20-F 1 form20f.htm ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 2005 Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Reg Technologies Inc. - Form 20F

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

¨ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 - For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-24342

Reg Technologies Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia, Canada
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

1103-11871 Horseshoe Way
Richmond, British Columbia V7A 5H5, Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, no par value
(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's class of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

Title of Each Class Outstanding at April 30, 2005
Common Shares, no par value 22,620,392
Preferred Shares, $1.00 par value none
Class A, no par value none

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x  No ¨

Indicate by check mark which financial statement the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17. x Item 18. ¨


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I   4
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS 4
ITEM 2. OFFER AND STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE 4
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION 4
A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 4
B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS 6
C. REASON FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS 6
D. RISK FACTORS 6
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY 9
A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT 9
B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW 12
C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE 19
D. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 19
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS 19
A. OPERATING RESULTS     19
B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES    21
C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC 22
D. TREND INFORMATION 23
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES 24
A. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES 24
B. COMPENSATION 25
C. BOARD PRACTICES 26
D. EMPLOYEES 27
E. SHARE OWNERSHIP 27
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 28
A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS 28
B. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 28
C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL. 28
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 28
A. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION 28
B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES 29
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING 29
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 30
A. SHARE CAPITAL 30
B. MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION 30
C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS 30
D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS 31
E. TAXATION 32
F. DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS 32
G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS 32
H. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY 32
I. SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION 33
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 33
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES 33
PART II       33
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELIQUENCIES 33
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS. 33
A. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS 33
B. USE OF PROCEEDS. 33
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 34
ITEM 16. [RESERVED] 34
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT 34
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS 34

- 2 -



ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 34
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES 35
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS 35
PART III 35
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 35
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 35
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS 35

SIGNATURE      PAGE 39

- 3 -


Foreign Private Issuer Status

Foreign Private Issuer Status:

Reg Technologies, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as the "Company”, or “we”, “it”, “our” or such other context as may be applicable), is a Canadian corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia. Less than 50% of our common stock is held by United States citizens and residents, our business is administered principally outside the United States; and more than 50% of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, we believe that we qualify as a "foreign private issuer" for continuing to report regarding the registration of our common stock using this Form 20-F annual report format.

PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act, and accordingly, the information called for in Item 1 is not required. Please see “Item 6 – Directors, Senior Management and Employees –Directors and Senior Management”.

ITEM 2. OFFER AND STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act, and accordingly, the information called for in Item 2 is not required.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The summary consolidated financial information set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the Consolidated Financial Statements, as of and for the years ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, together with the notes thereto, which appear elsewhere in this annual report. The Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the years ended April 30, 2005 and 2004 have been audited by Manning Elliott. The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. See Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP.

The selected financial data set forth in the following table is expressed in Canadian dollars. Since June 1, 1970, the Government of Canada has permitted a floating exchange rate to determine the value of the Canadian dollar as compared to the United States dollar. At April 29, 2005, US$1.00 was equal to approximately C$1.2568. The exchange rates for the past five fiscal years ended April 30, are presented below.

The following represents our selected financial data for each of the past five fiscal years, ending on April 30. The data presented is prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and expressed in Canadian dollars:

- 4 -


Fiscal Years Ended April 30

  2005 2004    2003 2002 2001
Net sales or operating revenues - - - - -
Income (loss) from operations 397,692) (59,924) (63,869) 165,989 (1,631,759)
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
(397,692)
 
(59,924)
 
(63,869)
 
165,989
 
(1,631,759)
 
Net income (loss) (397,692) (59,924) (63,869) 165,989 (1,631,759)
Net income (loss) from
operations per share
(0.02)
 
-
 
-
 
(0.01)
 
(0.10)
 
Income (loss) from continuing
operations per share
(0.02)
 
-
 
-
 
(0.01)
 
(0.10)
 
Total assets 191,587 210,882 210,477 253,364 262,443
Net assets (108,185) (57,331) (583,285) (838,674) (1,085,587)
Capital stock (excluding long
term debt and redeemable
preferred stock)
11,038,596
 
 
11,011,046
 
 
10,467,921
 
 
10,467,921
 
 
10,392,920
 
 
Number of shares as adjusted to
reflect changes in capital
22,252,970
 
22,101,470
 
17,078,371
 
17,078,371
 
16,578,371
 
Dividends per share - - - - -
Diluted net income per share - - - - -

Reference is made to "Item 4. Information on the Company" and "Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a description of the initiation and progression of our activities since incorporation.

Currencies and Exchange Rates:

We publish our financial statements in Canadian dollars. Unless otherwise indicated, monetary amounts referred to in this annual report are in Canadian dollars. Unless otherwise indicated, all translations from Canadian dollars to US dollars have been made at a rate of CDN$ 1.2568 to US$ 1.00, the noon buying rate as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the "Noon Buying Rate") on April 30, 2005. We do not represent that Canadian dollar or US dollar amounts could be converted into US dollars or Canadian dollars, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates below or at all. On August 18, 2005, the Noon Buying Rate was CDN$ 1.2178 to US$ 1.00. The following table sets forth noon buying rate for US dollars in New York City for cable transfers in Canadian dollars as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for the periods indicated:

The following table reflects the monthly high and low exchange rates for U.S.$1.00 to the Canadian dollar for the following periods.

Month Year High (CAD$) Low (CAD$)
May 2005 1.2703 1.2373
June 2005 1.2578 1.2256
July 2005 1.2437 1.2048
August 2005 1.2185 1.1888

The following table lists the average exchange rate for US$1.00 to the Canadian dollar for the last five years based on the average month-end exchange rates.

- 5 -



Year Average Low/High April 30
2005 1.2702 1.1775/ 1.397 1.2568
2004 1.344 1.269/1.4221 1.3711
2003 1.5388 1.4336/1.5963 1.4663
2002 1.5671 1.5102/1.6128 1.5681
2001 1.5113 1.4639/1.5790 1.5360

B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act, and accordingly, the information called for in this Item 3.B is not required

C. REASON FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Exchange Act, and accordingly, the information called for in Item 3.C is not required.

D. RISK FACTORS

The occurrence of any of the following risks could hurt our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such case, the trading price of our shares could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. You should carefully consider the following risks and the other information in this Report and our other filings with the SEC before you decide to invest in us or to maintain or increase your investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not now known to us or that we think are immaterial may also adversely impact and impair our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, or financial condition would likely suffer. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Development Stage Enterprise. We are a development stage enterprise and is subject to all of the attendant business risks associated with a development stage enterprise, including constraints on financial and personnel resources, lack of established credit facilities, and uncertainties regarding product development and future revenues. We will continue to be subject to all the risks attendant to a development stage enterprise for the foreseeable future, including competition, complications and setbacks in the development program, and the need for additional capital.

We have reported losses in each year since its inception. At April 30, 2005, we had an accumulated deficit of ($11,285,742) in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our history consists almost entirely of development of its products funded entirely from the sale of our Common Stock in the absence of revenues. We anticipate that it will continue to incur substantial additional operating losses for at least the next 12 months and expects cumulative losses to increase as our development efforts expand.

Although we anticipate receiving future revenues from the sales of engines or the licensing of our technology or pursuant to a joint venture, we have received minimal revenues in preparation for licensing or joint venture activities, and there are no assurances that significant revenues will be derived from this activity in the future. We have received no revenues from sales of any of the products under development. There can be no assurance as to when or if we will be able to develop significant sources of revenue or whether our operations will become profitable, even if we are able to commercialize any product. See "Operating and Financial Review and Prospects," and Notes to Financial Statements.

- 6 -


Ability to develop product. We have no assurance at this time that a commercially feasible design will ever be perfected, or if it is, that it will become profitable. Our profitability and survival will depend upon our ability to develop a technically and commercially feasible product which will be accepted by end users. The RC/DC Engine which we are developing must be technologically superior or at least equal to other engines that competitors offer and must have a competitive price/performance ratio to adequately penetrate its potential markets. If we are not able to achieve this condition or if we do not remain technologically competitive, we may be unprofitable and our investors could lose their entire investment. There can be no assurance that we or potential licensees will be able to achieve and maintain end user acceptance of our engine.

Additional Financing will be Required. Our expectations as to the amount of funds needed for development and the timing of the need for these funds is based on our current operating plan, which can change as a result of many factors, and we could require additional funding sooner than anticipated. Our cash needs may vary materially from those now planned because of results of development or changes in the focus and direction of our development program, competitive and technological advances, results of laboratory and field testing, requirements of regulatory agencies and other factors.

We have no credit facility or other committed sources of capital. To the extent capital resources are insufficient to meet future capital requirements, we will have to raise additional funds to continue our development and operations. There can be no assurance that such funds will be available on favorable terms, or at all. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution to our shareholders. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to curtail operations significantly or to obtain funds on unattractive terms. Our inability to raise capital would have a material adverse effect on us.

Significant Losses for the Foreseeable Future. We expect to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future and cannot be certain when or if we will achieve profitability. Failure to become and remain profitable will adversely affect the value of our Common Shares and our ability to raise capital and continue operations.

Product/Market Acceptance. Our profitability and survival will depend upon our ability to develop a technically and commercially feasible product which will be accepted by end users. The RC/DC Engine and the AVFCS which we are developing must be technologically superior or at least equal to other engines which our competitors offer and must have a competitive price/performance ratio to adequately penetrate our potential markets. A number of rotary engines have been designed over the past 70 years but only one, the Wankel, has been able to achieve mechanical practicality and any significant market acceptance. If we are not able to achieve this condition or if we do not remain technologically competitive, we may be unprofitable and our investors could lose their entire investment. There can be no assurance that we or our potential licensees will be able to achieve and maintain end user acceptance of our engine or the AFVCS.

No Formal Market Survey. We have not conducted a formal market survey but statistics available on the aircraft, marine and industrial markets alone indicate an annual market potential of more than one hundred million dollars.

Lack Of Experience To Manufacture Or Market Product. Assuming we are successful in developing the Rand Cam products, we presently have no proven ability either to manufacture or market the engine. There is no assurance that we will be able to profitably manufacture and market engines.

Going Concern Disclosure In Independent Auditor's Report. The report of our independent auditors with respect to our financial statements included in this Form 20-F includes a "going concern" qualification, indicating that our losses and deficits in working capital and shareholders' equity raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. See " Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and Notes to Financial Statements.

Our Dependence on Skilled Personnel. We are dependent on certain members of our management and engineering staff,

- 7 -


the loss of services of one or more of whom could adversely affect our business. In particular, we depend on the abilities and continued participation of Pat Badgley and other key personnel who have been instrumental in bringing the Rand Cam engine to its present state of development. The loss of any of these key individuals could hamper the successful development of the engine. Our present officers and directors have other full-time positions or part-time employment unrelated to our business. Some officers and directors will be available to participate in management decisions on a part-time or as-needed basis only. Our management may devote time to other companies or projects which may compete directly or indirectly with us. We do not have "key man" life insurance on such officers and currently have no plans to obtain such insurance. See "Management". Our success also depends on our ability to attract and retain additional skilled employees.

Dependence on Consultants and Outside Manufacturing Facilities. Since our present plans do not provide for a significant technical staff or the establishment of manufacturing facilities, we will be primarily dependent on others to perform these functions and to provide the requisite expertise and quality control. There is no assurance that such persons or institutions will be available when needed at affordable prices. It will likely cost more to have independent companies do research and manufacturing than for us to handle these resources.

Protection of Intellectual Property. Our business depends on the protection of our intellectual property and may suffer if we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property. The success of our business depends on our ability to patent our engine. Currently, we have been granted several U.S. Patents. We cannot provide assurance that our patents will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged, that the rights granted under the patents will give us competitive advantages or that our patent applications will be granted.

Product Errors. Engines such as the ones proposed by us and our related planned applications may contain errors or defects, especially when first introduced, or when new versions are released. Our products may not be free from errors after commercial release has occurred. Any errors that are discovered after such commercial release could result in loss of revenue or delay in market acceptance, diversion of development resources, damage to our reputation, increased service and warranty costs and liability claims. Any defects in these products could adversely affect the operation of and market for our products, reduce revenue, increase costs and damage our reputation.

Competition. While not a highly competitive business in terms of numbers of competitors, the business of developing engines of a new design and attempting to either license or produce them is nonetheless difficult because most existing engine producers are large, well financed companies which are very concerned about maintaining their market position. These companies possess greater technical resources and market recognition than us, and have management, financial and other resources not yet available to us. Existing engines are likely to be perceived by many customers as superior or more reliable than any new product until it has been in the marketplace for a period of time. There is no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively with these companies.

Market prices for our products may decline in the future. We anticipate that market prices for our main products may decline in the future due to increased competition. We expect significant competition among local and international companies, including from new entrants, may continue to drive equipment prices lower. We also expect that there may be increases in promotional spending by companies in our industry which would also contribute to increasing movement of customers between competitors. Such increased competition and the resulting decline of market prices for our products would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Rapid technological change. New technology or refinement of existing technology could render our Rand Cam products less attractive or obsolete. Our success depends in part upon its ability to anticipate changes in technology and industry standards and to successfully develop and introduce new and improved engines on a timely basis. There is no assurance that we will be able to do so.

- 8 -


Timing of new product introductions and lack of market acceptance for our new products. Our future success may be dependent on the success of our products and services. The success of our business depends on a variety of factors, including:

  • the quality and reliability of our products and services;
  • our ability to develop new products and services superior to that of our competitors;
  • our ability to establish licensing relationships and other strategic alliances;
  • our pricing policies and the pricing policies of our competitors;
  • our ability to introduce new products and services before our competitors;
  • our ability to successfully advertise our products and services; and
  • general economic trends.

Volatility of The Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTC BB”) or the TSX Venture Exchange may adversely affect the price of the Common Stock. Certain stocks listed on the OTC BB and/or the TSX Venture Exchange have recently experienced significant price and volume fluctuations and decreases which have adversely affected the market price of our and other stocks listed on the OTC BB and/or the TSX Venture Exchange without any regard to the underlying fundamentals of such stocks. These broad market fluctuations, which may occur in the future, as well as issues more specifically related to our business activities or prospects, our financial performance, intellectual property, may continue to adversely affect the market price of the Common Stock.

Product liability. Product liability claims asserted against us in the future could hurt our business. If a customer suffers damage from our products, the customer could sue us on product liability or related grounds, claim damages for data loss or make other claims. We currently do not carry product liability insurance. While we have not been sued on product liability grounds to date, a successful product liability or related claim brought against us could harm our business.

