-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, D+ILua8R4Jd++dR7Z13G3nzCfrd4hySIM7XzpRhFTSvGVYkwVoU9eBU2zm7s0kR1 1oPGd6uAFozceMo03L7MgA== 0000925178-06-000019.txt : 20060512 0000925178-06-000019.hdr.sgml : 20060512 20060512164936 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000925178-06-000019 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20060402 FILED AS OF DATE: 20060512 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20060512 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: MOVIE GALLERY INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000925178 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-VIDEO TAPE RENTAL [7841] IRS NUMBER: 631120122 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0103 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-24548 FILM NUMBER: 06835536 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 900 WEST MAIN STREET CITY: DOTHAN STATE: AL ZIP: 36301 BUSINESS PHONE: 3346772108 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 900 WEST MAIN STREET CITY: DOTHAN STATE: AL ZIP: 36301 10-Q 1 r10q-q1.txt 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended April 2, 2006 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _______ Commission File Number 0-24548 Movie Gallery, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) DELAWARE 63-1120122 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 900 West Main Street, Dothan, Alabama 36301 (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code) (334) 677-2108 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value (including associated rights to purchase shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock or Common Stock) (Title of class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X] The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock as of May 2, 2006 was 31,787,888. Part I - Financial Information Forward Looking Statements This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which represent our expectations or beliefs about future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are identifiable by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical information and may include words such as "believe," "anticipate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "will," "may," "estimate" or other similar expressions and variations thereof. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements are based on management's current intent, belief, expectations, estimates and projections regarding our company and our industry. Forward- looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our ability to comply with the covenants contained in our Credit Facility, our ability to make projected capital expenditures and our ability to achieve cost savings in connection with our acquisition of Hollywood Entertainment Corporation, as well as general market conditions, competition and pricing. Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including that, but not limited to: - - revenues are less than projected; - - the Company is unable to comply with the revised financial covenants contained in its senior credit facility; - - the Company's real estate subleasing program and other initiatives fail to generate anticipated cost reductions; - - the availability of new movie releases priced for sale negatively impacts the consumers' desire to rent movies; - - unforeseen issues with the continued integration of the Hollywood Entertainment business; - - the Company's actual expenses or liquidity requirements differ from estimates and expectations; - - consumer demand for movies and games is less than expected; - - the availability of movies and games is less than expected; or - - competitive pressures are greater than anticipated. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this Form 10-Q might not occur. In addition, actual results could differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements, and therefore you should not place undue reliance on the forward- looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We desire to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and in that regard we caution the readers of this Form 10-Q that the important factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006, among others, could affect our actual results of operations and may cause changes in our strategy with the result that our operations and results may differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us, or on our behalf. Item 1. Financial Statements Movie Gallery, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands, except per share amounts) ------------------------- January 1, April 2, 2006 2006 ----------- ----------- (Unaudited) Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 135,238 $ 34,468 Merchandise inventory, net 136,450 127,049 Prepaid expenses 41,393 45,543 Store supplies and other 24,194 25,692 ----------- ----------- Total current assets 337,275 232,752 Rental inventory, net 371,565 358,038 Property, furnishings and equipment, net 332,218 310,609 Goodwill, net 118,404 117,664 Other intangibles, net 184,671 184,159 Deposits and other assets 40,995 44,982 ----------- ----------- Total assets $ 1,385,128 $ 1,248,204 =========== =========== Liabilities and stockholders' deficit Current liabilities: Current maturities of long-term obligations $ 78,146 $ 773,380 Current maturities of financing obligations 4,492 2,148 Accounts payable 236,989 132,976 Accrued liabilities 88,460 82,191 Accrued payroll 38,624 35,416 Accrued interest 7,220 15,891 Deferred revenue 39,200 33,604 ----------- ---------- Total current liabilities 493,131 1,075,606 Long-term obligations, less current portion 1,083,083 322,126 Other accrued liabilities 21,662 21,773 Deferred income taxes 70 70 Stockholders' deficit: Preferred stock, $.10 par value; 2,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding - - Common stock, $.001 par value; 65,000 shares authorized, 31,686 and 31,777 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 32 32 Additional paid-in capital 199,151 195,206 Unearned compensation (4,128) - Retained deficit (417,882) (377,532) Accumulated other comprehensive income 10,009 10,923 ----------- ----------- Total stockholders' deficit (212,818) (171,371) ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $ 1,385,128 $ 1,248,204 =========== =========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement. Movie Gallery, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts) Thirteen Weeks Ended ----------------------- April 3, April 2, 2005 2006 --------- --------- Revenue: Rentals $ 216,741 $ 570,427 Product sales 17,050 123,938 --------- --------- Total revenue 233,791 694,365 Cost of sales: Cost of rental revenue 66,360 173,577 Cost of product sales 12,190 93,879 -------- --------- Gross profit 155,241 426,909 Operating costs and expenses: Store operating expenses 108,479 314,079 General and administrative 15,592 44,589 Amortization of intangibles 600 733 -------- -------- Operating income 30,570 67,508 Interest expense, net (80) (27,454) Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities (337) - -------- -------- Income before income taxes 30,153 40,054 Income taxes 11,760 (293) -------- -------- Net income $ 18,393 $ 40,347 ======== ======== Net income per share: Basic $ 0.59 $ 1.27 Diluted $ 0.58 $ 1.27 Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 31,199 31,691 Diluted 31,588 31,754 Cash dividends per common share $ 0.03 $ - The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement. Movie Gallery, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited, in thousands) Thirteen Weeks Ended ----------------------- April 3, April 2, 2005 2006 --------- ---------- Operating activities: Net income $ 18,393 $ 40,347 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Rental inventory amortization 20,429 65,372 Purchases of rental inventory (20,441) (45,943) Purchases of rental inventory-base stock (3,258) (5,903) Depreciation and intangibles amortization 8,801 26,718 Stock based compensation 141 420 Tax benefit of stock options exercised 2,175 - Amortization of debt issuance cost - 1,532 Deferred income taxes 3,584 - Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions: Merchandise inventory (894) 9,465 Other current assets (6,138) (5,558) Deposits and other assets (755) 946 Accounts payable (14,575) (104,012) Accrued interest - 8,669 Accrued liabilities and deferred revenue 2,590 (12,636) --------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 10,052 (20,583) Investing activities: Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired (4,654) (243) Purchase of property, furnishings and equipment (10,612) (8,983) Proceeds from disposal of property, furnishings and equipment - 533 Acquisition of construction phase assets, net (non-cash) - 2,331 --------- --------- Net cash used in investing activities (15,266) (6,362) Financing activities: Repayment of capital lease obligations - (163) Decrease in financing obligations (non-cash) - (2,345) Net borrowings (repayments) on credit facilities - (6,862) Debt financing fees - (5,528) Principal payments on debt - (58,839) Proceeds from exercise of stock options 3,475 - Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan 169 - Payment of dividends (945) - --------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 2,699 (73,737) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (394) (88) --------- --------- Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (2,909) (100,770) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 25,518 135,238 --------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 22,609 $ 34,468 ========= ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement. Movie Gallery, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) April 2, 2006 1. Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation The accompanying financial statements present the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Movie Gallery, Inc., and subsidiaries (the "Company"). Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries where we have significant influence but do not have control are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. We account for investments in entities where we do not have significant influence using the cost method. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. The balance sheet at January 1, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the thirteen week period ended April 2, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006. Reclassifications and Revisions Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on stockholders' equity or net income. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 we began to classify purchases of rental inventory-base stock in operating activities rather than investing activities. The accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 has been revised to reflect all purchases of rental inventory as operating cash flows. The statement of cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005, has also been revised to reclassify the book cost of previously viewed movie sales from rental inventory amortization as a reduction of purchases of rental inventory to be consistent with the presentation of the current year first quarter. On March 29, 2005, the SEC published Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 ("SAB 107"), which provides the Staff's views on a variety of matters relating to stock-based payments. SAB 107 requires that stock-based compensation be classified in the same expense line items as cash compensation. Accordingly, stock-based compensation for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 has been reclassified in the statement of operations to correspond to current period presentation within the same operating expense line items as cash compensation paid to employees. Change in Accounting Estimate for Rental Inventory We regularly review, evaluate and update our rental amortization accounting estimates. Effective January 2, 2006, we reduced the amount capitalized on DVD revenue sharing units for the Movie Gallery segment such that the carrying value of the units, when combined with revenue sharing expense on previously viewed sales, more closely approximates the carrying value of non-revenue sharing units. We also began to amortize games on an accelerated method for the Movie Gallery segment effective January 2, 2006, in order to remain consistent with observed changes in rental patterns for games. These changes were accounted for as a change in accounting estimate, which increased cost of rental revenue by approximately $6.8 million and reduced net income by $6.8 million (net of tax), or $0.21 per diluted share for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented, increased by the effects of non-vested stock, and shares to be issued from the exercise of dilutive common stock options (389,000 and 64,000 for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 and April 2, 2006, respectively). Stock Based Compensation In June 2003, our Board of Directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, the Movie Gallery, Inc. 2003 Stock Plan, which was subsequently amended in June 2005 (Second Amendment) to reserve an additional 3,500,000 shares of our common stock for future grants of awards. The plan provides for the award of stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights to employees, directors and consultants. Prior to adoption of the 2003 plan, stock option awards were subject to our 1994 Stock Plan which expired in 2004. As of April 2, 2006, 5,417,033 shares are reserved for issuance under the plans. Options granted under the plans have a ten-year term and generally vest over four years. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25") and followed the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), as amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure". Accordingly, compensation expense was not recognized in our consolidated statement of operations in connection with stock options that were granted under our stock-based compensation plan, except for the variable options as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006. Effective with our fiscal year beginning January 2, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123(R)"), which no longer permits use of the intrinsic value method under APB No. 25. We used the modified prospective method to adopt SFAS No. 123(R), which requires that compensation expense be recorded for all stock-based compensation granted on or after January 1, 2006, as well as the unvested portion of previously granted options. On December 2, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a resolution to vest all stock options outstanding as of December 2, 2005. The Board decided to fully vest these specific out-of-the-money options, as there was no perceived value in these options to the employee, there were few retention ramifications, and to minimize the expense to our consolidated financial statements upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). This acceleration of the original vesting schedules affected 716,000 unvested stock options. As a result, there is no compensation expense associated with stock options granted prior to January 2, 2006 in the consolidated statements of operations. No assumptions regarding the underlying value of these previously granted stock options were changed upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Under SFAS No. 123(R), the modified prospective method requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to vest. The fair value of non-vested share grants is based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock. No stock options were granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. However, we expect to use the Black-Scholes valuation model for future stock option grants in order to determine fair value. This is consistent with the valuation techniques that were previously utilized for options in footnote disclosures required under SFAS No. 123. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires significant estimates, and to the extent that actual results or updated estimates differ from current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period that estimates are revised. Actual results and future changes in estimates may differ substantially from the current estimates. Because we implemented SFAS No. 123(R), there are no longer any employee stock awards subject to variable accounting treatment. The weighted-average assumptions used and weighted-average grant-date fair values of options were as follows: Thirteen Weeks Fiscal Year Ended Ended ----------------------- ---------- January 2, January 1, April 2, 2005 2006 2006 ---------- ---------- ---------- Expected volatility 0.632 0.626 - Risk-free interest rate 2.97% 3.05% -% Expected life of option in years 3.4 3.0 - Expected dividend yield 0.6% 5.7% -% Weighted average grant date fair value per share $ 8.70 $ 7.43 $ - The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not result in any changes in our assumptions regarding estimated future forfeitures; therefore, no cumulative adjustment from accounting change is included in our consolidated statement of operations. Valuation of awards of service-based non-vested shares were accounted for similarly under APB No. 25, SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 123(R), in that all three methods required the use of the grant date fair value as the basis for future expense recognition. Treatment of performance-based non-vested share awards, however, differs between APB No. 25 and SFAS No. 123(R). APB No. 25 required quarterly revaluation of outstanding shares granted based on the quoted market price of our stock, thus resulting in quarterly cumulative adjustments to the extent that prior periods' expense was restated to reflect the new underlying value of the non-vested shares. SFAS No. 123(R), however, values performance- based non-vested shares at the quoted market price of our stock as of the grant date, with no remeasurement. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), cash retained as the result of cash deductions relating to stock-based compensation was presented in operating cash flows, along with other tax cash flows, in accordance with the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 00-15, "Classification in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Income Tax benefit Received by a Company upon Exercise of a Nonqualified Employee Stock Option." SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes EITF 00-15, amends SFAS No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows", and requires tax benefits relating to excess stock-based compensation deductions to be prospectively presented in the statement of cash flows as financing cash inflows. There were no significant tax benefits resulting from stock-based compensation deductions in excess of amounts reported for financial reporting purposes for the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Fair Value Disclosures - Prior to SFAS No. 123(R) Adoption Stock-based compensation for the three months ended April 3, 2005 was determined using the intrinsic value method. The following table provides supplemental information for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 as if stock- based compensation had been computed under SFAS No. 123 (in thousands, except per share data): Thirteen Weeks Ended -------------------- April 3, 2005 --------- Net income, as reported $ 18,393 Add: Stock based compensation included in reported net income, net of tax 86 Deduct: Stock based compensation determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of tax (279) --------- Pro forma net income $ 18,200 ========= Net income per share, as reported: Basic $ 0.59 Diluted $ 0.58 Pro forma net income per share: Basic $ 0.58 Diluted $ 0.58 A summary of our stock option activity and related information is as follows: Weighted- Outstanding Average Exercise Options Price Per Share ------------ --------------- Outstanding at January 4, 2004 2,636,093 10.36 Granted 102,000 19.36 Exercised (875,884) 6.31 Cancelled (268,653) 13.71 ------------ Outstanding at January 2, 2005 1,593,556 12.59 Granted 29,500 17.33 Exercised (575,148) 9.25 Cancelled (71,157) 17.83 ------------ Outstanding at January 1, 2006 976,751 14.33 Granted - 0.00 Exercised - 0.00 Cancelled (43,375) 18.38 ------------ Outstanding at April 2, 2006 933,376 14.14 ============ Exercisable at January 2, 2005 1,024,181 9.34 Exercisable at January 1, 2006 976,751 14.33 Exercisable at April 2, 2006 933,376 14.14 The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $8.9 million and $0 for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively. Options outstanding as of April 2, 2006 had a weighted-average remaining contractual life of approximately 6 years and exercise prices ranging from $1.00 to $22.00 as follows: Exercise price of ----------------------------------------------- $1.00 to $6.00 to $13.00 to $3.00 $12.00 $22.00 -------------- --------------- ---------------- Options outstanding 181,864 78,750 672,762 Weighted-average exercise price $1.64 $6.22 $18.44 Weighted-average remaining contractual life 3.7 years 0.6 years 7.1 years Options exercisable 181,864 78,750 672,762 Weighted-average exercise price of exercisable options $1.64 $6.22 $18.44 Service-based nonvested share awards vest over periods ranging from one to four years. Compensation expense, representing the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the date of issuance over the nominal purchase price of the shares, is charged to earnings over the vesting period. Compensation expense charged to operations related to these stock grants was $1.2 million and $0.3 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively. The total grant date fair value of service- based share awards vested during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 was $0 and $1.1 million, respectively. Following is a summary of our service-based nonvested share activity: Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Shares Value ---------- ------------------ Outstanding at January 2, 2005 - $ - Granted 219,431 25.85 Cancelled (13,000) 29.45 ---------- Outstanding at January 1, 2006 206,431 25.62 Granted - - Vested (50,006) 22.94 Cancelled (50,472) 29.20 ---------- Outstanding at April 2, 2006 105,953 25.18 ========== Performance-based nonvested share awards entitle participants to acquire shares of stock upon attainment of specified performance goals. Compensation cost of $0.4 million and $0.1 million for performance-based stock grants were recognized for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively, using the accelerated expense attribution method under SFAS Interpretation No. 28 (EITF 00-23). Following is a summary of our performance-based nonvested share activity: Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Shares Value ---------- ------------------ Outstanding at January 2, 2005 - $ - Granted 113,000 23.79 Cancelled (6,250) 12.83 ---------- Outstanding at January 1, 2006 106,750 24.43 Granted - - Vested (40,875) 29.48 Cancelled (31,250) 12.83 ---------- Outstanding at April 2, 2006 34,625 28.94 ========== The total grant date fair value of performance-based share awards vested during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 was $0 and $1.2 million, respectively. Total compensation cost related to all non-vested awards that is not yet recognized was $2.8 million at April 2, 2006, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years. 2. Business Combinations Merger of Movie Gallery and Hollywood On April 27, 2005, Movie Gallery and Hollywood Entertainment Corporation ("Hollywood") completed their previously announced merger pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 9, 2005 (the "Merger Agreement"). Upon the consummation of the merger, Hollywood became a wholly- owned subsidiary of Movie Gallery. As of the date of the merger, Hollywood operated 2,031 specialty home video retail stores and 20 free-standing video game stores throughout the United States. The merger was made as a strategic expansion of our geographic and urban markets. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Hollywood shareholders received $13.25 in cash for each Hollywood share owned. Approximately $862.1 million in cash was paid in exchange for (i) all outstanding common stock of Hollywood and (ii) all outstanding vested and unvested stock options of Hollywood. Hollywood's outstanding indebtedness was repaid at the time of the merger for a total of $381.5 million, of which $161.4 million was paid by Hollywood with the remainder funded by Movie Gallery with proceeds from a new credit facility and the issuance of $325.0 million principal amount of 11% Senior notes due 2012. The total consideration paid was approximately $1.1 billion, including transaction costs of $10.0 million. The merger has been treated as a purchase business combination for accounting purposes, and as such, Hollywood's assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been recorded at their estimated fair values. The purchase price for the acquisition, including transaction costs, has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition, April 27, 2005. The purchase price allocation is substantially final for all items except deferred income taxes, and further adjustments may be required in 2006 as we complete the analysis of the acquired tax basis of certain assets and carryover tax attributes of Hollywood. The purchase price allocation has been revised in the periods following the acquisition in accordance with SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," to reflect revisions in our estimates of the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed to correct certain accounts in Hollywood's acquisition date balance sheet. The table below presents a summary of our initial purchase price allocation, together with subsequent revisions and the resulting revised allocation reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets (in thousands): Initial Subsequent As Allocation Revisions Adjusted Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 18,733 $ - $ 18,733 Extended viewing fees receivable, net 21,369 - 21,369 Merchandise inventory 122,468 - 122,468 Prepaid expenses 27,632 - 27,632 Store supplies and other 18,146 (5,307) 12,839 ---------- --------- ---------- Total current assets 208,348 (5,307) 203,041 Rental inventory 227,800 - 227,800 Property, furnishings and equipment 238,279 (83) 238,196 Goodwill 474,990 3,752 478,742 Other intangibles 183,894 - 183,894 Deferred income taxes 64,944 (13,708) 51,236 Deposits and other assets 1,662 - 1,662 ---------- --------- ---------- Total assets acquired 1,399,917 (15,346) 1,384,571 Liabilities Current Liabilities: Current maturities of long-term obligations 557 - 557 Current maturities of financing obligations 10,385 - 10,385 Accounts payable 182,963 (14,728) 168,235 Accrued liabilities 65,507 6,697 72,204 Accrued payroll 19,691 (1,147) 18,544 Accrued interest 39 - 39 Deferred revenue 27,552 (6,168) 21,384 ---------- --------- ---------- Total current liabilities 306,694 (15,346) 291,348 Long-term obligations, less current portion 941 - 941 Total liabilities 307,635 (15,346) 292,289 ---------- --------- ---------- Net assets acquired $1,092,282 $ - $1,092,282 ========== ========= ========== The initial allocation shown above was based on the unaudited balance sheet as of April 27, 2005, and our preliminary estimates of fair value, which were revised and adjusted throughout fiscal 2005 and first quarter of 2006 as we completed the analysis of various balance sheet accounts and refined the estimates of the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. For the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, adjustments were made to the purchase price allocation for accrued liabilities, deferred income taxes, and accounts receivable. Following is a summary of the nature of the significant revisions and the facts and circumstances that required the revisions shown in the preceding table: - - Store supplies and other: We decreased the balance in store supplies by $5.4 million based on the results of subsequent physical inventories and revised estimates. We increased legal related receivables by $0.1 million related to pre-acquisition legal contingencies and the related insurance coverage. - - Deferred income taxes: We wrote-off Hollywood's pre-acquisition deferred income tax balances and set-up new deferred income tax balances based on the differences between the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and their underlying tax basis, including amounts assigned to Hollywood's carryover tax attributes The net impact of these adjustments decreased deferred tax assets by $13.7 million. - - Accounts payable: During fiscal 2005, we completed an analysis of accounts payable to our studio vendors based on detailed reconciliations and revised estimates, the net effect of which decreased accounts payable by $14.7 million as of April 27, 2005. - - Accrued liabilities: The revisions to the initial allocation included: - recorded a $6.6 million liability for employee separation costs for Hollywood employees who were terminated shortly before and after the merger in accordance with EITF 95-3, "Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination." - adjusted Hollywood's favorable and unfavorable operating leases to net fair value of $2.9 million, based on a report received from an independent valuation consultant in the third quarter. - reduced Hollywood's pre-acquisition legal contingencies $1.2 million to the amount we concluded was probable based on management's assessment of the individual matters using all available information. - reduced accruals for Hollywood's pre-merger expenses by $2.0 million to reflect the actual amounts paid. - established $3.4 million in reserves for store closures in accordance with EITF 95-3 to reflect the cost of remaining lease obligations for closed stores and other costs associated with 50 Game Crazy departments that were closed shortly after the merger. - recorded a reduction of $3.0 million in income tax and franchise tax liabilities based on subsequent analyses of Hollywood's tax accounts, after giving consideration to the effects of merger related transactions. - - Accrued payroll: We reduced our estimate of Hollywood's accrued bonuses by $1.1 million to reflect actual amounts subsequently earned (considering the impact of employee separations and changes to the bonus plans implemented as of the transaction date by Movie Gallery). - - Deferred revenue: We decreased Hollywood's deferred revenue associated with stored value (gift) card by $6.2 million to reflect the estimated fair value associated with redemptions in accordance with EITF 01-3, "Accounting in a Business Combination for Deferred Revenue of an Acquiree." This adjustment was determined, in part, based on an analysis of the fair value completed by the valuation advisors in the third quarter. We allocated approximately $183.9 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets, of which approximately $170.9 relates to the indefinite- lived trade name of Hollywood Video. The remaining intangible assets include finite-lived trade names and customer lists, which will be amortized over their estimated useful lives which are 15 years and 5 years, respectively. The fair value of these intangible assets was determined by independent valuations advisors. After giving consideration to the effect of the revisions described above, we allocated a total of $478.7 million to goodwill, of which an impairment charge of $361.2 million was recorded against in 2005. We paid a substantial premium to acquire Hollywood for several reasons, including: - - Expanded geographic footprint: The merger created a strong number two competitor in the specialty home video retail industry that combines Hollywood's prime urban superstore locations with Movie Gallery's substantial presence in rural and suburban markets. The two companies possessed minimal store overlap as a result of Movie Gallery's significant East Coast presence and focus on rural and suburban locations and Hollywood's significant West Coast presence and focus on urban locations. - - Cost savings: The combined operations of Movie Gallery and Hollywood are expected to achieve cost benefits resulting from the reduction of duplicative general and administrative costs and the realization of scale economies with respect to products and services purchased from studios and merchandisers. - - Operating efficiencies: The combined operations of Movie Gallery and Hollywood are expected to improve operational performance due to greater distribution density, consolidation of duplicative functions and the adoption of best practices at the 4,773 store locations for the combined company. In addition, in order to acquire Hollywood, we participated in a competitive bidding process against Leonard Green & Partners L.L.P. and Blockbuster, Inc. Our successful bid was $1.25 per share lower than Blockbuster, Inc.'s bid. However, Hollywood's stock (NASDAQ: HLYW) was trading at a significant premium to book value due, in part, to merger and acquisition speculation. The operations of Hollywood Entertainment have been included in our consolidated results of operations from April 27, 2005 forward. The following pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the merger had taken place as of the beginning of 2005, nor is it indicative of future results. In addition, the following pro forma information has not been adjusted to reflect any operating efficiencies that may be realized as a result of the merger, except for the elimination of certain redundant executive compensation costs for terminated corporate personnel, substantially all of which occurred shortly after the merger. The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of Movie Gallery and Hollywood Entertainment for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of fiscal year 2005. (in thousands, except per share data). (unaudited) 13 weeks ended April 3, 2005 -------------- Total revenue $ 709,276 Operating income 80,132 Net income 35,294 Net income per share: Basic 1.13 Diluted 1.12 The summary pro forma data includes adjustments to depreciation, amortization and lease expenses to reflect the allocation of purchase price to record Hollywood's assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values. In addition, pro forma net income reflects increases in interest expense related to the incremental borrowings under our bank credit facilities and Senior Notes as if such financing had taken place at the beginning of fiscal year 2005. The historical financial data of Hollywood (not separately presented herein) for periods prior to the merger (included in the pro forma presentation above), includes $5.8 million (before taxes) of transaction costs and professional services related to merger activities incurred in the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005. Merger Reserves We established merger reserves, which were treated as liabilities of the acquired business at the date of acquisition, relating to executives and other employees that were terminated shortly after the merger, including some that were terminated as part of our integration efforts, in accordance with EITF 95- 3, "Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination." During the second quarter of 2005, we notified 92 Hollywood employees of the decision to eliminate their positions in connection with these integration efforts. We recorded a $6.6 million reserve for costs associated with severance and benefits for the impacted individuals. Payments to these individuals will be made over the severance period in accordance with our severance agreements. Total payments of $2.5 million and $0.8 million were made for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively, leaving a $3.3 million reserve as of April 2, 2006. We closed 50 Game Crazy departments shortly after the acquisition date for a total cash cost of $0.3 million. The costs associated with these department closures were not charged to current operations, but rather were recognized as acquired liabilities in purchase accounting, resulting in an increase to goodwill. 