decrease) 2002 2001 (decrease)






Portfolio (1)                                      
ADR   $ 95.59   $ 103.90     (8.0 )% $ 95.63   $ 108.66     (12.0 )%
Occupancy     74.8 %   73.9 %   1.2     73.3 %   75.0 %   (2.2 )
RevPAR   $ 71.50   $ 76.82     (6.9 ) $ 70.14   $ 81.48     (13.9 )
                                     
By Segment                                      
Upscale Extended-Stay Hotels (2)                                      
   ADR   $ 98.08   $ 107.99     (9.2 ) $ 97.75   $ 113.17     (13.6 )
   Occupancy     79.3 %   77.2 %   2.8     77.3 %   77.5 %   (0.3 )
   RevPAR   $ 77.79   $ 83.33     (6.7 ) $ 75.56   $ 87.74     (13.9 )
                                     
Mid-Priced Hotels (3)                                      
   ADR   $ 85.54   $ 88.60     (3.5 ) $ 87.25   $ 92.37     (5.5 )
   Occupancy     60.8 %   64.0 %   (4.9 )   61.0 %   67.0 %   (9.0 )
   RevPAR   $ 52.03   $ 56.66     (8.2 ) $ 53.20   $ 61.92     (14.1 )

    (1)   67 hotels

    (2)   52 hotels

    (3)   15 hotels

13


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

         In accordance with recent SEC guidance, we discuss below material accounting policies that the Company believes are critical to an investor’s understanding of its financial results and condition, and require management to make complex judgments and/or assessments of risks. Information regarding these and certain other accounting policies is included in the notes to the Company’s financial statements included in the 10-K.

Allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company has not recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts. Substantially all of the Company’s receivables at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 were comprised of rent due from the Lessees under the Percentage Leases (“Rent”), which was fully paid in October 2002 and January 2002, respectively. Historically, the Company has not experienced any losses on the Lessees’ receivables. However, the Lessees rely primarily on cash flow from their operation of the hotels to pay rent, and collection of future receivables from the Lessees, therefore, cannot be assured.

Insurance. The Company and the Lessees have obtained property, casualty and other insurance with loss limits and coverages deemed reasonable by management (and with the intent to satisfy the requirements of lenders and franchisors). There can be no assurance that the insurance obtained will fully protect the Company against insurable losses (i.e., our losses may exceed our coverage limits), that the Company will not incur losses from risks that are not insurable (i.e., losses from mold or other environmental causes, acts of terror, war, riot, etc.) or that are not economically insurable; or that current coverages will continue to be available at reasonable rates. As of September 30, 2002, we believe that our “all risk” property coverages insured against certain losses from acts of terror, but it is possible that our carriers would challenge our right to coverage or the applicable limits in the event we made a claim based on a terrorist event. Moreover, under most circumstances, terrorism coverage has been expressly excluded from our property coverages as of November 1, 2002 (our policy renewal date). We are currently evaluating whether to purchase terrorism coverage and, if so, on what terms (including deductibles, which would likely be substantial) and with what policy limits. We believe that, currently, we could obtain terrorism insurance with a reasonable policy limit if we decide or are required to. We have not concluded that our loan agreements require such coverage, but one or more lenders may insist that it is required. In that case, as with any insurance coverage that we do not have that a lender properly deems is required, if we do not or cannot obtain it the lender may procure it directly. If the lender procures a coverage and we do not pay or reimburse the lenders for such coverage (although we do not anticipate such an event), the lender may declare a default under the loan agreement. Depending on our access to capital, liquidity and the value of the properties securing the affected loan(s) in relation to the balance(s) of the loan(s), a default could have a material adverse affect on our results of operations and ability to obtain future financing. Likewise, one or more large uninsured or underinsured losses could have a material adverse affect on us. We currently believe, given our discussions with participants in the insurance markets, and the nature, physical characteristics and locations of our assets, that we have adequate coverages under our insurance policies (although, as noted above, we likely would have no coverage currently for losses caused by acts of terror).

Long-Lived Assets. Hotel properties are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Useful lives are based on management’s estimates of the period over which the assets will generate revenue.

         The Company reviews its hotel properties for “impairment” whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the value of the assets on our books may not be fully recoverable. The Company reviewed each of its hotel properties at December 31, 2001 for impairment and, based on its estimate of each hotel’s future undiscounted cash flows, determined that no impairment existed at December 31, 2001. However, if the estimate of the future cash flows were to decrease in future periods, the Company may be required to recognize an impairment in such period and the impairment may be significant.