We do not expect to pay cash dividends. We intend to retain any future earnings to finance our business and operations and any future growth. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Potential lack of attractive investment targets. Continued volatility of stock prices on the OTC BB and the TSX Venture Exchange may have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise capital on the OTC BB or the TSX Venture Exchange or by private investment, and the price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially.

Other Factors. Our areas of business may be affected from time to time by such matters as changes in general economic conditions, changes in laws and regulations, taxes, tax laws, prices and costs, and other factors of a general nature which may have an adverse effect on our business.

Conflict of Interest. Some of our current officers and directors have other unrelated full-time positions or part-time employment. Some officers and directors will be available to participate in management decisions on a part-time or as-needed basis only. Our management may devote its time to other companies or projects which may compete directly or indirectly with us.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT

- 9 -


We were originally incorporated on October 6, 1982 as Reg Resources Corp. under a perpetual charter pursuant to the British Columbia Company Act by registration of our Memorandum and Articles. On February 23, 1993 we changed our name to Reg Technologies Inc. in order to better reflect our main area of business development. We did not consolidate our shares at the time our name was changed.

Our authorized capital consists of 65,000,000 shares consisting of 50,000,000 common shares without par value, 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $1.00 per share and 5,000,000 class "A" non-voting shares without par value. Of the 50,000,000 common shares without par value, 22,620,392shares were issued and outstanding as of April 30, 2005 and 22,705,735are outstanding as at September 9, 2005. There are no Preferred or Class "A" Shares currently outstanding. All the Issuer's outstanding shares are Common Shares. They are not subject to any future call or assessment and they all have equal voting rights. There are no special rights or restrictions of any nature attached to any of the shares and they all rank equally, as to all benefits that might accrue to the holder thereof.

Our head office is located at #1103 -11871 Horseshoe Way, Richmond, B.C., V7A 5H5, Canada. Our telephone number is 604-278-5996 and our fax number is 604-278-3409.

We made our initial public offering of 500,000 Common Shares in July 1983 at a price of $0.50 per share to residents of British Columbia. Following the completion of that offering, our shares were listed on the Vancouver Stock Exchange (which is now the TSX Venture Exchange, previously the Canadian Venture Exchange).

We were initially involved in the mineral development and oil and gas business. The mineral development business produced no revenues from operations and the oil and gas business produced only limited revenues.

On May 23, 1986 we entered an agreement which was amended October 20, 1986 ("Initial Agreements") among ourself, Rand Cam-Engine Corp (a private company owned by James L. McCann, the inventor of the Rand Cam Engine) and James L. McCann. Under this agreement we acquired a 40% interest in a company to be formed, by paying $50,000 and agreeing to expend $200,000 on research and development pertaining to the Rand Cam Engine, which utilizes a new type of design for a rotary internal combustion engine.

The company to be formed referred to above was incorporated in November 1989, by registration of its Memorandum and Articles pursuant to the British Columbia Company Act as Rand Energy Group Inc. (REGI), which company would hold all the rights, agreements and patents to the Rand Cam Engine. We acquired 1,200,000 of the issued and outstanding shares of REGI while Rand Cam-Engine Corp. acquired 1,800,000 of the issued and outstanding shares.

The Initial Agreements were superseded by an "Energy Group Acquisition Agreement" dated March 28, 1990 and a "Share Purchase Agreement" dated March 28, 1990 whereby James L. McCann and Rand Cam- Engine Corp. agreed to transfer all rights, title and interest in and to the Rand Cam Engine to REGI for 1,800,000 common shares of REGI in consideration for certain covenants and warranties along with the $250,000 expended in accordance with the Initial Agreements. We were allotted 1,200,000 common shares of REGI.

These agreements resulted in us owning 40% of the issued and outstanding shares of Rand Technologies Inc., with the balance of 60% being owned by Rand Cam-Engine Corp. Pursuant to an amalgamation agreement between the shareholders of Rand Technologies Inc. and REGI, the two companies were amalgamated effective July 31, 1993. The amalgamated company is called Rand Energy Group Inc. and retains the same ownership structure.

Under an agreement dated April 27, 1993, between ourself, REGI, Rand Cam-Engine Corporation and James L. McCann (the "Agreement"), Rand Cam-Engine Corporation agreed to sell to us 330,000 shares of REGI, representing a further 11% interest in REGI. In consideration for a controlling interest in REGI, we agreed to pay Rand Cam-Engine Corporation $50,000, issue 600,000 shares of our Common Stock (the "Purchase

- 10 -


Price") and grant a participating royalty to a maximum amount of $10,000,000, ("Participating Royalty"). The Participating Royalty is to be paid in minimum annual installments of $50,000 per year beginning on the date the first revenues are derived from the license or sale of the patented technology and after shares are issued per above. As part of the minimum payment, the Company is to pay 5% of all net profits from sales, licenses, royalties or income derived from the patented technology.

Under the terms of the Agreement, if any of the 600,000 shares to be issued above remain unissued after ten years from the date of the Agreement, these shares will not be issued and we shall be relieved of any further obligations in respect to the issuance of these shares. Accordingly, the requirement to issue these shares has expired.

Pursuant to an agreement with Brian Cherry ("Cherry Agreement") dated July 30, 1992 , REGI was assigned all rights, title and interest in the Direct Charge Rotary Engine for all countries excluding the United States of America. Also under the Cherry Agreement, we were assigned from Brian Cherry all right, title and interest in and to the Rand Cam/Direct Charge Rotary Engine for the United States. Pursuant to a letter of understanding between the Company, REGI US and REGI (collectively called the grantors) and West Virginia University Research Corporation (WVURC), the grantors have agreed that WVURC shall own 5% of all patented technology and will receive 5% of all net profits from sales, licenses, royalties or income derived from the patented technology. A 1% net profit royalty will be payable to Brian Cherry on all U.S. based sales.

REGI U.S., INC.

REGI U.S., Inc. ("REGI U.S.") is 15.0% owned U.S. subsidiary of Rand Energy Group Inc. which is in turn controlled through 51% ownership by us. REGI U.S. was organized under the laws of the State of Oregon on July 27, 1992 as Sky Technologies, Inc. with its name changed on August 1, 1994. It has a total authorized capital of 50,000,000 common shares. As of April 30, 2005, a total of 23,764,475 were issued of which 3,700,976 are owned by Rand Energy Group Inc. In 1993 Sky completed an offering of 500,000 units consisting of one share of the Common Stock with no par value and one Warrant to purchase one share of Sky. Each Warrant entitled the holder to purchase one share of Sky at $1.25 until August 24, 1994 and then at a price of $1.50 during the following 12 month period, or extension thereof.

The Company is in the business of developing and commercially exploiting an improved axial vane type rotary engine known as the Rand Cam™/Direct Charge Engine and other RandCam™ applications, such as compressors and pumps (the “Technology”). The world-wide marketing and intellectual rights, other than the U.S., are held by Rand Energy Group Inc. (a Canadian subsidiary 51% owned by the Company) which controls REGI US, Inc. (a U.S. public company). REGI US, Inc. owns the U.S. marketing and intellectual rights. Rand Energy Group Inc. and REGI US, Inc. have a project cost sharing agreement whereby these companies each fund 50% of the development of the Technology. As at April 30, 2005 Rand Energy Group Inc. owes Reg Technologies $2,803,664 which will be fully repaid prior to royalty obligations due as discussed in Note 9(a) and prior to dividends being paid to the owners of Rand Energy Group Inc.

Pursuant to an agreement dated July 30, 1992 and amendments thereto between Brian Cherry, Sky and ourself (the "Cherry Agreement"), we acquired and then assigned to Sky the U.S. technology rights to the Rand Cam/Direct Charge Rotary Engine (the "Rand Cam/Direct Charge Rotary Engine") from Brian Cherry. REGI will retain a 5% interest in the net profits from the United States rights. In consideration, Mr. Cherry received, subject to regulatory approval, 100,000 shares of the Company, and a 1% net profits interest in REGI U.S. Brian Cherry purchased 300,000 shares of Sky/REGI at US $0.01.

REGI is controlled through irrevocable voting trusts with other affiliated companies giving the Company the ability to control 60% of the voting shares of REGI US, Inc.

Our stock currently trades on the OTC BB under the symbol REGRF and on the TSX Venture Exchange as RRE.

- 11 -


B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Nature of the Company’s Operations

We are engaged in the business of developing and building an improved axial vane-type rotary engine known as the Rand CamTM Direct Charge (“RC/DC”) Engine, which is a variation of the Original Engine. The Original Engine is an axial vane rotary engine, the worldwide marketing rights to which are held by RAND. A United States patent was issued for the RC/DC Engine on July 4, 1995, and assigned to us. Since no marketable product has yet been developed, we have not received any revenues from operations.

The RC/DC Engine is based upon the Original Engine patented in 1983. Brian Cherry, a former officer and director of the Company, has done additional development work on the Original Engine that resulted in significant changes and improvements for which the U.S. patent has been issued and assigned to us. We believe the RC/DC Engine offers important simplification from the basic Original Engine, which will make it easier to manufacture and will also allow it to operate more efficiently.

Based upon testing work performed by independent organizations on prototype models, we believe that the RC/DC Engine holds significant potential in a number of other applications ranging from small stationary equipment to automobiles and aircraft. In additional to its potential use as an internal combustion engine, the RC/DC Engine design is being employed in the development of several types of compressors, pumps, expanders and other applications.

To date, several prototypes of the RC/DC Engine have been tested and additional development and testing work is continuing. We believe that such development and testing will continue until a commercially feasible design is perfected. There is no assurance at this time, however, that such a commercially feasible design will ever be perfected, or if it is, that it will become profitable. If a commercially feasible design is perfected, we do, however, expect to derive revenues from licensing the Technology relating to the RC/DC Engine regardless of whether actual commercial production is ever achieved. There is no assurance at this time, however, that revenues will ever be received from licensing the Technology even if it does prove to be commercially feasible.

We believe that a large market would exist for a practical rotary engine which could be produced at a competitive price and which could provide a good combination of fuel efficiency, power density and exhaust emissions.

Based on the market potential, we believe the RC\DC Engine is well suited for application to internal combustion engines, pumps, compressors and expansion engines. The mechanism can be scaled to match virtually any size requirement. This flexibility opens the door to large markets being developed.

We have built prototypes for these products including air pumps for fuel cell applications and air conditioning compressors. Our strategy is to develop engines and compressors for low to medium horsepower applications, then apply the Technology to larger applications. We plan to license the Technology or enter into joint venture arrangements for other specific applications. The licensee or joint venture partners will then provide funding for research and development of the specific applications. To date, we have, through our subsidiary REGI US, completed three license agreements with Advanced Ceramics for 10 H.P. or less for remote piloted vehicles, a license agreement with Radian MILPARTS for greater than 10 H.P. for military applications and to Rotary Power International for Generator applications. The agreement with Advanced Ceramics has terminated due to Phase II funding not being completed. A previous agreement with Trans Air to test an air conditioning Rand Cam™ compressor is still pending. Rotary Power agreement has been terminated due to non payment of $100,000.

- 12 -


PRODUCTS AND PROJECTS

Rand Cam Technology
Rand Cam Cold Turbine Engine

On May 7, 2003 we announced that Rotary Power International has been granted a license agreement for the power generator applications. On June 9, 2003 we announced that the license had been extended to December 31, 2003. The agreement has now lapsed due to non payment of the $100,000.

Gasoline and Diesel Engine

Two prototype engines were built in 1993 and 1994 by the WVURC to run on gasoline. Testing on these prototypes suggested that the concept is fundamentally sound and that with a program of engine review, design, testing and development, a technically successful range of engines can be developed. The current prototype design for the diesel engine was designed by a consortium made up of Alliant Techsystems (formerly Hercules Aerospace Company) ("Alliant"), WVURC and us. Alliant was involved in the design and development including drawings for the RC/DC diesel engine. In addition Alliant performed extensive analysis on the diesel engine including bearings, cooling, leakage, rotor, vanes, housing, vane tip heating, geometry and combustion. This engine was designed as a general purpose power plant for military and commercial applications. A prototype of the diesel engine has been assembled and tested.

In May 2004 the Company completed an amended Rand Cam™ UAV engine license agreement with Radian, Inc. Radian, Inc. agrees to furnish REGI U.S., Inc. with a second generation, application specific Rand Cam™ 42 H.P. diesel engine at the conclusion of their Phase II study program. The Radian, Inc. UAV product development program commenced early in 2004. The Phase I/ Study Rand Cam™ 42 H.P. diesel engine demonstrated that the engine generates sufficient pressure and temperature to proceed with the second generation diesel engine.

On November 3, 2004 we announced that the Canadian Patent was issued for the Rand Cam™ Rotary Engine effective October 5, 2004. The term of the patent is twenty years from the date of the filing on December 11, 1992.

On November 29, 2004, we announced that a world wide license agreement, excluding the rights for the United States of America that are held by REGI U.S. for the Rand Cam™ technology has been successfully completed with Rand Energy Group Inc. Reg Technologies, Inc., our parent company, has agreed to pay a 5% net profit interest and make annual payments of $50,000. Reg Technologies, Inc. will be responsible for 50% of the costs for development and production of the Rand Cam™ technology.

The world wide patents cover Canada and several countries in Europe, namely, Germany, France, Great Britain, and Italy. Reg Technologies, Inc., together with REGI U.S., Inc., is in the process of testing a Rand Cam™ diesel engine for a generator application for hybrid electric cars. Additionally, our licensee for the 42 H.P. production model diesel Rand Cam™ is currently completing the engine for unmanned aerial applications for the U.S. military.

Compressor

We contracted Coltec, Inc., a Columbus, Indiana engineering firm, to fabricate the Rand Cam (TM) air conditioning compressor for buses. The testing is to be conducted by Trans/Air Manufacturing Corporation, one of the largest manufacturers of air conditioning units for buses, which has agreed to jointly develop and manufacture the working model compressor. The prototype compressor was delivered to Trans/Air in January 2001.

A special 3.2 SCFM air compressor has been designed and built for a large fuel cell customer. The customer

- 13 -


has reviewed the design and his comments including type of drive motor, inlet and outlet piping arrangements and mounting considerations were incorporated and final drawings were prepared.