3. Property, Furnishings and Equipment Property, furnishings and equipment consists of the following (in thousands): ----------- ---------- January 1, April 2, 2006 2006 ----------- ---------- Land and buildings $ 19,372 $ 20,379 Fixtures and equipment 280,532 280,474 Leasehold improvements 248,525 247,579 Construction phase assets 4,542 2,211 Equipment under capital lease 1,659 1,659 ----------- ---------- 554,630 552,302 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (222,412) (241,693) ----------- ---------- $ 332,218 $ 310,609 =========== ========== Accumulated depreciation and amortization, as presented above, includes accumulated amortization of assets under capital leases of $0.3 and $0.4 million at January 1, 2006 and April 2, 2006, respectively. Depreciation expense related to property, furnishings and equipment was $ 8.1 million and $25.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 and April 2, 2006, respectively. 4. Income Taxes We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires that deferred assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion of or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In the ordinary course of business, there may be many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. No assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different than what is reflected in the current and historical income tax provisions and accruals. The effective tax rate was a provision of 39.0% and a benefit of 0.7% for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 and April 2, 2006 respectively. The projected annual effective tax rate is a provision of 3.8% which differs from the benefit of 0.7% for the quarter ended April 2, 2006 due to unique items the Company recognized during the quarter, including a tax benefit related to a decrease in the valuation allowance and a change in estimate of state taxes payable for the year ended January 1, 2006. The decrease in the annual effective rate is primarily a result of changes in previously established valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets. Because of the existence of the valuation allowance, we generally expect that our federal income tax provision will be very low or negligible until such time as the valuation allowance is depleted through future taxable income or we determine it is no longer necessary. Likewise, we do not currently expect that we will be able to recognize any significant federal income tax benefit on future net operating losses because those benefits would most likely cause us to increase the valuation allowance by a corresponding amount in the foreseeable future. 5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The components of goodwill and other intangible assets are as follows (in thousands): January 1, 2006 April 2, 2006 Weighted- ------------------------ --------------------- Average Gross Gross Amortization Carrying Accumulated Carrying Accumulated Period Amount Amortization Amount Amortization ------------ -------- ------------ -------- ------------ Goodwill Segments: Movie Gallery - $ - $ - $ 141 $ - Hollywood Video - 118,404 - 117,523 - -------- ------------ -------- ------------ Total goodwill $118,404 $ - $117,664 $ - ======== ============ ======== ============ Other intangible assets: Non-compete agreements 8 years $ 12,205 $ (10,110) $ 12,242 $ (10,326) Trademarks: Hollywood Video Indefinite 170,959 - 171,142 - Game Crazy 15 years 4,000 (178) 4,000 (244) Customer lists 5 years 8,994 (1,199) 8,994 (1,649) -------- ------------ -------- ------------ $196,158 $ (11,487) $196,378 $ (12,219) ======== ============ ======== ============ Estimated amortization expense for other intangible assets for fiscal year 2006 and the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows (in thousands): 2006 2,315 2007 2,690 2008 2,471 2009 2,285 2010 954 2011 24 The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, are as follows (in thousands): Net balance as of January 2, 2005 $ 143,761 Goodwill acquired (including revisions) 497,593 Impairment (522,950) ----------- Net balance as of January 1, 2006 118,404 Goodwill acquired 141 Change in goodwill (881) ----------- Net balance as of April 2, 2006 $ 117,664 =========== 6. Store Closure, Merger and Restructuring Reserves During the fourth quarter of fiscal year ended January 1, 2006, we notified 101 Movie Gallery associates that their positions will be relocated or eliminated as part of our integration plan to consolidate Finance, Accounting, Treasury, Product, Logistics, Human Resources and Payroll functions at our Wilsonville, Oregon support center. The affected individuals are required to render service for a range of 10 to 49 weeks in order to receive termination benefits. We currently estimate that the total cost of providing severance, retention incentives and outplacement services to these associates will be approximately $2.7 million, of which approximately $1.2 million and $0.9 million was recognized during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively, with the remainder to be expensed over the remaining retention service period for the impacted associates in 2006 in accordance with SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Disposal and Exit Activities." There were cash payments charged to the reserve of $0.2 million during the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we decided to close 64 Movie Gallery stores that overlapped trade areas served by competing Hollywood stores. We recorded store closure costs of $9.6 million related to these store closures, which included $1.8 million in non-cash write-offs of store fixtures and equipment and $7.6 million of reserves for operating lease obligations payable through the end of the lease terms, net of probable sublease income, and $0.3 million for other cash costs associated with these store closures, all of which were closed in the fourth quarter. Cash payments charged to the reserve were $1.6 million during the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006. The remaining reserves for future lease payments are expected to be paid in fiscal 2006 through 2012. We established merger reserves, which were treated as liabilities of the acquired business at the date of acquisition, relating to executives and other employees that were terminated shortly after the merger, including some that were terminated as part of our integration efforts, in accordance with EITF 95- 3, "Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination." During the second quarter of 2005, we notified 92 Hollywood employees of the decision to eliminate their positions in connection with these integration efforts. We recorded a $6.6 million reserve for costs associated with severance and benefits for the impacted individuals. Payments to these individuals will be made over the severance period in accordance with the our severance agreements. Total payments of $2.5 million and $0.8 million were made for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively, leaving a $3.3 million reserve as of April 2, 2006. Movie Hollywood Gallery Video Total ---------- --------- --------- Store closure reserve: Balance as of January 1, 2006 $ 10,112 $ 3,613 $ 13,725 Additions and adjustments (1,339) - (1,339) Payments (1,605) (166) (1,771) ---------- ---------- -------- Balance as of April 2, 2006 $ 7,168 $ 3,447 $ 10,615 ========== ========= ======== Termination benefits: Balance as of January 1, 2006 $ 1,190 $ 4,116 $ 5,306 Additions and adjustments 809 - 809 Payments (178) (769) (947) ---------- --------- -------- Balance as of April 2, 2006 $ 1,821 $ 3,347 $ 5,168 ========== ========= ======== Estimated future additions and adjustments $ 701 $ - $ 701 Total termination benefits cost $ 2,700 $ 6,655 $ 9,355 7. Long-Term Debt Long term debt consists of the following (in thousands): January 1, April 2, Instrument 2006 2006 - ----------------------------------- ------------------------- Movie Gallery senior notes $ 321,489 $ 321,628 Credit Facility: Term A Loan 85,500 79,650 Term B Loan 746,250 693,318 Revolving credit facility 6,862 - Hollywood senior notes 450 450 Capital leases 678 460 ----------- ---------- Total 1,161,229 1,095,506 Less current portion (78,146) (773,380) ----------- ---------- $1,083,083 $ 322,126 =========== ========== On March 15, 2006, we executed a second amendment to our Credit Facility effective through the fourth quarter 2006. We accounted for the second amendment as a modification pursuant to EITF No. 96-19, "Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments", and accordingly have continued to defer $19.0 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the Credit Agreement. We incurred fees related to the second amendment totaling $5.5 million, which have been deferred in accordance with EITF 96-19 and will be amortized over the remaining term of the Credit Agreement. The second amendment made various changes to the Credit Facility which included: - - A requirement for us to provide monthly financial reporting and cash flow forecasts to the bank group. - - More restrictive operating covenants regarding our ability to incur indebtedness, pay dividends, redeem our capital stock, make capital expenditures, make acquisitions, and other covenants. Also, certain mandatory prepayment provisions have been modified. - - New pricing for the interest rates on the Term Loans and Revolver. For the period starting April 1, 2006, through the submission of the first quarter 2006 covenant package to the administrative agent, the interest rate for the Term Loan A and Revolver will be set at LIBOR plus 5.00%. After submission of the covenant package, the pricing is as follows: Leverage Ratio LIBOR Margin > 4.00 5.00% 3.25 - 4.00 3.50% 2.75 - 3.25 2.75% 2.25 - 2.75 2.50% 1.75 - 2.25 2.25% < 1.75 2.00% The Term Loan B pricing was revised to reflect a rate of LIBOR plus 5.25% starting April 1, 2006 through the submission of the first quarter covenant package. After submission of the covenant package, the interest rate will be LIBOR plus 5.25% if our leverage ratio exceeds 4.00; otherwise the rate will be LIBOR plus 3.75%. When the leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 4.00, at our discretion, we can elect to defer payment of 0.50% of the Term Loan A, Term Loan B and Revolver interest as non-cash interest, which will be capitalized into the loans (with compounding interest). - - The second amendment provides relief through the fourth quarter of 2006 related to our compliance with the quarterly leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, and interest coverage tests. The quarterly financial covenants revert to the original covenants commencing with the first quarter of 2007. The covenant levels contained in the second amendment are as follows: Leverage Fixed Charge Interest Coverage Ratio Coverage Ratio Ratio 2006 Q1 5.00 1.05 2.00 2006 Q2 5.75 1.05 1.75 2006 Q3 6.75 1.00 1.45 2006 Q4 6.50 1.00 1.45 2007 Q1 2.25 1.10 3.00 2007 Q2 2.25 1.10 3.00 2007 Q3 2.25 1.10 3.00 2007 Q1 2.00 1.10 3.00 As of April 2, 2006, we were in compliance with our Credit Facility financial covenants as a result of the debt covenant relief we obtained in the second amendment. However, while we anticipate complying with the financial covenants contained in the Credit Facility, as amended, at each test date through the remainder of fiscal 2006, based on projected operating results it is probable that we could fail the more restrictive financial covenant tests effective as of April 1, 2007. As a result, in accordance with EITF 86-30, "Classification of Obligations When a Violation is Waived by a Creditor", all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility have been classified as current liabilities as of April 2, 2006. Assuming continued compliance with the applicable debt covenants under the Credit Facility, as amended, we expect cash on hand, cash from operations, cash from non-core asset sales, and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility to be sufficient to fund the anticipated cash requirements for working capital purposes and capital expenditures under our normal operations, including any additional spending on our initiatives, as well as commitments and payments of principal and interest on borrowings for the remainder of 2006. If amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility were called by the lenders due to a covenant violation, amounts under other agreements, such as the indenture governing our Senior Notes and certain leases, could also become due and payable immediately. Should the outstanding obligation under the Credit Facility be accelerated and become due and payable because of our failure to comply with applicable debt covenants in the future, we would be required to search for alternative measures to finance current and ongoing obligations of our business. There can be no assurance that such financing would be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Our ability to obtain future financing or to sell assets to provide additional funding could be adversely affected because a large majority of our assets have been secured as collateral under the Credit Facility. In addition, our financial results, our substantial indebtedness, and our reduced credit ratings could adversely affect the availability and terms of financing for us. Further, uncertainty surrounding our ability to finance our obligations has caused some of our trade creditors to impose increasingly less favorable terms and continuing uncertainty and could result in even more unfavorable terms from our trade creditors. Any of these scenarios could adversely impact our liquidity and results of operations. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events and circumstances beyond management's control. If we breach any of these covenants, one or more events of default, including cross-defaults between multiple components of our indebtedness, could result. These events of default could permit creditors to declare all amounts owing to be immediately due and payable, and to terminate any commitments to make further extensions of credit. If we were unable to repay our debt service obligations under the Credit Facility or the Senior Notes our secured creditors could proceed against the collateral securing the indebtedness owed to them. 8. Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands): April 3, April 2, 2005 2006 ---------- ---------- Net income $ 18,393 $ 40,347 Foreign currency translation adjustment (394) (88) Change in value of interest rate swap - 1,002 --------- --------- Comprehensive income $ 17,999 $ 41,261 ========= ========= 9. Commitments and Contingencies Hollywood and the members of its former board of directors (including Hollywood's former chairman Mark Wattles) were named as defendants in several lawsuits in the Circuit Court in Clackamas County, Oregon. The lawsuits, filed between March 31, 2004 and April 14, 2004, asserted breaches of duties associated with the merger agreement executed by Hollywood with a subsidiary of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. or LPG. The Clackamas County actions were later consolidated and the plaintiffs filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint alleging four claims for relief against Hollywood's former board members arising out of the merger of Hollywood with Movie Gallery. The purported four claims for relief are breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of confidential information, failure to disclose material information in the proxy statement in support of the Movie Gallery merger, and a claim for attorneys' fees and costs. The Amended Consolidated Complaint also names UBS Warburg and LGP as defendants. Following the merger with Movie Gallery, the plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint. The plaintiffs restated their causes of action and generally allege that the defendants adversely impacted the value of Hollywood through the negotiations and dealings with LGP. Hollywood and the former members of its board have also been named as defendants in a separate lawsuit entitled JDL Partners, L.P. v. Mark J. Wattles et al. filed in Clackamas County, Oregon, Circuit Court on December 22, 2004. This lawsuit, filed before Hollywood's announcement of the merger agreement with Movie Gallery, alleges breaches of fiduciary duties related to a bid by Blockbuster Inc. to acquire Hollywood, as well as breaches related to a loan to Mr. Wattles that Hollywood forgave in December 2000. On April 25, 2005, the JDL Partners action was consolidated with the other Clackamas County lawsuits. The plaintiffs seek damages and attorneys' fees and costs. Hollywood denies these allegations and is vigorously defending this lawsuit. Hollywood was named as a defendant in a sexual harassment lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Bronx County on April 17, 2003. The action, filed by eleven former female employees, alleges that an employee, in the course of his employment as a store director for Hollywood, sexually harassed and assaulted certain of the plaintiffs, and that Hollywood and its members of management failed to prevent or respond adequately to the employee's alleged wrongdoing. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, pre-judgment interest and attorneys' fees and costs. Hollywood denies these allegations and is vigorously defending this lawsuit. In addition, we have been named to various other claims, disputes, legal actions and other proceedings involving contracts, employment and various other matters. A negative outcome in certain of the ongoing litigation could harm our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. In addition, prolonged litigation, regardless of which party prevails, could be costly, divert management attention or result in increased costs of doing business. We believe we have provided adequate reserves for contingencies and that the outcome of these matters should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operation, financial condition or liquidity. At April 2, 2006, the legal contingencies reserve, net of expected recoveries from insurance carriers, was $3.0 million of which $2.3 million relates to pre- acquisition contingencies. The recorded reserves for some matters may require adjustment in future periods and those adjustments could be material. Under SFAS No. 141 "Business Combinations," some or all of any future revisions to the recorded reserves for pre-acquisition contingencies may be required to be treated as revisions to the preliminary purchase price allocation (described in Note 2) which generally would be recorded as adjustments to goodwill. Adjustments related to pre-acquisition contingencies made after the anniversary date of the acquisition will be recognized in the income statement in the period when such revisions are made. All other adjustments related to matters existing as of the date of acquisition of Hollywood will be recognized in the income statement in the period when such revisions are made. Boards, Inc. By letter dated August 29, 2005, Boards, an entity controlled by Mark Wattles, the founder and former Chief Executive Officer of Hollywood, exercised a contractual right to require Hollywood to purchase all of the 20 Hollywood Video stores and 17 Game Crazy stores owned and operated by Boards pursuant to a "put" option contained in the license agreement for these stores. In accordance with the terms of the license agreement, Hollywood and Boards have agreed to the retention of a valuation expert and are proceeding with the valuation of the stores. We anticipate that the transaction will close in fiscal 2006. 10. Segment Reporting As of April 27, 2005, management began evaluating the operating results of the Company based on three segments, Movie Gallery, Hollywood Video, and Game Crazy. The segments are based on store branding. Movie Gallery represents 2,700 video stores serving mainly rural markets in the U.S, Canada, and Mexico, Hollywood Video represents 2,056 video stores serving predominantly urban markets, and Game Crazy represents 649 in-store departments and 17 free- standing stores serving the game market in urban locations. We measure segment profit as operating income (loss), which is defined as income (loss) before interest, and other financing costs, equity in losses of unconsolidated entities and income taxes. Information on our reportable operating segments is as follows (in thousands): Thirteen Weeks Ended April 2, 2006 ------------------------------------------- Movie Hollywood Game Gallery Video Crazy Total ---------- --------- -------- ---------- Revenues $ 244,394 $ 377,415 $ 72,556 $ 694,365 Depreciation and amortization 9,395 14,546 2,777 26,718 Rental amortization 28,787 36,585 - 65,372 Operating income(loss) 15,364 53,706 (1,562) 67,508 Goodwill, net 141 117,523 - 117,664 Total assets 391,975 755,638 100,591 1,248,204 Purchases of property, furnishings and equipment 6,819 2,090 74 8,983 For the comparable period ended April 2, 2005, there was only one reportable segment, which was Movie Gallery. Prior year consolidated results are the Movie Gallery segment totals for those periods. 11. Subsequent Events On April 7, 2006, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer resigned for personal reasons. Our Senior Vice President and Treasurer has been appointed interim Chief Financial Officer. In addition to these changes, several other management and administrative positions were consolidated or eliminated. We will record severance costs totaling $2.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 related to the consolidation of these positions. On April 17, 2006, we entered into a management agreement with Hilco Real Estate, LLC under which we and Hilco will initiate a program to restructure leases at more than 1,000 existing Movie Gallery and Hollywood video stores. 12. Consolidating Financial Statements The following tables present condensed consolidating financial information for: (a) Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Parent") on a stand-alone basis; (b) on a combined basis, the guarantors of the 11% Senior Notes ("Subsidiary Guarantors"), which include Movie Gallery US, LLC.; Hollywood Entertainment Corporation; M.G.A. Realty I, LLC; M.G. Digital, LLC; and (c) on a combined basis, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, which include Movie Gallery Canada, Inc., Movie Gallery Mexico, Inc., S. de R.L. de C.V., and MG Automation, Inc. Each of the Subsidiary Guarantors is wholly-owned by Movie Gallery, Inc. The guarantees issued by each of the Subsidiary Guarantors are full, unconditional, joint and several. Accordingly, separate financial statements of the wholly- owned Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the Subsidiary Guarantors are jointly, severally and unconditionally liable under the guarantees, and we believe separate financial statements and other disclosures regarding the Subsidiary Guarantors are not material to investors. Furthermore, there are no significant legal restrictions on the Parent's ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan. The Parent is a Delaware holding company and has no independent operations other than investments in subsidiaries and affiliates. Consolidating Statement of Operations Thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 (unaudited, in thousands) -------------------------------------------------- Non- Guarantor Guarantor Subsid- Subsid- Elimin- Consol- Parent iaries iaries ations idated --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Revenue: Rentals $ - $ 200,499 $ 16,242 $ - $ 216,741 Product sales - 15,601 1,449 - 17,050 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total revenue - 216,100 17,691 - 233,791 Cost of sales: Cost of rental revenue - 61,315 5,045 - 66,360 Cost of product sales - 11,231 959 - 12,190 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Gross profit - 143,554 11,687 - 155,241 Operating costs and expenses: Store operating expenses - 99,856 8,623 - 108,479 General and administrative 59 14,244 1,289 - 15,592 Amortization of intangibles - 559 41 - 600 -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Operating income(loss) (59) 28,895 1,734 - 30,570 Interest expense, net - (107) 27 - (80) Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities (337) - - - (337) Equity in earnings of subsidiaries 18,651 1,038 - (19,689) - -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Income before income taxes 18,255 29,826 1,761 (19,689) 30,153 Income taxes (benefit) (138) 11,175 723 - 11,760 -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Net income $ 18,393 $ 18,651 $ 1,038 $(19,689) $ 18,393 ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= Consolidating Statement of Operations Thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 (unaudited, in thousands) -------------------------------------------------- Non- Guarantor Guarantor Subsid- Subsid- Elimin- Consol- Parent iaries iaries ations idated --------- --------- --------- --------- -------- Revenue: Rentals $ - $ 547,597 $ 22,830 $ - $ 570,427 Product sales - 121,115 2,823 - 123,938 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total revenue - 668,712 25,653 - 694,365 Cost of sales: Cost of rental revenue - 164,863 8,714 - 173,577 Cost of product sales - 91,233 2,646 - 93,879 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Gross profit - 412,616 14,293 - 426,909 Operating costs and expenses: Store operating expenses - 301,010 13,069 - 314,079 General and administrative 2,791 40,595 1,203 - 44,589 Amortization of intangibles - 697 36 - 733 -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Operating income(loss) (2,791) 70,314 (15) - 67,508 Interest expense, net (19,826) (7,547) (81) - (27,454) Equity in earnings of subsidiaries 62,935 (70) - (62,865) - -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Income before income taxes 40,318 62,697 (96) (62,865) 40,054 Income taxes (29) (238) (26) - (293) -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Net income $ 40,347 $ 62,935 $ (70) $(62,865) $ 40,347 ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet January 1, 2006 (in thousands) -------------------------------------------------- Non- Guarantor Guarantor Subsid- Subsid- Elimin- Consol- Parent iaries iaries ations idated --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ - $ 133,901 $ 1,337 $ - $ 135,238 Merchandise inventory, net - 132,757 3,693 - 136,450 Prepaid expenses 19 39,495 1,879 - 41,393 Store supplies and other - 22,177 2,017 - 24,194 --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- Total current assets 19 328,330 8,926 - 337,275 Rental inventory, net - 354,091 17,474 - 371,565 Property, furnishings and equipment, net - 315,604 16,614 - 332,218 Goodwill, net - 118,404 - - 118,404 Other intangibles, net - 184,271 400 - 184,671 Deposits and other assets 32,292 8,127 576 - 40,995 Investments in subsidiaries 902,135 19,790 - (921,925) - --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- Total assets $ 934,446$1,328,617 $ 43,990 $(921,925)$1,385,128 ========= ========= ======== ========= ========= Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit): Current liabilities: Current maturities of long-term obligations $ 77,557 $ 533 $ 56 $ - $ 78,146 Current maturities of financing obligations - 4,492 - - 4,492 Accounts payable - 230,436 6,553 - 236,989 Accrued liabilities (13,378) 99,608 2,230 - 88,460 Accrued payroll 386 37,164 1,074 - 38,624 Accrued interest 7,130 58 32 - 7,220 Deferred revenue - 38,709 491 - 39,200 --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- Total current liabilities 71,695 411,000 10,436 - 493,131 Long-term obligations, less current portion 1,075,682 538 6,863 - 1,083,083 Other accrued liabilities - 20,209 1,453 - 21,662 Deferred income taxes - (345) 415 - 70 Intercompany promissory note (receivable) (384,200) 384,200 - - - Payable to (receivable from) affiliate 384,087 (389,120) 5,033 - - Stockholders' equity (deficit) (212,818) 902,135 19,790 (921,925) (212,818) --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 934,446$1,328,617 $ 43,990 $(921,925)$1,385,128 ========= ========= ======== ========= ========= Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet April 2, 2006 (unaudited, in thousands) -------------------------------------------------- Non- Guarantor Guarantor Subsid- Subsid- Elimin- Consol- Parent iaries iaries ations idated --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ - $ 31,748 $ 2,720 $ - $ 34,468 Merchandise inventory,net - 124,011 3,038 - 127,049 Prepaid expenses 5 43,669 1,869 - 45,543 Store supplies and other - 23,785 1,907 - 25,692 Deferred income taxes, net - - - - - --------- --------- -------- ------- --------- Total current assets 5 223,213 9,534 - 232,752 Rental inventory, net - 341,529 16,509 - 358,038 Property, furnishings and equipment, net - 294,415 16,194 - 310,609 Goodwill, net - 117,651 13 - 117,664 Other intangibles, net - 183,790 369 - 184,159 Deposits and other assets 37,428 6,948 606 - 44,982 Investments in subsidiaries 876,417 19,752 - (896,169) - --------- --------- -------- --------- ---------- Total assets $ 913,850 $1,187,298 $ 43,225 $(896,169) $1,248,204 ========= ========= ======= ======== ========== Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit): Current liabilities: Current maturities of long-term obligations 772,968 412 - - 773,380 Current maturities of financing obligations - 2,148 - - 2,148 Accounts payable - 128,842 4,134 - 132,976 Accrued liabilities (13,002) 92,547 2,646 - 82,191 Accrued payroll 225 34,501 690 35,416 Accrued interest 15,840 65 (14) - 15,891 Deferred revenue - 33,254 350 - 33,604 ---------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Total current liabilities 776,031 291,769 7,806 - 1,075,606 Long-term obligations,less current portion 321,627 497 2 - 322,126 Other accrued liabilities - 20,296 1,477 - 21,773 Deferred income taxes - (345) 415 - 70 Intercompany promissory note (receivable) (384,200) 384,200 - - - Payable to(receivable from) affiliate 371,763 (385,536) 13,773 - - Stockholders' equity (deficit) (171,371) 876,417 19,752 (896,169) (171,371) --------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $ 913,850 $1,187,298 $43,225 $(896,169) $1,248,204 ========= ========== ======== ========== ========== Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flow Thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 (unaudited, in thousands) ------------------------------------------------- Non- Guarantor Guarantor Subsid- Subsid- Elimin- Consol- Parent iaries iaries ations idated -------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Operating Activities: Net income $ 18,393 $ 18,651 $ 1,038 $ (19,689) $ 18,393 Equity earnings in subsidiaries (18,651) (1,038) - 19,689 - Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Rental inventory amortization - 17,747 2,682 - 20,429 Purchases of rental inventory - (18,471) (1,970) - (20,441) Purchases of rental inventory-base stock - (2,902) (356) - (3,258) Depreciation and intangibles amortization - 8,119 682 - 8,801 Stock based compensation (non Cash) 141 - - - 141 Tax benefit of stock options exercised 2,175 - - - 2,175 Deferred income taxes - 3,498 86 - 3,584 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions: Merchandise inventory - (555) (339) - (894) Other current assets (29) (5,778) (331) - (6,138) Deposits and other assets 75 (935) 105 - (755) Accounts payable - (12,697) (1,878) - (14,575) Accrued liabilities and deferred revenue (1,356) 3,225 721 - 2,590 -------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Net cash provided by operating activities 748 8,864 440 - 10,052 Investing Activities: Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired - (4,756) 102 - (4,654) Purchase of property, furnishings and equipment - (9,175) (1,437) - (10,612) Investment in subsidiaries (6,380) (90) - 6,470 - -------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Net