         The Company classified the Summerfield Suites by Wyndham in West Hollywood, CA as “held for sale” at December 31, 2001. Held for sale properties are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the estimated fair value less costs to sell. Based on this criteria, the Company recognized a loss of $250,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001 on this hotel. The sale of this hotel closed on July 24, 2002 and the Company recognized a gain on the sale of this hotel of $530,000 in the 2002 third quarter due to the expenses of the sale being less than expected.

         The Company has classified another one of its hotels as “held for sale” at September 30, 2002. Based on this classification, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $1,599,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2002 on this hotel. The actual loss that may be incurred on the sale of this hotel may be more or less than the estimated loss based on the final sales price and/or the actual costs incurred during the sales process.

14


Table of Contents

REIT Qualification Tests. The Company is subject to numerous operational and organizational requirements to maintain its REIT status. Based on tests performed by management for the year ended December 31, 2001 and for the first, second and third quarters of 2002, the Company believes that it satisfied the requirements needed to maintain its REIT status. However, the Company is subject to audit and if the taxing authorities determined that the Company failed one or more of these tests, the Company could lose its REIT status. If the Company did not qualify as a REIT, its income would become subject to federal and state income taxes, which would be substantial, and the resulting adverse affects on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity and amounts distributable to shareholders would be material.

Accrual for Certain Litigation Settlements and Costs. In May 2000, the Company’s former Chief Operating Officer (who is a minority shareholder in certain of the IH Lessee entities) filed suit against the Company, certain IH Lessee entities and Mr. Fisher. Several claims brought against these and other, former defendants have been summarily dismissed or settled for nominal amounts ($100). The remaining claims in the suit allege that he was wrongfully terminated by the Company in breach of his employment contract with the Company, that he was wrongfully terminated by the IH Lessee in breach of his employment contract with the IH Lessee, and that Mr. Fisher breached certain fiduciary duties as a director and majority shareholder of certain of the IH Lessee entities. The Company, along with the IH Lessee and Mr. Fisher, is aggressively defending the remaining claim against it in the suit. The Company believes that if the suit is not settled or otherwise disposed of, it will be tried in a jury trial in early 2003. The Company has not recorded any loss provision relative to damages sought by the former executive other than an estimate of the legal costs of defense not expected to be covered by insurance policies.

         If the Company settled or lost the breach of employment contract claim, we estimate that we would be obligated to pay up to approximately $1,250,000 in cash, and to vest restricted shares which would result in a non-cash charge of up to approximately $1,175,000. This estimate includes only possible direct damages under the plaintiff’s breach of contract claim, for which the Company does not anticipate any insurance coverage, and includes no loss provision for related attorneys’ fees or other costs that may be recoverable by the plaintiff or pre-judgment interest on any judgment entered against the Company.

         The Company has recognized $372,000 and $100,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, in costs related to defending this litigation. We may recognize additional costs related to this litigation in the remainder of 2002.

Results of Operations

Deferred Recognition of Percentage Lease Revenue under SAB 101

         The SEC has issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (“SAB 101”), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SAB 101 provides that a lessor shall defer recognition of contingent rental income in interim periods until specified annual targets that trigger the contingent income are met. The Company reviewed the terms of its Percentage Leases and determined that the provisions of SAB 101 apply to the Company’s revenue recognition on an interim basis but have no impact on the Company’s annual Percentage Lease revenue recognition or its receipt of interim payments under the Percentage Leases from the Lessees. The Company’s quarterly distributions are based on Percentage Rent collected or due from the Lessees under the Percentage Leases (among other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Trustees), rather than Percentage Lease revenue recognized under SAB 101.

         The effect of the application of SAB 101 on the financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2002 was to decrease Percentage Lease revenue by $2,073,000. The effect of the application of SAB 101 on the financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2001 was to increase Percentage Lease revenue by $4,702,000. “Deferred Rent Revenue” represents Percentage Rent collected or due from the Lessees under the terms of the Percentage Leases that the Company expects to recognize as Percentage Lease revenue in the fourth quarter. At September 30, 2002 and 2001, “Deferred rent revenue” was $14,995,000 and $19,504,000, respectively,.