In January, 2004, testing for the air conditioning compressor for buses application had commenced by Trans Air Manufacturing. The new manifold has been installed on the working prototype compressor and pressure testing has commenced. Trans Air Manufacturing will first perform bench testing to baseline speed, performance, and power consumption data before designing to install on a vehicle for “real world” testing.

Based on the successful completion of the Joint Venture, being the development and successful testing of a working prototype of the Bus Compressor, Trans Air shall have the exclusive right and shall use its reasonable efforts to market, merchandise, sell and exploit the Bus Compressor within the markets or geographical areas in which Trans Air, in its sole option and discretion, believes such efforts would be appropriate. Currently Brian Cherry, our Vice President of Research and Development, is overseeing the testing of the air conditioning compressor.

In August 2004, we completed compressor tests which displayed encouraging results of up to 25 P.S.I. with only 800 R.P.M. The testing for the compressor was completed on behalf of Trans Air Manufacturing for air-conditioning in bus applications, and exceeded our expectations. We are currently negotiating a license agreement for compressor applications, to be announced when the terms and conditions are finalized.

Hydrogen Separator

We purchased the rights to the H2O Hydrogen Separator Technology consisting of a hydrogen separator based, which is a unique system for extracting hydrogen from water.

In consideration for a 50% interest for the rights to the Hydrogen Separator Technology Reg Technologies, Inc. (“Reg”) agrees that we shall apply for a patent in the U.S. for the Hydrogen Separator Technology at Reg’s expense; and Reg agrees to build a prototype of the Hydrogen Separator Technology as designed by GHM, Inc. We declined the option to purchase an additional 50% interest. To date, neither patent confirmation nor approval has been received by Reg.

Ceramic Rand CamTM Engine

In July 2003, the RadMax TM Engine was announced at the AUVSI Conference Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems. (AUV) by our licensee Radian MILPARTS. The announcement stated that plans are in place to start calibration testing at the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) Patuxent River, MD late in the summer. Procedures are written and in place to determine and document the RadMax ™ Engines horsepower, its vibration and noise metrics, and so forth. Following completion of the testing, to be conducted by engineers, first production units will generally be available by the fall, followed by a full production run next year.

The announcement further stated that the RadMax ™ Engine, a heavy fuel engine that is comprised of only 13 moving parts, is completely balanced and on all speeds, loads and orientation angles. Without piston valves, a crankshaft or camshaft it is inherently quiet at 60 dB at 1,500 feet.

We have entered into an agreement with Radian which grants an exclusive license for the manufacture of the Rand Cam Diesel Engines within the United States, for applications in Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles (UAV'S) over 10 horsepower, including non-exclusive rights to the worldwide sales for this application.

In February, 2004 we announced that a REGI U.S. licencee for unmanned vehicle system engines had completed testing of the prototype 42 H.P. engine. Tests occurred at Adiabatics in Columbus, IN and at the U.S. Navy's test facility at Patuxent River, MD. The initial test results demonstrated that the first generation prototype engine generated pressure and temperature. The licencee has started design of a second generation prototype. The documentation and one of the completed 42 H.P. Rand Cam(tm) engines have been delivered to REGI U.S., Inc. as part of the license agreement.

- 14 -


Rand Cam™ Generator and Fuel Cell Technology

In September 2004 testing had commenced for the Rand Cam™ generator application for hybrid electric cars, portable generator application, and for back up power for family homes. Brian Cherry, our Vice President of the Rand Cam™ engine projects and co-inventor of the Rand Cam™ technology, is overseeing the development and testing in conjunction with two rotary engine mechanics with over 10 years experience with the Mazda rotary engine.

In April, 2005 we completed several successful, continuous combustion tests for the Rand Cam™ engine using gasoline fuel. The series of tests took place at SNK’s facilities, in Richmond, BC, on April 14, 2005, with starter speed of up to 490 RPM, utilizing a unique vane design that does not require vane tip seals. Eliminating the need for vane tip seals will reduce the manufacturing and maintenance costs significantly, therefore, resulting in a breakthrough with the technology. The Rand Cam™ engine design will be further tested for generator and hybrid car applications.

On June 29, 2005, REGI U.S., Inc. entered into an exclusive distributor agreement relating to fuel cell technology (the “Technology”) with Anuvu Incorporated (“Anuvu”). Reg Technologies, Inc., agrees to pay $200,000.00 as payment in full for the exclusive Canadian Distributorship for the Technology. REGI U.S. has an option to pay $300,000 for the exclusive European rights for the Technology, of which $150,000.00 is to be paid within 90 days from the date of the Agreement and the final payment of $150,000.00 is to be paid on or before November 30, 2005 REGI U.S. agrees to issue 200,000 treasury shares of REGI U.S., Inc. to Anuvu upon confirmation of acceptance of the European fuel cell technology patents. Anuvu will submit a patent application for Canada and Europe based on the current fuel cell technology claims set forth in claims of the U.S. Patents Pending held by Anuvu before the deadline date by the Patent Office. Patents will be owned by Anuvu and used exclusively in Europe by REGI during the term of the Agreement. REGI agrees to pay for the patent application costs and associated legal fees for Europe.

Reg Technologies, Inc. and REGI agree to pay a 5% royalty of the adjusted gross sales relating to the Technology.

REGI and Reg Technologies, Inc. will receive up to 1,000,000 warrants of Anuvu, based on 2 warrants issued for every $1.00 paid for the Distribution rights. The warrants enable REGI and Reg Technologies, Inc. the right to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Anuvu for a total of $10,000 for a period of one year.

Anuvu agrees as follows:

  • to give REGI a right of first refusal to purchase Anuvu shares, in the event additional shares are to be issued or purchased, for a period of six months;
  • to build a working fuel cell model prototype for a vehicle for demonstration purposes in Canada and Europe on behalf of Reg Technologies, Inc. and REGI
  • to work on the Rand Cam™ projects as required by Reg Technologies, Inc. and REGI, under a contract basis;
  • to grant to REGI and Reg Technologies a right of first refusal to exclusively use, manufacture, develop, sell, market and distribute products based on new patents and applications for patents, improvements, technology, products, devices, know-how, inventions, ideas, methods, processes and concepts, which are owned or developed by Anuvu and are not included in the Distributorship Patents in consideration for 100,000 treasury shares of REGI.

- 15 -


We believe the companies have a common objective of developing a clean burning new source of power for vehicles, which are currently using gasoline driven piston engines. We are in the final phase of developing a light weight rotary engine that will run on any fuel, including cleaner burning fuels, such as hydrogen, propane and natural gas.

Anuvu Fuel Cell Advantages:

  • Anuvu recently commenced building 1,100 fuel cell engines for an automotive customer.
  • The Anuvu fuel cell is Integration-Ready, complete fuel cell systems have been integrated into on-road vehicles, boats, off-road vehicles and extensively used in driving simulators.
  • Anuvu fuel cells exceed goals for DOE weight and volume for mobile applications
  • Improved stack efficiency and life by liquid cooling each cell for uniform temperature control.
  • Improved water management technology which allows operation over a broad range of gas and humidity conditions, greatly reducing the complexity and cost of gas humidification subsystems
  • Smaller, lighter, more robust and vibration tolerant
  • Carbon-based to reduce catalyst poisoning, increasing cell life
  • Lower cost with no precious metals, except a trace amount of platinum
  • Designed for high volume manufacturing and consistency of performance

Description of the Markets in Which the Company Competes

We currently face and will continue to face competition in the future from established companies engaged in the business of developing, manufacturing and marketing engines and other products. While not a highly competitive business in terms of numbers of competitors, the business of developing engines of a new design and attempting to either license or produce them is nonetheless difficult because most existing engine producers are large, well financed companies which are very concerned about maintaining their market position. Such competitors are already well established in the market and have substantially greater resources than us. Internal combustion engines are produced by automobile manufacturers, marine engine manufacturers, heavy equipment manufacturers and specialty aircraft and industrial engine manufacturers. We expect that our engine would be used mainly in industrial and marine applications.

Except for the Wankel rotary engine built by Mazda of Japan, no competitor, that we are aware of, presently produces in a commercial quantity any rotary engine similar to the engines we are developing. The Wankel rotary engine is similar only in that it is a rotary engine rather than a reciprocating piston engine. Without substantially greater financial resources than is currently available to us, however, it is very possible that it may not be able to adequately compete in the engine business. One competitor, Rotary Power International, is presently producing the first production SCORE rotary (Wankel type) engines. Our RC\DC Engine is more fuel efficient, smaller, quieter, costs less to produce and will have fewer exhaust emissions.

We believe that if and when our engine is completely developed, in order to be successful in meeting or overcoming competition which currently exists or may develop in the future, our engine will need to offer superior performance and/or cost advantages over existing engines used in various applications.

Seasonality

We believe that there is no seasonality which affects the sales of our products.

Availability of Raw Materials

Since we are not in production and there are no plans at this time for us to enter the actual engine manufacturing business, raw materials are not of present concern. At this time, however, there does not appear to be any foreseeable problem with obtaining any materials or components, which may be required in the manufacture of its potential products.

- 16 -


Marketing Strategy

We intend to pursue the development of the RC/DC Engine and the air pump, compressor and other products by entering into licensing and/or joint venture arrangements with other larger companies, which have the financial resources to maximize the potential of the technology. We have signed license agreements with Radian, Inc. and Trans Air Manufacturing. We have no current plans to become actively involved in either manufacturing or marketing any engine or other product which it may ultimately develop to the point of becoming a commercial product.

Our current objective is to complete and test the various compressor, pump and diesel engine prototypes. Based on the successful testing, the prototypes will be used for presentation purposes to potential license and joint venture partners.

We expect revenue from license agreements with the potential end users based on the success of the design from the compressor, pump, and diesel engine prototypes. Based on of successful testing of the Rand Cam prototypes, we expect to have joint venture or license agreements finalized, which would result in royalties to us. However, there is no assurance that the tests will be successful or that we will ever receive any such royalties.

The following marketing activities are all currently underway:

AIR CONDITIONING COMPRESSOR - An agreement with Trans Air Manufacturers has been completed to use the Rand Cam(TM) compressor in air conditioning units in bus applications. We have delivered a compressor prototype for testing. We are awaiting test results from Trans Air. Currently, Brian Cherry, our Vice President of Research and Development, is overseeing the testing of the air conditioning compressor.

AIR PUMP – A prototype air pump for a Fuel Cell Application has been completed and will be delivered to the Fuel Cell manufacturer and others. We plan to build several additional air pumps for demonstration purposes for other fuel cell uses.

DIESEL ENGINE – We have signed a license agreement with Radian MILPARTS to further develop our Rand Cam Technology for a 42 horsepower engine. Our license agreement with Radian calls for a 6% royalty to us and one working model 42 horsepower diesel engine for our own use for demonstration purposes for the other commercial applications. The second generation prototype is currently being completed by Radian.

Dependence on Certain Commercial Agreements

We do not have any material agreements upon which we are dependent. Patents and Licenses Patents

We have patents on the Rand Cam Engine for Canada, Mexico and the United States to protect certain aspects of the Rand Cam engine. U.S. patent 5,429,084 was granted on July 4, 1995, to James McCann, Brian Cherry, Patrick Badgley and four other individuals for various improvements incorporated in the RC/DC Engine, This patent has been assigned to us. The patent to the original Rand Cam engine, U.S. Patent 4,401,070, was issued on August 30, 1983 to James McCann and the marketing rights are held by Rand Energy.

The RC/DC Engine is composed basically of a disk shaped rotor with drive shaft, which turns, and the housing or stator, which remains stationary. The rotor has two or more vanes that are mounted perpendicular to the

- 17 -


direction of rotation and slide back and forth through it. As the rotor turns, the ends of the vanes ride along the insides of the stator housing which have wave-like depressions, causing the vanes to slide back and forth. In the process of turning and sliding, combustion chambers are formed between the rotor, stator walls and vanes where the fuel/air mixture is injected, compressed, burned and exhausted.

Two additional patents have been issued for improvements to the engine including: U.S. Patents 5,509,793 “Rotary Device with Slidable Vane Supports) issued April 24, 1996 and 5,551,853 “Axial Vane Rotary Device and Sealing System Therefor) issued September 3, 1996.

Royalty Payments

The August 1992 Agreement calls for us to pay RAND semi-annually a royalty of 5% of any net profits to be derived by us from revenues received as a result of its license of the Original Engine. The August 1992 Agreement also calls for us to pay Brian Cherry a royalty of 1% semi-annually any net profits derived by us from revenue received as a result of our licensing the Original Engine.

Other provisions of the April 1993 Agreement call for is (a) to pay to RAND a continuing royalty of 5% of the net profits derived from the Technology by us and (b) to pay to Brian Cherry a continuing royalty of 1% of the net profits derived by us from the Technology.

Pursuant to the letter of understanding dated December 13, 1993, among us, RAND, Reg Tech and WVURC, WVURC will receive 5% of all net profits from sales, licenses, royalties or income derived from the patented technology relating to the Original Engine and the RC/DC Engine.

No royalties are to be paid to Alliant or Adiabatics, Inc.

Competition and Alternative Technologies

We believe strong competition can be expected in the engine market with new patents being taken out on a continuous basis and that we may have a time advantage over some of the competitive products as far as niche markets which we may enter, however there is no way to accurately determine or predict whether this situation is or will continue to be true.

The conventional piston type internal combustion engine is the prime competitor of the Rand Cam Engine. Due to the substantial infrastructure built up to support the standard combustion engine, substantial barriers to entry exist into this market.

A number of the new engine designs over the last decade have offered advantages on the thermodynamics front (e.g. more efficient use of energy through better combustion, better heat transfer, etc.). In the case of the Rand Cam Engine, its strong point it believed to be in its mechanism, not in its thermodynamics. Whether or not the engine's mechanism alone will provide the competitive edge necessary to result in a marketable and successful product is unknown at this time.

Since we do not have management experience in manufacturing engines, it hopes to be able to follow the same strategy as that of other companies such as Orbital and Wankel, where it would be licensing its technology and would therefore not be directly engaged in manufacturing.

An extensive manufacturing study has not been performed to date and it could turn out that the costs to manufacture are prohibitive for one or more reasons. However, the computer modeling done can be utilized to generate manufacturing drawings which could be used to obtain preliminary costing estimates.

The development of our business and its ability to maintain its competitive and technical position has depended and will depend, in part, upon its ability to attract and retain qualified scientific, engineering, managerial and manufacturing personnel.

