XML 246 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.1
Acquisitions and Dispositions
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2022
Acquisitions and Dispositions ACQUISITIONS AND ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE
The disclosures in this note apply to AEP unless indicated otherwise.

ACQUISITIONS

Dry Lake Solar Project (Generation & Marketing Segment) (Applies to AEP)

In November 2020, AEP signed a Purchase and Sale Agreement with a nonaffiliate to acquire a 75% interest in the entity that owns the 100 MW Dry Lake Solar Project (collectively referred to as Dry Lake) located in southern Nevada for approximately $114 million. In March 2021, AEP closed the transaction and the solar project was placed in-service in May 2021. Approximately $103 million of the purchase price was paid upon closing of the transaction and the remaining $11 million was paid when the project was placed in-service. In accordance with the accounting guidance for “Business Combinations,” management determined that the acquisition of Dry Lake represents an asset acquisition. Additionally, and in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Consolidation,” management concluded that Dry Lake is a VIE and that AEP is the primary beneficiary based on its power as managing member to direct the activities that most significantly impact Dry Lake’s economic performance. As the primary beneficiary of Dry Lake, AEP consolidates Dry Lake into its financial statements. As a result, to account for the initial consolidation of Dry Lake, management applied the acquisition method by allocating the purchase price based on the relative fair value of the assets acquired and noncontrolling interest assumed.  The fair value of the primary assets acquired and the noncontrolling interest assumed was determined using the market approach.  The key input assumptions were the transaction price paid for AEP’s interest in Dry Lake and recent third-party market transactions for similar solar generation facilities. The nonaffiliated interest in Dry Lake is presented in Noncontrolling Interests on the balance sheets. Subsequent to close of the transaction, the noncontrolling interest made additional asset contributions of $16 million. As of March 31, 2022, AEP recognized approximately $145 million of Property, Plant and Equipment and approximately $35 million of Noncontrolling Interest on the balance sheets.

North Central Wind Energy Facilities (Vertically Integrated Utilities Segment) (Applies to AEP, PSO and SWEPCo)

In 2020, PSO and SWEPCo received regulatory approvals to acquire the NCWF, comprised of three Oklahoma wind facilities totaling 1,484 MWs, on a fixed cost turn-key basis at completion. PSO and SWEPCo own undivided interests of 45.5% and 54.5% of the NCWF, respectively. In total, the three wind facilities cost approximately $2 billion and consist of Traverse (998 MW), Maverick (287 MW) and Sundance (199 MW). Output from the NCWF serves retail load in PSO’s Oklahoma service territory and both retail and FERC wholesale load in SWEPCo’s service territories in Arkansas and Louisiana. The Oklahoma and Louisiana portions of the NCWF revenue requirement, net of PTC benefit, are recoverable through authorized riders beginning at commercial operation and until such time as amounts are reflected in base rates. Recovery of the Arkansas portion of the NCWF revenue requirement is requested in SWEPCo’s pending 2021 Arkansas Base Rate Case. The NCWF are subject to various regulatory performance requirements. If these performance requirements are not met, PSO and SWEPCo would recognize a regulatory liability to refund retail customers.

In April 2021, PSO and SWEPCo acquired respective undivided ownership interests in the entity that owned Sundance during its development and construction for $270 million, the first of the three NCWF acquisitions. Immediately following the acquisition, PSO and SWEPCo liquidated the entity and simultaneously distributed the Sundance assets in proportion to their undivided ownership interests. Sundance was placed in-service in April 2021.

In September 2021, PSO and SWEPCo acquired respective undivided ownership interests in the entity that owned Maverick during its development and construction for $383 million, the second of the three NCWF acquisitions. Immediately following the acquisition, PSO and SWEPCo liquidated the entity and simultaneously distributed the
Maverick assets in proportion to their undivided ownership interests. Maverick was placed in-service in September 2021.

In March 2022, PSO and SWEPCo acquired respective undivided ownership interests in the entity that owned Traverse during its development and construction for $1.2 billion, the third of the three NCWF acquisitions. Immediately following the acquisition, PSO and SWEPCo liquidated the entity and simultaneously distributed the Traverse assets in proportion to their undivided ownership interests. Traverse was placed in-service in March 2022.

In accordance with the guidance for “Business Combinations,” management determined that the acquisitions of the NCWF projects represent asset acquisitions.  As of March 31, 2022, PSO and SWEPCo had approximately $887 million and $1.1 billion, of gross Property, Plant and Equipment on the balance sheets, respectively, related to the NCWF projects. On an ongoing basis, management further determined that PSO and SWEPCo should apply the joint plant accounting model to account for their respective undivided interests in the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the NCWF projects.