         For comparability purposes only, assuming that the amount included in “Deferred rent revenue” at September 30, 2002 and 2001 were recognized as Percentage Lease revenue at those dates, the Company would have had Percentage Lease revenue of $69,514,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $85,106,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

15


Table of Contents

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 (“2002”) to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2001 (“2001”)

         The decrease in Percentage Lease revenue for 2002 from 2001 is due primarily to the decreased room revenues at the Hotels, which resulted primarily from a slowing economy beginning in early 2001 and the materially adverse affects that the September 11, 2001 attacks had, and continue to have, on travel, particularly business travel that historically has driven the Company’s business. The decreased room revenue resulted in less Percentage Rent being recognized in the 2002 third quarter. The decrease in Percentage Rent was partially offset by an increase in Base Rent. Generally, on January 1 of each year, the Base Rent and room revenue threshold for each hotel increases based on the change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (the “CPI”) for the previous year.

         Depreciation, amortization of franchise costs, amortization of loan origination fees, and amortization of unearned compensation (“Depreciation and Amortization”) were $9,611,000 in the aggregate for 2002 compared with $10,531,000 for 2001. The decrease in Depreciation and Amortization was primarily due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated in 2001 and the reduction in depreciation due to the sale of the Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotel located in West Hollywood, CA, partially offset by the depreciation of renovations completed during 2001 and the amortization of the costs incurred in obtaining the Line of Credit covenant amendment.

         Interest expense for 2002 was $4,212,000, compared with $4,682,000 for 2001. This decrease is due primarily to principal reductions on the Company’s amortizing debt, the repayment of all borrowings outstanding on the Line of Credit in early June 2002, the capitalization of interest on the Company’s development costs incurred on the Saddle River, NJ project and decreases in the interest rates on the Company’s variable rate debt.

         Property taxes and insurance increased by $514,000, or 20%, in 2002, compared with 2001. This increase was due primarily to a $346,000 increase in insurance premiums, an increase in the accruals of certain hotels’ real estate taxes and the receipt in 2001 of certain real estate tax refunds that were not present in 2002. The Company has renewed its insurance policies effective November 1, 2002 and the premiums have increased an average of 19% from the previous policy year.

         General and administrative expenses increased by $125,000, or 19%, in 2002, compared with 2001 and increased as a percentage of total revenue to 3.7% in 2002 from 2.1% in 2001. This increase primarily resulted from the elimination of the bonus accrual for the Company’s executives in 2001 partially offset by the elimination of a $125,000 reserve for certain federal taxes in 2002. The increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues is due to the above and the lower total revenues in 2002 compared to 2001.

         Other charges included an accrual of $91,000 for legal costs related to the litigation with the Company’s former Chief Operating Officer.

         The Company recognized a $530,000 gain in 2002 from the sale of its Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotel located in West Hollywood, CA in July 2002.

         The Company has recorded an impairment loss (which is included in “discontinued operations” in the statements of operations) of $1,599,000 on a hotel it has classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2002.

         Net loss applicable to common shareholders for 2002 was ($612,000), or ($0.02) per diluted share, compared with net income of $8,953,000, or $0.26 per diluted share, for 2001. This change is due primarily to the factors discussed previously.

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 (“2002”) to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001 (“2001”)

         The decrease in Percentage Lease revenue for 2002 from 2001 is due primarily to the decreased room revenues at the Hotels, which resulted in less Percentage Rent being recognized in 2002 partially offset by the increase in Base Rent as of January 1, 2002. Generally on January 1 of each year, the Base Rent for each hotel increases based on the change in the CPI for the previous year.

         Depreciation and Amortization was $29,826,000 in the aggregate for 2002, compared with $31,551,000 for 2001. The decrease in Depreciation and Amortization was primarily due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated

16


Table of Contents

in 2001, the suspension of depreciation on the Company’s hotel that is classified as held for sale and the reduction in depreciation due to the sale of the Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotel located in West Hollywood, CA, partially offset by the depreciation of renovations completed during 2001 and the amortization of the costs incurred in obtaining the Line of Credit covenant amendment.

         Interest expense for 2002 was $13,025,000, compared with $14,007,000 for 2001. This decrease is due primarily to principal reductions on the Company’s amortizing debt, the repayment of all borrowings outstanding on the Line of Credit in early June 2002, the capitalization of interest on the Company’s development costs incurred on the Saddle River, NJ project and decreases in the interest rates on the Company’s variable rate debt.