- 18 -


Significant competition exists from engine manufacturers and engineering firms specializing in the development of internal combustion engines technology for the automotive, marine, motorcycle and small engine industry. Such competition also exists in the pump and compressor markets which may utilize the Rand Cam technology in their products. Many of these companies have substantially greater resources for research, development and manufacturing than us. It is possible that our competitors may succeed in developing technologies and products that are more effective or commercially acceptable. We believe, based on its testing of the Rand Cam engine that the engine is a superior overall engine package to the reciprocating piston engine. This assessment is made on the basis of the Rand Cam engine's potential for reduced engine weight and packaging volume, improved performance, and possibly lower manufacturing costs.

Technology development is taking place on many fronts and competitors may have, unknown to us, a product or products under development which may be technologically superior to ours which may be more acceptable to the market. Competition with engines employing Rand Cam technology may also include other lean burn engines, electric motors, gas turbine engines, solar power and hybrid vehicles, and may include concepts not yet known to us.

Material effects of Government

Our engine products including the spark ignited engine, Diesel engine and Cold Turbine engine will be subject to various exhaust emissions standards depending upon the application and the country in which it is produced and/or sold. As each product becomes ready for sale, it will be necessary to have the engine certified according to the standards in effort at that time.

C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

For a list of our significant subsidiaries, see “Item 10 – Additional Information – Subsidiary Information”.

D. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

We own no properties. We currently utilizes office space which we lease in a commercial business park building located in Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, a suburb of Vancouver. The monthly rent for our portion of this office space is $500.00. The present facilities are believed to be adequate for meeting our needs for the immediate future. However we expect that we will likely acquire separate space when the level of business activity requires us to do so. We do not anticipate that we will have any difficulty in obtaining such additional space at favorable rates. There are no current plans to purchase or lease any properties in the near future.

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. The following discussion is derived from the U.S. GAAP reconciliation.

A. OPERATING RESULTS

We are a development stage company engaged in the business of developing and commercially exploiting an improved axial vane type rotary engine known as the Rand Cam/Direct Charge Engine (the "RC/DC Engine").

As a development stage company, we devote most of our activities to establishing our business. Planned principal activities have not yet produced significant revenues and we have a working capital deficit. We have

- 19 -


undergone mounting losses to date totaling $11,285,742 and further losses are expected until we complete a licensing agreement with a manufacturer and reseller. Our working capital deficit is $108,186. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to emerge from the development stage with respect to our planned principal business activity is dependent upon our successful efforts to raise additional equity financing, receive funding from affiliates and controlling shareholders, and develop a market for our products.

Continuing Operations

Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2005 compared to Fiscal year Ended April 30, 2004

Results of Operations

Results of operations was a net loss of $398,000 ($0.01 per share) for 2005 as compared to net loss of $60,000 ($0.01 per share) for 2004.

No revenues from the sale or licensing of any technology were realized in 2005 or 2004.

In 2005, the Company recognized a gain of $383,000 as a result of its subsidiary issuing shares outside the consolidated group for cash proceeds of $426,000 which resulted in a gained disposition of 9.4% of its ownership in this subsidiary. General and administrative expenses decreased by $25,000 to $862,000 in 2005 from $897,000 in 2004. This decrease is a result of decreases in investor relations/consulting and management and directors’ fees of $137,000 which was primarily offset by increases in office, rent, professional fees, stock based compensation, transfer agent fees, travel and wages of $107,000 to $321,00 in 2005 from $207,000 in 2004. In 2005, the Company wrote off prototype research and development costs of $8,545,324 and patent costs of $221,830 in accordance with current generally accepted accounting principles, due to the uncertainty about future cash flows from the technology.

In 2004, the Company recognized a gain of $473,000 as a result of its subsidiary issuing shares outside the consolidated group for cash proceeds of $ 670,000, which resulted in a deemed disposition of 10.5% of its ownership in the subsidiary. Administrative expenses increased by $411,000 to $908,000 in 2004 from $497,000 in 2003. This increase is a result of increases in investor relations/consulting and management and directors’ fees; professional fees increased by $51,400 to $93,400 in 2004 from $42,000 in 2003; travel and promotion increased by $24,200 to $24,500 in 2004 from $300 in 2003.

The Company issued 335,211 common shares for $73,478 cash during the year.

Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2004 compared to Fiscal year Ended April 30, 2003

Results of Operations

Results of operations resulted in a net loss of $60,000 ($0.00 per share) for 2004 as compared to net loss of $64,000 ($0.00 per share) for 2003.

No revenues from the sale or licensing of any technology were realized in 2004 or 2003. License agreements with Advanced Ceramics Research, Inc. and Rotary Power Generation Incorporated were entered into in 2002.

In 2004, the Company recognized a gain of $473,000 as a result of its subsidiary issuing shares outside the consolidated group for cash proceeds of $670,000 which resulted in a gained disposition of 10.5% of its ownership in this subsidiary.

General and administrative expenses increased by $400,000 to $897,000 in 2004 from $497,000 in 2003. This increase is a result of increases in investor relations/consulting and management and directors’ fees; professional fees increased by $51,400 to $93,400 in 2004 from $42,000 in 2003; travel and promotion increased by $24,200 to $24,500 in 2004 from $300 in 2003.

- 20 -


The Company issued 1,250,000 common shares for $175,000 cash during the year and issued 3,956,810 common shares to settle related party debt of $395,682.

Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2003 compared to Fiscal year Ended April 30, 2002

Results of Operations

Results of operations resulted in a net loss of $60,000 ($0.01 per share) for 2003 as compared to net income of $166,000 ($0.01 per share) for 2002.

No revenues from the sale or licensing of any technology were realized in 2003 or 2002. We entered into license agreements with Advanced Ceramics Research, Inc. and Rotary Power Generation Incorporated in 2002.

In 2003, the Company recognized a loss of $216,000 as a result of its subsidiary issuing shares outside the consolidated group for cash proceeds of $476,000 which resulted in a deemed disposition of 16% of its ownership in the subsidiary. In 2002 there was a gain of $217,000 on proceeds of $423,000. In 2002 a loss of $30,000 was recognized due to the write-down of the AVFS rights and development costs as compared to nil in 2003. Administrative expenses increased by $91,000 to $441,000 in 2003 from $350,000 in 2002. This increase is a result of services donated to REGI U.S., Inc by directors of the subsidiary; professional fees decreased by $13,000 to $42,000 in 2003 from $55,000 in 2002; travel and promotion decreased by $6,000 to $1,000 in 2003 from $7,000 in 2002.

Research and development expenses increased by $77,000 to $47,000 spent in 2003 compared to a $30,000 recover in 2002. Technical consulting continued to consist of Patrick Badgley and Paul LaMarche, resulting in a decrease of $26,000 to $71,000 in 2003 from $97,000 in 2002. Prototype development costs of $54,000 were recovered in 2003 compared to $97,000 spent in 2002. Accounts payable of $259,000 were written off during 2002. The majority of prototype developments are now being borne by the licensees and manufacturers.

The Company did not issue any common shares during the year.

B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

In the past, the Company has derived most of its development and operating capital primarily from the issuance of our capital stock and our subsidiary REGI U.S., Inc. We have also caused our subsidiary, Rand Energy Group Inc. to sell shares it owned in REGI U.S., Inc. Reg Technologies, Inc. directly owns 3,320,000 shares of REGI U.S., Inc. with a value of $1.99 million (US) and Rand Energy Group Inc. owns 3,582,136 shares of REGI U.S. with a value of $2.14 million (US). REGI U.S., Inc. is currently completing a private placement at US$0.60 for a maximum of 2,000,000 units to raise up to US$1,200,000.

We have been successful in the past in acquiring capital through the issuance of shares of our Common Stock, and through advances from related parties. Although we intend to continue utilizing these sources, there has been no assurance in the past that these sources and methods would continue to be available in the future.

In the event that no other sources of capital were available to us in the future, on a reasonable financial basis, we would face the same obstacles as many small, undercapitalized companies do, and, in the worst case, we could be forced to reorganize or liquidate, either of which consequence would likely have an adverse financial effect upon our shareholders.

- 21 -


Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2005 compared to Fiscal year Ended April 30, 2004

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, we derived development and operating capital from the $86,442 amounts received from related companies ($328,500 in 2004).

During the 2005 year, no funds were raised from subscriptions. Operating capital was derived from the sale of 335,211 common shares for $73,478, as well as the issuance of our subsidiary’s shares totaling $422,269. Funds raised do not provide enough working capital to fund ongoing operations for the next twelve months. We may also raise additional funds through stock options, if exercised. Options with respect to 1,187,500 shares at between $0.10 and $0.30 per share may be exercised to net $127,725, if exercised.

In the 2005 fiscal year, the Company wrote off prototype research and development costs of $8,545,324 and patent costs of $221,830 in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, due to the uncertainty about future cash flows from the technology. Continuing research and development costs will be expensed during each fiscal period.

Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2004 compared to Fiscal year Ended April 30, 2003

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004, we derived most of our development and operating capital primarily from the $328,000 in proceeds received from related companies ($141,000 in 2003).

During the 2004 year, we raised no monies from subscriptions. Operating capital was derived from the sale of 175,000 shares, as well as the issuance of our subsidiary’s shares totaling $142,000. Funds raised do not provide enough working capital to fund ongoing operations for the next twelve months. We may also raise additional funds through the exercise of stock options, if exercised. Options with respect to 1,325,000 shares at $0.10 per share may be exercised to net $132,500, if exercised.

Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2003 compared to Fiscal year Ended April 30, 2002

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, we derived most of our development and operating capital primarily from the $141,000 in proceeds received from related companies ($365,000 in 2002).

During the year, we raised a further $42,000 in subscriptions received pursuant to private placements in both the Company and its subsidiary, REGI U.S., Inc. These funds raised do not provide enough working capital to fund ongoing operations for the next twelve months. We may also raise additional funds through the exercise of stock options, if exercised. Options with respect to 1,325,000 shares at $0.10 per share may be exercised to net $132,500, if exercised.

C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.

The basic research and development work on the RC/DC Engine and other products is being coordinated and funded by Reg Tech and funded as to 50%.

We plan to contract with outside individuals, institutions and companies to perform most of the additional research and development work which we may require to benefit from our rights to the RC/DC Engine and other products.

During the last two fiscal years, excluding foreign exchange adjustment, we spent $264,500 on research and development. During the last year, the majority of the costs were paid directly toward the building of the 42 horsepower prototypes by Radian Milparts and by Advanced Ceramics for the 10 horsepower ceramic engine for unmanned aerial applied uses.

- 22 -


D. TREND INFORMATION

See “Item 4. - Information on the Company, - Part B., Business Overview”

E. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

There are no known significant off-balance sheet arrangements other than those disclosed in this Form 20-F and in our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2004.

F. TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table summarizes all of the outstanding obligations of the Company’s continuing operations by the year that they become due. We expect to fund these obligations from operating income and equity financing:

 
       Contractual Obligations
 
Year
Expenditure
Commitment
 
Number of Shares
       
(1) 2004 $ - -
(1) 2005 $ - -
(1) 2006 $ - -
          (1) refer to note 9(a) to the financial statements

G. Safe Harbor

This annual report includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may include conclusions of prefeasibility and feasibility studies, estimates of future production, capital and operating costs, prices of silver and gold and other known and unknown risks. These and other factors and uncertainties may cause material differences from future results as expressed or implied by these forward looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include but are not limited to the risks involved in the exploration, development and mining business.

All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this annual report that address activities, events or developments which we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words "believe", "intend", "expect", "anticipate", "project", "estimate", "predict" and similar expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Our estimated or anticipated future results or other non-historical facts are forward-looking and reflect our current perspective of existing trends and information. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified, and consequently actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the success of our exploration and development activities, environmental and other regulatory requirements, foreign exchange issues, mineral deposit estimates and mineral prices, competition by other mining companies, financing risks, mineral title issues, insider conflicts of interest, political stability issues, and other risks and uncertainties detailed in this report and from time to time in our other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.

- 23 -


Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this annual report are qualified by these cautionary statements. We cannot assure you that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected effect on us or our business or operations.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties in addition to the risks referred to in “Risk Factors” under Item 3.D above.

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

As of April 30, 2005, our Board of Directors consisted of four Directors, two of whom are independent (or “outside”) non-executive Directors. The following table provides certain information about the members of our Board of Directors as of April 30, 2005.

Name Position with Registrant Term of Office Office Held Since
John G. Robertson
 
President, Secretary and
Director
Annual Shareholders
Meeting for fiscal 2005
1982
 
Jennifer Lorette
 
Director
 
Annual Shareholders
Meeting for fiscal 2005
2001
 
James Vandeberg
 
Chief Financial Officer
and Director
Annual Shareholders
meeting for fiscal 2005
2003
 
Susanne Robertson
 
Director
 
Annual Shareholders
meeting for fiscal 2005
1984
 

Susanne Robertson, a director, is the wife of John Robertson, our President and a director.

The present and principal occupations of our directors and executive officers during the last five years are set forth below:

John G. Robertson, Richmond, B.C. Since October 1984, Mr. Robertson has been President and a Director of our Company. He is also the Chairman of the Board, founder and a director of Linux G old Corp. since its inception. Mr. Robertson has been the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of REGI U.S., Inc., an Oregon corporation traded on the OTC bulletin board, since July 1992, a U.S. public company engaged in the development of a rotary engine/compressor (“Rand Cam Engine”) and hydrogen separator technology. REGI U.S. is ultimately controlled by Reg Technologies Inc. Mr. Robertson has been the President and Principal Executive Officer and a Director of IAS Communications, Inc. since its formation in December 1994, a U.S. public company which is developing and marketing proprietary antenna technology. Since June 1997 Mr. Robertson has been President, Principal Executive Officer and a Director of Information Highway.com, Inc., a Florida corporation which is inactive. Mr. Robertson is also the President and founder of Teryl Resources Corp., a British Columbia company trading on the TSX Venture Exchange involved in mineral exploration. Since May 1977 Mr. Robertson has been President and a member of the Board of Directors of SMR Investments Ltd., a private British Columbia corporation engaged in management of public companies. Mr. Robertson is also the President and Director of the following private companies: JGR Petroleum, Inc., BlueCrow Internet Co. Ltd., 394754 B.C. Ltd., dba SOVO Computer Centre, Pavlik Travel Services Ltd., World Tel-Internet (Toronto) Ltd., International Diamond Syndicate Ltd., Argon Investment Corporation, and Airstream Communications, Inc. Mr. Robertson is a citizen and resident of Canada.