cash used in investing activities (6,380) (14,021) (1,335) 6,470 (15,266) Financing Activities: Proceeds from exercise of stock options 3,475 - - - 3,475 Intercompany payable/ receivable - (377) 377 - - Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan 169 - - - 169 Capital contribution from parent - 6,380 90 (6,470) - Dividend to parent 2,933 (2,933) - - - Payment of dividends (945) - - - (945) -------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Net cash provided by financing activities 5,632 3,070 467 (6,470) 2,699 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents - (394) - - (394) -------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Decrease in cash and cash equivalents - (2,481) (428) - (2,909) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1 15,711 9,806 - 25,518 -------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 1 $ 13,230 $ 9,378 $ - $ 22,609 ======== ========= ======== ======== ========= Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flow Thirteen Weeks ended April 2, 2006 (unaudited, in thousands) -------------------------------------------------- Non- Guarantor Guarantor Subsid- Subsid- Elimin- Consol- Parent iaries iaries ations idated -------- --------- --------- -------- --------- Operating Activities: Net income (loss) $ 40,347 $ 62,935 $ (70) $(62,865) $ 40,347 Equity earnings in subsidiaries (62,935) 70 - 62,865 - Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Rental inventory amortization - 60,241 5,131 - 65,372 Purchases of rental inventory - (42,031) (3,912) - (45,943) Purchases of rental inventory base stock - (5,649) (254) - (5,903) Depreciation and intangibles amortization - 25,604 1,114 - 26,718 Stock based compensation 693 (273) - - 420 Amortization of debt issuance cost 1,532 - - - 1,532 Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions: Merchandise inventory - 8,809 656 - 9,465 Other current assets 14 (5,693) 121 - (5,558) Deposits and other assets - 977 (31) - 946 Accounts payable - (101,594) (2,418) - (104,012) Accrued interest 8,709 6 (46) - 8,669 Accrued liabilities and deferred revenue (120) (12,435) (81) - (12,636) --------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (11,760) (9,033) 210 - (20,583) Investing Activities: Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired - (223) (20) - (243) Purchase of property, furnishings and equipment - (8,323) (660) - (8,983) Proceeds from disposal of property, furnishings and equipment - 533 - - 533 Acquisition of construction phase assets, net (non cash) - 2,331 - - 2,331 Investment in subsidiaries 88,570 (30) - (88,540) - --------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in)investing activities 88,570 (5,712) (680) (88,540) (6,362) Financing Activities: Repayment of capital lease obligations - (163) - - (163) Intercompany payable/ receivable (12,498) 3,758 8,740 - - Decrease in financing obligations (non cash) - (2,345) - - (2,345) Net borrowings on credit facilities - - (6,862) - (6,862) Debt financing fees (5,528) - - - (5,528) Principal payments on debt (58,784) - (55) - (58,839) Capital contribution from parent - - 30 (30) - Dividend to parent - (88,570) - 88,570 - -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (76,810) (87,320) 1,853 88,540 (73,737) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents - (88) - - (88) -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents - (102,153) 1,383 - (100,770) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period - 133,901 1,337 - 135,238 -------- --------- -------- -------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ - $ 31,748 $ 2,720 $ - $ 34,468 ======== ========= ======== ======== ========= Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Overview On April 27, 2005, we completed our acquisition of Hollywood Entertainment Corporation, or Hollywood. This acquisition increased our total revenues to over $2.6 billion on a pro-forma annual basis with a store count of over 4,700 stores and substantially increased our urban market presence. We currently plan to maintain the Hollywood brand and store format and to open approximately 140 new Movie Gallery and Hollywood Video stores for the full year 2006 period, subject to market and industry conditions and the integration of Hollywood. Movie Gallery's eastern-focused rural and secondary market presence and Hollywood's western-focused prime urban and suburban superstore locations combine to form a strong nationwide geographical store footprint. We believe the most significant dynamic in our industry is the relationship our industry maintains with the movie studios. The studios have historically maintained an exclusive window for home video distribution (DVDs and video cassettes available for rental and sale), which provides the home video industry with an approximate 45 day period during which they can rent and sell new releases before they are made available on pay-per-view or other distribution channels. According to Kagan Research, the domestic home video industry accounted for approximately 51% of domestic studio movie revenue in 2005. For this reason, we believe movie studios have a significant interest in maintaining a viable home video business. Our strategies have been designed to maximize store revenues and profitability in a mature industry. We strive to minimize the operating and overhead costs associated with our business. We intend to apply these same disciplines to the Hollywood brand where appropriate. In addition to the relationship between our industry and the movie studios, our operating results are driven by revenue, inventory, rent and payroll. Given those key factors, we believe that by monitoring the five operating performance indicators described below, we can continue to be successful in executing our operating plans and our strategy. - - Revenues. Our business is a cash business with initial rental fees paid upfront by the customer. Our management teams continuously review inventory levels, marketing and sales promotions, real estate strategies, and staffing requirements in order to maximize revenues at each location. Additionally, our teams monitor revenue performance on a daily basis to quickly identify trends or issues in our store base or in the industry as a whole. Our management closely monitors same-store revenues, which we define as revenues at stores that we have operated for at least twelve full months, to assess the performance of our business. - - Product purchasing economics. In order to maintain the desired profit margin in our business, purchases of inventory for both rental and sale must be carefully managed. Our purchasing models are designed to analyze the impact of the economic factors inherent in the various pricing strategies employed by the studios. We believe that we are able to achieve purchasing levels tailored for the customer demographics of each of our markets and to maximize the return on investment of our inventory purchase dollars. - - Store level cost control. The most significant store expenses are payroll and rent, followed by facilities-related and supply expenditures. We attempt to control these expenses primarily through budgeting systems and centralization of purchases in our corporate support centers. This enables us to measure performance against expectations and to leverage our purchasing power. We are also able to adjust store hours and staffing levels to specific market conditions as well as leverage best practices from both Movie Gallery and Hollywood to reduce expense and increase operating efficiency. - - Leverage of overhead expenses. We apply the same principles of budgeting, accountability and conservatism in our overhead spending that we employ in managing our store operating costs. Our general and administrative expenses include the costs to maintain our corporate support centers as well as the overhead costs of our field management teams. Our integration strategy is focused on eliminating duplication, leveraging best practices and reaping the financial benefits of economies of scale to reduce costs. - - Operating cash flows. We have generated significant levels of cash flow from operations for several years. We have historically been able to fund the majority of our store growth and acquisitions, as well as ongoing inventory purchases, from cash flow generated from operations. An exception to this was the acquisition of Hollywood, which we funded through a combination of significant long-term debt and cash on-hand. There is a distinct seasonal pattern to the home video and game retail business. Compared to other months during the year, we typically experience peak revenues during the months of November, December and January due to the holidays in these months as well as inclement weather conditions. Additionally, revenues generally rise in the months of June, July and August when most schools are out of session, providing consumers with additional discretionary time to spend on entertainment. September is typically the lowest revenue period with schools back in session and the premiere of "new" fall broadcast television programs. The Game Crazy operating segment experiences more traditional retail revenue peaks, which are more significantly weighted towards holiday periods and when schools are out of session. On April 7, 2006, Timothy R. Price, Movie Gallery's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, resigned for personal reasons. Mark D. Moreland, Senior Vice President and Treasurer, was appointed Interim Chief Financial Officer in addition to his current responsibilities. In addition to these changes, several other management and administrative positions were consolidated or eliminated. We will record severance costs totaling $2.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 related to the consolidation of these positions. In addition, on April 17, 2006, we entered into a management agreement with Hilco Real Estate, LLC under which we and Hilco will initiate a program to restructure leases at more than 1,000 existing Movie Gallery and Hollywood Video stores. Hollywood Acquisition On April 27, 2005, we completed our cash acquisition of Hollywood, refinanced substantially all of the existing indebtedness of Hollywood, and replaced our existing unsecured revolving credit facility. We paid $862.1 million to purchase all of Hollywood's outstanding common stock and $384.7 million to refinance Hollywood's debt. As part of the refinancing of Hollywood's debt, Hollywood executed a tender offer for its $225.0 million principal amount 9.625% senior subordinated notes due 2011, pursuant to which $224.6 million were tendered. The Hollywood acquisition was financed using Hollywood's cash on-hand of approximately $180.0 million, a senior secured credit facility guaranteed by all of our domestic subsidiaries in an aggregate principal amount of $870.0 million, and an issuance of $325.0 million of 11% senior unsecured notes. The acquisition substantially increased our presence on the West Coast and in urban areas. Hollywood's predominantly West Coast urban superstore locations present little overlap with Movie Gallery's rural and suburban store locations concentrated in the eastern half of the United States. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we closed 64 Movie Gallery stores with trade areas that overlapped with acquired Hollywood Video stores. We will continue to evaluate the closure of stores with overlapping trade areas such as these as market conditions warrant. We will maintain the Hollywood store format and brand separately from our Movie Gallery business because of Hollywood's distinct operational model and to ensure customer continuity. There has been a conscious effort not to interrupt the field management organizations at Movie Gallery and Hollywood to ensure they remain focused on revenue and customer service. Integration efforts to date have primarily focused on consolidating the leadership functions in the brands. This is complete for the Human Resources, Real Estate, Legal, Lease Administration, Finance, Information Systems, Loss Prevention, Product, Merchandising, and Distribution functions. The respective leaders of these support organizations continue to evaluate opportunities to leverage both Movie Gallery's and Hollywood's best practices and generate general and administrative cost savings. To date, we have identified cost savings opportunities in both Movie Gallery's and Hollywood's cost structures, and we anticipate that we will identify additional opportunities in the future. The combined companies also are evaluating opportunities to reap the benefits of increased purchasing leverage to reduce costs. However, we can make no assurances that we will successfully integrate Hollywood's business with our business or that we will achieve any further cost savings. During the fourth quarter of 2005, we notified 101 Movie Gallery associates that their positions will be relocated or eliminated as part of our integration plan through the consolidation of Finance, Accounting, Treasury, Product, Logistics, Human Resources and Payroll functions at our Wilsonville, Oregon support center. The affected individuals are required to render service for a range of 10 to 49 weeks in order to receive termination benefits. We currently estimate that the total cost of providing severance, retention incentives and outplacement services to these associates will be approximately $2.7 million, of which approximately $1.2 million and $0.9 million were recognized during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively, with the remainder to be expensed over the remaining retention service period for the impacted associates in 2006 in accordance with SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Disposal and Exit Activities." There were cash payments charged to the reserve of $0.2 million during the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006. We estimate the integration-related efficiencies and savings achieved during fiscal 2005 to be in excess of $20 million. These savings have been driven principally by improvements in the supply chain for Movie Gallery branded stores, consolidation of our Real Estate and Architecture functions, inventory utilization, and elimination of duplicative executive management. We continue to identify and implement additional savings opportunities. We expect that total savings, including new projects in 2006 combined with the full year 2006 impact of the savings already achieved in 2005 will be in excess of $50 million. Other Acquisitions By letter dated August 29, 2005, Boards Inc., or Boards, an entity controlled by Mark Wattles, the founder and former Chief Executive Officer of Hollywood, exercised a contractual right to require Hollywood to purchase all of the 20 Hollywood Video stores and 17 Game Crazy stores owned and operated by Boards pursuant to a put option. The put option, and a related call option, were contained in the license agreement between Hollywood and Boards which was effective January 25, 2001. On a change of control (as defined in the license agreement), Hollywood had an option to purchase the stores within six months. Likewise, on a change of control, Boards had the option to require Hollywood to purchase the stores within six months. In both cases, the process by which the price would be determined was detailed in the license agreement and was at fair value as determined by an appraisal process. In accordance with the terms of the license agreement, Hollywood and Boards have agreed to the retention of a valuation expert and are proceeding with the valuation of the stores. It is anticipated that the transaction will close in 2006. The following discussion of our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources is intended to provide further insight into our performance for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 and April 2, 2006. Results of Operations The financial information provided in the Selected Financial Statement and Operational Data is not comparable on a year-over-year basis due to the acquisition of Hollywood, which occurred April 27, 2005. The results of operations for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 does not include Hollywood results, whereas the results of operations for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 includes Hollywood results. Selected Financial Statement and Operational Data: Thirteen Weeks Ended ----------------------- April 3, April 2, 2005 2006 --------- ---------- (unaudited) ($ in thousands, except per share and store data) Rental revenue $ 216,741 $ 570,427 Product sales 17,050 123,938 --------- ---------- Total revenue 233,791 694,365 Cost of rental revenue 66,360 173,577 Cost of product sales 12,190 93,879 --------- ---------- Total gross profit $ 155,241 $ 426,909 Store operating expenses $ 108,479 $ 314,079 General and administrative expenses $ 15,592 $ 44,589 Operating income $ 30,570 $ 67,508 Interest expense, net $ (80) $ (27,454) Equity in losses of unconsolidated entities $ (337) $ - Net income $ 18,393 $ 40,347 