XML 46 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND REAL ESTATE ASSETS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND REAL ESTATE ASSETS  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND REAL ESTATE ASSETS

6FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND REAL ESTATE ASSETS

 

Financial Instruments Carried at Fair Value

 

The fair value of interest rate swaps, which are more fully described in Note 7, are determined using the market standard of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts).  The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rate forward curves derived from observable market interest rate curves (level 2 inputs, as defined by the authoritative guidance).  The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.  The Company has determined that the significant inputs used in this model are observable in active markets, therefore considers the interest rate swap asset valuation of $294 at December 31, 2014 and the interest rate swap liability valuation of $8,248 and $2,339 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, as level 2 classifications within the fair value hierarchy.

 

Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value

 

The Company follows the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements when valuing its financial instruments for disclosure purposes.  The valuation of financial instruments requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments.

 

Cash and cash equivalents, cash in escrows, accounts receivable, other assets, accounts payable, accrued interest payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, except for interest rate swaps, are all carried at their face amounts, which approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature and high probability of realization.

 

The Company determined the fair value of its mortgage notes payable, unsecured term loans, unsecured senior notes and unsecured line of credit facility using a discounted future cash flow technique that incorporates observable market-based inputs, including a market interest yield curve with adjustments for duration, loan to value (level 2 inputs), and risk profile (level 3 inputs).  In determining the market interest yield curve, the Company considered its investment grade credit ratings (level 2 inputs).  The Company has determined that the significant inputs used in this model are observable in active markets, therefore considers the valuation classified as level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.  At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the fair value of the Company’s total debt, consisting of the mortgage notes, the unsecured term loans, unsecured senior notes and unsecured line of credit, amounted to a liability of $2,542,588 and $2,552,416, respectively, compared to its carrying amount of $2,438,381 and $2,456,175, respectively.