Jennifer Lorette, Richmond, B.C. - Since April 1994, Ms. Lorette has been Vice President of Administration for Reg Technologies, Inc., and became a director in 2000. Ms. Lorette is a director of Linux Gold Corp., a

- 24 -


British Columbia company traded on the OTC BB, and has held several positions with it since June 1994, most recently as its Vice President and Secretary. Also since June 1994 Ms. Lorette, has been Vice President of REGI U.S., Inc., an Oregon corporation traded on the OTC bulletin board. REGI U.S. is ultimately controlled by Reg Technologies Inc. Since June 1997 Ms. Lorette has been Secretary/Treasurer, and a Director of Information Highway.com, Inc., a Florida corporation traded which is inactive. Ms. Lorette is a founder, and has been Secretary/Treasurer of IAS Communications, Inc. since February 1995. Since November 1997 Ms. Lorette has been Vice President of Teryl Resources Corp., a public company trading on the TSX Venture Exchange involved in gold, diamond, and oil and gas exploration. She also became a director in February 2001. Ms. Lorette is a citizen and resident of Canada.

Susanne M. Robertson, Richmond, B.C. Mrs. Robertson has been a director of the Company since 1984 and is also the wife of John Robertson, its president. She has been active in the management of the Company since its incorporation. She is also a director of Linux Gold Corp. and Teryl Resources Corp., and is the principal shareholder of SMR Investments Ltd. Mrs. Robertson is a citizen and resident of Canada.

James L. Vandeberg, Sammamish, WA Mr. Vandeberg has been a director of the Company since March 2004. Mr. Vandeberg is an attorney in Seattle, Washington. Mr. Vandeberg's practice focuses on the corporate finance area, with an emphasis on securities and acquisitions. Mr. Vandeberg was previously general counsel and secretary of two NYSE companies and is a director of Information-Highway.com, Inc., a Florida corporation which is currently inactive. He is also a director of IAS Communications, Inc. an Oregon corporation traded on the OTC bulletin board since November 1998. He is also a director of REGI U.S., Inc. an Oregon corporation traded on the OTC bulletin board. Mr. Vandeberg is also a director of Linux Gold Corp., a British Columbia company traded on the OTC bulletin board. Mr. Vandeberg is also a director of Cyber Merchants Exchange, Inc. since May 2001. He is a member and former director of the American Society of Corporate Secretaries. He became a member of the Washington Bar Association in 1969 and of the California Bar Association in 1973. Mr. Vandeberg graduated cum laude from the University of Washington with a Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting in 1966, and from New York University School of Law in 1969, where he was a Root-Tilden Scholar.

B. COMPENSATION

During the year ended April 30, 2005, the aggregate cash compensation (including salaries, fees, directors' fees, commissions, bonuses paid for services rendered, and any compensation other than bonuses earned during the fiscal year, the payment of which was deferred) paid to such executive officers as a group by us and our subsidiaries for services rendered was $119,696. Related company advances were $164,267. Total compensation paid to all employees was $138,478.

Under a three-year Management Agreement entered into on May 1, 1996 between us and SMR Investments Ltd. (“SMR”), and approved by the TSX Venture Exchange, SMR, a company owned by Susanne M. Robertson, a director of the Company and wife of John G. Robertson, receives $2,500 per month for management services provided to us. This contract is renewable annually after the initial term ended May 1, 1999.

$12,000 was paid to John G. Robertson, President of the Company, as a director's fee during the past fiscal year.

During fiscal 2005, $30,000 US was paid to Access Information Systems, Inc., which is owned and controlled by the Robertson Family Trust, the beneficiary of which is Kelly Robertson, daughter of John G. Robertson. Mr. Robertson is one of three trustees of the Robertson Family Trust, which acts by the majority vote of the three trustees, for project management services.

- 25 -


Except as noted elsewhere herein, we did not pay any additional compensation to our executive officers (including personal benefits and securities or properties paid or distributed), which compensation was not offered on the same terms to all full time employees.

No monies were set aside or accrued by us during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for our officers or directors.

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, we did not grant any long-term incentive plans awards to any of our executive officers, directors or employees.

Additional detailed information regarding compensation shall be included in the Information Circular for our 2005 annual general meeting, which was held on October 24, 2005.

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 no new stock options were granted, 62,500 stock options were exercised and no stock options expired pursuant to stock option plans.

Total options currently exercisable at the date of this 20-F are 1,187,500. Of the total amount:

  • 750,000 are exercisable at $0.10 per share expiring October 11, 2005;
  • 162,500 are exercisable at $0.30 per share expiring September 18, 2008;
  • 250,000 are exercisable at $0.19 per share expiring March 4, 2009; and
  • 25,000 are exercisable at $0.14 per share expiring April 8, 2009.

Options to Purchase Registrant's Common Shares Held by Officers and Directors of Registrant

NAME OF OPTIONEE NUMBER OF OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE EXPIRY DATE
John G. Robertson 750,000 $0.10 October 11, 2005
Jennifer Lorette 50,000 $0.30 September 18, 2008
  25,000 $0.14 April 8, 2009
Susanne Robertson 250,000 $0.19 March 4, 2009
James Vandeberg 50,000 $0.30 September 18, 2008
TOTAL HELD AS A GROUP: 1,125,000    

Options to Purchase Registrant’s Common Shares Held by Persons Other than Officers and Directors of the Registrant

NAME OF OPTIONEE NUMBER OF OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE  EXPIRY DATE
Arnie Winrob 37,500 $0.30 September 18, 2008
Monique Van Oord 25,000 $0.30 September 18, 2008
TOTAL: 62,500    

C. BOARD PRACTICES

Under section 224 of the Business Corporations Act, S.B.C. 2002, c. 57, the directors of a company must, at their first meeting on or after each annual reference date, elect an audit committee, to hold office until the next annual reference date. The audit committee must be composed of at least 3 directors, and a majority of the members of the committee must not be officers or employees of the company or of an affiliate of the company. The members must elect a chair from among their number and determine their own procedures. The auditor of a company must be given reasonable notice of, and has the right to appear before and to be heard at each

- 26 -


meeting of the company’s audit committee and must appear before the audit committee when request to do so by the committee and after being given reasonable notice to do so. Our Board of Directors established an Audit Committee which members consisting of James Vandeberg, Susanne Robertson and Jennifer Lorette.

The Directors are elected by the shareholders to hold office for a term of one year or until re-elected at the next annual general meeting.

D. EMPLOYEES

Competition for technical personnel in our industry is intense. We believe that we have been successful in recruiting qualified employees, and that our future success depends in part on our continued ability to hire, assimilate and retain qualified personnel.

Our employees do not belong to any labor unions. We have not been subject to any strikes or other labor disturbances that have interfered with our operations.

As of April 30, 2005, five part-time employees/contractors were employed. Many of our legal, accounting, marketing and administrative functions are contracted out to consultants.

E. SHARE OWNERSHIP

The following table sets forth the ownership of our common shares by our Directors and Officers as at September 16, 2005:

Shareholder
 
Number of shares issued and
outstanding
Percentage ownership (1)
 
John G. Robertson (2) 2,500,199       11.0%
Jennifer Lorette (3) 83,400       *
Susanne Robertson (4) 4,888,728       21.5%
James Vandeberg (5) 50,000       *

  (1)

As at September 9, 2005, there were 22,705,735 issued and outstanding common shares.

     
  (2)

Includes 1,118,530 shares registered in the name of and beneficially owned by Access Information Services, Inc., a Washington corporation which is owned and controlled by the Robertson Family Trust, the beneficiary of which is Kelly Robertson, daughter of John G. Robertson. Mr. Robertson is one of three trustees of the Robertson Family Trust, which acts by the majority vote of the three trustees. Mr. Robertson disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned or controlled by the Robertson Family Trust. It also includes 750,000 stock options which are currently exercisable and in-the-money.

     
  (3)

Includes 75,000 stock options which are currently in-the-money.

     
  (4)

SMR Investments Ltd., a company wholly-owned by Susanne Robertson, is the beneficial owner of 3,356,807 common shares representing 15.1% of our outstanding common shares. This amount also includes 250,000 stock options which are currently exercisable and in-the-money, and 641,956 share purchase warrants.

     
  (5)

Includes 50,000 stock options which are currently exercisable but not in the money.

* Beneficially owns less than one percent of our common shares.

For information regarding the ownership of stock options to acquire our common shares which are held by our Directors and Officers, and also by our employees, please refer to “ – Stock Options Granted to Employees, Directors and Senior Managers”.

- 27 -


ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS.

To the best of our knowledge, we are not indirectly owned or controlled by any other corporation or foreign government.

As of September 16, 2005, 22,705,735 Common Shares were outstanding. At such date, and to the knowledge of our directors and senior officers, no person beneficially owned shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all our shares, other than those persons set out above.

We do not know of any arrangements which could result in a change in our control.

B. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.

Under a three-year Management Agreement entered into on May 1, 1996 between us and SMR Investments Ltd., and approved by the TSX Venture Exchange, SMR, a private company owned by Susanne M. Robertson, one of our directors and wife of John G. Robertson, receives $2,500 per month for management services provided to us. This contract has been renewable annually after the initial term ended May 1, 1999. Accordingly, SMR incurred management fees of $30,000 in each of fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003.

A director's fee of $12,000 was paid to John G. Robertson, our President, during each of fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003.

We had related party advances outstanding of $164,267 at the April 2005 year-end, compared to $122,148 at the end of our previous fiscal year. These were unsecured, non-interest bearing and with no fixed terms of repayment.

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 there was no material direct or indirect interest by our directors and officers, any shareholder who beneficially owns more than 10% of our common shares, or any known associate or affiliate of these persons in any transactions or proposed transaction which has or would materially affect us.

At no time during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 has any director, senior officer, proposed nominee for election, nor any associate of such persons been indebted to us or our subsidiaries, other than routine indebtedness.

C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL.

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

See page F-1 to F-13 following Item 19.

Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any material legal proceedings.

Dividend Distribution Policy

We have not paid any cash dividends to date and we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

- 28 -


B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

None.

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING

Not applicable, except for Item 9.A.4 and Item 9.C.

Our shares have traded on the Vancouver Stock Exchange (the "VSE") its successor, the Canadian Venture Exchange, and its successor the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX”) (the principal non-United States trading market) since August, 1983. In addition, there has been a U.S. market in our shares on the NQB "Pink Sheets" for the past several years and more recently, on the OTC Bulletin Board. We are not specifically aware of prices and other trading details for any shares which have or may have traded on the "Pink Sheets". The ranges of the low and high sales prices for our shares traded on the TSX and OTC BB for the periods indicated are as follows:

    TSX Venture OTC BB*
           
    High Low High Low
    Cdn. $ Cdn. $ U.S. $ U.S. $
        High-Bid* Low-Bid*
 2003          
 
 
1st Quarter ended
July 31/02
0.13
 
0.04
 
0.085
 
0.07
 
 
 
2nd Quarter ended
October 31/02
0.13
 
0.07
 
0.09
 
0.05
 
 
 
3rd Quarter ended
January 31/03
0.12
 
0.06
 
0.075
 
0.05
 
 
 
4th Quarter ended
April 30/03
0.08
 
0.05
 
0.065
 
0.04
 
 2004          
 
 
1st Quarter ended
July 31/03
0.17
 
0.04
 
0.165
 
0.03
 
 
 
2nd Quarter ended
October 31/03
0.40
 
0.15
 
0.27
 
0.07
 
 
 
3rd Quarter ended
January 31/04
0.27
 
0.17
 
0.18
 
0.12
 
 
 
4th Quarter ended
April 30/04
0.22
 
0.14
 
0.14
 
0.11
 
 2005          
 
 
1st Quarter ended
July 31/04
0.265
 
0.13
 
0.14
 
0.06
 
 
 
2nd Quarter ended
October 31/04
0.295
 
0.185
 
0.19
 
0.12
 
 
 
3rd Quarter ended
January 31/05
1.01
 
0.185
 
1.06
 
0.15
 
 
 
4th Quarter ended
April 30/05
0.80
 
0.34
 
0.60
 
0.26
 

- 29 -


________
*Prices for the OTC BB are in US$

(Information provided by The Over The Counter Bulletin Board. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown, or commission and may not represent actual transactions.)

The following table shows the high and low closing prices of our stock traded on the TSX and the OTC Bulletin Board during the most recent six months, for each month as follows:


 
TSX Venture OTC BB*
  High Low High Low
  Cdn. $ Cdn. $ U.S. $ U.S. $
      High-Bid* Low-Bid*
Month        
March 0.68 0.41 0.525 0.33
April 0.435 0.34 0.335 0.26
May 0.43 0.355 0.33 0.26
June 0.405 0.355 0.32 0.265
July 0.50 0.37 0.401 0.28
August 0.49 0.375 0.361 0.30

* prices on the OTC BB are in U.S. dollars.

(Information provided by The Over The Counter Bulletin Board. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown, or commission and may not represent actual transactions.)

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. SHARE CAPITAL

Not applicable.

B. MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Our Memorandum and Articles are incorporated by reference to the information in our registration statement on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in Washington, D.C. on June 15, 1994, to which our Articles of Incorporation and Memorandum were filed as exhibits.

C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS

On June 29, 2005, our subsidiary, REGI U.S., Inc. entered into an exclusive distributor agreement relating to fuel cell technology (the “Technology”) with Anuvu Incorporated (“Anuvu”). Reg Technologies, Inc., agrees to pay $200,000.00 as payment in full for the exclusive Canadian Distributorship for the Technology. REGI U.S. has an option to pay $300,000 for the exclusive European rights for the Technology, of which $150,000.00 is to be paid within 90 days from the date of the Agreement and the final payment of $150,000.00 is to be paid on or before November 30, 2005 REGI U.S. agrees to issue 200,000 of its treasury shares to Anuvu upon confirmation of acceptance of the European fuel cell technology patents. Anuvu will submit a patent application for Canada and Europe based on the current fuel cell technology claims set forth in claims of the U.S. Patents Pending held by Anuvu before the deadline date by the Patent Office. Patents will be owned by Anuvu and used exclusively in Europe by REGI U.S. during the term of the Agreement. REGI U.S. agrees to pay for the patent application costs and associated legal fees for Europe.

