XML 26 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.4
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2025
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
SPS is involved in various litigation matters in the ordinary course of business. The assessment of whether a loss is probable or is a reasonable possibility, and whether the loss or a range of loss is estimable, often involves a series of complex judgments about future events. Management maintains accruals for losses probable of being incurred and subject to reasonable estimation. 
Management is sometimes unable to estimate an amount or range of a reasonably possible loss in certain situations, including but not limited to when (1) the damages sought are indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages, or (3) the matters involve novel or unsettled legal theories.
In such cases, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the timing or ultimate resolution, including a possible eventual loss. For current proceedings not specifically reported herein, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liabilities, if any, would have a material effect on SPS’ financial statements. Legal fees are generally expensed as incurred.
2024 Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex — On February 26, 2024, multiple wildfires began in the Texas Panhandle, including the Smokehouse Creek Fire and the 687 Reamer Fire, which burned into the perimeter of the Smokehouse Creek Fire (together, referred to herein as the “Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex”). The Texas A&M Forest Service issued incident reports that determined that the Smokehouse Creek Fire and the 687 Reamer Fire were caused by power lines owned by SPS after wooden poles near each fire origin failed. According to the Texas A&M Forest Service’s Incident Viewer and news reports, the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex burned approximately 1,055,000 acres.
SPS is aware of approximately 56 complaints, most of which have also named Xcel Energy Services Inc. as an additional defendant, relating to the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex. The complaints, which assert claims on behalf of one or more plaintiffs, generally allege that SPS’ equipment ignited the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex and seek compensation for losses resulting from the fire, asserting various causes of action under Texas law. In addition to seeking compensatory damages, certain of the complaints also seek exemplary damages. Of the 56 complaints, 22 have been resolved and dismissed.
SPS has received 296 claims through its claims process, net of duplicative, withdrawn and denied claims, and has reached final settlements on 223 of those claims as of the date of this filing. In addition to filed complaints and claims made through SPS’ claims process, SPS has also received information from attorneys for approximately 101 claims which have not been submitted through the claims process and have also not been filed as lawsuits and has reached settlement of 79 of those claims through mediation.
SPS has settled claims related to both of the fatalities believed to be associated with the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex. Settlements have also been reached with the subrogated insurer plaintiffs as well as the three largest claims asserted from the fire, as measured by fire-impacted acreage. Settlements reached as of the date of this filing total $382 million of expected loss payments, of which $374 million and $35 million were paid through Dec. 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
In December 2025, the Texas Attorney General’s office filed a lawsuit against SPS regarding the Smokehouse Creek Fire, seeking monetary damages and civil penalties for losses to property and wildlife resulting from the fires. In February 2026, pending resolution of the lawsuit, SPS and the Texas Attorney General’s office jointly filed a temporary injunction agreeing to certain distribution pole replacement procedures, largely consistent with current procedures.
Based on the current state of the law and the facts and circumstances available as of the date of this filing, Xcel Energy has recorded $430 million of total estimated losses for the matter (before available insurance). A remaining estimated liability of $56 million and $180 million is presented in other current liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The cumulative estimated probable losses of $430 million for complaints and claims in connection with the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex (before available insurance) represents the total of actual settlements reached to date plus the low end of the range for remaining reasonably estimable losses, and is subject to change as additional information becomes available. This $430 million estimate does not include amounts for (i) potential penalties or fines that may be imposed by governmental entities on Xcel Energy, (ii) exemplary or punitive damages, (iii) compensation claims by federal, state, county and local government entities or agencies, (iv) unsettled compensation claims for damage to trees and oil and gas equipment, or (v) other amounts that are not reasonably estimable.
Xcel Energy remains unable to reasonably estimate any additional loss or the upper end of the range because there are a number of unknown facts and legal considerations that may impact the amount of any potential liability, including whether additional complaints and demands may be made. In the event that SPS or Xcel Energy Services Inc. was found liable related to the litigation related to the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex and was required to pay damages, such amounts could exceed our insurance coverage of approximately $500 million for the annual policy period and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The process for estimating losses associated with potential claims related to the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex requires management to exercise significant judgment based on a number of assumptions and subjective factors, including the factors identified above and estimates based on currently available information and prior experience with wildfires. As more information becomes available, management estimates and assumptions regarding the potential financial impact of the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex may change.