         Property taxes and insurance increased by $1,552,000, or 20%, in 2002, compared with 2001. This increase was due primarily to a $976,000 increase in insurance premiums, the receipt in 2001 of $336,000 in real estate tax refunds which were not present in 2002 and an increase in the accrual for certain hotels’ real estate taxes.

         General and administrative expenses remained relatively constant in 2002, compared with 2001 and increased as a percentage of total revenue to 5.2% in 2002 from 4.1% in 2001. The increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues is due to the lower total revenues in 2002 compared to 2001.

         Other charges were $487,000 in 2002 and $100,000 in 2001. In 2002 and 2001, the Company accrued $372,000 and $100,000, respectively, for legal costs related to the litigation with the Company’s former Chief Operating Officer. In 2002, the Company accrued $115,000 in costs for legal and investment bank advisory services rendered to a special committee of the Company’s Board of Trustees that is considering the Company’s alternatives under the REIT Modernization Act.

         The Company recognized a $530,000 gain in 2002 from the sale of its Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotel located in West Hollywood, CA in July 2002.

         The Company has recorded an impairment loss (which is included in “discontinued operations” in the statements of operations) of $1,599,000 on a hotel it has classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2002.

         Net loss applicable to common shareholders for 2002 was $(12,124,000), or $(0.34) per diluted share, compared with $(535,000), or $(0.02) per diluted share, for 2001. This change is due primarily to the factors discussed previously.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

         The Company’s principal source of liquidity is rent payments from the Lessees under the Percentage Leases, and the Company is dependent on the Lessees to make such payments to provide cash for debt service, distributions, capital expenditures at its Hotels, and working capital. The Company does not expect that its cash provided by operating activities will be adequate to meet all of its liquidity needs. The Company currently expects to fund any liquidity shortfall and its external growth objectives primarily by borrowing on its Line of Credit or other facilities, exchanging equity for hotel properties or possibly accessing the capital markets if market conditions permit.

         The IH Lessee, which leases 61 of the Company’s hotels, reported net income of $142,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The IH Lessee currently anticipates that its net income for the full year ended December 31, 2002 will be approximately break-even. If actual results for the final quarter of the year are worse than anticipated, the IH Lessee may borrow on a margin account that is collateralized by 247,450 common shares and 20,500 preferred shares of the Company. The IH Lessee may borrow up to 50% of the current market value of the common and preferred shares. There is no assurance that the IH Lessee may be able to borrow under the margin account or that the lender will not demand repayment of outstanding borrowings under the margin account. Currently, the margin account has no outstanding balance. The IH Lessee is currently negotiating a line of credit with a major commercial bank. There can be no assurance that the IH Lessee will successfully complete this negotiation process.

         The Summerfield Lessee leases six of the Hotels (the “Wyndham-Leased Hotels”) that are not leased by the IH Lessee, under Percentage Leases. The obligations of the Summerfield Lessee under its Percentage Leases and related agreements are collateralized by $4,759,220 in irrevocable letters of credit, one of which is pledged to a lender, and are guaranteed by Wyndham. Wyndham’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 states that Wyndham has shareholders’ equity in excess of $1 billion. However, the Wyndham 10-Q also reflects a net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 of over $500 million. As a result, we believe that Wyndham relies exclusively on the cash flow of the Wyndham-Leased Hotels to generate sufficient cash flow to permit the Wyndham Lessee to pay rent and satisfy its capital expenditure and other obligations under its Percentage Leases.

Cash Flow Analysis

         Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents) at September 30, 2002 and 2001 were $38,261,000 and $27,149,000, including $6,439,000 and $7,636,000, respectively, which the Company is required, under the Percentage Leases, to make available to the Lessees for the replacement and

17


Table of Contents

refurbishment of furniture and equipment and certain other capital expenditures. Additionally, cash and cash equivalents included $9,094,000 and $11,003,000 at September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, that is held in escrow by lenders to pay for insurance, taxes, and capital expenditures for certain Hotels. The increase in cash balances is due primarily to the net proceeds from the sale of the Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotel located in West Hollywood, CA of $12,280,000.

         Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 was $45,806,000 and $62,551,000, respectively. The $16,745,000 decrease is primarily due to the $15,592,000 reduction in Rent paid or payable under the Percentage Leases for the first nine months of 2002, as compared to the first nine months of 2001.

