XML 29 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.1
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase Obligations
In the ordinary course of business, the Company issues purchase orders based on its current manufacturing needs. As of March 31, 2023, the Company had non-cancelable purchase commitments of $122.2 million, of which $110.0 million are expected to be paid within the year ending December 31, 2023.
Ransomware Incident
During the three months ended March 31, 2023, the Company did not incur any material expenses related to the previously disclosed ransomware incident. As of March 31, 2023, the Company has incurred $13.6 million of cumulative expenses related to the ransomware incident since it was detected, partially offset by $11.1 million of insurance recoveries, of
which $9.6 million have been received as of March 31, 2023. Expenses included costs to investigate and remediate the ransomware incident, as well as legal and other professional services, all of which were expensed as incurred.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is currently involved in various legal proceedings.
A class action lawsuit was filed against the Company, on June 5, 2019, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division, captioned Corey Heard, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Omnicell, Inc., Case No. 2019-CH-06817 (the “Heard Action”). The complaint seeks class certification, monetary damages in the form of statutory damages for willful and/or reckless or, in the alternative, negligent violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), and certain declaratory, injunctive, and other relief based on causes of action directed to allegations of violation of BIPA by the Company. The complaint was served on the Company on June 13, 2019. On July 31, 2019, the Company filed a motion to stay or consolidate the case with the action Yana Mazya, et al. v. Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital, et al., Case No. 2018-CH-07161, pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Chancery Division (the “Mazya Action”). The Court subsequently, on October 10, 2019, denied the motion, without prejudice, as being moot in view of the dismissal of the claims against the Company in the Mazya Action. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in the Heard Action on October 31, 2019. The hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss was held on September 2, 2020. The Court ruled from the bench and dismissed the complaint without prejudice giving plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by September 30, 2020. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 30, 2020 and the Company subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on October 28, 2020, which was fully briefed, but the Court had not heard oral argument on the motion. The parties entered into a settlement agreement on January 25, 2022, (the “Settlement Agreement”). On February 1, 2022, the Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. Following preliminary approval, plaintiff conducted discovery to identify class members and to determine the class size. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, and following class size discovery, the parties participated in non-binding mediation on November 21, 2022. A settlement was reached at the mediation and the parties executed an addendum to the Settlement Agreement (the “Addendum”) reflecting the changes to the original settlement terms. On November 30, 2022, the Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement contemplated by the Settlement Agreement, as amended by the Addendum. The Addendum required Omnicell to make a total settlement payment of $4.3 million. On April 6, 2023, the Court granted final approval of the settlement, including the Addendum, and entered judgment in the matter dismissing all claims against Omnicell with prejudice. The Company made its final required settlement payment installment on or before the April 21, 2023 due date.
As required under ASC 450, Contingencies, the Company accrues for contingencies when it believes that a loss is probable and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of any such loss. Outside of the matter discussed above, the Company has not recorded any material accrual for contingent liabilities associated with its current legal proceedings based on its belief that any potential material loss, while reasonably possible, is not probable. Furthermore, any possible range of loss in these matters cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. The Company believes that it has valid defenses with respect to legal proceedings pending against it. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and it is possible that cash flows or results of operations could be materially affected in any particular period by the unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or because of the diversion of management’s attention and the creation of significant expenses, regardless of outcome.
The Company is not a party to any legal proceedings that management believes may have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.