The respective Purchase and Sale Agreements (PSAs) include interests in numerous land contracts, as originally executed between the nonaffiliated party and the respective owners of the properties as defined in the contracts. These contracts provide for easement and access rights to the land that Sundance, Maverick and Traverse were built upon. The lessee interests in the land contracts were transferred to Sundance, Maverick and Traverse (and subsequently to PSO and SWEPCo) as a part of the closings of the respective PSAs. The Current Obligations Under Operating Leases related to the NCWF projects were immaterial as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 for PSO and SWEPCo. See the table below for the Noncurrent Obligations Under Operating Leases for the NCWF projects for PSO and SWEPCo:

PSOSWEPCo
March 31, 2022December 31, 2021March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)
Project
Sundance$12.6 $12.6 $15.0 $15.1 
Maverick18.0 18.0 21.6 21.6 
Traverse40.0 — 48.0 — 
Total$70.6 $30.6 $84.6 $36.7 

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE

Disposition of KPCo and KTCo (Vertically Integrated Utilities and AEP Transmission Holdco Segments) (Applies to AEP and AEPTCo)

In October 2021, AEP entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to sell KPCo and KTCo to Liberty Utilities Co., a subsidiary of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (Liberty), for approximately a $2.85 billion enterprise value. The sale is subject to regulatory approvals from the FERC and KPSC. Clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and clearance from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States has been received.

Proposed Operations and Maintenance Agreement and Plant Ownership Agreement

KPCo currently operates and owns a 50% undivided interest in the 1,560 MW coal-fired Mitchell Plant with the remaining 50% owned by WPCo. The Stock Purchase Agreement is further contingent upon the issuance by the KPSC, WVPSC and FERC of orders regarding a new proposed Mitchell Plant Operations and Maintenance Agreement and Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement between KPCo and WPCo.
In November 2021, AEP made filings with the KPSC, WVPSC and FERC seeking approval of a proposed Mitchell Plant Operations and Maintenance Agreement and Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement, pursuant to which WPCo would replace KPCo as the operator of the Mitchell Plant and KPCo employees at the Mitchell Plant would become employees of WPCo. Under this originally proposed Ownership Agreement, WPCo is obligated to purchase KPCo’s 50% undivided interest in the Mitchell Plant on December 31, 2028 unless KPCo and WPCo have agreed to retire the Mitchell Plant earlier or, absent such agreement, if WPCo elects prior to December 31, 2027 to retire the Mitchell Plant on December 31, 2028. The Ownership Agreement provides that the purchase price for KPCo’s 50% ownership interest in the Mitchell Plant will be determined through the mutual agreement of WPCo and KPCo (subject to approval from the KPSC and WVPSC) or through a fair market valuation determination conducted by independent appraisals, with offsets for estimated decommissioning costs and the cost of ELG investments made by WPCo, if KPCo and WPCo are unable to reach agreement as to the purchase price.

In January 2022, intervenor testimony was filed with the KPSC, recommending the KPSC either reject the new proposed Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement or approve the agreement with certain modifications including a revision to the buyout provision that would set WPCo’s Mitchell Plant purchase price at the greater of fair market value or net book value. The intervenor testimony also recommends the KPSC reject the proposed Mitchell Plant Operations and Maintenance Agreement, which the testimony stated should be modified to remove references to the Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement. In February 2022, AEP filed rebuttal testimony with the KPSC opposing the intervenor testimony filed in January 2022. AEP’s rebuttal testimony also discusses an alternative proposal to the fair market value provision included in the proposed Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement. Under the alternative proposal, KPCo’s and WPCo’s interest in the Mitchell Plant would be divided by unit if the plant is not retired before the end of 2028 and a mutual agreement cannot be reached on a buyout price. Under the alternative proposal, mutual agreement on the buyout price or unit disposition would need to be finalized by May 2025, with a division of plant ownership by unit effective January 1, 2029, unless otherwise agreed. In March 2022, a hearing was held on the agreements with the KPSC. Following the hearing, KPCo amended its November 2021 filing with a new version of the Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement that provided further details about the alternative proposal. As amended, the proposed Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement creates procedures, subject to all required regulatory approvals, that provide the option for WPCo and KPCo to negotiate a sale of KPCo’s interest in the Mitchell Plant to WPCo, split the Mitchell Plant units with additional agreements for KPCo to utilize WPCo’s ELG assets, if necessary, or to agree on the procedures and timetable to retire one or both units. As amended, the proposed Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement replaced certain aspects of the originally proposed agreement including the buyout provision at fair market value. A hearing on the amended filing was held on March 30, 2022. A decision from the KPSC is expected in the second quarter of 2022.