Net income per diluted share $ 0.58 $ 1.27 Cash dividends per common share $ 0.03 $ - Rental margin 69.4% 69.6% Product sales margin 28.5% 24.3% Total gross margin 66.4% 61.5% Percent of total revenue: Rental revenue 92.7% 82.2% Product sales 7.3% 17.8% Store operating expenses 46.4% 45.2% General and administrative expenses 6.7% 6.4% Operating income 13.1% 9.7% Interest expense, net 0.0% 4.0% Net income 7.9% 5.8% Total same-store revenues 1.5% (6.5%) Movie Gallery same-store revenues 1.5% (3.7%) Hollywood same-store revenues (1) 3.7% (7.7%) Total same-store rental revenues 2.5% (7.7%) Movie Gallery same-store revenues 2.5% (5.6%) Hollywood same-store revenues (1) 0.1% (8.8%) Total same-store product sales (9.3%) (0.8%) Movie Gallery same-store sales (9.3%) 18.2% Hollywood same-store sales (1) 19.4% (3.9%) Store count: Beginning of period 2,482 4,749 New store builds 62 70 Stores acquired 18 - Stores closed (19) (46) --------- ---------- End of period 2,543 4,773 ========= ========== (1) The information above reflects the historical store operating statistics previously reported by Hollywood Entertainment. Hollywood's store operating statistics for periods prior to April 27, 2005 are not otherwise included in the consolidated statements of operations. Hollywood same-store revenues are presented on a pro forma basis as if the merger had been completed at the beginning of fiscal 2005 and are inclusive of the Game Crazy operating segment. Revenue For the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, consolidated total revenues increased 197.0% from the comparable period in 2005, primarily due to the acquisition of Hollywood. Same-store total revenues were negative 6.5% for the first quarter of 2006, which consisted of a 7.7% decline in same-store rental revenue and a 0.8% decline in same-store product revenue. With the acquisition of Hollywood, our revenue has shifted more to product revenue and away from rental revenues versus the comparable period in fiscal 2005. The Game Crazy operating segment is the primary driver of this shift in revenue mix. We expect this trend to continue. For the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, the Movie Gallery operating segment total revenues increased 4.5% from the comparable period in 2005. The increase was due to an increase of approximately 7.2% in the average number of stores operated during the first quarter of 2006 compared to the first quarter of 2005. The increase was partially offset by a same-store total revenue decrease of 3.7% for the first quarter of 2006, which consisted of a 5.6% decline in same-store rental revenue and an 18.2% increase in same-store product sales revenue. The addition of Hollywood operating segment revenue for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 accounted for 97.7% of the total revenue increases. Hollywood total same-store revenues were negative 7.7% for the first quarter of 2006, which consisted of an 8.8% decline in same-store rental revenue and a 3.9% decline in same-store product sales revenue. The following factors contributed to a decrease in our total same-store revenues for both the Movie Gallery and Hollywood operating segments for the first quarter of 2006 versus the first quarter of 2005: - -Movie rental revenue, including previously viewed sales, declined and was adversely impacted by the soft home video release schedule, the maturation of the DVD life cycle, the overabundance of DVD titles available in the marketplace and alternative delivery channels. - -Game rental revenue declined, reflecting the weakness of the new game titles currently being released and the industry softness that occurs in anticipation of the introduction of new game platforms currently scheduled for release later in 2006. Cost of Sales The cost of rental revenues includes the amortization of rental inventory, revenue sharing expenses incurred and the cost of previously viewed rental inventory sold. The gross margin on rental revenue for the first quarter of 2006 was 69.6% versus 69.4% for the comparable quarter of 2005. A charge of $6.8 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, was recorded against rental margins in the first quarter of 2006 to reflect changes in rental amortization estimates. Factors contributing to the gross margin increase include an increase in the percentage of DVD movies acquired under revenue sharing arrangements and a decrease in the percentage of revenue from promotionally discounted previously viewed movies. Cost of product sales includes the costs of new video and used video game merchandise taken in on trade for the Game Crazy operating segment, new movies, concessions and other goods sold. New movies and new game merchandise typically have a much lower margin than used game merchandise and concessions. The gross margin on product sales is subject to fluctuations in the relative mix of the products that are sold. The gross margin on product sales for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 was 24.3% compared to 28.5% for the comparable quarter of 2005. The decrease in product sales margin was primarily caused by the higher penetration of new movies and new game merchandise sales. The acquisition of the Game Crazy operating segment acquired with Hollywood will continue to increase the percent to total revenue of new game merchandise sales for the first and second quarters of 2006. Operating Costs and Expenses Store operating expenses include store-level expenses such as lease payments, in-store payroll and start-up costs associated with new store openings. Store operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 46.4% and 45.2% for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 and April 2, 2006, respectively. The decrease was due to the acquisition of Hollywood and its lower operating costs and expenses as a percentage of revenue. General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 6.7% and 6.4% for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005, and thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively. The decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the acquisition of Hollywood and its lower general and administrative costs as a percentage of revenue. Stock Compensation Expense. In June 2003, our Board of Directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, the Movie Gallery, Inc. 2003 Stock Plan, which was subsequently amended in June 2005 (Second Amendment) to reserve an additional 3,500,000 shares of our common stock for future grants of awards. The plan provides for the award of stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights to employees, directors and consultants. Prior to adoption of the 2003 plan, stock option awards were subject to our 1994 Stock Plan which expired in 2004. As of April 2, 2006, 5,417,033 shares are reserved for issuance under the plans. Options granted under the plans have a ten-year term and generally vest over four years. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25") and followed the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" ("SFAS No. 123"), as amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure." Accordingly, compensation expense was not recognized in our consolidated statement of operations in connection with stock options that were granted under our stock-based compensation plan, except for the variable options as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006. Effective with our fiscal year beginning January 2, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123(R)"), which no longer permits use of the intrinsic value method under APB No. 25. We used the modified prospective method to adopt SFAS No. 123(R), which requires that compensation expense be recorded for all stock-based compensation granted on or after January 1, 2006, as well as the unvested portion of previously granted options. On December 2, 2005, our Board of Directors approved a resolution to vest all stock options outstanding as of December 2, 2005. The Board decided to fully vest these specific out-of-the-money options, as there was no perceived value in these options to the employee, there were few retention ramifications, and to minimize the expense to our consolidated financial statements upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). This acceleration of the original vesting schedules affected 716,000 unvested stock options. As a result, there is no compensation expense associated with stock options granted prior to January 2, 2006 in the consolidated statements of operations. No assumptions regarding the underlying value of these previously granted stock options were changed upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Under SFAS No. 123(R), the modified prospective method requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to vest. The fair value of non-vested share grants is based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of our common stock. No stock options were granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. However, we expect to use the Black-Scholes valuation model for future stock option grants in order to determine fair value. This is consistent with the valuation techniques that were previously utilized for options in footnote disclosures required under SFAS No. 123. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires significant estimates, and to the extent that actual results or updated estimates differ from current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period that estimates are revised. Actual results and future changes in estimates may differ substantially from the current estimates. Because we implemented SFAS No. 123(R), there are no longer any employee stock awards subject to variable accounting treatment. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) did not result in any changes in our assumptions regarding estimated future forfeitures; therefore, no cumulative adjustment from accounting change is included in our consolidated statement of operations. Valuation of awards of service-based non-vested shares were accounted for similarly under APB No. 25, SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 123(R), in that all three methods required the use of the grant date fair value as the basis for future expense recognition. Treatment of performance-based non-vested share awards, however, differs between APB No. 25 and SFAS No. 123(R). APB No. 25 required quarterly revaluation of outstanding shares granted based on the quoted market price of our stock, thus resulting in quarterly cumulative adjustments to the extent that prior periods' expense was restated to reflect the new underlying value of the non-vested shares. SFAS No. 123(R), however, values performance- based non-vested shares at the quoted market price of our stock as of the grant date, with no remeasurement. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), cash retained as the result of cash deductions relating to stock-based compensation was presented in operating cash flows, along with other tax cash flows, in accordance with the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 00-15, "Classification in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Income Tax benefit Received by a Company upon Exercise of a Nonqualified Employee Stock Option." SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes EITF 00-15, amends SFAS No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows", and requires tax benefits relating to excess stock-based compensation deductions to be prospectively presented in the statement of cash flows as financing cash inflows. There were no significant tax benefits resulting from stock-based compensation deductions in excess of amounts reported for financial reporting purposes for the first quarter of fiscal year of 2006. Service-based nonvested share awards vest over periods ranging from one to four years. Compensation expense, representing the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the date of issuance over the nominal purchase price of the shares, is charged to earnings over the vesting period. Compensation expense charged to operations related to these stock grants was $1.2 million and $0.3 million for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively. The total grant date fair value of service- based share awards vested during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 was $0 and $1.1 million, respectively. Performance-based nonvested share awards entitle participants to acquire shares of stock upon attainment of specified performance goals. Compensation cost of $0.4 million and $0.1 million for performance-based stock grants were recognized for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, respectively, using the accelerated expense attribution method under SFAS Interpretation No. 28 (EITF 00-23). The total grant date fair value of performance-based share awards vested during the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006 and the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 was $0 and $1.2 million, respectively. Total compensation cost related to all non-vested awards that is not yet recognized was $2.8 million at April 2, 2006, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years. Interest Expense, net. Net income for the first quarter of 2006 includes $27.5 million pre-tax, or $0.86 per diluted share, in interest expense, principally related to borrowings used to fund the acquisition of Hollywood. We expect to incur significant interest expense for the foreseeable future. Interest expense for the first quarter of 2005 amounted to $0.1 million, a substantial portion of which related to credit facility fees and expenses. Equity in Losses of Unconsolidated Entities. During the last half of 2003, we began to make investments in various alternative delivery vehicles (both retail and digital) for movie content. We do not anticipate that any of these alternatives will replace our base video rental business. As of January 1, 2006, we have completely written off our investments in these unconsolidated entities, either through recognizing our proportionate share of the investee losses under the equity method, by disposing of the related interests, or through write-offs for investments we deemed to be worthless. Although we have no present intentions to do so, in the future we may make, subject to covenant limitations, similar investments that we will be required to account for as equity investments similar to the investments we have made in the past. The write-offs of our share of investee losses were higher for the first quarter of 2005, as the remaining balances were written off in 2005. Income Taxes. The effective tax rate was a provision of 39.0% and a benefit of 0.7% for the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005 and April 2, 2006, respectively. The projected annual effective tax rate is a provision of 3.8% which differs from the benefit of 0.7% for the quarter ended April 2, 2006, due to unique items the Company recognized during the quarter, including a tax benefit related to a decrease in the valuation allowance and a change in estimate of state taxes payable for the year ended January 1, 2006. The decrease in the annual effective rate is primarily a result of changes in previously established valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets. Because of the existence of the valuation allowance, we generally expect that our federal income tax provision will be very low or negligible until such time as the valuation allowance is depleted through future taxable income or we determine it is no longer necessary. Likewise, we do not currently expect that we will be able to recognize any significant federal income tax benefits on future net operating losses because those benefits would most likely cause us to increase the valuation allowance by a corresponding amount in the foreseeable future. Liquidity and Capital Resources Our primary capital needs are for seasonal working capital, debt service, new store investment, and remodeling and relocating existing stores. We fund our capital needs primarily by cash flow from operations and, as necessary, loans under our senior secured credit facility (the "Credit Facility"). The Credit Facility, which we entered into in connection with the acquisition of Hollywood and the refinancing of Hollywood's existing indebtedness, is in an aggregate amount of $848.0 million, consisting of a five-year $75.0 million revolving credit facility (the "Revolver") and two term loan facilities in an aggregate principal amount of $773.0 million as of April 2, 2006. Term Loan A is a $79.7 million five-year facility that matures on April 27, 2010 and Term Loan B is a $693.3 million six-year facility that matures on April 27, 2011. Also in connection with the Hollywood acquisition and refinancing, we issued $325.