- 30 -


Reg Technologies, Inc. and REGI agree to pay a 5% royalty of the adjusted gross sales relating to the Technology.

REGI and Reg Technologies, Inc. will receive up to 1,000,000 warrants of Anuvu, based on 2 warrants issued for every $1.00 paid for the Distribution rights. The warrants enable REGI and Reg Technologies, Inc. the right to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Anuvu for a total of $10,000 for a period of one year.

Anuvu agrees as follows:

  • to give REGI a right of first refusal to purchase Anuvu shares, in the event additional shares are to be issued or purchased, for a period of six months;
  • to build a working fuel cell model prototype for a vehicle for demonstration purposes in Canada and Europe on behalf of Reg Technologies, Inc. and REGI
  • to work on the Rand Cam™ projects as required by Reg Technologies, Inc. and REGI, under a contract basis;
  • to grant to REGI and Reg Technologies a right of first refusal to exclusively use, manufacture, develop, sell, market and distribute products based on new patents and applications for patents, improvements, technology, products, devices, know-how, inventions, ideas, methods, processes and concepts, which are owned or developed by Anuvu and are not included in the Distributorship Patents in consideration for 100,000 treasury shares of REGI.

We believe the companies have a common objective of developing a clean burning new source of power for vehicles, which are currently using gasoline driven piston engines. We are in the final phase of developing a light weight rotary engine that will run on any fuel, including cleaner burning fuels, such as hydrogen, propane and natural gas.

Anuvu Fuel Cell Advantages:

  • Anuvu recently commenced building 1,100 fuel cell engines for an automotive customer.
  • The Anuvu fuel cell is Integration-Ready, complete fuel cell systems have been integrated into on-road vehicles, boats, off-road vehicles and extensively used in driving simulators.
  • Anuvu fuel cells exceed goals for DOE weight and volume for mobile applications
  • Improved stack efficiency and life by liquid cooling each cell for uniform temperature control.
  • Improved water management technology which allows operation over a broad range of gas and humidity conditions, greatly reducing the complexity and cost of gas humidification subsystems
  • Smaller, lighter, more robust and vibration tolerant
  • Carbon-based to reduce catalyst poisoning, increasing cell life
  • Lower cost with no precious metals, except a trace amount of platinum
  • Designed for high volume manufacturing and consistency of performance

D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS.

There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Canada relating to restrictions on the export of capital affecting the remittance of interest, dividends or other payments to nonresident holders of the Registrant's shares. Any such remittances, however, are subject to withholding tax. See Item 7, "Taxation".

There are no limitations under the laws of Canada, the Province of British Columbia or in the charter or any other constituent documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote our shares. However, under the provisions of the Investment Canada Act, when control of a Canadian business is acquired by a non-

- 31 -


Canadian, the transaction may be reviewable in certain circumstances by Investment Canada, an agency of the federal government of Canada. Reviewable transactions are those in which a non-Canadian acquires the assets of a Canadian business or the voting shares of a Canadian corporation the value of which assets or shares exceeds $5 million (Canadian). Also, certain transactions are specifically exempted from review.

E TAXATION.

Withholding

Generally, cash dividends paid by Canadian corporations to nonresident shareholders are subject to a withholding tax of 25 percent. However, pursuant to Article X[2] of the Canada-United States tax treaty, dividends paid to a resident if a company of the United States are only subject to a 15 percent withholding tax. Further, if the United States resident owns 10 percent or more of the voting shares of the Canadian company paying the dividends, the withholding tax is reduced to 10 percent. In addition to dividend withholding, interest paid to United States residents is subject to a 15 percent withholding tax pursuant to Article XI[2] of the Canada-United States tax treaty.

Capital Gains

A nonresident purchaser who holds our shares as capital property will not be subject to tax on capital gains realized on the disposition of such shares unless such shares are "taxable Canadian property" within the meaning of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and no relief is afforded under any applicable tax treaty. Our shares would be taxable Canadian property of a nonresident purchaser if the nonresident purchaser used the shares in carrying on a business in Canada or if at any time during the five-year period immediately preceding the disposition not less than 25 percent of the issued shares of any class of the Company belonged to the particular purchaser, persons with whom the purchaser did not deal at arm's length or any combination thereof.

Holders of our Common Shares should seek independent advice from their own professional tax advisors with respect to the Canadian Income Tax consequences arising from the holding of our Common Shares.

F. DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS

Not applicable.

G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS.

Not applicable.

H. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY.

We filed a registration statement on Form 20-F filed the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. (Registration No. 000-30084) on June 15, 1994, which became effective August 15, 1994. The Registration Statement contains exhibits and schedules. Any statement in this annual report about any of our contracts or other documents is not necessarily complete. If the contract or document is filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, the contract or document is deemed to modify the description contained in this annual report. You must review the exhibits themselves for a complete description of the contract or documents.

You may inspect and copy our registration statements, including their exhibits and schedules, and the reports and other information we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with the Exchange Act at the public reference facilities maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, Room 1024, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the regional offices of the Securities and Exchange Commission located at Citicorp Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois

- 32 -


60661. You may also inspect the registration statements, including their exhibits and schedules, at the office of the New York Stock Exchange, Wall Street, New York, New York 10005. Copies of such material may also be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. You may obtain information regarding the Washington D.C. Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 or by contacting the Securities and Exchange Commission over the Internet at its website at http://www.sec.gov.

I. SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION.

REGI U.S., Inc. ("REGI U.S.") is a 15.0% owned U.S. subsidiary of Rand Energy Group Inc. which is in turn controlled through 51% ownership by us. REGI trades its shares on the OTC BB under the symbol RGUS. Refer to Exhibit 3 outlining our subsidiary structure.

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). The requirements of SFAS No. 150 apply to issuers’ classification and measurement of freestanding financial instruments, including those that comprise more than one option or forward contract. SFAS No. 150 does not apply to features that are embedded in a financial instrument that is not a derivative in its entirety. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities. It is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of SFAS No. 150 and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Restatement is not permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’ s results of operations or financial position.

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELIQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

A. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

B. USE OF PROCEEDS.

Not applicable

- 33 -


ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Based upon the evaluation of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant was made known to others within the company particularly during the period in which this annual report and accounts were being prepared, and such controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits under regulatory rules and securities laws is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified. Management of the Registrant recognizes that any controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance, and not absolute assurance, of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.

There were no changes in the Registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16. [RESERVED]

ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

At the time of filing this report, we have determined that John Robertson serves as the audit committee financial expert.

ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS

We have not adopted a formal written code of ethics given our relatively small size, whereby we had no employees in 2005.

Directors are subject to the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, whereby they are required to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company.

ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table discloses accounting fees and services of the Registrant:

     (Stated in terms of Canadian dollars)
 
                                                           Type of Services Rendered
 
2005
Fiscal Year
(CAD$)
2004
Fiscal Year
(CAD$)
     
(a) Audit Fees 19,720 18,650
     
(b) Audit-Related Fees - -
     
(c) Tax Fees 2,000 2,000
     
(d)  All Other Fees - -

- 34 -


ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

No disclosure required.

ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

No disclosure required.

PART III

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 17.

Reference is made to Item 19 for a list of all financial statements filed as part of this annual report.

Our consolidated financial statements are stated in Canadian Dollars (CDN$) and are prepared in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. The consolidated financial statements as required under Item 17 are included immediately following the text of this Report.

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 17.

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

(a) The following consolidated financial statements, together with the report of Manning, Elliott, on the annual financial statements referred to below, are filed as part of this annual report, and are included immediately following the text of this 20-F:

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Independent Auditors’ Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Loss and Deficit
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(b) Documents filed as exhibits to this annual report:

Number Description  
     
1.1 Articles of Incorporation with Bylaws dated October 6, 1982 (1)
1.2 Certificate of Name Change and Special Resolution dated February 23, 1993 (1)
1.3 Memorandum and articles of incorporation amended effective April 5, 2005 (9)

- 35 -



2.1 Special rights and restrictions attaching to the Common Shares without par value and the Class A non-voting shares without par value. Special resolution dated November 25, 1985 (1)
4. (a) 1 Contract among the Company, Rand Technologies Corp. and Rand Energy Group Inc. regarding formation of Rand Energy Group Inc. and arrangement of various inter- related matters, dated March 28, 1990 (1)
4. (a) 2    Energy Group Acquisition Agreement among the Company, Rand Cam-Engine Corporation, James L. McCann and Rand Energy Group Inc. regarding acquisition of technology, and rights to the Rand Cam-Engine, dated March 28, 1990 (1)
4. (a) 3 Contract among the Company, Rand Cam-Engine Corporation Rand Energy Group Inc. and James L. McCann regarding arrangement of various inter- related matters concerning issuance of shares, payments, royalties, etc., dated July 30, 1992 (1)
4. (a) 4 Agreement with Center for Industrial Research Applications (CIRA) regarding Year 2: Engine Refinement and Testing on the Rand-Cam Engine (1)
4. (a) 5 Research & Development Agreement Between Members of the Consortium of Reg Technologies Inc., Rand Energy Group Inc., Hercules Incorporated and The West Virginia University Research Corporation, dated May 10, 1994   (1)
4. (a) 6 Agreement dated October 31, 1995 between the Company and REGI U.S., Inc. regarding assignment of Machine Vision Technology agreement with Integral Vision Systems, Inc.   (2)
4. (a) 7 Cooperative Agreement between the Company and Global Aircraft Corporation regarding NASA General Aviation Propulsion Program   (3)
4. (a) 8 Agreement dated June 22, 1997 between John Weston and the Company regarding the acquisition of rights to Air/Vapour Flow Systems by the Company from Weston   (4)
4. (a) 9 Agreement dated September 23, 1997 between the Company, REGI U.S., Inc. and SMR Investments Ltd. regarding the assignment of the above agreement by the Company to REGI and SMR pending regulatory approval of the original agreement   (4)
4. (a) 10 Agreement dated December 31, 1997 between the Company REGI U.S., Inc. and SMR Investments Ltd. regarding the Canadian rights to the AVFS and repayment of advances to Weston by SMR   (4)
4. (a) 11  Joint Venture Agreement dated July 28, 1998 between REGI U.S., Inc and Trans Air Manufacturing Corporation regarding development and manufacturing of a prototype Bus Compressor   (4)
4. (a) 12 Agreement dated August 5, 1998 between the Company and T.W. Blasingame Company, Inc. (Blasingame) regarding the licensing of certain Rand Cam/Direct Charge Engine manufacturing rights to Blasingame and licensing of certain rights to the "Vane Restraint Mechanism" by Blasingame to the Company (5)
4. (a) 13 Cooperative and Licensing Agreement dated December 14, 1998 between the Company, REGI U.S., Inc. Rand Energy Group, Inc. USA and Global Aircraft Corporation regarding the NASA SBIR Phase I Contract for development of the Rand-Cam Diesel Aircraft Engine (5)

- 36 -



4. (a) 14  Agreement made as of October 27, 2000 with GHM Inc. regarding 50% interest in the rights to the hydrogen separator technology (7)
4. (a) 15 Agreement between Radian, Inc., Reg Technologies Inc., REGI U.S., Inc. and  Rand Energy Group Inc. made as of April 24, 2002 (8)
4. (a) 16  Agreement between REGI and Advanced Ceramics Research dated March 20, 2002 (8)
4. (a) 17 Agreement between REGI U.S, Inc. and Reg Technologies Inc. and Anuvu Incorporation dated June 29, 2005 (9)
4. (b) 1 Management Agreement between the Company and SMR Investments Ltd., dated April 2, 1993 (1)
4. (b) 2   Agreement between Brian Cherry, Sky Technologies, Inc. and Rand Energy Group Inc., regarding U.S. rights to the Rand Cam/Direct Charge Engine dated August 20, 1993 (1)
4. (b) 3   Employment Agreement between Sky Technologies, Inc. and Patrick Badgley dated February 9, 1994 (1)
4. (b) 4   Management Agreement between Sky Technologies, Inc. and Access Information Services, Inc., dated April 1, 1994 (1)
4. (b) 5     Agreement between the Company and Rand Energy Group Inc. granting the Company rights to negotiate and sell licenses and marketing rights for the Rand Cam Engine, dated February 27, 1992 (1)
4. (b) 6   Management Agreement dated May 1, 1996 between the Company and SMR Investments Ltd. (3)
8.1 List of Parent and Subsidiaries of the Company (9)
12.1 Certification pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (John G. Robertson) (9)
12.2 Certification pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (James Vandeberg) (9)
13.1 Certification pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (John G. Robertson) (9)
13.2 Certification pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (James Vandeberg) (9)

(1)

incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 20-F filed on June 15, 1994 with the US Securities and Exchange Commission

(2)

incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1996

(3)

incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1997

- 37 -



(4)

incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1998

(5)

incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1999

(6)

incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2000

(7)

incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001

(8)

incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002

(9)

Exhibits filed herewith.

- 38 -


SIGNATURE PAGE

The Registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this transitional report on its behalf.

REG TECHNOLOGIES INC.
REGISTRANT

Dated: October 31, 2005 By: /s/ John G. Robertson
    John G. Robertson
    President/Secretary/Director

- 39 -


 

Reg Technologies Inc.

Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended

April 30, 2005 and 2004

 


Auditors’ Report

To the Shareholders of
Reg Technologies Inc.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Reg Technologies Inc. as at April 30, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated statements of loss and deficit and cash flows for the years ended April 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards used in Canada. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects the financial position of the Company as at April 30, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and the changes in its cash flows for the years ended April 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles used in Canada.

/s/ “Manning Elliott”

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Vancouver, B.C.

August 19, 2005

Comments by Auditors for
U.S. Readers on Canada - U.S. Reporting Conflict

We also conducted our audit in accordance with the Standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by significant uncertainties and contingencies such as those referred to in Note 1 to these financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated August 19, 2005 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not permit a reference to such uncertainties in the auditors’ report when the uncertainties are adequately disclosed in the financial statements.

/s/ “Manning Elliott”

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Vancouver, B.C.