         Net cash used in investing activities was $12,159,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. This was comprised primarily of (a) renovations at certain hotels of $14,220,000 and (b) costs on the Company’s hotel development in Saddle River, NJ of $13,824,000 (including franchise fees of $69,000), which were partially offset by (i) the net proceeds from the sale of the Summerfield Suites by Wyndham hotel located in West Hollywood, CA of $12,280,000 and (ii) withdrawals of $3,605,000 in cash from certain restricted cash accounts for renovations completed during the period.

         Net cash used in investing activities was $26,657,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. This was comprised primarily of (a) renovations at certain hotels of $19,862,000; (b) development costs on the Company’s project in Tyson’s Corner, VA of $1,496,000, and (c) costs on the Company’s hotel development in Saddle River, NJ of $5,312,000.

         Net cash used by financing activities was $15,996,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, consisting primarily of (a) distributions paid of $17,030,000; (b) the redemption of 22,909 Common Units in the Partnership for $236,000; (c) loan costs paid of $266,000; (d) net repayments on the Line of Credit of $21,000,000; and (e) principal payments on amortizing debt of $2,390,000, which were partially offset by $24,926,000 of proceeds from the issuance of 2,600,000 common shares.

         Net cash used by financing activities was $41,794,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, consisting primarily of (a) distributions paid of $42,692,000; (b) the redemption of 178,860 Preferred Units and 152,574 Common Units in the Partnership for $3,893,000; (c) the repayment of a mortgage that matured of $3,027,000; (d) loan costs paid of $637,000; and (e) principal payments on amortizing debt of $2,277,000, which were partially offset by net borrowings under the Line of Credit of $11,000,000.

Distributions/Dividends

         The Company has paid regular distributions on its common shares and Common Units, and each of the 2002 first, second and third quarter distributions was $0.08 per share or unit. Quarterly preferred distributions of between $0.275 and $0.28875 are payable on each Class B Preferred Unit and each of the 2002 first, second and third quarter distributions was $0.275. Each Series A Preferred Share is entitled to annual dividends equal to the greater of (i) $2.15624 ($0.53906 payable quarterly) or (ii) the cash dividend paid or payable on the number of common shares into which a Series A Preferred Share is then convertible (1.48611). The Company paid a dividend of $0.53906 on each Series A Preferred Share for each of the 2002 first, second and third quarters. The timing and amount of any future dividends will be determined by the Company’s Board of Trustees in its sole discretion based on factors it deems relevant and no assurance can be given that the current dividend levels will be sustained. The holders of the Common Units and Class B Preferred Units may redeem each of their units for cash equal to the then-trading value of a common share or, at the election of Innkeepers, one common share. Under federal income tax law provisions applicable to REITs, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to maintain its REIT status. The Company’s current policy is to distribute 100% of its taxable income.

Financing

         In making future investments in hotel properties, the Company may incur additional indebtedness. The Company may also incur indebtedness to meet distribution requirements imposed on a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, to fund its renovation and upgrade program or to fund any other liquidity needs to the extent that working capital and cash flow from the Company’s operations are insufficient to fund such needs. The Company’s Declaration of Trust limits aggregate indebtedness to 50% of the Company’s investment in hotel properties, at cost,

18


Table of Contents

after giving effect to the Company’s use of proceeds from any indebtedness. The Company has bank-funding commitments available under the Line of Credit of approximately $125,000,000 at September 30, 2002. However, the actual amount that can be borrowed is subject to borrowing base availability as described in the loan agreement. During the first quarter, the Company negotiated an amendment to the Line of Credit. This amendment reset certain financial covenant thresholds for 2002 and increased the allowable percentage of total debt to implied value of the Hotels from 40% to 50%. The interest rate on the Line of Credit, as amended, is LIBOR plus 122.5 to 225 basis points. At September 30, 2002, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants contained in its various loan agreements, as amended, and there were no borrowings outstanding under the Line of Credit. If the operating environment in 2002 worsens substantially from the current trends and the Company violates the amended covenants, the Company may have to locate replacement financing for borrowings that may then be outstanding under the Line of Credit and/or significantly reduce its other planned capital expenditures. On January 1, 2003 the Line of Credit covenants reset to the original covenants contained in the loan agreement prior to the amendment. The Company expects to negotiate amendments to the original covenants as necessary to allow the Company to comply with the covenants, as they may be further amended, during 2003. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will successfully complete such negotiations.