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11% senior unsecured notes due 2012 (the "Senior Notes"). At April 2, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of $34.5 million, $48.8 million in available borrowings under our Credit Facility, and $26.2 million drawn under the Revolver, comprised entirely of letters of credit. Although there can be no assurances, we believe that cash flow available from operations, availability under the $75.0 million Revolver, and sales of non- core assets will be sufficient to operate our business, satisfy our working capital and capital expenditure requirements, and meet our foreseeable liquidity requirements, including debt service for fiscal 2006. Our ability to fund our current plan of operations will depend upon our future performance, which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, industry and other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to fund capital resource needs, cover the ongoing costs of operating the business, remain in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the Credit Facility, or service our current level of indebtedness or any debt we may incur in the future. If we are unable to satisfy these requirements with our available cash resources, we may be required to sell assets or to obtain additional financing. There are no assurances that we can complete these sales or obtain financing on reasonable terms. Term Loan A and Term Loan B require aggregate quarterly prepayments of principal in the amounts of 5.0% and 0.25%, respectively, of the outstanding balances beginning September 30, 2005 through the first quarter of 2010, after which the mandatory Term Loan B prepayments escalate. In addition to these prepayments, the Credit Facility also requires us to make prepayments in an amount equal to 100% of any Excess Cash Flow, which generally represents the amount of cash generated by the Company but not used towards operations, debt service, or investments. The Excess Cash Flow payment for fiscal 2005 was $56.9 million, paid on March 31, 2006, applied to repay $5.8 million Term Loan A indebtedness and $51.1 million Term Loan B indebtedness. On March 15, 2006, we executed a second amendment to the Credit Facility, effective through the fourth quarter of 2006, that relaxed the financial covenants, restricted our ability to fund capital expenditures, perform asset sales, and use equity proceeds, and increased interest rates. We accounted for the second amendment as a modification pursuant to EITF No. 96-19, "Debtor's Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments", and accordingly have continued to defer $19.0 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the Credit Facility. We incurred significant fees related to the second amendment totaling $5.5 million, which have been deferred in accordance with EITF 96-19 and will be amortized over the remaining term of the Credit Agreement. The second amendment made various changes to the Credit Facility which included: - - A requirement for us to provide monthly financial reporting and cash flow forecasts to the bank group. - - More restrictive operating covenants regarding our ability to incur indebtedness, pay dividends, redeem our capital stock, make capital expenditures, make acquisitions, and other covenants. Also, certain mandatory prepayment provisions have been modified. - - New pricing for the interest rates on the Term Loans and Revolver. For the period starting April 1, 2006, through the submission of the first quarter 2006 covenant package to the administrative agent, the interest rate for the Term Loan A and Revolver will be set at LIBOR plus 5.00%. After submission of the covenant package, the pricing is as follows: Leverage Ratio LIBOR Margin > 4.00 5.00% 3.25 - 4.00 3.50% 2.75 - 3.25 2.75% 2.25 - 2.75 2.50% 1.75 - 2.25 2.25% < 1.75 2.00% The Term Loan B pricing was revised to reflect a rate of LIBOR plus 5.25% starting April 1, 2006 through the submission of the first quarter covenant package. After submission of the covenant package, the interest rate will be LIBOR plus 5.25% if our leverage ratio exceeds 4.00; otherwise the rate will be LIBOR plus 3.75%. When the leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 4.00, at our discretion, we can elect to defer payment of 0.50% of the Term Loan A, Term Loan B and Revolver interest as non-cash interest, which will be capitalized into the loans (with compounding interest). - - The second amendment provides relief through the fourth quarter of 2006 related to our compliance with the quarterly leverage ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio, and interest coverage tests. The quarterly financial covenants revert to the original covenants commencing with the first quarter of 2007. Each of these covenants is calculated on trailing four quarter results based on specific definitions that are contained in the credit agreement. In general terms, the leverage ratio is a measurement of total net indebtedness relative to operating cash flow. The fixed charge coverage ratio is a measurement of operating cash flow plus rent, less capital expenditures relative to total fixed charges including rent, scheduled principal payments, and cash interest. The interest coverage ratio is a measurement of operating cash flow relative to cash interest expense. The covenant levels contained in the Credit Facility, as amended, are as follows: Leverage Fixed Charge Interest Coverage Ratio Coverage Ratio Ratio 2006 Q1 5.00 1.05 2.00 2006 Q2 5.75 1.05 1.75 2006 Q3 6.75 1.00 1.45 2006 Q4 6.50 1.00 1.45 2007 Q1 2.25 1.10 3.00 2007 Q2 2.25 1.10 3.00 2007 Q3 2.25 1.10 3.00 2007 Q1 2.00 1.10 3.00 The Credit Facility and indenture governing our 11% Senior Notes impose certain restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to: incur debt; grant liens; provide guarantees in respect of obligations of any other person; pay dividends; make loans and investments; sell our assets; make redemptions and repurchases of capital stock; make capital expenditures; prepay, redeem or repurchase debt; engage in mergers or consolidations; engage in sale/leaseback transactions and affiliate transactions; change our business; amend certain debt and other material agreements; issue and sell capital stock of subsidiaries; and make distributions from subsidiaries. As of April 2, 2006, we were in compliance with our Credit Facility financial covenants as a result of the debt covenant relief we obtained in the second amendment. However, while we anticipate complying with the financial covenants contained in the Credit Facility, as amended, at each test date through the remainder of fiscal 2006, based on projected operating results it is probable that we could fail the more restrictive financial covenant tests effective as of April 1, 2007. As a result, in accordance with EITF 86-30, "Classification of Obligations When a Violation is Waived by a Creditor", all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility have been classified as current liabilities as of April 2, 2006. Assuming continued compliance with the applicable debt covenants under the Credit Facility, as amended, we expect cash on hand, cash from operations, cash from non-core asset sales, and available borrowings under the Revolver to be sufficient to fund the anticipated cash requirements for working capital purposes and capital expenditures under our normal operations, including any additional spending on our initiatives, as well as commitments and payments of principal and interest on borrowings for the remainder of 2006. If amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility were called by the lenders due to a covenant violation, amounts under other agreements, such as the indenture governing our Senior Notes and certain leases, could also become due and payable immediately. Should the outstanding obligation under the Credit Facility be accelerated and become due and payable because of our failure to comply with applicable debt covenants in the future, we would be required to search for alternative measures to finance current and ongoing obligations of our business. There can be no assurance that such financing would be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Our ability to obtain future financing or to sell assets to provide additional funding could be adversely affected because a large majority of our assets have been secured as collateral under the Credit Facility. In addition, our financial results, our substantial indebtedness, and our reduced credit ratings could adversely affect the availability and terms of financing for us. Further, uncertainty surrounding our ability to finance our obligations has caused some of our trade creditors to impose increasingly less favorable terms and continuing uncertainty and could result in even more unfavorable terms from our trade creditors. Any of these scenarios could adversely impact our liquidity and results of operations. We are exploring several alternative strategies to remain in compliance with the terms of our Credit Facility, including, among other things, operational improvement through capitalizing on merger integration synergy opportunities, raising additional equity, divesting certain non-core assets, sale/leaseback transactions, and subleasing and restructuring leases at our stores. We cannot assure you that any of these actions will be successful, or that any sales of assets, additional debt or equity financings or further debt amendments can be obtained. Our ability to comply with covenants contained in the instruments governing our existing and future indebtedness may be affected by events and circumstances beyond our control. If we breach any of these covenants, one or more events of default, including cross-defaults between multiple components of our indebtedness, could result. These events of default could permit our creditors to declare all amounts owing to be immediately due and payable and to terminate any commitments to make further extensions of credit. If we are unable to repay our debt service obligations under the Credit Facility or the Senior Notes, our secured creditors could proceed against the collateral securing the indebtedness owed to them. The Credit Facility is fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by our domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Facility is secured by first priority security interests in, and liens on, substantially all of our and our direct and indirect subsidiaries' tangible and intangible assets (other than leasehold mortgages on stores) and first priority pledges of all the equity interests owned by us in our existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and 66 2 / 3 % of the equity interests owned by us in our existing and future wholly-owned non-domestic subsidiaries. Contractual Obligations. The following table discloses our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of April 2, 2006. The operating lease information presented is as of January 1, 2006; however, these amounts approximate the obligations as of April 2, 2006 (in thousands): Contractual 2-3 4-5 More than Obligations Total 1 Year Years Years 5 Years - --------------- ---------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- Principal Payments Credit Facility Term Loan A (1) $ 79,650 $ 79,650 $ - $ - $ - Term Loan B (1) 693,318 693,318 - - - Revolver - - - - - Excess Cash Flow Sweep (2) Term A - - - - - Term B - - - - - Senior Notes 325,450 - - - 325,450 Capital leases 460 412 48 - - Interest Term Loan A (3) 7,320 7,320 - - - Term Loan B (3) 70,639 70,639 - - - Hedge agreement (2,576) (2,576) - - - Senior Notes 217,743 35,793 71,587 71,587 38,776 Capital leases 13 12 1 - - Operating leases 1,612,492 367,033 578,443 356,577 310,439 ---------- ---------- -------- --------- ---------- Total $3,004,509 $1,251,601 $650,079 $ 428,164 $ 674,665 ---------- ---------- -------- --------- ---------- (1) As of April 2, 2006, we were in compliance with the applicable financial covenant tests as a result of the debt covenant relief obtained in the second amendment to the Credit Facility. However, while we anticipate complying with the financial covenants at each test date through the remainder of fiscal 2006, based on projected operating results, it is probable that we could fail the more restrictive financial covenant tests effective as of April 1, 2007. As a result, in accordance with EITF 86-30, "Classification of Obligations When a Violation is Waived by a Creditor," all amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement as of April 2, 2006 have been classified as current liabilities. (2) Future prepayments of indebtedness under the amended Credit Facility will be required in an amount equal to our Excess Cash Flow, as defined in the Credit Facility. The amount of these prepayments cannot be estimated at this time. (3)Interest rates based on current LIBOR rates plus margin. As of April 2, 2006, the Term Loan A and Term Loan B rates are 9.98% and 10.23%, respectively. We have assumed these interest rates will stay the same for the remaining terms of the loans for purposes of presenting future interest payments. Actual amounts will differ from these estimates, and the difference based on interest rate changes and our leverage coverage ratio may be material. Thirteen Weeks Ended ------------------------ April 3, April 2, 2005 2006 ---------- ---------- ($ in thousands) Statements of Cash Flow Data: Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 10,052 $ (20,583) Net cash (used in) investing activities (15,266) (6,362) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 2,699 (73,737) Net income increased by $22.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 over the same period in fiscal 2005 primarily due to the inclusion of Hollywood operating results. Significant non-cash operating activity changes primarily driven by Hollywood include a $17.9 million increase in depreciation expense, a $44.9 million change in rental amortization and a $25.5 million change in rental purchases. These changes include a $6.8 million charge related to a change in accounting estimates of amortization and an $11.9 million reduction in rental purchases during the quarter. During the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, we used $104.0 million of cash toward payment of our accounts payable balances. This was driven by seasonal pay down of accounts payable, lower first quarter of 2006 inventory purchases, credit restrictions on the part of certain vendors and inclusion of Hollywood operating results. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities during the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 compared to the same period in fiscal 2005 is primarily due to lower purchases of property, furnishings, and equipment and limited business acquisitions. During the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2005, we purchased 18 stores in separate transactions totaling $4.7 million. While we did not acquire any stores during the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006, we did acquire $0.2 million in inventory from a competitive store location. In addition, we opened 70 internally developed stores and closed 46 stores during the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 compared to opening 62 internally developed stores and closing 19 stores during the thirteen weeks ended April 3, 2005. We expect the majority of our planned fiscal 2006 new stores will be internally developed. Capital requirements to fund our projected new store growth of 140 stores for fiscal 2006 are estimated at $16 million. Additionally in fiscal year 2006, we estimate $19 million in other on-going capital expenditure requirements for the existing store base. These estimates do not include capital required to fund our acquisition of the Boards stores pursuant to a contractual put provision. The Boards stores acquisition is expected to occur in fiscal 2006; however, no purchase price has been negotiated to date related to this pending acquisition. Net cash flow related to financing activities decreased for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006 as a result of the excess cash flow payment required under our Credit Facility and the second amendment to the Credit Facility. The excess cash flow payment is an annual requirement and our fiscal 2005 payment of $58.8 million was made in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Facility on March 31, 2006. In addition, in order to complete the second amendment to the Credit Facility, we paid off the outstanding Revolver loans of $6.9 million and pay lenders fees of $5.5 million on March 15, 2006. At April 2, 2006, we had a working capital deficit of $842.9 million, due to the accounting treatment of rental inventory and the reclassification of our Credit Facility to current liabilities. Rental inventory is treated as a non- current asset under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States because it is a depreciable asset and a portion of this asset is not reasonably expected to be completely realized in cash or sold in the normal business cycle. Although the rental of this inventory generates the major portion of our revenue, the classification of this asset as non-current results in its exclusion from working capital. The aggregate amount payable for this inventory, however, is reported as a current liability until paid and, accordingly, is reflected as a reduction in working capital. Consequently, we believe that working capital is not an appropriate measure of our liquidity, and we anticipate that we will continue to operate with a working capital deficit. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our critical accounting policies are described in our Annual Report on Form 10- K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006. Except as noted below, no changes have occurred to our critical accounting policies during the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006. Rental Inventory We regularly review, evaluate and update our rental amortization accounting estimates. Effective January 2, 2006, we reduced the amount capitalized on DVD revenue sharing units for the Movie Gallery segment, such that the carrying value of the units, when combined with revenue sharing expense on previously viewed sales, more closely approximates the carrying value of non-revenue sharing units. We also began to amortize games on an accelerated method for the Movie Gallery segment, effective January 2, 2006, to remain current with observed changes in rental patterns for games. These changes were accounted for as a change in accounting estimate, which increased cost of rental revenue by approximately $6.8 million and reduced net income by $6.8 million (net of tax), or $0.21 per diluted share, for the thirteen weeks ended April 2, 2006. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position, operating results, or cash flows due to adverse changes in financial and commodity market prices and rates. We have entered into certain market-risk- sensitive financial instruments for other than trading purposes, principally to hedge against fluctuation in variable interest rates on our short-term and long-term debt. The interest payable on the Credit Facility is based on variable interest rates equal to a specified Eurodollar rate or base rate and is therefore affected by changes in market interest rates. However, as required by the Credit Facility, we have entered into a two-year interest rate swap to exchange $280 million of the variable-rate Credit Facility debt for 4.06% fixed rate debt. If variable base rates were to increase 1%, our interest expense on an annual basis would increase by approximately $4.8 million on the non-hedged principal, based on both the outstanding balance on the Credit Facility as of April 2, 2006 and the Credit Facility's mandatory principal payment schedule. Item 4. Controls and Procedures The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities and Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon this evaluation as of April 2, 2006, management concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective for the reasons more fully described below related to the unremediated material weaknesses in the Company's internal control over financial reporting identified during the Company's evaluation pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as of the year ended January 1, 2006. To address these control weaknesses, the Company performed additional analysis and performed other procedures in order to prepare this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Accordingly, management believes that the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Management's assessment identified material weaknesses in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2006 that are in the process of being remediated as of April 2, 2006, as described further below. This section of Item 4, "Controls and Procedures," should be read in conjunction with Item 9A, "Controls and Procedures," included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2006, for additional information on Management's Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. As of April 2, 2006, the unremediated material weaknesses were: Ineffective management review of account analyses and reconciliations. Management's ineffective review of significant account analyses and reconciliations prepared as part of the financial reporting process, arising from a shortage of, and turnover in qualified personnel, did not function to reduce to remote the likelihood that material misstatement of certain accrued liability accounts in the financial statements would not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. This material weakness resulted in adjustments to several accrued liability accounts and related expenses and could affect substantially all of our significant accounts. Ineffective communication of accounting policy for capitalizing costs and lack of effective review process. Controls related to capitalization of property, furnishings and equipment, including invoice approval, coding and review processes, did not function to reduce to remote the likelihood that material misstatements of property, furnishings and equipment and store operating expenses would not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. This material weakness resulted in adjustments to property, furnishings and equipment, depreciation expense, accumulated depreciation, and store operating expenses. Inaccurate or lack of timely updating of accounting inputs for key estimates and assumptions. Controls that reasonably assure the accurate and timely updating of accounting data used in making estimates for financial reporting purposes did not function to reduce to remote the likelihood that errors in accounts affected by estimation processes could result in material misstatements that would not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. This deficiency is due, in part, to a lack of, and turnover in, qualified people with sufficient skills and experience, and in part to ineffective or incomplete policies and procedures surrounding periodic review and updating of key estimates and assumptions. This material weakness resulted in adjustments to rental inventory amortization, store supplies, merchandise inventory, and accrued liabilities. Remediation The Company has taken the following actions to address these material weaknesses: Ineffective procurement and receiving processes. As reported in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2006, several key controls did not function effectively to provide reasonable assurance that rental and merchandise inventory received at Company-operated distribution centers were appropriately accumulated, processed and recorded in the proper period. This combination of control deficiencies resulted in adjustments to accounts payable, rental inventory, merchandise inventory, costs of product sales, and rental inventory. As of April 2, 2006, the affected procurement and receiving processes have been integrated with other Company processes that have been operating effectively. As such, this integration effort has effectively remediated these control deficiencies. Capitalizing costs. Management has drafted a capital policy that includes guidance and thresholds in accounting for fixed asset additions and developed a monitoring control to regularly review the details of fixed asset additions in accordance with the draft policy. Management has taken the actions described above, which it believes address the material weakness related to properly capitalizing costs. Tests for effectiveness of these controls will be completed in future quarters. As a result, management will not be able to conclude on the success of the remediation until that time. Remediation efforts surrounding ineffective management review of account analyses and reconciliations, and inaccurate or lack of timely updating of accounting inputs for key estimates and assumptions will occur in future quarters in conjunction with integrating the Company's two accounting departments into a single department. Additionally, effectiveness in these areas will be dependent upon obtaining and maintaining qualified staff in these control areas, including finding a replacement for Bart Walker, Senior Vice President and Controller, who resigned from the company effective April 28, 2006. Other Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting On April 7, 2006, Timothy R. Price, the Company's Chief Financial Officer resigned and Mark D. Moreland was appointed interim Chief Financial Officer. Additionally, Bart Walker, Senior Vice President and Controller, resigned effective April 28, 2006. Further, pursuant to ongoing merger and process integration efforts arising out of the Hollywood acquisition, there continues to be a transition of certain financial reporting functions from the Company's headquarters in Dothan, Alabama to the Wilsonville, Oregon location. Other than these changes and the remediation of the material weaknesses described above, there have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Part II - Other Information Item 1. Legal Proceedings Hollywood and the members of its former board of directors (including Hollywood's former chairman Mark Wattles) were named as defendants in several lawsuits in the Circuit Court in Clackamas County, Oregon. The lawsuits, filed between March 31, 2004 and April 14, 2004, asserted breaches of duties associated with the merger agreement executed by Hollywood with a subsidiary of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. or LPG. The Clackamas County actions were later consolidated and the plaintiffs filed an Amended Consolidated Complaint alleging four claims for relief against Hollywood's former board members arising out of the merger of Hollywood with Movie Gallery. The purported four claims for relief are breach of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of confidential information, failure to disclose material information in the proxy statement in support of the Movie Gallery merger, and a claim for attorneys' fees and costs. The Amended Consolidated Complaint also names UBS Warburg and LGP as defendants. Following the merger with Movie Gallery, the plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Complaint. The plaintiffs restated their causes of action and generally allege that the defendants adversely impacted the value of Hollywood through the negotiations and dealings with LGP. Hollywood and the former members of its board have also been named as defendants in a separate lawsuit entitled JDL Partners, L.P. v. Mark J. Wattles et al. filed in Clackamas County, Oregon, Circuit Court on December 22, 2004. This lawsuit, filed before Hollywood's announcement of the merger agreement with Movie Gallery, alleges breaches of fiduciary duties related to a bid by Blockbuster Inc. to acquire Hollywood, as well as breaches related to a loan to Mr. Wattles that Hollywood forgave in December 2000. On April 25, 2005, the JDL Partners action was consolidated with the other Clackamas County lawsuits. The plaintiffs seek damages and attorneys' fees and costs. Hollywood denies these allegations and is vigorously defending this lawsuit. Hollywood was named as a defendant in a sexual harassment lawsuit filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Bronx County on April 17, 2003. The action, filed by eleven former female employees, alleges that an employee, in the course of his employment as a store director for Hollywood, sexually harassed and assaulted certain of the plaintiffs, and that Hollywood and its members of management failed to prevent or respond adequately to the employee's alleged wrongdoing. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, pre-judgment interest and attorneys' fees and costs. Hollywood denies these allegations and is vigorously defending this lawsuit. In addition, we have been named to various other claims, disputes, legal actions and other proceedings involving contracts, employment and various other matters. A negative outcome in certain of the ongoing litigation could harm our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. In addition, prolonged litigation, regardless of which party prevails, could be costly, divert management attention or result in increased costs of doing business. We believe we have provided adequate reserves for contingencies and that the outcome of these matters should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operation, financial condition or liquidity. At April 2, 2006, the legal contingencies reserve, net of expected recoveries from insurance carriers, was $3.0 million of which $2.3 million relates to pre- acquisition contingencies. The recorded reserves for some matters may require adjustment in future periods and those adjustments could be material. Under SFAS No. 141 "Business Combinations," some or all of any future revisions to the recorded reserves for pre-acquisition contingencies may be required to be treated as revisions to the preliminary purchase price allocation (described in Note 2) which generally would be recorded as adjustments to goodwill. Adjustments related to pre-acquisition contingencies made after the anniversary date of the acquisition will be recognized in the income statement in the period when such revisions are made. All other adjustments related to matters existing as of the date of acquisition of Hollywood will be recognized in the income statement in the period when such revisions are made. Item 1A. Risk Factors Our Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2006 includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below amends, updates and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2006. Uncertainty surrounding our ability to meet our financial obligations has adversely impacted and could continue to adversely impact our ability to obtain sufficient product on favorable terms. Since our acquisition of Hollywood in April 2005, we have entered into two amendments of our senior credit facility pursuant to which certain covenants in our senior credit facility were amended or waived. This, coupled with the continued declines and uncertainty in the rental industry, has caused negative publicity surrounding our business. As a result, our flexibility with our suppliers has been affected, and this risk may be exacerbated by the reclassification of borrowings under our senior credit facility as current liabilities on our balance sheet. We cannot assure you that our trade creditors will not further change their terms for payment on goods and services provided to us or that we will continue to be able to receive products and services on acceptable terms. To the extent our trade creditors change their terms in a manner that is adverse to us, this will increase the amount of cash that we need to operate our business, which may not be available on acceptable terms from lenders, or at all. Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds None. Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities None. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None. Item 5. Other Information None. Item 6. Exhibits a) Exhibits 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C Section 1350. 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a- 14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C Section 1350. Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Movie Gallery, Inc. ------------------- (Registrant) Date: May 12, 2006 /s/ Mark D. Moreland ------------------------------ Mark D. Moreland, Senior Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer EX-31 2 ex311.txt EXHIBIT 31.1 Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, J. T. Malugen, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form l0-Q of Movie Gallery, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 12, 2006 /s/ J. T. Malugen - ------------------------------------ J. T. Malugen Chief Executive Officer EX-31 3 ex312.txt EXHIBIT 31.2 Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Mark D. Moreland, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form l0-Q of Movie Gallery, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 12, 2006 /s/ Mark D. Moreland - ------------------------------------ Mark D. Moreland Interim Chief Financial Officer EX-32 4 ex321.txt EXHIBIT 32.1 Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION In connection with the quarterly report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company") on Form l0-Q for the period ended April 2, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. T. Malugen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the report. Date: May 12, 2006 /s/ J. T. Malugen - ------------------------------------ Name: J. T. Malugen Its: Chief Executive Officer EX-32 5 ex322.txt EXHIBIT 32.2 Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION In connection with the quarterly report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D. Moreland, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the report. Date: May 12, 2006 /s/ Mark D. Moreland - ----------------------------------- Name: Mark D. Moreland Its: Interim Chief Financial Officer -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----