August 19, 2005


Reg Technologies Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As at April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

  2005   2004  
     
         
Assets        
         
Current Assets        
         
     Cash 166,734   6,589  
     Amounts receivable 3,188   6,469  
     Prepaid expenses 21,664    
         
  191,586   13,058  
         
Intangible Assets [Note 3] 1   697,858  
         
Deferred Development Costs   8,314,164  
         
  191,587   9,025,080  
         
Liabilities        
         
Current Liabilities        
         
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 135,505   146,066  
     Due to related parties [Note 8] 164,267   122,148  
  299,772   268,214  
         
Non-controlling Interest [Note 6]   3,140,445  
         
  299,772   3,408,659  
       
Commitments [Note 9]        
Subsequent Events [Note 10]        
         
Shareholders’ Equity (Deficiency)        
         
Share Capital [Note 4] 11,038,596   11,011,046  
         
Contributed Surplus 236,977   45,310  
         
Donated Capital [Note 8[c]] 757,740   545,410  
         
Deferred Compensation (16,985 ) (64,558 )
         
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments [Note 2] (838,771 ) (266,527 )
         
Deficit (11,285,742 ) (5,654,260 )
         
  (108,185 ) 5,616,421  
         
  191,587   9,025,080  

Approved on behalf of the Board “John G. Robertson”   “Jennifer Lorette”
  John G. Robertson, Director   Jennifer Lorette, Director

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)


Reg Technologies Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Deficit
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

  2005   2004   2003  
       
Revenue      
Operating Expenses            
     Foreign exchange 8,229   5,313   (6,509 )
     General and administrative(1) 862,414   896,848   497,189  
     Impairment loss on development costs 8,545,324      
     Impairment loss on intangible assets (Note 3) 221,830      
     Mineral property maintenance costs 18,588   5,908   5,908  
  9,656,385   908,069   496,588  
Net Loss Before Other Income (Expense) (9,656,385 ) (908,069 ) (496,588 )
Other Income (Expense)            
     Gain (loss) on accounts payable written-off (41 ) 20,694   1,490  
     Gain (loss) on sale of subsidiary’s shares 345,124   128,166   (664 )
     Gain (loss) on issue by subsidiary of its own shares outside            
           the consolidated group [Note 6[a]] 383,130   472,872   (215,878 )
     Interest income 8,130   33   30  
     Non-controlling interest [Note 6[b]] 3,288,560   307,440   376,743  
Net Income (Loss) for the Year (5,631,482 ) 21,136   (334,867 )
Deficit - Beginning of Year (5,654,260 ) (5,675,396 ) (5,340,529 )
Deficit - End of Year (11,285,742 ) (5,654,260 ) (5,675,396 )
             
             
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share (0.25 )   (0.02 )
             
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding 22,178,000   20,317,000   17,078,000  
             
(1) Stock-based compensation is included in the following:            
           General and administrative 91,295   142,530    
           Impairment loss on development costs 13,967      
  105,262   142,530    

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)


Reg Technologies Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

  2005   2004   2003  
       
             
Operating Activities            
             
     Net income (loss) for the year (5,631,482 ) 21,136   (334,867 )
             
     Items not involving cash            
             
           Amortization of deferred compensation and other 105,262   142,530   25,619  
                 stock-based compensation            
           Non-controlling interest (3,288,560 ) (307,440 ) (376,743 )
           Loss (gain) on issue by subsidiary of its own shares (383,130 ) (472,872 ) 215,878  
           Loss (gain) on accounts payable written off 41   (20,694 ) (1,490 )
           Impairment loss on intangible assets 221,830      
           Impairment loss on development costs 8,531,357      
           Donated services 190,455   282,114   288,469  
           Loss (gain) on sale of subsidiary’s shares (345,124 ) (128,166 ) 664  
             
     Changes in non-cash working capital items            
             
           Amounts receivable 3,281   2,012   17,445  
           Prepaid expenses (21,664 ) (38,185 )  
           Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (10,561 ) (47,007 ) (32,820 )
             
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities (628,295 ) (566,572 ) (197,845 )
             
Financing Activities            
             
     Shares issued 73,478   175,000    
     Subscriptions received     41,723  
     Advances from related parties 86,442   328,430   140,729  
     Repayments to related parties (60,041 )    
     Proceeds on sale of marketable securities     3,129  
     Proceeds on subsidiary’s shares issued 422,269   142,400    
     Proceeds on sale of subsidiary’s shares 450,536      
             
  972,684   645,830   185,581  
             
Investing Activities            
             
     Development costs (139,723 ) (149,274 ) (64,284 )
     Patent protection costs (29,008 ) (3,501 ) (2,475 )
             
  (168,731 ) (152,775 ) (66,759 )
             
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash (15,513 ) 86,224   84,322  
             
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 160,145   12,707   5,299  
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Year 6,589   (6,118 ) (11,417 )
             
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Year 166,734   6,589   (6,118 )
             
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities            
             
     Shares issued to settle debt   395,682   442,615  
     Shares of subsidiary issued for services 31,618   123,593   25,619  
     Shares of subsidiary issued for convertible debenture     7,475  
             
Supplemental Disclosures            
             
     Interest paid      
     Income tax paid      

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

1.
Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business
     
The Company is in the business of developing and commercially exploiting an improved axial vane type rotary engine known as the Rand Cam™/Direct Charge Engine and other RandCam™ applications, such as compressors and pumps (the “Technology”). The worldwide marketing and intellectual rights, other than the U.S., are held by the Company, which owns over 6.9 million shares of REGI U.S., Inc. (a U.S. public company). REGI U.S., Inc. owns the U.S. marketing and intellectual rights. Rand Energy Group Inc. and REGI U.S., Inc. have a project cost sharing agreement whereby these companies each fund 50% of the development of the Technology. In November 2004, the Company acquired from Rand Energy Group Inc. the 100% interest in the rights, title and interest in and to the Technology, including all pending and future patent applications in respect of the Technology for all countries except the United States of America, for consideration of $50,000 per year or 5% of net profit, whichever is greater, with payment commencing on November 22, 2005 until the patents expire on the Technology. As at April 30, 2005, Rand Energy Group Inc. owes Reg Technologies $2,809,664 which will be fully repaid prior to royalty obligations due and prior to dividends being paid to the owners of Rand Energy Group Inc.
     
The Company is still in the development stage. These financial statements have been prepared on the basis of a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not generated any revenues from the sale or licensing of the Technology or related applications or achieved operational profitability since inception. The Company’s activities are in the development stage and additional costs for the further advancement and application diversification of the Technology must be incurred. There is substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to generate revenues and to continue as a going concern. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent on its ability to obtain financing and/or the attainment of revenues and profitable operations.
     
The Company’s direct investment in REGI U.S., Inc., together with its ownership in Rand Energy Group Inc., gives it control over 6,902,000 shares of REGI U.S., Inc., which shares had a value of approximately US$4,348,000 as of August 18, 2005. The Company can sell, through a registered broker, up to 224,000 shares of REGI U.S., Inc., being 1% of the issued shares, during any 90-day period.
     
2.
Significant Accounting Policies
     
[a]
Basis of accounting and principles of consolidation
     
 
These consolidated financial statements are prepared using Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and are presented in Canadian dollars. See Note 11 regarding adjustments to reconcile to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
     
 
These financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its 51% owned subsidiary, Rand Energy Group Inc., which owns a 15% interest in REGI U.S., Inc., a U.S. public company listed on the OTC Bulletin Board in the United States. REGI U.S., Inc. continues to be considered a controlled subsidiary for consolidation purposes by way of control through irrevocable voting trusts with other affiliated companies giving the Company the ability to control 60% of the voting shares of REGI U.S., Inc. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
     
[b]
 Use of estimates
     
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, particularly the recoverability of capital assets and goodwill, and recording of liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

2.
Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
       
[c]
Cash and cash equivalents
       
 
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.
       
[d]
Intangible assets
       
 
The Company accounts for goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with CICA 3062, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually by comparing the carrying value to the respective fair value. Intangible assets with estimated useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment by assessing the recoverability of the carrying values. The estimated useful life of the technology and patent protection costs is 20 years.
       
[e]
Development costs
       
 
The Company accounts for development costs in accordance with CICA 3450, “Research and Development Costs”. Amortization of development costs deferred to future periods would commence with commercial production or use of the product and charged as an expense on a systematic and rational basis by reference to the sale or use of the products. Deferred development costs are reviewed annually to ensure the criteria, which previously justified the deferral of costs, is still being met. When the criteria for deferment continue to be met but the amount of deferred development costs that can reasonably regarded as assured for recovery through related future revenues, less relevant costs, is exceeded by the unamortized balance of such costs, the excess is written off as a charge to income of the period. As at April 30, 2005, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $8,545,324 on development costs due to the uncertainty about expected future cash flows from the Technology.
       
[f]
Long-lived assets
       
 
The Company monitors the recoverability of long-lived assets, based on factors such as current market value, future asset utilization, business climate and future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the related assets. The Company's policy is to record an impairment loss in the period when it is determined that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The impairment loss is calculated as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the undiscounted estimate of future cash flows from the asset.
       
[g]
Foreign currency translation
       
 
[i]
Translation of foreign currency transactions and balances
       
   
Revenue, expenses and non-monetary balance sheet items in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing on the transaction dates. Monetary balance sheet items are translated at the rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. The resulting exchange gain or loss is included in operations.
       
 
[ii]
Translation of foreign subsidiary balances
       
   
Assets and liabilities of REGI U.S., Inc. are translated into Canadian dollars at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. The foreign subsidiary’s operating results are translated into Canadian dollars using the average exchange rate for the year with any translation gain or loss deferred and included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
       
   
The accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments, totalling $838,771 to April 30, 2005, is a result of translating assets and liabilities at the rate of exchange on April 30, 2005 as compared to the exchange rate accumulated from the inception of REGI U.S., Inc.


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

2.
Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
       
[h]
Financial instruments
       
 
[i]
Fair values
       
   
The carrying amounts of cash, amounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related parties approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturity
       
 
[ii]
Credit risk
       
   
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by placing its cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions.
       
[i]
Income taxes
       
 
The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Future income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the accounting and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities, and are measured using the tax rates expected to apply when these differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded against any future tax asset if it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized.
       
[j]
Share issue costs
       
 
Costs of issuing shares are offset against the related share proceeds.
       
[k]
Stock-based compensation plans
       
 
During 2004, the Company adopted the fair value method to recognize options granted. Accordingly, all stock-based payments are measured at the fair value of the equity instruments issued on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model and are recognized over the vesting period of instruments. The fair value of stock-based payments is periodically re-measured until counter-party performance is complete, and any changes are recognized over the remaining vesting period. The value of stock- based payments that are fully vested and non-forfeitable at the grant date is measured and recognized at the grant date.
       
[l]
Loss per share
       
 
Basic net earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. The treasury stock method is used for the calculation of diluted net earnings (loss) per share. Stock options and warrants are dilutive when the average market price of the common shares during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options and warrants.
       
[m]
Comparative figures
       
 
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation.


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

3. Intangible Assets

          April 30,   April 30,  
          2005   2004  
      Accumulated   Carrying   Carrying  
Cost    Amortization   Value   Value  
$       $  
                 
Goodwill       285,313  
Mineral resource properties 1     1   1  
Technology and patent protection costs       412,544  
                 
      1   697,858  

During the year, the Company recorded an impairment loss for the goodwill and the technology and patent protection costs of $221,830 due to the uncertainty about cash flows from the patented technology.
     
4.
Share Capital
     
Authorized:
     
50,000,000
Common shares without par value
 
10,000,000
Preferred shares with a $1 par value, redeemable for common shares on the basis of 1 common share for 2 preferred shares
5,000,000
Class A non-voting shares without par value. Special rights and restrictions apply.

      Value  
Common shares issued: #   $  
Issued and outstanding as at April 30, 2003 17,078,371   10,467,921  
Issued during the year        
To settle related party debt 3,956,810   395,682  
For cash pursuant to a private placement 1,000,000   150,000  
For cash pursuant to the exercise of stock options 250,000   25,000  
April 30, 2004 22,285,181   11,038,603  
Less treasury stock owned (183,711 ) (27,557 )
Issued and outstanding as at April 30, 2004 22,101,470   11,011,046  
For cash pursuant to the exercise of stock options 62,500   9,750  
For cash pursuant to the exercise of warrants 272,711   63,728  
April 30, 2005 22,436,681   11,084,524  
Less treasury stock owned (183,711 ) (45,928 )
Issued and outstanding as at April 30, 2005 22,252,970   11,038,596  

 
[a]
Escrowed shares
     
   
93,750 shares are held in escrow, the release of which is subject to the direction and determination of regulatory authorities.
     
 
[b]
Debt settlement
     
   
On June 4, 2003, the Company issued 3,956,810 common shares at a fair value of $0.10 per share to settle related party debt in the amount of $395,682.
     
4.
Share Capital (continued)
     
 
[c]
Private placement


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

   
The Company issued 1,000,000 units at $0.15 per unit and raised $150,000 in October, 2003. Each unit contained one common share and one warrant to acquire one additional share at $0.20 for a one year period expiring September 22, 2004 and $0.25 during the second year expiring September 22, 2005.
     
 
[d]
Treasury shares
     
   
The Company’s subsidiary, Rand Energy Group Inc. (“Rand”), purchased 183,711 units of the private placement discussed in [c] above for $27,557. In addition, Rand exercised its warrants and received 183,711 shares for $45,927 in December, 2004. At April 30, 2005 a total of 367,422 treasury shares were owned by Rand.
     
 
[e]
Stock options
     
   
The Company has implemented a stock option plan (the "Plan") to be administered by the Board of Directors. Pursuant to the Plan the Board of Director’s has discretion to grant options for up to a maximum of 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company at the date the options are granted. The option price under each option shall be not less than the discounted market price on the grant date. The expiry date of an option shall be set by the Board of Directors at the time the option is awarded, and shall not be more than five years after the grant date. No more than 25% of an option may be exercised during any 90-day period during the term of the option; and each optionee is restricted from selling more than 25% of the shares that may be acquired upon exercise of an option during any 90-day period. Options granted to consultants engaged in investor relations activities will vest in stages over a minimum period of 12 months with no more than one-quarter of the options vesting in any three-month period.
     
