XML 31 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure”, establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to those valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
Basis of Fair Value Measurement
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted instruments.
Level 2
Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3
Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
We evaluate the position of each financial instrument measured at fair value in the hierarchy individually based on the valuation methodology we apply. The carrying amount of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The fair value of our long-term debt is included in Note 4, "Long-term Debt and Other Financing Arrangements".
Hedge Accounting Activities
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
We are party to interest rate swap agreements to mitigate our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on the outstanding principal amount of our Euro Term Loans. These interest rate swaps, designated as cash flow hedges, provide us with variable-rate cash receipts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the lives of the agreements, with no exchange of the underlying notional amount. These instruments are carried at fair value on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as other current and other non-current liabilities based on their maturity, and the effective portion of the changes in the fair value is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income / loss and subsequently reclassified to interest expense when the hedged item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of changes in the fair value is recognized immediately in the change in fair value of derivatives in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income / loss. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we did not recognize any charges related to hedge ineffectiveness.
Information relating to financial instruments is as follows:
Trade Date
 
Number of Contracts

 
Description
 
Aggregate Notional Amount

 
Maturity Date
 
Objective
 
Fair Value as at March 31, 2017

April 5, 2016
 
5

 
Interest rate swap
 
468,800

 
February 21, 2021
 
Interest rate hedge underlying 2021 Euro Term Loan
 
$
(893,887
)
April 5, 2016
 
4

 
Interest rate swap
 
250,800

 
November 1, 2018
 
Interest rate hedge underlying 2018 Euro Term Loan, forward starting on November 1, 2017
 
$
(282,719
)
November 10, 2015
 
3

 
Interest rate swap
 
235,335

 
November 1, 2019
 
Interest rate hedge underlying 2019 Euro Term Loan
 
$
(1,409,599
)
November 14, 2014
 
2

 
Interest rate swap
 
250,800

 
November 1, 2017
 
Interest rate hedge underlying 2018 Euro Term Loan
 
$
(336,167
)

We value the interest rate swap agreements using a valuation model which calculates the fair value on the basis of the net present value of the estimated future cash flows. The most significant input used in the valuation model is the expected EURIBOR-based yield curve. These instruments were allocated to Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because the critical inputs to this model, including current interest rates, relevant yield curves and the known contractual terms of the instruments, were readily observable.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

BALANCE December 31, 2016
$
(4,451
)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps
573

Reclassified to interest expense
685

BALANCE March 31, 2017
$
(3,193
)

Non-Hedge Accounting Activities
The change in fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments comprised the following for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
 
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2017

 
2016

Currency swaps
$
368


$
(14,050
)

Foreign Currency Risk
We have entered into the below forward foreign exchange contract to reduce our exposure to movements in foreign exchange rates related to contractual payments under certain dollar-denominated agreements. Information relating to financial instruments is as follows:
Trade Date
 
Number of Contracts
 
Description
 
Aggregate Notional Amount

 
Maturity Date
 
Objective
 
Fair Value as at March 31, 2017

January 31, 2017
 
1
 
EUR / USD forward
 
$
19,270

 
December 21, 2017
 
 USD-denominated operating payments
 
$
266

These forward foreign exchange contracts are considered economic hedges but were not designated as hedging instruments, so changes in the fair value of the derivatives were recorded as changes in fair value of derivatives in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income / loss and in the condensed consolidated balance sheet in other current assets. We valued these contracts using an industry-standard pricing model which calculated the fair value on the basis of the net present value of the estimated future cash flows receivable or payable. These instruments were allocated to Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because the critical inputs to this model, including foreign exchange forward rates and the known contractual terms of the instruments, were readily observable.