Texas law does not apply strict liability in determining an electric utility company’s liability for fire-related damages. For negligence claims under Texas law, a public utility has a duty to exercise ordinary and reasonable care.
Potential liabilities related to the Smokehouse Creek Fire Complex depend on various factors, including the cause of the equipment failure and the extent and magnitude of potential damages, including damages to residential and commercial structures, personal property, vegetation, livestock and livestock feed (including replacement feed), personal injuries and any other damages, penalties, fines or restitution that may be imposed by courts or other governmental entities if SPS is found to have been negligent.
SPS records insurance recoveries when it is deemed probable that recovery will occur, and SPS can reasonably estimate the amount or range. Insurance receivables for estimated losses of approximately $195 million and $210 million, net of recoveries received are presented in prepayments and other current assets as of Dec. 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. While SPS plans to seek recovery of all insured losses, it is unable to predict the ultimate amount and timing of such insurance recoveries.
Rate Matters
SPS is involved in various regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Until resolution, typically in the form of a rate order, uncertainties may exist regarding the ultimate rate treatment for certain activities and transactions. Amounts have been recognized for probable and reasonably estimable losses that may result. Unless otherwise disclosed, any reasonably possible range of loss in excess of any recognized amount is not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.
SPP OATT Upgrade Costs — Costs of transmission upgrades may be recovered from other SPP customers whose transmission service depends on capacity enabled by the upgrade under the SPP OATT. SPP had not been charging its customers for these upgrades, even though the SPP OATT had allowed SPP to do so since 2008. In 2016, the FERC granted SPP’s request to recover these previously unbilled charges and SPP subsequently billed SPS approximately $13 million.
In 2018, SPS’ appeal to the D.C. Circuit over the FERC rulings granting SPP the right to recover previously unbilled charges was remanded to the FERC. In 2019, the FERC reversed its 2016 decision and ordered SPP to refund charges retroactively collected from its transmission customers, including SPS, related to periods before September 2015. In 2020, SPP and Oklahoma Gas & Electric separately filed petitions for review of the FERC’s orders at the D.C. Circuit. In 2021, the D.C. Circuit issued a decision denying these appeals and upholding the FERC’s orders.
In September 2024, the Eighth Circuit issued an additional decision reaffirming the FERC’s decision to order refunds. In September 2025, the FERC issued an order on SPP's refund plan. The FERC directed SPP to provide additional information in a compliance filing, due 45 days after the order. In November 2025, SPP filed a response that is awaiting comment from FERC. SPS has recorded an estimate for a refund in this matter. Any refunds received by SPS are expected to be given back to SPS customers through future rates.
Wind Operating Commitments
Environmental
New and changing federal and state environmental mandates can create financial liabilities for SPS, which are normally recovered through the regulated rate process.
Site Remediation
Various federal and state environmental laws impose liability where hazardous substances or other regulated materials have been released to the environment. SPS may sometimes pay all or a portion of the cost to remediate sites where past activities of their predecessors or other parties have caused environmental contamination.
Environmental contingencies could arise from various situations, including sites of former MGPs; and third-party sites, such as landfills, for which SPS is alleged to have sent wastes to that site.
MGP, Landfill and Disposal Sites
SPS is investigating, remediating or performing post-closure actions at three historical MGP, landfill or other disposal sites across its service territories, excluding sites that are being addressed under current coal ash regulations (see below).
SPS has an immaterial amount of remaining liabilities for resolution of these issues, however, the final outcome and timing are unknown. In addition, there may be regulatory recovery, insurance recovery and/or recovery from other potentially responsible parties, offsetting a portion of costs incurred.
Water and Waste
Coal Ash Regulation SPS is subject to the CCR Rule, which imposes requirements for handling, storage, treatment and disposal of coal ash and other solid waste.
In May 2024, final amendments to the CCR Rule were published, widening its scope to include legacy CCR surface impoundments at inactive facilities and previously exempt areas where CCR was placed directly on land at CCR-regulated facilities, including areas of beneficial use.
As a requirement of the CCR Rule, utilities must complete facility evaluations and groundwater sampling around their subject landfills, surface impoundments and certain other areas where coal ash was placed on land.
If certain impacts to groundwater are detected, utilities are required to perform additional groundwater investigations and/or perform corrective actions, beginning with an Assessment of Corrective Measures.
SPS expects to incur $4 million for investigations through 2028 to perform required reporting and assess whether corrective actions are necessary. AROs have been recorded for each of these activities, and amounts are expected to be recoverable through regulatory mechanisms.