For the filing at the WVPSC, intervenor testimony filed in March 2022 and briefs filed in April 2022 recommended various clarifying modifications to the Mitchell Ownership Agreement and the Mitchell Operations and Maintenance Agreement. A decision from the WVPSC is expected in the second quarter of 2022.

The KPSC and WVPSC intervened in the FERC proceeding and have recommended that FERC dismiss or reject AEP’s request, or defer ruling on AEP’s request until both the retail commissions have rendered decisions. In February 2022, AEP filed a motion to withdraw its filing with the FERC, noting that AEP intends to re-file its request after the KPSC and WVPSC have reviewed the agreements.

Transfer of Ownership

In December 2021, Liberty, KPCo and KTCo sought approval from the FERC under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act for the sale. In February 2022, several intervenors in the case filed protests related to whether the sale will negatively impact the wholesale transmission and generation rates of applicants. In April 2022, the FERC issued a deficiency letter stating that the Section 203 application is deficient and that additional information is required to process it. Liberty, KPCo and KTCo plan to respond to provide additional information in response to the letter. An order from the FERC is expected on the matter in the second quarter of 2022.

In January 2022, KPCo and Liberty filed a joint application requesting the KPSC authorize the transfer of ownership of KPCo to Liberty. In February 2022, certain intervenors filed testimony recommending that the KPSC not approve the transfer of ownership. If, however, the KPSC does approve the transfer, these intervenors recommend that the KPSC require AEP to compensate KPCo customers $578 million for alleged future increased
costs and higher rates that the intervenors claim will exist under Liberty’s ownership. AEP disagrees with the recommendation and filed rebuttal testimony in March 2022. AEP has committed to fund, through a reduction in Liberty’s purchase price, $20 million of Liberty’s commitment to provide $40 million of benefits to KPCo customers in bill reductions to help offset fuel costs. Intervenors also recommended imposing certain conditions on Liberty, including conditions related to recovering certain costs, inter-company agreement filing requirements, KPCo’s capital structure and future generation resource planning processes and analyses. In addition, certain intervenors argue that the commission should not approve the new proposed Mitchell Plant Ownership Agreement and Mitchell Plant Operations and Maintenance Agreement, and that deciding the request to transfer ownership of KPCo should be separated from approval of the Mitchell agreements even though such approval is a condition to the transaction closing. AEP also disagrees with this argument. A hearing was held with the KPSC in March 2022. In April 2022, certain intervenors filed briefs with the KPSC in support of their original recommendations, including both recommendations for and against approval of the transfer of KPCo to Liberty. A final order is expected in the second quarter of 2022.

Subject to receipt of regulatory approval and resolution of the Mitchell ownership and operating issues disclosed above, the sale is expected to close in the second quarter of 2022 with Liberty acquiring the assets and assuming the liabilities of KPCo and KTCo, excluding pension and other post-retirement benefit plan assets and liabilities. AEP expects to provide customary transition services to Liberty for a period of time after closing of the transaction.

AEP expects to receive approximately $1.4 billion in cash, net of taxes and transaction fees. AEP plans to use the proceeds to eliminate forecasted equity needs in 2022 as the company invests in regulated renewables, transmission and other projects. AEP and AEPTCo expect the sale to have a one-time impact on after-tax earnings that is not material.

The Income Before Income Tax Expense (Benefit) and Equity Earnings of KPCo and KTCo were not material to AEP and AEPTCo for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The major classes of KPCo and KTCo’s assets and liabilities presented in Assets Held for Sale and Liabilities Held for Sale on the balance sheets of AEP and AEPTCo are shown in the table below:
AEPAEPTCo
March 31, 2022December 31, 2021March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)
ASSETS
Accounts Receivable and Accrued Unbilled Revenues$75.3 $33.2 $1.8 $1.5 
Fuel, Materials and Supplies37.4 30.6 — — 
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net2,323.1 2,302.7 165.8 165.3 
Regulatory Assets492.7 484.7 — — 
Other Classes of Assets that are not Major44.1 68.5 2.3 1.1 
Assets Held for Sale$2,972.6 $2,919.7 $169.9 $167.9 
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable$57.5 $53.4 $1.1 $1.1 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year200.0 200.0 — — 
Customer Deposits34.2 32.4 — — 
Deferred Income Taxes440.9 441.6 15.8 15.4 
Long-term Debt903.2 903.1 — — 
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits140.2 148.1 7.8 7.6 
Other Classes of Liabilities that are not Major97.7 102.3 2.9 3.5 
Liabilities Held for Sale$1,873.7 $1,880.9 $27.6 $27.6