         The following table summarizes certain information concerning the Company’s debt at September 30, 2002 and 2001:

2002 2001


Investment in hotels, at cost   $ 869,337,000   $ 855,725,000  
Debt     237,726,000     251,880,000  
Percentage of debt to investment in hotels, at cost     27.3 %   29.4 %
Percentage of fixed rate debt to total debt     95.8 %   91.7 %
Weighted average interest rates on:              
   Fixed rate debt     7.54 %   7.54 %
   Variable rate debt     1.35 %   3.91 %
   Total debt     7.28 %   7.24 %
             
Number of hotels properties:              
   Encumbered     39     39  
   Unencumbered     28     28  
Debt Service Coverage Ratios              
   Interest coverage ratio (EBITDA divided by interest
       expense)
    4.2 x   5.5 x
   Fixed charge coverage ratio (EBITDA divided by fixed
       charges)
    1.7 x   2.2 x
   Total debt to EBITDA     3.2 x   2.5 x

         The Company includes the following in fixed charges for purposes of calculating the fixed charge coverage ratio: interest expense, dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares, distributions on the Class B Preferred Units, principal amortization, and a furniture, fixtures and equipment replacement reserve calculated at 4% of room revenue at the Hotels. The Company includes rent deferred under SAB 101 in its calculation of EBITDA.

         In the future, the Company may seek to increase or decrease the amount of its credit facilities, negotiate additional credit facilities, or issue corporate debt instruments, all in compliance with the Company’s debt limitation. Any debt incurred or issued by the Company may be secured or unsecured, short-term or long-term, bear a fixed or variable interest rate and may be subject to such other terms as management or the Board of Trustees of the Company deems prudent. The Company has no interest rate hedging instrument exposure or forward equity commitments.

Capital Expenditures

         The Percentage Leases generally require the Company to make available to the Lessees an amount equal to 4% of room revenues from the Hotels, on a monthly basis, for the periodic replacement or refurbishment of furniture, fixtures and equipment and certain other capital expenditures at the Hotels. Each of the Company’s term loans require that the Company make available for such purposes, at the Hotels collateralizing those loans, amounts up to 5% of gross revenues from such Hotels. The Company intends to cause the expenditure of amounts in excess of such obligated amounts, if necessary, to comply with the reasonable requirements of any franchise agreement and otherwise to the extent that the Company deems such expenditures to be in the best interests of the Company.

19


Table of Contents

         Management believes that the amounts required to be made available by the Company under the Percentage Leases will be sufficient to meet most of the routine expenditures for furniture, fixtures and equipment at the Hotels. However, in the past, the Company has spent substantially more on capital expenditures than the Percentage Leases require. Management believed these additional expenditures were necessary to meet competitive pressures from other hotels, many of which are newly constructed. In many cases, the expenditures were also required by franchisors of the Hotels, such as Marriott’s requirements to substantially upgrade and “refresh” the Company’s Generation 1 Residence Inn by Marriott hotels. Management believes that for the foreseeable future the Company will continue to spend more on capital expenditures than it is required to make available to the Lessees under the Percentage Leases or loan agreements. The extent to which the actual expenditures exceed the amounts required to be made available will vary from year to year, based on a number of factors. Those factors include for any given year market and franchisor requirements, the point in the normal recurring upgrade cycle the hotels are at in that year, and the revenue of the hotels for that year. In 2002, management expects to spend $20 million on capital expenditures. To the extent that the Company spends more on capital expenditures than is available from the Company’s operations, the Company intends to borrow under the Line of Credit.

Related Party Transactions

         The Company has entered into a number of ongoing transactions and arrangements that may involve conflicts of interest. For a description of these transactions and arrangements, please see “Risk Factors-Conflicts of Interest and Related Party Transactions” beginning on page R-2 in the 10-K.

Seasonality of Hotel Business

         The hotel industry is seasonal in nature. Historically, the Hotels’ operations have generally reflected higher occupancy rates and ADR during the second and third quarters. To the extent that cash flow from the Percentage Leases for a quarter is insufficient to fund all of the distributions for such quarter due to seasonal and other factors, the Company may fund quarterly distributions with available cash or borrowings under the Line of Credit.

Inflation

         Operators of hotels, including the Lessees and any third-party managers retained by the Lessees, generally possess the ability to adjust room rates quickly. However, competitive pressures and other factors have limited and may in the future limit the ability of the Lessees and any third-party managers retained by the Lessees to raise room rates in response to inflation. In fact, despite inflation, room rates have decreased over the last two years. Inflation has been modest in the past few years. However, there can be no assurance that these modest inflation levels will not increase in future years or that the Company will not continue to be constrained from raising room rates.