SPS continues to perform site investigation activities related to the CCR Rule, which may result in updates to estimated costs as well as identification of additional required corrective actions.
In February 2026, the EPA issued a final rule amending the CCR Legacy rule. The ruling extends deadlines for various regulatory actions and clarifies previous information regarding implementation of the rule. SPS is still evaluating the final rule, but anticipates impacts to be consistent with prior accruals.
Environmental Requirements Air
AROs — AROs have been recorded for SPS’ assets, as follows:
2025
(Millions of Dollars)Jan. 1, 2025AccretionDec. 31, 2025
Electric
Steam and other production$102 $$107 
Wind55 57 
Distribution10 — 10 
Total liability$167 $$174 

2024
(Millions of Dollars)Jan. 1, 2024
Amounts Incurred (a)
AccretionCash Flow RevisionsDec. 31, 2024
Electric
Steam and other production$87 $$$$102 
Wind56 — (3)55 
Distribution10 — — — 10 
Total liability$153 $$$(2)$167 
(a)Amounts incurred pertain to CCR coal ash regulations and the Harrington pipeline which was placed in service in 2024.
Indeterminate AROs — Outside of the recorded asbestos AROs, other plants or buildings may contain asbestos due to the age of many of SPS’ facilities, but no confirmation or measurement of the cost of removal could be determined as of Dec. 31, 2025. Therefore, an ARO has not been recorded for these facilities.
Leases
ROU assets represent SPS's rights to use leased assets. The present value of future operating lease payments is recognized in other current operating lease liabilities and noncurrent operating lease liabilities. These amounts, adjusted for any prepayments or incentives, are recognized as ROU assets.
Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are classified as short-term leases and are not recognized on the balance sheet.
Operating lease ROU assets:
(Millions of Dollars)Dec. 31, 2025Dec. 31, 2024
PPAs$500 $500 
Other44 44 
Gross operating lease ROU assets544 544 
Accumulated amortization(207)(173)
Net operating lease ROU assets$337 $371 
Commitments under operating leases as of Dec. 31, 2025:
(Millions of Dollars)
PPA (a) (b)
Operating
Leases
Other Operating
Leases
Total
Operating
Leases
2026$46 $$49 
202746 49 
202846 50 
202946 50 
203046 50 
Thereafter128 25 153 
Total minimum obligation358 43 401 
Interest component of obligation(55)(9)(64)
Present value of minimum obligation303 34 337 
Less current portion(36)
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities$301 
Weighted-average remaining lease term in years8.1
(a)Amounts do not include PPAs accounted for as executory contracts and/or contingent payments, such as energy payments on renewable PPAs.
(b)PPA operating leases contractually expire at various dates through 2033.
VIEs
PPAs Under certain PPAs, SPS purchases power from IPPs for which SPS is required to reimburse fuel costs, or to participate in tolling arrangements under which SPS procures the natural gas required to produce the energy that it purchases. SPS has determined that certain IPPs are VIEs. SPS is not subject to risk of loss from the operations of these entities, and no significant financial support is required other than contractual payments for energy and capacity.
In addition, certain solar PPAs provide an option to purchase emission allowances or sharing provisions related to production credits generated by the solar facility under contract. These specific PPAs create a variable interest in the IPP.
SPS evaluated each of these VIEs for possible consolidation, including review of qualitative factors such as the length and terms of the contract, control over O&M, control over dispatch of electricity, historical and estimated future fuel and electricity prices, and financing activities. SPS concluded that these entities are not required to be consolidated in its financial statements because it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance.
SPS had 1,197 MW of capacity under long-term PPAs at both Dec. 31, 2025 and 2024 with entities that have been determined to be VIEs. These agreements have expiration dates through 2048.
Fuel Contracts — SPS purchases all of its coal requirements for its Tolk plant from TUCO Inc. under contracts that will expire in December 2027. TUCO arranges for the purchase, receiving, transporting, unloading, handling, crushing, weighing and delivery of coal to meet SPS’ requirements. TUCO is responsible for negotiating and administering contracts with coal suppliers, transporters and handlers.
SPS has not provided any significant financial support to TUCO, other than contractual payments for delivered coal. However, the fuel contracts create a variable interest in TUCO due to SPS’ reimbursement of fuel procurement costs.
SPS has determined that TUCO is a VIE, however it has concluded that SPS is not the primary beneficiary because it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact TUCO’s economic performance.