   
The following table summarizes activity under the Plan for the years April 30, 2005 and 2004:

      Weighted  
      average  
      exercise  
  Number   price  
  of shares   $  
         
Outstanding, April 30, 2003 1,325,000   0.10  
Granted 775,000   0.22  
Exercised (250,000 ) 0.10  
Expired (600,000 ) 0.15  
         
Outstanding, April 30, 2004 1,250,000   0.15  
Exercised (62,500 ) 0.16  
         
Outstanding and exercisable, April 30, 2005 1,187,500   0.15  


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

4.
Share Capital (continued)
     
 
[e]
Stock options
     
   
Additional information regarding options outstanding at April 30, 2005 is as follows:

  Outstanding Exercisable
    Weighted Weighted   Weighted
    average average   Average
    remaining exercise   Exercise
Exercise price Number of contractual price Number of Price
$ shares life (years) $ Shares $
           
0.10 750,000 0.5 0.10 750,000   0.10
0.30 162,500 3.4 0.30 162,500 0.30
0.19 250,000 3.8 0.19 250,000 0.19
0.14 25,000 3.9 0.14 25,000 0.14
           
  1,187,500 1.6 0.15 1,187,500 0.15

In 2004, 775,000 stock options were granted with fair values ranging from $0.01 to $0.13 per option and $18,938 was recorded as stock-based compensation, with $26,372 recorded as deferred compensation and expensed in 2005. The fair value of each option granted was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

Interest rate 3.12%-4.02%
Expected life (in years) 5
Expected volatility . 35%
Expected dividend yield 0%

  [f]
Share purchase warrants
     
 
The following table summarizes the continuity of the Company’s warrants:

      Weighted  
      average  
      exercise  
  Number   price  
  of shares    
         
Outstanding, April 30, 2003    
Issued with private placement (Note 4(c)) 1,000,000   0.20  
         
Outstanding, April 30, 2004 1,000,000   0.20  
Exercised (272,711 ) 0.23  
         
Outstanding, April 30, 2005 727,289   0.25  

The 727,289 warrants outstanding at April 30, 2005 entitle the holder to purchase one common share each at $0.25 per share expiring September 22, 2005.

Subsequent to year-end, 85,343 warrants were exercised, see Note 10[d].


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

5. Share Capital Activity of REGI U.S., Inc.

      Value  
Common shares issued: #   US$  
         
April 30, 2003 17,687,935   5,102,299  
         
     Stock issued for cash-private placement 173,120   25,968  
     Stock issued for services 400,000   92,000  
     Stock issued to settle debt 3,320,000   166,000  
     Stock issued for cash pursuant to:        
           Options exercised 100,000   20,000  
           Warrants exercised 550,000   86,000  
         
April 30, 2004 22,231,055   5,492,267  
         
     Stock issued for services 150,000   24,000  
     Stock issued for cash pursuant to:        
           Options exercised 133,750   29,750  
           Warrants exercised 173,120   34,624  
           Warrants exercised 1,032,800   258,200  
         
April 30, 2005 23,720,725   5,838,841  

  [a]
3,320,000 shares, having an approximate undiscounted fair market value as at August 18, 2005 of US$2,091,600, were owned by the Company as at April 30, 2005.
     
  [b]
Approximately 3,500,000 shares, having an approximate undiscounted fair market value as at August 18, 2005 of US$2,205,000, were owned by Rand Energy Group Inc. as at April 30, 2005. The Company owns 51% of Rand Energy Group Inc.
     
  [c]
A total of 1,612,750 shares are reserved for the exercise of stock options, exercisable at a weighted average price of US$0.26 per share with a weighted average remaining life of 2.25 years.
     
  [d]
Private Placement
     
 
On December 24, 2004, REGI U.S., Inc. closed a private placement offering for 1,032,800 units at a purchase price of US$0.25 per unit for total cash proceeds of US$258,200. Each unit consisted of one common share of REGI U.S., Inc. and one-half non-transferable share purchase warrant. Each two one-half warrants may be exercised within one year of the date of issuance to the purchaser at a price of US$0.35 per share.
     
  [e]
As at April 30, 2005, 516,400 share purchase warrants were outstanding. Each two one-half warrants may be exercised at a price of US$0.35 per share, expiring on December 24, 2005.


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

6.
Non-Monetary Transactions
     
[a]
Gain on shares issued
     
During 2005 and 2004, REGI U.S., Inc. issued shares outside the consolidated group. These issuances effectively reduced Rand Energy Group Inc.’s interest in REGI U.S., Inc., which resulted in a deemed gain (loss) on sale of subsidiary’s shares as follows:

  2005   2004  
     
         
Value received on issuance of shares 426,351   670,377  
Less net book value of interest deemed sold (43,221 ) (197,505 )
         
Monetary Gain (Loss) 383,130   472,872  

  [b] Non-controlling interest

  2005   2004  
     
Non-controlling interest - beginning of year 3,140,445   3,020,985  
Non-controlling interest - end of year   3,140,445  
Increase (decrease) in non-controlling interest (3,140,445 ) 119,460  
Components of the increase (decrease) in non-controlling interest:        
[i]     non-controlling interest in subsidiaries’ net results of operations (3,288,560 ) (307,440 )
[ii]    net book value of REGI U.S., Inc. deemed sold [Note 6[a]] 43,221   197,505  
[iii]   net book value of REGI U.S., Inc. shares sold 104,894   229,395  
  (3,140,445 ) 119,460  

7.
Income Taxes
   
The potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. As at April 30, 2005, the Company has non-capital losses carried forward totalling US$5,433,000 for U.S. tax purposes and $1,543,000 for Canadian tax purposes, which expire starting in 2013 and 2006, respectively. The Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.
   
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate for the year ended April 30, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

  Canada United States
Statutory federal income tax rate 36% 35%
Effect of valuation allowance (36%) (35%)
Effective income tax rate


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

7.
Income Taxes (continued)
   
The tax effect (computed by applying the federal statutory rates as stated above) of the significant temporary differences, which comprise future tax assets and liabilities, are as follows:

    2005     2004  
Future income tax assets            
           Intangible assets $  155,000   $  155,000  
           Property and equipment   69,000     70,000  
           Non-capital loss carry forwards   2,948,000     3,107,000  
Total gross future income tax assets   3,172,000     3,332,000  
Valuation allowance   (3,172,000 )   (3,332,000 )
Net future income tax asset $  –   $  –  

The Company and Rand Energy Group Inc. have combined Canadian income tax losses of approximately $1,543,000, which are available to reduce Canadian taxable income of future years. The losses expire as follows:

  $     $
2006 268,000   2010 190,000
2007 229,000   2014 145,000
2008 361,000   2015 212,000
2009 138,000      

The Company’s U.S. subsidiary, REGI U.S., Inc., has U.S. income tax losses of US$5,433,000, which are available to reduce U.S. taxable income of future years. The losses expire as follows:

  US$     US$
2013 23,000   2020 429,000
2014 393,000   2021 518,000
2015 1,007,000   2022 153,000
2016 792,000   2023 17,000
2017 521,000   2024 258,000
2018 605,000   2025 300,000
2019 417,000      

In assessing the realizability of future tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion of all of the future tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of future tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of future tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The amount of future tax asset considered realizable could change materially in the near term based on future taxable income during the carry forward period.


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

8.
Related Party Transactions
       
[a]
The Company shares office space, staff and service providers with a number of private and public companies with several directors in common.
       
[b]
The transactions are recorded at their exchange amounts, and the amounts owing to related companies, totalling $164,267 (2004 - $122,148) are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand. These companies are related due to the President of the Company controlling or significantly influencing these related companies.
       
[c]
The value of consulting services was contributed as donated capital, by officers and directors of REGI U.S., Inc. US$150,000 (2004 – US$150,000) was charged to operations and $Nil (2004 - US$60,000) was charged to deferred development costs.
       
[d]
Administrative fees, public relations expenses, management fees and director’s fees were paid to the officers, directors and companies controlled by officers and directors totalling $119,696 for services rendered.
       
[e]
On June 4, 2003, the Company issued 3,956,810 common shares at a fair value of $0.10 per share to settle related party debt in the amount of $395,682.
       
The above noted transactions have been in the normal course of operations and, in management’s opinion, undertaken with the same terms and conditions as transactions with unrelated parties.
       
9.
Commitments
       
[a]
In connection with the acquisition of Rand Energy Group Inc. the Company has the following royalty obligations:
       
[i]
A participating royalty is to be paid to the inventor to a maximum amount of $10,000,000. The participating royalty is to be paid in minimum annual instalments of $50,000 per year beginning on the date the first revenues are derived from the license or sale of the patented technology and after shares are issued per above. As part of the minimum payment, the Company is to pay 5% of all net profits from sales, licenses, royalties or income derived from the patented technology.
       
[ii]
Pursuant to a letter of understanding between the Company, REGI U.S., Inc. and REGI (collectively called the grantors) and West Virginia University Research Corporation (WVURC), the grantors have agreed that WVURC shall own 5% of all patented technology and will receive 5% of all net profits from sales, licenses, royalties or income derived from the patented technology.
       
[iii]
1% net profit royalty will be payable to a director on all U.S. based sales.
       
[b]
REGI U.S., Inc. is committed to fund 50% of the further development of the RC/DC Engine.
       
[c]
On April 21, 2005, REGI U.S., Inc. entered into an agreement with a firm that will provide public relations and consulting services for US$5,000 per month.
       
10.
Subsequent Events
       
[a]
In May 27, 2005, REGI U.S., Inc. granted 125,000 stock options to employees and officers, exercisable at US$0.45 per share, up to May 27, 2010.
       
[b]
On June 7, 2005, REGI U.S., Inc. entered into a consulting agreement with a firm that will provide advisory and consulting services in consideration of US$15,000 or the issuance of 50,000 free trading common shares of REGI U.S., Inc.


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

10.
Subsequent Events (continued)
     
[c]
On June 14, 2005, REGI U.S., Inc. entered into a consulting agreement (“the Consulting Agreement”) for the provision of public relations services, in consideration for US$350,000 worth of REGI U.S., Inc.’s common stock. Additionally, on June 14, 2005, REGI U.S., Inc. entered into an agreement with JGR Petroleum Inc. (“JGR”), a private company controlled by the President of the Company. Under the terms of the Agreement, JGR will provide the shares required under the Consulting Agreement.
     
REGI U.S., Inc. will repay JGR from future financings on a non-interest bearing basis.
     
[d]
On June 29, 2005, the Company issued 85,343 shares from exercise of warrants for proceeds of $21,336.
     
[e]
REGI U.S., Inc. entered into a distributor agreement dated June 29, 2005 with Anuvu Incorporated for an option to acquire exclusive rights to distribute the Anuvu fuel cell technology in Canada and Europe. Subsequent to year-end, the Company has paid a total of US $200,000 for the rights in Canada. REGI U.S., Inc. must pay US$150,000 by September 27, 2005 and an additional US$150,000 by November 30, 2005 in exchange for these exclusive rights in Europe. REGI U.S., Inc. has also agreed to issue 200,000 shares of REGI U.S., Inc. to Anuvu upon confirmation of acceptance of the European fuel cell technology patents. Anuvu will receive a royalty of 5% of gross sales. REGI U.S., Inc. will receive 2 warrants of Anuvu’s common stock for every dollar paid for the distribution rights to a maximum of 1,000,000 warrants.
     
[f]
REGI U.S., Inc. issued 43,750 shares upon the exercise of stock options for proceeds of US$10,000.
     
11.
Reconciliation of United States and Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP” and “Canadian GAAP”)
     
The material differences between Canadian GAAP and US GAAP are as follows:
     
[a]
Development costs
     
Development costs, under Canadian GAAP, may be deferred, until the processes reach commercial production, at which time they are amortized on a systematic basis by reference to the sale or use of the processes, or until the project is sold or abandoned, at which time the costs are written-off.
     
Under US GAAP, development costs must be expensed as incurred.
     
[b]
Intangible assets
     
Goodwill and the Technology are treated as intangible assets under Canadian GAAP. Under US GAAP, these relate to and thus, are treated as, research and development, which must be charged to operations as incurred.
     
[c]
Non-controlling interest
     
All development costs and intangible assets with the exception of $1 relating to mineral resource properties (see Note 3) defined under Canadian GAAP were written off during the year. Non- controlling interest was drawn down to zero at April 30, 2005.
     
[d]
Stock-based compensation
     
Under Canadian GAAP, stock-based compensation is recorded using the fair value method (see Note 2[k]). Under US GAAP, stock-based compensation needs to be recorded also for the differential between the market price of the shares and exercise price if the market price exceeds the exercise price when the stock options are granted.


Reg Technologies Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended April 30, 2005 and 2004
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)

11.
Reconciliation of United States and Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP” and “Canadian GAAP“ (continued)
     
[e]
The net income (loss) for the year ended April 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and deficit accumulated during the development stage as determined under US GAAP is as follows:

  2005   2004   2003  
   $      
Net income (loss), as determined under            
     Canadian GAAP (5,631,482 ) 21,136   (334,867 )
     Stock-based compensation   (3,500 )  
     Non-controlling interest (4,519,197 ) (307,440 ) (376,743 )
     Gain on sale of subsidiary’s shares 104,894   229,395   3,793  
     Gain on issue of subsidiary’s shares 43,221   197,505   691,587  
     Impairment loss on intangible assets 9,796,407      
     Development costs written-off (191,535 ) (197,020 ) (47,639 )
Net income (loss), as determined under US            
     GAAP (397,692 ) (59,924 ) (63,869 )
Deficit accumulated during the development            
     stage, as determined under US GAAP            
           - Beginning of year (11,488,428 ) (11,428,504 ) (11,364,635 )
           - End of year (11,886,120 ) (11,488,428 ) (11,428,504 )
             
Loss per share, weighted average basis            
     (excluding escrowed shares) (0.02 )    

  [g]
Material effects of the different generally accepted accounting principles on the Company's balance sheet as at April 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

  2005   2004  
     
Deferred development costs, as determined in Canada   8,314,164  
Deferred development costs, as determined in the U.S.    
Increase to deficit as determined in the U.S.   8,314,164  
Intangible assets and mineral resource properties, as determined        
in Canada 1   697,858  
Intangible assets and mineral resource properties, as determined        
in the U.S. 1   197,825  
Increase to deficit as determined in the U.S.   500,033  
Non-controlling interest, as determined in Canada   (3,140,445 )
Non-controlling interest, as determined in the U.S.    
Decrease to deficit as determined in the U.S.   (3,140,445 )
Stock based compensation, as determined in Canada 219,597   45,310  
Stock based compensation, as determined in the U.S. (219,597 ) (48,810 )
Increase (decrease) to deficit as determined in the U.S.   3,500  
Deficit, as determined in Canada 11,285,742   5,654,260  
Deficit, as determined in the U.S. 12,039,046   11,598,039  
Net increase to deficit as determined in the U.S. 753,304   5,943,779