Fund From Operations

         Funds From Operations (“FFO”) is a widely used performance measure for an equity REIT. FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, is income (loss) before minority interest, including any income or loss from discontinued operations, (determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (losses) from debt restructuring and sales of property and extraordinary items, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company has also included an adjustment for Percentage Rent deferred under SAB 101, as described in “-Results of Operations” above. FFO is presented to assist investors in analyzing the performance of the Company. The Company’s method of calculating FFO may be different from methods used by other REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. FFO (i) does not represent cash flows from operating activities as defined by generally accepted accounting principles, (ii) is not indicative of cash available to fund all cash flow and liquidity needs, including its ability to make distributions, and (iii) should not be considered as an alternative to net income (as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) for purposes of evaluating the Company’s operating performance.

20


Table of Contents

         The following presents the Company’s calculations of FFO and the denominator for FFO per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands, except share data):

Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,


2002 2001 2002 2001




Net income (loss) applicable to common
    shareholders
    ($612 ) $ 8,953     ($12,124 )   ($535 )
Minority interest, common     (5 )   348     (423 )   (20 )
Minority interest, preferred     1,069     1,122     3,205     3,365  
Gain on sale of hotel     (530 )       (530 )    
Impairment loss on held for sale hotel     1,599         1,599      
Depreciation     9,025     10,016     28,087     30,027  
Preferred share dividends     2,496     2,496     7,488     7,488  
Deferred rent revenue     2,073     (4,702 )   14,995     19,504  




FFO   $ 15,115   $ 18,233   $ 42,297   $ 59,829  




                         
Denominator for diluted earnings per share     37,167,613     34,495,265     35,664,440     34,483,168  
Weighted average                          
   Common Units     1,207,613     1,298,396     1,252,928     1,330,596  
   Preferred Units     3,884,469     3,884,469     3,884,469     3,904,124  
   Convertible preferred shares     6,857,493     6,857,493     6,857,493     6,857,493  




Denominator for FFO per share     49,117,188     46,535,623     47,659,330     46,575,381  





Forward-Looking Statements

         This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws including, without limitation, statements containing the words “estimates,” “projects,” “anticipates”, “expects” and words of similar import. Such forward-looking statements relate to future events and the future financial performance of the Company and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from the results or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company is not obligated to update any such factors or to reflect the impact of actual future events or developments or such forward-looking statements.

         Cautionary statements set forth in reports filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC discuss important factors with respect to such forward-looking statements. These factors include, without limitation, (i) risks that disruptions in oil imports or higher oil prices, changes in domestic or international political environments, war, terrorism or similar activity would have results that could negatively affect the travel industry and/or Company in ways and to an extent that cannot be anticipated, (ii) the relative strength and performance of businesses and industries that are important demand generators in the Company’s key markets, (iii) international, national, regional and local economic conditions that will, among other things, affect demand for the Company’s hotel rooms and the availability and terms of financing, (iv) the Company’s ability to maintain its properties in competitive condition, (v) the Company’s ability to acquire or develop additional properties and risks that potential acquisitions or developments may not perform in accordance with expectations, (vi) changes in travel patterns, pricing methods and mechanisms, or the prevailing means of commerce, i.e., e-commerce, and (vii) the complex tax rules that the company must satisfy to qualify as a REIT, and other governmental regulation. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurances that our expectations will be attained or that any deviations will not be material.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

         The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 145 that changes the reporting of gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt and amends SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. The provisions of SFAS No. 145 related to the reporting of gains and losses from debt extinguishment must be applied in fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. Any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt, which was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods presented, that does not meet certain criteria for classification as an extraordinary item must be reclassified. We did not have any gains or losses

21


Table of Contents

on extinguishment of debt during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 or 2001 and, therefore, SFAS No. 145 had no effect on our financial statements.

         The FASB has also issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 addresses significant issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs that are associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that are currently accounted for pursuant to the guidance that the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) of the FASB has set forth in EITF Issue No 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” The scope of SFAS No. 146 also included (1) costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital lease and (2) termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an ongoing benefit arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. SFAS No. 146 will be effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We have not yet determined the impact of SFAS No. 146 on our results of operations and financial position.

22


Table of Contents

INNKEEPERS USA TRUST
ITEM 3 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

         The Company’s primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates on its Line of Credit and other debt. At September 30, 2002, the Company had total outstanding indebtedness of approximately $237,726,000. The Company’s interest rate risk objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, the Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in market interest rates for a portion of its borrowings through the use of fixed rate debt instruments to the extent that reasonably favorable rates are obtainable with such arrangements. The Company may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps or caps and treasury options or locks to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial instrument or to effectively lock the interest rate on a portion of its variable rate debt. Currently, the Company has no derivative financial instruments. The Company does not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. Approximately 95.8% of the Company’s outstanding debt was subject to fixed rates with a weighted average interest rate of 7.54% at September 30, 2002. The Company regularly reviews interest rate exposure on its outstanding borrowings in an effort to minimize the risk of interest rate fluctuations.

         For debt obligations outstanding at September 30, 2002, the following table presents principal repayments and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates (in thousands):

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Thereafter Total Fair
Value








Fixed rate debt   $ 1,076   $ 4,563   $ 4,890   $ 5,891   $ 6,408   $ 204,898   $ 227,726   $ 227,726  
   Average interest
       rate
    7.57 %   7.56 %   7.57 %   7.59 %   7.59 %   7.54 %   7.54 %    
   Variable rate
       debt
                      $ 10,000   $ 10,000   $ 10,000  
   Average interest
       rate
                        1.35 %   1.35 %    

         The table incorporates only those exposures that existed as of September 30, 2002 and does not consider exposures or positions that could arise after that date. As a result, the Company’s ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the future period, prevailing interest rates, and the Company’s hedging strategies at that time. There is inherent rollover risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and the Company’s financing requirements.

         The Company’s Line of Credit, which currently has no outstanding borrowings under it, matures in July 2004. All of our other debt matures in 2007 or thereafter.

23


Table of Contents

INNKEEPERS USA TRUST
ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Innkeepers USA Trust

         Within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this report, the Company evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management (including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer), the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14.

         Based on their evaluation of such disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that such controls were effective as of November 14, 2002, are operating as designed and will alert them on a timely basis to any material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.

         There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Innkeepers Hospitality

         The following information has been provided to the Company by Innkeepers Hospitality (“IH”)

          Within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this report, IH evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of the IH’s management (including its vice president of accounting), the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures.

         Based on IH management’s evaluation of such disclosure controls and procedures, IH’s vice president of accounting has informed the Company that he has concluded that such controls were effective as of November 14, 2002, are operating as designed and will alert him on a timely basis to any material information relating to IH required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.

         There have been no significant changes in IH’s internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

24


Table of Contents

INNKEEPERS USA TRUST
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

         (a)      Exhibits – None.

         (b)      Reports on Form 8-K – The Company filed with the SEC a Current Report on Form 8-K on August 14, 2002 that contained the certifications of Jeffrey H. Fisher, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and David Bulger, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

25


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

    INNKEEPERS USA TRUST

November 14, 2002
   
/s/ GREGORY M. FAY

      Gregory M. Fay
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

26


Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

(a)      CEO Certification

I, Jeffrey H. Fisher, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innkeepers USA Trust;
     
2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
     
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

  a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     
  b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
     
  c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

  a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     
  b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 14, 2002      

   
/s/ JEFFREY H. FISHER

      Jeffrey H. Fisher
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

27


Table of Contents

(b)      CFO Certification

I, David Bulger, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innkeepers USA Trust;
     
2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
     
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     
  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
     
  c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     
  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.   The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 14, 2002      

   
/s/ DAVID BULGER

      David Bulger
Chief Financial Officer

28


Table of Contents

(c)      Innkeepers Hospitality Vice President of Accounting

I, Roger Pollak, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innkeepers USA Trust;
     
2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact relating to Innkeepers Hospitality or omit to state a material fact relating to Innkeepers Hospitality necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
     
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Innkeepers Hospitality as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     
4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for Innkeepers Hospitality and we have:

  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Innkeepers Hospitality, including its combined affiliates, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     
  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of Innkeepers Hospitality’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
     
  c)   presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to Innkeepers Hospitality’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Innkeepers Hospitality’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for Innkeepers Hospitality’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     
  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Innkeepers Hospitality’s internal controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 14, 2002      

   
/s/ ROGER POLLAK

      Roger Pollak
Vice President of Accounting
Innkeepers Hospitality

29